Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 BREAKING: Andrew Kolvet’s timeline doesn’t appear to match. In this video, Andrew says he filmed and hosted The Charlie Kirk Show live from the Yrefy studio in Arizona on September 10—the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated. But elsewhere, Andrew has said he was at his home in Santa...

BlackLineBrief's profile picture

The Black Line Brief

6,249 subscribers

68,897 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 THIS NEEDS ANSWERS. On September 12, 2025 — just two days after Charlie Kirk was assassinated at UVU — Andrew Wilson said on the Whatever podcast that a POLICE OFFICER AT UVU sent him a video of Charlie Kirk being assassinated. So I have some very simple questions: WHO was this police officer? WHAT exact video did they send Andrew? WHY was an officer at UVU sending this footage directly to Andrew Wilson? HOW did Andrew know this officer? WHY did Andrew apparently receive this video before the public? And WHERE is this video now? If Andrew still has it, RELEASE THE VIDEO. If this happened exactly as Andrew described it, he should explain who sent it, how he knew this officer, why it was sent directly to him, and what happened to the footage. WATCH ANDREW SAY IT HIMSELF. 👇 The public deserves answers.
2:06

🚨 THIS NEEDS ANSWERS. On September 12, 2025 — just two days after Charlie Kirk was assassinated at UVU — Andrew Wilson said on the Whatever podcast that a POLICE OFFICER AT UVU sent him a video of Charlie Kirk being assassinated. So I have some very simple questions: WHO was this police officer? WHAT exact video did they send Andrew? WHY was an officer at UVU sending this footage directly to Andrew Wilson? HOW did Andrew know this officer? WHY did Andrew apparently receive this video before the public? And WHERE is this video now? If Andrew still has it, RELEASE THE VIDEO. If this happened exactly as Andrew described it, he should explain who sent it, how he knew this officer, why it was sent directly to him, and what happened to the footage. WATCH ANDREW SAY IT HIMSELF. 👇 The public deserves answers.

The Black Line Brief

36,786 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

🚨 Andrew Kolvet just sat across from Piers Morgan and answered the question Candace Owens has been circling for a year: Where was he when Charlie Kirk was shot? Candace Owens already mapped the gap: 11 to 3, three hours, Santa Barbara to Utah, “unaccounted for,” not a single email reply. Watch Andrew’s response. He is not telling the truth.
10:53

🚨 Andrew Kolvet just sat across from Piers Morgan and answered the question Candace Owens has been circling for a year: Where was he when Charlie Kirk was shot? Candace Owens already mapped the gap: 11 to 3, three hours, Santa Barbara to Utah, “unaccounted for,” not a single email reply. Watch Andrew’s response. He is not telling the truth.

Grace Ashford

132,085 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

‼️BOMBSHELL: Blake Neff CONFIRMS Andrew Flew Into Provo From Phoenix- PROOF Andrew Kolvet Had FOREKNOWLEDGE Of Charlie Kirk's Impending Doom?😱 Blake Neff (longtime producer on The Charlie Kirk Show and one of TPUSA’s most vocal defenders of the official narrative) slipped in LouisianaGirl (Tara)’s late-night impromptu Spaces and said Andrew Kolvet flew into Provo from Phoenix, then immediately tried to walk it back: “He flew down that day, he flew down that day or flew up. I should say from where, from Phoenix. Oh, okay, or for wherever he flew in from, I I, I don’t wanna say from Phoenix.” The question came from Charliesangels47. Multiple people in the investigator community already clipped and noted it last night. Why This Matters For months, the maintained story from TPUSA insiders (including Kolvet and Neff) has been that Andrew Kolvet flew from Santa Barbara to Provo on 9/10, arriving in time for the now-famous “tarmac hug” with Erika Kirk . Candace Owens has repeatedly pointed out timeline problems with that story: Flight data showing movements involving the Santa Barbara → Scottsdale (Phoenix area) corridor right around/after the shooting. Police scanner audio indicating Erika was already being picked up ~3:30 PM. Questions about where people actually were and when they moved. If Kolvet was flying from Phoenix (or was positioned such that Phoenix was the accurate origin in Blake Neff's mind), that directly undercuts the Santa Barbara narrative they’ve been defending. The instant backtrack (“I don’t wanna say from Phoenix”) is the kind of tell that happens when someone realizes they just revealed something they weren’t supposed to. This doesn’t happen in controlled interviews or on their own show. It happened in an open Spaces with Charlie Kirk investigators asking direct questions.
0:27

