Pete Hegseth's REFUSAL to answer whether spousal abuse is disqualifying sure hits different as that new affidavit accusing him of abuse landed today. I can answer the question easily. The answer is YES, it's disqualifying.

Abuse of women would be pretty on brand for the Trump administration

I mean, it's such a low, low bar. It's right there with "Would you let someone play with your kids if you knew they shot puppies in the face?" Or worse.

Flash Shelton, an anti-squatting activist, reveals how squatters in California exploit tenant laws, blurring the lines between tenant rights and unlawful occupation. He shares strategies for dealing with squatters and the challenges homeowners face in reclaiming their properties.

I've tried to reply in agreement with you, but my anti Hegseth/Trump remarks fail to send. Trying this just to see if it will

I see it, Molly.

Get a life dude. Bidens secretary of defense went into surgery without even telling the president. You didn't say sh*t though dis you?

He was called to account for it, by Congress. But he didn't beat his wife, did he? He doesn't drink on the job, does he? He's fucking QUALIFIED. Look, DEMs approved Marco Rubio unanimously, because he's qualified. HUGE position. Pick someone who doesn't beat his wife. How hard could it be?

Frankly I regret this is only going to endear him even further to Republicans.

his wife debunked this 🤣 yall wonder why yalls sorry asses lost

That's not the question. The question is, if he's completely INNOCENT of the accusation, why can't he say that it's disqualifying if ANYONE ELSE is guilty of spousal abuse? It's the easiest answer to a question if you're innocent.

Does child abuse disqualify a Democrat propagandist from cashing that check?