正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

BJP’S INNOCENT ACT COLLAPSES UNDER ITS OWN ABUSE RECORD 🚨 SUDHANSHU: These children learned such language from Congress. CHITRA: Abusive children must be corrected. SUNIL: Millions protested peacefully. Do not condemn an entire generation for ten voices. CHITRA: One fish can spoil the pond. SUNIL 🎯: Absolutely. One bad...

89,549 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Yesterday on ITV’s Loose Women , I shared about a judge threatening a rape survivor. He said that if she continued with her allegations, her child would be taken into care. It was a chilling abuse of power—and a horrific example of how deeply broken our family court system truly is. Worse still, incidents like these are not isolated. I share several examples of survivors facing harm in the courtroom in my book, He Said She Said. But family court judges operate with judicial immunity, meaning they cannot be held personally accountable, even when their decisions cause direct harm. Survivors of abuse (many already re-traumatised by the legal process) are left with no recourse when the very institution meant to protect their children instead threatens to punish them for speaking the truth. In one case I represented, a mother, a rape survivor, was forced to fight for her daughter’s safety when CAFCASS recommended unsupervised contact between the child and father, convicted serial rapist Kristoffer Paul Arthur White. Why? Because the family court system clings to the misguided presumption that a child’s contact with any parent, even one proven to be abusive, is better than no contact at all. As someone who grew up in a home shadowed by domestic abuse and alcoholism, I can say with absolute certainty: no parent is far better than an abusive one. The current system prioritises the rights of abusers to maintain control, rather than the rights of children to be safe and of mothers to be believed. This has to change. We need a family court system that listens to survivors, holds judges accountable, and stops endangering children and survivors through a pro-contact culture. We owe survivors better. We owe children better. We need to continue speaking out until the system is no longer a silent accomplice to abuse.

Dr Charlotte Proudman

29,844 次观看 • 1 年前

ஒத்த ரோசா K.Annamalai ! புள்ளைய நல்லா வளத்திருக்கமா ! See the filthy language used by the State Coordinator of #WTL. Now imagine what kind of language their ordinary cadres must be using. This is the real colour of #Annamalai avl and his organisation, “We The Leaders”. Abusing people, spreading vengeance, and defaming others seems to be all they are interested in. Apart from that, what else are they doing? If I had not responded to them properly, this real colour would never have come out. For a long time, several BJP cadres have been saying that WTL members have been posting abusive content against Shri Narendra Modi ji and smt Nirmala Sitharaman ji. Yesterday, in my press meet, I clearly said that I had filed a complaint against those responsible for these abusive posts. I also said that an FIR had been registered against one of them based on my complaint. Only after I publicly stated this fact did they come forward and acknowledge it. Now, they have even instructed their cadres to delete the abusive posts against Shri Narendra Modi ji from social media. But they have still not asked them to delete the abusive posts against smt Nirmala Sitharaman ji. Annamalai ji pretends to be a decent and dignified person, while the organisation he runs is busy spreading all this nasty stuff. So Mr K.Annamalai If this is what you call “We The Leaders”, then perhaps it is time to change the name. “We The Loafers” sounds more appropriate! Nitin Nabin B L Santhosh

Ashvathaman Allimuthu

95,844 次观看 • 10 天前

VIDEO | Activist and psephologist Yogendra Yadav, who was a litigant in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) case before the Supreme Court, said, "As one of the litigants, I have reasons to be disappointed, but I am shocked. Not shocked only because I was litigant and the judgment did not go in my favor. That can happen. Not shocked because I had expected a very different judgment. For the last few months, the course, the very strange course that this particular case had taken, made it absolutely clear which way things were going. I'm shocked that the Supreme Court of this country has allowed the fundamental democratic principle to be overturned. In a democracy, voters choose the government. The government cannot choose the voters. And the net effect of what the Supreme Court has done today is that now BJP shall decide who can be a voter in this country and who cannot. Technically, you might say Election Commission will decide. But because the same Supreme Court has done absolutely nothing to ensure that the Election Commission's own appointment is a non-partisan way, and given the manner in which the Election Commission behaves these days, it is absolutely true that now BJP decides who will be the voter, and on the basis of their votes, BJP will say, "We have one popular mandate." This is a complete overturning of the fundamental principle of universal adult franchise...I'm astonished that the Supreme Court of India has put its seal of approval on fundamental overturning of democratic principles."

Press Trust of India

75,188 次观看 • 4 个月前

Dear Milords, A few questions for you: 1) Circumcision/Hijab/Christian Traditions - Circumcision: A Muslim child gets circumcised before the age of 7. Does he go through the process of his own will? If not, doesn't it qualify as child abuse? - Hijab: What about hijab? Courts have repeatedly said that a girl has the right to choose to wear a hijab or not, even within an educational institution. - Nuns/Brothers/Priests: In the Christian tradition, many families groom their children to be nuns or priests from a young age. Is there free will there? Isn't it brainwashing, in that case? Have ever asked, why a father and mother who got married and had children, are forcing their children to be nuns/priests? In short, YOU RESPECT CUSTOMS OF CERTAIN RELIGIONS, BUT NOT HINDUISM? 2) Do you have children? Are your children practicing law? Are they lawyers or HC judges? - If yes, why did you force your profession on them? - If not, why did you allow them not to be in the legal field? I hope you got my point. Do you realize that there is something called free will? 3) What was the need to drag Sadhguru's daughter into this discussion? If Sadhguru's daughter had chosen to be a "hermitess," would you ask: "Why is Sadhguru forcing his will on his daughter?" 4) Do you have any evidence that Sadhguru forces anyone to be a "hermit" or "hermitess?" If not, why make such a loose remark? 5) In Hinduism, what path one chooses is entirely up to the individual! And no, there is no coercion, unlike some other faiths. We have many spiritual paths, unlike foreign faiths. If you don't know what the Yogic path is all about, you must first learn about it before making irresponsible remarks like this one. 6) This case has been going on for almost a decade. This man approaches the police again and again, even though his daughters have made it clear to the court, in the past that they are staying at the Isha Foundation of their own free will. 7) You imply that Sadhguru is against marriage. Do you know that you can get married at Isha Yoga Center? Lastly, don't you have millions of cases pending all around the country? And then you spend your time making such inane, irresponsible comments? As a tax-paying citizen of Bharat, I expect you to be more responsible with your observations in the future! Regards, A Concerned Hindu

Anand #IndianfromSouth

388,645 次观看 • 2 年前

A Constitutional Attorney SPEAKS OUT Against What The United States Government Has Become, TYRANNICAL. Calls Out Big Pharma MUST LISTEN: “We Have The Right To Resist — When in the world do we start testing things on children?” “We The People is how the Constitution starts. A magistrate is a person that operates under authority and they are lesser magistrates. The founding fathers of this country understood that there is going to come a point in time where the federal government will need to be checked. If not, they will become tyrants. ‌ And that is what's happening now. So, the Declaration of Independence says that everyone, by virtue of being a human being, has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The federal government too, the federal government purpose is to protect the rights of those citizens, the rights of us to our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. The third point of that document is if they fail to protect its citizens and enforce those rights, the citizens have a right to revolt. Do you understand? We have a right to resist and we have an obligation and a duty to do so. ‌ Do you understand? ‌ Yeah! ‌ THEY ARE COMING FOR OUR CHILDREN, We cannot sit down! Nope. ‌ Everybody knows even the bad ones know that if you want to affect a country, you go for its children. ‌ When in the world do we start using children as bulletproof vests for us? ‌ When in the world do we start testing things on children? Legal shield. ‌ You have started a war! ‌ Each one reach one and teach one. Do you understand? As a magistrate in this country, the United States government, our government, our local leaders have to answer to us. The ninth amendment says that any rights that are not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved for the people. I don't want to hear that mandates are not enumerated in the Constitution because for the stuff that is not enumerated means to equal protection is the right to protect my body. When you want to, when you want to push something into my body against my consent, without my consent, it is rape. And this is medical rape. No!”

Wall Street Apes

228,883 次观看 • 3 年前

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Hopewell Chin’ono

68,177 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨✈️ EXCLUSIVE TESTIMONY FROM A PASSENGER ON VUELING FLIGHT VY8166 🇪🇸 50 French Jewish teenagers, aged 15, were expelled from a Vueling Airlines flight… because one of them simply said the word “Limot” (meaning “the days” in Hebrew), attempting (unsuccessfully) to start a summer camp song. There was no chanting, no shouting, no disruption. I collected the testimony of Damien, a neutral passenger who was on board with his daughter. His account directly contradicts the false and defamatory statement released by Vueling Airlines, which claimed to have acted in the name of passenger safety, even though that safety was never under threat. The children are described as polite and calm. I also received testimony from the family of the camp’s director, a 21-year-old woman who was violently thrown to the ground (see video), handcuffed, and then taken alone into a room with a police officer. The officer told her, in Spanish ( a language she understands ) that she would be banned from the country for two years, and proceeded to ask her a question about Israel ⁉️ This, despite the fact that she is a young French citizen supervising French Jewish children on a trip. Discreet and respectful, she simply stepped in, peacefully, when police demanded that the children delete the videos they had recorded on board. Yet in Spain, demanding the deletion of videos in such a context is illegal. It constitutes an obstruction of evidence and an unjustified pressure on foreign minors, outside any legal framework. These testimonies reveal a chilling truth. What happened here had nothing to do with safety. It was antisemitism at work. And even if the children had been slightly noisy (which they were not), it would never have justified such a violent expulsion. People tolerate football fans chanting, bachelor party shouting, and planes full of drunk festival-goers. But here, Jewish children were expelled for a single word in Hebrew. Vueling Airlines’s crew committed a serious wrong by targeting our children. There will be consequences ⚖️ Cc StopAntisemitism American Jewish Committee כאן Canary Mission The Jerusalem Post

SwordOfSalomon

407,514 次观看 • 1 年前