Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨BOOM 💥 Robert Spencer Delivers a Master Class on Why Islam Has Never - and Can Never - Treat Christians as Equals Robert Spencer just destroyed J.D. Hall’s attempt on Tucker Carlson to whitewash 1,400 years of Islamic treatment of Christians. Hall claimed the Ottomans were “very kind” to...

34,255 views • 18 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Syria was one of the first places in the world to have a Christian community – the community is mentioned in the Book of Acts and St Paul’s famous conversion on the road to Damascus... Christians are not foreign to Syrian land; they have not been imported; they are, in fact, founders and original inhabitants. Name “Syria” is derived from Assyrian and Syriac Christian denominations, which constituted 80% of the country’s population before Islam arrived in 7th Century AD. Syrian Christians are survivors no matter which other group is in power, although they have suffered at the hands of most who have ruled or invaded Syria over time. Syria’s Christians pride themselves on their national identity, patriotism and participation in the struggle for Syria’s independence and their role during formation of modern Syrian state. Their support of the Palestinian struggle against Israel’s occupation and their Pan-Arab identity prove their unwavering connection to region’s peoples and their struggles toward independence. There are several theories have emerged to explain the caution and silence of Syria’s Christians towards the regime’s increasing brutality. They are afraid of the extremist opposition, and it is easy to single Christians out because they are concentrated in urban areas. They also tend to follow the line dictated by the leadership of their respective churches. And despite some token commanders, they are underrepresented in Syria’s military machine, for reasons ranging from a personal dislike of violence to preference for civilian careers, to meticulously calculated sectarian policy of the Assad regimes that have ruled the country for nearly five decades. The plight of Syria’s Christians stems from the fact that, while they have been used for show, they are actually marginalized by the regime and maligned by the opposition. Before Syrian Civil War, approximately 1.5 million - 10% of Syrian population were Christians. The number is thought to have dropped sharply in recent years, but by how much is unclear. There could now be as few as 300,000 Christians left in Syria today. Christians predominately live in and around cities of Damascus, Aleppo, Homs, Hama, Latakia and in Hasaka governorate. Most Syrian Christians are members of either Eastern Orthodox Church’s Patriarchate of Antioch and All the East or Syriac Orthodox Church (part of Oriental Orthodox family of churches). Most of the Catholics in Syria belong to the Melkite Greek Catholic Church. There are also a minority of Protestants, including Congregationalist, Presbyterian and Armenian Evangelical Churches. Like rest of the Syrian population, the Christian community in Syria has been hugely affected by the ongoing civil war and its consequences. Along with other minority groups, such as Druze, Christians are particularly vulnerable to community violence from extremist groups. Huge numbers have fled, leading to a dramatic decline in the number of Christians in Syria. More than 120 churches and Christian places of worship have been destroyed since Syrian civil war began. But main reason that Christian families are forced to leave is not targeted persecution, but the deteriorating living conditions, lack of employment or education opportunities, escalating living costs and continued dangers caused by fighting. 🎥© eastern_christians (IG) #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

