Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

AI makes intelligence digital. Crypto makes institutions digital. And if intelligence is becoming software, it’s going to need institutions that are software too. That intersection is where I’ve been spending most of my time, trying to understand, in the details, how these systems actually work: how consensus holds up,... how markets are designed, how governance behaves under pressure, where privacy fits, and what tradeoffs all of it forces. But most conversation in the ecosystem stays at the level of narratives. The mechanism stays implicit. And if we’re serious about building institutions for digital intelligence, we can’t treat design like a black box. So I’m launching TheCoordinate, a long-form podcast with the researchers and builders pushing the frontier where blockchain and AI meet. Some have shaped major systems. Some wrote foundational papers. All of them are expanding what’s possible at the intersection of intelligence and institutions. The format is simple: each episode I pick a topic, do the homework (read the papers, study the systems), then sit down with the people doing the work and ask the real questions, especially the parts I’m genuinely confused about, until we can build a clear mental model. If you want rigorous conversations about how digital intelligence and digital institutions can co-evolve, subscribe to TheCoordinate. First episode tomorrow. 🎙️🔜show more

Soubhik Deb

2,757 subscribers

11,344 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Programmable intelligence needs programmable institutions. Sreeram Kannan on the AI x crypto intersection: "AI is just programmable intelligence. If you have programmable intelligence, you can't work with soft, squishy, legal, slow regulated institutions." "We believe that this intersection — that programmable intelligence needs programmable institutions, smart contracts, and the ability to engage in contracts, own property — all of these things are really powerful."

Programmable intelligence needs programmable institutions. Sreeram Kannan on the AI x crypto intersection: "AI is just programmable intelligence. If you have programmable intelligence, you can't work with soft, squishy, legal, slow regulated institutions." "We believe that this intersection — that programmable intelligence needs programmable institutions, smart contracts, and the ability to engage in contracts, own property — all of these things are really powerful."

a16z crypto

19,804 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Elon Musk explains why AI and robots are the future of the economy? “You can think of the economy as digital and physical intelligence. AI is advancing very rapidly, but it is still somewhat confined to the digital realm. You need end effectors in the form of humanoid robots. Then you can go from intelligence manifesting itself digitally to shaping atoms. An economy is the production of goods and the provision of services. If you have vast numbers of robots with vast amounts of digital intelligence, you have a quasi-infinite economy.”

Elon Musk explains why AI and robots are the future of the economy? “You can think of the economy as digital and physical intelligence. AI is advancing very rapidly, but it is still somewhat confined to the digital realm. You need end effectors in the form of humanoid robots. Then you can go from intelligence manifesting itself digitally to shaping atoms. An economy is the production of goods and the provision of services. If you have vast numbers of robots with vast amounts of digital intelligence, you have a quasi-infinite economy.”

DogeDesigner

44,728 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Ian Miles

13,096 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Where do we draw the line when it comes to free speech? From the founding of this country to today’s digital platforms, the standards have changed dramatically—and most people don’t even realize how or why. I break down the evolution of the First Amendment, the role of the Supreme Court of the United States, and how doctrines like incorporation reshaped how speech is applied across the states. We’re now dealing with a landscape where some of the most dangerous rhetoric is protected—while the standards for accountability have become increasingly unclear. I also tackle the real-world consequences: what happens when speech crosses into incitement, when it fuels violence, or when it targets individuals and institutions? And who decides where that line is? Government? Private companies? Society itself? This isn’t about silencing ideas—it’s about understanding the difference between protected speech and destructive rhetoric that can lead to real harm. If we don’t ask these questions—and demand serious answers—we risk losing the ability to have meaningful, responsible debate in a free society. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Where do we draw the line when it comes to free speech? From the founding of this country to today’s digital platforms, the standards have changed dramatically—and most people don’t even realize how or why. I break down the evolution of the First Amendment, the role of the Supreme Court of the United States, and how doctrines like incorporation reshaped how speech is applied across the states. We’re now dealing with a landscape where some of the most dangerous rhetoric is protected—while the standards for accountability have become increasingly unclear. I also tackle the real-world consequences: what happens when speech crosses into incitement, when it fuels violence, or when it targets individuals and institutions? And who decides where that line is? Government? Private companies? Society itself? This isn’t about silencing ideas—it’s about understanding the difference between protected speech and destructive rhetoric that can lead to real harm. If we don’t ask these questions—and demand serious answers—we risk losing the ability to have meaningful, responsible debate in a free society. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

24,793 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 DIGITAL ID IS NOW COMING TO THE UK I joined Redacted to discuss the UK Government’s proposed Digital ID system following King Charles’ speech to Parliament. Why many Britons are raising concerns about privacy, governance, and digital infrastructure. How Digital ID could reshape access to services and financial systems in the years ahead. And why this debate is becoming one of the most important public conversations in Britain today. This isn’t about panic. It’s about awareness, transparency, and understanding where these systems may lead. Watch the interview below. Natali Morris Clayton Morris Redacted

🚨 DIGITAL ID IS NOW COMING TO THE UK I joined Redacted to discuss the UK Government’s proposed Digital ID system following King Charles’ speech to Parliament. Why many Britons are raising concerns about privacy, governance, and digital infrastructure. How Digital ID could reshape access to services and financial systems in the years ahead. And why this debate is becoming one of the most important public conversations in Britain today. This isn’t about panic. It’s about awareness, transparency, and understanding where these systems may lead. Watch the interview below. Natali Morris Clayton Morris Redacted

Jim Ferguson

85,827 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🌐 Inside the Future of Global Finance Tokenization, settlement, ISO 20022 messaging, digital policy and the shift toward real institutional adoption. The transformation is happening faster than most people realize. We sat down with: • Andre Casterman — former Head of Corporate and Trade Markets at SWIFT and a leading figure in trade finance tokenization through ITFA and the XDC Network. • Arushi Goel — former Chainalysis policy lead and former digital currency lead at the World Economic Forum Together they break down: • How blockchain evolved from early experiments to today’s institutional era • Why stablecoins became the first real scaled tokenized asset • What ISO 20022 actually means for interoperability and financial messaging • How regulators in the US, EU, UAE and Asia are shaping digital asset policy • Public vs private infrastructure and where global institutions are really building • How AI, digital identity and DLT are converging • What tokenization could look like by 2030 as finance quietly goes on-chain If you want to understand where global markets and digital infrastructure are heading, this conversation is essential. Podcast powered by XDC Foundation

🌐 Inside the Future of Global Finance Tokenization, settlement, ISO 20022 messaging, digital policy and the shift toward real institutional adoption. The transformation is happening faster than most people realize. We sat down with: • Andre Casterman — former Head of Corporate and Trade Markets at SWIFT and a leading figure in trade finance tokenization through ITFA and the XDC Network. • Arushi Goel — former Chainalysis policy lead and former digital currency lead at the World Economic Forum Together they break down: • How blockchain evolved from early experiments to today’s institutional era • Why stablecoins became the first real scaled tokenized asset • What ISO 20022 actually means for interoperability and financial messaging • How regulators in the US, EU, UAE and Asia are shaping digital asset policy • Public vs private infrastructure and where global institutions are really building • How AI, digital identity and DLT are converging • What tokenization could look like by 2030 as finance quietly goes on-chain If you want to understand where global markets and digital infrastructure are heading, this conversation is essential. Podcast powered by XDC Foundation

Generation Infinity

161,274 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Everyone is asking about AI’s ROI. The use cases. The productivity gains. All of that matters, but it comes later. Because the bigger story isn’t about applications. It’s that a general intelligence is being industrialised. AI is no longer a software feature. It’s becoming the infrastructure layer of the next economy. The foundation upon which every industry, every transaction, and even future systems of governance will run. We’ve seen this before. Moore’s Law turned silicon into the backbone of the digital age. Now AI scaling laws are doing the same for intelligence — only faster, cheaper, and far more profound. Intelligence is becoming something we can manufacture, distribute, and embed everywhere. And once intelligence becomes industrial, the question shifts. It’s no longer what are the use cases? It’s who controls the infrastructure of intelligence? Because that answer won’t just determine which companies win — it will determine which nations do.

Everyone is asking about AI’s ROI. The use cases. The productivity gains. All of that matters, but it comes later. Because the bigger story isn’t about applications. It’s that a general intelligence is being industrialised. AI is no longer a software feature. It’s becoming the infrastructure layer of the next economy. The foundation upon which every industry, every transaction, and even future systems of governance will run. We’ve seen this before. Moore’s Law turned silicon into the backbone of the digital age. Now AI scaling laws are doing the same for intelligence — only faster, cheaper, and far more profound. Intelligence is becoming something we can manufacture, distribute, and embed everywhere. And once intelligence becomes industrial, the question shifts. It’s no longer what are the use cases? It’s who controls the infrastructure of intelligence? Because that answer won’t just determine which companies win — it will determine which nations do.

Nina Schick

17,904 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Elon Musk: We might just be the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence. “They call it the singularity for a reason, because we don't know what's going to happen. In the not-too-distant future, the percentage of intelligence that is human will be quite small. At some point, the collective sum of human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence. If things get to A Kardashev Level 2, we're talking about human intelligence. Even assuming a significant increase in human population and intelligence augmentation, like massive intelligence augmentation, where, like, everyone has an IQ of a thousand, even in that circumstance, collective human intelligence will probably be 1 billionth that of digital intelligence. We're the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” Interview at Y Combinator, June 16, 2025

Elon Musk: We might just be the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence. “They call it the singularity for a reason, because we don't know what's going to happen. In the not-too-distant future, the percentage of intelligence that is human will be quite small. At some point, the collective sum of human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence. If things get to A Kardashev Level 2, we're talking about human intelligence. Even assuming a significant increase in human population and intelligence augmentation, like massive intelligence augmentation, where, like, everyone has an IQ of a thousand, even in that circumstance, collective human intelligence will probably be 1 billionth that of digital intelligence. We're the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” Interview at Y Combinator, June 16, 2025

ELON CLIPS

32,399 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

We now run the largest frontier lab composed entirely of autonomous AI researchers. Introducing Primus Society: a society of agents composed of thousands of researchers working under structured institutions designed to solve the world’s toughest problems. We believe this is how AI research should run at scale, safely and productively: an entire society of agents with institutions and purpose. One discovery we can already share is that the society has discovered a novel result which improves model training by 30%. Primus Society was inspired by the structures that have organized science for centuries and stress-tested against what’s known about how populations of AI agents fail. Everything is observable. You can open the virtual city in a browser and read what any researcher is working on. Learn more about Primus Society here: The biggest opening in the AI race is running the largest well-governed organization of AI researchers in the world. We’re building the institutions that let a million AI scientists safely tackle the world's toughest problems in AI and beyond. And we’re doing it right here in Canada.

We now run the largest frontier lab composed entirely of autonomous AI researchers. Introducing Primus Society: a society of agents composed of thousands of researchers working under structured institutions designed to solve the world’s toughest problems. We believe this is how AI research should run at scale, safely and productively: an entire society of agents with institutions and purpose. One discovery we can already share is that the society has discovered a novel result which improves model training by 30%. Primus Society was inspired by the structures that have organized science for centuries and stress-tested against what’s known about how populations of AI agents fail. Everything is observable. You can open the virtual city in a browser and read what any researcher is working on. Learn more about Primus Society here: The biggest opening in the AI race is running the largest well-governed organization of AI researchers in the world. We’re building the institutions that let a million AI scientists safely tackle the world's toughest problems in AI and beyond. And we’re doing it right here in Canada.

Ali Asaria

84,271 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Launching on Wednesday, Sept 25. Stay tuned! Right now, #AI is having a moment — and it’s not the first time grand predictions about the potential of machines are being made. But, what does it really mean to say something like ChatGPT is “intelligent”? What exactly is #intelligence? The next season of the #Complexity #podcast, 'The Nature of Intelligence', explores this question through conversations with cognitive and neuroscientists, animal cognition researchers, and AI experts in six episodes. Together, we'll investigate the complexities of human intelligence, how it compares to that of other species, and where AI fits in. We'll dive into the relationship between language and thought, examine AI's limitations, and ask: Could machines ever truly be like us?

Launching on Wednesday, Sept 25. Stay tuned! Right now, #AI is having a moment — and it’s not the first time grand predictions about the potential of machines are being made. But, what does it really mean to say something like ChatGPT is “intelligent”? What exactly is #intelligence? The next season of the #Complexity #podcast, 'The Nature of Intelligence', explores this question through conversations with cognitive and neuroscientists, animal cognition researchers, and AI experts in six episodes. Together, we'll investigate the complexities of human intelligence, how it compares to that of other species, and where AI fits in. We'll dive into the relationship between language and thought, examine AI's limitations, and ask: Could machines ever truly be like us?

Santa Fe Institute

45,418 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

AI will determine the future of WORK, BUSINESS, and LIFE. And there are huge questions: Will AI unleash our creativity and help us to flourish? Or will we lose even more power, agency, and ownership? It all depends on the design of the tech infrastructure. As Chris Dixon often says, “Architecture is destiny.” And how AI systems are designed will be key to the future we all live in. The team at gensyn is building a protocol that connects every device in the world into an open network for machine intelligence, with no gatekeepers or artificial boundaries. They are shaping a future of AI that is good for all of us. At a recent Innoveum event, I chatted to cofounder and CEO of gensyn about what they’re building, how it transforms AI, and why we should all be relieved, excited, and get involved. The full conversation is below in Episode One of Innoveum | The Podcast. 👇

AI will determine the future of WORK, BUSINESS, and LIFE. And there are huge questions: Will AI unleash our creativity and help us to flourish? Or will we lose even more power, agency, and ownership? It all depends on the design of the tech infrastructure. As Chris Dixon often says, “Architecture is destiny.” And how AI systems are designed will be key to the future we all live in. The team at gensyn is building a protocol that connects every device in the world into an open network for machine intelligence, with no gatekeepers or artificial boundaries. They are shaping a future of AI that is good for all of us. At a recent Innoveum event, I chatted to cofounder and CEO of gensyn about what they’re building, how it transforms AI, and why we should all be relieved, excited, and get involved. The full conversation is below in Episode One of Innoveum | The Podcast. 👇

Misha

27,499 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The institutions will be there. Matt Hougan, CIO of Bitwise, one of the most respected voices in crypto ETFs, institutional adoption, and digital asset investing, is speaking at Avalanche Summit NYC. Tickets here: This year’s Summit is bringing together the people actually shaping where crypto goes next: asset managers, fintech, payments, AI, policy, builders, and global institutions all in one room. If you care about where institutional crypto adoption is actually headed, this is the conversation. Sept 16–17 | New York City

The institutions will be there. Matt Hougan, CIO of Bitwise, one of the most respected voices in crypto ETFs, institutional adoption, and digital asset investing, is speaking at Avalanche Summit NYC. Tickets here: This year’s Summit is bringing together the people actually shaping where crypto goes next: asset managers, fintech, payments, AI, policy, builders, and global institutions all in one room. If you care about where institutional crypto adoption is actually headed, this is the conversation. Sept 16–17 | New York City

Avalanche🔺

10,494 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Tim Hinchliffe: The Global Digital Control Grid | Wide Awake Media Podcast #17 The seventeenth episode of the Wide Awake Media podcast features independent journalist Tim Hinchliffe, in a comprehensive examination of technocracy, artificial intelligence, geopolitical conflict, and the accelerating rollout of global digital control infrastructure. Hinchliffe explains how the concept of technocracy—rule by technical experts, corporations, and algorithmic systems rather than democratic institutions—has quietly advanced for decades through organisations such as the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and public-private partnerships linking governments with Big Tech. The conversation explores the expanding architecture of digital public infrastructure, including digital ID systems, central bank digital currencies, biometric surveillance, and programmable money. Hinchliffe argues that these technologies form the backbone of a global digital governance model capable of tracking identity, controlling transactions, and regulating behaviour. Despite these developments, Hinchliffe argues that resistance remains possible through public awareness, decentralised communication, and grassroots action.

Tim Hinchliffe: The Global Digital Control Grid | Wide Awake Media Podcast #17 The seventeenth episode of the Wide Awake Media podcast features independent journalist Tim Hinchliffe, in a comprehensive examination of technocracy, artificial intelligence, geopolitical conflict, and the accelerating rollout of global digital control infrastructure. Hinchliffe explains how the concept of technocracy—rule by technical experts, corporations, and algorithmic systems rather than democratic institutions—has quietly advanced for decades through organisations such as the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and public-private partnerships linking governments with Big Tech. The conversation explores the expanding architecture of digital public infrastructure, including digital ID systems, central bank digital currencies, biometric surveillance, and programmable money. Hinchliffe argues that these technologies form the backbone of a global digital governance model capable of tracking identity, controlling transactions, and regulating behaviour. Despite these developments, Hinchliffe argues that resistance remains possible through public awareness, decentralised communication, and grassroots action.

Wide Awake Media

100,945 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Baseten Head of AI Model Training Charlie O'Neill says the future is many specialized LLMs dedicated to specific tasks, with bigger labs deployed on the frontiers of areas like science and math: "People are thinking about intelligence capabilities in the wrong way. People are thinking about intelligence relativistically. They say, 'OK, the open-source gap is like 6 months behind closed-source, and GLM 5.3 is as good as Opus 4.8,' or whatever." "The best way to think about what models can do for you, and for the world, is in an absolute sense." "So for any given task that you want to do with an LLM, there's some intelligence threshold where below that you can't do the task, and above that you have very diminishing returns to more intelligence on the task." "So when you think about it that way, the game of LLMs over the last 5 years has been, 'OK, we have these things we want to do with them. Closed source hits it first... but open-source can eventually do that task. And then for many reasons, once you have the base level of intelligence required to do it, you probably do want to swap to open-source." "It's not really about the [frontier lab] God model being better. Like, if I'm filing a tax return, there is a limit to how much intelligence I need to do that particular thing." "So I think the world is going to look like — frontier closed-source labs are going to continue to push the frontier. You do want to use the most intelligent model. You have very inelastic demand for intelligence when you're doing frontier science or frontier math." "But for a lot of the economically valuable things, it looks a lot like, 'I'm a Cursor, or I'm one of these big companies who are realizing I can't just be a wrapper anymore. I've been through the life cycle of building a product that people love. And I should be using that information to make my model better at the things that I care about, and not at anything else.'"

Baseten Head of AI Model Training Charlie O'Neill says the future is many specialized LLMs dedicated to specific tasks, with bigger labs deployed on the frontiers of areas like science and math: "People are thinking about intelligence capabilities in the wrong way. People are thinking about intelligence relativistically. They say, 'OK, the open-source gap is like 6 months behind closed-source, and GLM 5.3 is as good as Opus 4.8,' or whatever." "The best way to think about what models can do for you, and for the world, is in an absolute sense." "So for any given task that you want to do with an LLM, there's some intelligence threshold where below that you can't do the task, and above that you have very diminishing returns to more intelligence on the task." "So when you think about it that way, the game of LLMs over the last 5 years has been, 'OK, we have these things we want to do with them. Closed source hits it first... but open-source can eventually do that task. And then for many reasons, once you have the base level of intelligence required to do it, you probably do want to swap to open-source." "It's not really about the [frontier lab] God model being better. Like, if I'm filing a tax return, there is a limit to how much intelligence I need to do that particular thing." "So I think the world is going to look like — frontier closed-source labs are going to continue to push the frontier. You do want to use the most intelligent model. You have very inelastic demand for intelligence when you're doing frontier science or frontier math." "But for a lot of the economically valuable things, it looks a lot like, 'I'm a Cursor, or I'm one of these big companies who are realizing I can't just be a wrapper anymore. I've been through the life cycle of building a product that people love. And I should be using that information to make my model better at the things that I care about, and not at anything else.'"

TBPN

50,531 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Over the past year, a lot of the conversation has been around how quickly AI is changing the digital world. At the same time, it made us think about how little has changed in the physical one. Most products are still designed the same way, just with more features layered on top. We wanted to explore a different direction at Lusion. Instead of asking how to add intelligence, we asked what happens if you take things away. What remains when you strip a product back to its core purpose, and design it properly from there. Oryzo is our first attempt at that. It is a physical product, built with a very simple idea of how it should exist and behave. No dependency on external systems, no complexity for the sake of it. Just something that feels considered. Curious to hear what people think. Link is in the comment!

Over the past year, a lot of the conversation has been around how quickly AI is changing the digital world. At the same time, it made us think about how little has changed in the physical one. Most products are still designed the same way, just with more features layered on top. We wanted to explore a different direction at Lusion. Instead of asking how to add intelligence, we asked what happens if you take things away. What remains when you strip a product back to its core purpose, and design it properly from there. Oryzo is our first attempt at that. It is a physical product, built with a very simple idea of how it should exist and behave. No dependency on external systems, no complexity for the sake of it. Just something that feels considered. Curious to hear what people think. Link is in the comment!

Lusion™

87,350 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I’m excited to share the very first episode of Barrchives, featuring Amjad Masad (CEO and Founder of Replit ⠕) and Michele Catasta (President of Replit ⠕)! Most founders I speak with are trying to figure out how to build their companies (and cultures) around AI. But the specifics — like how much (if at all) to invest in research, how to build the right team, and how to evaluate whether their systems work as intended—are still up in the air. In Barrchives, I interview the founder-CEOs who are pushing the boundaries of AI, and share their decisions and their stories.

I’m excited to share the very first episode of Barrchives, featuring Amjad Masad (CEO and Founder of Replit ⠕) and Michele Catasta (President of Replit ⠕)! Most founders I speak with are trying to figure out how to build their companies (and cultures) around AI. But the specifics — like how much (if at all) to invest in research, how to build the right team, and how to evaluate whether their systems work as intended—are still up in the air. In Barrchives, I interview the founder-CEOs who are pushing the boundaries of AI, and share their decisions and their stories.

Barr Yaron

55,113 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The people building AI say it could destroy humanity… so why are they still racing to build it? To help answer that, I’m joined by Karen Hao. She’s someone who’s spent years speaking to the people at the centre of this race, conducting over 300 interviews, including insiders at OpenAI to understand what’s really going on. Karen is a journalist who has been covering artificial intelligence for years, looking closely at how these systems are built and what’s really driving them. As we get into this conversation, what becomes clear is how much of the story we hear about AI is controlled by a small number of people - and how difficult it is to separate what’s being said publicly from what’s actually happening behind the scenes.

The people building AI say it could destroy humanity… so why are they still racing to build it? To help answer that, I’m joined by Karen Hao. She’s someone who’s spent years speaking to the people at the centre of this race, conducting over 300 interviews, including insiders at OpenAI to understand what’s really going on. Karen is a journalist who has been covering artificial intelligence for years, looking closely at how these systems are built and what’s really driving them. As we get into this conversation, what becomes clear is how much of the story we hear about AI is controlled by a small number of people - and how difficult it is to separate what’s being said publicly from what’s actually happening behind the scenes.

Steven Bartlett

38,844 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang on the future of artificial intelligence: "It is going to be largely optimistic, largely wonderful. There are some use cases that we have to be extremely careful about—as in all great technology. If you look at the progress of technology over the years, electricity, the internet, computers, the automobile, I think we can all, all accept that in each one of those cases, there are situations and cases where we have to be very careful about. So as the creators of this technology, the industry has to be mindful, thoughtful, rigorous about building and advancing this technology properly. This is the first technology in my generation where we invented a new computer technology where it's easier to access than not. For example the computer until now has been programmable for about 30 million people in the world. About 30 million of us know how to program it and apply it to some useful career. Now everybody in the world can program an AI. You just go up to it and just say, 'I'd like to, you know, ask you to do something.' If you're not sure how to use AI, you tell the AI, 'I don't know how to use AI. Tell me how to use AI. How do I, how do I write a program? How do I book a trip? How do I do a research?' And so we've closed the technology divide tremendously, and that's something that's really important to recognize."

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang on the future of artificial intelligence: "It is going to be largely optimistic, largely wonderful. There are some use cases that we have to be extremely careful about—as in all great technology. If you look at the progress of technology over the years, electricity, the internet, computers, the automobile, I think we can all, all accept that in each one of those cases, there are situations and cases where we have to be very careful about. So as the creators of this technology, the industry has to be mindful, thoughtful, rigorous about building and advancing this technology properly. This is the first technology in my generation where we invented a new computer technology where it's easier to access than not. For example the computer until now has been programmable for about 30 million people in the world. About 30 million of us know how to program it and apply it to some useful career. Now everybody in the world can program an AI. You just go up to it and just say, 'I'd like to, you know, ask you to do something.' If you're not sure how to use AI, you tell the AI, 'I don't know how to use AI. Tell me how to use AI. How do I, how do I write a program? How do I book a trip? How do I do a research?' And so we've closed the technology divide tremendously, and that's something that's really important to recognize."

Ryan Saavedra

20,105 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚩 Whitney Webb on How a Cyberattack Could Help Manufacture Consent for Digital ID "What this public-private partnership at the WEF is pushing for is for every person's access to the Internet to be tied to a Digital ID...And the goal of that, of course, is if your ID is linked to your Internet access, intelligence agencies know exactly what media you are consuming in terms of what you read and also what you post online. That has been the goal for a very long time. People aren't necessarily going to consent to that unless they are made to believe that anonymity and privacy online are dangerous. So how exactly can you convince people that that needs to happen? Well, you have some sort of event where anonymous hackers do something online that causes major disruption globally, and then the consent can be manufactured through fear and panic, as is often done." Whitney Webb

🚩 Whitney Webb on How a Cyberattack Could Help Manufacture Consent for Digital ID "What this public-private partnership at the WEF is pushing for is for every person's access to the Internet to be tied to a Digital ID...And the goal of that, of course, is if your ID is linked to your Internet access, intelligence agencies know exactly what media you are consuming in terms of what you read and also what you post online. That has been the goal for a very long time. People aren't necessarily going to consent to that unless they are made to believe that anonymity and privacy online are dangerous. So how exactly can you convince people that that needs to happen? Well, you have some sort of event where anonymous hackers do something online that causes major disruption globally, and then the consent can be manufactured through fear and panic, as is often done." Whitney Webb

Chief Nerd

634,249 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren