Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

BREAKING: Did Polymarket just silently nuke the 500ms taker delay? Rumor has it the speed bump on crypto markets is GONE. No announcement, no changelog, nothing. The crazy part? It was never officially documented in the first place. I literally only found proof of its existence buried in a...

k1rallik's profile picture

BuBBliK

21,725 subscribers

110,516 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологииФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Sundar Pichai explains Google Search latency budgets: "I’ve always internalized speed as one of the distinguishing features of a great product. It almost always reflects the technical underpinnings of the product having been done well. It's easy to say you want low latency, but you're constantly adding capabilities. The capability frontier is progressing. That's where it gets more complicated. But to give an example, Search they now have latency budgets, in the milliseconds. If you ship something which shaves off three milliseconds, you earn 1.5 milliseconds for your latency budget, and 1.5 milliseconds gets passed onto the user. Depending on what we think you're doing, some people may get a latency budget of 30 milliseconds or 10 milliseconds. That's how much we think it matters." Sundar Pichai Elad Gil John Collison
1:05

Sundar Pichai explains Google Search latency budgets: "I’ve always internalized speed as one of the distinguishing features of a great product. It almost always reflects the technical underpinnings of the product having been done well. It's easy to say you want low latency, but you're constantly adding capabilities. The capability frontier is progressing. That's where it gets more complicated. But to give an example, Search they now have latency budgets, in the milliseconds. If you ship something which shaves off three milliseconds, you earn 1.5 milliseconds for your latency budget, and 1.5 milliseconds gets passed onto the user. Depending on what we think you're doing, some people may get a latency budget of 30 milliseconds or 10 milliseconds. That's how much we think it matters." Sundar Pichai Elad Gil John Collison

Stripe

23,879 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The value of the work we're doing at Optimum is encapsulated quite well by the phrase "speed is money". In modern markets there are real economic advantages to latency reduction. This is nothing new. Wall Street firms have long been optimizing on latency, primarily through colocation and top of the line hardware. However, when it comes to decentralized systems, expensive hardware and geographic concentration are antithetical to their purpose. Therefore we should optimize decentralized network latency through software, which I'm thrilled about because it's exactly what I've spent the better part of the past 2 decades working on with Random Linear Network Coding. Now let’s talk about networking economics, the relationship between speed and money. First, it's important to note that users will only pay for low latency if it can be consistently guaranteed. Second, you can only make that latency guarantee for a certain number of users. This is a universal law of networking. We can model this relationship on a delay curve, shown below. The delay curve is determined by the utilization rate of the network, meaning how much traffic is flowing through the network divided by the network's throughput. As you approach a level of traffic equal to the available throughput, latency trends infinitely higher. On this delay curve we can impose some utility thresholds. These thresholds are the levels of latency which are important to different groups of users because of how that latency guarantee improves their economic outcomes. Finding the point on the curve where each threshold intersects will tell us what level of traffic we can guarantee that level of latency for. Essentially, there exists a finite supply of speed on a network and the highest utility users of that speed are willing to pay more for it. I like to think of this similarly to expedited shipping options on Amazon. This is why we say speed is money, and why we can create a Latency Marketplace. The only way to increase the supply of speed is to fundamentally increase network throughput. This is what we work on at Optimum by using Random Linear Network Coding. The same relationship between traffic and throughput still applies, but now the delay curve is shifted out further to the right. Now more traffic can be processed at the same latency, or the same traffic can be processed at a lower latency. More speed available to the network. More value unlocked for the network’s users. Crucially, that value is no longer only reserved for those who can afford to sit closest to the machine. Expanding the supply of speed widens who can reach each latency threshold, keeping the network's advantage decentralized rather than concentrated in the hands of a few. When nodes join Optimum and participate, they reap the benefits, but they also add to the capacity. Rather than vying against each other in a zero-sum game, nodes help themselves and others.
0:54

The value of the work we're doing at Optimum is encapsulated quite well by the phrase "speed is money". In modern markets there are real economic advantages to latency reduction. This is nothing new. Wall Street firms have long been optimizing on latency, primarily through colocation and top of the line hardware. However, when it comes to decentralized systems, expensive hardware and geographic concentration are antithetical to their purpose. Therefore we should optimize decentralized network latency through software, which I'm thrilled about because it's exactly what I've spent the better part of the past 2 decades working on with Random Linear Network Coding. Now let’s talk about networking economics, the relationship between speed and money. First, it's important to note that users will only pay for low latency if it can be consistently guaranteed. Second, you can only make that latency guarantee for a certain number of users. This is a universal law of networking. We can model this relationship on a delay curve, shown below. The delay curve is determined by the utilization rate of the network, meaning how much traffic is flowing through the network divided by the network's throughput. As you approach a level of traffic equal to the available throughput, latency trends infinitely higher. On this delay curve we can impose some utility thresholds. These thresholds are the levels of latency which are important to different groups of users because of how that latency guarantee improves their economic outcomes. Finding the point on the curve where each threshold intersects will tell us what level of traffic we can guarantee that level of latency for. Essentially, there exists a finite supply of speed on a network and the highest utility users of that speed are willing to pay more for it. I like to think of this similarly to expedited shipping options on Amazon. This is why we say speed is money, and why we can create a Latency Marketplace. The only way to increase the supply of speed is to fundamentally increase network throughput. This is what we work on at Optimum by using Random Linear Network Coding. The same relationship between traffic and throughput still applies, but now the delay curve is shifted out further to the right. Now more traffic can be processed at the same latency, or the same traffic can be processed at a lower latency. More speed available to the network. More value unlocked for the network’s users. Crucially, that value is no longer only reserved for those who can afford to sit closest to the machine. Expanding the supply of speed widens who can reach each latency threshold, keeping the network's advantage decentralized rather than concentrated in the hands of a few. When nodes join Optimum and participate, they reap the benefits, but they also add to the capacity. Rather than vying against each other in a zero-sum game, nodes help themselves and others.

Muriel Medard

45,088 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The bots that were robbing you on 5-minute markets just got taxed out For months you were trading against code that saw the ending first It watched the Chainlink feed directly Knew the resolution 2-15 seconds before the screen updated Front-ran every click you made Then Polymarket changed one thing A dynamic fee that scales with how fast and mechanical your trade is The bot's whole game was speed Now speed costs money The free lunch is gone What's left is the part you can actually win A $800 Bitcoin drop still panics the Up contract to 12¢ Except now nobody's beating you to it with a faster server The next five minutes are readable again The edge stopped belonging to whoever had the fastest machine It belongs to whoever reads the move Did the bots scare you off these markets - or did you never get to find out?
3:57

The bots that were robbing you on 5-minute markets just got taxed out For months you were trading against code that saw the ending first It watched the Chainlink feed directly Knew the resolution 2-15 seconds before the screen updated Front-ran every click you made Then Polymarket changed one thing A dynamic fee that scales with how fast and mechanical your trade is The bot's whole game was speed Now speed costs money The free lunch is gone What's left is the part you can actually win A $800 Bitcoin drop still panics the Up contract to 12¢ Except now nobody's beating you to it with a faster server The next five minutes are readable again The edge stopped belonging to whoever had the fastest machine It belongs to whoever reads the move Did the bots scare you off these markets - or did you never get to find out?

Gorynich☄️

52,463 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Why is nobody talking about Polymarket's official API? You open Polymarket Wait for it to load... Click on a market... Wait again... Try to check another one... More waiting... By the time you see the price, it's already stale The opportunity moved while you were clicking through pages Someone else got there first There's a better way // Found the gem hiding in plain sight - library py-clob-client Official from Polymarket. MIT license I spent a week working with multiple markets Checking prices across different positions Monitoring various categories Tracking market movements Then discovered this library Game changer for workflow efficiency // Real example from last week: UI approach: Checking markets one by one through the interface API approach: Monitoring all relevant markets simultaneously with live updates Having comprehensive real-time data makes a meaningful difference Speed and information clarity are valuable advantages // Want to go deeper? Build an arbitrage bot You'll need Rust for execution speed Deploy the server geographically close to Polymarket's infrastructure Every millisecond counts when opportunities last 1-2 seconds. I built mine in Go for monitoring and analysis. Works great for that. But if you're hunting arbitrage at scale against other bots, Rust + low latency setup is the only way. The infrastructure race is real // "But I can't code" With today's AI tools you actually can Cursor, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Kimi, Grok - they write code for you You just describe what you want AI generates it You copy-paste and run Join Polymarket to create: Programming is no longer a barrier Anyone can build now
0:23

Why is nobody talking about Polymarket's official API? You open Polymarket Wait for it to load... Click on a market... Wait again... Try to check another one... More waiting... By the time you see the price, it's already stale The opportunity moved while you were clicking through pages Someone else got there first There's a better way // Found the gem hiding in plain sight - library py-clob-client Official from Polymarket. MIT license I spent a week working with multiple markets Checking prices across different positions Monitoring various categories Tracking market movements Then discovered this library Game changer for workflow efficiency // Real example from last week: UI approach: Checking markets one by one through the interface API approach: Monitoring all relevant markets simultaneously with live updates Having comprehensive real-time data makes a meaningful difference Speed and information clarity are valuable advantages // Want to go deeper? Build an arbitrage bot You'll need Rust for execution speed Deploy the server geographically close to Polymarket's infrastructure Every millisecond counts when opportunities last 1-2 seconds. I built mine in Go for monitoring and analysis. Works great for that. But if you're hunting arbitrage at scale against other bots, Rust + low latency setup is the only way. The infrastructure race is real // "But I can't code" With today's AI tools you actually can Cursor, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Kimi, Grok - they write code for you You just describe what you want AI generates it You copy-paste and run Join Polymarket to create: Programming is no longer a barrier Anyone can build now

BuBBliK

44,204 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Yesterday i publicly deposited $100 to a new wallet and asked Claude Fable 5 to double it on risk free arbitrage. Today it's sitting at $1,787.21 made overnight. I went through every code line and was shocked. It used just one formula to make 17x in one day: YES + NO Run the bot on a VPS close to the exchange instead of your laptop > Keep WebSocket connections alive instead of reconnecting every loop > Cache market metadata in memory and only update prices > Prepare both orders before the opportunity exists That last one changed everything. Most bots see YES + NO < $1, then build the trade. Mine already has the orders ready. When the spread appears, it only checks liquidity and submits both legs. No rebuilding. No unnecessary calculations. Just execution. Will you beat firms with million-dollar low-latency infrastructure? Probably not. But you don't need to. Most developers lose opportunities long before network latency becomes the bottleneck. They lose them inside their own code. Claude Fable 5 didn't give me a smarter strategy. It taught me how to stop wasting milliseconds. And in arbitrage, that's often the only edge that matters. Make sure to explain it to Claude if you wanna rebuild the same one. Leaving a full guide with every aspect covered below.
0:43

Yesterday i publicly deposited $100 to a new wallet and asked Claude Fable 5 to double it on risk free arbitrage. Today it's sitting at $1,787.21 made overnight. I went through every code line and was shocked. It used just one formula to make 17x in one day: YES + NO Run the bot on a VPS close to the exchange instead of your laptop > Keep WebSocket connections alive instead of reconnecting every loop > Cache market metadata in memory and only update prices > Prepare both orders before the opportunity exists That last one changed everything. Most bots see YES + NO < $1, then build the trade. Mine already has the orders ready. When the spread appears, it only checks liquidity and submits both legs. No rebuilding. No unnecessary calculations. Just execution. Will you beat firms with million-dollar low-latency infrastructure? Probably not. But you don't need to. Most developers lose opportunities long before network latency becomes the bottleneck. They lose them inside their own code. Claude Fable 5 didn't give me a smarter strategy. It taught me how to stop wasting milliseconds. And in arbitrage, that's often the only edge that matters. Make sure to explain it to Claude if you wanna rebuild the same one. Leaving a full guide with every aspect covered below.

Oracle Boar

102,357 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

In 2026, 90% of all Polymarket profits will be taken by Python scripts.. And this is not a prediction. It’s already happening. So if you think political pundits and sports gurus are making profits in these areas, let me be the bearer of bad news. Studies have revealed that merely “16% of users are profitable.” More importantly, “most of these users are not human.” How bots are exactly taking your money: Speed. One bot made $313 into $438K in a month. It’s a simple trick: the bot would look at the btc price a few seconds before the price update on Polymarket by checking the price on Binance. There’s no strategy or intelligence involved: simply beating the latency of the system. Risk-Free Arbitrage It looks for markets where "YES + NO" equals less than $1. "94 cents," for example. The bot buys both sides of the market and makes off with 6 cents guaranteed. This occurs thousands of times daily. Not gambling but math. Stream parsing. In esports, the script is faster than the blink of an eye when parsing the stream for games like Dota 2 and League of Legends. A team fight appears on the screen. The bot has already placed its bets on the winner using the old odds. What is meant by the turning point of 2026? Dynamic fees were introduced on Polymarket to get rid of simple bots. But what happened? The difficulty level on this marketplace simply increased. Today, it is not only fast scripts that win. Full-on AI robots have joined this game. They read news and respond to certain events within a millisecond. But here comes the painful part: barrier to entry is dirt cheap. Virtual private servers for $60 per month. Libraries written in Python waiting on GitHub. But here’s the thing: You don’t have to create a bot of your own. All you have to do is copy those which are already winning. PolyCop helps you to track the most profitable wallets and replicate their trades automatically. No code. No infrastructure. Just tap into the wallets that are already dominating. → Copy the winners: Humans deal on intuition and vibes. Bots play on numbers and network latency. In this game, "intuition" always loses against "code." You have two choices here. You could learn how to code or you could “copy” people who have done it before you
0:29

In 2026, 90% of all Polymarket profits will be taken by Python scripts.. And this is not a prediction. It’s already happening. So if you think political pundits and sports gurus are making profits in these areas, let me be the bearer of bad news. Studies have revealed that merely “16% of users are profitable.” More importantly, “most of these users are not human.” How bots are exactly taking your money: Speed. One bot made $313 into $438K in a month. It’s a simple trick: the bot would look at the btc price a few seconds before the price update on Polymarket by checking the price on Binance. There’s no strategy or intelligence involved: simply beating the latency of the system. Risk-Free Arbitrage It looks for markets where "YES + NO" equals less than $1. "94 cents," for example. The bot buys both sides of the market and makes off with 6 cents guaranteed. This occurs thousands of times daily. Not gambling but math. Stream parsing. In esports, the script is faster than the blink of an eye when parsing the stream for games like Dota 2 and League of Legends. A team fight appears on the screen. The bot has already placed its bets on the winner using the old odds. What is meant by the turning point of 2026? Dynamic fees were introduced on Polymarket to get rid of simple bots. But what happened? The difficulty level on this marketplace simply increased. Today, it is not only fast scripts that win. Full-on AI robots have joined this game. They read news and respond to certain events within a millisecond. But here comes the painful part: barrier to entry is dirt cheap. Virtual private servers for $60 per month. Libraries written in Python waiting on GitHub. But here’s the thing: You don’t have to create a bot of your own. All you have to do is copy those which are already winning. PolyCop helps you to track the most profitable wallets and replicate their trades automatically. No code. No infrastructure. Just tap into the wallets that are already dominating. → Copy the winners: Humans deal on intuition and vibes. Bots play on numbers and network latency. In this game, "intuition" always loses against "code." You have two choices here. You could learn how to code or you could “copy” people who have done it before you

Blaze

66,385 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Claude Code Templates now has a web interface for browsing and contributing templates 🙌 What it does: Install templates for different languages/frameworks to get started with Claude Code faster. How to use: - Go to - Run: npm install -g claude-code-templates - Pick a template from the site - Copy and run the template command - Start coding with Claude Code The whole thing runs on GitHub - no fancy backend, no hidden stuff. Everything you're installing is right there in the repo for you to inspect. Contributing: Want to add your own template? Just follow the contribution guide and send a PR. Once merged, it automatically shows up on the site. That's it... nothing fancy, just something to save a few minutes when starting new projects with Claude Code Repo:
2:15

Claude Code Templates now has a web interface for browsing and contributing templates 🙌 What it does: Install templates for different languages/frameworks to get started with Claude Code faster. How to use: - Go to - Run: npm install -g claude-code-templates - Pick a template from the site - Copy and run the template command - Start coding with Claude Code The whole thing runs on GitHub - no fancy backend, no hidden stuff. Everything you're installing is right there in the repo for you to inspect. Contributing: Want to add your own template? Just follow the contribution guide and send a PR. Once merged, it automatically shows up on the site. That's it... nothing fancy, just something to save a few minutes when starting new projects with Claude Code Repo:

Daniel San

60,766 просмотров • 1 год назад

I gave Claude Fable 5 just $100 to test the simplest arbitrage. Left my laptop opened for 24 hours. Session PnL: clean $1,571.66 On Polymarket, YES + NO Aren't there thousands of arbitrage bots already? Absolutely. You're not competing against people. You're competing against infrastructure. The biggest improvement wasn't a new strategy. It was rebuilding the entire execution pipeline. The bot runs on a VPS close to the APIs it talks to instead of my local machine. It keeps persistent connections open instead of reconnecting every request. Market metadata is cached in memory so it only refreshes live prices. Orders are prepared before the opportunity exists. When YES + NO finally drops below $1, there's almost nothing left to calculate. It checks liquidity, order book and submits both legs immediately. Will that beat firms spending millions on low-latency infrastructure? Probably not. It doesn't have to. There are hundreds of active prediction markets, constant volatility and plenty of opportunities that last long enough for a well-engineered bot to compete. That's probably the biggest thing Claude Fable 5 changed for me. I stopped asking it to build me a trading bot and started asking where am I wasting milliseconds. That single shift made the bot noticeably more competitive than any new trading strategy I could have invented. Arbitrage is the king. Irt lives everywhere. The only question is are you ready to study it. Leaving a full build + latency tips guide below this post.
0:46

I gave Claude Fable 5 just $100 to test the simplest arbitrage. Left my laptop opened for 24 hours. Session PnL: clean $1,571.66 On Polymarket, YES + NO Aren't there thousands of arbitrage bots already? Absolutely. You're not competing against people. You're competing against infrastructure. The biggest improvement wasn't a new strategy. It was rebuilding the entire execution pipeline. The bot runs on a VPS close to the APIs it talks to instead of my local machine. It keeps persistent connections open instead of reconnecting every request. Market metadata is cached in memory so it only refreshes live prices. Orders are prepared before the opportunity exists. When YES + NO finally drops below $1, there's almost nothing left to calculate. It checks liquidity, order book and submits both legs immediately. Will that beat firms spending millions on low-latency infrastructure? Probably not. It doesn't have to. There are hundreds of active prediction markets, constant volatility and plenty of opportunities that last long enough for a well-engineered bot to compete. That's probably the biggest thing Claude Fable 5 changed for me. I stopped asking it to build me a trading bot and started asking where am I wasting milliseconds. That single shift made the bot noticeably more competitive than any new trading strategy I could have invented. Arbitrage is the king. Irt lives everywhere. The only question is are you ready to study it. Leaving a full build + latency tips guide below this post.

Oracle Boar

18,091 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

how to build the fastest Polymarket latency bot +$100k/month PnL if you hit 1,000+ trades/day cleanly 0x8dxd is just a latency bot that farms the 200–500ms gap between Binance moving and Polymarket waking up. the part that matters isn't some alpha model, it's reading spot first and hitting the book before odds adjust.​ where the $100k+/month comes from it's not one massive bet. it's clipping tiny edges thousands of times. 0x8dxd started with $313 and ended month one around $438k, now sits north of $550k all‑time PnL with ~5.6k–7k trades at 96–98% win rate on BTC/ETH/SOL 15‑minute windows.​ if you're consistently pulling 1–2% per cycle over 1,000+ trades/month with real size, six figures is just arithmetic.​ first, the edge: spot (Binance/Coinbase) moves first, Polymarket's 15‑minute up/down windows lag by 200–500ms before odds fully reprice. latency bots live in that window: spot already moved, book still thinks it's 50/50, bot fixes the misprice and takes the edge.​ what you actually need: - Python + official py‑clob‑client to prove the idea, Rust CLOB client if you want to compete with 0x8dxd‑level bots.​ - WebSocket feeds for BTC/ETH/SOL from Binance/Coinbase (REST polling is too slow).​ Dedicated Polygon RPC node so your orders don't die in public rate limits.​ - VPS physically close to Polymarket's infra (ping is literally part of your edge).​ where people mess up: they try "HFT" from a laptop with Python + public RPC and wonder why their 300ms reaction gets farmed by a 30ms Rust engine.​ the bot loop (in plain English) pull real‑time spot for BTC/ETH/SOL via WebSocket, track short‑term % moves over a few seconds.​ for each 15‑minute crypto market on Polymarket: check if spot moved beyond your threshold (e.g. ±2%) while Polymarket odds barely changed.​ if BTC rips and the "down" contract is still priced like a coinflip, load NO at stale odds. if BTC nukes and "up" is still fat, fade that with NO or take YES on "down" depending on the market structure.​ log market, entry odds, exit odds, realized edge. that's it. no AI, no news scraping, just enforcing what spot already told you.​ where to get real references: Finbold/MEXC breakdowns: exactly how a bot took $313 to $438k on Polymarket using BTC 15‑minute windows and latency between spot and odds.​ BlakeNastri's X thread: dug through 0x8dxd's stats, ~5.6k trades and ~96%+ win rate, called it latency arbitrage not insider magic.​ two real‑world gotchas (that decide profit vs loss) edge decay: as more bots pile in, the 200–500ms lag shrinks and your edge turns into noise. research on Polymarket shows arbitrage bots already extracted tens of millions.​ self‑slippage: once you scale to real size, you start moving the book yourself - without proper sizing and staggering, you donate your edge back to the market.​ how to make it feel "pro" fast run only on high‑volume crypto windows: (BTC/ETH/SOL 15‑minute) where size actually fills and you can hit 1,000+ trades/month without breaking the market.​ start with tiny tickets ($20–50 per trade), prove the edge over thousands of logs with fees and slippage included, only then scale size not risk per trade.​ use official libs and known clients as your backbone, treat random "Polymarket bot" repos as hostile until you audit them - there are already GitHub bots caught stealing keys
0:21

how to build the fastest Polymarket latency bot +$100k/month PnL if you hit 1,000+ trades/day cleanly 0x8dxd is just a latency bot that farms the 200–500ms gap between Binance moving and Polymarket waking up. the part that matters isn't some alpha model, it's reading spot first and hitting the book before odds adjust.​ where the $100k+/month comes from it's not one massive bet. it's clipping tiny edges thousands of times. 0x8dxd started with $313 and ended month one around $438k, now sits north of $550k all‑time PnL with ~5.6k–7k trades at 96–98% win rate on BTC/ETH/SOL 15‑minute windows.​ if you're consistently pulling 1–2% per cycle over 1,000+ trades/month with real size, six figures is just arithmetic.​ first, the edge: spot (Binance/Coinbase) moves first, Polymarket's 15‑minute up/down windows lag by 200–500ms before odds fully reprice. latency bots live in that window: spot already moved, book still thinks it's 50/50, bot fixes the misprice and takes the edge.​ what you actually need: - Python + official py‑clob‑client to prove the idea, Rust CLOB client if you want to compete with 0x8dxd‑level bots.​ - WebSocket feeds for BTC/ETH/SOL from Binance/Coinbase (REST polling is too slow).​ Dedicated Polygon RPC node so your orders don't die in public rate limits.​ - VPS physically close to Polymarket's infra (ping is literally part of your edge).​ where people mess up: they try "HFT" from a laptop with Python + public RPC and wonder why their 300ms reaction gets farmed by a 30ms Rust engine.​ the bot loop (in plain English) pull real‑time spot for BTC/ETH/SOL via WebSocket, track short‑term % moves over a few seconds.​ for each 15‑minute crypto market on Polymarket: check if spot moved beyond your threshold (e.g. ±2%) while Polymarket odds barely changed.​ if BTC rips and the "down" contract is still priced like a coinflip, load NO at stale odds. if BTC nukes and "up" is still fat, fade that with NO or take YES on "down" depending on the market structure.​ log market, entry odds, exit odds, realized edge. that's it. no AI, no news scraping, just enforcing what spot already told you.​ where to get real references: Finbold/MEXC breakdowns: exactly how a bot took $313 to $438k on Polymarket using BTC 15‑minute windows and latency between spot and odds.​ BlakeNastri's X thread: dug through 0x8dxd's stats, ~5.6k trades and ~96%+ win rate, called it latency arbitrage not insider magic.​ two real‑world gotchas (that decide profit vs loss) edge decay: as more bots pile in, the 200–500ms lag shrinks and your edge turns into noise. research on Polymarket shows arbitrage bots already extracted tens of millions.​ self‑slippage: once you scale to real size, you start moving the book yourself - without proper sizing and staggering, you donate your edge back to the market.​ how to make it feel "pro" fast run only on high‑volume crypto windows: (BTC/ETH/SOL 15‑minute) where size actually fills and you can hit 1,000+ trades/month without breaking the market.​ start with tiny tickets ($20–50 per trade), prove the edge over thousands of logs with fees and slippage included, only then scale size not risk per trade.​ use official libs and known clients as your backbone, treat random "Polymarket bot" repos as hostile until you audit them - there are already GitHub bots caught stealing keys

0xCryptoGirl

25,454 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

David Goggins says most people get lost in life because they fail to master the mental game: "Nothing in the world can do it like pushing yourself to the absolute limit. This is going beyond your talent. When there's no more talent. What happens to you? Most people quit. People only go to their talent level. And once their talent is gone, it becomes a mental game." "Most people can only perform to their talent level. And they ask themselves 'Man, why am I messing up right here?', 'Why is this, like, my big hurdle?'... It's because you're performing to your talent. And after that your mind has nothing for you." "I see fighters, I see runners, I see people who are great. But they get to the edge of their talent, and they're like, what's up? Because you're at the point now, where your talent can't help you. And now it's the mental game." "That's where people get lost in life. Lost in that next level. It's a talent problem." "And that is exactly what goes on in the human mind when you have a talent problem. So how are you going to defeat that bro? You're sitting there getting beat down by a guy. Just on you. Throwing you down. Take down. Take down. Hit in the face. And all that's going through you mind is there's no positivity in that." "But when you train the mind the way I train mine. You're ready man. You're ready." "First of all I didn't have much talent. So I had to train one thing. You better train your mind. Because my talent is going to run out way early." "When stuff got hard for me back in the day bro, I'm done, I'm out, See Ya! OK. I've got to invent an alter ego that can. So I invented 'Goggins'." "I invented someone who realized we're not good enough, but 'Goggins' realized we're mentally strong, and we're going to out strength the competition in the mind."
5:24

David Goggins says most people get lost in life because they fail to master the mental game: "Nothing in the world can do it like pushing yourself to the absolute limit. This is going beyond your talent. When there's no more talent. What happens to you? Most people quit. People only go to their talent level. And once their talent is gone, it becomes a mental game." "Most people can only perform to their talent level. And they ask themselves 'Man, why am I messing up right here?', 'Why is this, like, my big hurdle?'... It's because you're performing to your talent. And after that your mind has nothing for you." "I see fighters, I see runners, I see people who are great. But they get to the edge of their talent, and they're like, what's up? Because you're at the point now, where your talent can't help you. And now it's the mental game." "That's where people get lost in life. Lost in that next level. It's a talent problem." "And that is exactly what goes on in the human mind when you have a talent problem. So how are you going to defeat that bro? You're sitting there getting beat down by a guy. Just on you. Throwing you down. Take down. Take down. Hit in the face. And all that's going through you mind is there's no positivity in that." "But when you train the mind the way I train mine. You're ready man. You're ready." "First of all I didn't have much talent. So I had to train one thing. You better train your mind. Because my talent is going to run out way early." "When stuff got hard for me back in the day bro, I'm done, I'm out, See Ya! OK. I've got to invent an alter ego that can. So I invented 'Goggins'." "I invented someone who realized we're not good enough, but 'Goggins' realized we're mentally strong, and we're going to out strength the competition in the mind."

Josh Chambers

14,766 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Boris Cherny (Creator of Claude Code): "The one technical book I would recommend to everyone that has had the greatest impact on me as an engineer is functional programming in Scala. You're probably never going to use Scala day today, but the way it teaches you to think about coding problems is just such a change from the way that most people were in coding, either practically or in school. It's just. It's incredible. It's going to completely change the way that you code now. I think in types, when I code, the thing that matters in your code the most is the type signatures. This is more important than the code itself." Boris Cherny
0:26

Boris Cherny (Creator of Claude Code): "The one technical book I would recommend to everyone that has had the greatest impact on me as an engineer is functional programming in Scala. You're probably never going to use Scala day today, but the way it teaches you to think about coding problems is just such a change from the way that most people were in coding, either practically or in school. It's just. It's incredible. It's going to completely change the way that you code now. I think in types, when I code, the thing that matters in your code the most is the type signatures. This is more important than the code itself." Boris Cherny

Ryan Peterman

365,032 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Fogo Thesis -> Zero Compromise Latency became accepted Fairness became negotiable wtf happened? Crypto is supposed to fix finance. If you’re a trader, 400ms isn't fast enough. 100ms isn't even fast enough. Once you pull back a couple layers it's wild what's going on🤯 You’re fighting for PnL against bots and arbitrageurs. The only thing that matters. Latency, Latency, Latency Fogo is a high-performance L1 purpose-built for trading, but engineered for any project that demands performance. Speed: 40ms block times. Faster than a blink. seriously so fast. Frictionless: Fogo Sessions. No more signing every transaction. No more gas fees for users. Smooth af. Location: Localized consensus. Fogo took the "hardware game" seriously and put the validators where the liquidity lives. Done with the trade-offs Done with the "jack of all trades, master of none" L1s Done with toxic flow No latency. No friction. No BS. TLDW: jump to the timestamp you want. 0:00 - What's broken? reat onchain trading experience 0:33 - The Problem: Why 400ms isn't Fast Enough 1:18 - The Two Bad Options: CEX vs. DEX 2:22 - Latency is the Only Thing That Matters 3:25 - Fogo Sessions: Making a DEX feel like a CEX 4:59 - The Team: Why Experience Matters 6:38 - The Arsenal: Why You Need the Right Tools 8:00 - Obsessed with Latency: Localized Consensus \ 9:27 - Why 40ms Block Times 10:34 - The Holy Grail: Optimized UX & Deep Liquidity 11:24 - Dual Flow Batch Auctions (Stopping MEV) 12:34 - The Threat: "Corpo Chains" are Coming 13:52 - Community & Being Nimble 15:35 - Why We Don't Need "L1 Wars" 16:10 - Conclusion: Building for the Next Decade
17:19

The Fogo Thesis -> Zero Compromise Latency became accepted Fairness became negotiable wtf happened? Crypto is supposed to fix finance. If you’re a trader, 400ms isn't fast enough. 100ms isn't even fast enough. Once you pull back a couple layers it's wild what's going on🤯 You’re fighting for PnL against bots and arbitrageurs. The only thing that matters. Latency, Latency, Latency Fogo is a high-performance L1 purpose-built for trading, but engineered for any project that demands performance. Speed: 40ms block times. Faster than a blink. seriously so fast. Frictionless: Fogo Sessions. No more signing every transaction. No more gas fees for users. Smooth af. Location: Localized consensus. Fogo took the "hardware game" seriously and put the validators where the liquidity lives. Done with the trade-offs Done with the "jack of all trades, master of none" L1s Done with toxic flow No latency. No friction. No BS. TLDW: jump to the timestamp you want. 0:00 - What's broken? reat onchain trading experience 0:33 - The Problem: Why 400ms isn't Fast Enough 1:18 - The Two Bad Options: CEX vs. DEX 2:22 - Latency is the Only Thing That Matters 3:25 - Fogo Sessions: Making a DEX feel like a CEX 4:59 - The Team: Why Experience Matters 6:38 - The Arsenal: Why You Need the Right Tools 8:00 - Obsessed with Latency: Localized Consensus \ 9:27 - Why 40ms Block Times 10:34 - The Holy Grail: Optimized UX & Deep Liquidity 11:24 - Dual Flow Batch Auctions (Stopping MEV) 12:34 - The Threat: "Corpo Chains" are Coming 13:52 - Community & Being Nimble 15:35 - Why We Don't Need "L1 Wars" 16:10 - Conclusion: Building for the Next Decade

Jared

73,534 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.travis kalanick on finding your business soulmate: "I like to say you go out on a date with an idea. Was it a good date? Did it go well? How did you and the idea get along? Who you are is going to be a big part of which idea works for you. [I call this] finding your sport or your business soulmate. If you're in touch with who you are then when the right idea comes your way you just know."
0:42

.travis kalanick on finding your business soulmate: "I like to say you go out on a date with an idea. Was it a good date? Did it go well? How did you and the idea get along? Who you are is going to be a big part of which idea works for you. [I call this] finding your sport or your business soulmate. If you're in touch with who you are then when the right idea comes your way you just know."

David Senra

18,236 просмотров • 12 дней назад

Togi says your window of opportunity is a pinhole by the time you're 30 and it's impossible to argue with "The real risk in this life is not taking the quote unquote risk right because your window of opportunity is closing. And when you're on your deathbed you're not going to be thinking oh thank goodness that no one ever saw me fail. You're going to be thinking holy sh*t, I never got to see myself shine..." "Because then the bills pile up and you're more and more every month locked into this job because the system it hardens. The pressure once you're in the job, you get a slight bonus at the end of the year and now rent is going up and you now have whatever" "You turn 25, you got to pay for your own health insurance. It hardens, hardens, hardens and now you have a kid, at 30 years old you're locked in"
1:29

Togi says your window of opportunity is a pinhole by the time you're 30 and it's impossible to argue with "The real risk in this life is not taking the quote unquote risk right because your window of opportunity is closing. And when you're on your deathbed you're not going to be thinking oh thank goodness that no one ever saw me fail. You're going to be thinking holy sh*t, I never got to see myself shine..." "Because then the bills pile up and you're more and more every month locked into this job because the system it hardens. The pressure once you're in the job, you get a slight bonus at the end of the year and now rent is going up and you now have whatever" "You turn 25, you got to pay for your own health insurance. It hardens, hardens, hardens and now you have a kid, at 30 years old you're locked in"

katsu

107,342 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Rich Roll on why waiting to "feel like it" is a trap: "You can't think your way into the mood that you seek or the state of mind that you aspire to inhabit. Action is the only thing that can trigger that change." Rich uses running as the perfect illustration of this principle. Imagine you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to do a run because you're training for a race. You don't feel like it. So what do most of us do? "We all resort to that state where we think, 'Well, I don't want to do it right now. I'll just wait until I feel like doing it and then I'll do it then.'" But here's the problem with that logic: "If you're waiting until you feel like doing something, chances are you're probably never going to get to it." The mood you're hoping will arrive on its own? It's not coming. Not without action first. "To take the action despite how you feel about it is the thing that catalyzes the state change." You don't run because you feel motivated. You feel motivated because you ran. He points to what every runner knows from experience: "When they finish the run, they're always glad that they did it. They don't generally regret it. And then they feel better." Notice the sequence. The good feeling comes after the action, not before it. The state change is the reward for showing up, not the prerequisite. And this isn't just about running. As Rich puts it: "That example is applicable to all areas of life." The workout you're avoiding. The conversation you're delaying. The project you're putting off until you're "in the right headspace." You're waiting for a feeling that only exists on the other side of doing the thing.
0:59

Rich Roll on why waiting to "feel like it" is a trap: "You can't think your way into the mood that you seek or the state of mind that you aspire to inhabit. Action is the only thing that can trigger that change." Rich uses running as the perfect illustration of this principle. Imagine you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to do a run because you're training for a race. You don't feel like it. So what do most of us do? "We all resort to that state where we think, 'Well, I don't want to do it right now. I'll just wait until I feel like doing it and then I'll do it then.'" But here's the problem with that logic: "If you're waiting until you feel like doing something, chances are you're probably never going to get to it." The mood you're hoping will arrive on its own? It's not coming. Not without action first. "To take the action despite how you feel about it is the thing that catalyzes the state change." You don't run because you feel motivated. You feel motivated because you ran. He points to what every runner knows from experience: "When they finish the run, they're always glad that they did it. They don't generally regret it. And then they feel better." Notice the sequence. The good feeling comes after the action, not before it. The state change is the reward for showing up, not the prerequisite. And this isn't just about running. As Rich puts it: "That example is applicable to all areas of life." The workout you're avoiding. The conversation you're delaying. The project you're putting off until you're "in the right headspace." You're waiting for a feeling that only exists on the other side of doing the thing.

Kevin Tanaka

10,256 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Kevin Garnett says today’s NBA is more of a ‘event’ than a ‘sport’ “I say this with respect cause today’s game is a lot more faster, more technical, they exhaust dribble little to much. You can get right to it if you want. It’s a bit of an event. It’s not a sport. Sports were on the ground. I’m seeing how they presented it from what it used to be to what it is now…. You got to play with an edge. You got to be in the gym. If your celebrity is in front of your work, then that’s a problem… I don’t know if our players are working at steam engine or peak level. I watch workouts. I hate the walk back to grab It then go. I hate that sh*t. That’s not game speed” (Via
1:47

Kevin Garnett says today’s NBA is more of a ‘event’ than a ‘sport’ “I say this with respect cause today’s game is a lot more faster, more technical, they exhaust dribble little to much. You can get right to it if you want. It’s a bit of an event. It’s not a sport. Sports were on the ground. I’m seeing how they presented it from what it used to be to what it is now…. You got to play with an edge. You got to be in the gym. If your celebrity is in front of your work, then that’s a problem… I don’t know if our players are working at steam engine or peak level. I watch workouts. I hate the walk back to grab It then go. I hate that sh*t. That’s not game speed” (Via

NBA Courtside

125,044 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Something I am curious about and I wanted to see if the community is feeling the same way that I am. Does it feel like your ammo does nothing towards chest shots? Since there is no wipes on Escape From Tarkov anymore it feels like Ammo has become not as good and Its because everyone is running T5 and T6 plates I guess? Its not impossible to get high tier ammo but its not easy either. It feels like shooting someone in the chest just doesn't matter anymore with the ammo that you can get from traders and from crafting. So you need to headshot people instead of shooting for chest because chest shots unless you have the best ammo just isn't worth it because people take no damage from certain shots because of how the armor is done right now. I don't really know how to fix it this unless they went back to the old armor system? It just feels like things are weird right now and I wanted to make a post and see how everyone else in the community thought about it. Here is a video of me getting shot by the BTR and my armor tanked the entire round and did 0 damage to my chest.
0:30

Something I am curious about and I wanted to see if the community is feeling the same way that I am. Does it feel like your ammo does nothing towards chest shots? Since there is no wipes on Escape From Tarkov anymore it feels like Ammo has become not as good and Its because everyone is running T5 and T6 plates I guess? Its not impossible to get high tier ammo but its not easy either. It feels like shooting someone in the chest just doesn't matter anymore with the ammo that you can get from traders and from crafting. So you need to headshot people instead of shooting for chest because chest shots unless you have the best ammo just isn't worth it because people take no damage from certain shots because of how the armor is done right now. I don't really know how to fix it this unless they went back to the old armor system? It just feels like things are weird right now and I wanted to make a post and see how everyone else in the community thought about it. Here is a video of me getting shot by the BTR and my armor tanked the entire round and did 0 damage to my chest.

Velion

18,283 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Your government is not there to make you healthy. You are. Stop waiting for someone to save you. Stop outsourcing the most important thing you will ever be responsible for to an industry that profits from your illness. I've had surgery. I'm grateful it exists. But if you are sitting there right now taking drugs just to stay alive, ask yourself why no one is helping you get off of them. All I have ever asked for is choice. The right to be informed. The right to decide what goes into my body and my children's bodies. That's it. That's the whole fight. And if your doctor cannot look you in the eye and have that conversation honestly... you are in the wrong place. Your health belongs to you. It always has.
0:45

Your government is not there to make you healthy. You are. Stop waiting for someone to save you. Stop outsourcing the most important thing you will ever be responsible for to an industry that profits from your illness. I've had surgery. I'm grateful it exists. But if you are sitting there right now taking drugs just to stay alive, ask yourself why no one is helping you get off of them. All I have ever asked for is choice. The right to be informed. The right to decide what goes into my body and my children's bodies. That's it. That's the whole fight. And if your doctor cannot look you in the eye and have that conversation honestly... you are in the wrong place. Your health belongs to you. It always has.

Del Bigtree

16,868 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 NOW: President Trump just said America is about to surge the Golden Age as soon as the Iran war ends "As soon as this war is over, which will not be long, you're going to see oil prices dropped, and you're going to see a stock market, which is already at the highest points in history, go through the roof, you're going to see the Golden Age of America, frankly, and you're seeing it now." "Don't forget, you have hundreds of ships that are loaded up with oils that want to come out." "You're going to have inflation that goes way down." "Now with all of this, inflation is much lower than it was under Biden. Biden had the highest inflation in the history of our country. Inflation is nothing but comparison, but our inflation is just your term." "If you go from before, just before the war, we were for the last three months, 1.7 percent."
1:19

🚨 NOW: President Trump just said America is about to surge the Golden Age as soon as the Iran war ends "As soon as this war is over, which will not be long, you're going to see oil prices dropped, and you're going to see a stock market, which is already at the highest points in history, go through the roof, you're going to see the Golden Age of America, frankly, and you're seeing it now." "Don't forget, you have hundreds of ships that are loaded up with oils that want to come out." "You're going to have inflation that goes way down." "Now with all of this, inflation is much lower than it was under Biden. Biden had the highest inflation in the history of our country. Inflation is nothing but comparison, but our inflation is just your term." "If you go from before, just before the war, we were for the last three months, 1.7 percent."

Eric Daugherty

119,778 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад