Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

‼️BOMBSHELL: Blake Neff CONFIRMS Andrew Flew Into Provo From Phoenix- PROOF Andrew Kolvet Had FOREKNOWLEDGE Of Charlie Kirk's Impending Doom?😱 Blake Neff (longtime producer on The Charlie Kirk Show and one of TPUSA’s most vocal defenders of the official narrative) slipped in LouisianaGirl (Tara)’s late-night impromptu Spaces and said...

ProjectConstitu's profile picture

Project Constitution

293,615 subscribers

197,641 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Was there a plot to kill Charlie Kirk that Andrew Kolvet knew about? Candace believes that Andrew flew into Scottsdale not Provo from Santa Barbara. Andrew Kolvet was already on the tarmac and his plane took off just 5 minutes after Charlie Kirk was shot. Additional TPUSA members, including Erika Kirk, may have met at the Scottsdale airport before flying together to Provo. This is not what Erika and TPUSA told the public.
10:28

Was there a plot to kill Charlie Kirk that Andrew Kolvet knew about? Candace believes that Andrew flew into Scottsdale not Provo from Santa Barbara. Andrew Kolvet was already on the tarmac and his plane took off just 5 minutes after Charlie Kirk was shot. Additional TPUSA members, including Erika Kirk, may have met at the Scottsdale airport before flying together to Provo. This is not what Erika and TPUSA told the public.

Morgan Ariel

73,007 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 TPUSA CAUGHT LYING: Leaked Texts DESTROY Kolvet’s “Tarmac Hug” Story – Was on Charlie’s Plane the Whole Time?! 💥 The official narrative of what happened on the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated just completely collapsed. Tonight, Candace Owens took to her podcast and released the most explosive evidence to date: the leaked, internal group chat between Turning Point USA executives from September 10th. These messages directly contradict the official story told by TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet regarding his whereabouts, his flights, and the now-infamous "Tarmac Hug" with Erika Kirk. Here is the exact timeline Candace just exposed, and why it proves the syndicate is lying. 📉🕵️‍♂️ Andrew Kolvet, the chief spokesperson for TPUSA, told Candace a very specific story about the day Charlie died. He claimed that he was in Santa Barbara with his wife when the shooting occurred. He claimed he booked a private plane and flew to Provo, Utah three hours later (departing at PM). According to his story, he flew to Provo, stepped off the plane, and immediately "collapsed" into a "boo-hoo crying" hug with Charlie's wife, Erika Kirk, on the tarmac. Candace immediately suspected this was a lie. Why would Erika Kirk wait on a tarmac for over an hour for the PR guy to land instead of rushing to the hospital to see her husband? PART 2: THE LEAKED RECEIPTS (THE TRUTH) Candace just dropped the internal TPUSA communications group chat from that exact day. The chat includes Andrew Kolvet, Justin Streiff (the new COO), and Marina Minas (CMO). The timestamps on these messages completely destroy Kolvet's timeline. PM (Utah Time): Charlie Kirk is shot. PM: Kolvet messages the group, stating they can publicly confirm Charlie has been shot. PM: The team asks Kolvet a crucial PR question about putting someone on Fox News. Kolvet goes completely silent. For nearly two hours, the chief spokesperson for the organization is unreachable during the biggest crisis in their history. PM: Kolvet finally replies. His excuse? "Sorry on the plane, this just loaded." If Kolvet's official story was true, he would have been sitting in Santa Barbara from PM to PM waiting for his flight. He would have had full internet and cell service. Instead, his own text message admits he was "on the plane" and his messages "just loaded" (meaning he was in the air without Wi-Fi) during that exact window. PART 3: WHO WAS REALLY ON THE PLANE? Candace matched Kolvet's "blackout" window ( PM - PM) with the actual flight logs from that day. PM: Charlie Kirk's personal plane leaves Scottsdale, AZ. PM: Charlie Kirk's plane lands in Provo, UT. Andrew Kolvet didn't fly out of Santa Barbara hours later with his wife. The text timestamps suggest Kolvet was already on a plane during that window—highly likely Charlie Kirk's own plane. This means the dramatic story he told Candace about flying in later and having a spontaneous, emotional "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk was a fabricated narrative. PART 4: THE COVER-UP & THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE Because Kolvet was secretly in the air and unreachable, the burden of writing the official corporate death statement for Charlie Kirk fell to Aubrey, a 26-year-old junior employee. Marina Minas (CMO) forced this young staffer to draft the most emotionally traumatizing public statement in the organization's history because the senior PR executive was inexplicably off the grid. (Adding insult to injury, Candace notes that TPUSA leadership later fired Aubrey over a conversation with an Uber driver). THE BOTTOM LINE The Turning Point executives have been caught in a massive, verifiable lie about their movements and communications on the day their founder was assassinated. Why did Andrew Kolvet lie about what plane he was on? Why did he lie about when he flew? And why did he fabricate the story of the "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk? They are hiding something massive about the timeline of September 10th. And Candace Owens just brought the receipts. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her FULL podcast below. 👇
22:59

🚨 TPUSA CAUGHT LYING: Leaked Texts DESTROY Kolvet’s “Tarmac Hug” Story – Was on Charlie’s Plane the Whole Time?! 💥 The official narrative of what happened on the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated just completely collapsed. Tonight, Candace Owens took to her podcast and released the most explosive evidence to date: the leaked, internal group chat between Turning Point USA executives from September 10th. These messages directly contradict the official story told by TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet regarding his whereabouts, his flights, and the now-infamous "Tarmac Hug" with Erika Kirk. Here is the exact timeline Candace just exposed, and why it proves the syndicate is lying. 📉🕵️‍♂️ Andrew Kolvet, the chief spokesperson for TPUSA, told Candace a very specific story about the day Charlie died. He claimed that he was in Santa Barbara with his wife when the shooting occurred. He claimed he booked a private plane and flew to Provo, Utah three hours later (departing at PM). According to his story, he flew to Provo, stepped off the plane, and immediately "collapsed" into a "boo-hoo crying" hug with Charlie's wife, Erika Kirk, on the tarmac. Candace immediately suspected this was a lie. Why would Erika Kirk wait on a tarmac for over an hour for the PR guy to land instead of rushing to the hospital to see her husband? PART 2: THE LEAKED RECEIPTS (THE TRUTH) Candace just dropped the internal TPUSA communications group chat from that exact day. The chat includes Andrew Kolvet, Justin Streiff (the new COO), and Marina Minas (CMO). The timestamps on these messages completely destroy Kolvet's timeline. PM (Utah Time): Charlie Kirk is shot. PM: Kolvet messages the group, stating they can publicly confirm Charlie has been shot. PM: The team asks Kolvet a crucial PR question about putting someone on Fox News. Kolvet goes completely silent. For nearly two hours, the chief spokesperson for the organization is unreachable during the biggest crisis in their history. PM: Kolvet finally replies. His excuse? "Sorry on the plane, this just loaded." If Kolvet's official story was true, he would have been sitting in Santa Barbara from PM to PM waiting for his flight. He would have had full internet and cell service. Instead, his own text message admits he was "on the plane" and his messages "just loaded" (meaning he was in the air without Wi-Fi) during that exact window. PART 3: WHO WAS REALLY ON THE PLANE? Candace matched Kolvet's "blackout" window ( PM - PM) with the actual flight logs from that day. PM: Charlie Kirk's personal plane leaves Scottsdale, AZ. PM: Charlie Kirk's plane lands in Provo, UT. Andrew Kolvet didn't fly out of Santa Barbara hours later with his wife. The text timestamps suggest Kolvet was already on a plane during that window—highly likely Charlie Kirk's own plane. This means the dramatic story he told Candace about flying in later and having a spontaneous, emotional "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk was a fabricated narrative. PART 4: THE COVER-UP & THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE Because Kolvet was secretly in the air and unreachable, the burden of writing the official corporate death statement for Charlie Kirk fell to Aubrey, a 26-year-old junior employee. Marina Minas (CMO) forced this young staffer to draft the most emotionally traumatizing public statement in the organization's history because the senior PR executive was inexplicably off the grid. (Adding insult to injury, Candace notes that TPUSA leadership later fired Aubrey over a conversation with an Uber driver). THE BOTTOM LINE The Turning Point executives have been caught in a massive, verifiable lie about their movements and communications on the day their founder was assassinated. Why did Andrew Kolvet lie about what plane he was on? Why did he lie about when he flew? And why did he fabricate the story of the "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk? They are hiding something massive about the timeline of September 10th. And Candace Owens just brought the receipts. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her FULL podcast below. 👇

