Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

BREAKING: ARCCA experts ALLOWED. Judge Beverly Cannone finally admitted that her & Hank Brennan’s whole histrionic-filled, months-long smear campaign of defense counsel & the ARCCA experts was purely that—a smear campaign designed to prejudice the defense and their most exculpatory experts to the media & the public. Good job...

OliviaLambo_'s profile picture

Olivia

28,163 subscribers

89,255 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaKomedi
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

ARCCA VOIR DIRE #KarenRead The Commonwealth has never produced ANY of its communications with its experts in discovery. They also staunchly opposed/fought turning over phone records of witnesses in this murder case. The defense, however, has turned over every single one of its communications with its experts from ARCCA, including those outside the scope of typical Rule 14 reciprocal discovery provisions. Because apparently these are far more important than actual evidence of third party culprits in a murder case—screenshots will do for those, if they exist! Ironically, it was upon the defense’s timely production of its reciprocal discovery in compliance with Rule 14 that Judge Beverly Cannone has punished them for apparently being so forthcoming and transparent. And this is for experts that the Commonwealth has had equal access to, as they were made available to both sides by the Feds. For reference: Judge Beverly Cannone denied the defense’s Rule 17 Motion seeking Jen McCabe’s phone records, but was swiftly overturned by the Supreme Judicial Court in 2023. Curiously, the Commonwealth steadfastly opposed & fought against the defense’s access to those evidentiary and relevant phone records for their supposedly innocent & forthcoming witness. What are they hiding? At the same time, Jen McCabe promptly hired high-profile murder defense attorney Kevin Reddington to help in the fight to obstruct justice for her “close friend”, John O’Keefe, by helping her fight the request for her phone records. ————— Who’s really the one hiding things? Why hasn’t the Commonwealth turned over any of its communications with its experts? How is this fair? ————— Attached: See the Court’s latest order for even more discovery from the defense and ARCCA. To be discussed today. #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:44

ARCCA VOIR DIRE #KarenRead The Commonwealth has never produced ANY of its communications with its experts in discovery. They also staunchly opposed/fought turning over phone records of witnesses in this murder case. The defense, however, has turned over every single one of its communications with its experts from ARCCA, including those outside the scope of typical Rule 14 reciprocal discovery provisions. Because apparently these are far more important than actual evidence of third party culprits in a murder case—screenshots will do for those, if they exist! Ironically, it was upon the defense’s timely production of its reciprocal discovery in compliance with Rule 14 that Judge Beverly Cannone has punished them for apparently being so forthcoming and transparent. And this is for experts that the Commonwealth has had equal access to, as they were made available to both sides by the Feds. For reference: Judge Beverly Cannone denied the defense’s Rule 17 Motion seeking Jen McCabe’s phone records, but was swiftly overturned by the Supreme Judicial Court in 2023. Curiously, the Commonwealth steadfastly opposed & fought against the defense’s access to those evidentiary and relevant phone records for their supposedly innocent & forthcoming witness. What are they hiding? At the same time, Jen McCabe promptly hired high-profile murder defense attorney Kevin Reddington to help in the fight to obstruct justice for her “close friend”, John O’Keefe, by helping her fight the request for her phone records. ————— Who’s really the one hiding things? Why hasn’t the Commonwealth turned over any of its communications with its experts? How is this fair? ————— Attached: See the Court’s latest order for even more discovery from the defense and ARCCA. To be discussed today. #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

42,976 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

JACKSON AND THE DELETED ARCCA MESSAGES In what may have been his most absurd argument to date, Robert Alessi attempted to persuade Judge Cannone that the defense was under no obligation to turn over the "text" of the "text messages" they had been ordered to produce in discovery since they were not in "existence" due to being deleted. The Judge and Alessi then went back and forth as to the length of time a lawyer is required to keep client records. According to a clarification by the Massachusetts BBO in 2018, client records in criminal cases must be kept for a period of 10 years AFTER completion of representation. This includes electronic correspondence. Alessi's asinine argument can be viewed in the below video, and with it, snippets from an explanation of the record keeping requirements from the BBO. I am also including a link to the full commentary on records. Judge Cannone did find after Alessi's argument that they were indeed in violation of discovery requirements.
2:56

JACKSON AND THE DELETED ARCCA MESSAGES In what may have been his most absurd argument to date, Robert Alessi attempted to persuade Judge Cannone that the defense was under no obligation to turn over the "text" of the "text messages" they had been ordered to produce in discovery since they were not in "existence" due to being deleted. The Judge and Alessi then went back and forth as to the length of time a lawyer is required to keep client records. According to a clarification by the Massachusetts BBO in 2018, client records in criminal cases must be kept for a period of 10 years AFTER completion of representation. This includes electronic correspondence. Alessi's asinine argument can be viewed in the below video, and with it, snippets from an explanation of the record keeping requirements from the BBO. I am also including a link to the full commentary on records. Judge Cannone did find after Alessi's argument that they were indeed in violation of discovery requirements.

Julie Carpenter

16,614 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨Karen Read Update🚨 Judge Cannone appears visibly rattled after Prosecutor Hank Brennan raised potential discovery violations regarding the ARCCA experts, Wolfe and Rentschler. It appeared to me that Alan Jackson’s Pro Hac Vice ticket is in serious peril…which translates into Judge Cannone removing him from the case. If this occurs, this would obviously delay trial.
4:09

🚨Karen Read Update🚨 Judge Cannone appears visibly rattled after Prosecutor Hank Brennan raised potential discovery violations regarding the ARCCA experts, Wolfe and Rentschler. It appeared to me that Alan Jackson’s Pro Hac Vice ticket is in serious peril…which translates into Judge Cannone removing him from the case. If this occurs, this would obviously delay trial.

Defense Diaries

80,958 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Why is this Judge YET AGAIN improperly and inappropriately interjecting herself to protect witnesses like Jen McCabe—witnesses who lied to the FBI, no less!? Here she literally answers for the witness! This is so inappropriate and disgusting to see how eager she is to protect obviously deceitful witnesses and keep the truth from the jury. Judge Beverly Cannone is so completely out of line. She apparently doesn’t care about judicial erring all over the place! #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:36

Why is this Judge YET AGAIN improperly and inappropriately interjecting herself to protect witnesses like Jen McCabe—witnesses who lied to the FBI, no less!? Here she literally answers for the witness! This is so inappropriate and disgusting to see how eager she is to protect obviously deceitful witnesses and keep the truth from the jury. Judge Beverly Cannone is so completely out of line. She apparently doesn’t care about judicial erring all over the place! #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

88,661 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Let this sink in: We have all of the existing records of communications between the defense and the ARCCA experts, who were hired by the Feds, but we don’t have ANY of the phone records of communications for Brian Albert, the homeowner whose property John O’Keefe’s body was found on, Brian Higgins or Colin Albert. Daniel Wolfe—the ARCCA experts—were not present during nor did they have anything to do with Officer John O’Keefe’s murder. But apparently Wolfe’s communications with the defense about his report he did for the Feds, which the Commonwealth also has had in its possession, are more important than the actual evidence in the murder of John O’Keefe that could shed light on who his true killers are. Can you imagine if Wolfe came in with a packet of printed out screenshots that he claimed were real because he destroyed his phone around the time that the court ordered his communications? Oh wait, that’s what the third party culprits did. And then the Commonwealth actually entered that in as legitimate evidence in a murder trial. Go figure! Priorities. Justice? Anything but. #ARCCA #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:52

Let this sink in: We have all of the existing records of communications between the defense and the ARCCA experts, who were hired by the Feds, but we don’t have ANY of the phone records of communications for Brian Albert, the homeowner whose property John O’Keefe’s body was found on, Brian Higgins or Colin Albert. Daniel Wolfe—the ARCCA experts—were not present during nor did they have anything to do with Officer John O’Keefe’s murder. But apparently Wolfe’s communications with the defense about his report he did for the Feds, which the Commonwealth also has had in its possession, are more important than the actual evidence in the murder of John O’Keefe that could shed light on who his true killers are. Can you imagine if Wolfe came in with a packet of printed out screenshots that he claimed were real because he destroyed his phone around the time that the court ordered his communications? Oh wait, that’s what the third party culprits did. And then the Commonwealth actually entered that in as legitimate evidence in a murder trial. Go figure! Priorities. Justice? Anything but. #ARCCA #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

54,273 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Wow. Judge Beverly Cannone & Hank Brennan both knew that the first line of Shanon Burgess’ latest May 8, 2025 report—which was turned over halfway through trial in the ultimate ambush on the defense—stated: “Dear Mr. Brennan, pursuant to your request, I have completed an additional analysis concerning the above referenced matter. To formulate opinions, the following additional items were reviewed…”. Last week, in open court, Hank Brennan denied having asked Burgess for the new, May 8, 2025, report, instead claiming it was a surprise and he wasn’t expecting it. The Judge knew this was a lie, as she claimed she had reviewed said report, yet despite this fact, she still allowed the Commonwealth to use it at trial. Where are her grave concerns about candor to the court? Moreover, this admission in Burgess’ report also reveals that he did in fact violate the sequestration order—something the Judge also swept under the rug and ignored. I’ve run out of words to describe this Judge at this point, but make no mistake, she is the leader of this state-sanctioned lynching of an innocent woman. Judge Cannone knew that Hank Brennan was lying to her face in open court last week, and she also knew that this witness had violated her court ordered sequestration. Oh, and please, don’t even try me with the “it was a mistake, he copied and pasted” aka ADA Lally and Michael Proctor’s same nonsensical scrivener’s error excuse. These are court documents, which are to be true and accurate. If you can’t get your basic facts right, you should not be engaging in expert analysis where your job is to submit forensic reports for use in court. Further proof of the violation of the sequestration order coming in next post. #Aperture #ShanonBurgess #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
1:41

Wow. Judge Beverly Cannone & Hank Brennan both knew that the first line of Shanon Burgess’ latest May 8, 2025 report—which was turned over halfway through trial in the ultimate ambush on the defense—stated: “Dear Mr. Brennan, pursuant to your request, I have completed an additional analysis concerning the above referenced matter. To formulate opinions, the following additional items were reviewed…”. Last week, in open court, Hank Brennan denied having asked Burgess for the new, May 8, 2025, report, instead claiming it was a surprise and he wasn’t expecting it. The Judge knew this was a lie, as she claimed she had reviewed said report, yet despite this fact, she still allowed the Commonwealth to use it at trial. Where are her grave concerns about candor to the court? Moreover, this admission in Burgess’ report also reveals that he did in fact violate the sequestration order—something the Judge also swept under the rug and ignored. I’ve run out of words to describe this Judge at this point, but make no mistake, she is the leader of this state-sanctioned lynching of an innocent woman. Judge Cannone knew that Hank Brennan was lying to her face in open court last week, and she also knew that this witness had violated her court ordered sequestration. Oh, and please, don’t even try me with the “it was a mistake, he copied and pasted” aka ADA Lally and Michael Proctor’s same nonsensical scrivener’s error excuse. These are court documents, which are to be true and accurate. If you can’t get your basic facts right, you should not be engaging in expert analysis where your job is to submit forensic reports for use in court. Further proof of the violation of the sequestration order coming in next post. #Aperture #ShanonBurgess #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

107,370 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Hank Brennan brazenly lied in open court yesterday, misrepresenting key evidence in this case in order to persuade Judge Beverly Cannone to keep the truth from the jury—aka Trooper Joe Paul & the Commonwealth’s original accident theory from the first trial. He doesn’t mind lying - on camera, in open court - forgetting we’ve got the receipts. ————— But first, a quick reminder: Massachusetts Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3(a)(1): A lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of fact to a tribunal. ————— Now to the voir dire of Dr. Judson Welcher… Alessi exposed that Welcher’s conclusions were built by including reports from other experts—Trooper Paul’s crash report and ME Irini Scordi-Bello. Regarding Trooper Paul, Alessi highlighted two examples: • A drone photo of 34 Fairview Rd • A Techstream chart The drone photo: The exact same overhead image appeared in both Paul’s report and Welcher’s—Welcher just zoomed in to disguise it. The Techstream chart: • Identical chart from Paul’s report • Welcher claimed he never saw it in Paul’s materials • Alessi walked up, showed Welcher Paul’s report—and turned it toward the courtroom camera for all to see ————— Then Brennan jumped in and—true to form—told the court everything but the truth. He claimed the drone photo came from SERT, not Trooper Paul. Flat-out lie. Because in Trial 1, Trooper Paul clearly testified he was the only one who used drone footage of 34 Fairview. The SERT report used a different overhead shot, which Paul did include in his report. But the image in question clearly was created by Trooper Paul. Brennan knew that. He just doesn’t care about knowingly making false representations in open court. That’s the environment Beverly Cannone has created in this case. ————— Judge Cannone’s inaction on this matter yesterday is also troubling. The jury at the first trial notably only had one question/request for the attorneys and the court about the evidence once their deliberations began. Their request? The SERT report. What was notable about it? No such report existed. It was an issue thoroughly discussed how best to handle by both sides and Judge Cannone at the time. A memorable moment. Certainly, Judge Cannone remembers this fact—not only for its significance in this case, but also as it was further emphasized by this jury request at the first trial. This morning will be telling. Will Judge Cannone play dumb on this issue? Why didn’t she interject yesterday the moment Hank Brennan blatantly lied about this key evidence in open court? If the explanation is that Judge Cannone has forgotten key, fundamental facts of this case from just a year ago, then what is she doing presiding over this case? #KarenRead #HankBrennan #JudsonWelcher #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:24

Hank Brennan brazenly lied in open court yesterday, misrepresenting key evidence in this case in order to persuade Judge Beverly Cannone to keep the truth from the jury—aka Trooper Joe Paul & the Commonwealth’s original accident theory from the first trial. He doesn’t mind lying - on camera, in open court - forgetting we’ve got the receipts. ————— But first, a quick reminder: Massachusetts Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3(a)(1): A lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of fact to a tribunal. ————— Now to the voir dire of Dr. Judson Welcher… Alessi exposed that Welcher’s conclusions were built by including reports from other experts—Trooper Paul’s crash report and ME Irini Scordi-Bello. Regarding Trooper Paul, Alessi highlighted two examples: • A drone photo of 34 Fairview Rd • A Techstream chart The drone photo: The exact same overhead image appeared in both Paul’s report and Welcher’s—Welcher just zoomed in to disguise it. The Techstream chart: • Identical chart from Paul’s report • Welcher claimed he never saw it in Paul’s materials • Alessi walked up, showed Welcher Paul’s report—and turned it toward the courtroom camera for all to see ————— Then Brennan jumped in and—true to form—told the court everything but the truth. He claimed the drone photo came from SERT, not Trooper Paul. Flat-out lie. Because in Trial 1, Trooper Paul clearly testified he was the only one who used drone footage of 34 Fairview. The SERT report used a different overhead shot, which Paul did include in his report. But the image in question clearly was created by Trooper Paul. Brennan knew that. He just doesn’t care about knowingly making false representations in open court. That’s the environment Beverly Cannone has created in this case. ————— Judge Cannone’s inaction on this matter yesterday is also troubling. The jury at the first trial notably only had one question/request for the attorneys and the court about the evidence once their deliberations began. Their request? The SERT report. What was notable about it? No such report existed. It was an issue thoroughly discussed how best to handle by both sides and Judge Cannone at the time. A memorable moment. Certainly, Judge Cannone remembers this fact—not only for its significance in this case, but also as it was further emphasized by this jury request at the first trial. This morning will be telling. Will Judge Cannone play dumb on this issue? Why didn’t she interject yesterday the moment Hank Brennan blatantly lied about this key evidence in open court? If the explanation is that Judge Cannone has forgotten key, fundamental facts of this case from just a year ago, then what is she doing presiding over this case? #KarenRead #HankBrennan #JudsonWelcher #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

51,284 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Despite stating that “only medical doctors” are qualified & can testify as to the medical causation of an injury on June 18, 2024, Judge Cannone just ruled that Mr. Crosby can testify to the medical causation of an injury even though he’s not a medical doctor, he’s not a forensic odontologist or veterinarian, and he has no medical training or experience. Apparently, the Court’s rules, case law, and the rules of criminal procedure don’t apply to the prosecution, but are applied with the highest, strictest, most unreasonable and impossible to meet standards to the defense. In Judge Bev’s court, Karen Read’s defense team has the burden of proof! Even though criminal defendants are presumed innocent, if you don’t have at least $5 million dollars to throw away, you’re f*cked! And if you do, you’re still f*cked! Especially in Judge Beverly Cannone’s court. Is Judge Beverly Cannone unwell? I’ve truly not seen such a nonsensical decision that’s so obviously in direct contradiction with the Court’s own stated ruling on qualifying medical causation experts. In her decision, Judge Cannone states: “The defendant's objection goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility.” Either Judge Cannone is lying or she doesn’t read the defense’s moving papers and affidavits, because the defense laid out a 15-page Motion, and 6-page Affidavit from its already qualified expert Dr. Marie Russell, detailing how Mr. Crosby is unqualified to offer medical causation testimony under the Daubert Lanigan standard. The Daubert Lanigan standard has everything to do with the admissibility of evidence, or expert testimony, and nothing to do with “the weight of the evidence.” But I thought Judge Cannone knew that? Her decision today suggests otherwise. Foundationally, it is undisputed that Mr. Crosby is not a medical doctor. He thus fails per se the “crucial” qualifications inquiry of the Daubert-Lanigan standard; this failure is not curable. On this basis alone his testimony must be excluded as he fails to meet the first, and crucial, prong of the Daubert-Lanigan standard for the reason expressed in the Court’s June 18th ruling during the first trial. In addition, the methodology that Crosby proffered is not generally accepted in the relevant medical community and is otherwise unreliable. But, who cares about the law, or Judge Bev’s candor to the court, right? Apparently in Massachusetts, candor to the court doesn’t apply to judges and they’re permitted to make amorphous, ever-evolving, fluid statements and rulings not based in the law, but rather subjectively and selectively applied to benefit one side. If ever you needed proof to show you just how unfit this Judge is to preside over this case—because her emotions and bias so overwhelm her ability to make fair, impartial rulings rooted in the law, literally causing her to defy her own standard previously stated in this courtroom on the record—well, here it is. If the Judge’s own standard is selectively enforced to ALWAYS prejudice the defendant and benefit the Commonwealth, then why do we even have standards to begin with? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead
0:35

Despite stating that “only medical doctors” are qualified & can testify as to the medical causation of an injury on June 18, 2024, Judge Cannone just ruled that Mr. Crosby can testify to the medical causation of an injury even though he’s not a medical doctor, he’s not a forensic odontologist or veterinarian, and he has no medical training or experience. Apparently, the Court’s rules, case law, and the rules of criminal procedure don’t apply to the prosecution, but are applied with the highest, strictest, most unreasonable and impossible to meet standards to the defense. In Judge Bev’s court, Karen Read’s defense team has the burden of proof! Even though criminal defendants are presumed innocent, if you don’t have at least $5 million dollars to throw away, you’re f*cked! And if you do, you’re still f*cked! Especially in Judge Beverly Cannone’s court. Is Judge Beverly Cannone unwell? I’ve truly not seen such a nonsensical decision that’s so obviously in direct contradiction with the Court’s own stated ruling on qualifying medical causation experts. In her decision, Judge Cannone states: “The defendant's objection goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility.” Either Judge Cannone is lying or she doesn’t read the defense’s moving papers and affidavits, because the defense laid out a 15-page Motion, and 6-page Affidavit from its already qualified expert Dr. Marie Russell, detailing how Mr. Crosby is unqualified to offer medical causation testimony under the Daubert Lanigan standard. The Daubert Lanigan standard has everything to do with the admissibility of evidence, or expert testimony, and nothing to do with “the weight of the evidence.” But I thought Judge Cannone knew that? Her decision today suggests otherwise. Foundationally, it is undisputed that Mr. Crosby is not a medical doctor. He thus fails per se the “crucial” qualifications inquiry of the Daubert-Lanigan standard; this failure is not curable. On this basis alone his testimony must be excluded as he fails to meet the first, and crucial, prong of the Daubert-Lanigan standard for the reason expressed in the Court’s June 18th ruling during the first trial. In addition, the methodology that Crosby proffered is not generally accepted in the relevant medical community and is otherwise unreliable. But, who cares about the law, or Judge Bev’s candor to the court, right? Apparently in Massachusetts, candor to the court doesn’t apply to judges and they’re permitted to make amorphous, ever-evolving, fluid statements and rulings not based in the law, but rather subjectively and selectively applied to benefit one side. If ever you needed proof to show you just how unfit this Judge is to preside over this case—because her emotions and bias so overwhelm her ability to make fair, impartial rulings rooted in the law, literally causing her to defy her own standard previously stated in this courtroom on the record—well, here it is. If the Judge’s own standard is selectively enforced to ALWAYS prejudice the defendant and benefit the Commonwealth, then why do we even have standards to begin with? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead

Olivia

85,088 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce