Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Brandon Herrera Just Made HISTORY After Judge STRUCK DOWN Unconstitutional National Firearms Act Restrictions "If the only reason the NFA was constitutional was because you weren't registering the firearms, you were instead registering the payment of the tax. Now that the tax is zero, what the hell are you... show more

Benny Johnson

4,147,703 subscribers

134,963 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

“Shall not be infringed” A federal judge in Texas just struck down key registration requirements under the National Firearms Act after Congress eliminated the tax used to justify them. This is a major victory for law-abiding gun owners, but the fight is not over. I will continue fighting to eliminate unconstitutional restrictions on our Second Amendment rights. Thank you to Gun Owners of America, the Silencer Shop Foundation, the NRA, and everyone who fought for this victory. NRA SilencerShop Gun Owners of America #americansheriff #2a #america #arizona #freedom

“Shall not be infringed” A federal judge in Texas just struck down key registration requirements under the National Firearms Act after Congress eliminated the tax used to justify them. This is a major victory for law-abiding gun owners, but the fight is not over. I will continue fighting to eliminate unconstitutional restrictions on our Second Amendment rights. Thank you to Gun Owners of America, the Silencer Shop Foundation, the NRA, and everyone who fought for this victory. NRA SilencerShop Gun Owners of America #americansheriff #2a #america #arizona #freedom

Sheriff Mark Lamb

38,951 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Why are suppressors — a basic safety tool — so heavily regulated? The unconstitutional National Firearms Act of 1934 implemented burdensome regulations and a $200 tax on suppressors. Over 90 years later, that tax still exists. It was never about safety — it was about control. Last night, Ways and Means Committee passed my provision to cut that tax to $0. This is step one in tearing down the unconstitutional NFA. We’re just getting started.

Why are suppressors — a basic safety tool — so heavily regulated? The unconstitutional National Firearms Act of 1934 implemented burdensome regulations and a $200 tax on suppressors. Over 90 years later, that tax still exists. It was never about safety — it was about control. Last night, Ways and Means Committee passed my provision to cut that tax to $0. This is step one in tearing down the unconstitutional NFA. We’re just getting started.

Rep. David Kustoff

92,817 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We are very honored to have sold Brandon Herrera the first lawfully unregistered suppressors in 92 years. No Form 4. No registration. No tax stamp. No waiting. Brandon stopped by our storefront to be part of this historic moment and experience the new process firsthand. It’s a milestone worth celebrating for the 2A community. Come visit the Silencer Shop storefront and be part of history:

We are very honored to have sold Brandon Herrera the first lawfully unregistered suppressors in 92 years. No Form 4. No registration. No tax stamp. No waiting. Brandon stopped by our storefront to be part of this historic moment and experience the new process firsthand. It’s a milestone worth celebrating for the 2A community. Come visit the Silencer Shop storefront and be part of history:

SilencerShop

50,767 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

On 4th of July Independence Day, you should know the Income Tax was deemed Unconstitutional “There's no income tax in America until the Civil War. An emergency one Lincoln pushed after the Civil War, it's repealed 1892. They tried to have a peacetime income tax, it’s declared unconstitutional Woodrow Wilson pushes through the income tax, the 16th Amendment in 1913. It's a 1% tax on the top 1% richest people in the country. It's not to tax the people, it’s to go after those robber barons. The Rockefellers, Carnegies, J. Paul Getty's, the Astors. It would be sort of like today that only Warren Buffett and Bill Gates and George Soros, that's what the tax is for. And so you have Taft, pushing through a corporate income tax. And only the extreme wealthy owned corporate stock, so it was a backdoor way to get at them. Teddy Roosevelt was responsible for inheritance tax, because only the extreme wealthy had an inheritance worth leaving. But finally, Woodrow Wilson pushes through the income tax, which is the 1% tax on the top 1% richest people.” And today this is all applied to everyone Let me clearly break down the order of events: During the Civil War era (1861–1872) The first federal income tax was enacted during the Civil War under Lincoln. It was a temporary wartime measure. It was repealed in 1872, The Supreme Court upheld it as constitutional in Springer v. United States In 1894 there was another peacetime attempt at an income tax. Congress passed a 2% tax on incomes over $4,000 as part of the Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act. The Supreme Court struck it down in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. They again said it was unconstitutional So next in 1913 Congress forces an income tax on us with the 16th Amendment But what else happened in 1913? The federal reserve was established We had a central banking takeover and that same year they passed the income tax to steal from all of us This should have never been allowed to happened, the income tax was ruled unconstitutional It’s time to set Americans free and abolish the income tax

On 4th of July Independence Day, you should know the Income Tax was deemed Unconstitutional “There's no income tax in America until the Civil War. An emergency one Lincoln pushed after the Civil War, it's repealed 1892. They tried to have a peacetime income tax, it’s declared unconstitutional Woodrow Wilson pushes through the income tax, the 16th Amendment in 1913. It's a 1% tax on the top 1% richest people in the country. It's not to tax the people, it’s to go after those robber barons. The Rockefellers, Carnegies, J. Paul Getty's, the Astors. It would be sort of like today that only Warren Buffett and Bill Gates and George Soros, that's what the tax is for. And so you have Taft, pushing through a corporate income tax. And only the extreme wealthy owned corporate stock, so it was a backdoor way to get at them. Teddy Roosevelt was responsible for inheritance tax, because only the extreme wealthy had an inheritance worth leaving. But finally, Woodrow Wilson pushes through the income tax, which is the 1% tax on the top 1% richest people.” And today this is all applied to everyone Let me clearly break down the order of events: During the Civil War era (1861–1872) The first federal income tax was enacted during the Civil War under Lincoln. It was a temporary wartime measure. It was repealed in 1872, The Supreme Court upheld it as constitutional in Springer v. United States In 1894 there was another peacetime attempt at an income tax. Congress passed a 2% tax on incomes over $4,000 as part of the Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act. The Supreme Court struck it down in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. They again said it was unconstitutional So next in 1913 Congress forces an income tax on us with the 16th Amendment But what else happened in 1913? The federal reserve was established We had a central banking takeover and that same year they passed the income tax to steal from all of us This should have never been allowed to happened, the income tax was ruled unconstitutional It’s time to set Americans free and abolish the income tax

Wall Street Apes

161,362 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The biggest change to silencer laws in 90+ years. Starting tomorrow, August 13 at 12:01 AM, silencers and AOWs gotten through Silencer Shop can transfer with no Form 4, no federal registration, and no wait. What you need to know: Applies in the 27 states with no state-level NFA laws. 15 states still require a Form 4. The silencer must come from Silencer Shop or a Powered By Silencer Shop dealer. SBRs and SBSs are not included. The 1968 Gun Control Act still requires ATF approval, so a Form 4 is still required. The tax is gone, but the paperwork isn’t. The government can still appeal, so we'll keep you posted if anything changes. Thank you to our partners in this fight: silencershopfoundation Gun Owners of America Palmetto State Armory SilencerCo B&T USA Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. SAF and YOU. We sued the ATF. We won. And we’re not done fighting for you.

The biggest change to silencer laws in 90+ years. Starting tomorrow, August 13 at 12:01 AM, silencers and AOWs gotten through Silencer Shop can transfer with no Form 4, no federal registration, and no wait. What you need to know: Applies in the 27 states with no state-level NFA laws. 15 states still require a Form 4. The silencer must come from Silencer Shop or a Powered By Silencer Shop dealer. SBRs and SBSs are not included. The 1968 Gun Control Act still requires ATF approval, so a Form 4 is still required. The tax is gone, but the paperwork isn’t. The government can still appeal, so we'll keep you posted if anything changes. Thank you to our partners in this fight: silencershopfoundation Gun Owners of America Palmetto State Armory SilencerCo B&T USA Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. SAF and YOU. We sued the ATF. We won. And we’re not done fighting for you.

SilencerShop

350,719 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

The National Firearms Act was an infringement in 1934 and it is an infringement now. Thank you to Rep. Andrew Clyde for standing up for gun owners and advocating for the deregulation of suppressors and short-barreled firearms.👏

The National Firearms Act was an infringement in 1934 and it is an infringement now. Thank you to Rep. Andrew Clyde for standing up for gun owners and advocating for the deregulation of suppressors and short-barreled firearms.👏

Gun Owners of America

52,541 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 HOLY CRAP! After a judge blocks Virginia's Democrat gerrymander map, it has a REAL CHANCE of being FULLY struck down in the court system Make it happen! "Virginia's case is particularly egregious not simply because of the reasons the judge cited — he said that the proper process for putting on a constitutional amendment vote was not followed, and therefore, the whole thing was out the window. I don't know whether that'll hold up on appeal or not..." "...Virginia's map, this was a state which was 6 Democrats and 5 Republican seats. And people looking at this map that's been that's been put in place. If this is this referendum holds would be 10 to 1!" "Of course they said that they did it to ensure 'FAIRNESS!'" — Brit Hume H/t TV News Now

🚨 HOLY CRAP! After a judge blocks Virginia's Democrat gerrymander map, it has a REAL CHANCE of being FULLY struck down in the court system Make it happen! "Virginia's case is particularly egregious not simply because of the reasons the judge cited — he said that the proper process for putting on a constitutional amendment vote was not followed, and therefore, the whole thing was out the window. I don't know whether that'll hold up on appeal or not..." "...Virginia's map, this was a state which was 6 Democrats and 5 Republican seats. And people looking at this map that's been that's been put in place. If this is this referendum holds would be 10 to 1!" "Of course they said that they did it to ensure 'FAIRNESS!'" — Brit Hume H/t TV News Now

Eric Daugherty

99,095 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Scott Jennings on the Trump administration’s handling of the U.S. economy: “What they did is not for short-term gain. It was for long-term reordering of the American economy. And if you talk to their people, Bessent and Hassett and the others, they believe what they did with the tariffs, what they did with the tax, that permanency and other tax cuts in the summer is going to lead to a boom in 2026.” “The January data suggest that they might be right. But there's other things going on here regarding what kind of jobs we have in America. One of the big things I look at in the chart today was, we have the lowest amount of federal government workforce since 1966.” “Yet private sector jobs going up, government jobs going down that was the purpose of what they were doing to grow the private sector to shrink jobs. I've been working in Republican politics for 26 years. Every Republican I've ever worked for said they were going to shrink the government. Trump's the only one that ever did it.” “We literally have the smallest federal workforce in '66 and as a percentage of the overall workforce, the smallest on record. I want more private sector. I want less government. So, if you're a Republican and you look at that, you're thinking, gosh, this guy's actually executing on what they always told us they were going to do.”

Scott Jennings on the Trump administration’s handling of the U.S. economy: “What they did is not for short-term gain. It was for long-term reordering of the American economy. And if you talk to their people, Bessent and Hassett and the others, they believe what they did with the tariffs, what they did with the tax, that permanency and other tax cuts in the summer is going to lead to a boom in 2026.” “The January data suggest that they might be right. But there's other things going on here regarding what kind of jobs we have in America. One of the big things I look at in the chart today was, we have the lowest amount of federal government workforce since 1966.” “Yet private sector jobs going up, government jobs going down that was the purpose of what they were doing to grow the private sector to shrink jobs. I've been working in Republican politics for 26 years. Every Republican I've ever worked for said they were going to shrink the government. Trump's the only one that ever did it.” “We literally have the smallest federal workforce in '66 and as a percentage of the overall workforce, the smallest on record. I want more private sector. I want less government. So, if you're a Republican and you look at that, you're thinking, gosh, this guy's actually executing on what they always told us they were going to do.”

RedWave Press

179,089 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 President Trump just absolutely WENT OFF for SEVERAL MINUTES about charges being dropped against the accused reflecting pool vandal Another ACTIVIST JUDGE decided to get involved. We need a TON of impeachments. "Jeanine Pirro made a MISTAKE. It was VANDALISM." "The judge was EXTREMELY unfriendly to Jeanine, and frankly, I think she CHOKED, because the judge was really vicious. Instead of going after the people that did it, the judge went after HER and went after her department. And I guess she choked. I don't know what the hell happened." "They took knives or cutters and they CUT the materials, and they put their hands in and they PULLED IT." "These guys KNEW what they were doing, and they cut all the way along the base."

🚨 President Trump just absolutely WENT OFF for SEVERAL MINUTES about charges being dropped against the accused reflecting pool vandal Another ACTIVIST JUDGE decided to get involved. We need a TON of impeachments. "Jeanine Pirro made a MISTAKE. It was VANDALISM." "The judge was EXTREMELY unfriendly to Jeanine, and frankly, I think she CHOKED, because the judge was really vicious. Instead of going after the people that did it, the judge went after HER and went after her department. And I guess she choked. I don't know what the hell happened." "They took knives or cutters and they CUT the materials, and they put their hands in and they PULLED IT." "These guys KNEW what they were doing, and they cut all the way along the base."

Nick Sortor

340,643 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

Glenn Youngkin weighs in after the Virginia Supreme Court struck down the Democratic-led congressional redistricting map and slams Barack Obama and Hakeem Jeffries for bringing millions into the state "in order to try to deceive Virginia voters": "This was a big win...because what the Virginia Supreme Court did was render a blistering opinion that laid bare the deceptive process that Abigail Spanberger and the rest of the Democrat leadership in Virginia was trying to use in order to deceive Virginians. It was unconstitutional, and they go on to attack the process they used as not complying with state law, and the deceptive wording on the ballot measure, itself. But at the end of the day, they declared it wholly unconstitutional...[Democrats] knew this. They knowingly violated the Virginia Constitution..."

Glenn Youngkin weighs in after the Virginia Supreme Court struck down the Democratic-led congressional redistricting map and slams Barack Obama and Hakeem Jeffries for bringing millions into the state "in order to try to deceive Virginia voters": "This was a big win...because what the Virginia Supreme Court did was render a blistering opinion that laid bare the deceptive process that Abigail Spanberger and the rest of the Democrat leadership in Virginia was trying to use in order to deceive Virginians. It was unconstitutional, and they go on to attack the process they used as not complying with state law, and the deceptive wording on the ballot measure, itself. But at the end of the day, they declared it wholly unconstitutional...[Democrats] knew this. They knowingly violated the Virginia Constitution..."

Julia 🇺🇸

25,405 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

What another AMAZING “coincidence” California had just passed new tax laws, if your home burns down and you don’t rebuild within 2 years (impossible in California) you lose your tax basis. Your property taxes SKYROCKET to the new values of the property “Think about a home that was purchased many years ago for $5 million. Let's say they were paying $65,000 a year in property taxes. Property goes up a lot over time, especially in these areas. Maybe the value today is $30 million. They go to rebuild it. If it was not, if they couldn't transfer the tax basis, you're looking at like $400,000 a year that they would have to pay” “In 2020, California voters approved a bill that basically said that if your house burns down in a fire, you can transfer the tax basis of that property to something that you buy or something that you build. But you only have two years to do it.” So some of the most expensive homes and properties the entire world now will get reassessed to pay maximum property tax values….

What another AMAZING “coincidence” California had just passed new tax laws, if your home burns down and you don’t rebuild within 2 years (impossible in California) you lose your tax basis. Your property taxes SKYROCKET to the new values of the property “Think about a home that was purchased many years ago for $5 million. Let's say they were paying $65,000 a year in property taxes. Property goes up a lot over time, especially in these areas. Maybe the value today is $30 million. They go to rebuild it. If it was not, if they couldn't transfer the tax basis, you're looking at like $400,000 a year that they would have to pay” “In 2020, California voters approved a bill that basically said that if your house burns down in a fire, you can transfer the tax basis of that property to something that you buy or something that you build. But you only have two years to do it.” So some of the most expensive homes and properties the entire world now will get reassessed to pay maximum property tax values….

Wall Street Apes

3,035,819 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There was a case in Michigan where a mosque was paying for female genitalia mutilation surgeries to be done on minor firms The Muslim doctors were charged and it went all the way to federal court The Federal judge dismissed all charges… This is where we are as a country with the Islamic takeover of America “Mosque right here in the United States was paying for these procedures on little girls aged six to eight. These girls were from Michigan, Minnesota, and Illinois. The worst thing, this case went to federal court. This, this went before a federal judge, and you know what happened with that federal judge? He dismissed all the charges, finding that the ban on FGM was unconstitutional. That's what happened in the end. They all got away scot-free after doing this to little girls. Again, here in the United States of America” Islam is not compatible with Western Civilization

There was a case in Michigan where a mosque was paying for female genitalia mutilation surgeries to be done on minor firms The Muslim doctors were charged and it went all the way to federal court The Federal judge dismissed all charges… This is where we are as a country with the Islamic takeover of America “Mosque right here in the United States was paying for these procedures on little girls aged six to eight. These girls were from Michigan, Minnesota, and Illinois. The worst thing, this case went to federal court. This, this went before a federal judge, and you know what happened with that federal judge? He dismissed all the charges, finding that the ban on FGM was unconstitutional. That's what happened in the end. They all got away scot-free after doing this to little girls. Again, here in the United States of America” Islam is not compatible with Western Civilization

Wall Street Apes

370,864 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

DOJ's AAG Harmeet Dhillon released this video on the 2nd Amendment less than two months ago. Earlier this week they made one of the, if not the, most aggressive cases ever in court *IN FAVOR* of keeping SBRs/SBSs/suppressors/etc... on the NFA despite the tax being removed by congress (the NFA is a tax, so if there's no tax then...) earlier this year. This video and that legal position are incongruent. #2nd #2a #WTF #fail #CivilRights

DOJ's AAG Harmeet Dhillon released this video on the 2nd Amendment less than two months ago. Earlier this week they made one of the, if not the, most aggressive cases ever in court IN FAVOR of keeping SBRs/SBSs/suppressors/etc... on the NFA despite the tax being removed by congress (the NFA is a tax, so if there's no tax then...) earlier this year. This video and that legal position are incongruent. #2nd #2a #WTF #fail #CivilRights

Mrgunsngear

218,318 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

MS NOW’s Katy Tur at 304pm Eastern: “Has there been tension with the National Guard? I mean, NPR spoke with a number of National Guard members from Ohio on the condition of anonymity, and they talked to them just the other day, November 10, and they talked about the deployment to various cities, including D.C. One said, this is not what I signed up for. Three of them declined voluntary deployments, and they were deeply uncomfortable with what they were doing. Has it been tense with the National Guard around?” Tom Manger: “So, it has not been tense as far as the public and the National Guard, but I think it's it really is no secret that many of the national Guard's folks, National Guard folks, don't understand what the purpose of their being there is. I know that I'll have quick interactions with them when I see them occasionally. And, you know, they'll – they'll roll their eyes. They'll – you know, one of them said that he thought it was a waste of time. And so, I – and I think they – they understood at first when they were deployed there with all the other federal resources. But then so many of the federal resources have been pulled back out of D.C. and yet, the National Guard has stayed there. And they're staying at – at first, it was the touristy spots. You saw them down near the museums and the monuments along the mall, and then it seemed like they that they were deployed to many of the downtown subway metro stations. And so, I know that – I don't – I don't feel like there's tension with the public and the National Guard or with their presence. But I do think that that that many of them wonder why they're there, why they're there, what their purpose is and how long they're going to be there. Tur: “Their presence is also under question whether it's legal. Last week, a federal judge ruled the trump administration's deployment of the National Guard in D.C. was unlawful, arguing it lacks authority and is violating the District of Columbia's sovereign powers, under the Home Rule Act. The Trump administration is appealing that order. They filed their appeal, Ken, last night.”

MS NOW’s Katy Tur at 304pm Eastern: “Has there been tension with the National Guard? I mean, NPR spoke with a number of National Guard members from Ohio on the condition of anonymity, and they talked to them just the other day, November 10, and they talked about the deployment to various cities, including D.C. One said, this is not what I signed up for. Three of them declined voluntary deployments, and they were deeply uncomfortable with what they were doing. Has it been tense with the National Guard around?” Tom Manger: “So, it has not been tense as far as the public and the National Guard, but I think it's it really is no secret that many of the national Guard's folks, National Guard folks, don't understand what the purpose of their being there is. I know that I'll have quick interactions with them when I see them occasionally. And, you know, they'll – they'll roll their eyes. They'll – you know, one of them said that he thought it was a waste of time. And so, I – and I think they – they understood at first when they were deployed there with all the other federal resources. But then so many of the federal resources have been pulled back out of D.C. and yet, the National Guard has stayed there. And they're staying at – at first, it was the touristy spots. You saw them down near the museums and the monuments along the mall, and then it seemed like they that they were deployed to many of the downtown subway metro stations. And so, I know that – I don't – I don't feel like there's tension with the public and the National Guard or with their presence. But I do think that that that many of them wonder why they're there, why they're there, what their purpose is and how long they're going to be there. Tur: “Their presence is also under question whether it's legal. Last week, a federal judge ruled the trump administration's deployment of the National Guard in D.C. was unlawful, arguing it lacks authority and is violating the District of Columbia's sovereign powers, under the Home Rule Act. The Trump administration is appealing that order. They filed their appeal, Ken, last night.”

Curtis Houck

58,988 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The intent of Congress, when eliminating the unconstitutional NFA tax, was to end the NFA registry. "When you remove the ability to tax, then the registration must fall. They are inseparably linked." - Rep. Andrew Clyde This is HUGE for our One Big Beautiful Lawsuit. Stay tuned.

The intent of Congress, when eliminating the unconstitutional NFA tax, was to end the NFA registry. "When you remove the ability to tax, then the registration must fall. They are inseparably linked." - Rep. Andrew Clyde This is HUGE for our One Big Beautiful Lawsuit. Stay tuned.

Gun Owners of America

33,627 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Béla Tarr on the censorship of the State and the censorship of the market: "Interviewer: Did you attend a film school? Tarr: I went to film school after my first movie. Because you know at that time everybody needed a diploma. It was communist time, if you wanted to be a filmmaker you had to study in the official film school. But first I made a movie (laughs). Interviewer: Did you suffer from censorship? Tarr: I think censorship is always there. Then it was the censorship of the state and now it’s the censorship of the market. Some differences but . . . Interviewer: Otar Iosseliani, the Georgian director, was telling me the same, that the censorship of the big audience is worse that the censorship of the state, because you only get money for movies made for the big audience. Tarr: Yes, he is right. Because during the communist area you knew you had to make some tricks here and there, like a snake, and if you were very fast and you had some good ideas, you could do it. I really did what I wanted. We had a lot of difficulties, but finally we could make the movies." (Béla Tarr's interview with Eric Schlosser, Bright Lights Film Journal, 2000) P.S: On this day, 26 years ago, "Werckmeister Harmonies" (2000) premiered at the Cinedecouvertes Age D'or Film Festival Brussels, Belgium.

Béla Tarr on the censorship of the State and the censorship of the market: "Interviewer: Did you attend a film school? Tarr: I went to film school after my first movie. Because you know at that time everybody needed a diploma. It was communist time, if you wanted to be a filmmaker you had to study in the official film school. But first I made a movie (laughs). Interviewer: Did you suffer from censorship? Tarr: I think censorship is always there. Then it was the censorship of the state and now it’s the censorship of the market. Some differences but . . . Interviewer: Otar Iosseliani, the Georgian director, was telling me the same, that the censorship of the big audience is worse that the censorship of the state, because you only get money for movies made for the big audience. Tarr: Yes, he is right. Because during the communist area you knew you had to make some tricks here and there, like a snake, and if you were very fast and you had some good ideas, you could do it. I really did what I wanted. We had a lot of difficulties, but finally we could make the movies." (Béla Tarr's interview with Eric Schlosser, Bright Lights Film Journal, 2000) P.S: On this day, 26 years ago, "Werckmeister Harmonies" (2000) premiered at the Cinedecouvertes Age D'or Film Festival Brussels, Belgium.

DepressedBergman

41,701 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat