正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 BREAKING: Bessent Couldn't Name The Case. Asked what ongoing litigation prevents him from discussing Trump's audit status, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the matter was tied up in court. Then Rep. Linda Sánchez asked a simple follow-up: Which case? He couldn't name it. Sánchez pointed out that the... show more

Brian Allen

302,307 subscribers

208,435 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 BREAKING: Sánchez Came Prepared. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed ongoing litigation prevented him from answering questions about Trump's audit status. Then Rep. Linda Sánchez pulled out a court order and cited Supreme Court precedent saying ongoing litigation does not automatically bar testimony before Congress. 🔥 That's when the argument shifted. The debate was no longer about Trump's taxes. It was about whether "ongoing litigation" was a legitimate legal reason... or an excuse not to answer the question.

🚨 BREAKING: Sánchez Came Prepared. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed ongoing litigation prevented him from answering questions about Trump's audit status. Then Rep. Linda Sánchez pulled out a court order and cited Supreme Court precedent saying ongoing litigation does not automatically bar testimony before Congress. 🔥 That's when the argument shifted. The debate was no longer about Trump's taxes. It was about whether "ongoing litigation" was a legitimate legal reason... or an excuse not to answer the question.

Brian Allen

95,657 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: Bessent Wouldn't Answer The Hypothetical. Rep. Linda Sánchez asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent a simple question: If Joe Biden filed an amended tax return claiming the government owed him $1 billion, would that be audited? 🔥 Bessent refused to answer. That's what made the exchange notable. Sánchez wasn't really asking about Biden. She was testing whether the standard being applied to Trump would be applied to anyone else. And Bessent wouldn't engage.

🚨 BREAKING: Bessent Wouldn't Answer The Hypothetical. Rep. Linda Sánchez asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent a simple question: If Joe Biden filed an amended tax return claiming the government owed him $1 billion, would that be audited? 🔥 Bessent refused to answer. That's what made the exchange notable. Sánchez wasn't really asking about Biden. She was testing whether the standard being applied to Trump would be applied to anyone else. And Bessent wouldn't engage.

Brian Allen

68,098 次观看 • 2 个月前

#BREAKING: Hayes: “Acting AG Todd Blanche told Congress not to worry about the $1.8 billion slush fund for insurrectionists…The DOJ then told the court the same thing—don’t worry, it’s moot, it’s dropped, and then last week, the judge said okay, fine, put it in writing. She ordered Blanche and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and an associate AG to all sign ‘a declaration under the penalty of perjury, they will not take any action to create or operate the anti-weaponization fund and that the anti-weaponization fund will not proceed in any manner or under any name.’ Well, today was the deadline for that and guess what? They came back to the court and they said no, we’re NOT doing it. We’re NOT filing any declaration to officially kill the fund, which probably means the slush fund is NOT dead.”🙄🤦‍♀️

#BREAKING: Hayes: “Acting AG Todd Blanche told Congress not to worry about the $1.8 billion slush fund for insurrectionists…The DOJ then told the court the same thing—don’t worry, it’s moot, it’s dropped, and then last week, the judge said okay, fine, put it in writing. She ordered Blanche and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and an associate AG to all sign ‘a declaration under the penalty of perjury, they will not take any action to create or operate the anti-weaponization fund and that the anti-weaponization fund will not proceed in any manner or under any name.’ Well, today was the deadline for that and guess what? They came back to the court and they said no, we’re NOT doing it. We’re NOT filing any declaration to officially kill the fund, which probably means the slush fund is NOT dead.”🙄🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

527,388 次观看 • 2 个月前

Rep Ben Cline asks AG Pam Bondi why they're STILL enforcing a registration requirement, and the felony criminal penalties that come with it, for NFA items despite the "tax" being removed as of January 1st this year. She responds that it's "pending litigation" which is technically true. However, it's only true because her DOJ hasn't dropped their support of it in court. If they did then the registration and the "pending litigation" would just go away. It really is that simple... #NFA #PamBondi #AG #DOW #silencer #SBR #suppressors #OSHA #safety

Rep Ben Cline asks AG Pam Bondi why they're STILL enforcing a registration requirement, and the felony criminal penalties that come with it, for NFA items despite the "tax" being removed as of January 1st this year. She responds that it's "pending litigation" which is technically true. However, it's only true because her DOJ hasn't dropped their support of it in court. If they did then the registration and the "pending litigation" would just go away. It really is that simple... #NFA #PamBondi #AG #DOW #silencer #SBR #suppressors #OSHA #safety

Mrgunsngear

86,910 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 WTF?! President Trump reveals the woman who walked by the White House and sued him to block the ballroom national security project is also involved in OTHER litigation around DC Throw the case out! “She is highly litigious, a serial plaintiff, and said she was bothered in her walking by the White House, but didn't state her involvement in numerous places around D.C. Why then is she involved in litigation on other Developments in far distant parts of D.C. Is she walking there, too? How is she walking on a totally closed street at the Treasury Building — Nobody is allowed to walk there? She never saw a Building, because there is no Building there.“

🚨 WTF?! President Trump reveals the woman who walked by the White House and sued him to block the ballroom national security project is also involved in OTHER litigation around DC Throw the case out! “She is highly litigious, a serial plaintiff, and said she was bothered in her walking by the White House, but didn't state her involvement in numerous places around D.C. Why then is she involved in litigation on other Developments in far distant parts of D.C. Is she walking there, too? How is she walking on a totally closed street at the Treasury Building — Nobody is allowed to walk there? She never saw a Building, because there is no Building there.“

Eric Daugherty

712,275 次观看 • 2 个月前

Jennings: What lengths did the previous admin go to to tell the American people what happened with Epstein? Taylor: SDNY was still investigating the case. And the reports are that they were investigating potential coconspirators. And then the administration sent 20 people to get the files from S.D.N.Y. Then what did they do? They did a control-f, looked for trump's name. And then in July, they said, case is over, case closed. But wait, the case is back open tonight. Is that a coincidence or does it have to do with trump?

Jennings: What lengths did the previous admin go to to tell the American people what happened with Epstein? Taylor: SDNY was still investigating the case. And the reports are that they were investigating potential coconspirators. And then the administration sent 20 people to get the files from S.D.N.Y. Then what did they do? They did a control-f, looked for trump's name. And then in July, they said, case is over, case closed. But wait, the case is back open tonight. Is that a coincidence or does it have to do with trump?

Acyn

234,623 次观看 • 9 个月前

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

Overton

245,862 次观看 • 6 个月前

Simon Harris previously couldn't explain why a rapist was let into Ireland as he said he wasn't aware of the case. Asked again 4 weeks later he said "I don't have that information today tbh." "That's a matter for our immigration system & those who enforce it to speak to that."

Simon Harris previously couldn't explain why a rapist was let into Ireland as he said he wasn't aware of the case. Asked again 4 weeks later he said "I don't have that information today tbh." "That's a matter for our immigration system & those who enforce it to speak to that."

gript

152,792 次观看 • 1 年前

"I hope you get some social media clips.” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent calls out Rep. Linda Sánchez during a Ways and Means Committee hearing after the California Democrat pressed Bessent about potential IRS audits related to President Trump and his family. SÁNCHEZ: “I'm curious to know who counts as Trump's ‘family’ for the purposes of this immunity. Is it his children, his in-laws, his grandchildren, his second or third cousin? His great-great-grandchildren? Do you know the answer to that question, Mr. Secretary?” BESSENT: “Again, I imagine you have the Justice Department phone number. I suggest you call them.”

"I hope you get some social media clips.” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent calls out Rep. Linda Sánchez during a Ways and Means Committee hearing after the California Democrat pressed Bessent about potential IRS audits related to President Trump and his family. SÁNCHEZ: “I'm curious to know who counts as Trump's ‘family’ for the purposes of this immunity. Is it his children, his in-laws, his grandchildren, his second or third cousin? His great-great-grandchildren? Do you know the answer to that question, Mr. Secretary?” BESSENT: “Again, I imagine you have the Justice Department phone number. I suggest you call them.”

Fox News

291,990 次观看 • 2 个月前

JUST IN: A federal judge put Trump's $1.7 billion slush fund on notice. Judge Richard Leon pressed DOJ lawyers to put in writing that the fund isn't moving forward. When asked why they wouldn't, the DOJ's answer was: "I don't know." The fund survived today's hearing, but the judge delivered a pointed warning to the DOJ: if the administration is telling the court the fund is not moving forward, then it better not move forward. Scott MacFarlane reports.

JUST IN: A federal judge put Trump's $1.7 billion slush fund on notice. Judge Richard Leon pressed DOJ lawyers to put in writing that the fund isn't moving forward. When asked why they wouldn't, the DOJ's answer was: "I don't know." The fund survived today's hearing, but the judge delivered a pointed warning to the DOJ: if the administration is telling the court the fund is not moving forward, then it better not move forward. Scott MacFarlane reports.

MeidasTouch

142,927 次观看 • 2 个月前

WATCH: EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin gets in a heated exchange after stumping House Democrat Rep. Rosa DeLauro on landmark Supreme Court cases that she could not identify. “You’re upset that you don’t know what Loper Bright is,” Zeldin said, referring to the landmark Supreme Court case from 2024 that reshaped the power of regulatory agencies. “You know what the major policy doctrine is?” Zeldin asked. “You’re a member of Congress. You should know.”

WATCH: EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin gets in a heated exchange after stumping House Democrat Rep. Rosa DeLauro on landmark Supreme Court cases that she could not identify. “You’re upset that you don’t know what Loper Bright is,” Zeldin said, referring to the landmark Supreme Court case from 2024 that reshaped the power of regulatory agencies. “You know what the major policy doctrine is?” Zeldin asked. “You’re a member of Congress. You should know.”

Fox News

323,543 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 LMAO!! Scott Bessent physically pulled out a Washington Post story about Trump on the $250 bill and CALLED OUT their writers to their faces *Pulls out the story*: "Who here's from the post? Yeah, TERRIBLY written, TERRIVLY edited!" 😭 "Because basically what it says is that treasury is following the law, and that we've created the bill, and that it's up to Congress, but that we follow the bill and it's up to, I didn't really understand what the story was."

🚨 LMAO!! Scott Bessent physically pulled out a Washington Post story about Trump on the $250 bill and CALLED OUT their writers to their faces Pulls out the story: "Who here's from the post? Yeah, TERRIBLY written, TERRIVLY edited!" 😭 "Because basically what it says is that treasury is following the law, and that we've created the bill, and that it's up to Congress, but that we follow the bill and it's up to, I didn't really understand what the story was."

Eric Daugherty

1,341,285 次观看 • 2 个月前

▶️ #WATCH | CJP spokesperson Saurav Das Saurav Das talked about a public interest litigation (PIL) in Delhi High court against CJP. He addressed the gathering and said: ➡️ Early this morning, we received news that some person in the Delhi High Court, someone random, just any random person, some BJP or RSS worker has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). It states that there should be an NIA investigation against the Cockroach Janta Party and these andolanjeevis (protesters). Friends, Exactly, loser. ➡️ Friends, This is not a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). This is a Bharatiya Janata Party interest litigation. This is a Modi interest litigation. This is an Amit Shah interest litigation. ➡️ So, we would like to request the Delhi High Court with full respect. Our only plea is that you should not entertain such people. Do not let yourself be used as a political weapon. Listen to the people. Do not listen to such people who bring such petitions for their own agendas or for government work and call it a Public Interest Litigation. ➡️ Our High Court, our Supreme Court, are very important institutions; justice should happen there. But if a person comes to them who wants to give this issue a political color, who wants to get an order in favor of the government. ➡️ You might know that when our Sonam Wangchuk ji was picked up, what did the Delhi Police say? They said it was a Delhi High Court order, which is why they were taking him away. Watch on HNP NEWS 👇🏻 #CJP #NEET #NEETPaperLeak #SauravDas #Cockroach #Cockroaches #CockroachJantaParty #CJPProtest #CJPMovement #Students #StudentsProtest #GenZ #EducationMinister #DharmendraPradhan #NarendraModi #Modi #PMModi #Resignation #Resign #AbhijeetDipke #SonamWangchuk #Protest #HungerStrike #DelhiPolice #JantarMantar #Delhi

▶️ #WATCH | CJP spokesperson Saurav Das Saurav Das talked about a public interest litigation (PIL) in Delhi High court against CJP. He addressed the gathering and said: ➡️ Early this morning, we received news that some person in the Delhi High Court, someone random, just any random person, some BJP or RSS worker has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). It states that there should be an NIA investigation against the Cockroach Janta Party and these andolanjeevis (protesters). Friends, Exactly, loser. ➡️ Friends, This is not a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). This is a Bharatiya Janata Party interest litigation. This is a Modi interest litigation. This is an Amit Shah interest litigation. ➡️ So, we would like to request the Delhi High Court with full respect. Our only plea is that you should not entertain such people. Do not let yourself be used as a political weapon. Listen to the people. Do not listen to such people who bring such petitions for their own agendas or for government work and call it a Public Interest Litigation. ➡️ Our High Court, our Supreme Court, are very important institutions; justice should happen there. But if a person comes to them who wants to give this issue a political color, who wants to get an order in favor of the government. ➡️ You might know that when our Sonam Wangchuk ji was picked up, what did the Delhi Police say? They said it was a Delhi High Court order, which is why they were taking him away. Watch on HNP NEWS 👇🏻 #CJP #NEET #NEETPaperLeak #SauravDas #Cockroach #Cockroaches #CockroachJantaParty #CJPProtest #CJPMovement #Students #StudentsProtest #GenZ #EducationMinister #DharmendraPradhan #NarendraModi #Modi #PMModi #Resignation #Resign #AbhijeetDipke #SonamWangchuk #Protest #HungerStrike #DelhiPolice #JantarMantar #Delhi

HNP NEWS

800,774 次观看 • 1 个月前

JUST IN: This Is A Pretty Stunning Detail From The Kennedy Center Fight. Rep. Joyce Beatty says she was the only board member who tried to stop Trump's name from being placed on the Kennedy Center. According to Beatty, the proposal wasn't even on the agenda. She says she joined remotely, attempted to object, and was muted before she could make her case. Beatty challenged the move in court, arguing the Kennedy Center's governing law did not allow the institution to be renamed after Trump. This week, a federal judge agreed and ordered Trump's name removed. Tonight, workers are physically taking it down. That's the story. Not just that Trump's name is coming off the building. That the board member who says she was silenced ended up winning in court.

JUST IN: This Is A Pretty Stunning Detail From The Kennedy Center Fight. Rep. Joyce Beatty says she was the only board member who tried to stop Trump's name from being placed on the Kennedy Center. According to Beatty, the proposal wasn't even on the agenda. She says she joined remotely, attempted to object, and was muted before she could make her case. Beatty challenged the move in court, arguing the Kennedy Center's governing law did not allow the institution to be renamed after Trump. This week, a federal judge agreed and ordered Trump's name removed. Tonight, workers are physically taking it down. That's the story. Not just that Trump's name is coming off the building. That the board member who says she was silenced ended up winning in court.

Brian Allen

565,354 次观看 • 2 个月前

Good Morning X 🚨 FBI arrests husband & wife in (CA) running a Hospice fraud scheme, that racked up ($7M) over the course of several years Kudos to Nick Shirley, bc if not for him the media wouldn't be reporting on it We Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to audit Newsom he had to know

Good Morning X 🚨 FBI arrests husband & wife in (CA) running a Hospice fraud scheme, that racked up ($7M) over the course of several years Kudos to Nick Shirley, bc if not for him the media wouldn't be reporting on it We Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to audit Newsom he had to know

@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

81,623 次观看 • 4 个月前

BREAKING 🚨: Scott Jennings ENDS Bill Maher when he continues to try and manipulate what Trump said to fit his narrative. Bill Maher: “I mean Trump was asked ‘Do you have a duty to uphold the Constitution?’ and his answer was “I don’t know, I’m not a lawyer.’” Jennings: “But in the same breath he said, ‘On this case we have the best lawyers and we’re going to abide by what the Supreme Court said.’ That’s what his full statement was.”

BREAKING 🚨: Scott Jennings ENDS Bill Maher when he continues to try and manipulate what Trump said to fit his narrative. Bill Maher: “I mean Trump was asked ‘Do you have a duty to uphold the Constitution?’ and his answer was “I don’t know, I’m not a lawyer.’” Jennings: “But in the same breath he said, ‘On this case we have the best lawyers and we’re going to abide by what the Supreme Court said.’ That’s what his full statement was.”

Dr Charlie Ward

738,970 次观看 • 1 个月前

Police Broke Down Door in Mistaken Identity Case in Baton Rouge Officers asked for Brooks’ name. He refused to answer and asked them to get off his property. The video shows officers following him, kicking open his door, and detaining him. Shortly after, the officers put Brooks in handcuffs. He said he then told officers his name, and that is when they realized they had the wrong person. “What took place was, you were mistaken for someone else. We got a call that said the person that we were looking for was at this house, and when they pulled up, you looked just like that person,” another officer said.

Police Broke Down Door in Mistaken Identity Case in Baton Rouge Officers asked for Brooks’ name. He refused to answer and asked them to get off his property. The video shows officers following him, kicking open his door, and detaining him. Shortly after, the officers put Brooks in handcuffs. He said he then told officers his name, and that is when they realized they had the wrong person. “What took place was, you were mistaken for someone else. We got a call that said the person that we were looking for was at this house, and when they pulled up, you looked just like that person,” another officer said.

American Crime Stories

15,630 次观看 • 3 个月前

After President Trump said, “Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we will have to blow them up,” in regard to the Strait of Hormuz, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he had a call with the Omani ambassador and was assured that there were no plans for tolling the strait. “As he said, our countries have had 200 years of good relations,” Bessent said. “He wants to have another 200 more.”

After President Trump said, “Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we will have to blow them up,” in regard to the Strait of Hormuz, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he had a call with the Omani ambassador and was assured that there were no plans for tolling the strait. “As he said, our countries have had 200 years of good relations,” Bessent said. “He wants to have another 200 more.”

CBS News

35,461 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 DJ Akademiks Breaks Down Alleged Funding For Alleged Victims Behind Lawsuits Against Stake, Drake, Adin Ross & Himself 👀⚖️ DJ Akademiks is examining recent federal court filings in the lawsuit involving Drake, Stake, himself and other defendants, focusing specifically on a newly filed third-party litigation funding disclosure. According to Akademiks, the plaintiff disclosed that he entered into a litigation funding agreement with Poleg LLC, which allegedly provided a forgivable loan to cover legal fees. The filing reportedly states that repayment of the loan is contingent on the plaintiff recovering more than the amount provided. 🗣️ DJ Akademiks: “The plaintiff has entered into a litigation funding agreement with Poleg LLC, the funder.” Akademiks then began tracing the business relationships surrounding Poleg LLC, including reported connections involving Tamir Poleg and Insight Partners. He also pointed to previous investment relationships involving Insight Partners, Fanatics, Jay-Z and Roc Nation, raising questions about whether there could be a broader financial connection behind the litigation. 👀 Akademiks questioned how a plaintiff who allegedly claims to have suffered financial losses could afford multiple attorneys while simultaneously pursuing a major federal case against billion-dollar entities. Akademiks says the newly disclosed litigation-funding agreement provides a starting point for journalists and investigators to examine the money trail more closely. 🔎 The bigger question: Who ultimately provided the money behind the litigation funding, and what if any connections exist between the funder and the parties Akademiks referenced? 👀 Do you think the funding disclosure raises legitimate questions?

🚨 DJ Akademiks Breaks Down Alleged Funding For Alleged Victims Behind Lawsuits Against Stake, Drake, Adin Ross & Himself 👀⚖️ DJ Akademiks is examining recent federal court filings in the lawsuit involving Drake, Stake, himself and other defendants, focusing specifically on a newly filed third-party litigation funding disclosure. According to Akademiks, the plaintiff disclosed that he entered into a litigation funding agreement with Poleg LLC, which allegedly provided a forgivable loan to cover legal fees. The filing reportedly states that repayment of the loan is contingent on the plaintiff recovering more than the amount provided. 🗣️ DJ Akademiks: “The plaintiff has entered into a litigation funding agreement with Poleg LLC, the funder.” Akademiks then began tracing the business relationships surrounding Poleg LLC, including reported connections involving Tamir Poleg and Insight Partners. He also pointed to previous investment relationships involving Insight Partners, Fanatics, Jay-Z and Roc Nation, raising questions about whether there could be a broader financial connection behind the litigation. 👀 Akademiks questioned how a plaintiff who allegedly claims to have suffered financial losses could afford multiple attorneys while simultaneously pursuing a major federal case against billion-dollar entities. Akademiks says the newly disclosed litigation-funding agreement provides a starting point for journalists and investigators to examine the money trail more closely. 🔎 The bigger question: Who ultimately provided the money behind the litigation funding, and what if any connections exist between the funder and the parties Akademiks referenced? 👀 Do you think the funding disclosure raises legitimate questions?

Cousin Tino ™️

11,570 次观看 • 5 天前