‼️BOMBSHELL: Blake Neff CONFIRMS Andrew Flew Into Provo From Phoenix- PROOF Andrew Kolvet Had FOREKNOWLEDGE Of Charlie Kirk's Impending Doom?😱 Blake Neff (longtime producer on The Charlie Kirk Show and one of TPUSA’s most vocal defenders of the official narrative) slipped in LouisianaGirl (Tara)’s late-night impromptu Spaces and said Andrew Kolvet flew into Provo from Phoenix, then immediately tried to walk it back: “He flew down that day, he flew down that day or flew up. I should say from where, from Phoenix. Oh, okay, or for wherever he flew in from, I I, I don’t wanna say from Phoenix.” The question came from Charliesangels47. Multiple people in the investigator community already clipped and noted it last night. Why This Matters For months, the maintained story from TPUSA insiders (including Kolvet and Neff) has been that Andrew Kolvet flew from Santa Barbara to Provo on 9/10, arriving in time for the now-famous “tarmac hug” with Erika Kirk . Candace Owens has repeatedly pointed out timeline problems with that story: Flight data showing movements involving the Santa Barbara → Scottsdale (Phoenix area) corridor right around/after the shooting. Police scanner audio indicating Erika was already being picked up ~3:30 PM. Questions about where people actually were and when they moved. If Kolvet was flying from Phoenix (or was positioned such that Phoenix was the accurate origin in Blake Neff's mind), that directly undercuts the Santa Barbara narrative they’ve been defending. The instant backtrack (“I don’t wanna say from Phoenix”) is the kind of tell that happens when someone realizes they just revealed something they weren’t supposed to. This doesn’t happen in controlled interviews or on their own show. It happened in an open Spaces with Charlie Kirk investigators asking direct questions.

Project Constitution

200,711 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: A member of the Charlie Kirk group chat claims it is ‘verified’ that Joe Kent leaked the screenshots to Candace Owens. ‘We kind of verified that the messages had been given by Andrew Kolvet to Joe Kent, and that Joe Kent was the one who passed them on to Candace,’ said Pesach Wolicki, who was in the Charlie Kirk group chat that was leaked to Candace Owens. From Erin Molan’s show.
1:33

🚨BREAKING: A member of the Charlie Kirk group chat claims it is ‘verified’ that Joe Kent leaked the screenshots to Candace Owens. ‘We kind of verified that the messages had been given by Andrew Kolvet to Joe Kent, and that Joe Kent was the one who passed them on to Candace,’ said Pesach Wolicki, who was in the Charlie Kirk group chat that was leaked to Candace Owens. From Erin Molan’s show.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

1,542,943 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨Candace told the truth about everything! Andrew Kolvet finally confirmed that Bibi Netanyahu did in fact call Charlie Kirk just before his death. Andrew also confirmed that Netanyahu had expressed his desire to appear on Charlie’s show, but Charlie declined. 👀 Andrew wants us to believe that Candace was entirely truthful about everything else, but she was somehow lying when she claimed that Netanyahu offered Charlie Kirk millions of dollars, and Charlie declined that offer. Candace has never changed her story ONCE. The logical conclusion is that Candace told the truth about all of it, not just 2/3 of it. If that's the case, Netanyahu did indeed offer Charlie Kirk millions, Charlie declined that offer, and as a result, Andrew Kolvet lost out on millions of dollars. It’s also a reasonable conclusion that if Charlie’s support couldn’t be bought and he couldn’t be bullied into submission, the only viable option left was to kill him.
2:04

🚨Candace told the truth about everything! Andrew Kolvet finally confirmed that Bibi Netanyahu did in fact call Charlie Kirk just before his death. Andrew also confirmed that Netanyahu had expressed his desire to appear on Charlie’s show, but Charlie declined. 👀 Andrew wants us to believe that Candace was entirely truthful about everything else, but she was somehow lying when she claimed that Netanyahu offered Charlie Kirk millions of dollars, and Charlie declined that offer. Candace has never changed her story ONCE. The logical conclusion is that Candace told the truth about all of it, not just 2/3 of it. If that's the case, Netanyahu did indeed offer Charlie Kirk millions, Charlie declined that offer, and as a result, Andrew Kolvet lost out on millions of dollars. It’s also a reasonable conclusion that if Charlie’s support couldn’t be bought and he couldn’t be bullied into submission, the only viable option left was to kill him.

Travis

63,885 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Alex Jones exclusively reveals talk he had with Charlie Kirk 1 month before his passing expressing disagreement with the pro-war approach of the US with Iran. Charlie Kirk disagreed with Trump's stance on the Epstein files. Alex Jones challenges Andrew Wilson to a debate. I think because Andrew has been pretty soundly defeated by Candice, he would no longer be an appropriate opponent for Alex. We know he would mop the floor with Andrew in advance and so would not be so motivated to watch. At this point, if Paramount Tactical announced interest in debates, he would be good for Alex Jones first, and then if he does well, move on the Candace.
1:30

Alex Jones exclusively reveals talk he had with Charlie Kirk 1 month before his passing expressing disagreement with the pro-war approach of the US with Iran. Charlie Kirk disagreed with Trump's stance on the Epstein files. Alex Jones challenges Andrew Wilson to a debate. I think because Andrew has been pretty soundly defeated by Candice, he would no longer be an appropriate opponent for Alex. We know he would mop the floor with Andrew in advance and so would not be so motivated to watch. At this point, if Paramount Tactical announced interest in debates, he would be good for Alex Jones first, and then if he does well, move on the Candace.

Spirit of Admetos

45,794 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨Earlier today Andrew Kolvet publicly acknowledged that he was the one texting Charlie. In those messages, Charlie expressed frustration over what he described as pressure from Jewish-pro-Israel donors and even discussed adding Candace Owens to be a speaker along side Tucker Carlson at AmFest 2025. Andrew’s response? He discouraged Charlie from bringing Candace on, arguing it would be a bad long-term decision. Whether you agree with Candace or not, this exchange provides a firsthand look at someone close to Charlie weighing in on who should and should not have a platform. In my view, it raises important questions about the internal pressures and influence surrounding Charlie’s decisions leading up to his assassination. Watch the video and judge for yourself. Candace Owens
1:32

🚨Earlier today Andrew Kolvet publicly acknowledged that he was the one texting Charlie. In those messages, Charlie expressed frustration over what he described as pressure from Jewish-pro-Israel donors and even discussed adding Candace Owens to be a speaker along side Tucker Carlson at AmFest 2025. Andrew’s response? He discouraged Charlie from bringing Candace on, arguing it would be a bad long-term decision. Whether you agree with Candace or not, this exchange provides a firsthand look at someone close to Charlie weighing in on who should and should not have a platform. In my view, it raises important questions about the internal pressures and influence surrounding Charlie’s decisions leading up to his assassination. Watch the video and judge for yourself. Candace Owens

The Black Line Brief

47,106 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Candace Owens tells Andrew Wilson she believes it is possible Charlie Kirk was killed with an explosive rather than a bullet and argues the theory should be explored. Andrew Wilson: "Do you think that Charlie Kirk was killed with an explosive?" Candace Owens: "I think that it's a possibility, yes, and it should be explored." Andrew Wilson: "You have energy and you have mass, and the mass is moving in the air, the air has to go somewhere." Candace Owens: "Why is his shirt moving first, that didn't make sense to me. If you watch it in slow, his necklace breaks first, which I thought was very odd. And then you see a puff [under his shirt]. And then the next thing you know there's the entry wound on his neck." Andrew Wilson: "Do you see smoke?" Candace Owens: "I would not confidently assert that I see smoke." Andrew Wilson: "Do you think that an explosion generally would have smoke?" Candace Owens: "I don't think that there's any quality version of video that would get us to be able to answer that question."
1:53

Candace Owens tells Andrew Wilson she believes it is possible Charlie Kirk was killed with an explosive rather than a bullet and argues the theory should be explored. Andrew Wilson: "Do you think that Charlie Kirk was killed with an explosive?" Candace Owens: "I think that it's a possibility, yes, and it should be explored." Andrew Wilson: "You have energy and you have mass, and the mass is moving in the air, the air has to go somewhere." Candace Owens: "Why is his shirt moving first, that didn't make sense to me. If you watch it in slow, his necklace breaks first, which I thought was very odd. And then you see a puff [under his shirt]. And then the next thing you know there's the entry wound on his neck." Andrew Wilson: "Do you see smoke?" Candace Owens: "I would not confidently assert that I see smoke." Andrew Wilson: "Do you think that an explosion generally would have smoke?" Candace Owens: "I don't think that there's any quality version of video that would get us to be able to answer that question."

PBD Podcast

176,928 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Andrew Wilson’s own words tell you everything you need to know. During the debate with Candace Owens, Andrew admitted he’s only 75–85% convinced Tyler Robinson did it. By his own assessment, there’s still a 15–25% possibility that he didn’t. Then, in his closing, Andrew effectively conceded the debate was a stalemate—not the decisive victory his defenders have spent the last 48 hours trying to manufacture. But what Andrew did today is even more revealing. He went live on The Crucible and spent the stream trashing Candace Owens to his own audience while accepting money from viewers—but made sure the broadcast couldn’t be paused, rewound, or clipped and wasn’t left publicly available afterward. If you’re confident enough to say it live, have the courage to leave it up so everyone can hear your arguments, scrutinize them, clip them, and respond. Instead, the only thing we have is this 32-second clip. Here it is. Candace Owens Stew Peters Stew Peters Network Baron Coleman Ian Carroll Zach Costello Coach Colin Andrew Wilson Say it publicly. Leave it publicly. Let everyone judge it for themselves.
0:32

Andrew Wilson’s own words tell you everything you need to know. During the debate with Candace Owens, Andrew admitted he’s only 75–85% convinced Tyler Robinson did it. By his own assessment, there’s still a 15–25% possibility that he didn’t. Then, in his closing, Andrew effectively conceded the debate was a stalemate—not the decisive victory his defenders have spent the last 48 hours trying to manufacture. But what Andrew did today is even more revealing. He went live on The Crucible and spent the stream trashing Candace Owens to his own audience while accepting money from viewers—but made sure the broadcast couldn’t be paused, rewound, or clipped and wasn’t left publicly available afterward. If you’re confident enough to say it live, have the courage to leave it up so everyone can hear your arguments, scrutinize them, clip them, and respond. Instead, the only thing we have is this 32-second clip. Here it is. Candace Owens Stew Peters Stew Peters Network Baron Coleman Ian Carroll Zach Costello Coach Colin Andrew Wilson Say it publicly. Leave it publicly. Let everyone judge it for themselves.

The Black Line Brief

58,285 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 TPUSA CAUGHT LYING: Leaked Texts DESTROY Kolvet’s “Tarmac Hug” Story – Was on Charlie’s Plane the Whole Time?! 💥 The official narrative of what happened on the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated just completely collapsed. Tonight, Candace Owens took to her podcast and released the most explosive evidence to date: the leaked, internal group chat between Turning Point USA executives from September 10th. These messages directly contradict the official story told by TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet regarding his whereabouts, his flights, and the now-infamous "Tarmac Hug" with Erika Kirk. Here is the exact timeline Candace just exposed, and why it proves the syndicate is lying. 📉🕵️‍♂️ Andrew Kolvet, the chief spokesperson for TPUSA, told Candace a very specific story about the day Charlie died. He claimed that he was in Santa Barbara with his wife when the shooting occurred. He claimed he booked a private plane and flew to Provo, Utah three hours later (departing at PM). According to his story, he flew to Provo, stepped off the plane, and immediately "collapsed" into a "boo-hoo crying" hug with Charlie's wife, Erika Kirk, on the tarmac. Candace immediately suspected this was a lie. Why would Erika Kirk wait on a tarmac for over an hour for the PR guy to land instead of rushing to the hospital to see her husband? PART 2: THE LEAKED RECEIPTS (THE TRUTH) Candace just dropped the internal TPUSA communications group chat from that exact day. The chat includes Andrew Kolvet, Justin Streiff (the new COO), and Marina Minas (CMO). The timestamps on these messages completely destroy Kolvet's timeline. PM (Utah Time): Charlie Kirk is shot. PM: Kolvet messages the group, stating they can publicly confirm Charlie has been shot. PM: The team asks Kolvet a crucial PR question about putting someone on Fox News. Kolvet goes completely silent. For nearly two hours, the chief spokesperson for the organization is unreachable during the biggest crisis in their history. PM: Kolvet finally replies. His excuse? "Sorry on the plane, this just loaded." If Kolvet's official story was true, he would have been sitting in Santa Barbara from PM to PM waiting for his flight. He would have had full internet and cell service. Instead, his own text message admits he was "on the plane" and his messages "just loaded" (meaning he was in the air without Wi-Fi) during that exact window. PART 3: WHO WAS REALLY ON THE PLANE? Candace matched Kolvet's "blackout" window ( PM - PM) with the actual flight logs from that day. PM: Charlie Kirk's personal plane leaves Scottsdale, AZ. PM: Charlie Kirk's plane lands in Provo, UT. Andrew Kolvet didn't fly out of Santa Barbara hours later with his wife. The text timestamps suggest Kolvet was already on a plane during that window—highly likely Charlie Kirk's own plane. This means the dramatic story he told Candace about flying in later and having a spontaneous, emotional "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk was a fabricated narrative. PART 4: THE COVER-UP & THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE Because Kolvet was secretly in the air and unreachable, the burden of writing the official corporate death statement for Charlie Kirk fell to Aubrey, a 26-year-old junior employee. Marina Minas (CMO) forced this young staffer to draft the most emotionally traumatizing public statement in the organization's history because the senior PR executive was inexplicably off the grid. (Adding insult to injury, Candace notes that TPUSA leadership later fired Aubrey over a conversation with an Uber driver). THE BOTTOM LINE The Turning Point executives have been caught in a massive, verifiable lie about their movements and communications on the day their founder was assassinated. Why did Andrew Kolvet lie about what plane he was on? Why did he lie about when he flew? And why did he fabricate the story of the "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk? They are hiding something massive about the timeline of September 10th. And Candace Owens just brought the receipts. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her FULL podcast below. 👇
22:59

🚨 TPUSA CAUGHT LYING: Leaked Texts DESTROY Kolvet’s “Tarmac Hug” Story – Was on Charlie’s Plane the Whole Time?! 💥 The official narrative of what happened on the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated just completely collapsed. Tonight, Candace Owens took to her podcast and released the most explosive evidence to date: the leaked, internal group chat between Turning Point USA executives from September 10th. These messages directly contradict the official story told by TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet regarding his whereabouts, his flights, and the now-infamous "Tarmac Hug" with Erika Kirk. Here is the exact timeline Candace just exposed, and why it proves the syndicate is lying. 📉🕵️‍♂️ Andrew Kolvet, the chief spokesperson for TPUSA, told Candace a very specific story about the day Charlie died. He claimed that he was in Santa Barbara with his wife when the shooting occurred. He claimed he booked a private plane and flew to Provo, Utah three hours later (departing at PM). According to his story, he flew to Provo, stepped off the plane, and immediately "collapsed" into a "boo-hoo crying" hug with Charlie's wife, Erika Kirk, on the tarmac. Candace immediately suspected this was a lie. Why would Erika Kirk wait on a tarmac for over an hour for the PR guy to land instead of rushing to the hospital to see her husband? PART 2: THE LEAKED RECEIPTS (THE TRUTH) Candace just dropped the internal TPUSA communications group chat from that exact day. The chat includes Andrew Kolvet, Justin Streiff (the new COO), and Marina Minas (CMO). The timestamps on these messages completely destroy Kolvet's timeline. PM (Utah Time): Charlie Kirk is shot. PM: Kolvet messages the group, stating they can publicly confirm Charlie has been shot. PM: The team asks Kolvet a crucial PR question about putting someone on Fox News. Kolvet goes completely silent. For nearly two hours, the chief spokesperson for the organization is unreachable during the biggest crisis in their history. PM: Kolvet finally replies. His excuse? "Sorry on the plane, this just loaded." If Kolvet's official story was true, he would have been sitting in Santa Barbara from PM to PM waiting for his flight. He would have had full internet and cell service. Instead, his own text message admits he was "on the plane" and his messages "just loaded" (meaning he was in the air without Wi-Fi) during that exact window. PART 3: WHO WAS REALLY ON THE PLANE? Candace matched Kolvet's "blackout" window ( PM - PM) with the actual flight logs from that day. PM: Charlie Kirk's personal plane leaves Scottsdale, AZ. PM: Charlie Kirk's plane lands in Provo, UT. Andrew Kolvet didn't fly out of Santa Barbara hours later with his wife. The text timestamps suggest Kolvet was already on a plane during that window—highly likely Charlie Kirk's own plane. This means the dramatic story he told Candace about flying in later and having a spontaneous, emotional "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk was a fabricated narrative. PART 4: THE COVER-UP & THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE Because Kolvet was secretly in the air and unreachable, the burden of writing the official corporate death statement for Charlie Kirk fell to Aubrey, a 26-year-old junior employee. Marina Minas (CMO) forced this young staffer to draft the most emotionally traumatizing public statement in the organization's history because the senior PR executive was inexplicably off the grid. (Adding insult to injury, Candace notes that TPUSA leadership later fired Aubrey over a conversation with an Uber driver). THE BOTTOM LINE The Turning Point executives have been caught in a massive, verifiable lie about their movements and communications on the day their founder was assassinated. Why did Andrew Kolvet lie about what plane he was on? Why did he lie about when he flew? And why did he fabricate the story of the "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk? They are hiding something massive about the timeline of September 10th. And Candace Owens just brought the receipts. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her FULL podcast below. 👇

Project Constitution

30,531 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This weekend, Andrew Wilson made some rather basic factual errors about Charlie Kirk's stated position on Israel. Today, Andrew appeared on Joe Rogan’s podcast and claimed that Candace Owens is crazy for investigating any potential Israeli connections to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. As of a few days ago, Andrew was still unaware of the most basic facts surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death, as demonstrated in this video. It’s understandable that Candace is perceived as out of her depth, in his uninformed opinion, if he lacks the pertinent information that anyone engaged in a discussion about the topic should possess. To clarify for Andrew: Yes, Charlie Kirk did state that he had left the pro-Israel cause. No, we should not reinterpret a dead man's words to mean something fundamentally different. Yes, Charlie Kirk was deceased 22 hours and 29 minutes after leaving the pro-Israel cause. Yes, the then-acting Director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent, attempted to investigate potential foreign involvement in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Yes, the FBI obstructed Joe Kent from pursuing the leads he had already gathered. Andrew doesn’t even comprehend the most fundamental aspects of the case! Why should anyone take him seriously?
4:30

This weekend, Andrew Wilson made some rather basic factual errors about Charlie Kirk's stated position on Israel. Today, Andrew appeared on Joe Rogan’s podcast and claimed that Candace Owens is crazy for investigating any potential Israeli connections to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. As of a few days ago, Andrew was still unaware of the most basic facts surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death, as demonstrated in this video. It’s understandable that Candace is perceived as out of her depth, in his uninformed opinion, if he lacks the pertinent information that anyone engaged in a discussion about the topic should possess. To clarify for Andrew: Yes, Charlie Kirk did state that he had left the pro-Israel cause. No, we should not reinterpret a dead man's words to mean something fundamentally different. Yes, Charlie Kirk was deceased 22 hours and 29 minutes after leaving the pro-Israel cause. Yes, the then-acting Director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent, attempted to investigate potential foreign involvement in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Yes, the FBI obstructed Joe Kent from pursuing the leads he had already gathered. Andrew doesn’t even comprehend the most fundamental aspects of the case! Why should anyone take him seriously?

Travis

140,695 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

‼️Candace Owens Says Blake Neff and Andrew Kolvet Are Crashing Out As Their Narrative Falls Apart 👀 Candace Owens teased major updates on the mysterious burnt object seen in the backseat of the SUV that took Charlie Kirk to the hospital. She said new information from the public has them “onto something” regarding what that object actually was. She also called out Blake Neff for making a bizarre admission on X Spaces, where he claimed he blacked out on the morning of September 10th and doesn’t remember where he went or who he was with. Candace said his explanation was “frankly bizarre.” On top of that, she noted that Andrew Kolvet is finally admitting Charlie Kirk’s true feelings about Benjamin Netanyahu — something many have been pointing out for months. Candace suggested that the sudden wave of strange confessions and erratic behavior from certain people is happening because the public is no longer buying the official story, and the cracks in the narrative are becoming impossible to ignore. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇
0:48

‼️Candace Owens Says Blake Neff and Andrew Kolvet Are Crashing Out As Their Narrative Falls Apart 👀 Candace Owens teased major updates on the mysterious burnt object seen in the backseat of the SUV that took Charlie Kirk to the hospital. She said new information from the public has them “onto something” regarding what that object actually was. She also called out Blake Neff for making a bizarre admission on X Spaces, where he claimed he blacked out on the morning of September 10th and doesn’t remember where he went or who he was with. Candace said his explanation was “frankly bizarre.” On top of that, she noted that Andrew Kolvet is finally admitting Charlie Kirk’s true feelings about Benjamin Netanyahu — something many have been pointing out for months. Candace suggested that the sudden wave of strange confessions and erratic behavior from certain people is happening because the public is no longer buying the official story, and the cracks in the narrative are becoming impossible to ignore. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

49,579 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 WHO WAS FEEDING ANDREW WILSON INFORMATION FROM INSIDE UVU? On September 12, 2025, Andrew Wilson told Bryan Atlas on the Whatever podcast that someone “on the ground” at UVU told him Erika and Charlie’s daughter GG were there when Charlie was killed. Andrew claimed GG witnessed her father’s murder, tried to run to him, was stopped by security, and cried: “Why can’t I get to Daddy?” There’s a massive problem: this story has been repeatedly debunked. Why hasn’t Andrew corrected the record or at least explained himself? Not to mention Andrew got basic family details wrong. He calls GG Charlie’s “youngest daughter.” Charlie had ONE daughter. GG was his oldest child, approximately 3½ at the time. His son Mac, his youngest child. was 1½ at the time. I want answers, We deserve answer: WHO was Andrew’s source “on the ground” at UVU? Who did Andrew supposedly confirm this story with? In this SAME September 12 interview, Andrew also claimed a police officer at UVU sent him a video of Charlie’s assassination. A clip the public has never seen - a video Andrew says he personally received. That makes TWO extraordinary claims involving people supposedly on the ground at UVU feeding Andrew information or material immediately after Charlie’s assassination. Who were these people? Andrew says he confirmed it. Then name the source and explain the connection. Candace Owens Baron Coleman Zach Costello Coach Colin
0:29

🚨 WHO WAS FEEDING ANDREW WILSON INFORMATION FROM INSIDE UVU? On September 12, 2025, Andrew Wilson told Bryan Atlas on the Whatever podcast that someone “on the ground” at UVU told him Erika and Charlie’s daughter GG were there when Charlie was killed. Andrew claimed GG witnessed her father’s murder, tried to run to him, was stopped by security, and cried: “Why can’t I get to Daddy?” There’s a massive problem: this story has been repeatedly debunked. Why hasn’t Andrew corrected the record or at least explained himself? Not to mention Andrew got basic family details wrong. He calls GG Charlie’s “youngest daughter.” Charlie had ONE daughter. GG was his oldest child, approximately 3½ at the time. His son Mac, his youngest child. was 1½ at the time. I want answers, We deserve answer: WHO was Andrew’s source “on the ground” at UVU? Who did Andrew supposedly confirm this story with? In this SAME September 12 interview, Andrew also claimed a police officer at UVU sent him a video of Charlie’s assassination. A clip the public has never seen - a video Andrew says he personally received. That makes TWO extraordinary claims involving people supposedly on the ground at UVU feeding Andrew information or material immediately after Charlie’s assassination. Who were these people? Andrew says he confirmed it. Then name the source and explain the connection. Candace Owens Baron Coleman Zach Costello Coach Colin

The Black Line Brief

108,206 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

‼️CANDACE OWENS JUST RELEASED HER PRIVATE TEXTS WITH ANDREW KOLVET—From The Day Charlie Kirk Was ASSASSINATED 😱 This is the very first message Candace sent to Andrew at 1:40 PM on September 10th — raw panic, desperate for real information: “Please say he’s okay?” Then she follows up, freaking out: “Any details on where he was shot? I’m freaking out” “I saw the footage. I cannot deal with this.” This is exactly what a normal person with direct connections to Charlie’s inner circle does when they hear their friend has been shot. Meanwhile, Victor Marx claims he: Barely watched the video once Didn’t text anyone in the inner circle or security team (not Frank Turrek, not anybody) Just got “vibes” from his special forces guys and casually announced Charlie was dead over an hour before the President Candace isn’t buying it for a second — and this text exchange proves why. The contrast is night and day. FOLLOW Candace Owens ,RT and watch the full episode below. 👇 ⚠️ My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. 💪 🔗
1:22

‼️CANDACE OWENS JUST RELEASED HER PRIVATE TEXTS WITH ANDREW KOLVET—From The Day Charlie Kirk Was ASSASSINATED 😱 This is the very first message Candace sent to Andrew at 1:40 PM on September 10th — raw panic, desperate for real information: “Please say he’s okay?” Then she follows up, freaking out: “Any details on where he was shot? I’m freaking out” “I saw the footage. I cannot deal with this.” This is exactly what a normal person with direct connections to Charlie’s inner circle does when they hear their friend has been shot. Meanwhile, Victor Marx claims he: Barely watched the video once Didn’t text anyone in the inner circle or security team (not Frank Turrek, not anybody) Just got “vibes” from his special forces guys and casually announced Charlie was dead over an hour before the President Candace isn’t buying it for a second — and this text exchange proves why. The contrast is night and day. FOLLOW Candace Owens ,RT and watch the full episode below. 👇 ⚠️ My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. 💪 🔗

Project Constitution

64,469 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

‼️Andrew Kolvet Just ADMITTED Candace Owens Was Telling the TRUTH All Along 😳 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens reacted to Andrew Kolvet finally confirming key parts of her story during his recent crash-out. Kolvet admitted that Charlie Kirk declined to have Benjamin Netanyahu on his show and that Netanyahu did in fact call Charlie at Bill Ackman’s house after Charlie wrote him a letter. Candace pointed out that these are details she has been saying for months — details she could have only known because Andrew Kolvet himself told her. She also noted that Kolvet is still refusing to admit the most important part: that Netanyahu offered to take Turning Point USA “to the next level,” and Charlie said no. Instead of owning up to what he told her months ago, Kolvet is now trying to downplay it while still attacking Candace. She called this cowardly, especially after staying silent for 10 months while Candace was smeared, attacked, and accused of lying for saying the exact same things he just confirmed. Candace made it clear: Andrew Kolvet didn’t just stay quiet — he let her take all the heat while knowing she was telling the truth. In her words, he is the Judas of this story. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇
5:33

‼️Andrew Kolvet Just ADMITTED Candace Owens Was Telling the TRUTH All Along 😳 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens reacted to Andrew Kolvet finally confirming key parts of her story during his recent crash-out. Kolvet admitted that Charlie Kirk declined to have Benjamin Netanyahu on his show and that Netanyahu did in fact call Charlie at Bill Ackman’s house after Charlie wrote him a letter. Candace pointed out that these are details she has been saying for months — details she could have only known because Andrew Kolvet himself told her. She also noted that Kolvet is still refusing to admit the most important part: that Netanyahu offered to take Turning Point USA “to the next level,” and Charlie said no. Instead of owning up to what he told her months ago, Kolvet is now trying to downplay it while still attacking Candace. She called this cowardly, especially after staying silent for 10 months while Candace was smeared, attacked, and accused of lying for saying the exact same things he just confirmed. Candace made it clear: Andrew Kolvet didn’t just stay quiet — he let her take all the heat while knowing she was telling the truth. In her words, he is the Judas of this story. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

25,396 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Watch this video and timeline and tell me it doesn’t chill you. Ben was always TOO involved in the aftermath of the Charlie Kirk assassination for someone who hated Charlie and who Charlie explicitly and often communicated that he could not stand. His bizarre emotional investment is finally beginning to make sense. CANDACE
2:58

Watch this video and timeline and tell me it doesn’t chill you. Ben was always TOO involved in the aftermath of the Charlie Kirk assassination for someone who hated Charlie and who Charlie explicitly and often communicated that he could not stand. His bizarre emotional investment is finally beginning to make sense. CANDACE

Candace Owens

732,845 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

‼️BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD: Andrew Kolvet And Blake Neff Host Andrew Wilson On The Charlie Kirk Show And GASLIGHT Everyone About The Debate🤪 Candace just tore into Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff for their latest cope session with Andrew Wilson on the Charlie Kirk Show. Andrew Kolvet tried to claim Candace somehow “won” the debate but it will age poorly because she supposedly conceded every point. That is pure gaslighting. Debates do not age like wine. He lost, and instead of owning it the way Charlie always taught, they are rewriting reality in real time. Charlie’s rule was simple: if you have a bad night, admit it. The internet forgets a loss. It never forgets people who try to pretend it never happened. They are still pushing the same lie that the Cowboy Steakhouse receipt is a complete fraud. Candace has already spoken to the owner, the server has given statements, the receipt exists, and the FBI was contacted. The defense was still fighting for full discovery at the time of the preliminary hearing. Calling it fake will not make it disappear. The more they double down on these talking points, the clearer it becomes they are not interested in the truth. They are only interested in protecting the narrative. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇
7:57

‼️BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD: Andrew Kolvet And Blake Neff Host Andrew Wilson On The Charlie Kirk Show And GASLIGHT Everyone About The Debate🤪 Candace just tore into Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff for their latest cope session with Andrew Wilson on the Charlie Kirk Show. Andrew Kolvet tried to claim Candace somehow “won” the debate but it will age poorly because she supposedly conceded every point. That is pure gaslighting. Debates do not age like wine. He lost, and instead of owning it the way Charlie always taught, they are rewriting reality in real time. Charlie’s rule was simple: if you have a bad night, admit it. The internet forgets a loss. It never forgets people who try to pretend it never happened. They are still pushing the same lie that the Cowboy Steakhouse receipt is a complete fraud. Candace has already spoken to the owner, the server has given statements, the receipt exists, and the FBI was contacted. The defense was still fighting for full discovery at the time of the preliminary hearing. Calling it fake will not make it disappear. The more they double down on these talking points, the clearer it becomes they are not interested in the truth. They are only interested in protecting the narrative. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

14,725 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen