Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

‼️BOMBSHELL: Blake Neff CONFIRMS Andrew Flew Into Provo From Phoenix- PROOF Andrew Kolvet Had FOREKNOWLEDGE Of Charlie Kirk's Impending Doom?😱 Blake Neff (longtime producer on The Charlie Kirk Show and one of TPUSA’s most vocal defenders of the official narrative) slipped in LouisianaGirl (Tara)’s late-night impromptu Spaces and said...

200,711 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 TPUSA CAUGHT LYING: Leaked Texts DESTROY Kolvet’s “Tarmac Hug” Story – Was on Charlie’s Plane the Whole Time?! 💥 The official narrative of what happened on the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated just completely collapsed. Tonight, Candace Owens took to her podcast and released the most explosive evidence to date: the leaked, internal group chat between Turning Point USA executives from September 10th. These messages directly contradict the official story told by TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet regarding his whereabouts, his flights, and the now-infamous "Tarmac Hug" with Erika Kirk. Here is the exact timeline Candace just exposed, and why it proves the syndicate is lying. 📉🕵️‍♂️ Andrew Kolvet, the chief spokesperson for TPUSA, told Candace a very specific story about the day Charlie died. He claimed that he was in Santa Barbara with his wife when the shooting occurred. He claimed he booked a private plane and flew to Provo, Utah three hours later (departing at PM). According to his story, he flew to Provo, stepped off the plane, and immediately "collapsed" into a "boo-hoo crying" hug with Charlie's wife, Erika Kirk, on the tarmac. Candace immediately suspected this was a lie. Why would Erika Kirk wait on a tarmac for over an hour for the PR guy to land instead of rushing to the hospital to see her husband? PART 2: THE LEAKED RECEIPTS (THE TRUTH) Candace just dropped the internal TPUSA communications group chat from that exact day. The chat includes Andrew Kolvet, Justin Streiff (the new COO), and Marina Minas (CMO). The timestamps on these messages completely destroy Kolvet's timeline. PM (Utah Time): Charlie Kirk is shot. PM: Kolvet messages the group, stating they can publicly confirm Charlie has been shot. PM: The team asks Kolvet a crucial PR question about putting someone on Fox News. Kolvet goes completely silent. For nearly two hours, the chief spokesperson for the organization is unreachable during the biggest crisis in their history. PM: Kolvet finally replies. His excuse? "Sorry on the plane, this just loaded." If Kolvet's official story was true, he would have been sitting in Santa Barbara from PM to PM waiting for his flight. He would have had full internet and cell service. Instead, his own text message admits he was "on the plane" and his messages "just loaded" (meaning he was in the air without Wi-Fi) during that exact window. PART 3: WHO WAS REALLY ON THE PLANE? Candace matched Kolvet's "blackout" window ( PM - PM) with the actual flight logs from that day. PM: Charlie Kirk's personal plane leaves Scottsdale, AZ. PM: Charlie Kirk's plane lands in Provo, UT. Andrew Kolvet didn't fly out of Santa Barbara hours later with his wife. The text timestamps suggest Kolvet was already on a plane during that window—highly likely Charlie Kirk's own plane. This means the dramatic story he told Candace about flying in later and having a spontaneous, emotional "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk was a fabricated narrative. PART 4: THE COVER-UP & THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE Because Kolvet was secretly in the air and unreachable, the burden of writing the official corporate death statement for Charlie Kirk fell to Aubrey, a 26-year-old junior employee. Marina Minas (CMO) forced this young staffer to draft the most emotionally traumatizing public statement in the organization's history because the senior PR executive was inexplicably off the grid. (Adding insult to injury, Candace notes that TPUSA leadership later fired Aubrey over a conversation with an Uber driver). THE BOTTOM LINE The Turning Point executives have been caught in a massive, verifiable lie about their movements and communications on the day their founder was assassinated. Why did Andrew Kolvet lie about what plane he was on? Why did he lie about when he flew? And why did he fabricate the story of the "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk? They are hiding something massive about the timeline of September 10th. And Candace Owens just brought the receipts. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her FULL podcast below. 👇

Project Constitution

30,531 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Andrew Kolvet explains to Dave Rubin that the "abhorrent, diabolical, and unprecedented" attacks on Erika Kirk are "demons shrieking in terror for realizing they had screwed up." Just about every person of good faith who appreciated Charlie Kirk felt for Erika, and was rooting for her and TPUSA in the immediate aftermath of the assassination. Some fringe bad actors did not. However, in media appearance after media appearance Erika Kirk and others at TPUSA, including Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, Mikey McCoy, and others lied about details that happened leading up to, the day of, and after Charlie being killed. This has caused people to doubt, question, and lose trust in those individuals and the organization at large. Yes, Charlie's death did shine a light on something abhorrent and diabolical. Andrew Kolvet himself contributed to it, and Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Tucker Carlson have been slandered and threatened for daring to bring it up... that is the treatment that Charlie Kirk was receiving from his Zionist donors. They pulled their money, told him that God was going to smite him, called him an antisemite, and labeled him an extremist. The "demons" that I see shrieking are those who were making Charlie's life a living hell in it's last months. Dave Rubin was one of them. What's even worse, and something I cannot understand, is why Erika and those at TPUSA have just continued on with these people. No cutting donors who harrassed him, no firing those who failed to protect him, just Zionist business as usual... They are now even using Charlie to push certain agendas he fought against while he was alive. They claim to be carrying on his legacy, but many see them as trying to hijack or rewrite it. They then turn around and say anyone questioning this or "attacking" Erika for doing so is evil.

Zach Costello

34,507 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 Erika Kirk's ALIBI Is Destroyed —Baron Coleman PROVES Erika Was Likely In Provo BEFORE The Shot.😱 Baron Coleman just released the most damning timeline yet. Using contemporaneous flight logs, transponder data, and deleted police dispatch audio, he has reconstructed the real movements of September 10th. The Conclusion: Erika Kirk didn't fly in to hold her dying husband. She was likely on the ground in Provo two hours before he was shot. Here is the step-by-step breakdown of the "Shell Game" they played with the planes to hide her location. 1. THE "GHOST FLIGHT" (10:06 AM) The Evidence: Flight N560TW (a private charter) left Scottsdale, AZ, and landed in Provo at 10:06 AM. The Theory: Baron believes Erika Kirk was on this flight. The Connection: At 10:05 AM—exactly one minute before this plane landed—the transponder of the mysterious Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) turned on at the Provo airport. The Implication: If Erika was on this flight, she was in Provo 2.5 hours BEFORE the "Big Bang" (which happened at 12:23 PM). 2. THE "REPOSITIONING" SHELL GAME After dropping its passenger (Erika?) in Provo, that same plane (N560TW) immediately took off for Santa Barbara. Why? To pick up Andrew Kolvet. It then flew Andrew from Santa Barbara to Scottsdale, arriving around 1:40 PM. The Switch: Meanwhile, the Kirk family plane (Delta Zulu) flew empty from Salt Lake City to Scottsdale to meet Andrew. The Decoy: Andrew likely boarded the Delta Zulu flight in Scottsdale to fly back to Provo, making it look like the plane was bringing Erika. 3. THE "FALLING INTO ARMS" LIE Official Story: Andrew Kolvet claimed that when he landed in Provo, he "fell into Erika's arms" on the tarmac. The Problem: The flight Andrew supposedly took (Regency) didn't land until 4:36 PM. The flight Erika supposedly took (Delta Zulu) landed at 3:12 PM. The Contradiction: Are we supposed to believe Erika landed and then sat around the airport for 90 minutes while her husband was dying at the hospital?. The Real Story: If Baron is right, Erika had been at the airport since 10:06 AM. When Andrew arrived on the decoy flight at 3:12 PM, she was there to meet him and stage the scene. 4. THE DELETED POLICE AUDIO ("SIGNATURE" VS. "DUNCAN") Baron played a saved dispatch recording that has since been scrubbed from the internet. The Audio: Police/Fire dispatchers are coordinating Erika's arrival. Officer 1 (Jesse): "Charlie's wife is coming to Signature" (The main FBO for rich travelers). Officer 2 (Corey): "No, no, no. They're landing at Duncan" (A remote terminal on the far north side). Why the confusion? If she was flying in on the family jet, she would go to Signature. The confusion suggests she was already on the ground, possibly hiding at the remote Duncan terminal, and the team couldn't keep their story straight. 5. THE EGYPTIAN JET CONNECTION Baron points out that the Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) transponder turned on three separate times that day—and each time was within 5 minutes of an Erika/Andrew flight taking off or landing. The Photo: A photo taken between 11:00-11:30 AM shows the Egyptian jet sitting on the tarmac with its ladder down and windows closed. Baron's Theory: Erika may have been sitting on that plane (a communications hub) while waiting for the event to unfold. THE VERDICT The timeline destroys the alibi. If Erika Kirk was in Provo at 10:06 AM, she lied to the police, she lied to the public, and she placed herself at the scene of the crime. "If you say you weren't at the scene of the crime, but you turned out you were... you look guilty." Be sure to FOLLOW Baron Coleman and go watch his FULL Episode, linked down below👇

Project Constitution

194,911 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

‼️UNEARTHED: The 2014 "SCRUBBED" Interview of Kaitlin Kolvet, Wife Of TPUSA PR Guy Andrew Kolvet 👀 As we dig deeper into the power structures surrounding the late Charlie Kirk, we have to look at the people behind the TPUSA machine and the familes that connect them, we’ve recovered a rare, archived 2014 interview—one that has largely been scrubbed from the active web—giving us a window into the woman behind the man who controls the TPUSA narrative: Kaitlin Kolvet. Just months after her marriage to Andrew Kolvet (the gatekeeper for TPUSA and the Kirk family), Kaitlin sat down to discuss her business, La Fete Weddings, in Santa Barbara. While it reads like a lifestyle piece, for those of us investigating the Kirk empire, it’s a blueprint for how this inner circle operates. 1. The Master of High-Stakes Production In the interview, Kaitlin reveals her background as a high-end wedding planner for the Santa Barbara elite. She wasn't just "organizing events"—she was managing million-dollar productions where "perfection" wasn't an option, it was a requirement. This is the exact skill set that was later injected into Turning Point USA. The transition from "student activist group" to "global media juggernaut" with rock-star lighting, pyrotechnics, and flawless staging mirrors Kaitlin’s professional training. The "image" of the conservative movement was built by someone who spent years making sure not a single petal was out of place. 2. The Kolvet Wedding: The First "Grand Production" Kaitlin discusses her own wedding to Andrew Kolvet, describing it as a "classic, elegant" Santa Barbara affair. This was the moment the "Kolvet Brand" was born. For the investigation, this matters because it establishes the timeline of the Andrew-Kaitlin power dynamic. They weren't just a couple; they were a professional unit specialized in reputation management and high-level optics. When Andrew became Charlie Kirk’s primary spokesperson, he had a professional "Image Architect" at his side. 3. Why Was This Interview Scrubbed? The fact that this interview was deleted from the live web is a red flag. As we’ve noted in our investigation, the Kolvets have been meticulous about their digital footprint. Is it because it shows a level of California "elitism" that clashes with the grassroots "populist" brand TPUSA promotes? Or does it highlight a professional history in curating narratives that makes their current roles as "truth-seekers" look more like "brand managers"? 📩 HAVE MORE INFO? If you have more archived data or inside knowledge on the Kolvet/Kirk dynamic, DM or email: [email protected]

Project Constitution

142,112 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 EXPOSED: How Frank Turek Just ACCIDENTALLY Exposed The Sept 10th Cover-Up—Erika Had To Have Allegedly Traveled On An EARLIER Flight To Utah 😱 Candace Owens just broke down a massive new piece of the puzzle regarding the timeline of September 10th, and it completely shatters the official story about the infamous "tarmac hug" between Andrew Kolvet and Erika Kirk. If you thought the timeline was messy before, wait until you see this math. THE FRANK TUREK TIMELINE Frank Turek (a former Navy officer and one of the only people who hasn't been caught lying in this entire saga) gave an interview detailing the events at the hospital. Because he is a military man, he is incredibly precise with time. He stated on the record that Erika Kirk arrived at the hospital around 4:00 PM. THE LOGISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY Here is why that completely destroys the official narrative: TPUSA and Erika claim that she met Andrew Kolvet on the runway when his plane landed from Santa Barbara. The problem? That plane didn't land in Provo until 4:40 PM. * It is a 20-minute drive from the airport to the hospital with zero traffic. By the time you factor in deplaning, the emotional tarmac hug, moving to the cars, and driving to the hospital in the middle of an active manhunt with SWAT teams everywhere, the absolute earliest they could have arrived at the hospital is 5:15 PM. If Erika met Andrew's plane at 4:40 PM, she could not have been at the hospital at 4:00 PM. The math is impossible. THE ONLY WAY IT WORKS Candace believes both Frank Turek AND Andrew Kolvet are telling the truth. She believes the tarmac hug really happened, and she believes they arrived at the hospital at 4:00 PM. There is only one way both of those things can be true: Erika Kirk had to have flown into Utah on an entirely different, earlier flight. And the only plane that fits that timeline? Charlie Kirk's plane, which landed at 3:31 PM. That would give them exactly enough time to have the tarmac hug, deplane, get a police escort, and arrive at the hospital by 4:00 PM, exactly as Frank Turek stated. THE BOTTOM LINE Every time we find a discrepancy between Andrew Kolvet's story and Erika Kirk's story, it turns out Erika is the one lying. She threw Andrew under the bus regarding the 30-06 caliber text, and she is throwing him under the bus now. Erika was not on that 4:40 PM flight. The official story is a fabrication. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL podcast below. 👇

Project Constitution

29,209 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Charlie Kirk Show Blasts Megyn Kelly: “Wound Collecting” Leftist Tactic Exposed! “Crazies will hurl an accusation... this stuff is like it will drive fringy people skitso people crazy... it will drive them to violence." ~ Andrew Kolvet This week, "The Charlie Kirk Show" with Blake Neff and Andrew Kolvet responded to remarks made by Megyn Kelly during her interview with Shawn Ryan earlier that week. Neff struggled to pinpoint the right description for the rhetoric he was hearing, saying, “I’m fishing for the right word to use, but it feels like… it feels like wound collecting if you’ve ever heard of that.” Kolvet immediately agreed, adding, “That sounds like a leftist tactic.” Neff replied, “Exactly.”The discussion centered on Kelly’s comments in the Shawn Ryan interview, where she declared of certain conspiracy-laden views, “It’s core MAGA now.” When Ryan responded with confusion with “I have no idea," the exchange turned to claims that “Trump has said from the beginning pedophile supporting Israeli lobby.” Kelly followed up, “Well, I mean I have no idea,” before suggesting, “Need a different acronym.” Kolvet warned that such tactics are dangerously irresponsible. “Crazies will hurl an accusation and then if you address it then it’s like oh you defended yourself too much if you don’t address it well why are you silent on this topic,” he explained. “There is no right answer when it comes to pedophilia accusations they tried to accuse Erica of being like connected to Epstein this this stuff is like it will drive fringy people skitso people crazy people it will drive them to violence and so I don’t like seeing a conversation between two people that should be responsible in this way just echoing and parroting the pedophilia stuff and the Israel.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

30,589 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад