Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

BREAKING: 🇨🇳🇹🇼 China has mysteriously stopped sending warplanes into Taiwan’s sensitive air zone for 7 days, its longest pause since monitoring began. The move comes amid rising global tensions and key political developments, while Taiwan reports no major change in maritime activity. Analysts say the unexplained silence raises questions...

1,440,733 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

New: Why Should We Care if China Dominates Maritime East Asia? In Episode 163, Ray Powell and Jim speak with retired U.S. Navy Captain Brent D. Sadler, a career submariner, former U.S. defense attaché in Malaysia, Heritage Foundation Senior Fellow and author of two books: U.S. Naval Power in the 21st Century and Naval Power in Action: Seizing the Initiative in the New Cold War with China. Sadler’s answer is blunt: China is exercising growing control over maritime East Asia, as Beijing has spent decades building the military, commercial, and political leverage to do exactly that. He says this is not just a question of aircraft carriers, missiles, and hull counts, but also about China’s strategic commercial footprint in ports, shipping and repair infrastructure, distant-water fishing fleets, maritime militia, and the China Coast Guard. Ray and Jim ask what it means that China’s coast guard vessels are operating east of Taiwan. Are these deployments preparation for a possible blockade? Why are fishing fleets moving in organized formations? And how could Beijing use gray-zone coercion to change the status quo before anyone agrees that a crisis has begun? The conversation also examines the recent China-Russia naval exercises and potential for submarine technology transfer, Russian pressure on Japan around the Kuril Islands, and Beijing’s efforts to turn even limited naval interactions with countries such as Indonesia into political and propaganda victories. Sadler explains why Southeast Asian leaders’ rhetoric must be weighed against what matters on the water: maritime rights, military exercises, commercial ties, and freedom of navigation. Finally, Sadler assesses the military balance approaching the much-discussed 2027 window of war concerns, China’s Taiwan contingency preparations, gaps in America’s carrier presence in the Indo-Pacific, U.S. shipbuilding deficits, the future of unmanned vessels, and what Ukraine’s drone war may mean for Taiwan and regional partners. Sadler’s larger warning is that maritime control is no longer just a contest of fleets, but a contest of coercion, commerce, access, and political will; one in which Beijing can test regional governments, reshape behavior below the threshold of war, and learn whether America and its allies will respond before temporary pressure becomes a permanent advantage. Links to the full episode below.

Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod

17,222 views • 1 month ago

“China is the big prize. China will be the final goal of this whole regime change process which started after 9/11.” With this warning, Hussein Askary (Hussein Askary) of the Belt & Road Institute in Sweden frames today’s global tensions as part of a long-term Western strategy to preserve a fading unipolar order by suppressing the rise of a multipolar world led by China, Russia, and the Global South. Askary argues that Iran is now the central battleground in this struggle—not because of its nuclear program, but because of its pivotal role in the emerging economic and strategic architecture. Iran has entrenched itself in China’s Belt and Road Initiative, joined BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and expanded its regional influence despite decades of sanctions. These developments, he contends, cast Iran as a strategic threat to Western hegemony. He claims that the U.S., Britain, and Israel—backed by powerful intelligence networks and financial elites—have little interest in peace or stability in West Asia. Their strategy, he says, is to generate sustained instability in regions like the Middle East to block the rise of competing powers. While leaders like Netanyahu aim to eliminate regional rivals, Anglo-American strategists see Iran as the last remaining independent actor in what some Western planners label the “black curse.” The broader goal, according to Askary, is regime change in Iran, its fragmentation along ethnic lines, and a chain of destabilization extending through Pakistan, Central Asia, and Russia—culminating in an effort to contain or dismantle China’s global influence. Unless this agenda is stopped, Askary warns, it could spiral into global confrontation—even thermonuclear war.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

212,755 views • 1 year ago

‼️🇨🇳🇹🇼 BIG | Taiwan is deploying an aggressive new asymmetric defense shield across the Taiwan Strait—unleashing a fleet of high-tech sea drones backed by American technology to permanently derail China’s maritime expansion. In a massive tactical leap, the Taiwanese government has officially greenlit the procurement of dozens of uncrewed vessels for its Coast Guard, as reported by Nikkei Asia. The high-stakes defense package includes 25 uncrewed surface vessels (USVs) and two unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) to be developed by the National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology (NCSIST). Crucially, Taipei is directly tapping into American defense expertise, partnering with U.S.-based Maritime Tactical Systems (MARTAC) to build a highly lethal, autonomous swarm capable of locking down the strait and monitoring or intercepting the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) in real-time. This contract marks a brilliant strategic evolution that adapts the devastating maritime drone lessons of the Black Sea to the defense of Taiwan. By integrating cutting-edge U.S. drone tech into its frontline Coast Guard, Taipei is effectively transforming its gray-zone defense into an un-navigable minefield for Chinese warships. This move signals to Beijing that any attempt to enforce a naval blockade or execute a surprise amphibious assault will be met by an invisible, relentless swarm of kamikaze and surveillance drones—proving that Taiwan’s defense strategy is getting sharper, faster, and completely optimized for high-tech attrition. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

68,360 views • 2 months ago

#BREAKING 🇮🇳 🇮🇱 🇦🇫 Indian-Operated Israeli Heron Drone Goes Down Inside Afghanistan, Questions Mount A drone crashed on the outskirts of Maidan Shahr, the provincial capital of Maidan Wardak province in Afghanistan. Visual evidence from the site suggests the unmanned aerial vehicle closely matches the Israeli-manufactured Heron UAV The drone crashed nearly 200 kilometers deep inside Afghanistan, in a highly sensitive area. This raises a critical question: who was operating it? In the region, India is the only country which operate these drones, leading to serious concerns about whether Afghan sovereignty has effectively been ceded to India and Indian drones are operating from Afghan territory. Several questions have also emerged in light of recent drone attacks launched from Afghanistan into Tajikistan, further intensifying regional security concerns. Defense analysts have additionally highlighted another destabilizing development in the region: foreign-backed protests currently underway in Iran, with Indian and Afghan social media networks actively participating in campaigns against Tehran. This has led to growing speculation over a possible connection between these developments. Analysts are now questioning whether the presence of Indian-operated Israeli Heron drones in Afghanistan has any linkage to the evolving situation in Iran and the broader regional destabilization strategy. The Heron UAV, developed by Israel Aerospace Industries, features advanced electro-optical sensors, long endurance exceeding 40 hours, and capabilities for high-altitude operations. India remains the primary operator of this model in South Asia, having integrated multiple Heron variants into its armed forces since the early 2000s. Reports indicate India has expanded its fleet, including the Heron Mk-II, for border surveillance along contested frontiers. Such drones provide real-time intelligence, making them valuable assets in monitoring vast terrains amid complex geopolitical environments.

Eagle Eye

98,488 views • 9 months ago

🇨🇳🇹🇼 The most dangerous part of a Taiwan war may be China’s ability to turn huge parts of its civilian economy into part of the war effort almost overnight. Taiwan has been drilling for the possibility that routine Chinese pressure could suddenly become a real attack, while Beijing continues near-daily air and naval activity around the island and practices blockade-style operations. If war actually began, China’s advantage would not just be the PLA. Its revised mobilization framework allows Beijing to redirect industry, transport, energy, communications, healthcare and private resources toward wartime priorities. That means civilian factories could be repurposed for drones, vehicles, electronics, spare parts and munitions. Commercial shipyards and transport networks could be folded into military logistics. China’s huge technology workforce could be redirected toward cyber operations, intelligence, electronic warfare and network defense. And its population gives Beijing an enormous pool for reserve forces, logistics, engineering, medical support and replacement manpower. That creates a brutal problem for Taiwan. Taiwan has around 23 million people and very little strategic depth. China has the world’s largest manufacturing base and a population of roughly 1.4 billion. Even with U.S. help, the war would quickly become about more than who has the better missiles or aircraft. It would become a race over who can replace losses faster. The U.S. would be fighting across the Pacific, dependent on long supply lines and forward bases, while China would be operating next to its own factories, ports and transport networks. Washington would also have to replace expensive missiles, aircraft components and naval losses while protecting bases from Chinese strikes. China, meanwhile, could potentially keep feeding the conflict with huge volumes of cheaper drones, missiles, electronics, ships, vehicles and personnel. None of that makes a Chinese victory automatic. An amphibious invasion of Taiwan would still be extraordinarily difficult, and U.S. intervention could impose enormous costs. But China’s sheer ability to convert civilian economic power into military output could become one of the decisive factors. The real nightmare for Taiwan is therefore not just surviving the first wave. It is surviving a war where China can keep replacing what it loses at a scale Taiwan, and potentially even the U.S., would struggle to match. Writer: Mhedi

Mario Nawfal

51,386 views • 14 days ago

BREAKING NEWS !! Rumours in top circles of the PLA ! The Promise is soon to be Fulfilled! China is preparing to take TAIWAN! The Date is set ! In October 2027, China’s long-anticipated reunification with Taiwan, a goal rooted in historical inevitability since the 1949 retreat of Chiang Kai-shek, unfolds with a meticulously planned military campaign. Chiang, defeated by Mao Zedong’s Communist forces, fled to Taiwan, establishing what Beijing considers an illegitimate separatist regime. Since Hong Kong’s return in 1997, whispers of China’s resolve to reclaim Taiwan have grown louder, culminating in a decisive operation that showcases the People’s Liberation Army (PLA)’s unparalleled strength and strategic foresight. China’s military, the world’s largest by personnel with over 2.6 million active troops, has undergone transformative modernization since the 1990s. By 2027, the PLA is a global powerhouse, boasting advanced technology, integrated joint operations, and a robust logistical network. The campaign begins with a multi-domain assault, leveraging the PLA’s strengths across air, sea, cyber, and space domains. The PLA Navy (PLAN), now the largest globally with over 400 ships, including three aircraft carriers like the Type 003 Fujian, deploys a blockade around Taiwan’s 36,000 km² island, cutting off external supply lines. Destroyers like the Type 055, equipped with 112 vertical launch systems, dominate the Taiwan Strait, while submarines encircle key ports, neutralizing any naval resistance. The PLA Air Force (PLAAF), with over 3,000 aircraft, including 500 J-20 stealth fighters, achieves air superiority within hours. Precision strikes from hypersonic missiles, such as the DF-17, target Taiwan’s air defenses and command centers. Simultaneously, the PLA Rocket Force unleashes a barrage of ballistic and cruise missiles, with the DF-21D “carrier killer” ensuring no foreign naval intervention, particularly from the U.S., disrupts the operation. Cyberwarfare units cripple Taiwan’s communication networks, sowing confusion while propaganda broadcasts China’s narrative of peaceful reunification to deter resistance. Ground operations follow, with the PLA’s Eastern Theater Command, responsible for Taiwan, deploying 300,000 troops. Amphibious assault ships, like the Type 075, ferry elite marines across the 180-km strait, supported by hovercraft and landing craft. The PLA’s integrated joint operations ensure seamless coordination, with drones like the WZ-10 providing real-time intelligence. Taiwan’s rugged terrain and urban centers, like Taipei, pose challenges, but the PLA’s overwhelming numbers and advanced equipment, including Type 99A tanks and Z-20 helicopters, overpower defensive positions. China’s emphasis on rapid dominance minimizes prolonged urban warfare, preserving Taiwan’s infrastructure for post-conflict integration. Psychological operations play a critical role. The PLA broadcasts messages of unity, emphasizing Taiwan as an inalienable part of China, echoing Mao’s vision of a unified nation. Leaflets and digital campaigns highlight the futility of resistance, encouraging defections. China’s global diplomatic efforts, bolstered by its Belt and Road Initiative, ensure minimal international backlash. Key allies, like Russia, provide tacit support, while economic leverage over smaller nations secures their silence. By late October, Taiwan’s defences collapse. The PLA establishes control over key cities, with minimal civilian casualties due to precision tactics. Beijing frames the operation as a restoration of sovereignty, not conquest, aligning with its historical narrative. The campaign, executed with disciplined efficiency, fulfils China’s long-standing commitment to reunification, cementing its status as a global superpower. Taiwan, once Chiang’s refuge, is reintegrated, marking a new chapter in China’s ascent, rooted in Mao’s legacy and the PLA’s unmatched prowess. BOOKMARK THIS !!!

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺 🇷🇸🇮🇪

416,920 views • 1 year ago