90,031 views • 2 years ago

It's shocking to me that my argument is going over the Christian apologists' heads like a kufi. David, Avery, and others who run the "Islamic Dilemma" argument claim that the Qur'an says that the Torah is an authority for the Jews to follow, even after the Qur'an is fully revealed and preached to them. Supposedly, the Qur'an also says the Injeel is an authority for the Christians to follow, even after the Qur'an is fully revealed and preached to them. Jews and Christians are NOT required to follow the Qur'an or Islamic law for salvation, even when they are invited to do so. The Qur'an is only for Arabs, not for all of mankind. The Qur'an tells Jews to judge by the Torah, not the Qur'an! The Qur'an tells Christians to judge by the Injeel, not the Qur'an! The Torah and Injeel are also meant to be full legal authorities for the Jews and Christians respectively. They typically cite 5:43-48, 5:68, 10:94, 2:85, etc, attempting to justify their claims. These are some of their favorite verses to use in the Islamic Dilemma context. This is exactly what my authority argument is refuting. My arguments regarding the authority aspect of the Islamic Dilemma are meant to demonstrate that the Qur'an views itself as an authority, including a legal authority, over the Torah and Injeel, and over the Jews and Christians. Jews and Christians who are invited to embrace Islam and follow Islamic law must do so in order to attain salvation. If they reject following the Qur'an and Islamic law, then they will be in hellfire. If I demonstrate this is the case, then it debunks the authority aspect of the Islamic Dilemma. However, once that is granted, it demonstrates that the way these Christian apologists interpreted 5:43-48, 5:68, 2:85, 10:94, etc was wrong this entire time. It demonstrates that the verses that tell Jews and Christians to judge by the Torah and Injeel are not meant to be taken in an absolute sense. They should be understood merely in a general or partial sense. Otherwise, the only other option would be to claim that the Qur'an is internally and hopelessly contradicting itself. This means, as I explained in my debate with David, that even if I presented a verse of the Qur'an that said, "The original Torah and Injeel are corrupted and no longer authoritative" verbatim, they would just say, "The Qur'an is just contradicting itself." This is exactly what David and company do when they are being honest and pushed by my arguments. The reason why this is so important is because it demonstrates they are not reading the text of the Qur'an under a principle of charity. They cannot provide a consistent reading of the Qur'an by their own admission. According to them, some verses of the Qur'an agree with the Islamic dilemma and others disagree with it. Also, once my authority arguments are granted, by the same principle,0 we can argue that the verses they use for full inspiration and preservation don't require such readings. They could be read in a nuanced manner that is consistent with the rest of the Qur'an just like the authority verses. Why have I chosen to focus on the authority aspect, instead of inspiration or preservation? Does that mean I believe their texts are fully inspired and/or preserved? Of course not! The reason is because, if I'm being honest, the Qur'an has many more verses with greater clarity stating that the Jews and Christians are required to follow the Qur'an and Islamic law for salvation when invited to do so, then whatever it mentions about their books being textually corrupted. Also, the implications of this are massive for how we read the inspiration and preservation verses, as I've already mentioned. If Christians cannot grant this point about authority, then they certainly won't grant whatever I'd say about textual corruption from 2:79, 5:13, or anything else. I hope it's clear. It may take time for these points to sink in, but I will be beating these points like a drumbeat until there is no more jizyah to collect.

Jake Brancatella

39,152 views • 5 months ago

Sadiq Khan's pilgrimage to Mecca reveals his hypocrisy. Where are his "Trans Pride" flags? Why isn't he calling for women's rights and LGBTQ tolerance? Where are the other religions, the Jews and the Christians? As London Mayor, Sadiq calls for religious plurality, higher immigration and for us to accept lots of Muslims into our country. Why isn't he doing the same in Saudi Arabia? This a pilgrimage to the spiritual centre of the faith that guides him. And in Saudi Arabia, there are no churches or synagogues. As in much of the Muslim world, Jews and Christians were converted, expelled or slaughtered. The government still prohibits public worship from Jews or Christians, unlike Sadiq Khan's London, where he encourages mass public Islamic prayer. Why isn't Sadiq Khan calling for Jews and Christians to be accepted in Saudi Arabia and their public worship to be funded by the Saudi government? Clearly, it's politically expedient for Sadiq Khan to support religious plurality, women's rights, and LGBTQ rights in Britain now, but Britain's demographics are changing fast. The Muslim population is increasing rapidly, while the native British population declines. Once the demographic tipping point has been reached, will Sadiq and politicians like him still stick to the values that suit them now? Or will they switch to supporting the values that will be more politically expedient in a Muslim majority country, the values that are on display in Saudi Arabia?

