Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Bitching about the Knicks draft is actually stupid and I shouldn’t have to explain but here we go. The entire Knicks roster aside from KAT/Mikal… is late firsts/second round picks, even Alvarado is undrafted. Mikal was acquired for late firsts, in reality, are overpriced boujie second round picks. Stop...

_the6thman's profile picture

Poppa Left

5,585 subscribers

17,757 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Maybe some coaches will chime in on this…. But this is how I’m seeing it right now. I think you’re going to see more and more two way guys coming on the scene in college baseball. Here is why. The rosters are going down to 34 man rosters. You will be needing 2-4 guys who can eat up an inning or two and be able to produce in the field and at the plate. Those numbers may be even higher than that. Years ago when a college told you- you can two way, it typically meant we are brining you in, youll have a short leash and your most likely going to be a PO. Now it’s a legit thing. Schools will need much more versatility- If you can pitch and hit AND play multiple spots on the field. Your stock will rise this year and years beyond. It’s just a matter of can you develop both and do both safely with the load on the arm. Bobcats open on the 13th at home!!! #slammarcos #baseball #twowayplayer #beisbol #pitcher
0:12

Maybe some coaches will chime in on this…. But this is how I’m seeing it right now. I think you’re going to see more and more two way guys coming on the scene in college baseball. Here is why. The rosters are going down to 34 man rosters. You will be needing 2-4 guys who can eat up an inning or two and be able to produce in the field and at the plate. Those numbers may be even higher than that. Years ago when a college told you- you can two way, it typically meant we are brining you in, youll have a short leash and your most likely going to be a PO. Now it’s a legit thing. Schools will need much more versatility- If you can pitch and hit AND play multiple spots on the field. Your stock will rise this year and years beyond. It’s just a matter of can you develop both and do both safely with the load on the arm. Bobcats open on the 13th at home!!! #slammarcos #baseball #twowayplayer #beisbol #pitcher

Tanner Carson

121,914 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“They’re going to try to come in and punk us. And if you will allow that, you will be punked. And I don’t think we have any guys that are going to be punked on this team. So, we might not be the most athletic and strongest, but we got to have the most heart” - Marcus Smart on HOU
0:11

“They’re going to try to come in and punk us. And if you will allow that, you will be punked. And I don’t think we have any guys that are going to be punked on this team. So, we might not be the most athletic and strongest, but we got to have the most heart” - Marcus Smart on HOU

Dave McMenamin

260,647 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Chris Cenac is coming in with a chip on his shoulder, trying to prove wrong the 26 teams that passed on him. "I dropped way lower than I was supposed to in the draft, so I'm coming out, showing everybody what I'm capable of doing and ... regretting the decision that they made."
0:16

Chris Cenac is coming in with a chip on his shoulder, trying to prove wrong the 26 teams that passed on him. "I dropped way lower than I was supposed to in the draft, so I'm coming out, showing everybody what I'm capable of doing and ... regretting the decision that they made."

Taylor Snow

49,575 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Snapshot of something Mike Vrabel expressed frustration with this morning: He sees Hunter Henry (bottom of screen) trying to communicate with the official 15 yards away/do the right thing alignment-wise … and still get penalized. “I’ll have to try to get some clarification on that — how we are going to do this going forward,” Vrabel says. Earlier today, in his radio interview, Vrabel shared that he was irked with over-officiating at the line of scrimmage. “If our guys are going to look over; I get that we have to be legal. But for as long as I can remember in this league, the refs are going to try to officiate proactively and work with the players. “If it’s a hold, call a hold. If it’s defensive pass interference, call defensive pass interference. But at the line of scrimmage, if players are going to try to get the formation correct … we’re not going to tell them that they are either on the line of scrimmage or they have them off? They’re just going to sit there and tap their knee? “I don’t know what that is. That’s frustrating that we are that literal as an officiating department — if that is indeed what they are telling them. … “I didn’t know when we were going to start officiating the line of scrimmage and not communicate with our players. Because in the end, the relationship the players have with officials, I think can be really positive and they can explain the mechanics they’re looking for.”
0:10

