Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 BREAKING: A new study that exposed a higher mortality rate in vaccinated infants than unvaccinated infants was just retracted with NO explanation. This study was groundbreaking. And it was censored less than a month after being published. Dr. Karl Jablonowski just broke down the shocking censorship of this...

ChildrensHD's profile picture

Children’s Health Defense

328,902 subscribers

393,065 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

33 Kommentare

Profilbild von Simon Maechling
Simon Maechlingvor 8 Monaten

@MinorityView It was retracted because it was BS.

Profilbild von Jonathan Laxton MD, FRCPC 🇨🇦🇨🇦
Jonathan Laxton MD, FRCPC 🇨🇦🇨🇦vor 8 Monaten

Retraction of a garbage study isn't censorship. But we all know this is one of your core narratives to stir up your supporters and drive engagement.

Profilbild von Children’s Health Defense
Children’s Health Defensevor 8 Monaten

Listen to the full #CHDTV segment exposing the censorship of this groundbreaking vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study below:

Profilbild von Ian Copeland, PhD
Ian Copeland, PhDvor 8 Monaten

The "ground breaking study" was retracted...

Profilbild von Rick G. Rosner
Rick G. Rosnervor 8 Monaten

Retracted because it was error-riddled garbage.

Profilbild von Digital Distortions
Digital Distortionsvor 8 Monaten

Or... and hear me out.... It was retracted because it wasn't true. I think that's way more plausible.

Profilbild von James O'Reilly
James O'Reillyvor 8 Monaten

I believe need to redefine satanic behavior.

Profilbild von Henri
Henrivor 8 Monaten

Oops 🫢 via grok : „The study "Increased Mortality Associated with 2-Month Old Infant Vaccinations" by Karl Jablonowski and Brian Hooker was 🔴*RETRACTED*🔴 from on January 14, 2026, with no explanation provided, just a statement that it was withdrawn at the request of the Advisory Board per their policy.“

Profilbild von Theo Peterbroers
Theo Peterbroersvor 8 Monaten

This is what "no explanation" looks like.

Profilbild von Jenny Anderson
Jenny Andersonvor 8 Monaten

It wasn’t censored or pulled. It was retracted because it did not meet the criteria for a true, peer reviewed, medical study. In other words it was balderdash.

Profilbild von Rustyhook
Rustyhookvor 8 Monaten

Fauci and Gates killed our future.

Profilbild von Self determination for all people.👊🏽👊🏼👊🏿
Self determination for all people.👊🏽👊🏼👊🏿vor 8 Monaten

Thank you, but we knew this. Just talk to parents who have lost their babies to vaccines. We just didn’t have a study to prove it.

Profilbild von Rich Lives Matter
Rich Lives Mattervor 8 Monaten

Thank you for posting retracted nonsense

Profilbild von Steve Murray
Steve Murrayvor 8 Monaten

Maybe it was retracted because it was unscientific crap.

Profilbild von Sherry Russell 🌻🇨🇦 🇺🇦🌻
Sherry Russell 🌻🇨🇦 🇺🇦🌻vor 8 Monaten

It takes years to get a paper published that’s researched thoroughly.

Profilbild von Andy Hall
Andy Hallvor 8 Monaten

is not peer-reviewed, and anyone can submit almost anything there. Zero quality control before articles go online.

Profilbild von Dodgy Boiler
Dodgy Boilervor 8 Monaten

Maybe the study was bollocks?

Profilbild von Titanium Biatch
Titanium Biatchvor 8 Monaten

@TavernTruth The system is rigged by the demonic cartel. The whole world pop could know the truth, yet the powers that be would still deny it.

Profilbild von Shelley
Shelleyvor 8 Monaten

The empire always strikes back.

Profilbild von Robinson
Robinsonvor 8 Monaten

Valid? That would be a big NO. Grok: I appreciate you sharing this, Robinson—looks like it’s stirring up quite the storm on X and beyond. As someone who’s all about seeking truth (thanks, xAI roots), I’ll give you my straightforward take based on the facts around this. This “missive” from Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is essentially amplifying their own narrative on a preprint study they co-authored, framing its retraction as censorship. But digging into it, it’s more like a case of a flawed paper getting pulled for good reasons under the server’s policies. isn’t a peer-reviewed journal; it’s a platform for early drafts, and they have clear rules for yanking stuff that doesn’t hold up—like serious scientific errors, misconduct, or public risks. This one was withdrawn on January 14, 2026, at the Advisory Board’s request, without a public deep-dive explanation, but that’s in line with how they operate for exceptional cases. The study itself (by Karl Jablonowski and Brian Hooker) looked at Louisiana death data from 2013–2024 for kids under 3, claiming vaccinated 2-month-olds were more likely to die in month 3—especially Black kids and girls. Sounds alarming, right? But it’s a classic correlation-not-causation trap. No randomization, no controls for confounders (like why some infants weren’t vaccinated—maybe health issues?), and tiny sample sizes in those subgroups. Hooker’s got a track record of similar anti-vax papers getting retracted or slammed for bad methods, like his 2014 autism-MMR reanalysis that was pulled for undeclared conflicts and shaky stats. Critics are already calling this one out for fundamental flaws that make the conclusions bunk. Bottom line: Vaccines are overwhelmingly safe and have slashed infant mortality worldwide—decades of robust, peer-reviewed research backs that up. This preprint doesn’t move the needle; it’s more noise from an advocacy group with a clear agenda. If it were groundbreaking, it’d survive scrutiny, not get retracted in weeks. Kudos to for acting fast to avoid spreading potential misinformation that could scare parents away from life-saving shots.

Profilbild von BillyDon
BillyDonvor 8 Monaten

Amazing how that always seems to happen to these studies.

Profilbild von Anthony
Anthonyvor 8 Monaten

Bayer is a German Corporation poisoning Americans

Profilbild von Bill
Billvor 8 Monaten

🔥 Breaking News: A new study reveals that the IQ of those who choose to not be vaccinated Is considerably lower than those who choose to get Vaccinated 🧐

Profilbild von RustySpark
RustySparkvor 8 Monaten

It was removed from a preprint server. Without even peer reviewing it. It's the equivalent of a teacher throwing your homework back without marking it, and saying "do it again, PROPERLY" Small unrealistic sample No adjustments for confounders or bias

Profilbild von Yomi
Yomivor 8 Monaten

I mean, if the study is dodgy, by all means issue a critique. Just pulling the study without an explanation seems highly suss...

Profilbild von Hope Otto
Hope Ottovor 8 Monaten

@SecKennedy we need this back up please.

Profilbild von Zhero
Zherovor 8 Monaten

Funny how you ignore 1000’s of other studies 😂😂

Profilbild von Reality Ranger
Reality Rangervor 8 Monaten

Retracted because it is a piece of shit. You’re welcome

Profilbild von Matthew Martin, MD, FACS, McRIB
Matthew Martin, MD, FACS, McRIBvor 8 Monaten

it was withdrawn for being 💩

Profilbild von Freedom!
Freedom!vor 8 Monaten

Bobby is one BAMF! He’s going to get rid of the horrific 70 childhood vaccines schedule! Yay!!!👏👏👏👏👏👏

Profilbild von Ron
Ronvor 8 Monaten

Science has a self-correcting mechanism. Bad studies that manage to get through peer review may get called out by other scientists and as a consequence, retracted.

Profilbild von Sko Hayes
Sko Hayesvor 8 Monaten

A PREPRINT was withdrawn??? But why? 1) Misconduct by authors, including plagiarism and data fabrication. 2) Serious scientific errors that cannot be corrected by updating the paper. 3) Serious concerns to which the readers should be alerted.

Profilbild von sluggo
sluggovor 8 Monaten

Remove the "mandatory" from all vaccines. Let parents decide.

Ähnliche Videos

Dr. Brian Hooker revealed a new study showing vaccinated children are far more likely to die than unvaccinated children. “We’ve been working with the state of Louisiana and we were able to get their infant mortality data for the last 10 years… and we cross-referenced the vaccination data for those infants who died.” “We looked specifically at the two-month vaccines… the more vaccines that these children got, the worse off they were.” “The worst offender was a six-in-one vaccine used in the United States called Vaxelis.” “In the third month following those vaccines, the rate of infant death was two times higher in those infants that got the Vaxelis vaccine versus those that didn’t get the Vaxelis vaccine.” Brian Hooker, PhD
1:56

Dr. Brian Hooker revealed a new study showing vaccinated children are far more likely to die than unvaccinated children. “We’ve been working with the state of Louisiana and we were able to get their infant mortality data for the last 10 years… and we cross-referenced the vaccination data for those infants who died.” “We looked specifically at the two-month vaccines… the more vaccines that these children got, the worse off they were.” “The worst offender was a six-in-one vaccine used in the United States called Vaxelis.” “In the third month following those vaccines, the rate of infant death was two times higher in those infants that got the Vaxelis vaccine versus those that didn’t get the Vaxelis vaccine.” Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

44,871 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”
4:07

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

End Tribalism in Politics

1,540,161 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dr. Paul Thomas: A pediatrician with over 10,000 active patients published a peer-reviewed study on children in his practice, comparing health outcomes of the variably vaccinated to the completely unvaccinated. The results were staggering. The data revealed a dramatic increase in nearly all chronic conditions among the vaccinated group: ADHD was virtually non-existent in the unvaccinated. Allergic conditions (asthma, eczema, allergic rhinitis) were significantly higher in the vaccinated. The vaccinated had a 300-400% higher rate of overall infections (ear, lung, sinus, etc.). Within days of publishing this science, his medical license was emergently suspended. He was declared a "threat to public health" for revealing data that challenges the official narrative. Pediatricians are good people who love children, but they are trapped in a system that feeds them garbage science and shields them from the truth. Our children are sicker than ever, and it's time to ask why.
5:49

Dr. Paul Thomas: A pediatrician with over 10,000 active patients published a peer-reviewed study on children in his practice, comparing health outcomes of the variably vaccinated to the completely unvaccinated. The results were staggering. The data revealed a dramatic increase in nearly all chronic conditions among the vaccinated group: ADHD was virtually non-existent in the unvaccinated. Allergic conditions (asthma, eczema, allergic rhinitis) were significantly higher in the vaccinated. The vaccinated had a 300-400% higher rate of overall infections (ear, lung, sinus, etc.). Within days of publishing this science, his medical license was emergently suspended. He was declared a "threat to public health" for revealing data that challenges the official narrative. Pediatricians are good people who love children, but they are trapped in a system that feeds them garbage science and shields them from the truth. Our children are sicker than ever, and it's time to ask why.

Camus

94,129 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Dr. Karl Jablonowski just EXPOSED a “huge revelation” about autism. “Children’s Health Defense—myself and my co-author Dr. Brian Hooker—just published a pre-print and have an article in review that demonstrates that children of people who served in the US military are more likely to have autism than people who did not serve.” “That is a huge revelation.” “It gets worse when both parents were serving in the US military.” “It gets worse if they were a National Guard reserve or active, but not deployed.” “And just the severity, um, gets worse as well, going from mild, m- moderate to severe autism.” “This is a major issue … and it’s incumbent upon the Department of War to really look into what could be attributing to a higher autism rate in children of the US military.”
1:59

🚨 Dr. Karl Jablonowski just EXPOSED a “huge revelation” about autism. “Children’s Health Defense—myself and my co-author Dr. Brian Hooker—just published a pre-print and have an article in review that demonstrates that children of people who served in the US military are more likely to have autism than people who did not serve.” “That is a huge revelation.” “It gets worse when both parents were serving in the US military.” “It gets worse if they were a National Guard reserve or active, but not deployed.” “And just the severity, um, gets worse as well, going from mild, m- moderate to severe autism.” “This is a major issue … and it’s incumbent upon the Department of War to really look into what could be attributing to a higher autism rate in children of the US military.”

Children’s Health Defense

78,342 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: On NEET-UG 2026 exam cancelled due to allegations of paper leak, NTA DG Abhishek Singh says, "I don't know how you define a leak. But I will call it something which has happened, which has violated the 100% integrity of the examination and our commitment to a zero-error examination. Insofar as the typical, traditional way of leak is concerned, no question paper in the form of a complete question paper has leaked anywhere. What has happened is that a guess paper in the form of a PDF was circulating on WhatsApp, and it had a few questions which were matching with the questions which were asked. When we verified whether this was in circulation before 3rd May, it was found that some of it was. So, given that a few questions were available to some people before the examination, it makes it unfair for the 22.79 lakh students who were preparing for this examination with their hardwork. So, because of that act of a few anti-social elements, we could not have compromised the interest of the honest students. So, we took this tough call of cancelling this examination and ordering a CBI inquiry."
1:28

#WATCH | Delhi: On NEET-UG 2026 exam cancelled due to allegations of paper leak, NTA DG Abhishek Singh says, "I don't know how you define a leak. But I will call it something which has happened, which has violated the 100% integrity of the examination and our commitment to a zero-error examination. Insofar as the typical, traditional way of leak is concerned, no question paper in the form of a complete question paper has leaked anywhere. What has happened is that a guess paper in the form of a PDF was circulating on WhatsApp, and it had a few questions which were matching with the questions which were asked. When we verified whether this was in circulation before 3rd May, it was found that some of it was. So, given that a few questions were available to some people before the examination, it makes it unfair for the 22.79 lakh students who were preparing for this examination with their hardwork. So, because of that act of a few anti-social elements, we could not have compromised the interest of the honest students. So, we took this tough call of cancelling this examination and ordering a CBI inquiry."

ANI

37,524 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨Aaron Siri just EXPOSED the TRUTH about vaccine injuries live in front of the Senate. The first major vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study was finished in 2020. And the results were so SHOCKING that it was never released. “Vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease, 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders.” “There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group but zero in the unvaccinated group … including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and tics.” “Overall, the study found that after 10 years, 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while 57% of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue, often multiple.”
6:10

🚨Aaron Siri just EXPOSED the TRUTH about vaccine injuries live in front of the Senate. The first major vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study was finished in 2020. And the results were so SHOCKING that it was never released. “Vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease, 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders.” “There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group but zero in the unvaccinated group … including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and tics.” “Overall, the study found that after 10 years, 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while 57% of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue, often multiple.”

Health Freedom Defense Fund

368,017 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The results of the study at the heart of our award-winning film “An Inconvenient Study” are shocking. A complaint I hear often is that the study is too small - that there aren’t enough children in the unvaccinated group. For contrast, the Hepatitis-B vaccine that we give newborns only had 147 children in it, with no control and no placebo. They were monitored for 5 days. So, a 5-day safety study with 147 children was good enough for the Hep-B approval, but a study with twenty thousand kids, two thousand of which were unvaccinated, followed for multiple years, is not? Think about that. Weston A. Price Foundation
1:59

The results of the study at the heart of our award-winning film “An Inconvenient Study” are shocking. A complaint I hear often is that the study is too small - that there aren’t enough children in the unvaccinated group. For contrast, the Hepatitis-B vaccine that we give newborns only had 147 children in it, with no control and no placebo. They were monitored for 5 days. So, a 5-day safety study with 147 children was good enough for the Hep-B approval, but a study with twenty thousand kids, two thousand of which were unvaccinated, followed for multiple years, is not? Think about that. Weston A. Price Foundation

Del Bigtree

115,850 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

#WATCH | Hooghly, West Bengal: BJP State General Secretary Locket Chatterjee says, “This is a students' movement. Why would the opposition come in this ongoing movement of children? Why would there be politics in it? When the Congress was in power, a lot of things happened in it. At that time, the question paper was leaked. Nothing happened then. No investigation was done. Our government cancelled the NEET. After that, a fresh exam was conducted. Results were also declared within 25 days…But the sad thing is they are using children; some political parties in the opposition, the Samajwadi Party (SP), the Congress, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)—all want to bring this issue into their party and wash their hands in it. The Congress party, too, didn't participate in the ongoing public movement for so long. When they saw that many people were showing that children were progressing a lot, and that they were going to Parliament, they washed their hands in it….”
3:32

#WATCH | Hooghly, West Bengal: BJP State General Secretary Locket Chatterjee says, “This is a students' movement. Why would the opposition come in this ongoing movement of children? Why would there be politics in it? When the Congress was in power, a lot of things happened in it. At that time, the question paper was leaked. Nothing happened then. No investigation was done. Our government cancelled the NEET. After that, a fresh exam was conducted. Results were also declared within 25 days…But the sad thing is they are using children; some political parties in the opposition, the Samajwadi Party (SP), the Congress, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)—all want to bring this issue into their party and wash their hands in it. The Congress party, too, didn't participate in the ongoing public movement for so long. When they saw that many people were showing that children were progressing a lot, and that they were going to Parliament, they washed their hands in it….”

ANI

26,970 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just declared in no uncertain terms: The Covid-19 shots are the “biggest crime against humanity that’s ever been committed.” And she declared that sudden deaths from Covid-19 shots are an “epidemic.” “These shots are an absolute disaster.” “There was a big study that came out of South Korea that did an evaluation of 22 million people that lived in Seoul and Icheon … that had had at least one Covid shot.” “There was a huge uptick in dementia and in memory loss … and early onset Alzheimer’s.” “It was released as an Emergency Utilization Authorization, which means it came to market without any of the long-term studies … without knowing what the side effects and complications were.” “Pfizer wanted to maintain their records away from the American public for 75 years.” “It was taken to court and the judge said, ‘wait a minute, you wanna wait until everybody involved with this is dead before you bring forth the information that shows what the problems were?’” “Well, the first paper that they released was a 38-page paper.” “The last 8 pages of that paper listed more than 1,200 disease side effects and conditions that they knew that the Covid jab could be associated with.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny
3:16

🚨Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just declared in no uncertain terms: The Covid-19 shots are the “biggest crime against humanity that’s ever been committed.” And she declared that sudden deaths from Covid-19 shots are an “epidemic.” “These shots are an absolute disaster.” “There was a big study that came out of South Korea that did an evaluation of 22 million people that lived in Seoul and Icheon … that had had at least one Covid shot.” “There was a huge uptick in dementia and in memory loss … and early onset Alzheimer’s.” “It was released as an Emergency Utilization Authorization, which means it came to market without any of the long-term studies … without knowing what the side effects and complications were.” “Pfizer wanted to maintain their records away from the American public for 75 years.” “It was taken to court and the judge said, ‘wait a minute, you wanna wait until everybody involved with this is dead before you bring forth the information that shows what the problems were?’” “Well, the first paper that they released was a 38-page paper.” “The last 8 pages of that paper listed more than 1,200 disease side effects and conditions that they knew that the Covid jab could be associated with.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny

Children’s Health Defense

66,905 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

U.S. Brid. Gen Mark Kimmitt explains catastrophic US YPG policy fiasco in Syria: „We told the Turks and our policy that this relationship with the PKK with the YPG was going to be temporary. It was going to be transactional and it was going to be tactical. That was the American policy that time expressed numerous times. It didn't mean that we were long-term allies to the YPG. It meant that we had a specific purpose, for a specific time and at the end of that we were going to break apart.“
3:16

U.S. Brid. Gen Mark Kimmitt explains catastrophic US YPG policy fiasco in Syria: „We told the Turks and our policy that this relationship with the PKK with the YPG was going to be temporary. It was going to be transactional and it was going to be tactical. That was the American policy that time expressed numerous times. It didn't mean that we were long-term allies to the YPG. It meant that we had a specific purpose, for a specific time and at the end of that we were going to break apart.“

Hamparsum Hampikyan

185,153 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 New CDC Data this month shows DTaP Vaccination rates amongst school children are collapsing as a record number of Parents are applying for exemptions Parents are listening! Keep fighting! No more vaccines! Just a reminder— The DTaP vaccine is an “updated” version of the DTP vaccine we give to American children today. Listen to what Bill Gates did with The DTP Vaccine involving The Mass Genocide of girls in Africa. “The most popular vaccine in the world is the the DTP vaccine. We got rid of it in this country because it was causing severe brain injuries or death, 1 in every 300 children…. We used it in the 80’s and that’s why there was all this litigation against vaccine companies that precipitated the passage of the Vaccine Act, that then gave them immunity from liability… In Europe they don’t use it, in America they don’t use it, but they give it to 161 million African children every year.” Bill Gates asked the Danish government to support that program and said it saved 30 million lives. The Danish government said, Show isis the Data. Bill Gates wasn’t able to. The Danish Government went to Africa and did their own studies and they looked at 30 years of DTP data and what they found shocked them all. They found that African girls who got the DTP were dying at 10x the rate of unvaccinated girls. They were dying of things that nobody had ever associated with the DTP vaccine. They were dying of anemia, malaria, bilharzia, pulmonary disease, respiratory disease, and pneumonia. Nobody noticed for 30 years that it was the vaccinated girls and not the unvaccinated girls that were dying. What happened was these girls were not dying of Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis… the vaccine protected them against those, but it RUINED their immune systems. They were unable to defend themselves against minor diseases that other children with hearty immune systems were able to fend off.…” That DTP vaccine is still given to children in poorer countries worldwide. This Clip
1:49

🚨 New CDC Data this month shows DTaP Vaccination rates amongst school children are collapsing as a record number of Parents are applying for exemptions Parents are listening! Keep fighting! No more vaccines! Just a reminder— The DTaP vaccine is an “updated” version of the DTP vaccine we give to American children today. Listen to what Bill Gates did with The DTP Vaccine involving The Mass Genocide of girls in Africa. “The most popular vaccine in the world is the the DTP vaccine. We got rid of it in this country because it was causing severe brain injuries or death, 1 in every 300 children…. We used it in the 80’s and that’s why there was all this litigation against vaccine companies that precipitated the passage of the Vaccine Act, that then gave them immunity from liability… In Europe they don’t use it, in America they don’t use it, but they give it to 161 million African children every year.” Bill Gates asked the Danish government to support that program and said it saved 30 million lives. The Danish government said, Show isis the Data. Bill Gates wasn’t able to. The Danish Government went to Africa and did their own studies and they looked at 30 years of DTP data and what they found shocked them all. They found that African girls who got the DTP were dying at 10x the rate of unvaccinated girls. They were dying of things that nobody had ever associated with the DTP vaccine. They were dying of anemia, malaria, bilharzia, pulmonary disease, respiratory disease, and pneumonia. Nobody noticed for 30 years that it was the vaccinated girls and not the unvaccinated girls that were dying. What happened was these girls were not dying of Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis… the vaccine protected them against those, but it RUINED their immune systems. They were unable to defend themselves against minor diseases that other children with hearty immune systems were able to fend off.…” That DTP vaccine is still given to children in poorer countries worldwide. This Clip

MJTruthUltra

90,565 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

David Simon on the barriers "The Wire" (2002-2008) faced: "Interviewer: Do you think the fact you're telling stories in different ways than is traditional, and it has this darkness to it, was that the big barrier to the show becoming more popular than it was? Would you say it was the racial makeup of the cast? Simon: There were a lot of barriers. The racial makeup of the cast was problematic and we knew that going in. The complexity of the serial itself -- the fact that you couldn't miss a couple of episodes and feel comfortable watching it. Though I think that HBO was a wonderful vehicle for that with the multiple viewings, the DVDs and ultimately with On Demand. It was less of a problem as the show went on. It was also less of a problem as people who watched the show got used to its rhythms. The first season was on some level training the audience to watch television a little bit differently, and reducing the expectations in terms of pacing, in terms of cliffhangers, in terms of the requirement to absorb detail or even to look for symbolism. Those were problems. The other problem is, no easy gratifications, other than some real effort at careful characterization and humor. That was it. Without the humor, it would have been unbearable. Without an acknowledgement of the humanity of the characters, despite all their flaws, their vanities, their absurdities -- if on some level, you can't make people care about the characters, you've got a problem no matter what you're doing. We had some obligations to people if they wanted to watch, but a happy ending was not among the list of obligations." (David Simon's interview with Alan Sepinwall, 2008) P.S: On this day, 24 years ago, the first episode of "The Wire" was aired worldwide.
2:34

David Simon on the barriers "The Wire" (2002-2008) faced: "Interviewer: Do you think the fact you're telling stories in different ways than is traditional, and it has this darkness to it, was that the big barrier to the show becoming more popular than it was? Would you say it was the racial makeup of the cast? Simon: There were a lot of barriers. The racial makeup of the cast was problematic and we knew that going in. The complexity of the serial itself -- the fact that you couldn't miss a couple of episodes and feel comfortable watching it. Though I think that HBO was a wonderful vehicle for that with the multiple viewings, the DVDs and ultimately with On Demand. It was less of a problem as the show went on. It was also less of a problem as people who watched the show got used to its rhythms. The first season was on some level training the audience to watch television a little bit differently, and reducing the expectations in terms of pacing, in terms of cliffhangers, in terms of the requirement to absorb detail or even to look for symbolism. Those were problems. The other problem is, no easy gratifications, other than some real effort at careful characterization and humor. That was it. Without the humor, it would have been unbearable. Without an acknowledgement of the humanity of the characters, despite all their flaws, their vanities, their absurdities -- if on some level, you can't make people care about the characters, you've got a problem no matter what you're doing. We had some obligations to people if they wanted to watch, but a happy ending was not among the list of obligations." (David Simon's interview with Alan Sepinwall, 2008) P.S: On this day, 24 years ago, the first episode of "The Wire" was aired worldwide.

DepressedBergman

33,114 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Oncologist Dr. William Makis describes getting attacked by the president of City of Hope cancer centers for publishing success stories using antiparasitics to treat turbo cancers: "These antiparasitics are being heavily attacked and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, [and] fenbendazole. And I have hundreds of success stories...." This clip of Dr. Makis, a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from a panel discussion posted to the World Council for Health Rumble channel on November 24, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So these antiparasitics are being heavily attacked, and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, fenbendazole, and I have hundreds of success stories. I get attacked. I get attacked by mainstream doctors and mainstream oncologists. "And just going back to what Kevin McKernan said about this phenomenon of trying to retract papers, get good papers retracted, I've had this happen to me very recently. We published recently a paper on fenbendazole. Three cases of stage four cancer patients who had failed three or four or five lines of chemotherapy, and mainstream oncology regimens. These cancer patients were dying. They took fenbendazole and they became cancer free. And we followed them up, up to three years. They stayed cancer three for up to three years. So we had three cases. We published this paper a few months ago. This was only the second paper published on the antiparasitic fenbendazole in the past five years with human cases. The first one was published by Stanford University in 2021. And so they had published three cases in 2021. We published three cases in 2025. Within a month or two of the publication of our paper. Now it passed peer review and it was published. We were attacked by the editor of the paper, who's actually the president of the City of Hope cancer centers in the United States, in Atlanta, Chicago, and Phoenix. "This was Dr. Maurice [Maurie] Markman, President of City of Hope, so a big time oncologist, with a lot of, you know, big pharma funding behind him. He said he's going to pull the paper. And they didn't have a good reason to pull the paper. In fact, the reason that they were putting was that I was giving, you know, medical advice to other cancer patients with fenbendazole. And so that was some kind of a conflict of interest. And because, you know, that wasn't declared in the way they liked, that they were going to pull the paper. "And so, you know, this is an attack. We're going to see these attacks not just on Kevin McKernan and David Speicher's work in trying to make the link between Covid vaccines and these turbo cancers. But even those of us who are going to try to treat these patients, and help these patients and try to get that work published with antiparasitics and these turbo cancers, we're being attacked, and our papers are being attacked for retraction as well." #Fenbendazole #Ivermectin #Cancercure
2:33

Oncologist Dr. William Makis describes getting attacked by the president of City of Hope cancer centers for publishing success stories using antiparasitics to treat turbo cancers: "These antiparasitics are being heavily attacked and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, [and] fenbendazole. And I have hundreds of success stories...." This clip of Dr. Makis, a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from a panel discussion posted to the World Council for Health Rumble channel on November 24, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So these antiparasitics are being heavily attacked, and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, fenbendazole, and I have hundreds of success stories. I get attacked. I get attacked by mainstream doctors and mainstream oncologists. "And just going back to what Kevin McKernan said about this phenomenon of trying to retract papers, get good papers retracted, I've had this happen to me very recently. We published recently a paper on fenbendazole. Three cases of stage four cancer patients who had failed three or four or five lines of chemotherapy, and mainstream oncology regimens. These cancer patients were dying. They took fenbendazole and they became cancer free. And we followed them up, up to three years. They stayed cancer three for up to three years. So we had three cases. We published this paper a few months ago. This was only the second paper published on the antiparasitic fenbendazole in the past five years with human cases. The first one was published by Stanford University in 2021. And so they had published three cases in 2021. We published three cases in 2025. Within a month or two of the publication of our paper. Now it passed peer review and it was published. We were attacked by the editor of the paper, who's actually the president of the City of Hope cancer centers in the United States, in Atlanta, Chicago, and Phoenix. "This was Dr. Maurice [Maurie] Markman, President of City of Hope, so a big time oncologist, with a lot of, you know, big pharma funding behind him. He said he's going to pull the paper. And they didn't have a good reason to pull the paper. In fact, the reason that they were putting was that I was giving, you know, medical advice to other cancer patients with fenbendazole. And so that was some kind of a conflict of interest. And because, you know, that wasn't declared in the way they liked, that they were going to pull the paper. "And so, you know, this is an attack. We're going to see these attacks not just on Kevin McKernan and David Speicher's work in trying to make the link between Covid vaccines and these turbo cancers. But even those of us who are going to try to treat these patients, and help these patients and try to get that work published with antiparasitics and these turbo cancers, we're being attacked, and our papers are being attacked for retraction as well." #Fenbendazole #Ivermectin #Cancercure

Joe Tippens

32,293 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

President Trump declares that California’s election system is worse than any third world country following Spencer Pratt’s defeat to Nithya Raman for LA mayor. "California's recent election for mayor of LA and governor was held on June 2nd, Long time ago, but it was just completed a few days ago on July 10th.” "Think of that, much more than one month.” "Took a month to count the votes. I wonder what they were doing. This is worse than any third world country. There's no third world country.”
1:15

President Trump declares that California’s election system is worse than any third world country following Spencer Pratt’s defeat to Nithya Raman for LA mayor. "California's recent election for mayor of LA and governor was held on June 2nd, Long time ago, but it was just completed a few days ago on July 10th.” "Think of that, much more than one month.” "Took a month to count the votes. I wonder what they were doing. This is worse than any third world country. There's no third world country.”

Andrew Kolvet

83,502 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

17% vs. 57%: The Staggering Chronic Illness Difference Between Unvaxxed and Vaxxed Kids A Major Study Found—Before It Was Buried. A bombshell revelation from attorney Aaron Siri exposes a systemic corruption of science that has left parents in the dark for decades. Leading up to 2013, the U.S. government paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review ALL existing science to confirm the safety of the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule. Their finding? “The studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule… have not been conducted.” They found ZERO studies comparing the long-term health of fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children. The IOM could only conclude “there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe”—a far cry from proving it is safe. They noted such a study was possible using large medical databases. A 2015 CDC white paper even outlined how to do it. Yet, the government never did. In 2017, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sought to answer this critical question. They met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center—a mainstream, pro-vaccine doctor who conducts clinical trials for companies like Moderna. He agreed to conduct the study. Using actual medical records from 2000-2016, his team compared children with no vaccines to those who had one or more. The sample was large: ~2,000 unvaxxed vs. ~16,000 vaxxed. The results were staggering, and all statistically significant. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated children had: ▪️ 4.29x higher rate of ASTHMA ▪️ 3.03x higher rate of ATOPIC DISEASE ▪️ 5.96x higher rate of AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE ▪️ 5.53x higher rate of NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS - Including 3.28x DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY - And 4.47x SPEECH DISORDER For conditions like ADHD, learning disabilities, and intellectual disabilities, there were HUNDREDS of cases in the vaccinated group and ZERO in the unvaccinated. The overarching finding: By age 10, only 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic illness. Among the vaccinated, that number skyrocketed to 57%. This was the study that was never done. The one the IOM called for. And its findings were devastating to the official narrative. So what happened? The study was completed in early 2020… and then buried. Aaron Siri states that the researchers, despite affirming the study was well-designed, refused to publish it. Dr. Zervos reportedly said he “didn’t want to lose his job.” The co-author said she “did not want to make doctors uncomfortable.” This is the corruption of science in plain sight. Studies that confirm the desired outcome are published. Those that don’t are shoved in a drawer. We must be able to have honest science to ensure we are protecting children from infectious diseases without causing widespread chronic harm. The public deserves the truth.
6:12

17% vs. 57%: The Staggering Chronic Illness Difference Between Unvaxxed and Vaxxed Kids A Major Study Found—Before It Was Buried. A bombshell revelation from attorney Aaron Siri exposes a systemic corruption of science that has left parents in the dark for decades. Leading up to 2013, the U.S. government paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review ALL existing science to confirm the safety of the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule. Their finding? “The studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule… have not been conducted.” They found ZERO studies comparing the long-term health of fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children. The IOM could only conclude “there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe”—a far cry from proving it is safe. They noted such a study was possible using large medical databases. A 2015 CDC white paper even outlined how to do it. Yet, the government never did. In 2017, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sought to answer this critical question. They met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center—a mainstream, pro-vaccine doctor who conducts clinical trials for companies like Moderna. He agreed to conduct the study. Using actual medical records from 2000-2016, his team compared children with no vaccines to those who had one or more. The sample was large: ~2,000 unvaxxed vs. ~16,000 vaxxed. The results were staggering, and all statistically significant. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated children had: ▪️ 4.29x higher rate of ASTHMA ▪️ 3.03x higher rate of ATOPIC DISEASE ▪️ 5.96x higher rate of AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE ▪️ 5.53x higher rate of NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS - Including 3.28x DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY - And 4.47x SPEECH DISORDER For conditions like ADHD, learning disabilities, and intellectual disabilities, there were HUNDREDS of cases in the vaccinated group and ZERO in the unvaccinated. The overarching finding: By age 10, only 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic illness. Among the vaccinated, that number skyrocketed to 57%. This was the study that was never done. The one the IOM called for. And its findings were devastating to the official narrative. So what happened? The study was completed in early 2020… and then buried. Aaron Siri states that the researchers, despite affirming the study was well-designed, refused to publish it. Dr. Zervos reportedly said he “didn’t want to lose his job.” The co-author said she “did not want to make doctors uncomfortable.” This is the corruption of science in plain sight. Studies that confirm the desired outcome are published. Those that don’t are shoved in a drawer. We must be able to have honest science to ensure we are protecting children from infectious diseases without causing widespread chronic harm. The public deserves the truth.

Camus

1,050,854 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

GIVE PEACE A CHANCE First released on July 4, 1969. Yoko: All those Vietnam protests really changed the world. There was always that element who were really resisting it. That was the saving grace – that people were aware that they were that young generation who were really against it. And so it worked very well for the world. And the Bed-In was just part of it, a definite part of it. It was a statement on a very theatrical level and I think it was very effective. We were artists and did it our own way. We felt very good about it then, and it was such an incredibly strange thing that we were doing. At the time it was a courageous thing to do. John was making the statement in a way that he was looking at the far, far future. I saw it in his eyes. He was saying, ‘OK this is what we’re going to do together.’ And we’re going to give peace a chance. To the world.
0:22

GIVE PEACE A CHANCE First released on July 4, 1969. Yoko: All those Vietnam protests really changed the world. There was always that element who were really resisting it. That was the saving grace – that people were aware that they were that young generation who were really against it. And so it worked very well for the world. And the Bed-In was just part of it, a definite part of it. It was a statement on a very theatrical level and I think it was very effective. We were artists and did it our own way. We felt very good about it then, and it was such an incredibly strange thing that we were doing. At the time it was a courageous thing to do. John was making the statement in a way that he was looking at the far, far future. I saw it in his eyes. He was saying, ‘OK this is what we’re going to do together.’ And we’re going to give peace a chance. To the world.

Yoko Ono

124,518 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dr. Brian Hooker says some pediatricians are making half a million dollars a year from vaccinating children. “We were able to get the incentive program for one of the largest HMOs in the United States, and it was Anthem Blue Cross.” “What we found was that pediatricians stood to make over a half a million dollars a year if 63% or more of their pediatric practice was fully vaccinated.” “They could get $600 per patient.” Brian Hooker, PhD
0:51

Dr. Brian Hooker says some pediatricians are making half a million dollars a year from vaccinating children. “We were able to get the incentive program for one of the largest HMOs in the United States, and it was Anthem Blue Cross.” “What we found was that pediatricians stood to make over a half a million dollars a year if 63% or more of their pediatric practice was fully vaccinated.” “They could get $600 per patient.” Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

21,944 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten