正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

"Blender MCP" vs. "Generative 3D" – The Showdown ⚔️ Side-by-side comparison of two generated buildings: ⬅️ The 1st one (left) was created using Blender MCP (powered by Claude 3.7). ➡️ The 2nd one (right) was generated with a generative 3D model (direct 2D-to-3D). Check out the differences below 👇

265,520 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Emm | scenario.com 的头像
Emm | scenario.com1 年前

1 - Material Preview (in Blender) ⬅️ Reference Image to the left

Emm | scenario.com 的头像
Emm | scenario.com1 年前

Material Preview (with objects)

Emm | scenario.com 的头像
Emm | scenario.com1 年前

2 - Solid

Emm | scenario.com 的头像
Emm | scenario.com1 年前

3 - Wireframe ((low-poly vs. Generative 3D)

Emm | scenario.com 的头像
Emm | scenario.com1 年前

4 - Rendered

Emm | scenario.com 的头像
Emm | scenario.com1 年前

Close-up comparison of the wireframes (low-poly vs. Generative 3D)

Emm | scenario.com 的头像
Emm | scenario.com1 年前

2 versions of the "Blender MCP" building. - Left = model originally generated - Right = optimized (detail + style enhancement)

Rainmaker 的头像
Rainmaker2 年前

Which Machine Learning model delivers stronger trading results? Check out this free Substack post where I compare several powerful models that beat the market and show yearly returns of over 20%.

Supreme 的头像
Supreme1 年前

looks like you have way more control over the individual pieces with Blender MCP, making it easier to manipulate in post!

Emm | scenario.com 的头像
Emm | scenario.com1 年前

Direct to 3D took 1-2 minutes Blender MCP took me hours 🫣😱, but it was one of my first tests, so next ones will certainly take less. And it's way more manipulable indeed.

Game Genie - AI, Art & Games 的头像
Game Genie - AI, Art & Games1 年前

Is a hybrid approach possible? where maybe i start with Gen AI and use blender MCP to perform minor changes?

相关视频