Snapshot of something Mike Vrabel expressed frustration with this morning: He sees Hunter Henry (bottom of screen) trying to communicate with the official 15 yards away/do the right thing alignment-wise … and still get penalized. “I’ll have to try to get some clarification on that — how we are going to do this going forward,” Vrabel says. Earlier today, in his radio interview, Vrabel shared that he was irked with over-officiating at the line of scrimmage. “If our guys are going to look over; I get that we have to be legal. But for as long as I can remember in this league, the refs are going to try to officiate proactively and work with the players. “If it’s a hold, call a hold. If it’s defensive pass interference, call defensive pass interference. But at the line of scrimmage, if players are going to try to get the formation correct … we’re not going to tell them that they are either on the line of scrimmage or they have them off? They’re just going to sit there and tap their knee? “I don’t know what that is. That’s frustrating that we are that literal as an officiating department — if that is indeed what they are telling them. … “I didn’t know when we were going to start officiating the line of scrimmage and not communicate with our players. Because in the end, the relationship the players have with officials, I think can be really positive and they can explain the mechanics they’re looking for.”

Mike Reiss

474,637 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

These are the individuals tasked with “teaching and educating” our children? It’s absolutely wild that we don’t even need to see the rest of her classroom to know exactly what she’s more than likely put up and got going on in there.
0:13

These are the individuals tasked with “teaching and educating” our children? It’s absolutely wild that we don’t even need to see the rest of her classroom to know exactly what she’s more than likely put up and got going on in there.

Liberacrat™️

41,452 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

If I knew winning ONE ring with the Knicks turns $1 into $1 BILLION… I would’ve personally driven LeBron to MSG 😂💰 One championship in New York is worth more than a lifetime supply of rings anywhere else. Yea, go head and save Gotham, LeRockefeller 😭
0:19

If I knew winning ONE ring with the Knicks turns $1 into $1 BILLION… I would’ve personally driven LeBron to MSG 😂💰 One championship in New York is worth more than a lifetime supply of rings anywhere else. Yea, go head and save Gotham, LeRockefeller 😭

Gilbert Arenas

119,855 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Women are revising their social media boyfriend requirements for 2026. OUT: 🆇 “Must be over 6 feet.” 🆇 “Must make over 6 figures.” 🆇 “Must own his own home.” IN: ✅ “Must like me.” ✅ “Must not be angry all the time.” ✅ “Must not cheat 24/7.” This is (in part) due to the male retreat from the dating space. There are more long-term single men than at any time in at least a century. Single men are more disinterested in dating and women than any time in at least a century. Women, as a result, are getting approached less, going on fewer dates, and running into far fewer men who actually want relationships (and a lot more guys ‘just playing the field’). You’d probably have to go back to the 1850s, with 300,000 men pushing west to seek their riches in California, living in frontier towns with 10-to-1 male-to-female ratios, to find a time with as many single men unfocused on women. (The shift in women’s ‘going rate’ is also due to the real economy declining… just like how in the roaring 1920s, when the economy was great and everything kept going up, women were flappers who delayed marriage and called wedding rings ‘handcuffs’ and ‘manacles’, but after the stock market crashed in 1929, and the Great Depression got underway, the flappers disappeared and the women of the 1930s suddenly became much more interested in getting hitched.) Anyway: If you are one of the dudes who has foresworn women and dating: thanks for your service, brother 🫡 If you are one of the dudes who is out there getting after it, though: you can look forward to a continuation in 2026 of women softening their stances, making themselves MORE available, asking you to jump through fewer hoops than ever, and acting clingier and needier if they think they have a chance with you. Just make sure you are out IN FIELD chatting up women, flirting with women, getting them onto dates, and inviting them home. You just need to be IN the game. A lot of guys aren’t in the game anymore (or they are locked up on screens, trying to do stuff online, trying to get girls by liking their pics, ‘sliding into their DMs’, where the odds are seriously stacked against ordinary men… ESPECIALLY compared to IRL). 2026 is bringing an increasingly WIDE open field with girls. FOR the guys who’ll be out there playing in it, that is!
0:16

Women are revising their social media boyfriend requirements for 2026. OUT: 🆇 “Must be over 6 feet.” 🆇 “Must make over 6 figures.” 🆇 “Must own his own home.” IN: ✅ “Must like me.” ✅ “Must not be angry all the time.” ✅ “Must not cheat 24/7.” This is (in part) due to the male retreat from the dating space. There are more long-term single men than at any time in at least a century. Single men are more disinterested in dating and women than any time in at least a century. Women, as a result, are getting approached less, going on fewer dates, and running into far fewer men who actually want relationships (and a lot more guys ‘just playing the field’). You’d probably have to go back to the 1850s, with 300,000 men pushing west to seek their riches in California, living in frontier towns with 10-to-1 male-to-female ratios, to find a time with as many single men unfocused on women. (The shift in women’s ‘going rate’ is also due to the real economy declining… just like how in the roaring 1920s, when the economy was great and everything kept going up, women were flappers who delayed marriage and called wedding rings ‘handcuffs’ and ‘manacles’, but after the stock market crashed in 1929, and the Great Depression got underway, the flappers disappeared and the women of the 1930s suddenly became much more interested in getting hitched.) Anyway: If you are one of the dudes who has foresworn women and dating: thanks for your service, brother 🫡 If you are one of the dudes who is out there getting after it, though: you can look forward to a continuation in 2026 of women softening their stances, making themselves MORE available, asking you to jump through fewer hoops than ever, and acting clingier and needier if they think they have a chance with you. Just make sure you are out IN FIELD chatting up women, flirting with women, getting them onto dates, and inviting them home. You just need to be IN the game. A lot of guys aren’t in the game anymore (or they are locked up on screens, trying to do stuff online, trying to get girls by liking their pics, ‘sliding into their DMs’, where the odds are seriously stacked against ordinary men… ESPECIALLY compared to IRL). 2026 is bringing an increasingly WIDE open field with girls. FOR the guys who’ll be out there playing in it, that is!

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

189,518 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

A court was only ever needed to decide what a woman is because men decided they can be women. The law, and society, has always known what a woman is - for better or worse. No one will understand the actual turmoil of going through a court case to establish what a woman is unless you have had to do it. It’s even more stressful than the stupid premise suggests. Sleepless nights, hair falling out, sporadic inconsolable crying fits. But yet, we persist. Because we have to. For Women Scotland have my full admiration, and more. They are right, they have done the right thing and history will remember them on the right side. It’s inevitable. Men will never be women. Never tell women we’re not a reality. We know the reality all too well and will fight to defend it. Women have had to fight for everything we have. We got nothing in law and society by accident. This is just the latest fight, albeit possibly the most stupid. I cannot wait to one day take my daughter to Scotland and show her the inevitable For Women Scotland statue and tell her “they did this for you”. Thank you. And in the words of the late, great, Magdalen Berns, “fuck off you wanker”.
0:19

A court was only ever needed to decide what a woman is because men decided they can be women. The law, and society, has always known what a woman is - for better or worse. No one will understand the actual turmoil of going through a court case to establish what a woman is unless you have had to do it. It’s even more stressful than the stupid premise suggests. Sleepless nights, hair falling out, sporadic inconsolable crying fits. But yet, we persist. Because we have to. For Women Scotland have my full admiration, and more. They are right, they have done the right thing and history will remember them on the right side. It’s inevitable. Men will never be women. Never tell women we’re not a reality. We know the reality all too well and will fight to defend it. Women have had to fight for everything we have. We got nothing in law and society by accident. This is just the latest fight, albeit possibly the most stupid. I cannot wait to one day take my daughter to Scotland and show her the inevitable For Women Scotland statue and tell her “they did this for you”. Thank you. And in the words of the late, great, Magdalen Berns, “fuck off you wanker”.

Sall Grover

126,308 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

LeBron's camp called New York. The Knicks passed. Good. That roster just put up a +283 point differential in the playoffs. Best in NBA history. Better than the 2017 Warriors. Better than every super team LeBron ever put together So they brought back basically the whole thing. Championships don't come from stacking names on top of names. This one came from five guys who already knew where each other was going to be before they got there.
0:16

LeBron's camp called New York. The Knicks passed. Good. That roster just put up a +283 point differential in the playoffs. Best in NBA history. Better than the 2017 Warriors. Better than every super team LeBron ever put together So they brought back basically the whole thing. Championships don't come from stacking names on top of names. This one came from five guys who already knew where each other was going to be before they got there.

Jersey Shore Knicks Guy

12,924 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

quick thought on the Knicks/Bridges blockbuster... Many of us have a gorgeous pair of Jordans in our closet that we never wear. We say we are waiting for a special occasion, the perfect time to break them out and wow our friends or impress some girl. But we don’t. Instead, they sit on that shelf and collect dust. Is there ever a “perfect” time? There probably wasn’t going to be a “perfect” time for Leon Rose to cash in his draft chips. Among the realistic potential options, Mikal Bridges is arguably as close to a perfect fit (considering his skill set, age, durability, mentality and chemistry/connections) imaginable for this Knicks roster as currently constituted (during Brunson's prime). Life is short. Wear your Jordans. Kudos to Leon for not being afraid to crease his J’s.
0:11

quick thought on the Knicks/Bridges blockbuster... Many of us have a gorgeous pair of Jordans in our closet that we never wear. We say we are waiting for a special occasion, the perfect time to break them out and wow our friends or impress some girl. But we don’t. Instead, they sit on that shelf and collect dust. Is there ever a “perfect” time? There probably wasn’t going to be a “perfect” time for Leon Rose to cash in his draft chips. Among the realistic potential options, Mikal Bridges is arguably as close to a perfect fit (considering his skill set, age, durability, mentality and chemistry/connections) imaginable for this Knicks roster as currently constituted (during Brunson's prime). Life is short. Wear your Jordans. Kudos to Leon for not being afraid to crease his J’s.

Tommy Beer

447,853 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Officially moving on from Tech game after I get this thought off my chest. I more than welcome anyone smarter than me in regards to the football to chime in. I truly, truly, truly cannot wrap my head around the thought process here. These two plays I'm sure anyone with brain can agree officially sealed KU's slim chances in having a chance to win this game. The play calling to me seems like completely flipped in logic at best? First one, you are down 4, on your own 30 so you are not going to go for this. Ignoring that we were getting dominated in the trenches in this game and that the 'obvious' play is a run, I don't get why we make the decision in a must get spot to take the ball out of our QB's (who at the time was rolling) hands. Jalon Daniels is our best player. In an absolute must get/need, we should be relying on him to make a play. Then the second one. I obviously don't know the answer here, but I feel somewhat confident that the reason we didn't run here was because of how the earlier 3rd & 1 run went. While I don't necessarily agree with the premise of decision making on this alone, I can appreciate the recognition that we are going to struggle to gain a yard in an obvious run situation. But the thing is, we are in go for it range so the one thing you absolutely cannot have is a massive negative play. Literally anything else is okay (obviously not a turnover). I truly don't think there's a good chance we run the ball on this attempt and get a yard. But THIS situation gives you a free shot at it if you want to take it. I think this play call would have worked if we didn't let their best player run at our qb freely but I'd just argue this play had a ton of potential risk that wasn't necessary. Hell even a play action pass out of out shot gun or something rolling JD out to the left would have given us a good shot at first down with an escape route to bail out on the play if something went wrong. I'm once again for the millionth time saying I know and understand that this entire staff knows more about football in their pinky than I do. But I do think the game has evolved and game + clock management doesn't really require football knowledge/have a direct correlation to one's football knowledge. It's not as simple as ESPN's graphic says GO so you should go etc, there are variables and human behavior etc to deal with and I understand that. But we are just getting these situations downright wrong. We are flipping a coin that has a 20 pound weight attached to the heads side and calling tails almost every single time. S/O anyone who read all this but would just love some insight if there's anyone who disagrees and is a lot smarter than I!
0:10

Officially moving on from Tech game after I get this thought off my chest. I more than welcome anyone smarter than me in regards to the football to chime in. I truly, truly, truly cannot wrap my head around the thought process here. These two plays I'm sure anyone with brain can agree officially sealed KU's slim chances in having a chance to win this game. The play calling to me seems like completely flipped in logic at best? First one, you are down 4, on your own 30 so you are not going to go for this. Ignoring that we were getting dominated in the trenches in this game and that the 'obvious' play is a run, I don't get why we make the decision in a must get spot to take the ball out of our QB's (who at the time was rolling) hands. Jalon Daniels is our best player. In an absolute must get/need, we should be relying on him to make a play. Then the second one. I obviously don't know the answer here, but I feel somewhat confident that the reason we didn't run here was because of how the earlier 3rd & 1 run went. While I don't necessarily agree with the premise of decision making on this alone, I can appreciate the recognition that we are going to struggle to gain a yard in an obvious run situation. But the thing is, we are in go for it range so the one thing you absolutely cannot have is a massive negative play. Literally anything else is okay (obviously not a turnover). I truly don't think there's a good chance we run the ball on this attempt and get a yard. But THIS situation gives you a free shot at it if you want to take it. I think this play call would have worked if we didn't let their best player run at our qb freely but I'd just argue this play had a ton of potential risk that wasn't necessary. Hell even a play action pass out of out shot gun or something rolling JD out to the left would have given us a good shot at first down with an escape route to bail out on the play if something went wrong. I'm once again for the millionth time saying I know and understand that this entire staff knows more about football in their pinky than I do. But I do think the game has evolved and game + clock management doesn't really require football knowledge/have a direct correlation to one's football knowledge. It's not as simple as ESPN's graphic says GO so you should go etc, there are variables and human behavior etc to deal with and I understand that. But we are just getting these situations downright wrong. We are flipping a coin that has a 20 pound weight attached to the heads side and calling tails almost every single time. S/O anyone who read all this but would just love some insight if there's anyone who disagrees and is a lot smarter than I!

Bryson Stricker

33,876 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The Sabotaging Practice of Over Supply and Sameness in the NFT Space. The current zeitgeist of the NFT space is that the same artists are doing the same kind of work five times a year, with project after project leaving a trail of disappointment and discontent among collectors and all of us watching in disbelief as huge resources are extracted from the space over work that feels like it could be left as an "artist study." I understand that you can do what you want with your money as collectors, but we are killing the whole space with this incestuous practice. No artist is that prolific to be able to do 5 collections of 100+ pieces each every year and actually deliver innovation and some kind of creative evolution. Of course, they can pretend play that the work has something new, but there is no precedent nor proof that that has ever happened in the speed that it happens in the NFT space. Again, people are free to through away their resources on whatever they want but with this way of doing things, we more and more are going to start seeing the consequences. Oh! There are consequences? Yes. Maybe unintended, but there are. Let's see. Let's start with the loss of belief in the NFT space as somewhere where emerging artists can come and find support for their experiments. Why even bother to bring experiments, innovation, and new ways to think of art on the blockchain if the same people have all the collectors hypnotized with their magical flutes? Why even try to come to a space where taking risks and challenging the status quo (the mission of art!!!) is overlooked? This makes the NFT space a social club and not a space for art. I guess it is fine, but IMO it is a recipe for disaster. New collectors stay away because the art will slowly but surely become stale and un-challenging. Why even bother to come and see what is happening here if you can't, as a collector, see new weird and up-and-coming artists? The amount of noise emitted by the same artists doing the same art over and over, drowns out any new voices. Again. A recipe for disaster. The NFT space is becoming a space of disappointment and doubt. We think that collections going to zero one after the other, over and over, is not damaging? I feel we are kidding ourselves. Disappointment piles up, and again, the people who will hurt are the emerging artists, the new blood, the ones who are willing to risk the most and, in return, put fire in this cold space of sameness. I love this space—don't get me wrong—it has changed my life, and I believe it has a ton of potential, but things need to change for it to become a beacon of light in art. But we need to support new voices. We need to support new ideas. The challenge is huge. I hope to contribute all I can to this change. I hope more and more see how exciting it is to go out and try to discover what else is out there and move this space forward. But again, I understand the leaps of faith needed, but if there is a space that is based on that, it's the NFT space...so there is hope. We will see. 📺by Boldtron
0:12

