Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Bitcoin Core V30 RANT. Core V30 increases the attack surface for Bitcoin, and will expose it to more threats long term. The conversation has drifted to an endless argument about spam and filters. THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE. Enter at your own risk. Language not suitable for kids.

Jethroe111's profile picture

George Bodine

18,858 subscribers

181,082 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Short clip and followup yesterday from the studio. When I said Core V30 would increase the attack surface and threat sector to Bitcoin I was attacked. Now that V30 failed-and resulted in loss of Bitcoin for some-where are those mouthpieces for Core? Lopp. Calle. Shinobi. Back. Livera. Remember the "adults in the room" telling us you couldn't trust Knots? Or Luke, or Mechanic. Now, V30 has been pulled. Failed. 200 developers and yet it released with numerous bugs. One fatal to some legacy wallets. Luke Dashjr Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110 The Bitcoin Boomers
2:55

Short clip and followup yesterday from the studio. When I said Core V30 would increase the attack surface and threat sector to Bitcoin I was attacked. Now that V30 failed-and resulted in loss of Bitcoin for some-where are those mouthpieces for Core? Lopp. Calle. Shinobi. Back. Livera. Remember the "adults in the room" telling us you couldn't trust Knots? Or Luke, or Mechanic. Now, V30 has been pulled. Failed. 200 developers and yet it released with numerous bugs. One fatal to some legacy wallets. Luke Dashjr Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110 The Bitcoin Boomers

George Bodine

17,628 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Run knots. I've never said Core V30 would destroy Bitcoin. But it DOES increase the attack surface and threat vectors to node runners and thus the network. Core is compromised. They are incompetent and their fucking around with Bitcoin is why we are where we are today.
2:42

Run knots. I've never said Core V30 would destroy Bitcoin. But it DOES increase the attack surface and threat vectors to node runners and thus the network. Core is compromised. They are incompetent and their fucking around with Bitcoin is why we are where we are today.

George Bodine

18,300 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

OPRETURN increases the threat surface and attack vectors to Bitcoin. Full stop. Core has caused this controversy. They failed to build alignment and consensus within the community for such an drastic change. They need to fix this. And soon.
4:01

OPRETURN increases the threat surface and attack vectors to Bitcoin. Full stop. Core has caused this controversy. They failed to build alignment and consensus within the community for such an drastic change. They need to fix this. And soon.

George Bodine

35,946 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

"The core flaw with Bitcoin, the largest likelihood for why Bitcoin would fail in the long term, is because it's not private." - Edward Snowden the solution to Bitcoin's privacy problem is Zcash
2:04

"The core flaw with Bitcoin, the largest likelihood for why Bitcoin would fail in the long term, is because it's not private." - Edward Snowden the solution to Bitcoin's privacy problem is Zcash

Zcash 🛡️

161,693 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Bitcoin Core OP RETURN and spam explained by a Core Dev with Antoine Poinsot | SLP661 Seeing as people want to discuss Bitcoin spam, Antoine Poinsot and I discuss Bitcoin's OP_RETURN in depth - covering spam filtering, consensus rules, miner centralization, the future of spam concerns & more. (00:00) - Intro (01:42) - Understanding Consensus & Relay policies in Bitcoin (05:21) - Historical context of standardness Rules in Bitcoin Core (11:05) - Are Bitcoin Core proponents being paid to ‘break’ Bitcoin? (13:42) - Differentiating b/w OP_RETURN PR & the general spam filtering debate (22:46) - Is Bitcoin Money or a Data Storage protocol? How do most Core devs view it? (25:36) - Why not raise the OP_RETURN limit to ~150 bytes? (29:02) - How urgent is it to fix the issue? (31:56) - Why not let the node runners choose what they want to relay? (39:03) - Do filters work or do they not? (43:27) - Are concerns about UTXO bloat, miner centralisation, block propagation etc. being overplayed by Core devs? (50:30) - Will miners who mine spam be penalised if node runners run knots? (1:00:28) - Is Bitcoin Core serious about stopping UTXO bloat? (1:07:00) - Why did Core not try to stop bare multisig spam? (1:08:58) - Should Bitcoin devs be playing a whackamole game with spammers? (1:18:24) - Summary & Future of OP_RETURN and spam concerns Includes Paid Partnerships
1:26:13

Bitcoin Core OP RETURN and spam explained by a Core Dev with Antoine Poinsot | SLP661 Seeing as people want to discuss Bitcoin spam, Antoine Poinsot and I discuss Bitcoin's OP_RETURN in depth - covering spam filtering, consensus rules, miner centralization, the future of spam concerns & more. (00:00) - Intro (01:42) - Understanding Consensus & Relay policies in Bitcoin (05:21) - Historical context of standardness Rules in Bitcoin Core (11:05) - Are Bitcoin Core proponents being paid to ‘break’ Bitcoin? (13:42) - Differentiating b/w OP_RETURN PR & the general spam filtering debate (22:46) - Is Bitcoin Money or a Data Storage protocol? How do most Core devs view it? (25:36) - Why not raise the OP_RETURN limit to ~150 bytes? (29:02) - How urgent is it to fix the issue? (31:56) - Why not let the node runners choose what they want to relay? (39:03) - Do filters work or do they not? (43:27) - Are concerns about UTXO bloat, miner centralisation, block propagation etc. being overplayed by Core devs? (50:30) - Will miners who mine spam be penalised if node runners run knots? (1:00:28) - Is Bitcoin Core serious about stopping UTXO bloat? (1:07:00) - Why did Core not try to stop bare multisig spam? (1:08:58) - Should Bitcoin devs be playing a whackamole game with spammers? (1:18:24) - Summary & Future of OP_RETURN and spam concerns Includes Paid Partnerships

Stephan Livera

28,305 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

What is the long-term vision for Core? 🤔 Rich and Luke Belmar 👽 discuss the massive opportunity that Bitcoin presents! 🔥
0:59

What is the long-term vision for Core? 🤔 Rich and Luke Belmar 👽 discuss the massive opportunity that Bitcoin presents! 🔥

Core DAO 🔶

22,524 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Core is intentionally opening the door for Bitcoin to become more like Ethereum. This is the stated intent of Core developers. They want to “future proof” any use case that wants to be developed on Bitcoin. I’m sorry but I do not want Bitcoin to become Ethereum.
1:31

Core is intentionally opening the door for Bitcoin to become more like Ethereum. This is the stated intent of Core developers. They want to “future proof” any use case that wants to be developed on Bitcoin. I’m sorry but I do not want Bitcoin to become Ethereum.

Dennis Porter

45,379 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“There was never any talk of the risk.” Peter Schiff is just lying at this point. The risk of $STRC was always obvious: it is preferred equity issued by a Bitcoin Treasury Company. Saylor said it clearly: if Bitcoin goes down long term or forever, that is the risk. And what are we seeing now? Bitcoin under pressure. Liquidity rotated into AI and IPOs. Maximum fear. STRC down. That is not some hidden scandal. That is risk premium repricing. Strategy does not magically control STRC’s market price. They can adjust the dividend rate, but the market prices the risk of Bitcoin and Strategy’s ability to keep paying dividends. And when Bitcoin starts going up again, what do you think happens? The same risk premium reprices in the other direction. If you buy preferred equity in a Bitcoin company, you are making one core assumption: Bitcoin goes up over the long term. That was never hidden.
0:42

“There was never any talk of the risk.” Peter Schiff is just lying at this point. The risk of $STRC was always obvious: it is preferred equity issued by a Bitcoin Treasury Company. Saylor said it clearly: if Bitcoin goes down long term or forever, that is the risk. And what are we seeing now? Bitcoin under pressure. Liquidity rotated into AI and IPOs. Maximum fear. STRC down. That is not some hidden scandal. That is risk premium repricing. Strategy does not magically control STRC’s market price. They can adjust the dividend rate, but the market prices the risk of Bitcoin and Strategy’s ability to keep paying dividends. And when Bitcoin starts going up again, what do you think happens? The same risk premium reprices in the other direction. If you buy preferred equity in a Bitcoin company, you are making one core assumption: Bitcoin goes up over the long term. That was never hidden.

Alex 👽

21,220 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

MUST WATCH🚨 "Bitcoin is not physical gold. You can kill Bitcoin." Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110 on the spam war, Bitcoin Core gone rogue, and BIP-110. This might be the most important Bitcoin interview of the year. The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ #279: Bitcoin Is Under Attack is out on audio now.
0:58

MUST WATCH🚨 "Bitcoin is not physical gold. You can kill Bitcoin." Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110 on the spam war, Bitcoin Core gone rogue, and BIP-110. This might be the most important Bitcoin interview of the year. The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ #279: Bitcoin Is Under Attack is out on audio now.

Cedric Youngelman ⚡️

44,136 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

There is so much demand for Bitcoin yield and Bitcoin collateral. Core will be tied to the products capturing that demand. Whether building them ourselves or partnering with teams, the Bitcoin Power Grid will sit at the center. ⚡️
0:33

There is so much demand for Bitcoin yield and Bitcoin collateral. Core will be tied to the products capturing that demand. Whether building them ourselves or partnering with teams, the Bitcoin Power Grid will sit at the center. ⚡️

Core DAO 🔶

54,950 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Core is everywhere. 🔶👀 From Bitcoin alignment to EVM compatibility, Core is building the infrastructure for the next generation of Bitcoin finance. The adoption is getting stronger. The ecosystem is expanding. And $CORE is just getting started. 🚀 Don’t sleep on Core. 🔶🔥 #CoreDAO #CORE #Bitcoin #BTCFi #Crypto Core DAO 🔶
0:21

Core is everywhere. 🔶👀 From Bitcoin alignment to EVM compatibility, Core is building the infrastructure for the next generation of Bitcoin finance. The adoption is getting stronger. The ecosystem is expanding. And $CORE is just getting started. 🚀 Don’t sleep on Core. 🔶🔥 #CoreDAO #CORE #Bitcoin #BTCFi #Crypto Core DAO 🔶

Core Liquidity 🔶

10,570 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Bitcoin is not just something to hold. It is becoming one of the cleanest collateral assets in the world. Core is building the products for that future.
0:58

Bitcoin is not just something to hold. It is becoming one of the cleanest collateral assets in the world. Core is building the products for that future.

Core DAO 🔶

35,979 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🎙️Is Bitcoin Compromised? Ep. 156 with Luke de Wolf * This episode was recorded in May 2026, before the BIP110 activation Luke de Wolf, industrial cybersecurity expert and author of “Defending Bitcoin”, applies critical infrastructure security frameworks to Bitcoin itself. We dig into the network's real risks and vulnerabilities: arbitrary data, Bitcoin Core's governance structure, and the Core vs. Knots split. Luke’s argument: Bitcoin has weathered this so far, but complacency is the one risk it can't afford. → Please like, comment, share & subscribe, to help me beat the suppressing algo's. Thank you! 00:00 - Coming Up... 01:14 - Introduction: Luke de Wolf 06:23 - Critical Infrastructure & Payment Infrastructure 10:29 - Ad-Break: Expat Money & Ledn 12:51 - Cybersecurity as a Framework for Digital Risk 15:51 - The Structure of Luke's Book "Defending Bitcoin" 17:18 - How Do We Keep Bitcoin Secure? 18:48 - Threats to the Network: Nodes, Miners, Developers 19:51 - Mining Centralization Risk & Examples 25:05 - The Case For Remote and Solo Mining and Hashing 27:41 - The ASIC Supply Chain and Security Risks 31:18 - Devs: Bitcoin Core Governance Structure & Risks 33:06 - Arbitrary Data - Context & History 36:28 - Spam, Proof of Work and Bitcoin's Availability 39:18 - Taproot's Vulnerabilities Making Bitcoin Less Usable As Money 46:40 - Core v30, OP_RETURN and Migration to Knots 47:58 - Rough Consensus and the Five Maintainers 50:24 - Ad-Break: Trezor & Abundant Mines 52:16 - The Brink Pipeline and Nominating Your Own Successor 54:46 - Participation in the Protocol and Why Adoption Matters 01:00:18 - Why Luke Wrote This Book
1:05:00

🎙️Is Bitcoin Compromised? Ep. 156 with Luke de Wolf * This episode was recorded in May 2026, before the BIP110 activation Luke de Wolf, industrial cybersecurity expert and author of “Defending Bitcoin”, applies critical infrastructure security frameworks to Bitcoin itself. We dig into the network's real risks and vulnerabilities: arbitrary data, Bitcoin Core's governance structure, and the Core vs. Knots split. Luke’s argument: Bitcoin has weathered this so far, but complacency is the one risk it can't afford. → Please like, comment, share & subscribe, to help me beat the suppressing algo's. Thank you! 00:00 - Coming Up... 01:14 - Introduction: Luke de Wolf 06:23 - Critical Infrastructure & Payment Infrastructure 10:29 - Ad-Break: Expat Money & Ledn 12:51 - Cybersecurity as a Framework for Digital Risk 15:51 - The Structure of Luke's Book "Defending Bitcoin" 17:18 - How Do We Keep Bitcoin Secure? 18:48 - Threats to the Network: Nodes, Miners, Developers 19:51 - Mining Centralization Risk & Examples 25:05 - The Case For Remote and Solo Mining and Hashing 27:41 - The ASIC Supply Chain and Security Risks 31:18 - Devs: Bitcoin Core Governance Structure & Risks 33:06 - Arbitrary Data - Context & History 36:28 - Spam, Proof of Work and Bitcoin's Availability 39:18 - Taproot's Vulnerabilities Making Bitcoin Less Usable As Money 46:40 - Core v30, OP_RETURN and Migration to Knots 47:58 - Rough Consensus and the Five Maintainers 50:24 - Ad-Break: Trezor & Abundant Mines 52:16 - The Brink Pipeline and Nominating Your Own Successor 54:46 - Participation in the Protocol and Why Adoption Matters 01:00:18 - Why Luke Wrote This Book

Efrat Fenigson

20,589 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"Is there even such a thing as 'spam' on Bitcoin?" Samson Mow cuts through the argument most Bitcoiners talk past. Native Bitcoin data vs. ordinals, why immutability is the thing being abused, and where the line between spam and not-spam actually sits. The definition the BIP 110 fight keeps dodging. Samson Mow on what actually counts as spam: "There's a simpler way to define spam: it's not an organic Bitcoin transaction — it's trying to do something else. A Bitcoin transaction is data, yes — but it's Bitcoin's native data. If you're sending someone Bitcoin, that's not spam. But a lot of what we're seeing now — ordinals and the like — is trying to embed data and images into Bitcoin to piggyback on its immutability. That's the delineation: this is spam, this is not." Samson Mow on The The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ #243
0:58

"Is there even such a thing as 'spam' on Bitcoin?" Samson Mow cuts through the argument most Bitcoiners talk past. Native Bitcoin data vs. ordinals, why immutability is the thing being abused, and where the line between spam and not-spam actually sits. The definition the BIP 110 fight keeps dodging. Samson Mow on what actually counts as spam: "There's a simpler way to define spam: it's not an organic Bitcoin transaction — it's trying to do something else. A Bitcoin transaction is data, yes — but it's Bitcoin's native data. If you're sending someone Bitcoin, that's not spam. But a lot of what we're seeing now — ordinals and the like — is trying to embed data and images into Bitcoin to piggyback on its immutability. That's the delineation: this is spam, this is not." Samson Mow on The The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ #243

Cedric Youngelman ⚡️

10,533 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨THE "10/10 CRASH" WAS A DISTRACTION A 15% weekly drawdown is normal for Bitcoin. Liquidation cascades happen constantly and do not cause long-term weakness. The real issue is quantum risk and the shift in institutional behavior that followed.
3:07

🚨THE "10/10 CRASH" WAS A DISTRACTION A 15% weekly drawdown is normal for Bitcoin. Liquidation cascades happen constantly and do not cause long-term weakness. The real issue is quantum risk and the shift in institutional behavior that followed.

Coin Bureau

39,681 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Core, ‌the Bitcoin-first ‌chain, and how it’s trying to stretch BTC’s usefulness Core DAO (Core DAO 🔶) brands itself as “The Bitcoin Everything Chain.” The pitch is simple: take Bitcoin’s strengths and push them beyond the usual buy-and-hold story. The protocol centers on one main idea: BTC shouldn’t sit still. Core wants idle Bitcoin to earn, but without giving up the properties people care about most: safety, decentralization, and full self-custody. To get there, Core leans on a mix of Satoshi Plus, timelocks, and a quick Layer 1 EVM chain. Satoshi Plus folds in Delegated Proof of Work (so Bitcoin miners can participate), self-custodial Bitcoin staking, and staking of the $CORE token. Core frames the relationship with Bitcoin as mutualistic. It borrows security and incentive alignment from Bitcoin, then tries to send value back through extra miner rewards, trustless yield opportunities for BTC holders, and infrastructure that makes it easier for Bitcoin products to plug in and scale. Key ways Core aims to expand Bitcoin utility: 1.) Self-custodial Bitcoin staking Lock BTC with timelocks directly on the Bitcoin network (CLTV) and earn CORE yield, no wrapping, no bridges, and no handing custody to anyone else. 2.) Dual staking Stake $BTC and $CORE together to reach higher yield tiers. 3.) Tapping Bitcoin’s hash power Miners can delegate hash power to earn extra CORE rewards, while Core itself is secured using a majority share of Bitcoin’s hash rate. 4.) The “Bitcoin Power Grid” A set of rails Bitcoin products can connect to, built around yield, collateral, payments, and DeFi use cases. 5.) Scalable Bitcoin DeFi An EVM-compatible network designed for faster, cheaper BTCFi apps. 6.) Two-way value flow The goal is to strengthen Bitcoin’s security budget over time, while also turning dormant BTC into something that can actively do work. In plain terms, Core DAO’s broader mission is to make Bitcoin more productive without piling on trust assumptions, converting energy and capital tied up in Bitcoin into yield, DeFi activity, and scalable infrastructure.
0:30

Core, ‌the Bitcoin-first ‌chain, and how it’s trying to stretch BTC’s usefulness Core DAO (Core DAO 🔶) brands itself as “The Bitcoin Everything Chain.” The pitch is simple: take Bitcoin’s strengths and push them beyond the usual buy-and-hold story. The protocol centers on one main idea: BTC shouldn’t sit still. Core wants idle Bitcoin to earn, but without giving up the properties people care about most: safety, decentralization, and full self-custody. To get there, Core leans on a mix of Satoshi Plus, timelocks, and a quick Layer 1 EVM chain. Satoshi Plus folds in Delegated Proof of Work (so Bitcoin miners can participate), self-custodial Bitcoin staking, and staking of the $CORE token. Core frames the relationship with Bitcoin as mutualistic. It borrows security and incentive alignment from Bitcoin, then tries to send value back through extra miner rewards, trustless yield opportunities for BTC holders, and infrastructure that makes it easier for Bitcoin products to plug in and scale. Key ways Core aims to expand Bitcoin utility: 1.) Self-custodial Bitcoin staking Lock BTC with timelocks directly on the Bitcoin network (CLTV) and earn CORE yield, no wrapping, no bridges, and no handing custody to anyone else. 2.) Dual staking Stake $BTC and $CORE together to reach higher yield tiers. 3.) Tapping Bitcoin’s hash power Miners can delegate hash power to earn extra CORE rewards, while Core itself is secured using a majority share of Bitcoin’s hash rate. 4.) The “Bitcoin Power Grid” A set of rails Bitcoin products can connect to, built around yield, collateral, payments, and DeFi use cases. 5.) Scalable Bitcoin DeFi An EVM-compatible network designed for faster, cheaper BTCFi apps. 6.) Two-way value flow The goal is to strengthen Bitcoin’s security budget over time, while also turning dormant BTC into something that can actively do work. In plain terms, Core DAO’s broader mission is to make Bitcoin more productive without piling on trust assumptions, converting energy and capital tied up in Bitcoin into yield, DeFi activity, and scalable infrastructure.

BSCN

27,175 görüntüleme • 29 gün önce

Introducing version control in the Bitcoin Node app on umbrelOS. Automatically switch to the latest available version of Bitcoin Core each time you update the app for the latest security fixes and bleeding edge features. Or stick to a specific version for rock-solid reliability. Your Bitcoin Node app will continue to receive updates from the Umbrel App Store independently. And your Bitcoin Core version selection stays put until you change it.
0:26

Introducing version control in the Bitcoin Node app on umbrelOS. Automatically switch to the latest available version of Bitcoin Core each time you update the app for the latest security fixes and bleeding edge features. Or stick to a specific version for rock-solid reliability. Your Bitcoin Node app will continue to receive updates from the Umbrel App Store independently. And your Bitcoin Core version selection stays put until you change it.

Umbrel ☂️

50,330 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce