Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Why is this Judge YET AGAIN improperly and inappropriately interjecting herself to protect witnesses like Jen McCabe—witnesses who lied to the FBI, no less!? Here she literally answers for the witness! This is so inappropriate and disgusting to see how eager she is to protect obviously deceitful witnesses and...

88,661 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Matt Kubacki
Matt Kubacki1 год назад

I try not to ever want to speak ill of a judge, but this is infuriating to watch. Especially on a key witness like this.

Фото профиля Olivia
Olivia1 год назад

That and many of the objections to proper questions that she sustains. It’s beyond infuriating!

Фото профиля Your Daily Post
Your Daily Post1 год назад

The Note Jim Carrey's Girlfriend Wrote Before She Took Her Own Life Is Absolutely Chilling: She blamed him for exposing her to a life of debauchery. Here is the full story 👇

Фото профиля alexasrewm
alexasrewm1 год назад

Bev is getting on my last nerve with this. I feel like it's 30x worse this trial.

Фото профиля 🇺🇸GenXGal🇺🇸
🇺🇸GenXGal🇺🇸1 год назад

Let’s call it what it is -Judge Canone is corrupt & in on this. I will die on this hill! Jen McCabe is insufferable & disgusting #KarenRead #JenMcCabe

Фото профиля Julie Sarrach
Julie Sarrach1 год назад

I think aj has had enough- they just approached as Bev just let Jen ramble on about her butt dialing John!! And Bev wouldn’t make her stop!! Jackson is mad!!!!!

Фото профиля Vague & Ambiguous
Vague & Ambiguous1 год назад

It’s the Canone Show. She’s going to show us how she wants all this to go.

Фото профиля MISS💋
MISS💋1 год назад

I am losing my shit over here. The judge clears her throat every time it gets hot. Jesus Christ is this real life

Фото профиля neonfriend
neonfriend1 год назад

We all have to take consolation in knowing that Judge Bev’s life will be forever changed. She won’t be able to step outside her door without someone asking her about the trial, or yelling “ Corrupt” at her or worse. I bet you will see her retire after this trial.

Фото профиля pezzanovante
pezzanovante1 год назад

Auntie Bev is corrupt as the day is long. That’s why.

Фото профиля Charlene
Charlene1 год назад

I don't even know what to say about this, Buttinsky Bev just interjected with no objection from either side, wow! Buttinsky Bev OBVIOUSLY has her own agenda in this case, and that's scary!

Похожие видео

Kerry Roberts complained about being a “victim” of “harassment” for “the crime of telling the truth” yesterday on Good Morning America. Then she took the witness stand & admitted to lying under oath & committing perjury at a grand jury to protect Jen McCabe. The Feds are the ONLY reason we know this information. What does that tell you? These witnesses are comfortable lying under oath at the state grand jury because they know they’ve got immunity from DA Michael Morrissey’s Office. They’re protected. But suddenly, once under investigation by the Feds, and under the threat of federal perjury charges while on the witness stand at a federal grand jury, a whole lot of admissions and truth started coming out. This is also why Brian Higgins testified (at the federal grand jury) that he saw someone, that fit John O’Keefe’s criteria, enter the house. Higgins didn’t know what the Feds knew at the time, and being an ATF agent, he’s surely well aware of the fact that he could be facing prison time for lying to a federal agent. The only reason Kerry Roberts changed her testimony and told the truth—that she never heard Karen Read ask Jen McCabe to Google anything—was because she knew she no longer had the protection of her friends at the federal grand jury. This is what the general public finds so outrageous about these “witnesses”. It’s how they brazenly lie to your face to frame an innocent woman for a murder she did not commit, and then if you dare call them on it, they have to make themselves “victims” by whining and crying about “hawassment” and “witness intimidation”. The public is going to be critical and unfavorable of you when you willingly lie to coverup and frame someone else for murder. That’s a necessary age-old aspect of society called “shame”. If you don’t like it, don’t lie or do shameful things. It’s really that simple. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

58,743 просмотров • 1 год назад

Judge Beverly Cannone is violating #KarenRead’s Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury by refusing to allow the very standard & typical practice of jury voir dire of the jury venire by the attorneys. Yesterday, Brother Counsel had his Brother Counsel, a national trial attorney who’s litigated in 25 states, on his show to get his fresh perspective on legal matters in the Karen Read case. I highly recommend checking out this show over on his YouTube channel (linked below). They discussed this issue of how the Judge isn’t allowing panel voir dire, or for the attorneys to be able to ask questions of prospective jurors to ensure the selection of a fair and impartial jury. Attorney Salomon advised that immediately after a jury’s empaneled and selection’s complete, he’d move for a mistrial, stating how the Judge is not allowing the defendant to have a fair trial, did not allow the attorneys to voir dire the jurors, and as a result, neither the defense attorneys, nor the prosecutor, nor the Judge has any clue whether they actually have a fair jury. I found Judge Cannone’s refusal to allow panel voir dire of the jury at the first trial troubling, and am once again troubled by this decision for the second trial. Judge Cannone has gone out of her way to acknowledge the extensive media coverage of and public interest in this case, and the effects that might have on Karen Read’s right to a fair trial and impartial jury. In fact, she recently issued a gag order with the expressed purposes of apparently trying to protect Karen Read’s right to a fair and impartial jury and trial. So my question is, if Judge Cannone truly cared about Karen Read’s right to an impartial jury and a fair trial, then why is she refusing to protect that right when it counts most—during the actual jury selection process? In a case with so much pretrial publicity—as repeatedly acknowledged by the Judge—it seems like the necessity of robust and effective jury voir dire by counsel is all the more imperative in ensuring Karen Read’s Sixth Amendment rights. These are the decisions that make it hard not to be left with the impression that Judge Cannone doesn’t actually care about Karen Read’s right to a fair trial or impartial jury, because if she did then she’d allow that to be possible through jury selection. These are the decisions that make it hard not to view Judge Cannone’s gag order as completely disingenuous when she says it’s in the name of protecting Karen Read’s rights to an impartial jury and fair trial, because if she really cared about that then she’d allow the attorneys to voir dire prospective jurors. In the end, it appears as though Cannone is only eager to exploit the whole facade of wanting to protect Read’s rights when it allows her to make decisions that further tie Karen Read and defense counsel’s hands behind their backs, but not when it *actually* counts. What say you? Should the defense move for a mistrial immediately upon the completion of jury selection? Do we really trust Judge Beverly Cannone to weed out any biased or partial jurors? #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

43,273 просмотров • 1 год назад