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

110,426 views • 1 month ago

🚨 ALERT AMERICA: ANOTHER CHURCH CONVERTED - AND THEY NAMED IT “MOSQUE OF JESUS” Masjid Isa Ibn Maryam (“Mosque of Jesus, Son of Mary”) — Syracuse, New York This is the next church takeover — and they didn’t just convert a Christian house of worship. They spit in the face of Christians with the branding. They turned a church into a mosque… and then labeled it “Mosque of Jesus.” That’s not respect. That’s psychological warfare. Because Islam does not honor the Jesus of the Bible. Islam’s “Jesus” is not the Son of God. He is not crucified. He does not resurrect. And he does not save. The Islamic version of Jesus is used as a tool to refute Christianity, dismantle the Cross, and validate Muhammad. And that’s exactly why Christians must stop falling for the oldest deception in the book: ⚠️ “WE BELIEVE IN JESUS” IS NOT WHAT YOU THINK IT MEANS Muslim influencers and apologists aggressively target Christians with the same scripted tactic: They claim the Quran “respects Jesus”… Then insist the Quran’s version is more authentic… While quietly destroying everything Christianity is built on. This isn’t dialogue. It’s conversion strategy. Major Islamic online figures have built massive platforms pushing these narratives, using emotional manipulation, debate traps, and “same Jesus” messaging designed to confuse Christians and blur the line between truth and submission. ✅ THE CORE DIFFERENCE: ISLAM ERADICATES THE CROSS Christianity stands on one foundation: ✝️ Christ crucified and risen. Islam explicitly denies it: 📌 “They did not kill him, nor crucify him…” — Qur’an 4:157 📌 Those who say Christ is God are labeled disbelievers — Qur’an 5:17 / 5:72 📌 Christians are commanded to be fought and subdued — Qur’an 9:29 This is not a “small theological disagreement.” It is a direct assault on the center of Christianity. And the ultimate endgame is not hidden: Islamic tradition describes Jesus returning not to redeem humanity, but to destroy the cross and enforce Islamic dominance. THIS IS NOT “RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.” IT’S RELIGIOUS DOMINANCE. Churches across America are falling silent… …and mosques are rising in their place, not just as places of prayer, but as permanent ideological infrastructure. And now they are taking Christian sanctuaries and rebranding them with Christian names to neutralize Christian resistance. That is not coexistence. That is conquest. Church by church. City by city. State by state. America: wake up.

Amy Mek

60,340 views • 5 months ago

Conquered NYC... Once Again, Islamic Supremacists Seize Control of Times Square for Ramadan In a show of power and control, Islamic supremacists took to the streets of New York City streets to show the world they had conquered another Western city. On March 10th, thousands of Muslims descended on Times Square to "celebrate" the month-long Islamic holiday of Ramadan. (Not one media outlet is questioning WHY they are not celebrating in their mosques) The sharia-adherent event, held on the 3rd night of Ramadan, was called “A Historical Dawah Event, Taraweeh in Times Square.” First comes Dawah, then comes Jihad Dawah is the Islamic concept of inviting individuals to embrace Islam. Muslims set- up Islamic information tables at the event and “invited” non-Muslims to embrace Islam. While many might see this “invitation” as harmless, the “call” or “invitation” to Islam is a legal requirement before Muslims wage jihad against non-Muslims. The Koran speaks of Dawah – the Call to Islam. “We do not punish until We send a messenger.” (Koran 17:15). Tafsir Ibn Kathir, which legally defines every verse in the Koran, states this verse means Muslims cannot punish non-Muslims until they “give a warning” to them by inviting them to Islam. This is Dawah Islamic preachers also performed the controversial adhan, which declares the supremacy of Allah of Islam and sends the strongest message to Christians that Allah is superior to the Trinity and Jesus. Islamic supremacists use psychological warfare on those they aim to conquer. For example, they know it’s important to make people in the West accustomed to hearing the call to prayer or celebrating Islamic holidays. If heard or recognized often enough, it no longer seems out of place and instead becomes as normal as hearing church bells ringing or seeing Christmas decorations. Meanwhile, in some Islamic lands, it is illegal for Churches to ring bells, as per Islamic law (Sharia). The same concept applies to seeing women walking the streets in burkas or watching as the halal sections of grocery stores slowly occupy more space. These seemingly small concessions are strategic wins in Islamic supremacists’ larger battle to conquer. Check out my coverage of Ramadan in NYC from 2023:

Amy Mek

81,340 views • 2 years ago

🚨 ALERT AMERICA - ANOTHER CHURCH CONQUERED CROSS REMOVED ON CAMERA: ISLAMIC TAKEOVER OF A PHILADELPHIA CHURCH In Philadelphia, a Christian church at the corner of Germantown Ave and Seymour St is being converted into a mosque — and the people behind it aren’t even pretending it’s “just real estate.” They bragged about it. They celebrated it. And according to their own footage and posts, they openly announced the purchase as a historic victory for Islam: 📍 “Germantown Masjid just purchased the Church on Germantown and Seymour to turn into a Masjid.” Then came the moment that should chill every Christian in America: They filmed the removal of the cross. They didn’t hide the symbolism. They documented it like a trophy. This is not “community growth.” This is conquest messaging. This is the triumph narrative: another Christian house of worship falls, and the “Ummah” advances. And history shows us exactly what this means. ✅ THIS IS A KNOWN PATTERN In Islamic tradition, converting conquered religious sites into Islamic structures has long been used as a symbol of dominance, not coexistence. Look at the global examples: 🔺 Hagia Sophia — cathedral turned mosque 🔺 The Umayyad Mosque (Damascus) — built over a Christian site 🔺 Jerusalem — contested holy ground weaponized for Islamic political power 🔺 Córdoba — conquest glorified for centuries And now that same conquest psychology is being replicated in America, church by church. What’s happening in Philadelphia is territorial expansion. It’s spiritual erasure. It’s the replacement of Christian presence with Islamic infrastructure. And the message is unmistakable: This is permanent occupation. How many churches must be turned into mosques? How many Christian communities must be transformed? Before Americans admit what this is? When a community allows its sacred spaces, churches, schools, and neighborhoods to be absorbed, rebranded, and rebuilt by an ideology that denies the Trinity, denies Christ’s divinity, and classifies Christians as disbelievers… That isn’t “tolerance.” That’s a threat doctrine. ➡️ Islam does not revere Jesus Christ - it repurposes His name to dismantle His message. And while churches fall silent… Mosques are rising - boldly, strategically, and without resistance. America: WAKE UP.

Amy Mek

57,848 views • 5 months ago

Warning Texas! Radical Imam Yasir Qadhi: Muslims Should NEVER Marry Non-Muslims 🔴 This is one of the men leading the 402-acre Sharia City project in Texas. 🔴 This is the man who sits on the Fiqh Council of North America, pushing for the expansion of Sharia in the U.S. 🔴 This is the man ensuring that Islam does not integrate—but dominates. At Epic Mosque, Yasir Qadhi made it clear: ✅ Muslim men should NOT marry Christian or Jewish women in the West. ✅ Muslim women are NEVER allowed to marry non-Muslim men. ✅ Islam must rule the household—because non-Muslims cannot be trusted with authority. What Does He Mean by "Katabi" (Ahl al-Kitab)? When Qadhi says “Katabi”, he means “People of the Book”—Jews and Christians. Islamic law allows Muslim men to marry Christian or Jewish women only under strict conditions. But Qadhi goes further—saying even that should be banned in the West. And for Muslim women? It is NEVER allowed. Because a non-Muslim man would have authority over a Muslim woman—and that is unacceptable in Islam. And he admits this is not just his opinion—this is the unanimous ruling of Islamic law. This Isn’t About Marriage—It’s About Islamic Supremacy. 🚨 Qadhi says Muslim “authority” must be preserved. 🚨 He rejects integration, insisting that Islam must control the family. 🚨 He warns that interfaith marriage threatens Islamic dominance. ❌ Non-Muslims are NOT equals. ❌ Interfaith relationships are a danger to Islam. ❌ Islamic law must take precedence—even in America. This isn’t about religion. It’s about control. And this is the radical helping to build a 1,000+ home Sharia enclave in Texas—where non-Muslims will always be outsiders. America, wake up. This is political Islam gaining ground—on U.S. soil.

Amy Mek

137,705 views • 1 year ago

Per Tucker Carlson, Christians have it better in Qatar than Israel. The truth? There are 2x as many Christians in Qatar (~400K vs 188K), but they're almost all migrant workers. Despite Tucker's claim of "so many Christian churches in Qatar," there are SIX. Total. For 400K people. Meanwhile, Israel has hundreds of churches. Heck, there are more Baptist churches in Israel (17) than churches total in Qatar. Another key difference is that almost all of Israel's Christians are actually citizens. They vote, serve in the military, and hold elected office in the Knesset (Israel's parliament). By contrast, Qatar -- officially -- has NO Christian citizens. Why? Because in Qatar, it is illegal to convert from Islam. That's why Qatar closely monitors almost every significant aspect of Christian practice. All six churches by law must be in a single designated area, where the state holds ultimate control, and authorities force people to show ID in order to attend church -- a great way to ensure citizens aren't sneaking in. This is to say nothing of the reportedly horrific living and working conditions for the migrant workers, a system which many have likened to modern-day slavery. So to recap, Tucker took the only possible data points to show anything positive about Christian existence in Qatar -- the raw total number of Christians and the fact that they can attend church -- and obscured literally everything else. Even most paid propagandists would be a little squeamish with such open shilling. But not Tucker. Why?

Joel Mowbray

1,150,509 views • 7 months ago