The Sabotaging Practice of Over Supply and Sameness in the NFT Space. The current zeitgeist of the NFT space is that the same artists are doing the same kind of work five times a year, with project after project leaving a trail of disappointment and discontent among collectors and all of us watching in disbelief as huge resources are extracted from the space over work that feels like it could be left as an "artist study." I understand that you can do what you want with your money as collectors, but we are killing the whole space with this incestuous practice. No artist is that prolific to be able to do 5 collections of 100+ pieces each every year and actually deliver innovation and some kind of creative evolution. Of course, they can pretend play that the work has something new, but there is no precedent nor proof that that has ever happened in the speed that it happens in the NFT space. Again, people are free to through away their resources on whatever they want but with this way of doing things, we more and more are going to start seeing the consequences. Oh! There are consequences? Yes. Maybe unintended, but there are. Let's see. Let's start with the loss of belief in the NFT space as somewhere where emerging artists can come and find support for their experiments. Why even bother to bring experiments, innovation, and new ways to think of art on the blockchain if the same people have all the collectors hypnotized with their magical flutes? Why even try to come to a space where taking risks and challenging the status quo (the mission of art!!!) is overlooked? This makes the NFT space a social club and not a space for art. I guess it is fine, but IMO it is a recipe for disaster. New collectors stay away because the art will slowly but surely become stale and un-challenging. Why even bother to come and see what is happening here if you can't, as a collector, see new weird and up-and-coming artists? The amount of noise emitted by the same artists doing the same art over and over, drowns out any new voices. Again. A recipe for disaster. The NFT space is becoming a space of disappointment and doubt. We think that collections going to zero one after the other, over and over, is not damaging? I feel we are kidding ourselves. Disappointment piles up, and again, the people who will hurt are the emerging artists, the new blood, the ones who are willing to risk the most and, in return, put fire in this cold space of sameness. I love this space—don't get me wrong—it has changed my life, and I believe it has a ton of potential, but things need to change for it to become a beacon of light in art. But we need to support new voices. We need to support new ideas. The challenge is huge. I hope to contribute all I can to this change. I hope more and more see how exciting it is to go out and try to discover what else is out there and move this space forward. But again, I understand the leaps of faith needed, but if there is a space that is based on that, it's the NFT space...so there is hope. We will see. 📺by Boldtron

alejandro cartagena

98,261 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Maduka Okoye went live on IG to clear the air about the alleged rumors of him having a relationship with Cardi B. This is what he said:l 'Cardi B is just a friend to me. We got nothing going on behind the scenes. I can’t be in a relationship with a mother of 3 kids. But I love her personality and her music we got nothing going on
0:10

Sensitive content

Maduka Okoye went live on IG to clear the air about the alleged rumors of him having a relationship with Cardi B. This is what he said:l 'Cardi B is just a friend to me. We got nothing going on behind the scenes. I can’t be in a relationship with a mother of 3 kids. But I love her personality and her music we got nothing going on

dangerous baby

426,202 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Here we go — banging up another flag at work 🇦🇺 Nothing feels better than this, honestly. Every time I see the flag, I feel that energy — a reminder of how great our nation is. It makes me optimistic about the future for my children and the country they’re growing up in. Everywhere I go, I’m seeing more and more flags on homes. People message me asking, “Was it you? Was it the Sons putting flags up all around the city — even around the country?” The truth is, it’s not just us. There are people everywhere banging up flags — on gum trees, power poles, bridges. In the suburbs, families are proudly hanging the flag on their homes. And in workplaces too — I’m seeing more businesses flying the Aussie flag. If there’s no flag at your work, take one in. Ask the boss. Hang it up. Bring that energy into your workplace and your community wherever you can. And if you want to be part of a men’s group — a bunch of mates who are proud of the flag — that’s what we do. We go for a proper feed, we have a yarn, and we bang up Aussie flags 🇦🇺 If you love this nation and you’re looking for good blokes to stand alongside, you’re welcome. Get amongst it. Join our new bloke chat. God bless Australia 🇦🇺
0:13

Here we go — banging up another flag at work 🇦🇺 Nothing feels better than this, honestly. Every time I see the flag, I feel that energy — a reminder of how great our nation is. It makes me optimistic about the future for my children and the country they’re growing up in. Everywhere I go, I’m seeing more and more flags on homes. People message me asking, “Was it you? Was it the Sons putting flags up all around the city — even around the country?” The truth is, it’s not just us. There are people everywhere banging up flags — on gum trees, power poles, bridges. In the suburbs, families are proudly hanging the flag on their homes. And in workplaces too — I’m seeing more businesses flying the Aussie flag. If there’s no flag at your work, take one in. Ask the boss. Hang it up. Bring that energy into your workplace and your community wherever you can. And if you want to be part of a men’s group — a bunch of mates who are proud of the flag — that’s what we do. We go for a proper feed, we have a yarn, and we bang up Aussie flags 🇦🇺 If you love this nation and you’re looking for good blokes to stand alongside, you’re welcome. Get amongst it. Join our new bloke chat. God bless Australia 🇦🇺

The Dusty Bogan

10,747 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

as you all know i was one of the main artist behind the successful $MEW launch and finally got some more time to work on a project of mine seeing the market, decided to do a bull in a bears world, in my opinion bulls will rise and defeat the bears so it is only a matter of time before we start sending again!!! check the video i animated, i think i cooked on it and got more vids coming. CA: CZjbhYMexXWHWiST8kQLyiNnPEMc97asUhYrpnLZpump
0:10

as you all know i was one of the main artist behind the successful $MEW launch and finally got some more time to work on a project of mine seeing the market, decided to do a bull in a bears world, in my opinion bulls will rise and defeat the bears so it is only a matter of time before we start sending again!!! check the video i animated, i think i cooked on it and got more vids coming. CA: CZjbhYMexXWHWiST8kQLyiNnPEMc97asUhYrpnLZpump

Alex the Artist

16,619 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The entire reason I’m even on this app is because of you baby boy! All I’ve ever wanted was to put you in a position to be better than me. That was the only comparison we’ve ever had. I trust in COACH PRIME to put you in a position to be successful and help grow you into the great young man we know you can be. Came a long way from them apartments baby boy!! Keep striving boot
0:10

The entire reason I’m even on this app is because of you baby boy! All I’ve ever wanted was to put you in a position to be better than me. That was the only comparison we’ve ever had. I trust in COACH PRIME to put you in a position to be successful and help grow you into the great young man we know you can be. Came a long way from them apartments baby boy!! Keep striving boot

Down South

18,294 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“spx6900 is going to be the coin that goes parabolic. we’re at $.50 cents right now. i believe we are going to $100 this cycle and $1,000 next cycle. right now, we’re on a dip. this is your chance to get in. this is going to be the biggest movement since GME and right now is the time for you to join the movement.” -Murad
0:19

“spx6900 is going to be the coin that goes parabolic. we’re at $.50 cents right now. i believe we are going to $100 this cycle and $1,000 next cycle. right now, we’re on a dip. this is your chance to get in. this is going to be the biggest movement since GME and right now is the time for you to join the movement.” -Murad

Tribalsphere6900💹🧲

75,272 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 NOW — PRESIDENT TRUMP: "We were going to talk about so many different products, but you know what they want to talk about? Sir, this is about eggs, eggs because we have the egg farmers of the entire country here and they are unbelievable!" "Eggs came down, they came down 40%, 50%. And by the time we got there, we had so many eggs, we didn't know what to do with them!" "And today we have more than 40,000 eggs supplied by all of the great egg farmers that are with us. So it's eggs is a big thing."
0:10

🚨 NOW — PRESIDENT TRUMP: "We were going to talk about so many different products, but you know what they want to talk about? Sir, this is about eggs, eggs because we have the egg farmers of the entire country here and they are unbelievable!" "Eggs came down, they came down 40%, 50%. And by the time we got there, we had so many eggs, we didn't know what to do with them!" "And today we have more than 40,000 eggs supplied by all of the great egg farmers that are with us. So it's eggs is a big thing."

Eric Daugherty

24,732 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten