Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

AI makes intelligence digital. Crypto makes institutions digital. And if intelligence is becoming software, it’s going to need institutions that are software too. That intersection is where I’ve been spending most of my time, trying to understand, in the details, how these systems actually work: how consensus holds up,...

soubhik_deb's profile picture

Soubhik Deb

2,757 subscribers

11,344 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Programmable intelligence needs programmable institutions. Sreeram Kannan on the AI x crypto intersection: "AI is just programmable intelligence. If you have programmable intelligence, you can't work with soft, squishy, legal, slow regulated institutions." "We believe that this intersection — that programmable intelligence needs programmable institutions, smart contracts, and the ability to engage in contracts, own property — all of these things are really powerful."
0:30

Programmable intelligence needs programmable institutions. Sreeram Kannan on the AI x crypto intersection: "AI is just programmable intelligence. If you have programmable intelligence, you can't work with soft, squishy, legal, slow regulated institutions." "We believe that this intersection — that programmable intelligence needs programmable institutions, smart contracts, and the ability to engage in contracts, own property — all of these things are really powerful."

a16z crypto

19,339 views • 23 days ago

There is consensus among AI systems about the best form of money for the Age of Digital Intelligence:
1:55

There is consensus among AI systems about the best form of money for the Age of Digital Intelligence:

Natalie Brunell ⚡️

39,592 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.
2:54

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Ian Miles Cheong

13,080 views • 4 months ago

Where do we draw the line when it comes to free speech? From the founding of this country to today’s digital platforms, the standards have changed dramatically—and most people don’t even realize how or why. I break down the evolution of the First Amendment, the role of the Supreme Court of the United States, and how doctrines like incorporation reshaped how speech is applied across the states. We’re now dealing with a landscape where some of the most dangerous rhetoric is protected—while the standards for accountability have become increasingly unclear. I also tackle the real-world consequences: what happens when speech crosses into incitement, when it fuels violence, or when it targets individuals and institutions? And who decides where that line is? Government? Private companies? Society itself? This isn’t about silencing ideas—it’s about understanding the difference between protected speech and destructive rhetoric that can lead to real harm. If we don’t ask these questions—and demand serious answers—we risk losing the ability to have meaningful, responsible debate in a free society. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:
7:27

Where do we draw the line when it comes to free speech? From the founding of this country to today’s digital platforms, the standards have changed dramatically—and most people don’t even realize how or why. I break down the evolution of the First Amendment, the role of the Supreme Court of the United States, and how doctrines like incorporation reshaped how speech is applied across the states. We’re now dealing with a landscape where some of the most dangerous rhetoric is protected—while the standards for accountability have become increasingly unclear. I also tackle the real-world consequences: what happens when speech crosses into incitement, when it fuels violence, or when it targets individuals and institutions? And who decides where that line is? Government? Private companies? Society itself? This isn’t about silencing ideas—it’s about understanding the difference between protected speech and destructive rhetoric that can lead to real harm. If we don’t ask these questions—and demand serious answers—we risk losing the ability to have meaningful, responsible debate in a free society. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

24,603 views • 1 month ago

🚨 DIGITAL ID IS NOW COMING TO THE UK I joined Redacted to discuss the UK Government’s proposed Digital ID system following King Charles’ speech to Parliament. Why many Britons are raising concerns about privacy, governance, and digital infrastructure. How Digital ID could reshape access to services and financial systems in the years ahead. And why this debate is becoming one of the most important public conversations in Britain today. This isn’t about panic. It’s about awareness, transparency, and understanding where these systems may lead. Watch the interview below. Natali Morris Clayton Morris Redacted
13:04

🚨 DIGITAL ID IS NOW COMING TO THE UK I joined Redacted to discuss the UK Government’s proposed Digital ID system following King Charles’ speech to Parliament. Why many Britons are raising concerns about privacy, governance, and digital infrastructure. How Digital ID could reshape access to services and financial systems in the years ahead. And why this debate is becoming one of the most important public conversations in Britain today. This isn’t about panic. It’s about awareness, transparency, and understanding where these systems may lead. Watch the interview below. Natali Morris Clayton Morris Redacted

Jim Ferguson

73,716 views • 1 month ago

🌐 Inside the Future of Global Finance Tokenization, settlement, ISO 20022 messaging, digital policy and the shift toward real institutional adoption. The transformation is happening faster than most people realize. We sat down with: • Andre Casterman — former Head of Corporate and Trade Markets at SWIFT and a leading figure in trade finance tokenization through ITFA and the XDC Network. • Arushi Goel — former Chainalysis policy lead and former digital currency lead at the World Economic Forum Together they break down: • How blockchain evolved from early experiments to today’s institutional era • Why stablecoins became the first real scaled tokenized asset • What ISO 20022 actually means for interoperability and financial messaging • How regulators in the US, EU, UAE and Asia are shaping digital asset policy • Public vs private infrastructure and where global institutions are really building • How AI, digital identity and DLT are converging • What tokenization could look like by 2030 as finance quietly goes on-chain If you want to understand where global markets and digital infrastructure are heading, this conversation is essential. Podcast powered by XDC Foundation
57:42

🌐 Inside the Future of Global Finance Tokenization, settlement, ISO 20022 messaging, digital policy and the shift toward real institutional adoption. The transformation is happening faster than most people realize. We sat down with: • Andre Casterman — former Head of Corporate and Trade Markets at SWIFT and a leading figure in trade finance tokenization through ITFA and the XDC Network. • Arushi Goel — former Chainalysis policy lead and former digital currency lead at the World Economic Forum Together they break down: • How blockchain evolved from early experiments to today’s institutional era • Why stablecoins became the first real scaled tokenized asset • What ISO 20022 actually means for interoperability and financial messaging • How regulators in the US, EU, UAE and Asia are shaping digital asset policy • Public vs private infrastructure and where global institutions are really building • How AI, digital identity and DLT are converging • What tokenization could look like by 2030 as finance quietly goes on-chain If you want to understand where global markets and digital infrastructure are heading, this conversation is essential. Podcast powered by XDC Foundation

Generation Infinity

161,185 views • 6 months ago

Everyone is asking about AI’s ROI. The use cases. The productivity gains. All of that matters, but it comes later. Because the bigger story isn’t about applications. It’s that a general intelligence is being industrialised. AI is no longer a software feature. It’s becoming the infrastructure layer of the next economy. The foundation upon which every industry, every transaction, and even future systems of governance will run. We’ve seen this before. Moore’s Law turned silicon into the backbone of the digital age. Now AI scaling laws are doing the same for intelligence — only faster, cheaper, and far more profound. Intelligence is becoming something we can manufacture, distribute, and embed everywhere. And once intelligence becomes industrial, the question shifts. It’s no longer what are the use cases? It’s who controls the infrastructure of intelligence? Because that answer won’t just determine which companies win — it will determine which nations do.
0:26

Everyone is asking about AI’s ROI. The use cases. The productivity gains. All of that matters, but it comes later. Because the bigger story isn’t about applications. It’s that a general intelligence is being industrialised. AI is no longer a software feature. It’s becoming the infrastructure layer of the next economy. The foundation upon which every industry, every transaction, and even future systems of governance will run. We’ve seen this before. Moore’s Law turned silicon into the backbone of the digital age. Now AI scaling laws are doing the same for intelligence — only faster, cheaper, and far more profound. Intelligence is becoming something we can manufacture, distribute, and embed everywhere. And once intelligence becomes industrial, the question shifts. It’s no longer what are the use cases? It’s who controls the infrastructure of intelligence? Because that answer won’t just determine which companies win — it will determine which nations do.

Nina Schick

17,897 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk: We might just be the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence. “They call it the singularity for a reason, because we don't know what's going to happen. In the not-too-distant future, the percentage of intelligence that is human will be quite small. At some point, the collective sum of human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence. If things get to A Kardashev Level 2, we're talking about human intelligence. Even assuming a significant increase in human population and intelligence augmentation, like massive intelligence augmentation, where, like, everyone has an IQ of a thousand, even in that circumstance, collective human intelligence will probably be 1 billionth that of digital intelligence. We're the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” Interview at Y Combinator, June 16, 2025
0:41

Elon Musk: We might just be the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence. “They call it the singularity for a reason, because we don't know what's going to happen. In the not-too-distant future, the percentage of intelligence that is human will be quite small. At some point, the collective sum of human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence. If things get to A Kardashev Level 2, we're talking about human intelligence. Even assuming a significant increase in human population and intelligence augmentation, like massive intelligence augmentation, where, like, everyone has an IQ of a thousand, even in that circumstance, collective human intelligence will probably be 1 billionth that of digital intelligence. We're the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” Interview at Y Combinator, June 16, 2025

ELON CLIPS

32,399 views • 3 months ago

Launching on Wednesday, Sept 25. Stay tuned! Right now, #AI is having a moment — and it’s not the first time grand predictions about the potential of machines are being made. But, what does it really mean to say something like ChatGPT is “intelligent”? What exactly is #intelligence? The next season of the #Complexity #podcast, 'The Nature of Intelligence', explores this question through conversations with cognitive and neuroscientists, animal cognition researchers, and AI experts in six episodes. Together, we'll investigate the complexities of human intelligence, how it compares to that of other species, and where AI fits in. We'll dive into the relationship between language and thought, examine AI's limitations, and ask: Could machines ever truly be like us?
3:00

Launching on Wednesday, Sept 25. Stay tuned! Right now, #AI is having a moment — and it’s not the first time grand predictions about the potential of machines are being made. But, what does it really mean to say something like ChatGPT is “intelligent”? What exactly is #intelligence? The next season of the #Complexity #podcast, 'The Nature of Intelligence', explores this question through conversations with cognitive and neuroscientists, animal cognition researchers, and AI experts in six episodes. Together, we'll investigate the complexities of human intelligence, how it compares to that of other species, and where AI fits in. We'll dive into the relationship between language and thought, examine AI's limitations, and ask: Could machines ever truly be like us?

Santa Fe Institute

45,366 views • 1 year ago

The institutions will be there. Matt Hougan, CIO of Bitwise, one of the most respected voices in crypto ETFs, institutional adoption, and digital asset investing, is speaking at Avalanche Summit NYC. Tickets here: This year’s Summit is bringing together the people actually shaping where crypto goes next: asset managers, fintech, payments, AI, policy, builders, and global institutions all in one room. If you care about where institutional crypto adoption is actually headed, this is the conversation. Sept 16–17 | New York City
0:29

The institutions will be there. Matt Hougan, CIO of Bitwise, one of the most respected voices in crypto ETFs, institutional adoption, and digital asset investing, is speaking at Avalanche Summit NYC. Tickets here: This year’s Summit is bringing together the people actually shaping where crypto goes next: asset managers, fintech, payments, AI, policy, builders, and global institutions all in one room. If you care about where institutional crypto adoption is actually headed, this is the conversation. Sept 16–17 | New York City

Avalanche🔺

10,330 views • 17 days ago

AI will determine the future of WORK, BUSINESS, and LIFE. And there are huge questions: Will AI unleash our creativity and help us to flourish? Or will we lose even more power, agency, and ownership? It all depends on the design of the tech infrastructure. As Chris Dixon often says, “Architecture is destiny.” And how AI systems are designed will be key to the future we all live in. The team at gensyn is building a protocol that connects every device in the world into an open network for machine intelligence, with no gatekeepers or artificial boundaries. They are shaping a future of AI that is good for all of us. At a recent Innoveum event, I chatted to cofounder and CEO of gensyn about what they’re building, how it transforms AI, and why we should all be relieved, excited, and get involved. The full conversation is below in Episode One of Innoveum | The Podcast. 👇
1:14:00

AI will determine the future of WORK, BUSINESS, and LIFE. And there are huge questions: Will AI unleash our creativity and help us to flourish? Or will we lose even more power, agency, and ownership? It all depends on the design of the tech infrastructure. As Chris Dixon often says, “Architecture is destiny.” And how AI systems are designed will be key to the future we all live in. The team at gensyn is building a protocol that connects every device in the world into an open network for machine intelligence, with no gatekeepers or artificial boundaries. They are shaping a future of AI that is good for all of us. At a recent Innoveum event, I chatted to cofounder and CEO of gensyn about what they’re building, how it transforms AI, and why we should all be relieved, excited, and get involved. The full conversation is below in Episode One of Innoveum | The Podcast. 👇

Misha

27,481 views • 1 year ago

Tim Hinchliffe: The Global Digital Control Grid | Wide Awake Media Podcast #17 The seventeenth episode of the Wide Awake Media podcast features independent journalist Tim Hinchliffe, in a comprehensive examination of technocracy, artificial intelligence, geopolitical conflict, and the accelerating rollout of global digital control infrastructure. Hinchliffe explains how the concept of technocracy—rule by technical experts, corporations, and algorithmic systems rather than democratic institutions—has quietly advanced for decades through organisations such as the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and public-private partnerships linking governments with Big Tech. The conversation explores the expanding architecture of digital public infrastructure, including digital ID systems, central bank digital currencies, biometric surveillance, and programmable money. Hinchliffe argues that these technologies form the backbone of a global digital governance model capable of tracking identity, controlling transactions, and regulating behaviour. Despite these developments, Hinchliffe argues that resistance remains possible through public awareness, decentralised communication, and grassroots action.
1:03:30

Tim Hinchliffe: The Global Digital Control Grid | Wide Awake Media Podcast #17 The seventeenth episode of the Wide Awake Media podcast features independent journalist Tim Hinchliffe, in a comprehensive examination of technocracy, artificial intelligence, geopolitical conflict, and the accelerating rollout of global digital control infrastructure. Hinchliffe explains how the concept of technocracy—rule by technical experts, corporations, and algorithmic systems rather than democratic institutions—has quietly advanced for decades through organisations such as the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and public-private partnerships linking governments with Big Tech. The conversation explores the expanding architecture of digital public infrastructure, including digital ID systems, central bank digital currencies, biometric surveillance, and programmable money. Hinchliffe argues that these technologies form the backbone of a global digital governance model capable of tracking identity, controlling transactions, and regulating behaviour. Despite these developments, Hinchliffe argues that resistance remains possible through public awareness, decentralised communication, and grassroots action.

Wide Awake Media

100,945 views • 2 months ago

I’m excited to share the very first episode of Barrchives, featuring Amjad Masad (CEO and Founder of Replit ⠕) and Michele Catasta (President of Replit ⠕)! Most founders I speak with are trying to figure out how to build their companies (and cultures) around AI. But the specifics — like how much (if at all) to invest in research, how to build the right team, and how to evaluate whether their systems work as intended—are still up in the air. In Barrchives, I interview the founder-CEOs who are pushing the boundaries of AI, and share their decisions and their stories.
1:04

I’m excited to share the very first episode of Barrchives, featuring Amjad Masad (CEO and Founder of Replit ⠕) and Michele Catasta (President of Replit ⠕)! Most founders I speak with are trying to figure out how to build their companies (and cultures) around AI. But the specifics — like how much (if at all) to invest in research, how to build the right team, and how to evaluate whether their systems work as intended—are still up in the air. In Barrchives, I interview the founder-CEOs who are pushing the boundaries of AI, and share their decisions and their stories.

Barr Yaron

55,061 views • 1 year ago

NEW - Bret Weinstein pushes back against Douglas Murray: "If you start bullying people into what they can say... You are going to create a backlash.... Whereas allowing people to say what they will say and hashing it out in the marketplace of ideas... allows us to reveal why a perspective isn't any good." "The number of places where simple race rage does not predict the Nazi behavior was substantial. And the question is, what are we to do with that? It actually raises interesting questions about what the genocide that the Nazis perpetrated was about... There was something else going on in the third reich. The answer is that we talk about that stuff. That's how we figure it out. Should we do that in podcasts? No, that's not the right place to do it. But in the absence of institutions that know how to do it, podcasts are a decent substitute... So yeah, let's build the institutions... But they can't be institutions that have a higher purpose than truth seeking. That has to be the higher purpose of any institution that's going to be capable of doing the job. And until we have institutions that have that as their highest aim, we're going to do that on podcasts. Sorry, Douglas."
2:51

NEW - Bret Weinstein pushes back against Douglas Murray: "If you start bullying people into what they can say... You are going to create a backlash.... Whereas allowing people to say what they will say and hashing it out in the marketplace of ideas... allows us to reveal why a perspective isn't any good." "The number of places where simple race rage does not predict the Nazi behavior was substantial. And the question is, what are we to do with that? It actually raises interesting questions about what the genocide that the Nazis perpetrated was about... There was something else going on in the third reich. The answer is that we talk about that stuff. That's how we figure it out. Should we do that in podcasts? No, that's not the right place to do it. But in the absence of institutions that know how to do it, podcasts are a decent substitute... So yeah, let's build the institutions... But they can't be institutions that have a higher purpose than truth seeking. That has to be the higher purpose of any institution that's going to be capable of doing the job. And until we have institutions that have that as their highest aim, we're going to do that on podcasts. Sorry, Douglas."

Ava Petrucci

110,287 views • 1 year ago

Privacy isn’t optional infrastructure. It’s why systems endure. 🔐 On the latest episode of #Unshielded, Nic Cary (Blockchain) breaks down why privacy sits at the intersection of trust and innovation in crypto, and what’s next for institutions, RWAs, and AI-driven payments. 🎧 Full episode:
0:49

Privacy isn’t optional infrastructure. It’s why systems endure. 🔐 On the latest episode of #Unshielded, Nic Cary (Blockchain) breaks down why privacy sits at the intersection of trust and innovation in crypto, and what’s next for institutions, RWAs, and AI-driven payments. 🎧 Full episode:

Midnight

13,146 views • 6 months ago

Over the past year, a lot of the conversation has been around how quickly AI is changing the digital world. At the same time, it made us think about how little has changed in the physical one. Most products are still designed the same way, just with more features layered on top. We wanted to explore a different direction at Lusion. Instead of asking how to add intelligence, we asked what happens if you take things away. What remains when you strip a product back to its core purpose, and design it properly from there. Oryzo is our first attempt at that. It is a physical product, built with a very simple idea of how it should exist and behave. No dependency on external systems, no complexity for the sake of it. Just something that feels considered. Curious to hear what people think. Link is in the comment!
1:02

Over the past year, a lot of the conversation has been around how quickly AI is changing the digital world. At the same time, it made us think about how little has changed in the physical one. Most products are still designed the same way, just with more features layered on top. We wanted to explore a different direction at Lusion. Instead of asking how to add intelligence, we asked what happens if you take things away. What remains when you strip a product back to its core purpose, and design it properly from there. Oryzo is our first attempt at that. It is a physical product, built with a very simple idea of how it should exist and behave. No dependency on external systems, no complexity for the sake of it. Just something that feels considered. Curious to hear what people think. Link is in the comment!

Lusion™

86,335 views • 2 months ago

The people building AI say it could destroy humanity… so why are they still racing to build it? To help answer that, I’m joined by Karen Hao. She’s someone who’s spent years speaking to the people at the centre of this race, conducting over 300 interviews, including insiders at OpenAI to understand what’s really going on. Karen is a journalist who has been covering artificial intelligence for years, looking closely at how these systems are built and what’s really driving them. As we get into this conversation, what becomes clear is how much of the story we hear about AI is controlled by a small number of people - and how difficult it is to separate what’s being said publicly from what’s actually happening behind the scenes.
1:49

The people building AI say it could destroy humanity… so why are they still racing to build it? To help answer that, I’m joined by Karen Hao. She’s someone who’s spent years speaking to the people at the centre of this race, conducting over 300 interviews, including insiders at OpenAI to understand what’s really going on. Karen is a journalist who has been covering artificial intelligence for years, looking closely at how these systems are built and what’s really driving them. As we get into this conversation, what becomes clear is how much of the story we hear about AI is controlled by a small number of people - and how difficult it is to separate what’s being said publicly from what’s actually happening behind the scenes.

Steven Bartlett

38,303 views • 2 months ago

BANNON ON IT'S A TIME FOR CHOOSING NOW: 'In that arc of looking at how the Deep state has tried to stop Trump and the MAGA movement, you can easily fit in. The Epstein situation. --- Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things, not just individuals, but also Institutions, Intelligence, Institutions, Foreign Governments, and who was working with him on our Intelligence Apparatus and in our Government.'
1:46

BANNON ON IT'S A TIME FOR CHOOSING NOW: 'In that arc of looking at how the Deep state has tried to stop Trump and the MAGA movement, you can easily fit in. The Epstein situation. --- Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things, not just individuals, but also Institutions, Intelligence, Institutions, Foreign Governments, and who was working with him on our Intelligence Apparatus and in our Government.'

Bannon’s WarRoom

69,744 views • 11 months ago

🚩 Whitney Webb on How a Cyberattack Could Help Manufacture Consent for Digital ID "What this public-private partnership at the WEF is pushing for is for every person's access to the Internet to be tied to a Digital ID...And the goal of that, of course, is if your ID is linked to your Internet access, intelligence agencies know exactly what media you are consuming in terms of what you read and also what you post online. That has been the goal for a very long time. People aren't necessarily going to consent to that unless they are made to believe that anonymity and privacy online are dangerous. So how exactly can you convince people that that needs to happen? Well, you have some sort of event where anonymous hackers do something online that causes major disruption globally, and then the consent can be manufactured through fear and panic, as is often done." Whitney Webb @TheRedactedInc
5:30

🚩 Whitney Webb on How a Cyberattack Could Help Manufacture Consent for Digital ID "What this public-private partnership at the WEF is pushing for is for every person's access to the Internet to be tied to a Digital ID...And the goal of that, of course, is if your ID is linked to your Internet access, intelligence agencies know exactly what media you are consuming in terms of what you read and also what you post online. That has been the goal for a very long time. People aren't necessarily going to consent to that unless they are made to believe that anonymity and privacy online are dangerous. So how exactly can you convince people that that needs to happen? Well, you have some sort of event where anonymous hackers do something online that causes major disruption globally, and then the consent can be manufactured through fear and panic, as is often done." Whitney Webb @TheRedactedInc

Chief Nerd

633,781 views • 2 years ago

Box CEO Aaron Levie: The Cost of Intelligence Will Go to Zero "We now have an API into intelligence. The cost of that intelligence will go down to the cost of the bare metal. Whatever the underlying cost of the GPU is, that's what you're going to pay with a little bit of margin. Then it's all about if you can build software that takes this complicated technology and delivers it to customers to solve real world problems." Aaron Levie discussing the future of AI on Y Combinator's Lightcone Podcast
1:41

Box CEO Aaron Levie: The Cost of Intelligence Will Go to Zero "We now have an API into intelligence. The cost of that intelligence will go down to the cost of the bare metal. Whatever the underlying cost of the GPU is, that's what you're going to pay with a little bit of margin. Then it's all about if you can build software that takes this complicated technology and delivers it to customers to solve real world problems." Aaron Levie discussing the future of AI on Y Combinator's Lightcone Podcast

Overlap: Business & Tech

16,591 views • 1 year ago