Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

BOOM 👊💥 David Schwartz Explains Consensus vs Proof of Work and Why $XRP is Better than #Bitcoin 🤯🤯 In XRP’s consensus, you don’t have to spend millions just to keep the blockchain secure. You’re not sucking money out of the ecosystem to feed power companies. 🫨🫨

32,347 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

11 Yorum

Brad garlinhouse (parody) profil fotoğrafı
Brad garlinhouse (parody)1 yıl önce

Genius 😎 David Schwartz explain everything I wanna see some maxis here 😂

Michael Anton Fischer profil fotoğrafı
Michael Anton Fischer2 yıl önce

Explore how Bitcoin transcends gold as a safeguard against inflation and central bank policies. ‘Bitcoin Nation’ delves into the essence of sound money, offering insights into financial sovereignty and the limitations of fiat systems. Discover why Bitcoin is superior to gold.

The Future of Finance profil fotoğrafı
The Future of Finance1 yıl önce

Consensus Is The Future, Go $XRP

𝕏aif🇮🇳|🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
𝕏aif🇮🇳|🇺🇸1 yıl önce

Not any doubt mate 🤝

Jesus my light and salvation profil fotoğrafı
Jesus my light and salvation1 yıl önce

XRP price is being manipulated

Altcoin Insider profil fotoğrafı
Altcoin Insider1 yıl önce

Damn I'm More confident

Wy profil fotoğrafı
Wy1 yıl önce

Respect

Jesus my light and salvation profil fotoğrafı
Jesus my light and salvation1 yıl önce

How ?

先物太郎 profil fotoğrafı
先物太郎1 yıl önce

🎯💯

Mariela Baldivieso profil fotoğrafı
Mariela Baldivieso1 yıl önce

¡Gracias por compartir esta perspectiva, es un tema bastante interesante! 🤗 La eficiencia energética del consenso en XRP es un punto clave en la conversación sobre sostenibilidad. 🌱 Si quieres aprender más sobre cómo la regulación de criptomonedas puede jugar un rol en estos temas, te invito a visitar mis páginas web y redes sociales donde comparto mi experiencia y conocimiento en blockchain y políticas públicas: [sitio web aquí] y [redes sociales aquí]. #CriptoDiputada #Blockchain #DiputadaMarielaBaldivieso

Crypto Khaleesi profil fotoğrafı
Crypto Khaleesi1 yıl önce

XRP is the future

Benzer Videolar

💥DTCC & Ripple 💥 🌹 Current Ripple Advisor, Former CEO of DTCC, Outlined DTCC’s Essential Demands — Which Mirror the XRP Consensus Mechanism 🌹🌷🌺 Rare DTCC Video and documents below 👇 🌹 Donahue on Central Management (2016) > “It is imperative to have transactions flow through something that can be subjected to central management.” — Donald Donahue, former CEO of DTCC, DTCC Blockchain Symposium, Future of Blockchain 🌷 Schwartz on Ripple Consensus (2018) > “Through the consensus process, validators agree on a specific subset of the candidate transactions … servers communicate and update proposals until a supermajority of chosen validators agree on the same set of candidate transactions.” — David Schwartz, Ripple CTO, Consensus vs. Proof-of-Work 🌺 Analysis Donahue’s statement and Schwartz’s explanation can be read as complementary articulations of the same requirement: that financial settlement infrastructures must be distributed but not uncontrolled. Donahue outlined the institutional demand for governance and oversight, while Schwartz described how Ripple’s consensus delivers this through validator coordination and supermajority agreement. Ripple’s architecture therefore operationalises precisely the type of “central management” Donahue considered indispensable. 🌻 Donahue on Automated Infrastructure (2016) > “A processing infrastructure that operates completely on automatic without a central managing hand would drive the financial system straight off a cliff.” — Donald Donahue, former CEO of DTCC, DTCC Blockchain Symposium 🌼 Nakamoto on Bitcoin’s Trustless System (2008) > “We have proposed a system for electronic transactions without relying on trust.” (p. 8) “The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work.” (p. 2) “Proof-of-work is essentially one-CPU-one-vote.” (p. 3) 🌸 Analysis Placed side by side, these quotations highlight the stark divergence between institutional and decentralised philosophies of settlement. Nakamoto championed a system deliberately devoid of managerial oversight, where proof-of-work and distributed consensus replaced institutional governance. Donahue, however, characterised such automation as a potential catastrophe for systemic stability. His warning thus functions as an institutional counterweight to Nakamoto’s thesis, underscoring the incompatibility between the governance needs of global clearinghouses like the DTCC and the ungoverned automation of Bitcoin. 🌹References (Harvard style) Donahue, D. (2016). DTCC Blockchain Symposium, Future of Blockchain, ft. Donald Donahue. [Video]. YouTube. Available at: [Accessed 14 Oct. 2025]. Schwartz, D. (2018). Ripple and XRP – Part 7: Consensus vs. Proof-of-Work. [Video]. YouTube. Available at: [Accessed 14 Oct. 2025]. Ripple Labs (n.d.). Consensus Structure. XRPL Documentation. Available at: [Accessed 14 Oct. 2025]. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Available at: [Accessed 14 Oct. 2025]. DTCC (2024). Annual Report 2024. Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation. Available at: [Accessed 14 Oct. 2025]. #xrp #xrpl #ripple

ProfessoRipplEffect

120,798 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: Ripple CTO Says “Bitcoin Can’t Win Alone — XRP Was Built to Replace the Global Finance in Next Couple of Years" 💥 David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz, Ripple’s CTO, sat down with Eleanor Terrett and Matt Hougan, and honestly… this might be one of the most important XRP interviews of the year. 💥 “There is no universe where Bitcoin is the only winner.” David said something Bitcoin maxis absolutely hate to hear: “It’s inconceivable there’s a world with only one successful blockchain… the entire space succeeds or it doesn’t.” Bitcoin can’t carry the entire financial system. The world WILL need multiple networks — and $XRP is one of them. He said early Bitcoin tribalism actually slowed down progress — and now institutions finally understand that $XRP isn’t a threat to Bitcoin… it’s the missing piece Bitcoin can’t provide. ⚡ $XRP vs. Bitcoin, Ethereum & Solana — “XRP was built differently.” David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz explained why it outclasses $BTC, $ETH, and $SOL at the job it was designed for: “XRP is the first blockchain not cloned from Bitcoin… it doesn’t use proof-of-work… it had issued assets before anyone… it has a native decentralized exchange.” “The XRP Ledger is a curated set of financial primitives.” 🔗 “Whatever Ripple builds — $XRP profits from it. Always.” “XRP is the only asset everyone can hold… the only asset that pays fees… the only asset without a counterparty… the bridge asset the network automatically routes trades through.” David explained: “You might not see it as a user, but $XRP routes trades behind the scenes.” Every new liquidity pool, every new stablecoin, every new RWA on XRP Ledger increases XRP’s usage without anyone realizing they’re using it. 🌍 “XRP will help replace huge parts of traditional finance in the next few years.” “Blockchain will replace significant fractions of traditional finance for ordinary people.” •banks → become blockchain apps •lending → becomes on-chain •investments → become tokenized •global money movement → becomes instant •and XRP sits at the center as the neutral, jurisdiction-free settlement asset

Diana

127,097 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The “scientific consensus” talking point was succinctly dismantled by Dr. Judith Curry in her interview with John Stossel back in October. 𝗝𝗼𝗵𝗻 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗹: “The overwhelming scientific consensus. That’s what people still believe.” 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . when you talk about ‘scientific consensus,’ like the Earth orbits the sun, you don’t need to say ‘There’s a consensus that the Earth orbits the sun,’ it’s a well-known fact. When you’re talking about consensus, it’s usually on a topic where there is disagreement, and a government has asked a group to come to some sort of an agreement on what’s what. You see it in science, you see it in. . . medical boards. . . So, it’s a manufactured consensus. It’s a consensus of scientists, which is different than a scientific consensus. . .” Dr. Curry goes on to explain that there is no consensus on the most contentious issues of climate change, such as extent of human contribution and the impacts. 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . there’s a true scientific consensus on very little of this, you know that, • The temperatures have been increasing for over a hundred years. • That burning of fossil fuels emits CO₂ into the atmosphere. • And, CO₂ has a radiation spectrum that sort of keeps the Earth’s surface warm, all other things being equal. Beyond that, there’s no real big consensus on anything. The most consequential issues we don’t have a consensus on: • How much of the recent warming is caused by fossil fuels? We still don’t know. • Is fossil fuel and is warming dangerous? This is the weakest part of the argument. There’s no agreement as to whether warming is dangerous.” 🔗 You can watch the full 40+ minute interview here:

Chris Martz

112,060 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce