Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

BREAKING: A furious Mayor Frey explodes at the irony that we'd have to question whether Trump's admin would abide by a lawful court order. "The answer BETTER be yes... the answer has to be yes if you are a patriot!" This hits hard.

Really American 🇺🇸

712,239 subscribers

1,543,484 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Q: They defied a search warrant this morning. Do you think they'll abide by a federal court order? FREY: Everybody listen to that question. The question is 'will this administration abide by a court order.' These are the underpinnings of our democracy and Constitution. The answer better be yes.

Q: They defied a search warrant this morning. Do you think they'll abide by a federal court order? FREY: Everybody listen to that question. The question is 'will this administration abide by a court order.' These are the underpinnings of our democracy and Constitution. The answer better be yes.

Aaron Rupar

255,296 views • 5 months ago

Sen. Adam Schiff: "You were asked whether you consulted with career ethics lawyers, as you promised you would do during your nomination hearing, when you approved the president recovering a $400 million gift from the Qataris. You refused to answer that question. You were asked what role you played in asking that Trump's name be flagged in any of the Epstein documents...You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether Tom Homan kept the $50,000 bribe money. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan paid taxes on the $50,000 bribe. You refused to answer that question. You were asked if prosecutors found insufficient evidence to charge James Comey. You refused to answer that question. You were asked how military strikes on boats in the Caribbean are legal. You refused to answer that question. You were asked if you discussed indicting James Comey with the president. You refused to answer that question...You were asked whether you support a restoration fund for violent insurrectionists who attacked the Capitol. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you were firing career prosecutors just because they worked on January 6 investigations. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you believe government officials like immigration officials have to abide by court. You refused to answer that question."

Sen. Adam Schiff: "You were asked whether you consulted with career ethics lawyers, as you promised you would do during your nomination hearing, when you approved the president recovering a $400 million gift from the Qataris. You refused to answer that question. You were asked what role you played in asking that Trump's name be flagged in any of the Epstein documents...You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether Tom Homan kept the $50,000 bribe money. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan paid taxes on the $50,000 bribe. You refused to answer that question. You were asked if prosecutors found insufficient evidence to charge James Comey. You refused to answer that question. You were asked how military strikes on boats in the Caribbean are legal. You refused to answer that question. You were asked if you discussed indicting James Comey with the president. You refused to answer that question...You were asked whether you support a restoration fund for violent insurrectionists who attacked the Capitol. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you were firing career prosecutors just because they worked on January 6 investigations. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you believe government officials like immigration officials have to abide by court. You refused to answer that question."

The Bulwark

244,781 views • 9 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | In the Lok Sabha, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh says, "... Few members of the Opposition have been asking how many of our aircraft were shot down? I feel their question does not adequately represent our national sentiments. They have not asked us how many enemy aircraft our Armed Forces shot down. If they must ask a question, it should be whether India destroyed terrorist bases, and the answer to that is, yes... If you have a question to ask, it should be whether the Operation Sindoor was a success. The answer is yes. Were terror heads destroyed? Yes. If you have a question to ask, ask this: Were any of our brave soldiers harmed in this operation? The answer is, no, none of our soldiers were harmed..."

#WATCH | Delhi | In the Lok Sabha, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh says, "... Few members of the Opposition have been asking how many of our aircraft were shot down? I feel their question does not adequately represent our national sentiments. They have not asked us how many enemy aircraft our Armed Forces shot down. If they must ask a question, it should be whether India destroyed terrorist bases, and the answer to that is, yes... If you have a question to ask, it should be whether the Operation Sindoor was a success. The answer is yes. Were terror heads destroyed? Yes. If you have a question to ask, ask this: Were any of our brave soldiers harmed in this operation? The answer is, no, none of our soldiers were harmed..."

ANI

79,763 views • 11 months ago

Schiff: I think it's valuable that the American people get a sense of what you have refused to answer today. So these are just some of the questions you refuse to answer, but or have answered with personal attacks on members of this committee. You were asked whether you consulted with career ethics lawyers, as you promised you would do during your nomination hearing. When you approved the president receiving a $400 million gift from the qataris, you refused to answer that question. You were asked who or what role you may have played, or who played the role in asking the trump's name be flagged in any of the Epstein documents gathered by the FBI? You refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan kept the $50,000 bribe money. You refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan paid taxes on the $50,000 bribe money. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, did career prosecutors find insufficient evidence to charge James Comey. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, how are military strikes on these boats in the caribbean legal. And you refuse to even answer that question. You are asked, excuse me, excuse me? You are asked, did you discuss indicting James Comey with the president. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, did you approve the firing of antitrust lawyers who disagreed with the Hewlett Packard merger. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you support a restoration fund for violent insurrections, insurrections to attack the capitol on January 6th. Refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether you were firing career professionals, career prosecutors just because they worked on January 6th. Question January 6th investigations. You refuse to answer that question. You were asked by my colleague whether you believe government officials, like immigration officials, have to abide by court orders. You wouldn't answer that question

Schiff: I think it's valuable that the American people get a sense of what you have refused to answer today. So these are just some of the questions you refuse to answer, but or have answered with personal attacks on members of this committee. You were asked whether you consulted with career ethics lawyers, as you promised you would do during your nomination hearing. When you approved the president receiving a $400 million gift from the qataris, you refused to answer that question. You were asked who or what role you may have played, or who played the role in asking the trump's name be flagged in any of the Epstein documents gathered by the FBI? You refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan kept the $50,000 bribe money. You refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan paid taxes on the $50,000 bribe money. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, did career prosecutors find insufficient evidence to charge James Comey. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, how are military strikes on these boats in the caribbean legal. And you refuse to even answer that question. You are asked, excuse me, excuse me? You are asked, did you discuss indicting James Comey with the president. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, did you approve the firing of antitrust lawyers who disagreed with the Hewlett Packard merger. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you support a restoration fund for violent insurrections, insurrections to attack the capitol on January 6th. Refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether you were firing career professionals, career prosecutors just because they worked on January 6th. Question January 6th investigations. You refuse to answer that question. You were asked by my colleague whether you believe government officials, like immigration officials, have to abide by court orders. You wouldn't answer that question

Acyn

1,117,864 views • 9 months ago

A bespectacled Rosie seems to counsel the new PM Carney to give non-answers, word salad or obfuscate if he doesn't want to answer a question from the opposition "If I would say one thing about the current Prime Minister is if you're not going to answer the question, sometimes you have to give a little something more or answer a question that you would rather answer is another way they go about it in question, period, in order to give the opposition something." "We'll see whether we get there"

A bespectacled Rosie seems to counsel the new PM Carney to give non-answers, word salad or obfuscate if he doesn't want to answer a question from the opposition "If I would say one thing about the current Prime Minister is if you're not going to answer the question, sometimes you have to give a little something more or answer a question that you would rather answer is another way they go about it in question, period, in order to give the opposition something." "We'll see whether we get there"

cbcwatcher

52,135 views • 1 year ago

hailey said now girl let’s be serious you know the answer to that question… well yes!

hailey said now girl let’s be serious you know the answer to that question… well yes!

۟

249,812 views • 8 months ago

Durbin: Are you prepared to say today that Donald Trump lost to Joe Biden in 2020? Bondi: *gives long non-answer* Durbin: That question deserved a yes or no. The length of your answer indicates that you weren't prepared to answer yes.

Durbin: Are you prepared to say today that Donald Trump lost to Joe Biden in 2020? Bondi: gives long non-answer Durbin: That question deserved a yes or no. The length of your answer indicates that you weren't prepared to answer yes.

FactPost

449,144 views • 1 year ago

⚡ RAW VIDEO: “Answer as a Man” — Kelly Confronts Mayor Johnson ⚡ At today’s presser, I asked Mayor Johnson what real Chicagoans are asking: how can you call law enforcement “a sickness” while you hide behind 150 sworn CPD officers? And if you and your wife Stacey were ever attacked — shot at, rammed by a protester vehicle — would you order your police detail to stand down? He really didn't like that question. Then I asked him a question that infuriated him and his staff and they tried to shut me down: Last month, a Nicaraguan illegal alien bashed a Chicago woman’s head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. So I asked Mayor Johnson: if that victim had been your wife Stacey, would you want ICE to deport that rapist? Yes or no? His answer? He wouldn’t say yes. So I said it for him: “No? OK, that’s the answer. That’s the answer for real Chicagoans.” That's not an answer a real man or a real mayor would give - that's the opinion of this reporter.

⚡ RAW VIDEO: “Answer as a Man” — Kelly Confronts Mayor Johnson ⚡ At today’s presser, I asked Mayor Johnson what real Chicagoans are asking: how can you call law enforcement “a sickness” while you hide behind 150 sworn CPD officers? And if you and your wife Stacey were ever attacked — shot at, rammed by a protester vehicle — would you order your police detail to stand down? He really didn't like that question. Then I asked him a question that infuriated him and his staff and they tried to shut me down: Last month, a Nicaraguan illegal alien bashed a Chicago woman’s head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. So I asked Mayor Johnson: if that victim had been your wife Stacey, would you want ICE to deport that rapist? Yes or no? His answer? He wouldn’t say yes. So I said it for him: “No? OK, that’s the answer. That’s the answer for real Chicagoans.” That's not an answer a real man or a real mayor would give - that's the opinion of this reporter.

Reporter William J. Kelly #thatreporter

995,994 views • 9 months ago

Spike asks Sixers fans if they're ready to "surrender the organization" to LeBron James. "If the question was simply do you want a player of LeBron James' skillset on the team the answer would be yes a million times yes. But that's not how it works because not only is it LeBron's team on the court it's his team off the court too."

Spike asks Sixers fans if they're ready to "surrender the organization" to LeBron James. "If the question was simply do you want a player of LeBron James' skillset on the team the answer would be yes a million times yes. But that's not how it works because not only is it LeBron's team on the court it's his team off the court too."

SPORTSRADIO 94WIP

32,134 views • 3 days ago

Pete Hegseth's REFUSAL to answer whether spousal abuse is disqualifying sure hits different as that new affidavit accusing him of abuse landed today. I can answer the question easily. The answer is YES, it's disqualifying.

Pete Hegseth's REFUSAL to answer whether spousal abuse is disqualifying sure hits different as that new affidavit accusing him of abuse landed today. I can answer the question easily. The answer is YES, it's disqualifying.

BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️

63,444 views • 1 year ago

Question : Can gay people be Christians? Can alcoholics? Can you still be a Christian while having an affair? If the answer is no to the first but yes to the others, why? Bonus points if you use scripture.

Question : Can gay people be Christians? Can alcoholics? Can you still be a Christian while having an affair? If the answer is no to the first but yes to the others, why? Bonus points if you use scripture.

Iliftfordoughnuts

273,900 views • 10 months ago

You know the old adage that the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t know. In this case, the devil that we do know is so utterly satanic that the answer would have to be yes. Even a chaotic Iran may be safer than a regime committed to destroying Israel and targeting U.S. officials—including myself—for assassination.

You know the old adage that the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t know. In this case, the devil that we do know is so utterly satanic that the answer would have to be yes. Even a chaotic Iran may be safer than a regime committed to destroying Israel and targeting U.S. officials—including myself—for assassination.

Michael Oren

24,713 views • 1 year ago

Reporter: On Iran, how confident are you that there will be a signing this weekend? Trump: It will be soon. Reporter: Has the supreme leader approved the deal? Trump: I understand the answer is yes. Reporter: And you will be lifting the blockade? Trump: Yes.

Reporter: On Iran, how confident are you that there will be a signing this weekend? Trump: It will be soon. Reporter: Has the supreme leader approved the deal? Trump: I understand the answer is yes. Reporter: And you will be lifting the blockade? Trump: Yes.

Acyn

77,086 views • 1 month ago

#BREAKING: Psaki opener: “Today many Americans, maybe a lot of you watching right now, are understandably wondering why he did this [#Maduro capture], and you will not be shocked to learn that the Trump administration does NOT have a clear answer for that question, and you will also not be shocked to learn that they DON’T have a clear answer on the incredibly important question of what comes next…”🤦‍♀️

#BREAKING: Psaki opener: “Today many Americans, maybe a lot of you watching right now, are understandably wondering why he did this [#Maduro capture], and you will not be shocked to learn that the Trump administration does NOT have a clear answer for that question, and you will also not be shocked to learn that they DON’T have a clear answer on the incredibly important question of what comes next…”🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

86,134 views • 6 months ago

Hunter Biden should be held in contempt. There was a lawful Congressional subpoena. He did not answer the subpoena. He flaunted his refusal to answer the subpoena. ANY OTHER AMERICAN would be held in contempt by Congress. This is DEMOCRAT PRIVILEGE of the highest order.

Hunter Biden should be held in contempt. There was a lawful Congressional subpoena. He did not answer the subpoena. He flaunted his refusal to answer the subpoena. ANY OTHER AMERICAN would be held in contempt by Congress. This is DEMOCRAT PRIVILEGE of the highest order.

Congressman Byron Donalds

403,131 views • 2 years ago

If you are going to ask a question, you could at least show some interest in the answer. The Gregg's order an wait @kirstenoswald

If you are going to ask a question, you could at least show some interest in the answer. The Gregg's order an wait @kirstenoswald

Bob's Country Bunker

59,694 views • 3 years ago

Do you want to be an IGN host? If the answer is yes, your time has come. Apply here:

Do you want to be an IGN host? If the answer is yes, your time has come. Apply here:

IGN

642,546 views • 5 months ago