Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Boop explains why he thinks Epic is testing a new 30 ping minimum comp feature: - Former Epic employee confirms having worked on it - They didn't disclose what they were testing this eval cup - Everyone who is playing the Eval is 30 Ping - NA Only

419twizzz's profile picture

XSET Twizz

15,802 subscribers

165,582 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ИгрыНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Aussie says Epic MIGHT BE secretly testing everyone having 30 ping. & Clix says this would make the game boring
0:43

Aussie says Epic MIGHT BE secretly testing everyone having 30 ping. & Clix says this would make the game boring

XSET Twizz

194,289 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Clix was shocked when he realized Fortnite is already testing out minimum 30 in Eval Finals. 😲 "They are going to announce it after Globals I am pre firing it"
0:30

Clix was shocked when he realized Fortnite is already testing out minimum 30 in Eval Finals. 😲 "They are going to announce it after Globals I am pre firing it"

Stack

97,477 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Clix explains why the“minimum 30 ping” change would be good for Fortnite,but wouldn’t help new players go pro… “The truth is ping matters but if you weren’t good on 30 ping you wouldn’t be good on 0 ping”
0:50

Clix explains why the“minimum 30 ping” change would be good for Fortnite,but wouldn’t help new players go pro… “The truth is ping matters but if you weren’t good on 30 ping you wouldn’t be good on 0 ping”

XSET Twizz

109,722 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Eomzo says non pros will still be bad with or without the RUMOURED minimum ping feature.... "The only advantage 0 ping has is pro on pro gameplay."
0:32

Eomzo says non pros will still be bad with or without the RUMOURED minimum ping feature.... "The only advantage 0 ping has is pro on pro gameplay."

XSET Twizz

186,661 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

SHXRK HAS ARRIVED TO THE PRAC ROOM🔥 He confirms he is playing Eval with Peterbot tomorrow 👀
0:26

SHXRK HAS ARRIVED TO THE PRAC ROOM🔥 He confirms he is playing Eval with Peterbot tomorrow 👀

Stack

76,664 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Boop & Fredoxie noticed Peterbot’s random Eval Cup win tweet gets more likes than some pros’ FNCS win tweets.😭 "He is carrying NA Central"
0:30

Boop & Fredoxie noticed Peterbot’s random Eval Cup win tweet gets more likes than some pros’ FNCS win tweets.😭 "He is carrying NA Central"

Stack

66,284 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Peterbot with the 1v3 in Trio Eval Cup 🔥 He is playing with Queasy & Scare this week👀
0:24

Peterbot with the 1v3 in Trio Eval Cup 🔥 He is playing with Queasy & Scare this week👀

Stack

59,941 просмотров • 5 дней назад

When skill gap existed, 32 ping and kills are instant, 30 ping on cs2 is like 90 ping on csgo🥲
0:29

When skill gap existed, 32 ping and kills are instant, 30 ping on cs2 is like 90 ping on csgo🥲

zendy

189,564 просмотров • 2 лет назад

From legendary action director Yuen Woo-ping, comes an epic new saga. BLADES OF THE GUARDIANS: WIND RISES IN THE DESERT arrives on Digital June 30.
1:53

From legendary action director Yuen Woo-ping, comes an epic new saga. BLADES OF THE GUARDIANS: WIND RISES IN THE DESERT arrives on Digital June 30.

Movie Coverage

10,898 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨CLIX CONFIRMS HE WILL BE STICKING WITH RAPID FOR TRIOS AND WILL BE PLAYING THE EVAL WITH PETERBOT He also says there is NO confirmed third yet & they are not locked for FNCS
0:25

🚨CLIX CONFIRMS HE WILL BE STICKING WITH RAPID FOR TRIOS AND WILL BE PLAYING THE EVAL WITH PETERBOT He also says there is NO confirmed third yet & they are not locked for FNCS

Clix Updates

66,184 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Holy cow, this is epic. Who are they? Must know! What voices!!
1:06

Holy cow, this is epic. Who are they? Must know! What voices!!

Hillel Fuld

91,082 просмотров • 1 год назад

your eval measured one system. production ran another. they start from the same idea and end somewhere else, which is why the number was right and the outcome was not. the code is the same until someone rewrites it for prod, because the eval lived in a notebook and prod is a service. then the data diverges. clean fixtures in the test, late and incomplete data in the run. then execution diverges. the eval assumed every call lands. production has retries, timeouts and rate limits. by the end the two runs share a name and nothing else. > why nobody catches it both sides are internally correct. the eval measured what it ran. production ran what it was given. neither one is wrong, and neither one is responsible for checking they were the same artifact. so the gap widens quietly. someone patches prod without touching the eval. someone adds a fixture without touching prod. no test anywhere fails. > what to actually do ship one artifact. the code that was measured is the code that runs. model the friction. whatever the real environment charges you, charge it in the eval too. easiest way to see the gap on your own idea, without writing the harness: (only first 100 registrated) it runs the tested code live, unchanged. that is the whole point. and treat the eval as a prior, not a result. it tells you what to expect. only the live run tells you what happened. your eval was accurate. it was accurate about something you never shipped.
0:49

your eval measured one system. production ran another. they start from the same idea and end somewhere else, which is why the number was right and the outcome was not. the code is the same until someone rewrites it for prod, because the eval lived in a notebook and prod is a service. then the data diverges. clean fixtures in the test, late and incomplete data in the run. then execution diverges. the eval assumed every call lands. production has retries, timeouts and rate limits. by the end the two runs share a name and nothing else. > why nobody catches it both sides are internally correct. the eval measured what it ran. production ran what it was given. neither one is wrong, and neither one is responsible for checking they were the same artifact. so the gap widens quietly. someone patches prod without touching the eval. someone adds a fixture without touching prod. no test anywhere fails. > what to actually do ship one artifact. the code that was measured is the code that runs. model the friction. whatever the real environment charges you, charge it in the eval too. easiest way to see the gap on your own idea, without writing the harness: (only first 100 registrated) it runs the tested code live, unchanged. that is the whole point. and treat the eval as a prior, not a result. it tells you what to expect. only the live run tells you what happened. your eval was accurate. it was accurate about something you never shipped.

Hanako

45,239 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Testing out X’s new feature. This is fun!
1:53

Testing out X’s new feature. This is fun!

Jeff Sunday

28,294 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"The standard of living for people under 30 is worse now than it was for their parents." Why? House prices. Tom Swarbrick explains why he thinks this is the case...
0:54

"The standard of living for people under 30 is worse now than it was for their parents." Why? House prices. Tom Swarbrick explains why he thinks this is the case...

LBC

12,365 просмотров • 1 год назад

The brand said the brownies were 130 calories but after lab testing it was shown that they were actually 250 calories and included a lot less protein than advertised on the nutrition label- This is why I only trust whole foods 😭
2:20

The brand said the brownies were 130 calories but after lab testing it was shown that they were actually 250 calories and included a lot less protein than advertised on the nutrition label- This is why I only trust whole foods 😭

Princess Pringle

201,940 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🔥 Pokémon Red is becoming a go-to benchmark for testing advanced AIs such as Gemini. But is Pokémon Red really a good eval? We study this problem and identify three issues: 1️⃣ Navigation tasks are too hard. 2️⃣ Combat control is too simple. 3️⃣ Raising a strong Pokémon team is slow and expensive as an eval. We find most of the problems are not fundamental to games themselves, but how they have been used. We believe game-as-an-eval remains a compelling and underutilized evaluation strategy. We introduce Lmgame Bench to standardize game-as-an-eval. More details and findings in our blogpost:
0:41

🔥 Pokémon Red is becoming a go-to benchmark for testing advanced AIs such as Gemini. But is Pokémon Red really a good eval? We study this problem and identify three issues: 1️⃣ Navigation tasks are too hard. 2️⃣ Combat control is too simple. 3️⃣ Raising a strong Pokémon team is slow and expensive as an eval. We find most of the problems are not fundamental to games themselves, but how they have been used. We believe game-as-an-eval remains a compelling and underutilized evaluation strategy. We introduce Lmgame Bench to standardize game-as-an-eval. More details and findings in our blogpost:

Hao AI Lab

69,089 просмотров • 1 год назад

Two Tesla Cybercabs testing in the South Congress/Downtown Austin, TX area! Keep an eye on how they look next to the Waymos around. 2026 is gonna be epic.
1:08

Two Tesla Cybercabs testing in the South Congress/Downtown Austin, TX area! Keep an eye on how they look next to the Waymos around. 2026 is gonna be epic.

Nic Cruz Patane

403,794 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад