Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

DOJ's AAG Harmeet Dhillon released this video on the 2nd Amendment less than two months ago. Earlier this week they made one of the, if not the, most aggressive cases ever in court IN FAVOR of keeping SBRs/SBSs/suppressors/etc... on the NFA despite the tax being removed by congress (the... show more

Mrgunsngear

349,988 subscribers

218,318 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Rep Clyde is spot on here 🇺🇸 The DOJ should change their current interpretation of the NFA and remove SBRs, suppressors, SBSs, etc... from the NFA for the reasons stated in this video as well as the fact that "shall not be infringed" means shall not be infringed. #CivilRights #2nd #2a #NFA #SBR

Rep Clyde is spot on here 🇺🇸 The DOJ should change their current interpretation of the NFA and remove SBRs, suppressors, SBSs, etc... from the NFA for the reasons stated in this video as well as the fact that "shall not be infringed" means shall not be infringed. #CivilRights #2nd #2a #NFA #SBR

Mrgunsngear

29,705 views • 8 months ago

Yesterday was the biggest 2nd Amendment legal win in American history 🇺🇸 What does that mean for you, the NFA, SBRs, SBSs, and suppressors ⬇️ #NFA #GOA #2nd #CivilRights #trump #2ndAmendment #silencer #suppressor

Yesterday was the biggest 2nd Amendment legal win in American history 🇺🇸 What does that mean for you, the NFA, SBRs, SBSs, and suppressors ⬇️ #NFA #GOA #2nd #CivilRights #trump #2ndAmendment #silencer #suppressor

Mrgunsngear

51,466 views • 9 days ago

Rep Ben Cline asks AG Pam Bondi why they're STILL enforcing a registration requirement, and the felony criminal penalties that come with it, for NFA items despite the "tax" being removed as of January 1st this year. She responds that it's "pending litigation" which is technically true. However, it's only true because her DOJ hasn't dropped their support of it in court. If they did then the registration and the "pending litigation" would just go away. It really is that simple... #NFA #PamBondi #AG #DOW #silencer #SBR #suppressors #OSHA #safety

Rep Ben Cline asks AG Pam Bondi why they're STILL enforcing a registration requirement, and the felony criminal penalties that come with it, for NFA items despite the "tax" being removed as of January 1st this year. She responds that it's "pending litigation" which is technically true. However, it's only true because her DOJ hasn't dropped their support of it in court. If they did then the registration and the "pending litigation" would just go away. It really is that simple... #NFA #PamBondi #AG #DOW #silencer #SBR #suppressors #OSHA #safety

Mrgunsngear

86,910 views • 6 months ago

The "big beautiful bill" has passed in the Senate without removing suppressors, SBRs, SBSs, etc... from the NFA. Now is the time to call/email your reps and let them know you support Rep Clyde's amendment that puts the HPA & SHORT Act back in the bill 🦅

The "big beautiful bill" has passed in the Senate without removing suppressors, SBRs, SBSs, etc... from the NFA. Now is the time to call/email your reps and let them know you support Rep Clyde's amendment that puts the HPA & SHORT Act back in the bill 🦅

Mrgunsngear

39,348 views • 1 year ago

The intent of Congress, when eliminating the unconstitutional NFA tax, was to end the NFA registry. "When you remove the ability to tax, then the registration must fall. They are inseparably linked." - Rep. Andrew Clyde This is HUGE for our One Big Beautiful Lawsuit. Stay tuned.

The intent of Congress, when eliminating the unconstitutional NFA tax, was to end the NFA registry. "When you remove the ability to tax, then the registration must fall. They are inseparably linked." - Rep. Andrew Clyde This is HUGE for our One Big Beautiful Lawsuit. Stay tuned.

Gun Owners of America

33,627 views • 9 months ago

🚨 BIG WIN for the Second Amendment. A federal judge just ruled that because Congress zeroed out the NFA tax in the Big Beautiful Bill, the federal registration and approval process for suppressors and other NFA items no longer has a legal basis. No more tax stamp. No more waiting on ATF approval for transfers. Dealers are still waiting on clear guidance, and the government has time to appeal, but the principle is clear: When the tax goes away, the regulatory scheme that depended on it collapses. Gun owners just got a major victory.

🚨 BIG WIN for the Second Amendment. A federal judge just ruled that because Congress zeroed out the NFA tax in the Big Beautiful Bill, the federal registration and approval process for suppressors and other NFA items no longer has a legal basis. No more tax stamp. No more waiting on ATF approval for transfers. Dealers are still waiting on clear guidance, and the government has time to appeal, but the principle is clear: When the tax goes away, the regulatory scheme that depended on it collapses. Gun owners just got a major victory.

Gunther Eagleman™

43,116 views • 6 hours ago

If the NFA registry no longer records the payment of a tax on $0 taxed firearms, then it exists solely to register the firearms themselves. This directly conflicts with the Firearm Owners’ Protection Act. END NFA REGISTRATION.

If the NFA registry no longer records the payment of a tax on $0 taxed firearms, then it exists solely to register the firearms themselves. This directly conflicts with the Firearm Owners’ Protection Act. END NFA REGISTRATION.

Rep. Andrew Clyde

52,798 views • 2 months ago

We sit down with an actual 2nd Amendment attorney, Adam from the Second Amendment Foundation, to try and figure out what is currently happening with the National Firearms Act, suppressors, SBRs, etc... ⬇️ #SAF #2ndAmendment #silencer #suppressor #NFA #AR15

We sit down with an actual 2nd Amendment attorney, Adam from the Second Amendment Foundation, to try and figure out what is currently happening with the National Firearms Act, suppressors, SBRs, etc... ⬇️ #SAF #2ndAmendment #silencer #suppressor #NFA #AR15

Mrgunsngear

41,089 views • 8 days ago

The first tax Tinubu introduced as soon as he got into office was the Tax of inflation —which is why you got poorer. I made a video about the tax of inflation earlier this year. Enjoy and share.

The first tax Tinubu introduced as soon as he got into office was the Tax of inflation —which is why you got poorer. I made a video about the tax of inflation earlier this year. Enjoy and share.

Biggest Mack

15,938 views • 11 months ago

The Hearing Protection Act and the SHORT Act are both being held up by Republicans in the House Ways And Means Committee. Info below in the comments on how you can contact them to help get these bills which would remove suppressors, SBRs, and short barreled shotguns from the NFA 🇺🇸 #NFA #2ndAmendment #suppressors #silencers #SBR #SBS

The Hearing Protection Act and the SHORT Act are both being held up by Republicans in the House Ways And Means Committee. Info below in the comments on how you can contact them to help get these bills which would remove suppressors, SBRs, and short barreled shotguns from the NFA 🇺🇸 #NFA #2ndAmendment #suppressors #silencers #SBR #SBS

Mrgunsngear

65,093 views • 1 year ago

This is Mark Carney “cancelling” the capital gains “tax hike” that Justin Trudeau proposed while Mark Carney was advising him behind the scenes. Here is a video of Justin explaining that tax hike less than one year ago. If you vote Liberal, you are an idiot with the memory of a goldfish.

This is Mark Carney “cancelling” the capital gains “tax hike” that Justin Trudeau proposed while Mark Carney was advising him behind the scenes. Here is a video of Justin explaining that tax hike less than one year ago. If you vote Liberal, you are an idiot with the memory of a goldfish.

Viva Frei

136,587 views • 1 year ago

Justice Gorsuch is right here. When you read the 2nd Amendment, then apply the Heller & Bruen standards which are correct legal precedents, there's no way someone who uses a substance (whatever it may be) from time to time should be prohibited from defending themselves how they see fit in America. Even KBJ made a similar point earlier today - it's that obvious... #2nd #2a #CivilRights #SCOTUS #Hemani #Gorsuch

Justice Gorsuch is right here. When you read the 2nd Amendment, then apply the Heller & Bruen standards which are correct legal precedents, there's no way someone who uses a substance (whatever it may be) from time to time should be prohibited from defending themselves how they see fit in America. Even KBJ made a similar point earlier today - it's that obvious... #2nd #2a #CivilRights #SCOTUS #Hemani #Gorsuch

Mrgunsngear

91,914 views • 5 months ago

Brandon Herrera Just Made HISTORY After Judge STRUCK DOWN Unconstitutional National Firearms Act Restrictions "If the only reason the NFA was constitutional was because you weren't registering the firearms, you were instead registering the payment of the tax. Now that the tax is zero, what the hell are you registering? And so a federal judge in the state of Texas agreed with this and struck it down" "They had seven days to appeal, they did not." "At midnight of the seventh day, we went to silencer shop headquarters with GOA and I became the first transferee of two suppressors in 92 years." Huge win for the Second Amendment, Brandon Herrera

Brandon Herrera Just Made HISTORY After Judge STRUCK DOWN Unconstitutional National Firearms Act Restrictions "If the only reason the NFA was constitutional was because you weren't registering the firearms, you were instead registering the payment of the tax. Now that the tax is zero, what the hell are you registering? And so a federal judge in the state of Texas agreed with this and struck it down" "They had seven days to appeal, they did not." "At midnight of the seventh day, we went to silencer shop headquarters with GOA and I became the first transferee of two suppressors in 92 years." Huge win for the Second Amendment, Brandon Herrera

Benny Johnson

135,653 views • 5 days ago

Why are suppressors — a basic safety tool — so heavily regulated? The unconstitutional National Firearms Act of 1934 implemented burdensome regulations and a $200 tax on suppressors. Over 90 years later, that tax still exists. It was never about safety — it was about control. Last night, Ways and Means Committee passed my provision to cut that tax to $0. This is step one in tearing down the unconstitutional NFA. We’re just getting started.

Why are suppressors — a basic safety tool — so heavily regulated? The unconstitutional National Firearms Act of 1934 implemented burdensome regulations and a $200 tax on suppressors. Over 90 years later, that tax still exists. It was never about safety — it was about control. Last night, Ways and Means Committee passed my provision to cut that tax to $0. This is step one in tearing down the unconstitutional NFA. We’re just getting started.

Rep. David Kustoff

92,817 views • 1 year ago

Tariffs are taxes. The power to tax is a power vested in Congress, not the President, that’s rooted in the history and founding of this nation dating back to the revolution. More on Supreme Court arguments in the cases challenging Trump’s illegal tariffs on MeidasTouch's Legal AF:

Tariffs are taxes. The power to tax is a power vested in Congress, not the President, that’s rooted in the history and founding of this nation dating back to the revolution. More on Supreme Court arguments in the cases challenging Trump’s illegal tariffs on MeidasTouch's Legal AF:

Rob Bonta

69,179 views • 9 months ago

I applaud AG Harmeet Dhillon, the head of DOJ's Civil Rights Division, for standing up against the unconstitutional laws that will (99.9999% chance) go into "law" this summer. However, lawsuits simply aren't enough for these tyrants. They don't care that they'll have to use Virginia state tax dollars to fight the federal government in court. They'll just forcibly steal more taxes from Virginians until the legal process is over and the tyrants behind these "laws" will not be held personally accountable for what they're doing which is textbook criminal "deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242)." Governor Spanberger, and others like her, need to be arrested and criminally tried for what they're doing to their citizens. They are the very "domestic enemies" our founders warned against. If a state governor just re-instituted slavery, violating the 13th Amendment, they'd be arrested by the feds. The 2nd Amendment *should* be no different but somehow it's treated differently. #virginia #CivilRights #richmond #crime #2nd #spanberger #2a #norfolk

I applaud AG Harmeet Dhillon, the head of DOJ's Civil Rights Division, for standing up against the unconstitutional laws that will (99.9999% chance) go into "law" this summer. However, lawsuits simply aren't enough for these tyrants. They don't care that they'll have to use Virginia state tax dollars to fight the federal government in court. They'll just forcibly steal more taxes from Virginians until the legal process is over and the tyrants behind these "laws" will not be held personally accountable for what they're doing which is textbook criminal "deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242)." Governor Spanberger, and others like her, need to be arrested and criminally tried for what they're doing to their citizens. They are the very "domestic enemies" our founders warned against. If a state governor just re-instituted slavery, violating the 13th Amendment, they'd be arrested by the feds. The 2nd Amendment should be no different but somehow it's treated differently. #virginia #CivilRights #richmond #crime #2nd #spanberger #2a #norfolk

Mrgunsngear

36,837 views • 4 months ago

If Australia wants to start heading in the right direction then reforming our tax system has to be of the highest priority. Our tax base is severely eroded because our tax act allows foreign companies to pay less tax than Australian companies making all Australians poorer. What's so frustrating about all of this is that Treasury and the ATO are aware of this issue and does nothing about it, yet are more than happy to increase taxes on Australians. It beggars belief for example that the ATO has not updated our tax treaty with Ireland since 1983 as billions of dollars are being sent there by Multinationals to avoid paying tax in Australia. If you want to back a party that can actually fix this problem without needing the assistance of the bureaucracy then please sign up today at

If Australia wants to start heading in the right direction then reforming our tax system has to be of the highest priority. Our tax base is severely eroded because our tax act allows foreign companies to pay less tax than Australian companies making all Australians poorer. What's so frustrating about all of this is that Treasury and the ATO are aware of this issue and does nothing about it, yet are more than happy to increase taxes on Australians. It beggars belief for example that the ATO has not updated our tax treaty with Ireland since 1983 as billions of dollars are being sent there by Multinationals to avoid paying tax in Australia. If you want to back a party that can actually fix this problem without needing the assistance of the bureaucracy then please sign up today at

Gerard Rennick

26,485 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BREAKING: In a TERRIFYING development for the left, President Trump just confirmed a whopping 20% PERCENT will be returned to American taxpayers because of his new policies in some cases Sec. Scott Bessent predicted this — it's about to be the largest tax refund season EVER! 🇺🇸 "Tax Refunds this year, because of “THE GREAT BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL,” are substantially greater than ever before. In some cases, estimates are that over 20% will be returned to the Taxpayer." "So, when you get your Tax Refund, think about what a wonderful President you have — NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR OUR GREAT SENIORS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, INTEREST DEDUCTIONS ON CAR LOANS, AND MUCH MORE. Don’t spend all of this money in one place! President DJT" Good news for the MIDTERMS.

🚨 BREAKING: In a TERRIFYING development for the left, President Trump just confirmed a whopping 20% PERCENT will be returned to American taxpayers because of his new policies in some cases Sec. Scott Bessent predicted this — it's about to be the largest tax refund season EVER! 🇺🇸 "Tax Refunds this year, because of “THE GREAT BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL,” are substantially greater than ever before. In some cases, estimates are that over 20% will be returned to the Taxpayer." "So, when you get your Tax Refund, think about what a wonderful President you have — NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR OUR GREAT SENIORS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, INTEREST DEDUCTIONS ON CAR LOANS, AND MUCH MORE. Don’t spend all of this money in one place! President DJT" Good news for the MIDTERMS.

Eric Daugherty

812,297 views • 6 months ago

President Trump called for a 1 year in prison if someone burns the American flag earlier today at Fort Bragg, NC. *in almost every circumstance* where an American flag is burned in protest multiple crimes are already being committed but the people who burn the flag are almost never prosecuted for those crimes. That could likely be fixed in many cases with the DOJ if they were directed to prosecute such cases. This would also be a clear violation of the 1st Amendment unless he's calling for a Constitutional amendment and maybe he is. But, the 2nd, 4th, 10th, & 14th amendments (probably more but those jump to the front of my mind while typing this) have already been turned into second class rights that are regularly trampled on by the federal government. We don't need to add the 1st amendment to that list IMO. I obviously don't like to see our flag be burned but I also believe the 1st amendment is pretty clear on this.

President Trump called for a 1 year in prison if someone burns the American flag earlier today at Fort Bragg, NC. in almost every circumstance where an American flag is burned in protest multiple crimes are already being committed but the people who burn the flag are almost never prosecuted for those crimes. That could likely be fixed in many cases with the DOJ if they were directed to prosecute such cases. This would also be a clear violation of the 1st Amendment unless he's calling for a Constitutional amendment and maybe he is. But, the 2nd, 4th, 10th, & 14th amendments (probably more but those jump to the front of my mind while typing this) have already been turned into second class rights that are regularly trampled on by the federal government. We don't need to add the 1st amendment to that list IMO. I obviously don't like to see our flag be burned but I also believe the 1st amendment is pretty clear on this.

Mrgunsngear

21,324 views • 1 year ago