正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The “scientific consensus” talking point was succinctly dismantled by Dr. Judith Curry in her interview with John Stossel back in October. 𝗝𝗼𝗵𝗻 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗹: “The overwhelming scientific consensus. That’s what people still believe.” 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . when you talk about ‘scientific consensus,’ like the Earth orbits the... sun, you don’t need to say ‘There’s a consensus that the Earth orbits the sun,’ it’s a well-known fact. When you’re talking about consensus, it’s usually on a topic where there is disagreement, and a government has asked a group to come to some sort of an agreement on what’s what. You see it in science, you see it in. . . medical boards. . . So, it’s a manufactured consensus. It’s a consensus of scientists, which is different than a scientific consensus. . .” Dr. Curry goes on to explain that there is no consensus on the most contentious issues of climate change, such as extent of human contribution and the impacts. 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . there’s a true scientific consensus on very little of this, you know that, • The temperatures have been increasing for over a hundred years. • That burning of fossil fuels emits CO₂ into the atmosphere. • And, CO₂ has a radiation spectrum that sort of keeps the Earth’s surface warm, all other things being equal. Beyond that, there’s no real big consensus on anything. The most consequential issues we don’t have a consensus on: • How much of the recent warming is caused by fossil fuels? We still don’t know. • Is fossil fuel and is warming dangerous? This is the weakest part of the argument. There’s no agreement as to whether warming is dangerous.” 🔗 You can watch the full 40+ minute interview here:show more

Chris Martz

143,129 subscribers

112,060 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

7 条评论

ockhams-scheermes 的头像

ockhams-scheermes2 年前

This is also very good on the bogus consensus

Chamanit 的头像

Chamanit2 年前

@RealDeanCain If the consensus is manufactured, then the public should be hearing the other side as well. Let's hear one side demolish the arguments of the other. Or not. Otherwise, it's only a sketchy, wishful-thinking theory.

Marcus Nancy 的头像

Marcus Nancy2 年前

The climate crisis is now officially a balding fat middle aged dude trapped in a dead end job and hoping he can make it to retirement

Agent86 的头像

Agent862 年前

@RealDeanCain Consensus was used by the church 500 or so yrs ago to support that the earth was the middle of the universe and later that the earth was flat. Anyone who said otherwise was scorned, maybe killed. Kinda like where we are today with the man made climate catastrophe.

Mark Reardon 的头像

Mark Reardon2 年前

Most cults make a big deal about consensus, which probably explains why they are a cult and not merely a group.

Robert kaapke 的头像

Robert kaapke2 年前

We are emerging from an ice age. On what day is that complete. Or do we gradually warm until we reach equilibrium. For the love of God a little common sense. How accurate is our testing from over 100 years ago. Did we hang a thermometer in a field 50 miles from civilization?

Hamilton Garmany 的头像

Hamilton Garmany2 年前

Nor should there be Consenus & the "Science be settled". We are currently witnessing, what Thomas Kuhn called a "Revolutionary Period" in Science...where 2 contrasting paradigms are competing for supremacy. This is the Nature of the Scientific Method

相关视频

We are told that there is a scientific consensus on #globalwarming. 97% of scientists agree that #CO2 is the #climatechange culprit. #Climate scientist Judith Curry says that:- “There’s a very big difference between a scientific consensus and a consensus of scientists”

We are told that there is a scientific consensus on #globalwarming. 97% of scientists agree that #CO2 is the #climatechange culprit. #Climate scientist Judith Curry says that:- “There’s a very big difference between a scientific consensus and a consensus of scientists”

Crypto Rich

12,207 次观看 • 2 年前

Stephen Meyer just exposed one of the dirtiest secrets of modern science. We’re constantly told: “Trust the science.” “The scientific consensus says…” But scientists are only exposing themselves when they say things like that, according to Meyer. “When scientists appeal to consensus, almost invariably, there isn’t one.” “You only appeal to consensus to shut down dissenting opinions.” “If there really is a consensus, you don’t need to appeal to one.” “Scientists never say: the consensus is that the formula for water is H2O.” “They only appeal to consensus when there’s actual debate, and they want to shut down a dissenting group of scientists who hold a different opinion.” “We’ve had this move made or applied against us numerous times.” “Proponents of intelligent design, or critics of Darwinian evolution or neo-Darwinian evolution will be told: this is settled science, and to challenge it is pseudoscience.” “When there’s an appeal to consensus… it’s usually a rhetorical ploy to silence an alternative perspective or a group of dissenting scientists.” “And this is actually ironically profoundly unscientific behavior.” “If there’s no serious dissent, you don’t need to appeal to consensus.” “When people appeal to settled science or consensus, it’s often a tell that there’s subterranean dissent that needs to be heard.” Stay tuned for my full interview with Stephen C. Meyer—coming this Saturday at 5PM ET!

Stephen Meyer just exposed one of the dirtiest secrets of modern science. We’re constantly told: “Trust the science.” “The scientific consensus says…” But scientists are only exposing themselves when they say things like that, according to Meyer. “When scientists appeal to consensus, almost invariably, there isn’t one.” “You only appeal to consensus to shut down dissenting opinions.” “If there really is a consensus, you don’t need to appeal to one.” “Scientists never say: the consensus is that the formula for water is H2O.” “They only appeal to consensus when there’s actual debate, and they want to shut down a dissenting group of scientists who hold a different opinion.” “We’ve had this move made or applied against us numerous times.” “Proponents of intelligent design, or critics of Darwinian evolution or neo-Darwinian evolution will be told: this is settled science, and to challenge it is pseudoscience.” “When there’s an appeal to consensus… it’s usually a rhetorical ploy to silence an alternative perspective or a group of dissenting scientists.” “And this is actually ironically profoundly unscientific behavior.” “If there’s no serious dissent, you don’t need to appeal to consensus.” “When people appeal to settled science or consensus, it’s often a tell that there’s subterranean dissent that needs to be heard.” Stay tuned for my full interview with Stephen C. Meyer—coming this Saturday at 5PM ET!

Jan Jekielek

11,823 次观看 • 2 个月前

The media insist a “scientific consensus” says climate change is a manmade crisis. “It’s a manufactured consensus,” researcher Judith Curry tells me. Curry knows—she once spread alarm about climate change. Now she reveals the nefarious ways “the science” is corrupted.

The media insist a “scientific consensus” says climate change is a manmade crisis. “It’s a manufactured consensus,” researcher Judith Curry tells me. Curry knows—she once spread alarm about climate change. Now she reveals the nefarious ways “the science” is corrupted.

John Stossel

631,421 次观看 • 2 年前

John Lynch was asked about them reaching for draft picks in the past couple of years according to the consensus: “I appreciate that you think that, it depends on whose consensus. We’ve got consensus in this building. That’s the consensus I care about.”

John Lynch was asked about them reaching for draft picks in the past couple of years according to the consensus: “I appreciate that you think that, it depends on whose consensus. We’ve got consensus in this building. That’s the consensus I care about.”

Coach Yac 🗣

158,875 次观看 • 2 个月前

Most of CT treats consensus protocols as boring and impenetrable. That’s a mistake. Under the hood, there’s an intense race to design faster, higher-throughput, and adversary-resilient consensus protocols. This work directly determines retail UX and explains why Ethereum, Solana, and other L1s obsess over consensus. For Episode 1 of TheCoordinate, I sat down with Kartik Nayak (Kartik Nayak), one of the world’s leading consensus researchers, to pull consensus out of the black box and build a first-principles mental model: how consensus actually works, how it evolved over 50 years, how today’s sprawling protocol families fit together, and what the next frontier of consensus research looks like. This is Episode 1 of TheCoordinate. Hope you enjoy it.

Most of CT treats consensus protocols as boring and impenetrable. That’s a mistake. Under the hood, there’s an intense race to design faster, higher-throughput, and adversary-resilient consensus protocols. This work directly determines retail UX and explains why Ethereum, Solana, and other L1s obsess over consensus. For Episode 1 of TheCoordinate, I sat down with Kartik Nayak (Kartik Nayak), one of the world’s leading consensus researchers, to pull consensus out of the black box and build a first-principles mental model: how consensus actually works, how it evolved over 50 years, how today’s sprawling protocol families fit together, and what the next frontier of consensus research looks like. This is Episode 1 of TheCoordinate. Hope you enjoy it.

Soubhik Deb

78,493 次观看 • 5 个月前

There’s increasing scientific consensus that melting arctic ice, caused by human pollution, is flooding the North Atlantic with millions of tons of freshwater which appears to interfere with the AMOC current - a vital system which circulates sea water across parts of the world.

There’s increasing scientific consensus that melting arctic ice, caused by human pollution, is flooding the North Atlantic with millions of tons of freshwater which appears to interfere with the AMOC current - a vital system which circulates sea water across parts of the world.

Channel 4 News

59,717 次观看 • 5 个月前

'That Was a Lie!': There Was Never a Scientific Consensus On Lockdowns, Masks, or the Vaccine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: "What happened was a relatively small group, a cartel almost, of very powerful scientific bureaucrats took over the whole apparatus of science — at least as far as the public eye is concerned — dominated the media, dominated the message to politicians, and as a result, we had a catastrophic response to COVID. And we're going to be paying the costs of that for a very long time."

'That Was a Lie!': There Was Never a Scientific Consensus On Lockdowns, Masks, or the Vaccine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: "What happened was a relatively small group, a cartel almost, of very powerful scientific bureaucrats took over the whole apparatus of science — at least as far as the public eye is concerned — dominated the media, dominated the message to politicians, and as a result, we had a catastrophic response to COVID. And we're going to be paying the costs of that for a very long time."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,347,379 次观看 • 3 年前

#Jaguars GM James Gladstone on the consensus board debate: “We build consensus internally, and that is leveraged at every pick point.” He added that consensus doesn’t always align because they don’t take into account scheme or the situation a player is coming into. (🎥 Jacksonville Jaguars)

#Jaguars GM James Gladstone on the consensus board debate: “We build consensus internally, and that is leveraged at every pick point.” He added that consensus doesn’t always align because they don’t take into account scheme or the situation a player is coming into. (🎥 Jacksonville Jaguars)

Ari Meirov

178,820 次观看 • 2 个月前

David Sacks: The Decades-Long Bipartisan Consensus on Free Trade was a Mistake David Sacks on E223: "We've had a bipartisan consensus in Washington for decades that unfettered free trade is a good thing." "No matter how big our trade deficits got, no matter how rich and powerful China got, no matter how unfair the trade practices got, no matter how many millions of our jobs in factories got exported overseas, this has been the bipartisan consensus in Washington." "And Larry, you're right that it started before the Clinton administration, and the George W. Bush administration definitely accelerated it." "But there has absolutely been a bipartisan consensus in Washington that this sort of unfettered free trade policy was good for the country." "Now, how do you change that? You can nitpick this and you can make all the process objections you want, but Donald Trump has changed the conversation." "He was one of the few people, one the few public figures in America who was right about this." "That throwing open our markets to these foreign products without thinking about the consequences was a mistake." "I think most people today would say he was right about this."

David Sacks: The Decades-Long Bipartisan Consensus on Free Trade was a Mistake David Sacks on E223: "We've had a bipartisan consensus in Washington for decades that unfettered free trade is a good thing." "No matter how big our trade deficits got, no matter how rich and powerful China got, no matter how unfair the trade practices got, no matter how many millions of our jobs in factories got exported overseas, this has been the bipartisan consensus in Washington." "And Larry, you're right that it started before the Clinton administration, and the George W. Bush administration definitely accelerated it." "But there has absolutely been a bipartisan consensus in Washington that this sort of unfettered free trade policy was good for the country." "Now, how do you change that? You can nitpick this and you can make all the process objections you want, but Donald Trump has changed the conversation." "He was one of the few people, one the few public figures in America who was right about this." "That throwing open our markets to these foreign products without thinking about the consequences was a mistake." "I think most people today would say he was right about this."

The All-In Podcast

126,225 次观看 • 1 年前

Here is Australia’s biggest retard @AbbieChatfield saying that global warming is a scientific consensus. Is she stuck in 2015? 😆

Here is Australia’s biggest retard @AbbieChatfield saying that global warming is a scientific consensus. Is she stuck in 2015? 😆

R3tards Down Under

31,385 次观看 • 3 天前

Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains in this short video why there is no “climate crisis.” She also explains what scientists actually agree on when it comes to the “consensus,” and what they disagree on.

Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains in this short video why there is no “climate crisis.” She also explains what scientists actually agree on when it comes to the “consensus,” and what they disagree on.

Chris Martz

116,035 次观看 • 1 年前

Eric Schmidt on what he calls "the San Francisco consensus": "There's a group of people that I work with. They're all in San Francisco and they've all basically convinced themselves that in the next two to four year, the average is three years the entire world will change." He's careful to flag the catch in that word "consensus": "It's true that it's a consensus, but it's not necessarily true that the consensus is true." So why do these people believe it? Eric walks through the reasoning. First came language-to-language models. "ChatGPT is the best one, they did a great job," he says, with everyone else catching up. Then came two additions: reasoning, and memory inside these systems. Put those together and you get what he calls the agentic revolution: "The agentic revolution… can be understood as language in, memory and language, language out." To make it concrete, he uses a deliberately mundane example. Say he wants to build a house in California. One agent finds the lot. Another works out the rules. Another designs the building. Another selects the contractor. And, at least in America, another agent sues the contractor when the house doesn't work. The point of such a "stupid example," as he puts it, is exactly that it's ordinary: "I just gave you a workflow example that's true of every business, every government and every group human activity." That's why he thinks the consensus carries weight: "When you understand that the agentic revolution and the reasoning revolution together really changed the way we operate as humans, then you understand why the San Francisco consensus is so powerful." On the reasoning side, he points to models that work a problem forward and backward: "It will blow your mind away, especially when you ask it a question that you have no idea what the question is about and you watch it reason." And he cites the numbers he's seeing: "Google now has a math model that is at the 90 percentile of math graduate students." More broadly, he claims, "we now have systems now that are 90% of all of the graduate school skills. You know, math, physics, and so forth." When something can do that, he argues, "it will happen at a big scale." This is where the consensus reaches its sharpest point: recursive self-improvement. "There's a moment when what is called recursive self-improvement, the system begins to learn on itself, where it goes forward at a rate that is impossible for us to understand. It becomes combinatorial in a way that we as humans do not understand." His verdict on all of it is two-sided: "This is both incredibly exciting and also very worrisome."

Eric Schmidt on what he calls "the San Francisco consensus": "There's a group of people that I work with. They're all in San Francisco and they've all basically convinced themselves that in the next two to four year, the average is three years the entire world will change." He's careful to flag the catch in that word "consensus": "It's true that it's a consensus, but it's not necessarily true that the consensus is true." So why do these people believe it? Eric walks through the reasoning. First came language-to-language models. "ChatGPT is the best one, they did a great job," he says, with everyone else catching up. Then came two additions: reasoning, and memory inside these systems. Put those together and you get what he calls the agentic revolution: "The agentic revolution… can be understood as language in, memory and language, language out." To make it concrete, he uses a deliberately mundane example. Say he wants to build a house in California. One agent finds the lot. Another works out the rules. Another designs the building. Another selects the contractor. And, at least in America, another agent sues the contractor when the house doesn't work. The point of such a "stupid example," as he puts it, is exactly that it's ordinary: "I just gave you a workflow example that's true of every business, every government and every group human activity." That's why he thinks the consensus carries weight: "When you understand that the agentic revolution and the reasoning revolution together really changed the way we operate as humans, then you understand why the San Francisco consensus is so powerful." On the reasoning side, he points to models that work a problem forward and backward: "It will blow your mind away, especially when you ask it a question that you have no idea what the question is about and you watch it reason." And he cites the numbers he's seeing: "Google now has a math model that is at the 90 percentile of math graduate students." More broadly, he claims, "we now have systems now that are 90% of all of the graduate school skills. You know, math, physics, and so forth." When something can do that, he argues, "it will happen at a big scale." This is where the consensus reaches its sharpest point: recursive self-improvement. "There's a moment when what is called recursive self-improvement, the system begins to learn on itself, where it goes forward at a rate that is impossible for us to understand. It becomes combinatorial in a way that we as humans do not understand." His verdict on all of it is two-sided: "This is both incredibly exciting and also very worrisome."

High Signal AI

31,085 次观看 • 1 个月前

The doctor who blew the whistle on child mutilation at Texas Children’s Hospital says the tide is finally turning. Dr. Eithan Haim says a paradigm shift is underway after the American Society of Plastic Surgeons recommended delaying gender surgeries for children until 19. He called it a “nuclear bomb” within the medical community. HAIM: “I believe something profound is happening, especially today, the last couple of days.” “You have the first major medical organization to break the medical consensus in the transgender industry.” “And that’s really important because the entire industry of gender medicine is based on medical consensus, because it cannot be based on biological reality or medicine or anything else.” “The sole factor is consensus, what they use in the media, politics, in their lawsuits, in the clinic rooms.” “The medical consensus is the lifeblood of this practice, and the fact that a surgical organization came out against this is massive.” “It is like a nuclear bomb.” “Because in the pecking order in the medical profession, the surgeons are at the top, when the surgeons say something other people listen.” “When you read that statement carefully…it’s not only the surgical interventions for children, it’s the hormonal interventions.”

The doctor who blew the whistle on child mutilation at Texas Children’s Hospital says the tide is finally turning. Dr. Eithan Haim says a paradigm shift is underway after the American Society of Plastic Surgeons recommended delaying gender surgeries for children until 19. He called it a “nuclear bomb” within the medical community. HAIM: “I believe something profound is happening, especially today, the last couple of days.” “You have the first major medical organization to break the medical consensus in the transgender industry.” “And that’s really important because the entire industry of gender medicine is based on medical consensus, because it cannot be based on biological reality or medicine or anything else.” “The sole factor is consensus, what they use in the media, politics, in their lawsuits, in the clinic rooms.” “The medical consensus is the lifeblood of this practice, and the fact that a surgical organization came out against this is massive.” “It is like a nuclear bomb.” “Because in the pecking order in the medical profession, the surgeons are at the top, when the surgeons say something other people listen.” “When you read that statement carefully…it’s not only the surgical interventions for children, it’s the hormonal interventions.”

Overton

13,877 次观看 • 5 个月前

Consensus Begins with The President Choosing People He Can Control — Otubanjo There are no democratic parties in Nigeria. Obasanjo was the only president who thought of his party and I give that to him. It is a waste of time talking about consensus, because consensus is not important and they can always win by dominating the convention with their people. The governors have autocratic powers. Prof. Femi Otubanjo, Research Professor of Intl. Relations & Strategic Studies, Nigerian Institute of Intl Affairs

Consensus Begins with The President Choosing People He Can Control — Otubanjo There are no democratic parties in Nigeria. Obasanjo was the only president who thought of his party and I give that to him. It is a waste of time talking about consensus, because consensus is not important and they can always win by dominating the convention with their people. The governors have autocratic powers. Prof. Femi Otubanjo, Research Professor of Intl. Relations & Strategic Studies, Nigerian Institute of Intl Affairs

ARISE NEWS

37,876 次观看 • 1 个月前

You might have heard Dr K.quai⚡💵 say that "zero-time consensus is a prerequisite to infinite sharding." 💬 But why❓ Listen to Quai co-founder Dr K.quai⚡💵 explain why ANY time variance in consensus puts a hard limit on the frequency of cross-chain coordination👇⛓️

You might have heard Dr K.quai⚡💵 say that "zero-time consensus is a prerequisite to infinite sharding." 💬 But why❓ Listen to Quai co-founder Dr K.quai⚡💵 explain why ANY time variance in consensus puts a hard limit on the frequency of cross-chain coordination👇⛓️

Quai Network ⚡️💵

36,007 次观看 • 3 年前

Threadguy explains why calling any crypto trade "consensus" right now is the dumbest thing he's ever heard "Everyone's talking about how Hyperliquid is too consensus, Zcash is too consensus, I'm gonna take profits... Bro, literally everybody is dead. The only people left, if you are still here and trade crypto, if you have any money in your portfolio, you're by default a sharp." "It's like we're sitting on the river watching 99% of the population's dead bodies float by. The pandemic just wiped everybody out. And we're like yeah washing your hands is too consensus. Bro there's like 30 people left. We're at the morgue discussing what tokens are consensus. Everybody's dead." "Imagine sitting through a year of down only price action in crypto and then HYPE is up 30% and you're like I'm out. I'm done. That's it. I got my 20%. Bro what are we playing it for 20%? Everybody's dead and floating down the river and you're the last 10 people that don't have Ebola and you're like seeking shelter and wearing an N95 mask is consensus. No, you're the last one alive. It's consensus among the geniuses."

Threadguy explains why calling any crypto trade "consensus" right now is the dumbest thing he's ever heard "Everyone's talking about how Hyperliquid is too consensus, Zcash is too consensus, I'm gonna take profits... Bro, literally everybody is dead. The only people left, if you are still here and trade crypto, if you have any money in your portfolio, you're by default a sharp." "It's like we're sitting on the river watching 99% of the population's dead bodies float by. The pandemic just wiped everybody out. And we're like yeah washing your hands is too consensus. Bro there's like 30 people left. We're at the morgue discussing what tokens are consensus. Everybody's dead." "Imagine sitting through a year of down only price action in crypto and then HYPE is up 30% and you're like I'm out. I'm done. That's it. I got my 20%. Bro what are we playing it for 20%? Everybody's dead and floating down the river and you're the last 10 people that don't have Ebola and you're like seeking shelter and wearing an N95 mask is consensus. No, you're the last one alive. It's consensus among the geniuses."

Kai

145,679 次观看 • 1 个月前

🌐🪖 Mark Rutte on Ukraine's path to NATO being blocked: "In the past, when I was the Dutch Prime Minister, I met with Peskov, Lavrov and Putin. And I can assure you that let them talk, and we don't always have to react. The situation is, as you know, that all allies are demanding a consensus for Ukraine's accession to NATO. And now, as you know, there is no consensus on Ukraine's accession to NATO. At the moment, the Americans are very insistent on a peace agreement. And I am grateful to them for that. And we are working closely with the Americans. And we, as NATO, are helping, wherever we can, to reach a peace agreement. And of course, as you know, they are conducting close negotiations with the Ukrainians. Today, negotiations are underway with the Russians." #UkraineWar

🌐🪖 Mark Rutte on Ukraine's path to NATO being blocked: "In the past, when I was the Dutch Prime Minister, I met with Peskov, Lavrov and Putin. And I can assure you that let them talk, and we don't always have to react. The situation is, as you know, that all allies are demanding a consensus for Ukraine's accession to NATO. And now, as you know, there is no consensus on Ukraine's accession to NATO. At the moment, the Americans are very insistent on a peace agreement. And I am grateful to them for that. And we are working closely with the Americans. And we, as NATO, are helping, wherever we can, to reach a peace agreement. And of course, as you know, they are conducting close negotiations with the Ukrainians. Today, negotiations are underway with the Russians." #UkraineWar

🌐geopolitics in the picture

57,934 次观看 • 7 个月前