正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Blanche: The DOJ is completely committed to enforcing… the voting rights laws that every single American should want. And that's what we're doing, and the way that California has done it in our view does not work. And so we're going to fight it and we expect that we'll... show more

Acyn

693,444 subscribers

82,504 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Q: Pope Leo made some comments about the war in Iran, and the conference of catholic bishops recently put out a statement suggesting that the war does not fit the requirements of just war theory. Hegseth: Pope's going to do his thing. That's fine. We know what our mission is. We know what authority we have. We're very clear about that. We follow that the orders of the president. We've got lawyers all over the place looking at what we're doing and why we're doing it, and giving us every authority necessary under our laws to execute it. So we feel very confident across the spectrum about what we're doing.

Q: Pope Leo made some comments about the war in Iran, and the conference of catholic bishops recently put out a statement suggesting that the war does not fit the requirements of just war theory. Hegseth: Pope's going to do his thing. That's fine. We know what our mission is. We know what authority we have. We're very clear about that. We follow that the orders of the president. We've got lawyers all over the place looking at what we're doing and why we're doing it, and giving us every authority necessary under our laws to execute it. So we feel very confident across the spectrum about what we're doing.

Acyn

38,709 次观看 • 4 个月前

We can all read the manifesto ourselves and, and it says that we'll deliver day one rights and that includes unfair dismissal. We're no longer doing it, so we're doing something completely inconsistent what was in the manifesto. Speaking to Jane Hill News on BBC Radio 4.

We can all read the manifesto ourselves and, and it says that we'll deliver day one rights and that includes unfair dismissal. We're no longer doing it, so we're doing something completely inconsistent what was in the manifesto. Speaking to Jane Hill News on BBC Radio 4.

Andy McDonald MP for Middlesbrough & Thornaby East

20,342 次观看 • 9 个月前

Garcia: In our initial estimation—It could be that we're only getting about 10% of what the DOJ has. And of that 10%, 5% of that has already been released. And the other 5% is highly redacted. So we're getting very little so far

Garcia: In our initial estimation—It could be that we're only getting about 10% of what the DOJ has. And of that 10%, 5% of that has already been released. And the other 5% is highly redacted. So we're getting very little so far

Acyn

177,778 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elon Musk: 𝕏 is simply trying to adhere to the law. If the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. "What we're trying to do is simply adhere to the laws in a country. If something is illegal in the United States, or if it's illegal in Europe or Brazil or wherever it might be, then we will take it down, and we'll suspend the account because we're not there to make the laws. But if speech is not illegal, then what are we doing? Now we're injecting ourselves in as a censor. And where does it stop? And who decides? Where does that path lead? I think it leads to a bad place. So, if the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. But otherwise, we're going to obey the law in each jurisdiction. That's it. It's not more complicated than that. We're not trying to flout the law. We're trying to adhere to the law. And if the laws change, we will change. And if the laws don't change, we won't. We're just literally trying to adhere to the law." From: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024

Elon Musk: 𝕏 is simply trying to adhere to the law. If the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. "What we're trying to do is simply adhere to the laws in a country. If something is illegal in the United States, or if it's illegal in Europe or Brazil or wherever it might be, then we will take it down, and we'll suspend the account because we're not there to make the laws. But if speech is not illegal, then what are we doing? Now we're injecting ourselves in as a censor. And where does it stop? And who decides? Where does that path lead? I think it leads to a bad place. So, if the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. But otherwise, we're going to obey the law in each jurisdiction. That's it. It's not more complicated than that. We're not trying to flout the law. We're trying to adhere to the law. And if the laws change, we will change. And if the laws don't change, we won't. We're just literally trying to adhere to the law." From: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024

ELON CLIPS

5,539,295 次观看 • 1 年前

Carney on the end of the old world order: "That is our view. And we regret it, but we're not going to sit around and mourn it... We're acting in a way, both that's in our interest, but we believe, in a way with others, that's building imperfectly in steps a new system."

Carney on the end of the old world order: "That is our view. And we regret it, but we're not going to sit around and mourn it... We're acting in a way, both that's in our interest, but we believe, in a way with others, that's building imperfectly in steps a new system."

Scott Robertson

135,094 次观看 • 7 个月前

Kamala Harris: We cannot despair. We cannot despair. The nature of a democracy is such that I think there's a duality. On the one hand, there's an incredible strength when our democracy is intact. An incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people. Oh, there's great strength in that. And it is very fragile. It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it. And so that's the moment we're in. And I say do not despair because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it, in our democracy the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be. And so let's not feel powerless. Because then we have been defeated. And that's not our character as the American people. We are not one to be defeated. We rise to a moment and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country. And in many ways let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it. The baton is now in our hands, to fight for, not against, but for this country we love.

Kamala Harris: We cannot despair. We cannot despair. The nature of a democracy is such that I think there's a duality. On the one hand, there's an incredible strength when our democracy is intact. An incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people. Oh, there's great strength in that. And it is very fragile. It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it. And so that's the moment we're in. And I say do not despair because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it, in our democracy the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be. And so let's not feel powerless. Because then we have been defeated. And that's not our character as the American people. We are not one to be defeated. We rise to a moment and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country. And in many ways let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it. The baton is now in our hands, to fight for, not against, but for this country we love.

Acyn

343,187 次观看 • 1 年前

Blanche: it's absolutely false to suggest that this DOJ is not executing as we should in doing the right thing every single day. Whitehouse: I will tell you that you are wrong, that in the history of the department, this kind of criticism by federal judges is unprecedented. And it comes from judges of every different political persuasion.

Blanche: it's absolutely false to suggest that this DOJ is not executing as we should in doing the right thing every single day. Whitehouse: I will tell you that you are wrong, that in the history of the department, this kind of criticism by federal judges is unprecedented. And it comes from judges of every different political persuasion.

Acyn

53,478 次观看 • 1 个月前

Kamala Harris: I honestly don't believe that it will be anytime soon that we are going to revive the voting rights act. So, I don't believe it is going to be the best use of our energy right now to try to get that done because I don't know that it will get done right now the way this congress is composed and the way they have been treating civil rights issues.

Kamala Harris: I honestly don't believe that it will be anytime soon that we are going to revive the voting rights act. So, I don't believe it is going to be the best use of our energy right now to try to get that done because I don't know that it will get done right now the way this congress is composed and the way they have been treating civil rights issues.

Acyn

2,929,728 次观看 • 25 天前

"It's hard to win a big-league game. It always has been. Right now, it hasn't gone our way. If we had a magical way to win every single game, we would definitely be doing it. I think that at the end of the day, everybody in here has enough talent to get a win tomorrow and that's how we're going to approach tomorrow." - Marcus Semien

"It's hard to win a big-league game. It always has been. Right now, it hasn't gone our way. If we had a magical way to win every single game, we would definitely be doing it. I think that at the end of the day, everybody in here has enough talent to get a win tomorrow and that's how we're going to approach tomorrow." - Marcus Semien

SNY

17,796 次观看 • 4 个月前

Chamath says Silicon Valley lost what made it great and only cares about money now "Silicon Valley has completely lost what made it great. It was a place for weirdos, for people at the fringes, for people that really were idealistic. And it has become something that's far from that now. It is the equivalent of what Harvard used to be. It's a credentialing place." "When we came, we used to aspire to meet the Bill Campbells of the world, Mike Moritz, John Doerr. Those folks are gone. We used to aspire to work for Steve Jobs. He's not here." "And in that breach, all we have done is focused on making money in every single way that we can, hand over fist. And there's nothing wrong with that. Except now it’s at a point where we need to do a better job of acknowledging it and trying to do a little bit better.” “Every time we don't, and we're given a chance to be better, and we're not, the hatred builds, the animus builds. And that's what we're seeing now."

Chamath says Silicon Valley lost what made it great and only cares about money now "Silicon Valley has completely lost what made it great. It was a place for weirdos, for people at the fringes, for people that really were idealistic. And it has become something that's far from that now. It is the equivalent of what Harvard used to be. It's a credentialing place." "When we came, we used to aspire to meet the Bill Campbells of the world, Mike Moritz, John Doerr. Those folks are gone. We used to aspire to work for Steve Jobs. He's not here." "And in that breach, all we have done is focused on making money in every single way that we can, hand over fist. And there's nothing wrong with that. Except now it’s at a point where we need to do a better job of acknowledging it and trying to do a little bit better.” “Every time we don't, and we're given a chance to be better, and we're not, the hatred builds, the animus builds. And that's what we're seeing now."

dnap

3,784,136 次观看 • 4 天前

Rogin: We give them the weapons, we're funding this war, we should be able to have the more than a 50% say in whether American blood and treasure is spent to perpetuate this war for months and months. Who's going to win that disagreement? Is it going to be Trump and we're going to end the war soon? Or is it going to be Bibi? And the war is going to go on for a very long time. In the end, we’re going to find out who wears the pants in this bromance.

Rogin: We give them the weapons, we're funding this war, we should be able to have the more than a 50% say in whether American blood and treasure is spent to perpetuate this war for months and months. Who's going to win that disagreement? Is it going to be Trump and we're going to end the war soon? Or is it going to be Bibi? And the war is going to go on for a very long time. In the end, we’re going to find out who wears the pants in this bromance.

Acyn

33,709 次观看 • 5 个月前

Rogin: This is the most unpopular war in American history by far, and for good reason. And the way that these things work is that the longer that it goes on, the popularity goes down, not up over time. And that is a calamity for the Republican party. But that's not what's important right now. What's important is that it's a calamity for the United States of America, for our national security, for our alliances abroad, for putting our troops in danger with no clear strategy of what achieves a victory and how to get them out of there. And how does this end? And without any of those answers, everybody can see that the administration is flailing about. And the way we know they have no strategy because the strategy changes every single day with various justifications that don't make any sense when compared to one another. And that's where we are. And that's a pretty sad state of affairs. And yes, that's going to be terrible for Republicans in November, but that's really not the most worst thing about it. And Donald Trump doesn't seem to care about that anyway.

Rogin: This is the most unpopular war in American history by far, and for good reason. And the way that these things work is that the longer that it goes on, the popularity goes down, not up over time. And that is a calamity for the Republican party. But that's not what's important right now. What's important is that it's a calamity for the United States of America, for our national security, for our alliances abroad, for putting our troops in danger with no clear strategy of what achieves a victory and how to get them out of there. And how does this end? And without any of those answers, everybody can see that the administration is flailing about. And the way we know they have no strategy because the strategy changes every single day with various justifications that don't make any sense when compared to one another. And that's where we are. And that's a pretty sad state of affairs. And yes, that's going to be terrible for Republicans in November, but that's really not the most worst thing about it. And Donald Trump doesn't seem to care about that anyway.

Acyn

49,764 次观看 • 3 个月前

Blanche on Swalwell referral: The difference between this DOJ and the DOJ of the past four years is we're investigating and enforcing the law in a fair way. Lawfare is gone. It’s not part of this DOJ.

Blanche on Swalwell referral: The difference between this DOJ and the DOJ of the past four years is we're investigating and enforcing the law in a fair way. Lawfare is gone. It’s not part of this DOJ.

Acyn

210,750 次观看 • 9 个月前

Hegseth: We'll negotiate with bombs. Our job is to ensure that we compel Iran to realize that this new regime, this regime in charge, is in a better place if they make that deal. And so we'll continue. We're working hand in hand, but the primary effort is a deal. We want that deal to be accomplished, if at all possible. If not, then we're prepared to continue.

Hegseth: We'll negotiate with bombs. Our job is to ensure that we compel Iran to realize that this new regime, this regime in charge, is in a better place if they make that deal. And so we'll continue. We're working hand in hand, but the primary effort is a deal. We want that deal to be accomplished, if at all possible. If not, then we're prepared to continue.

Acyn

78,625 次观看 • 4 个月前

Trudeau: We’re probably going to keep booing the American anthem. But let me tell Americans, we're not booing you. We're not booing your teams. We're not booing your players. We're booing a policy that is designed to hurt us. And we're insulted. And we're angry. But we're Canadian. Which means we're going to stand up for each other. We're going to fight. And we're going to win.

Trudeau: We’re probably going to keep booing the American anthem. But let me tell Americans, we're not booing you. We're not booing your teams. We're not booing your players. We're booing a policy that is designed to hurt us. And we're insulted. And we're angry. But we're Canadian. Which means we're going to stand up for each other. We're going to fight. And we're going to win.

Acyn

3,937,701 次观看 • 1 年前

We're not gonna drain the Great Salt Lake. That's ridiculous. We are gonna create incremental jobs. This is not gonna destroy air quality because we don't have the option to do that. That's controlled both state and federally, and we don't want to do that. That's not what we wanna do. I want this to be the example of what we can do all across the country. This is not going to be my only project. But in order to do that, we have to prove it, and we're not building 40,000 acres of data centers. That's the size of the land parcel. So saying it’s twice the size of Manhattan is ridiculous. We're building very slowly and incrementally, and everybody around us nationally and internationally can see what we're doing. It'll be totally transparent, and we want it to be the shining example of how you do this.

We're not gonna drain the Great Salt Lake. That's ridiculous. We are gonna create incremental jobs. This is not gonna destroy air quality because we don't have the option to do that. That's controlled both state and federally, and we don't want to do that. That's not what we wanna do. I want this to be the example of what we can do all across the country. This is not going to be my only project. But in order to do that, we have to prove it, and we're not building 40,000 acres of data centers. That's the size of the land parcel. So saying it’s twice the size of Manhattan is ridiculous. We're building very slowly and incrementally, and everybody around us nationally and internationally can see what we're doing. It'll be totally transparent, and we want it to be the shining example of how you do this.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

149,781 次观看 • 3 个月前

Watters: The president reportedly frustrated that the cases against Tish and Schiff and Brennan and Comey aren't going anywhere. Are you the guy that's going to be able to get that done? Blanche: I appreciate the frustration because we do have to make sure that what happened for four years never happens again, and we don't talk about investigations but I can tell you that the DOJ is working hard every day. Watters: You get the anger. I mean what Biden and Obama did to this president, you understand there's a lot of anger about that? Blanche: Not only do I understand, I lived it.

Watters: The president reportedly frustrated that the cases against Tish and Schiff and Brennan and Comey aren't going anywhere. Are you the guy that's going to be able to get that done? Blanche: I appreciate the frustration because we do have to make sure that what happened for four years never happens again, and we don't talk about investigations but I can tell you that the DOJ is working hard every day. Watters: You get the anger. I mean what Biden and Obama did to this president, you understand there's a lot of anger about that? Blanche: Not only do I understand, I lived it.

Acyn

491,799 次观看 • 4 个月前