Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

BitGo CEO Mike Belshe on the regulatory double standard that lets institutions use private ledgers while keeping retail locked out "Of course your money should be private. If you're getting paid your paycheck on a blockchain, do you want that to be public? Nobody wants that. And yet the...

scottmelker's profile picture

The Wolf Of All Streets

1,084,746 subscribers

38,874 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

4 Yorum

The Wolf Of All Streets profil fotoğrafı
The Wolf Of All Streets12 gün önce

FT @mikebelshe

Benjamin Whitby GVNR.xyz 🔗 🇬🇧/acc 🦇🔊 profil fotoğrafı
Benjamin Whitby GVNR.xyz 🔗 🇬🇧/acc 🦇🔊12 gün önce

Absolutely spot on @mikebelshe ⭐️

Humain974 profil fotoğrafı
Humain97411 gün önce

Kaspa Give the choice

Avii profil fotoğrafı
Avii12 gün önce

Preach. Privacy isn't a crime, it's basic.

Benzer Videolar

"You're BlackRock and you send JP Morgan money from one bank account to another. Would you want everybody to be able to see that?" "A lot of these chains, seeing the success of Canton and others, realize that institutions are not going to participate in crypto unless privacy is a given. Privacy, or we could even call it confidentiality in this case, like developing confidential transfers" "The problem with public blockchains is that you may not know it's my bank account and your bank account, but everybody can see where some money was sent, and with any decent onchain analysis, probably tie that to you. Institutions can't do that. The largest institutions on the planet need to know their transactions are completely confidential" "Ethereum Foundation researchers are launching an institutional grade privacy system called ETH Systems. They're developing confidential transfers, private bond issuance, privacy preserving identity, and confidential settlement systems designed specifically for institutional users"
1:18

"You're BlackRock and you send JP Morgan money from one bank account to another. Would you want everybody to be able to see that?" "A lot of these chains, seeing the success of Canton and others, realize that institutions are not going to participate in crypto unless privacy is a given. Privacy, or we could even call it confidentiality in this case, like developing confidential transfers" "The problem with public blockchains is that you may not know it's my bank account and your bank account, but everybody can see where some money was sent, and with any decent onchain analysis, probably tie that to you. Institutions can't do that. The largest institutions on the planet need to know their transactions are completely confidential" "Ethereum Foundation researchers are launching an institutional grade privacy system called ETH Systems. They're developing confidential transfers, private bond issuance, privacy preserving identity, and confidential settlement systems designed specifically for institutional users"

The Wolf Of All Streets

71,718 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

‼️😳 The XRP Ledger Just Flipped A Switch To Onboard Large Banks and Institutions Institutions won’t move trillions onto a public chain without privacy protocols that guarantee privacy, compliance & security. XRPL just changed that with ZK-proofs. Private Transfers. Private Balance. Private Identity. Boundless and DNA Protocol (DNA Protocol) are building the ZK-credential and verification layer on XRPL, enabling institutional-grade privacy. Satoshi envisioned it. Bitcoin couldn’t execute it. XRPL just unlocked the missing piece for trillions in liquidity to be deployed on-chain securely. ZK-protocols might be the most undervalued technology in blockchain:
1:08

‼️😳 The XRP Ledger Just Flipped A Switch To Onboard Large Banks and Institutions Institutions won’t move trillions onto a public chain without privacy protocols that guarantee privacy, compliance & security. XRPL just changed that with ZK-proofs. Private Transfers. Private Balance. Private Identity. Boundless and DNA Protocol (DNA Protocol) are building the ZK-credential and verification layer on XRPL, enabling institutional-grade privacy. Satoshi envisioned it. Bitcoin couldn’t execute it. XRPL just unlocked the missing piece for trillions in liquidity to be deployed on-chain securely. ZK-protocols might be the most undervalued technology in blockchain:

Stellar Rippler🚀

17,515 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

NEW EPISODE - Wall Street Wants Ethereum. Privacy Is the Bottleneck Institutions want to move onchain, but public-by-default finance still exposes too much. EthSystems co-founders Mo and oskarth join David Hoffman to break down why privacy may be Ethereum’s biggest institutional unlock, what banks and asset managers are actually asking for, and how private institutional rails could eventually plug into DeFi. CHAPTERS --- ETH Systems The Founders Institutional Privacy Real-World Use Cases From Bespoke to Scalable Building the Product Institutions Are Coming The Future of Institutional DeFi Privacy vs Transparency What Ethereum Can Do? Cypherpunks and Institutions
53:12

NEW EPISODE - Wall Street Wants Ethereum. Privacy Is the Bottleneck Institutions want to move onchain, but public-by-default finance still exposes too much. EthSystems co-founders Mo and oskarth join David Hoffman to break down why privacy may be Ethereum’s biggest institutional unlock, what banks and asset managers are actually asking for, and how private institutional rails could eventually plug into DeFi. CHAPTERS --- ETH Systems The Founders Institutional Privacy Real-World Use Cases From Bespoke to Scalable Building the Product Institutions Are Coming The Future of Institutional DeFi Privacy vs Transparency What Ethereum Can Do? Cypherpunks and Institutions

Bankless

142,670 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

🚨🤯 Former Ripple Global Head Dilip Rao just CONFIRMED: XRP was NEVER meant for retail! He straight-up said the shallow retail trading on exchanges “is NOT the use case we are pursuing.” What they want is XRP as a financial asset for sophisticated institutions as a bridging mechanism. And the killer line: “As this transitions away from retail to institutions… that’s when the turning point will come.” I’ve been warning everyone, they’ve been systematically shaking out the weak retail hands through price manipulation and FUD to clear the decks for institutions to accumulate. Japan just showed they’re fully adopting the XRPL ecosystem protocols for yield(Doppler Finance) and privacy (DNA Protocol) and not just XRP. This is the moment they’ve been engineering. Every single XRP will be treated like DIGITAL GOLD. 🪙💰 Real adoption starts NOW.
1:01

🚨🤯 Former Ripple Global Head Dilip Rao just CONFIRMED: XRP was NEVER meant for retail! He straight-up said the shallow retail trading on exchanges “is NOT the use case we are pursuing.” What they want is XRP as a financial asset for sophisticated institutions as a bridging mechanism. And the killer line: “As this transitions away from retail to institutions… that’s when the turning point will come.” I’ve been warning everyone, they’ve been systematically shaking out the weak retail hands through price manipulation and FUD to clear the decks for institutions to accumulate. Japan just showed they’re fully adopting the XRPL ecosystem protocols for yield(Doppler Finance) and privacy (DNA Protocol) and not just XRP. This is the moment they’ve been engineering. Every single XRP will be treated like DIGITAL GOLD. 🪙💰 Real adoption starts NOW.

Stellar Rippler🚀

140,008 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A few weeks back, Multicoin Capital's cofounder Tushar Jain told us privacy wasn't optional for institutions moving onchain. This week's HYPE unstake proved it: "It's ridiculous to think institutions will move RWAs onchain and broadcast all their activity in real time." "So you need privacy protocols like Zama, that give you the upgrade blockchains allow, but let you do it privately."
1:07

A few weeks back, Multicoin Capital's cofounder Tushar Jain told us privacy wasn't optional for institutions moving onchain. This week's HYPE unstake proved it: "It's ridiculous to think institutions will move RWAs onchain and broadcast all their activity in real time." "So you need privacy protocols like Zama, that give you the upgrade blockchains allow, but let you do it privately."

The Rollup

13,612 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

INSIGHTS: Vitalik just said what the data already showed. For years banks said: we want blockchain. But not Bitcoin. Not Ethereum. We'll build our own. Their blockchains promised the best of both worlds. They delivered the worst. Centralized enough to be controlled. Decentralized enough to be slow. Private enough to exclude the public. Open enough to exclude real privacy. His solution: Don't rebuild. Retrofit. Add cryptographic proof to existing servers. Anchor to Ethereum. Done. The man who built Ethereum just told institutions: You don't need your own chain. You need ours.
0:26

INSIGHTS: Vitalik just said what the data already showed. For years banks said: we want blockchain. But not Bitcoin. Not Ethereum. We'll build our own. Their blockchains promised the best of both worlds. They delivered the worst. Centralized enough to be controlled. Decentralized enough to be slow. Private enough to exclude the public. Open enough to exclude real privacy. His solution: Don't rebuild. Retrofit. Add cryptographic proof to existing servers. Anchor to Ethereum. Done. The man who built Ethereum just told institutions: You don't need your own chain. You need ours.

Merlijn The Trader

459,944 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Boring is fantastic. Why? Because institutions want infrastructure that works. Reliable, dependable and composable. John Murray, Head of Content at P2P.org, explains why privacy is about hiding what you need to. 🎥 Watch the full clip👇
0:54

Boring is fantastic. Why? Because institutions want infrastructure that works. Reliable, dependable and composable. John Murray, Head of Content at P2P.org, explains why privacy is about hiding what you need to. 🎥 Watch the full clip👇

Canton Network

13,174 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

.tilo | helius.dev/privacy shares Helius' vision for privacy on Solana “The goal is to have a complete privacy ecosystem inside of Solana where you can directly, without ever hopping through a public balance, directly onramp to your private balance” “You'll be able to send, swap, earn yield and do whatever you want with your balance not shown” “This is the overarching goal, and for people to build whatever they would like to build on top, of course”
0:27

.tilo | helius.dev/privacy shares Helius' vision for privacy on Solana “The goal is to have a complete privacy ecosystem inside of Solana where you can directly, without ever hopping through a public balance, directly onramp to your private balance” “You'll be able to send, swap, earn yield and do whatever you want with your balance not shown” “This is the overarching goal, and for people to build whatever they would like to build on top, of course”

Solana

132,492 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"
2:05

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Brad

35,334 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"If we do our job right, nobody cares about privacy anymore. It won't be a topic, not because we gave up, but because it'll just be by design in every blockchain transaction" Rand, founder of Zama, on why the goal is to make privacy something you never think about "Privacy has become one of the hot topics again. In the earlier crypto days it was probably one of the main topics, then we went through all these crazy bubbles and people seem to have forgotten about it, I guess because they were making so much money at the time. But it seems we've come home" "I've been in crypto since 2013, this is my fourth or fifth cycle. What changed, and this was our bet at Zama, is that we saw institutions, banks, people wanting to use blockchain for finance, and privacy was a missing element. People are excited about privacy today not because of the original cypherpunk ideals we had initially, but because finance requires it, and because people are excited about trillions moving onchain" "It's like your browser. There's this small lock when you connect to a website, the connection is encrypted, and you don't think about it. We have to do the same for blockchain transactions, it'll just be there by design"
1:42

"If we do our job right, nobody cares about privacy anymore. It won't be a topic, not because we gave up, but because it'll just be by design in every blockchain transaction" Rand, founder of Zama, on why the goal is to make privacy something you never think about "Privacy has become one of the hot topics again. In the earlier crypto days it was probably one of the main topics, then we went through all these crazy bubbles and people seem to have forgotten about it, I guess because they were making so much money at the time. But it seems we've come home" "I've been in crypto since 2013, this is my fourth or fifth cycle. What changed, and this was our bet at Zama, is that we saw institutions, banks, people wanting to use blockchain for finance, and privacy was a missing element. People are excited about privacy today not because of the original cypherpunk ideals we had initially, but because finance requires it, and because people are excited about trillions moving onchain" "It's like your browser. There's this small lock when you connect to a website, the connection is encrypted, and you don't think about it. We have to do the same for blockchain transactions, it'll just be there by design"

The Wolf Of All Streets

66,454 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

90% of trading advice is designed to TURN you into liquidity for the rich. Think about it. Institutions taught you to: • Buy breakouts—right when institutions sell at the top. • Use tight stop losses—so you get shaken out before the real move happens. • Trade every setup you see—constantly in the market, paying spreads and commissions. Why? Because they have to make money off of someone. In other words: You become their exit liquidity. That's why conventional advice keeps retail traders active, confused and praying their next trade is profitable, while institutions become wealthy. — This is just a short clip from my recent 20-minute YouTube video. I also cover discussing the journaling method that actually improves your trading, how to spot fake gurus instantly and the simple technique that grew my account when I was a beginner. Just comment “TRADING” if you want to watch it and I’ll DM it to you immediately.
0:51

90% of trading advice is designed to TURN you into liquidity for the rich. Think about it. Institutions taught you to: • Buy breakouts—right when institutions sell at the top. • Use tight stop losses—so you get shaken out before the real move happens. • Trade every setup you see—constantly in the market, paying spreads and commissions. Why? Because they have to make money off of someone. In other words: You become their exit liquidity. That's why conventional advice keeps retail traders active, confused and praying their next trade is profitable, while institutions become wealthy. — This is just a short clip from my recent 20-minute YouTube video. I also cover discussing the journaling method that actually improves your trading, how to spot fake gurus instantly and the simple technique that grew my account when I was a beginner. Just comment “TRADING” if you want to watch it and I’ll DM it to you immediately.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

34,599 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

.mert explains how Helius Rings will bring privacy to Solana “Helius Rings are a two-fold solution to privacy” “There's a public ring that anybody can use where everything is anonymous except for the to and from. This will have all sorts of DeFi integrations, from staking to trading, borrow and lend” “Trading means no MEV trading because you don't know the amounts” “There will also be customizable rings where institutions or neobanks can hide the to and from, make it fully anonymous and add any other requirement they want”
0:45

.mert explains how Helius Rings will bring privacy to Solana “Helius Rings are a two-fold solution to privacy” “There's a public ring that anybody can use where everything is anonymous except for the to and from. This will have all sorts of DeFi integrations, from staking to trading, borrow and lend” “Trading means no MEV trading because you don't know the amounts” “There will also be customizable rings where institutions or neobanks can hide the to and from, make it fully anonymous and add any other requirement they want”

Solana

287,905 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

𝐆𝐞𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐄𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐦𝐚 𝐃𝐀 - the first encrypted DA layer by Avail & encrypt.trade. This breakthrough upgrade to the Avail DA layer offers institutions privacy, verifiability and compliance with no trade-offs. Avail is the only solution that allows institutions to harness the power of blockchains without exposing sensitive data. Enigma encrypts rollup data before it hits the DA layer. - Public chains only see encrypted blobs - Recipients and regulators get permissioned access - ZK-proofs guarantee validity — no tradeoffs From trillion-dollar trades to patient records, Enigma is how institutions will go on-chain — securely. Read more about Enigma DA here:
0:20

𝐆𝐞𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐄𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐦𝐚 𝐃𝐀 - the first encrypted DA layer by Avail & encrypt.trade. This breakthrough upgrade to the Avail DA layer offers institutions privacy, verifiability and compliance with no trade-offs. Avail is the only solution that allows institutions to harness the power of blockchains without exposing sensitive data. Enigma encrypts rollup data before it hits the DA layer. - Public chains only see encrypted blobs - Recipients and regulators get permissioned access - ZK-proofs guarantee validity — no tradeoffs From trillion-dollar trades to patient records, Enigma is how institutions will go on-chain — securely. Read more about Enigma DA here:

Avail

100,567 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Excited to partner with Miden Not just because of what we're building together, but because we believe the future of on-chain finance should be both simple and private 🔐 Privacy isn't a feature. It's the foundation that makes on-chain finance actually usable. With Epoch & Miden, you get privacy on your terms 🤝
1:18

Excited to partner with Miden Not just because of what we're building together, but because we believe the future of on-chain finance should be both simple and private 🔐 Privacy isn't a feature. It's the foundation that makes on-chain finance actually usable. With Epoch & Miden, you get privacy on your terms 🤝

EPOCH🦇🔉

37,781 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Privacy is around the corner for XRP Ledger! XLS-96 Confidential Transfers authored by Aanchal Malhotra J. Ayo Akinyele and a list of other engineers. A native infrastructure feature to allow "Institutions to go from off chain to on chain " "Allows private amount distribution of assets among institutions" Initially tried to do with XRP but a better hybrid path was taken with issued assets. Privacy where it's needed and not a base case. I think thats the better path as well. Luc Bocahut and Ayo dived together with me in the new XRPL Preview series into this upcoming feature for the XRPL. With a sneak peek of what more to come on the privacy front to round up the tool kit and to achieve "hiding the transaction graph" ❤️ Very excited for privacy and i can't believe it's coming in a few weeks for voting.
10:21

Privacy is around the corner for XRP Ledger! XLS-96 Confidential Transfers authored by Aanchal Malhotra J. Ayo Akinyele and a list of other engineers. A native infrastructure feature to allow "Institutions to go from off chain to on chain " "Allows private amount distribution of assets among institutions" Initially tried to do with XRP but a better hybrid path was taken with issued assets. Privacy where it's needed and not a base case. I think thats the better path as well. Luc Bocahut and Ayo dived together with me in the new XRPL Preview series into this upcoming feature for the XRPL. With a sneak peek of what more to come on the privacy front to round up the tool kit and to achieve "hiding the transaction graph" ❤️ Very excited for privacy and i can't believe it's coming in a few weeks for voting.

Vet

40,711 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I generally like Auron, and have a good deal of sympathy for his world-view. But I'm still going to have to point out that this argument is based on two fundamental logic errors. The first takes the form "Y exists where X does not, therefore X does not cause Y." If that's to abstract for you, and you don't want to bother diagramming it out while you're lying on the couch scrolling your phone, let me give you a concrete example: "People die without being hit by trains, therefore being hit by a train doesn't kill you." When I put it like that, the messed up thinking is kinda obvious, isn't it? The second logic error is the strawman. I said Christianity failed. I never said Christianity caused the crisis of modernity. In fact, I explicitly said something totally else. I said that Christianity failed to prevent the crisis of modernity. I also pointed out that in many cases, it didn't even try. Now, technically, oak trees, ham sandwiches, synthetic diamonds, and the collected works of Gilbert and Sullivan also did not prevent the crisis of modernity. But, unlike these things, preventing that crisis was Christianity's job. This failure of leadership was a dereliction of the responsibilities that Christianity took on by claiming moral authority for 2000 years. You don't get to run around for 2000 years saying "I am the set of principles and institutions whereby you will set your values and order your life", only to wash your hands like Pilate when a challenge arises. Neither is it an excuse that "people stopped following Christ". Because if you know anything about leadership, you know that getting people to follow you is one of the responsibilities of a leader. You have to motivate them. That's your responsibility. You don't just get to have absolute power handed to you and then move people around like chess pieces. You have to inspire their trust. Young people didn't abandon Christianity in droves just "suddenly and for no reason at all". And, despite what angry young people say on Reddit, they also didn't leave because someone pointed a telescope at the sky and didn't see a big dude on a throne. Young people abandoned Christianity because its doctrines and institutions stopped providing them with the tools to solve their problems. Those institutions need to own that failure and correct it. Because shuffling around whining "it's not our fault" is not inspiring leadership. Auron wants society to give explicit and direct political power to Christian institutions once again. But what his body of work does not address is the history of how those institutions lost our trust in the first place. If you want the crown back, you have to be wise and noble leaders right now, where you are, with what you have. Not just make mouth noises about how you should be in charge, and things will be totally different than last time.
2:30

I generally like Auron, and have a good deal of sympathy for his world-view. But I'm still going to have to point out that this argument is based on two fundamental logic errors. The first takes the form "Y exists where X does not, therefore X does not cause Y." If that's to abstract for you, and you don't want to bother diagramming it out while you're lying on the couch scrolling your phone, let me give you a concrete example: "People die without being hit by trains, therefore being hit by a train doesn't kill you." When I put it like that, the messed up thinking is kinda obvious, isn't it? The second logic error is the strawman. I said Christianity failed. I never said Christianity caused the crisis of modernity. In fact, I explicitly said something totally else. I said that Christianity failed to prevent the crisis of modernity. I also pointed out that in many cases, it didn't even try. Now, technically, oak trees, ham sandwiches, synthetic diamonds, and the collected works of Gilbert and Sullivan also did not prevent the crisis of modernity. But, unlike these things, preventing that crisis was Christianity's job. This failure of leadership was a dereliction of the responsibilities that Christianity took on by claiming moral authority for 2000 years. You don't get to run around for 2000 years saying "I am the set of principles and institutions whereby you will set your values and order your life", only to wash your hands like Pilate when a challenge arises. Neither is it an excuse that "people stopped following Christ". Because if you know anything about leadership, you know that getting people to follow you is one of the responsibilities of a leader. You have to motivate them. That's your responsibility. You don't just get to have absolute power handed to you and then move people around like chess pieces. You have to inspire their trust. Young people didn't abandon Christianity in droves just "suddenly and for no reason at all". And, despite what angry young people say on Reddit, they also didn't leave because someone pointed a telescope at the sky and didn't see a big dude on a throne. Young people abandoned Christianity because its doctrines and institutions stopped providing them with the tools to solve their problems. Those institutions need to own that failure and correct it. Because shuffling around whining "it's not our fault" is not inspiring leadership. Auron wants society to give explicit and direct political power to Christian institutions once again. But what his body of work does not address is the history of how those institutions lost our trust in the first place. If you want the crown back, you have to be wise and noble leaders right now, where you are, with what you have. Not just make mouth noises about how you should be in charge, and things will be totally different than last time.

Devon Eriksen

27,215 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

AI makes intelligence digital. Crypto makes institutions digital. And if intelligence is becoming software, it’s going to need institutions that are software too. That intersection is where I’ve been spending most of my time, trying to understand, in the details, how these systems actually work: how consensus holds up, how markets are designed, how governance behaves under pressure, where privacy fits, and what tradeoffs all of it forces. But most conversation in the ecosystem stays at the level of narratives. The mechanism stays implicit. And if we’re serious about building institutions for digital intelligence, we can’t treat design like a black box. So I’m launching TheCoordinate, a long-form podcast with the researchers and builders pushing the frontier where blockchain and AI meet. Some have shaped major systems. Some wrote foundational papers. All of them are expanding what’s possible at the intersection of intelligence and institutions. The format is simple: each episode I pick a topic, do the homework (read the papers, study the systems), then sit down with the people doing the work and ask the real questions, especially the parts I’m genuinely confused about, until we can build a clear mental model. If you want rigorous conversations about how digital intelligence and digital institutions can co-evolve, subscribe to TheCoordinate. First episode tomorrow. 🎙️🔜
1:40

AI makes intelligence digital. Crypto makes institutions digital. And if intelligence is becoming software, it’s going to need institutions that are software too. That intersection is where I’ve been spending most of my time, trying to understand, in the details, how these systems actually work: how consensus holds up, how markets are designed, how governance behaves under pressure, where privacy fits, and what tradeoffs all of it forces. But most conversation in the ecosystem stays at the level of narratives. The mechanism stays implicit. And if we’re serious about building institutions for digital intelligence, we can’t treat design like a black box. So I’m launching TheCoordinate, a long-form podcast with the researchers and builders pushing the frontier where blockchain and AI meet. Some have shaped major systems. Some wrote foundational papers. All of them are expanding what’s possible at the intersection of intelligence and institutions. The format is simple: each episode I pick a topic, do the homework (read the papers, study the systems), then sit down with the people doing the work and ask the real questions, especially the parts I’m genuinely confused about, until we can build a clear mental model. If you want rigorous conversations about how digital intelligence and digital institutions can co-evolve, subscribe to TheCoordinate. First episode tomorrow. 🎙️🔜

Soubhik Deb

11,344 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce