Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

“Bob Cousy couldn’t dribble with his left hand” - JJ Redick Meanwhile Cousy was hitting lefty hook shots and has a BETTER highlight real than JJ does 😂 Put some respect on past legends’ names!! ✌🏻 (stonersportsnetwork IG)

172,434 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Prince Harry Couldn’t Even Explain Invictus Like JJ Could Joe Marler asked one of the simplest questions imaginable: “Can you explain for those who don’t know what the Invictus Games are?” If there was ever a moment for the founder to explain the mission, this was it. After all, this is the project he has built much of his public identity around. He repeatedly refers to himself as its founder and has spent years promoting it around the world. Instead, his first response was, “You do this one.” JJ Chalmers then gave the explanation I expected from Harry. He didn’t talk about press coverage, global recognition or how much the Games have grown. He explained the purpose. Invictus was created to use sport as a tool for the recovery and rehabilitation of wounded, injured and sick service personnel. But, as JJ explained so powerfully, it became so much more than that. It gave veterans purpose after devastating injuries. It rebuilt confidence. It gave them a community that understood their struggles. It reminded them they were more than the worst day of their lives. As JJ himself said, “It totally changed my life.” That is the heart of Invictus. Harry, meanwhile, summed it up by saying it started with sport as part of recovery and rehabilitation, that it had become much bigger than anyone imagined, that it reaches beyond the military community, and that it “really means something to people.” That isn’t an explanation. It’s a summary. As the founder, I expected Harry to articulate the mission before anyone else. Explain what Invictus is. Who it’s for. Why it exists. What it aims to achieve. Then invite JJ to show what that mission meant to him personally. Instead, the competitor explained the purpose while the founder focused on the growth. Personally, it feels like Harry has lost sight of what made Invictus extraordinary in the first place.

Queen Esther

87,988 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This is how a CEO loses credibility with me. Cofounder of NuroAI A is making an AI that can drive vehicles, was winning me over through demonstrations of his more flexible AI than Tesla has demonstrated. Drove in left-hand Japan with no prior training on such. Learned by decomposing the road into all of its parts. So figured out that you needed to drive in the left instantly. But then he said LiDAR is demonstrating itself to be safer. So I stuck up my hand and asked for a situation where LiDAR and camera is safer than camera only approaches, which his company sells too. “A child all in black at night, particularly around a corner.” So tonight after I drove my friend home at 2:30 a.m. I studied this in deep detail in my wife’s Model Y with hardware 4 and Tesla Self Driving controlling the car. 1. Cameras can see far more than humans can at night. 2. Modern cars come with matrix headlights. Which go around the turn and illuminate anywhere a car can turn. 3. Every intersection has a light on almost every intersection. Where there is none why would a child in black be playing on the street in the dark. 4. Tesla has a “zoomed in” telephoto camera as one of the cameras under the windshield so it can actually see ahead far better than a human can. Plus the other night this car drove around a clump of dirt and rocks on the road at 50 mph. I didn’t even see it until the car had already quickly turned around it. I give you his speech here. But you gotta come up with better examples of why a car company needs to spend “low thousands” (his quote, not mine) per car more on LiDARs than that.

Robert Scoble

30,594 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce