BREAKING: Colorado school board votes to classify BLM and Pride flags as “government speech,” sparking legal and parental backlash.

More here:

Ecclesiastes 1:15-"The perverse are hard to be corrected, and the number of fools is infinite." At this point, they'll have to fired, or investigated and arrested. They refuse to do the correct thing, and tells you all you need to know.

@realDailyWire What government? Not MY government. My government is 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸.

Rigged elections have consequences.

@realDailyWire You get what you deserve Colorado. You wanted to become Cali jr? Enjoy what’s coming for you. Look at the wreck California is. You are next.

This isn't about inclusivity; it's about indoctrination. Schools are supposed to be places of learning, not battlegrounds for political agendas. When did it become acceptable for government officials to decide which ideologies are worthy of display? This selective endorsement of speech by the government is a direct affront to the very principles of neutrality and fairness our schools should uphold.

@realDailyWire If you can't mix religion and school! You sure as hell shouldn't be able to mix Pride/BLM and school!

"The Democratic Party's actions had left many U.S. citizens feeling humiliated. Signs of a Trump victory were proclaimed well before Biden withdrew from the race. The voters had had enough." 📝 @KarinaLMariani

@realDailyWire Huh, so it WAS gubbermint the whole time!

Stop federal funding of these schools.

The Supreme Court in 2004 or so decided to designate local governmental board meetings as "limited" public fora. We went hundreds of years where a citizens voice was not chilled and then in 2004 the ice rinks began freezing where today many of them are empty of skaters. Someone, smarter than me needs to visit every states Open Meeting Laws. The Dems use this to suppress and chill speech. Here is an example. In NY, the Committee on Open Gov states that b/c the law is silent on public participation a citizen doesn't have a right to speak at a local board meeting. It's a fairy tale. The reason why the NY OML is silent is because under the NY State Constitution, (NY Home Rule) the legislature is barred from interfering in local governmental affairs, thus it cannot speak on the conduct of the public or the law would have been found unconstitutional. I have a 1st case in front of Judge Karas in the 2d and am arguing this although I feel it is irrelevant in an anonymity claim but bit on the apple in the defenses motion to dismiss. NY thinks they can collect names and addresses in order for a member of the public to speak. This is how NY maintains its Dem power, it suppresses speech. For true change to happen across the country the floors of local government cannot be ice rinks of empty skaters. God bless.