Project Constitution

30,531 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

‼️Candace Owens Says Blake Neff and Andrew Kolvet Are Crashing Out As Their Narrative Falls Apart 👀 Candace Owens teased major updates on the mysterious burnt object seen in the backseat of the SUV that took Charlie Kirk to the hospital. She said new information from the public has them “onto something” regarding what that object actually was. She also called out Blake Neff for making a bizarre admission on X Spaces, where he claimed he blacked out on the morning of September 10th and doesn’t remember where he went or who he was with. Candace said his explanation was “frankly bizarre.” On top of that, she noted that Andrew Kolvet is finally admitting Charlie Kirk’s true feelings about Benjamin Netanyahu — something many have been pointing out for months. Candace suggested that the sudden wave of strange confessions and erratic behavior from certain people is happening because the public is no longer buying the official story, and the cracks in the narrative are becoming impossible to ignore. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇
0:48

‼️Candace Owens Says Blake Neff and Andrew Kolvet Are Crashing Out As Their Narrative Falls Apart 👀 Candace Owens teased major updates on the mysterious burnt object seen in the backseat of the SUV that took Charlie Kirk to the hospital. She said new information from the public has them “onto something” regarding what that object actually was. She also called out Blake Neff for making a bizarre admission on X Spaces, where he claimed he blacked out on the morning of September 10th and doesn’t remember where he went or who he was with. Candace said his explanation was “frankly bizarre.” On top of that, she noted that Andrew Kolvet is finally admitting Charlie Kirk’s true feelings about Benjamin Netanyahu — something many have been pointing out for months. Candace suggested that the sudden wave of strange confessions and erratic behavior from certain people is happening because the public is no longer buying the official story, and the cracks in the narrative are becoming impossible to ignore. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

42,163 Aufrufe • vor 20 Stunden

Andrew Kolvet explains to Dave Rubin that the "abhorrent, diabolical, and unprecedented" attacks on Erika Kirk are "demons shrieking in terror for realizing they had screwed up." Just about every person of good faith who appreciated Charlie Kirk felt for Erika, and was rooting for her and TPUSA in the immediate aftermath of the assassination. Some fringe bad actors did not. However, in media appearance after media appearance Erika Kirk and others at TPUSA, including Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, Mikey McCoy, and others lied about details that happened leading up to, the day of, and after Charlie being killed. This has caused people to doubt, question, and lose trust in those individuals and the organization at large. Yes, Charlie's death did shine a light on something abhorrent and diabolical. Andrew Kolvet himself contributed to it, and Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Tucker Carlson have been slandered and threatened for daring to bring it up... that is the treatment that Charlie Kirk was receiving from his Zionist donors. They pulled their money, told him that God was going to smite him, called him an antisemite, and labeled him an extremist. The "demons" that I see shrieking are those who were making Charlie's life a living hell in it's last months. Dave Rubin was one of them. What's even worse, and something I cannot understand, is why Erika and those at TPUSA have just continued on with these people. No cutting donors who harrassed him, no firing those who failed to protect him, just Zionist business as usual... They are now even using Charlie to push certain agendas he fought against while he was alive. They claim to be carrying on his legacy, but many see them as trying to hijack or rewrite it. They then turn around and say anyone questioning this or "attacking" Erika for doing so is evil.
2:20

Andrew Kolvet explains to Dave Rubin that the "abhorrent, diabolical, and unprecedented" attacks on Erika Kirk are "demons shrieking in terror for realizing they had screwed up." Just about every person of good faith who appreciated Charlie Kirk felt for Erika, and was rooting for her and TPUSA in the immediate aftermath of the assassination. Some fringe bad actors did not. However, in media appearance after media appearance Erika Kirk and others at TPUSA, including Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, Mikey McCoy, and others lied about details that happened leading up to, the day of, and after Charlie being killed. This has caused people to doubt, question, and lose trust in those individuals and the organization at large. Yes, Charlie's death did shine a light on something abhorrent and diabolical. Andrew Kolvet himself contributed to it, and Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Tucker Carlson have been slandered and threatened for daring to bring it up... that is the treatment that Charlie Kirk was receiving from his Zionist donors. They pulled their money, told him that God was going to smite him, called him an antisemite, and labeled him an extremist. The "demons" that I see shrieking are those who were making Charlie's life a living hell in it's last months. Dave Rubin was one of them. What's even worse, and something I cannot understand, is why Erika and those at TPUSA have just continued on with these people. No cutting donors who harrassed him, no firing those who failed to protect him, just Zionist business as usual... They are now even using Charlie to push certain agendas he fought against while he was alive. They claim to be carrying on his legacy, but many see them as trying to hijack or rewrite it. They then turn around and say anyone questioning this or "attacking" Erika for doing so is evil.

Zach Costello

34,396 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Andrew Kolvet’s timeline doesn’t appear to match. In this video, Andrew says he filmed and hosted The Charlie Kirk Show live from the Yrefy studio in Arizona on September 10—the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated. But elsewhere, Andrew has said he was at his home in Santa Barbara when he learned Charlie had been shot and then flew directly to Provo. Those are two different accounts. So which is it, Andrew? I’m sharing the clip so everyone can hear his own words and decide for themselves. If there’s an explanation that reconciles these statements, it should be addressed. 🎥 Watch the video below and judge for yourself. Candace Owens Zach Costello Em mystic🐈‍⬛️gypsy Muppet Masher Matthew St Baker Matt Tucciarone Faith Driver
0:42

🚨 BREAKING: Andrew Kolvet’s timeline doesn’t appear to match. In this video, Andrew says he filmed and hosted The Charlie Kirk Show live from the Yrefy studio in Arizona on September 10—the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated. But elsewhere, Andrew has said he was at his home in Santa Barbara when he learned Charlie had been shot and then flew directly to Provo. Those are two different accounts. So which is it, Andrew? I’m sharing the clip so everyone can hear his own words and decide for themselves. If there’s an explanation that reconciles these statements, it should be addressed. 🎥 Watch the video below and judge for yourself. Candace Owens Zach Costello Em mystic🐈‍⬛️gypsy Muppet Masher Matthew St Baker Matt Tucciarone Faith Driver

The Black Line Brief

36,220 Aufrufe • vor 13 Stunden

🚨 Erika Kirk's ALIBI Is Destroyed —Baron Coleman PROVES Erika Was Likely In Provo BEFORE The Shot.😱 Baron Coleman just released the most damning timeline yet. Using contemporaneous flight logs, transponder data, and deleted police dispatch audio, he has reconstructed the real movements of September 10th. The Conclusion: Erika Kirk didn't fly in to hold her dying husband. She was likely on the ground in Provo two hours before he was shot. Here is the step-by-step breakdown of the "Shell Game" they played with the planes to hide her location. 1. THE "GHOST FLIGHT" (10:06 AM) The Evidence: Flight N560TW (a private charter) left Scottsdale, AZ, and landed in Provo at 10:06 AM. The Theory: Baron believes Erika Kirk was on this flight. The Connection: At 10:05 AM—exactly one minute before this plane landed—the transponder of the mysterious Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) turned on at the Provo airport. The Implication: If Erika was on this flight, she was in Provo 2.5 hours BEFORE the "Big Bang" (which happened at 12:23 PM). 2. THE "REPOSITIONING" SHELL GAME After dropping its passenger (Erika?) in Provo, that same plane (N560TW) immediately took off for Santa Barbara. Why? To pick up Andrew Kolvet. It then flew Andrew from Santa Barbara to Scottsdale, arriving around 1:40 PM. The Switch: Meanwhile, the Kirk family plane (Delta Zulu) flew empty from Salt Lake City to Scottsdale to meet Andrew. The Decoy: Andrew likely boarded the Delta Zulu flight in Scottsdale to fly back to Provo, making it look like the plane was bringing Erika. 3. THE "FALLING INTO ARMS" LIE Official Story: Andrew Kolvet claimed that when he landed in Provo, he "fell into Erika's arms" on the tarmac. The Problem: The flight Andrew supposedly took (Regency) didn't land until 4:36 PM. The flight Erika supposedly took (Delta Zulu) landed at 3:12 PM. The Contradiction: Are we supposed to believe Erika landed and then sat around the airport for 90 minutes while her husband was dying at the hospital?. The Real Story: If Baron is right, Erika had been at the airport since 10:06 AM. When Andrew arrived on the decoy flight at 3:12 PM, she was there to meet him and stage the scene. 4. THE DELETED POLICE AUDIO ("SIGNATURE" VS. "DUNCAN") Baron played a saved dispatch recording that has since been scrubbed from the internet. The Audio: Police/Fire dispatchers are coordinating Erika's arrival. Officer 1 (Jesse): "Charlie's wife is coming to Signature" (The main FBO for rich travelers). Officer 2 (Corey): "No, no, no. They're landing at Duncan" (A remote terminal on the far north side). Why the confusion? If she was flying in on the family jet, she would go to Signature. The confusion suggests she was already on the ground, possibly hiding at the remote Duncan terminal, and the team couldn't keep their story straight. 5. THE EGYPTIAN JET CONNECTION Baron points out that the Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) transponder turned on three separate times that day—and each time was within 5 minutes of an Erika/Andrew flight taking off or landing. The Photo: A photo taken between 11:00-11:30 AM shows the Egyptian jet sitting on the tarmac with its ladder down and windows closed. Baron's Theory: Erika may have been sitting on that plane (a communications hub) while waiting for the event to unfold. THE VERDICT The timeline destroys the alibi. If Erika Kirk was in Provo at 10:06 AM, she lied to the police, she lied to the public, and she placed herself at the scene of the crime. "If you say you weren't at the scene of the crime, but you turned out you were... you look guilty." Be sure to FOLLOW Baron Coleman and go watch his FULL Episode, linked down below👇
39:38

🚨 Erika Kirk's ALIBI Is Destroyed —Baron Coleman PROVES Erika Was Likely In Provo BEFORE The Shot.😱 Baron Coleman just released the most damning timeline yet. Using contemporaneous flight logs, transponder data, and deleted police dispatch audio, he has reconstructed the real movements of September 10th. The Conclusion: Erika Kirk didn't fly in to hold her dying husband. She was likely on the ground in Provo two hours before he was shot. Here is the step-by-step breakdown of the "Shell Game" they played with the planes to hide her location. 1. THE "GHOST FLIGHT" (10:06 AM) The Evidence: Flight N560TW (a private charter) left Scottsdale, AZ, and landed in Provo at 10:06 AM. The Theory: Baron believes Erika Kirk was on this flight. The Connection: At 10:05 AM—exactly one minute before this plane landed—the transponder of the mysterious Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) turned on at the Provo airport. The Implication: If Erika was on this flight, she was in Provo 2.5 hours BEFORE the "Big Bang" (which happened at 12:23 PM). 2. THE "REPOSITIONING" SHELL GAME After dropping its passenger (Erika?) in Provo, that same plane (N560TW) immediately took off for Santa Barbara. Why? To pick up Andrew Kolvet. It then flew Andrew from Santa Barbara to Scottsdale, arriving around 1:40 PM. The Switch: Meanwhile, the Kirk family plane (Delta Zulu) flew empty from Salt Lake City to Scottsdale to meet Andrew. The Decoy: Andrew likely boarded the Delta Zulu flight in Scottsdale to fly back to Provo, making it look like the plane was bringing Erika. 3. THE "FALLING INTO ARMS" LIE Official Story: Andrew Kolvet claimed that when he landed in Provo, he "fell into Erika's arms" on the tarmac. The Problem: The flight Andrew supposedly took (Regency) didn't land until 4:36 PM. The flight Erika supposedly took (Delta Zulu) landed at 3:12 PM. The Contradiction: Are we supposed to believe Erika landed and then sat around the airport for 90 minutes while her husband was dying at the hospital?. The Real Story: If Baron is right, Erika had been at the airport since 10:06 AM. When Andrew arrived on the decoy flight at 3:12 PM, she was there to meet him and stage the scene. 4. THE DELETED POLICE AUDIO ("SIGNATURE" VS. "DUNCAN") Baron played a saved dispatch recording that has since been scrubbed from the internet. The Audio: Police/Fire dispatchers are coordinating Erika's arrival. Officer 1 (Jesse): "Charlie's wife is coming to Signature" (The main FBO for rich travelers). Officer 2 (Corey): "No, no, no. They're landing at Duncan" (A remote terminal on the far north side). Why the confusion? If she was flying in on the family jet, she would go to Signature. The confusion suggests she was already on the ground, possibly hiding at the remote Duncan terminal, and the team couldn't keep their story straight. 5. THE EGYPTIAN JET CONNECTION Baron points out that the Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) transponder turned on three separate times that day—and each time was within 5 minutes of an Erika/Andrew flight taking off or landing. The Photo: A photo taken between 11:00-11:30 AM shows the Egyptian jet sitting on the tarmac with its ladder down and windows closed. Baron's Theory: Erika may have been sitting on that plane (a communications hub) while waiting for the event to unfold. THE VERDICT The timeline destroys the alibi. If Erika Kirk was in Provo at 10:06 AM, she lied to the police, she lied to the public, and she placed herself at the scene of the crime. "If you say you weren't at the scene of the crime, but you turned out you were... you look guilty." Be sure to FOLLOW Baron Coleman and go watch his FULL Episode, linked down below👇

Project Constitution

194,526 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

OH MY GOD… 🚨 Candace Owens reveals the persons who texted Charlie Kirk saying “They’re going to kill me” the night before he died was allegedly Andrew Kolvet and Dan Flood “I got that directly from Andrew Kolvet. He asked me to keep it off record. I would have kept it off record if Erika didn’t imply I lied. We have a scenario now where either Andrew Kolvet lied or Erika lied…” 🔻 CONTEXT: On September 9, 2025, Charlie Kirk reportedly joined a Zoom call to discuss his text message the night before and prepare for anti-Israel challenges on his college tour. The call included Rabbi Pesach Wolicki, advisor and Israel365 News associate, Josh Hammer, Newsweek editor and commentator, and a few unnamed Turning Point USA producers. They discussed Kirk’s pro-Israel stance amid tensions with donors and conservative critics. This was believed to have been said during this Zoom meeting. Andrew Kolvet please chime in… is this true? Clip Jimmy Dore Full Show
4:03

OH MY GOD… 🚨 Candace Owens reveals the persons who texted Charlie Kirk saying “They’re going to kill me” the night before he died was allegedly Andrew Kolvet and Dan Flood “I got that directly from Andrew Kolvet. He asked me to keep it off record. I would have kept it off record if Erika didn’t imply I lied. We have a scenario now where either Andrew Kolvet lied or Erika lied…” 🔻 CONTEXT: On September 9, 2025, Charlie Kirk reportedly joined a Zoom call to discuss his text message the night before and prepare for anti-Israel challenges on his college tour. The call included Rabbi Pesach Wolicki, advisor and Israel365 News associate, Josh Hammer, Newsweek editor and commentator, and a few unnamed Turning Point USA producers. They discussed Kirk’s pro-Israel stance amid tensions with donors and conservative critics. This was believed to have been said during this Zoom meeting. Andrew Kolvet please chime in… is this true? Clip Jimmy Dore Full Show

MJTruthUltra

2,830,765 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

‼️UNEARTHED: The 2014 "SCRUBBED" Interview of Kaitlin Kolvet, Wife Of TPUSA PR Guy Andrew Kolvet 👀 As we dig deeper into the power structures surrounding the late Charlie Kirk, we have to look at the people behind the TPUSA machine and the familes that connect them, we’ve recovered a rare, archived 2014 interview—one that has largely been scrubbed from the active web—giving us a window into the woman behind the man who controls the TPUSA narrative: Kaitlin Kolvet. Just months after her marriage to Andrew Kolvet (the gatekeeper for TPUSA and the Kirk family), Kaitlin sat down to discuss her business, La Fete Weddings, in Santa Barbara. While it reads like a lifestyle piece, for those of us investigating the Kirk empire, it’s a blueprint for how this inner circle operates. 1. The Master of High-Stakes Production In the interview, Kaitlin reveals her background as a high-end wedding planner for the Santa Barbara elite. She wasn't just "organizing events"—she was managing million-dollar productions where "perfection" wasn't an option, it was a requirement. This is the exact skill set that was later injected into Turning Point USA. The transition from "student activist group" to "global media juggernaut" with rock-star lighting, pyrotechnics, and flawless staging mirrors Kaitlin’s professional training. The "image" of the conservative movement was built by someone who spent years making sure not a single petal was out of place. 2. The Kolvet Wedding: The First "Grand Production" Kaitlin discusses her own wedding to Andrew Kolvet, describing it as a "classic, elegant" Santa Barbara affair. This was the moment the "Kolvet Brand" was born. For the investigation, this matters because it establishes the timeline of the Andrew-Kaitlin power dynamic. They weren't just a couple; they were a professional unit specialized in reputation management and high-level optics. When Andrew became Charlie Kirk’s primary spokesperson, he had a professional "Image Architect" at his side. 3. Why Was This Interview Scrubbed? The fact that this interview was deleted from the live web is a red flag. As we’ve noted in our investigation, the Kolvets have been meticulous about their digital footprint. Is it because it shows a level of California "elitism" that clashes with the grassroots "populist" brand TPUSA promotes? Or does it highlight a professional history in curating narratives that makes their current roles as "truth-seekers" look more like "brand managers"? 📩 HAVE MORE INFO? If you have more archived data or inside knowledge on the Kolvet/Kirk dynamic, DM or email: projectconstitutionvideos@gmail.com
3:49

‼️UNEARTHED: The 2014 "SCRUBBED" Interview of Kaitlin Kolvet, Wife Of TPUSA PR Guy Andrew Kolvet 👀 As we dig deeper into the power structures surrounding the late Charlie Kirk, we have to look at the people behind the TPUSA machine and the familes that connect them, we’ve recovered a rare, archived 2014 interview—one that has largely been scrubbed from the active web—giving us a window into the woman behind the man who controls the TPUSA narrative: Kaitlin Kolvet. Just months after her marriage to Andrew Kolvet (the gatekeeper for TPUSA and the Kirk family), Kaitlin sat down to discuss her business, La Fete Weddings, in Santa Barbara. While it reads like a lifestyle piece, for those of us investigating the Kirk empire, it’s a blueprint for how this inner circle operates. 1. The Master of High-Stakes Production In the interview, Kaitlin reveals her background as a high-end wedding planner for the Santa Barbara elite. She wasn't just "organizing events"—she was managing million-dollar productions where "perfection" wasn't an option, it was a requirement. This is the exact skill set that was later injected into Turning Point USA. The transition from "student activist group" to "global media juggernaut" with rock-star lighting, pyrotechnics, and flawless staging mirrors Kaitlin’s professional training. The "image" of the conservative movement was built by someone who spent years making sure not a single petal was out of place. 2. The Kolvet Wedding: The First "Grand Production" Kaitlin discusses her own wedding to Andrew Kolvet, describing it as a "classic, elegant" Santa Barbara affair. This was the moment the "Kolvet Brand" was born. For the investigation, this matters because it establishes the timeline of the Andrew-Kaitlin power dynamic. They weren't just a couple; they were a professional unit specialized in reputation management and high-level optics. When Andrew became Charlie Kirk’s primary spokesperson, he had a professional "Image Architect" at his side. 3. Why Was This Interview Scrubbed? The fact that this interview was deleted from the live web is a red flag. As we’ve noted in our investigation, the Kolvets have been meticulous about their digital footprint. Is it because it shows a level of California "elitism" that clashes with the grassroots "populist" brand TPUSA promotes? Or does it highlight a professional history in curating narratives that makes their current roles as "truth-seekers" look more like "brand managers"? 📩 HAVE MORE INFO? If you have more archived data or inside knowledge on the Kolvet/Kirk dynamic, DM or email: [email protected]

Project Constitution

142,112 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

So now Candace is saying Miriam Adelson had something to do with Butler, PA shooting because Charlie Kirk and Andrew Kolvet told her that the money was given in exchange for annexing the West Bank. And Trump took it and said I’m going to F her over. I don’t believe for a second Charlie Kirk told her this in July of 2024. Also don’t believe she asked for that or that Trump would publicly tell people right after he would F her over. I stopped asking why Candace does what she does. If Charlie Kirk was alive none of these demonic cowards would have said any of these things. Begs the question who really benefited from that tragedy. That’s how this works right? So far the person who has benefited the most financially is Candace Owens. And it’s not even close.
2:57

So now Candace is saying Miriam Adelson had something to do with Butler, PA shooting because Charlie Kirk and Andrew Kolvet told her that the money was given in exchange for annexing the West Bank. And Trump took it and said I’m going to F her over. I don’t believe for a second Charlie Kirk told her this in July of 2024. Also don’t believe she asked for that or that Trump would publicly tell people right after he would F her over. I stopped asking why Candace does what she does. If Charlie Kirk was alive none of these demonic cowards would have said any of these things. Begs the question who really benefited from that tragedy. That’s how this works right? So far the person who has benefited the most financially is Candace Owens. And it’s not even close.

Insurrection Barbie

47,850 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

BULLET REMOVED before autopsy and people at Charlie Kirk event said they don't believe official story. NO ONE inline waiting for Charlie Kirk event on Sunday said they believed the official narrative of the assassination. Andrew Kolvet, from TPUSA, has stated that Charlie Kirk's surgeon removed the bullet from Charlie, after he was already confirmed deceased. There is no clear indication or answer as to why the bullet was removed before an autopsy was ever conducted. I don't even no what to say anymore. I hope we get some answers soon. One thing to take into consideration is that there is still an ongoing investigation and they do have information crucial to the case that they WILL NOT release yet, and there probably is a good reason for it as well. Until everything is released we can not make a final conclusion. The truth is all we want.
0:52

BULLET REMOVED before autopsy and people at Charlie Kirk event said they don't believe official story. NO ONE inline waiting for Charlie Kirk event on Sunday said they believed the official narrative of the assassination. Andrew Kolvet, from TPUSA, has stated that Charlie Kirk's surgeon removed the bullet from Charlie, after he was already confirmed deceased. There is no clear indication or answer as to why the bullet was removed before an autopsy was ever conducted. I don't even no what to say anymore. I hope we get some answers soon. One thing to take into consideration is that there is still an ongoing investigation and they do have information crucial to the case that they WILL NOT release yet, and there probably is a good reason for it as well. Until everything is released we can not make a final conclusion. The truth is all we want.

The SCIF

830,355 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 EXPOSED: How Frank Turek Just ACCIDENTALLY Exposed The Sept 10th Cover-Up—Erika Had To Have Allegedly Traveled On An EARLIER Flight To Utah 😱 Candace Owens just broke down a massive new piece of the puzzle regarding the timeline of September 10th, and it completely shatters the official story about the infamous "tarmac hug" between Andrew Kolvet and Erika Kirk. If you thought the timeline was messy before, wait until you see this math. THE FRANK TUREK TIMELINE Frank Turek (a former Navy officer and one of the only people who hasn't been caught lying in this entire saga) gave an interview detailing the events at the hospital. Because he is a military man, he is incredibly precise with time. He stated on the record that Erika Kirk arrived at the hospital around 4:00 PM. THE LOGISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY Here is why that completely destroys the official narrative: TPUSA and Erika claim that she met Andrew Kolvet on the runway when his plane landed from Santa Barbara. The problem? That plane didn't land in Provo until 4:40 PM. * It is a 20-minute drive from the airport to the hospital with zero traffic. By the time you factor in deplaning, the emotional tarmac hug, moving to the cars, and driving to the hospital in the middle of an active manhunt with SWAT teams everywhere, the absolute earliest they could have arrived at the hospital is 5:15 PM. If Erika met Andrew's plane at 4:40 PM, she could not have been at the hospital at 4:00 PM. The math is impossible. THE ONLY WAY IT WORKS Candace believes both Frank Turek AND Andrew Kolvet are telling the truth. She believes the tarmac hug really happened, and she believes they arrived at the hospital at 4:00 PM. There is only one way both of those things can be true: Erika Kirk had to have flown into Utah on an entirely different, earlier flight. And the only plane that fits that timeline? Charlie Kirk's plane, which landed at 3:31 PM. That would give them exactly enough time to have the tarmac hug, deplane, get a police escort, and arrive at the hospital by 4:00 PM, exactly as Frank Turek stated. THE BOTTOM LINE Every time we find a discrepancy between Andrew Kolvet's story and Erika Kirk's story, it turns out Erika is the one lying. She threw Andrew under the bus regarding the 30-06 caliber text, and she is throwing him under the bus now. Erika was not on that 4:40 PM flight. The official story is a fabrication. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL podcast below. 👇
7:21

🚨 EXPOSED: How Frank Turek Just ACCIDENTALLY Exposed The Sept 10th Cover-Up—Erika Had To Have Allegedly Traveled On An EARLIER Flight To Utah 😱 Candace Owens just broke down a massive new piece of the puzzle regarding the timeline of September 10th, and it completely shatters the official story about the infamous "tarmac hug" between Andrew Kolvet and Erika Kirk. If you thought the timeline was messy before, wait until you see this math. THE FRANK TUREK TIMELINE Frank Turek (a former Navy officer and one of the only people who hasn't been caught lying in this entire saga) gave an interview detailing the events at the hospital. Because he is a military man, he is incredibly precise with time. He stated on the record that Erika Kirk arrived at the hospital around 4:00 PM. THE LOGISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY Here is why that completely destroys the official narrative: TPUSA and Erika claim that she met Andrew Kolvet on the runway when his plane landed from Santa Barbara. The problem? That plane didn't land in Provo until 4:40 PM. * It is a 20-minute drive from the airport to the hospital with zero traffic. By the time you factor in deplaning, the emotional tarmac hug, moving to the cars, and driving to the hospital in the middle of an active manhunt with SWAT teams everywhere, the absolute earliest they could have arrived at the hospital is 5:15 PM. If Erika met Andrew's plane at 4:40 PM, she could not have been at the hospital at 4:00 PM. The math is impossible. THE ONLY WAY IT WORKS Candace believes both Frank Turek AND Andrew Kolvet are telling the truth. She believes the tarmac hug really happened, and she believes they arrived at the hospital at 4:00 PM. There is only one way both of those things can be true: Erika Kirk had to have flown into Utah on an entirely different, earlier flight. And the only plane that fits that timeline? Charlie Kirk's plane, which landed at 3:31 PM. That would give them exactly enough time to have the tarmac hug, deplane, get a police escort, and arrive at the hospital by 4:00 PM, exactly as Frank Turek stated. THE BOTTOM LINE Every time we find a discrepancy between Andrew Kolvet's story and Erika Kirk's story, it turns out Erika is the one lying. She threw Andrew under the bus regarding the 30-06 caliber text, and she is throwing him under the bus now. Erika was not on that 4:40 PM flight. The official story is a fabrication. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL podcast below. 👇

Project Constitution

29,209 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Candace Owens said that Andrew Kolvet told her that the night before Charlie Kirk died, Kolvet received a text from Charlie that said, "They're going to kill me." And according to Candace, Erika Kirk—who's now in possession of Charlie's cell phone—confirmed that Kolvet did receive a message the night before and Charlie's security guard Dan Flood received a message that said, "The Left is going to kill me." It's extremely important to understand who Charlie meant when he said "they." Some people might have assumed that he was referring to their preconceived villain. But if he was talking about the Left, why is this being overlooked? Why isn't Candace focusing her investigative power on the Left? There were online posts in the days and weeks leading up to Charlie assassination that signaled foreknowledge of the assassination. These posts suggest it's very possible that there were people who knew that violence was going to be committed against Charlie Kirk. These are not normal posts These are not posts that should be overlooked. What the radical, transgender militia-like group "Armed Queers Salt Lake City," who suddenly scrubbed their entire online presence immediately after Charlie Kirk's assassination? What about Robinson's transgender furry boyfriend, Lance Twiggs? Why is there such little interest in learning more about Twiggs's influence, knowledge, or possible involvement in Charlie's assassination?
4:47

Candace Owens said that Andrew Kolvet told her that the night before Charlie Kirk died, Kolvet received a text from Charlie that said, "They're going to kill me." And according to Candace, Erika Kirk—who's now in possession of Charlie's cell phone—confirmed that Kolvet did receive a message the night before and Charlie's security guard Dan Flood received a message that said, "The Left is going to kill me." It's extremely important to understand who Charlie meant when he said "they." Some people might have assumed that he was referring to their preconceived villain. But if he was talking about the Left, why is this being overlooked? Why isn't Candace focusing her investigative power on the Left? There were online posts in the days and weeks leading up to Charlie assassination that signaled foreknowledge of the assassination. These posts suggest it's very possible that there were people who knew that violence was going to be committed against Charlie Kirk. These are not normal posts These are not posts that should be overlooked. What the radical, transgender militia-like group "Armed Queers Salt Lake City," who suddenly scrubbed their entire online presence immediately after Charlie Kirk's assassination? What about Robinson's transgender furry boyfriend, Lance Twiggs? Why is there such little interest in learning more about Twiggs's influence, knowledge, or possible involvement in Charlie's assassination?

Liz Wheeler

117,173 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Charlie Kirk Show Blasts Megyn Kelly: “Wound Collecting” Leftist Tactic Exposed! “Crazies will hurl an accusation... this stuff is like it will drive fringy people skitso people crazy... it will drive them to violence." ~ Andrew Kolvet This week, "The Charlie Kirk Show" with Blake Neff and Andrew Kolvet responded to remarks made by Megyn Kelly during her interview with Shawn Ryan earlier that week. Neff struggled to pinpoint the right description for the rhetoric he was hearing, saying, “I’m fishing for the right word to use, but it feels like… it feels like wound collecting if you’ve ever heard of that.” Kolvet immediately agreed, adding, “That sounds like a leftist tactic.” Neff replied, “Exactly.”The discussion centered on Kelly’s comments in the Shawn Ryan interview, where she declared of certain conspiracy-laden views, “It’s core MAGA now.” When Ryan responded with confusion with “I have no idea," the exchange turned to claims that “Trump has said from the beginning pedophile supporting Israeli lobby.” Kelly followed up, “Well, I mean I have no idea,” before suggesting, “Need a different acronym.” Kolvet warned that such tactics are dangerously irresponsible. “Crazies will hurl an accusation and then if you address it then it’s like oh you defended yourself too much if you don’t address it well why are you silent on this topic,” he explained. “There is no right answer when it comes to pedophilia accusations they tried to accuse Erica of being like connected to Epstein this this stuff is like it will drive fringy people skitso people crazy people it will drive them to violence and so I don’t like seeing a conversation between two people that should be responsible in this way just echoing and parroting the pedophilia stuff and the Israel.”
0:54

Charlie Kirk Show Blasts Megyn Kelly: “Wound Collecting” Leftist Tactic Exposed! “Crazies will hurl an accusation... this stuff is like it will drive fringy people skitso people crazy... it will drive them to violence." ~ Andrew Kolvet This week, "The Charlie Kirk Show" with Blake Neff and Andrew Kolvet responded to remarks made by Megyn Kelly during her interview with Shawn Ryan earlier that week. Neff struggled to pinpoint the right description for the rhetoric he was hearing, saying, “I’m fishing for the right word to use, but it feels like… it feels like wound collecting if you’ve ever heard of that.” Kolvet immediately agreed, adding, “That sounds like a leftist tactic.” Neff replied, “Exactly.”The discussion centered on Kelly’s comments in the Shawn Ryan interview, where she declared of certain conspiracy-laden views, “It’s core MAGA now.” When Ryan responded with confusion with “I have no idea," the exchange turned to claims that “Trump has said from the beginning pedophile supporting Israeli lobby.” Kelly followed up, “Well, I mean I have no idea,” before suggesting, “Need a different acronym.” Kolvet warned that such tactics are dangerously irresponsible. “Crazies will hurl an accusation and then if you address it then it’s like oh you defended yourself too much if you don’t address it well why are you silent on this topic,” he explained. “There is no right answer when it comes to pedophilia accusations they tried to accuse Erica of being like connected to Epstein this this stuff is like it will drive fringy people skitso people crazy people it will drive them to violence and so I don’t like seeing a conversation between two people that should be responsible in this way just echoing and parroting the pedophilia stuff and the Israel.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

29,784 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 JUST IN: The threats against Erika Kirk are SO BAD that it was the FIRST time TPUSA EVER had to cancel that kind of appearance in the organization's history Evil monsters. "[Erika's] children are one parent away from being orphaned." Security: "We can't guarantee your safety. We recommend you don't do this." "I think it's the first time we've ever had to make that decision in TP history. Everything that happened with Charlie...we're still grieving that." "The security team telling us...was a really chilling moment for all of us to internalize and experience." Andrew Kolvet Erika Kirk
1:33

🚨 JUST IN: The threats against Erika Kirk are SO BAD that it was the FIRST time TPUSA EVER had to cancel that kind of appearance in the organization's history Evil monsters. "[Erika's] children are one parent away from being orphaned." Security: "We can't guarantee your safety. We recommend you don't do this." "I think it's the first time we've ever had to make that decision in TP history. Everything that happened with Charlie...we're still grieving that." "The security team telling us...was a really chilling moment for all of us to internalize and experience." Andrew Kolvet Erika Kirk

Eric Daugherty

119,883 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk CAUGHT Lying —Candace Owens Drops PROOF Charlie Kirk KNEW They Were Coming For Him 24 Hours Before Assassination! 🧾 Coach Colin just dropped a must-watch breakdown of Candace Owens absolutely DESTROYING Erika Kirk's lies on the Jimmy Dore show yesterday. Remember Erika Kirk's Fox News interview where she flat-out claimed Charlie NEVER sent any such texts where Charlie said "They are going to kill me", that they "never existed," and she knew because she had his phone. She basically called Candace a liar. Well, guess what? That's the FIRST provable LIE from Erika herself. Immediate backlash hit her hard—and now Candace Owens has cornered them with undeniable receipts. Candace finally revealed what she's been holding back: Andrew Kolvet (that's right, TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet) told her DIRECTLY that Charlie Kirk texted him JUST 24 HOURS before his public execution: "They're going to kill me tomorrow." This is ON TOP of the receipts I already dropped—from Frank Turek and Harrison H. Smith ✞, both confirming Charlie sent them similar desperate messages in the days leading up to his assassination, begging for prayers because he KNEW they were coming for him. Why the cover-up? Why deny what multiple people received? Is she lying or did someone delete those messages from Charlie's phone before it made it back to Erika? If the latter that would be pretty incriminating, proving someone was trying to cover their tracks. And why is TPUSA acting like everything's fine instead of demanding REAL answers about who really took out Charlie? The deep state narrative is crumbling. A "lone shooter"? Please. Charlie KNEW something big—and they silenced him fast. Go FOLLOW Coach Colin and watch his FULL Video (link in the comments below) and wake up. The truth is coming out, and we won't let them bury it with Charlie. Tag someone who needs to see this. Those of us that can't be bought are demanding justice.🇺🇸
12:37

🚨BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk CAUGHT Lying —Candace Owens Drops PROOF Charlie Kirk KNEW They Were Coming For Him 24 Hours Before Assassination! 🧾 Coach Colin just dropped a must-watch breakdown of Candace Owens absolutely DESTROYING Erika Kirk's lies on the Jimmy Dore show yesterday. Remember Erika Kirk's Fox News interview where she flat-out claimed Charlie NEVER sent any such texts where Charlie said "They are going to kill me", that they "never existed," and she knew because she had his phone. She basically called Candace a liar. Well, guess what? That's the FIRST provable LIE from Erika herself. Immediate backlash hit her hard—and now Candace Owens has cornered them with undeniable receipts. Candace finally revealed what she's been holding back: Andrew Kolvet (that's right, TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet) told her DIRECTLY that Charlie Kirk texted him JUST 24 HOURS before his public execution: "They're going to kill me tomorrow." This is ON TOP of the receipts I already dropped—from Frank Turek and Harrison H. Smith ✞, both confirming Charlie sent them similar desperate messages in the days leading up to his assassination, begging for prayers because he KNEW they were coming for him. Why the cover-up? Why deny what multiple people received? Is she lying or did someone delete those messages from Charlie's phone before it made it back to Erika? If the latter that would be pretty incriminating, proving someone was trying to cover their tracks. And why is TPUSA acting like everything's fine instead of demanding REAL answers about who really took out Charlie? The deep state narrative is crumbling. A "lone shooter"? Please. Charlie KNEW something big—and they silenced him fast. Go FOLLOW Coach Colin and watch his FULL Video (link in the comments below) and wake up. The truth is coming out, and we won't let them bury it with Charlie. Tag someone who needs to see this. Those of us that can't be bought are demanding justice.🇺🇸

Project Constitution

19,485 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨Was Joe Kent Candace Owens’ mole in the US government, feeding her information about the Charlie Kirk investigation? On October 1, 2025, Candace Owens said she was “very aware of what’s going on” and claimed that “about 48 hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie Kirk informed people at Turning Point, Jewish donors, as well as a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause.” She was directly quoting a message Charlie Kirk had sent in a group chat before his death - a message Candace revealed on her show a week later. TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet revealed the next day, on October 8, that he was in the group chat and had taken that screenshot, and that, “to leave no stone unturned,” he had passed it on to “people in government” for the sake of the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s death, saying, “I don’t know where it went from there, apparently.” Pointing to the fact that it landed in Candace Owens' lap. The New York Times reported on October 28 that Joe Kent, while still serving as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, had: “examined FBI files in the last several weeks to investigate whether the man charged with assassinating Charlie Kirk had support from someone else, a foreign power, or another entity, according to multiple people with knowledge of the matter.” Which, according to the Times article: “alarmed Kash Patel, the director of the FBI. Mr. Patel and other senior officials believed Mr. Kent was overstepping, treading on FBI responsibilities, and potentially interfering with the investigation and the prosecution of the suspect, Tyler Robinson.” After resigning from his role as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show today. Speaking about the Charlie Kirk investigation, he said, “there’s still linkage for us to investigate,” and pointed directly to the group chat text messages that Andrew Kolvet had handed over to the US government - and that Candace Owens had used on her show - as evidence of that. It was also reported today that Joe Kent is under investigation by the FBI for allegedly leaking classified information while serving as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center. Considering that Candace Owens had access to a private message tied to the Charlie Kirk investigation - a message that was passed to government officials - and that Joe Kent was, at the same time, reviewing sensitive case material, is now reportedly under investigation for leaks, and has himself pointed to that same message as evidence of a broader conspiracy, The overlap is enough to raise a legitimate question about whether he could have been Candace Owens' source. I reached out to Joe Kent for comment, but he did not respond.
2:01

🚨Was Joe Kent Candace Owens’ mole in the US government, feeding her information about the Charlie Kirk investigation? On October 1, 2025, Candace Owens said she was “very aware of what’s going on” and claimed that “about 48 hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie Kirk informed people at Turning Point, Jewish donors, as well as a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause.” She was directly quoting a message Charlie Kirk had sent in a group chat before his death - a message Candace revealed on her show a week later. TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet revealed the next day, on October 8, that he was in the group chat and had taken that screenshot, and that, “to leave no stone unturned,” he had passed it on to “people in government” for the sake of the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s death, saying, “I don’t know where it went from there, apparently.” Pointing to the fact that it landed in Candace Owens' lap. The New York Times reported on October 28 that Joe Kent, while still serving as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, had: “examined FBI files in the last several weeks to investigate whether the man charged with assassinating Charlie Kirk had support from someone else, a foreign power, or another entity, according to multiple people with knowledge of the matter.” Which, according to the Times article: “alarmed Kash Patel, the director of the FBI. Mr. Patel and other senior officials believed Mr. Kent was overstepping, treading on FBI responsibilities, and potentially interfering with the investigation and the prosecution of the suspect, Tyler Robinson.” After resigning from his role as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show today. Speaking about the Charlie Kirk investigation, he said, “there’s still linkage for us to investigate,” and pointed directly to the group chat text messages that Andrew Kolvet had handed over to the US government - and that Candace Owens had used on her show - as evidence of that. It was also reported today that Joe Kent is under investigation by the FBI for allegedly leaking classified information while serving as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center. Considering that Candace Owens had access to a private message tied to the Charlie Kirk investigation - a message that was passed to government officials - and that Joe Kent was, at the same time, reviewing sensitive case material, is now reportedly under investigation for leaks, and has himself pointed to that same message as evidence of a broader conspiracy, The overlap is enough to raise a legitimate question about whether he could have been Candace Owens' source. I reached out to Joe Kent for comment, but he did not respond.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

453,170 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Candace Owens is a HYPOCRITE & a LIAR. Today Candace kept going on about this miraculous tip today, how "it was God operating" that it came to her - It was mostly rambling irrelevant information then claims that Charlie Kirk's security worked with the US military to kill Kirk - per usual no evidence provided. In September after Andrew Kolvet posted about the "absolute miracle" that Kirk was shot in the neck and did not exit his body, likely preventing additional casualties - something unusual but by no means impossible. Candace mocked this statement saying it was "the manipulation of a Christian audience." She also continues to just lie about previous claims. When Blake Neff quoted Candace Owens saying Charlie Kirk's murder "had to be approved by his friends." She just lied saying "I never said that. In the context he put it in." She did say that and in the full context it looks just as an outrageous claim.
3:33

Candace Owens is a HYPOCRITE & a LIAR. Today Candace kept going on about this miraculous tip today, how "it was God operating" that it came to her - It was mostly rambling irrelevant information then claims that Charlie Kirk's security worked with the US military to kill Kirk - per usual no evidence provided. In September after Andrew Kolvet posted about the "absolute miracle" that Kirk was shot in the neck and did not exit his body, likely preventing additional casualties - something unusual but by no means impossible. Candace mocked this statement saying it was "the manipulation of a Christian audience." She also continues to just lie about previous claims. When Blake Neff quoted Candace Owens saying Charlie Kirk's murder "had to be approved by his friends." She just lied saying "I never said that. In the context he put it in." She did say that and in the full context it looks just as an outrageous claim.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

43,324 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Texas State TPUSA Chapter Member Just RESIGNED & Dropped a SCATHING Resignation Letter CRITICIZING Erika Kirk and Other TPUSA Executives 👀 Mason Lemme (Mason Lemme) officially disassociated from Turning Point USA on April 10th — exactly 7 months after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. In his letter, he exposes the massive manipulation of the Christian faith to push the “lone shooter miracle” narrative, suppress questions about the .30-06 rifle footage, and backtrack on Charlie’s original stances. He calls out the “deeply disturbing” leaked Zoom calls, the shift to “TPUSA 2.0,” and how leadership is weaponizing Jesus to shut down anyone asking for the truth. Direct quote from the letter:“I truly believe that there has been a massive worldwide manipulation of the Christian faith surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk. This strategy was used to weaponize people’s faith in Jesus against themselves in order to make people believe a specific narrative.” TPUSA died with Charlie. The grift continues without him. Drop a 🔥 if you’re done with the fake “conservative” machine. RT to make sure Erika Kirk and the TPUSA elites see exactly what their own chapter members think of them now. FOLLOW Mason Lemme And go watch his FULL video linked below as i left a lot out. 🔽 CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman Erika Kirk Andrew Kolvet Blake Neff Tyler Bowyer Turning Point USA Aubrey Laitsch
30:46

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Texas State TPUSA Chapter Member Just RESIGNED & Dropped a SCATHING Resignation Letter CRITICIZING Erika Kirk and Other TPUSA Executives 👀 Mason Lemme (Mason Lemme) officially disassociated from Turning Point USA on April 10th — exactly 7 months after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. In his letter, he exposes the massive manipulation of the Christian faith to push the “lone shooter miracle” narrative, suppress questions about the .30-06 rifle footage, and backtrack on Charlie’s original stances. He calls out the “deeply disturbing” leaked Zoom calls, the shift to “TPUSA 2.0,” and how leadership is weaponizing Jesus to shut down anyone asking for the truth. Direct quote from the letter:“I truly believe that there has been a massive worldwide manipulation of the Christian faith surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk. This strategy was used to weaponize people’s faith in Jesus against themselves in order to make people believe a specific narrative.” TPUSA died with Charlie. The grift continues without him. Drop a 🔥 if you’re done with the fake “conservative” machine. RT to make sure Erika Kirk and the TPUSA elites see exactly what their own chapter members think of them now. FOLLOW Mason Lemme And go watch his FULL video linked below as i left a lot out. 🔽 CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman Erika Kirk Andrew Kolvet Blake Neff Tyler Bowyer Turning Point USA Aubrey Laitsch

Project Constitution

739,394 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: MYSTERIOUS PRIVATE JET Candace Owens Exposed that flew a WEIRD route on the MORNING Charlie Kirk was ASSASSINATED... Belongs to a MAJOR TPUSA DONOR who might've been FURIOUS over Kirk's shifting views on Israel. Coincidence? Or something SINISTER? Yesterday on her live, Candace dropped THIS bombshell: "There is another flight that I am now very interested in... The tail number is N560TW. It departed on the morning of September 10th from Scottsdale, Arizona, and landed in Provo at 10:06 AM. It then immediately turned around and departed for Santa Barbara... then back to Scottsdale by 12:44 PM. Somebody saw something" This Cessna Citation XLS twin-jet (tail #N560TW) is OWNED by T.W. Lewis Aviation LLC—tied directly to the T.W. Lewis Foundation, a MASSIVE conservative donor that PROUDLY lists Turning Point USA as a key partner on their site. They've funneled millions into "strengthening America" orgs like TPUSA, Heritage Foundation, and more. And get this: Tom Lewis HIMSELF shared the stage with Kirk back in 2023 at ASU's "Health, Wealth & Happiness" event—co-hosted by Lewis's own center. Kirk was a featured speaker, right alongside big names like Dennis Prager and Robert Kiyosaki. But tensions? Reports leaked post-assassination show Kirk lost $2M from a "Jewish donor" after refusing to slam Tucker Carlson—and refusing to stay "pro-Israel" amid his Epstein file rants. Was Lewis—or someone connected—applying pressure? Kirk texted friends: "No choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause." The flight path screams "red flags": Scottsdale → Provo (land 10:06 AM) → Santa Barbara (depart 11:37 AM, maybe grab someone?) → Scottsdale (land 12:44 PM). Ground crew, pilots, witnesses in AZ, UT, or CA—WHO was on that plane? Candace and I are both calling for tips—join the hunt! If you're connected to Scottsdale Airport, Provo, or Santa Barbara that morning, DM or email us. This story is EXPLODING. Who's got the receipts? 👀
1:00

🚨BREAKING: MYSTERIOUS PRIVATE JET Candace Owens Exposed that flew a WEIRD route on the MORNING Charlie Kirk was ASSASSINATED... Belongs to a MAJOR TPUSA DONOR who might've been FURIOUS over Kirk's shifting views on Israel. Coincidence? Or something SINISTER? Yesterday on her live, Candace dropped THIS bombshell: "There is another flight that I am now very interested in... The tail number is N560TW. It departed on the morning of September 10th from Scottsdale, Arizona, and landed in Provo at 10:06 AM. It then immediately turned around and departed for Santa Barbara... then back to Scottsdale by 12:44 PM. Somebody saw something" This Cessna Citation XLS twin-jet (tail #N560TW) is OWNED by T.W. Lewis Aviation LLC—tied directly to the T.W. Lewis Foundation, a MASSIVE conservative donor that PROUDLY lists Turning Point USA as a key partner on their site. They've funneled millions into "strengthening America" orgs like TPUSA, Heritage Foundation, and more. And get this: Tom Lewis HIMSELF shared the stage with Kirk back in 2023 at ASU's "Health, Wealth & Happiness" event—co-hosted by Lewis's own center. Kirk was a featured speaker, right alongside big names like Dennis Prager and Robert Kiyosaki. But tensions? Reports leaked post-assassination show Kirk lost $2M from a "Jewish donor" after refusing to slam Tucker Carlson—and refusing to stay "pro-Israel" amid his Epstein file rants. Was Lewis—or someone connected—applying pressure? Kirk texted friends: "No choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause." The flight path screams "red flags": Scottsdale → Provo (land 10:06 AM) → Santa Barbara (depart 11:37 AM, maybe grab someone?) → Scottsdale (land 12:44 PM). Ground crew, pilots, witnesses in AZ, UT, or CA—WHO was on that plane? Candace and I are both calling for tips—join the hunt! If you're connected to Scottsdale Airport, Provo, or Santa Barbara that morning, DM or email us. This story is EXPLODING. Who's got the receipts? 👀

Project Constitution

1,670,654 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

STRANGE Charlie Kirk update! Both Erika Kirk and Charlie Kirk's Team member Andrew Kolvet released these 2 videos today LESS than an hour apart... BOTH videos show footage from the day Charlie was assassinated that we have NEVER seen before PROVING they have footage that they refuse to show us. Not to mention, Erika Kirks very FIRST sentence in her post seems as if she's trying to explain away her bubbly and energetic attitude right after Charlie was killed including her Fireworks show as she walked out on stage for the memorial and being on multiple pod casts happy as can be... Yes these are tough questions and topics and some of you may not like it... I don't care. I want the truth and were not getting it form the people who were closest to Charlie and that's a serious problem.
1:03

STRANGE Charlie Kirk update! Both Erika Kirk and Charlie Kirk's Team member Andrew Kolvet released these 2 videos today LESS than an hour apart... BOTH videos show footage from the day Charlie was assassinated that we have NEVER seen before PROVING they have footage that they refuse to show us. Not to mention, Erika Kirks very FIRST sentence in her post seems as if she's trying to explain away her bubbly and energetic attitude right after Charlie was killed including her Fireworks show as she walked out on stage for the memorial and being on multiple pod casts happy as can be... Yes these are tough questions and topics and some of you may not like it... I don't care. I want the truth and were not getting it form the people who were closest to Charlie and that's a serious problem.

In2ThinAir

23,679 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten