Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard “Actively Working to Declassify” Directed Energy Weapon and COVID-19 Information Before June 30 Departure As Watchdog Group Sues Multiple Government Agencies Over Alleged Cover-Up This week on Straight to the Point, I sat down with Chris Farrell, Director of Investigations and Research at Judicial Watch...

C__Herridge's profile picture

Catherine Herridge

1,043,349 subscribers

1,439,754 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

EXCLUSIVE: DNI Gabbard’s investigative team assessed that the Biden-era Intelligence Assessment about Directed Energy Attacks contained “serious and significant errors in judgment” that were inconsistent with the expected professional standards for CIA analysis An ODNI Spokesperson said “As DNI Gabbard told Chairman Crawford during the Annual Threat Assessment hearing in March, she believes the Biden-era ICA[Intelligent Community Assessment] on AHIs should be retracted.” A CIA official said the CIA Director “...has been clear, including in sworn testimony before Congress, that CIA defers to ODNI leading an interagency analytic review of AHIs.” LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios
1:05

EXCLUSIVE: DNI Gabbard’s investigative team assessed that the Biden-era Intelligence Assessment about Directed Energy Attacks contained “serious and significant errors in judgment” that were inconsistent with the expected professional standards for CIA analysis An ODNI Spokesperson said “As DNI Gabbard told Chairman Crawford during the Annual Threat Assessment hearing in March, she believes the Biden-era ICA[Intelligent Community Assessment] on AHIs should be retracted.” A CIA official said the CIA Director “...has been clear, including in sworn testimony before Congress, that CIA defers to ODNI leading an interagency analytic review of AHIs.” LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios

Catherine Herridge

122,164 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

EXCLUSIVE: Strong indicators CIA Was Tracking DNI Tulsi Gabbard Investigative Team Emerged Months Ago An ODNI official said, “We have confirmed that the Intelligence Community Inspector General is aware of the allegations and is working, alongside ODNI and interagency partners, to uncover the truth about any potential wrongdoing.” A CIA official said the agency “has been and will continue to be supportive of any IG investigation into past conduct by CIA on this issue.” LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios
1:31

EXCLUSIVE: Strong indicators CIA Was Tracking DNI Tulsi Gabbard Investigative Team Emerged Months Ago An ODNI official said, “We have confirmed that the Intelligence Community Inspector General is aware of the allegations and is working, alongside ODNI and interagency partners, to uncover the truth about any potential wrongdoing.” A CIA official said the agency “has been and will continue to be supportive of any IG investigation into past conduct by CIA on this issue.” LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios

Catherine Herridge

289,182 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

EXCLUSIVE: Former Senior CIA Operations Officer James Erdman III Blows The Whistle on “Shadow Government,” Urges Senators To Focus On Fauci and The Money Trail, Alleges CIA Effort to Block His COVID-19 Senate Testimony, Destruction Directed Energy Attack Records And Spying on Former DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s Investigators On the Eve of Dr. Fauci’s Scheduled Testimony Wednesday Senator Rand Paul Erdman details “bureaucratic guerrilla warfare” to hide the facts, what he calls the “Globalist” mentality inside the intelligence community, push back against Donald J. Trump’s agenda, reveals potential financial conflicts of interest surrounding Dr. Anthony Fauci and gain-of-function research and why he believes the Havana Syndrome cover-up was bigger than COVID. CIA Director of Public Affairs Liz Lyons provided this statement: “There is no disputing CIA’s record of successfully executing on President Trump’s transparency initiatives. Any insinuation that CIA was an obstacle and not a facilitator is wrong—the DIG was temporary and disbanded at the direction of the DNI herself after less than a year.” Former DNI Gabbard did not immediately respond, nor did the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Dr. Anthony Fauci and Peter Daszak did not return emails seeking comment. 01:51 Erdman “The CIA that I joined is not the CIA that we have today” 02:44 Alleges CIA Effort To Block His Whistleblower COVID-19 Origins Testimony 05:07 Senate Democrats “No Show” 05:46 Fauci, Health Officials: Credible Allegations Financial Conflicts of Interest 08:30 Senator Rand Paul Records: FBI Blocks CBP Access COVID Scientist 09:19 Intel Community More Involved in High Risk “Gain of Function Research" Than Publicly Acknowledged 11:08 Is There A Scenario Where Dr. Fauci, His Associates Go To Jail? 12:20 Opposition to President Trump’s Election Integrity Investigations 13:20 “Massaging” Trump’s Daily Brief/China 14:18 Shadow Government — “We’ve Got Globalists Working Inside The Intelligence Community” 17:20 MK Ultra + JFK Assassination Files 18:47 CIA/ODNI “Bureaucratic Guerilla Warfare,” Alleges Spying on Gabbard team 20:20 Former CIA Director Brennan Loyalists Still Inside HQ 23:03 Erdman: Havana Syndrome Cover Up Worse Than COVID-19, Claims CIA Records Destroyed 27:34 Records About Suspected Directed Energy Weapon Should Be Declassified 28:28 Took ‘Everything Gabbard Had’ To Retract Defective Biden-Era Reports 29:26 Directed Energy Weapons: Real People Have Been Harmed 29:50 Insider Threats 30:12 UAP Reports Can Be Released 33:41 Lawsuit Over CIA Officers Who Were “Non-Complaint” With Vaccine Mandates 36:22 Tulsi Gabbard: “I think she's the only one who actually conducted IC reform and did exactly what President Trump was asking her to do…” 37:40 Completed Reports Can Be Released: UAP, COVID-19 and Directed Energy Attacks
39:41

EXCLUSIVE: Former Senior CIA Operations Officer James Erdman III Blows The Whistle on “Shadow Government,” Urges Senators To Focus On Fauci and The Money Trail, Alleges CIA Effort to Block His COVID-19 Senate Testimony, Destruction Directed Energy Attack Records And Spying on Former DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s Investigators On the Eve of Dr. Fauci’s Scheduled Testimony Wednesday Senator Rand Paul Erdman details “bureaucratic guerrilla warfare” to hide the facts, what he calls the “Globalist” mentality inside the intelligence community, push back against Donald J. Trump’s agenda, reveals potential financial conflicts of interest surrounding Dr. Anthony Fauci and gain-of-function research and why he believes the Havana Syndrome cover-up was bigger than COVID. CIA Director of Public Affairs Liz Lyons provided this statement: “There is no disputing CIA’s record of successfully executing on President Trump’s transparency initiatives. Any insinuation that CIA was an obstacle and not a facilitator is wrong—the DIG was temporary and disbanded at the direction of the DNI herself after less than a year.” Former DNI Gabbard did not immediately respond, nor did the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Dr. Anthony Fauci and Peter Daszak did not return emails seeking comment. 01:51 Erdman “The CIA that I joined is not the CIA that we have today” 02:44 Alleges CIA Effort To Block His Whistleblower COVID-19 Origins Testimony 05:07 Senate Democrats “No Show” 05:46 Fauci, Health Officials: Credible Allegations Financial Conflicts of Interest 08:30 Senator Rand Paul Records: FBI Blocks CBP Access COVID Scientist 09:19 Intel Community More Involved in High Risk “Gain of Function Research" Than Publicly Acknowledged 11:08 Is There A Scenario Where Dr. Fauci, His Associates Go To Jail? 12:20 Opposition to President Trump’s Election Integrity Investigations 13:20 “Massaging” Trump’s Daily Brief/China 14:18 Shadow Government — “We’ve Got Globalists Working Inside The Intelligence Community” 17:20 MK Ultra + JFK Assassination Files 18:47 CIA/ODNI “Bureaucratic Guerilla Warfare,” Alleges Spying on Gabbard team 20:20 Former CIA Director Brennan Loyalists Still Inside HQ 23:03 Erdman: Havana Syndrome Cover Up Worse Than COVID-19, Claims CIA Records Destroyed 27:34 Records About Suspected Directed Energy Weapon Should Be Declassified 28:28 Took ‘Everything Gabbard Had’ To Retract Defective Biden-Era Reports 29:26 Directed Energy Weapons: Real People Have Been Harmed 29:50 Insider Threats 30:12 UAP Reports Can Be Released 33:41 Lawsuit Over CIA Officers Who Were “Non-Complaint” With Vaccine Mandates 36:22 Tulsi Gabbard: “I think she's the only one who actually conducted IC reform and did exactly what President Trump was asking her to do…” 37:40 Completed Reports Can Be Released: UAP, COVID-19 and Directed Energy Attacks

Catherine Herridge

2,574,029 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

United States government officials have for decades reassured the public that they are releasing all they have, save for the most sensitive information, on the origin of Covid, the CIA mind control program known as MKUltra, the JFK assassination, and the Church Committee investigation into the intelligence community (IC) abuses in 1975. In 2023, then-Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Avril Haines delivered a five-page summary of Covid origins in response to a unanimously passed law requiring the declassification of files. MKUltra involved drugging individuals without their knowledge in an effort to control their thoughts and behaviors. The CIA stated in 2022 that it had released 95% of its JFK collection, and the Trump administration released roughly 80,000 pages of JFK records on March 18, 2025. But an active-duty CIA official testified to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee today that the CIA and the Intelligence Community (IC) are still hiding information. James Erdman III, a senior CIA operations officer who led the Director’s Initiatives Group investigation into Covid origins under DNI Tulsi Gabbard, appeared under subpoena from committee Chairman Rand Paul. Erdman told senators that the CIA “did not comply with lawful oversight” during his investigation, and said, “CIA managers retaliated against [analysts] for their refusal to agree with management’s middle-of-the-night anonymous review.” Erdman testifie,d “The CIA illegally monitored the computer and phone usage of DIG [Director’s Initiative Group] personnel, their investigations, and contact with whistleblowers…One CIA contractor assisting with the DIG’s investigation into the events that transpired between 2022 and 2023 was fired by the CIA one day after meeting with the DIG.” Erdman said the CIA had not cleared his testimony or written statement before the hearing. The CIA denounced the hearing as “dishonest political theater,” and not a single Democratic Senator showed up for it. A CIA spokesperson, Liz Lyons, said in a statement that “the Committee acted in bad faith by subpoenaing an Agency officer for testimony today without notifying CIA.” She added that “the witness testifying today is not appearing as a whistleblower in pursuit of the truth, but instead in response to the subpoena issued by Chairman Paul.” And she implied the hearing was not needed since “the CIA has already assessed Covid-19 most likely originated from a lab leak, and efforts to undermine that conclusion are disingenuous.” But the public CIA statement quoted at the hearing did not address Erdman’s specific claims about DIG monitoring, the contractor firing, or the 40 boxes of JFK and MKUltra files. Sen. Paul, who noted that “closed-door testimony doesn’t provide oversight” and “public testimony provides oversight.” The CIA made public in January 2025 a low-confidence assessment that COVID-19 likely had a research-related origin, while saying both lab and natural-origin scenarios remained plausible, which Paul called “a cleanup operation.” Nor did she address Erdman’s claim that, “When the DIG ceased operations, the CIA also took back 40 boxes of JFK files and MKUltra files being processed for declassification by DNI.” Public reached out to the CIA for comment on Erdman’s specific allegations and will update this article if it replies. Support for Erdman’s claims came from former CBS News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge. “As early as February,” she wrote on X, “I began receiving credible reporting that DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s investigative team was being tracked and communications collected because their work was revealing ‘uncomfortable facts.’” Paul opened the hearing by describing the Biological Sciences Experts Group (BESG), an ODNI advisory body that he said included Dr. Ralph Baric and Dr. Peter Daszak, both of whom collaborated with Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers on coronavirus gain-of-function studies. Daszak, Paul noted, received “hundreds of millions of dollars from the US government and worked with Dr. Zhengli Shi in Wuhan to create gain-of-function coronaviruses,” and that Baric “was also part of BSEG and an active consultant to intelligence agencies on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Paul noted that “Dozens of times, [former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci] referred to the idea that the pandemic originating in the lab was a conspiracy theory.” Erdman said that as of August 12, 2021, the CIA was considering calling Covid a lab leak, but that the conclusion “changed on August 17th of 2021.” Erdman told the panel that “the CIA would not provide us documentation that we asked for” and “we have no idea why that changed.” Erdman also testified that “Director Gabbard is working through, I believe, 2,000 pages” of Covid origins records the CIA had been resisting releasing. That figure contrasts with the five-page summary the ODNI delivered to Congress in 2023. Senator Josh Hawley asked Erdman whether the five-page report was “all the information the United States government had,” and Erdman replied, “that is not all the information.” Erdman described a 2022 CIA “re-look” in which eight of 10 analysts and six of seven technical experts leaned toward a lab leak. He said management overruled the team and changed the analytic line to read that “we may never precisely know the origin of SARS-CoV-2.” Paul noted that there have been over 1,500 major lab leaks. Sen. Paul revealed that the CIA is still denying him information that Senators are entitled to see under the Constitution, which requires Congressional oversight of the executive branch. Paul said the CIA had resisted releasing to him the underlying Covid origins analyses by its own scientists, even in classified form. Paul also said, “I’ve been trying to get the classified version of the [1975] Church Committee [files] for over two years,” he said, “but I’m being blocked by the [Intelligence] Committee, including someone from our own party who is blocking me. They’ve shown me a room with 400 boxes. I can go look in all the boxes to see if I can find it. My staff’s not allowed to go in the room.” The CIA told Senate investigators in 1977 that, after the Church inquiry, it had discovered seven additional boxes of MKUltra files in its retired records center that prior searches had missed. The 1977 hearing identified 149 MKUltra subprojects involving human testing and 33 additional subprojects whose subject matter remained undisclosed. Reuters reported that in early April 2025, an ODNI team led by Defense Intelligence Agency official Paul Allen McDonald II arrived unannounced at a CIA archival facility in the Washington area to seize Kennedy assassination files. The team included Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, a former CIA officer and daughter-in-law of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The standoff stretched into the early morning hours and ended only after the CIA agreed to transfer a “massive trove” of documents to the National Archives for digitization. Why did these cover-ups occur and why are some of them still ongoing? And why didn’t any Democratic senators participate in the hearing?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!
7:15

United States government officials have for decades reassured the public that they are releasing all they have, save for the most sensitive information, on the origin of Covid, the CIA mind control program known as MKUltra, the JFK assassination, and the Church Committee investigation into the intelligence community (IC) abuses in 1975. In 2023, then-Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Avril Haines delivered a five-page summary of Covid origins in response to a unanimously passed law requiring the declassification of files. MKUltra involved drugging individuals without their knowledge in an effort to control their thoughts and behaviors. The CIA stated in 2022 that it had released 95% of its JFK collection, and the Trump administration released roughly 80,000 pages of JFK records on March 18, 2025. But an active-duty CIA official testified to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee today that the CIA and the Intelligence Community (IC) are still hiding information. James Erdman III, a senior CIA operations officer who led the Director’s Initiatives Group investigation into Covid origins under DNI Tulsi Gabbard, appeared under subpoena from committee Chairman Rand Paul. Erdman told senators that the CIA “did not comply with lawful oversight” during his investigation, and said, “CIA managers retaliated against [analysts] for their refusal to agree with management’s middle-of-the-night anonymous review.” Erdman testifie,d “The CIA illegally monitored the computer and phone usage of DIG [Director’s Initiative Group] personnel, their investigations, and contact with whistleblowers…One CIA contractor assisting with the DIG’s investigation into the events that transpired between 2022 and 2023 was fired by the CIA one day after meeting with the DIG.” Erdman said the CIA had not cleared his testimony or written statement before the hearing. The CIA denounced the hearing as “dishonest political theater,” and not a single Democratic Senator showed up for it. A CIA spokesperson, Liz Lyons, said in a statement that “the Committee acted in bad faith by subpoenaing an Agency officer for testimony today without notifying CIA.” She added that “the witness testifying today is not appearing as a whistleblower in pursuit of the truth, but instead in response to the subpoena issued by Chairman Paul.” And she implied the hearing was not needed since “the CIA has already assessed Covid-19 most likely originated from a lab leak, and efforts to undermine that conclusion are disingenuous.” But the public CIA statement quoted at the hearing did not address Erdman’s specific claims about DIG monitoring, the contractor firing, or the 40 boxes of JFK and MKUltra files. Sen. Paul, who noted that “closed-door testimony doesn’t provide oversight” and “public testimony provides oversight.” The CIA made public in January 2025 a low-confidence assessment that COVID-19 likely had a research-related origin, while saying both lab and natural-origin scenarios remained plausible, which Paul called “a cleanup operation.” Nor did she address Erdman’s claim that, “When the DIG ceased operations, the CIA also took back 40 boxes of JFK files and MKUltra files being processed for declassification by DNI.” Public reached out to the CIA for comment on Erdman’s specific allegations and will update this article if it replies. Support for Erdman’s claims came from former CBS News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge. “As early as February,” she wrote on X, “I began receiving credible reporting that DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s investigative team was being tracked and communications collected because their work was revealing ‘uncomfortable facts.’” Paul opened the hearing by describing the Biological Sciences Experts Group (BESG), an ODNI advisory body that he said included Dr. Ralph Baric and Dr. Peter Daszak, both of whom collaborated with Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers on coronavirus gain-of-function studies. Daszak, Paul noted, received “hundreds of millions of dollars from the US government and worked with Dr. Zhengli Shi in Wuhan to create gain-of-function coronaviruses,” and that Baric “was also part of BSEG and an active consultant to intelligence agencies on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Paul noted that “Dozens of times, [former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci] referred to the idea that the pandemic originating in the lab was a conspiracy theory.” Erdman said that as of August 12, 2021, the CIA was considering calling Covid a lab leak, but that the conclusion “changed on August 17th of 2021.” Erdman told the panel that “the CIA would not provide us documentation that we asked for” and “we have no idea why that changed.” Erdman also testified that “Director Gabbard is working through, I believe, 2,000 pages” of Covid origins records the CIA had been resisting releasing. That figure contrasts with the five-page summary the ODNI delivered to Congress in 2023. Senator Josh Hawley asked Erdman whether the five-page report was “all the information the United States government had,” and Erdman replied, “that is not all the information.” Erdman described a 2022 CIA “re-look” in which eight of 10 analysts and six of seven technical experts leaned toward a lab leak. He said management overruled the team and changed the analytic line to read that “we may never precisely know the origin of SARS-CoV-2.” Paul noted that there have been over 1,500 major lab leaks. Sen. Paul revealed that the CIA is still denying him information that Senators are entitled to see under the Constitution, which requires Congressional oversight of the executive branch. Paul said the CIA had resisted releasing to him the underlying Covid origins analyses by its own scientists, even in classified form. Paul also said, “I’ve been trying to get the classified version of the [1975] Church Committee [files] for over two years,” he said, “but I’m being blocked by the [Intelligence] Committee, including someone from our own party who is blocking me. They’ve shown me a room with 400 boxes. I can go look in all the boxes to see if I can find it. My staff’s not allowed to go in the room.” The CIA told Senate investigators in 1977 that, after the Church inquiry, it had discovered seven additional boxes of MKUltra files in its retired records center that prior searches had missed. The 1977 hearing identified 149 MKUltra subprojects involving human testing and 33 additional subprojects whose subject matter remained undisclosed. Reuters reported that in early April 2025, an ODNI team led by Defense Intelligence Agency official Paul Allen McDonald II arrived unannounced at a CIA archival facility in the Washington area to seize Kennedy assassination files. The team included Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, a former CIA officer and daughter-in-law of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The standoff stretched into the early morning hours and ended only after the CIA agreed to transfer a “massive trove” of documents to the National Archives for digitization. Why did these cover-ups occur and why are some of them still ongoing? And why didn’t any Democratic senators participate in the hearing?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

31,434 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Here it is: Documents obtained by investigative journalist John Solomon through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). CONFIRMS King Solomon. In a stunning exchange, CIA Director Mike Morell turns to fellow Director John Brennan and asks if he would join in toppling the United States government during the November 3, 2020, election. Brennan not only agrees—but also expresses his gratitude. CIA Director Mike Morell: “Can I add your name to this list? Will be adding Leon Panetta, Sue Gordon, Jeh Johnson, George, Lisa Monaco, and Mike Rogers. And working on adding Dan Coats, Mike Rogers (HPSCI), and Tom Bossert. And lots of other IC career folk. “Trying to give the incapacitated vegetable, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue.” CIA Director John Brennan: “Ok, Michael, add my name to the list. Good initiative. Thanks for asking me to sign on.” ——- It wasn’t just 51 former intelligence officials who were involved. The Central Intelligence Agency itself was actively involved as well, and its director, Gina Haspel, approved it. •David S. Cariens was informed about the Hunter Biden “intel” statement by a CIA employee. •David Cariens was read the text from the statement by a CIA employee. •David Cariens was asked to sign the statement by a CIA employee. Janice Cariens is retired CIA (1995), and she was also asked to sign the letter. In fact, Mike Morrel was a CIA contractor, and Christopher Wray had been sitting on the laptop since December 2019. CIA contractor—Mike Morell testified that such action by a CIA employees would be unethical and inappropriate. In other words: 2020 was a coordinated conspiracy involving the Obama-Biden campaign, the intelligence community—including the CIA and the FBI—to topple the U.S. government.
0:19

Here it is: Documents obtained by investigative journalist John Solomon through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). CONFIRMS King Solomon. In a stunning exchange, CIA Director Mike Morell turns to fellow Director John Brennan and asks if he would join in toppling the United States government during the November 3, 2020, election. Brennan not only agrees—but also expresses his gratitude. CIA Director Mike Morell: “Can I add your name to this list? Will be adding Leon Panetta, Sue Gordon, Jeh Johnson, George, Lisa Monaco, and Mike Rogers. And working on adding Dan Coats, Mike Rogers (HPSCI), and Tom Bossert. And lots of other IC career folk. “Trying to give the incapacitated vegetable, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue.” CIA Director John Brennan: “Ok, Michael, add my name to the list. Good initiative. Thanks for asking me to sign on.” ——- It wasn’t just 51 former intelligence officials who were involved. The Central Intelligence Agency itself was actively involved as well, and its director, Gina Haspel, approved it. •David S. Cariens was informed about the Hunter Biden “intel” statement by a CIA employee. •David Cariens was read the text from the statement by a CIA employee. •David Cariens was asked to sign the statement by a CIA employee. Janice Cariens is retired CIA (1995), and she was also asked to sign the letter. In fact, Mike Morrel was a CIA contractor, and Christopher Wray had been sitting on the laptop since December 2019. CIA contractor—Mike Morell testified that such action by a CIA employees would be unethical and inappropriate. In other words: 2020 was a coordinated conspiracy involving the Obama-Biden campaign, the intelligence community—including the CIA and the FBI—to topple the U.S. government.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

36,569 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Today Confirmed The CIA Illegally Spied On Donald Trump When Running Against Barack Obama, Now’s The Perfect Time To Reshare This: Mainstream Reporting Barack Obama Spied on Congress, Reporters, Donald Trump, Millions of Americans, etc “Tonight, at least one US senator is calling for the CIA director to resign after the agency admitted today to spying, not on a foreign government, but on our own congress, improperly finding their way into US senate computers during an investigation into the CIA's interrogation techniques after 911. We get details tonight from NBC's Andrea Mitchell. For months, the CIA has denied spying on the senate, Hacking into computers, spying on senate investigators looking into alleged CIA torture of prisoners after 911. The CIA director was emphatic in March. The CIA went into their computers and took documents out and were attempting to block their own investigation. The facts will come out, but let me assure you that CIA in no way was spying on the SSCI or the senate. Had issue a suspected CIA cover up of waterboarding and harsh interrogation techniques during the Bush years. The senate intelligence chair demanded answers. I have grave concerns That the CIA search may well have violated the separation of powers principles embodied in the United States Constitution. Today, the CIA's own watchdog, the inspector general, said Brennan was wrong. 5 agency employees, including 2 attorneys, improperly accessed the computers, launching a keyword search of all and a review of some of the emails of Democratic staff members. Who authorized the search? We need to know why they thought it was legal, and we know need to know how that person is gonna be held accountable. Other senators are demanding that CIA director, John Brennan, one of the president's closest advisers, be fired. This is that 5 year long torture investigation is about to be released any day now, Brian? Andrea Mitchell in our DC newsroom tonight. Andrea, thanks. It's not about justice. It's not about agenda. It's not about mobilizing people. It's about Dialing for corporate dollars. These two parties have sold the US government and the American people to the highest spinners.”
2:05

Today Confirmed The CIA Illegally Spied On Donald Trump When Running Against Barack Obama, Now’s The Perfect Time To Reshare This: Mainstream Reporting Barack Obama Spied on Congress, Reporters, Donald Trump, Millions of Americans, etc “Tonight, at least one US senator is calling for the CIA director to resign after the agency admitted today to spying, not on a foreign government, but on our own congress, improperly finding their way into US senate computers during an investigation into the CIA's interrogation techniques after 911. We get details tonight from NBC's Andrea Mitchell. For months, the CIA has denied spying on the senate, Hacking into computers, spying on senate investigators looking into alleged CIA torture of prisoners after 911. The CIA director was emphatic in March. The CIA went into their computers and took documents out and were attempting to block their own investigation. The facts will come out, but let me assure you that CIA in no way was spying on the SSCI or the senate. Had issue a suspected CIA cover up of waterboarding and harsh interrogation techniques during the Bush years. The senate intelligence chair demanded answers. I have grave concerns That the CIA search may well have violated the separation of powers principles embodied in the United States Constitution. Today, the CIA's own watchdog, the inspector general, said Brennan was wrong. 5 agency employees, including 2 attorneys, improperly accessed the computers, launching a keyword search of all and a review of some of the emails of Democratic staff members. Who authorized the search? We need to know why they thought it was legal, and we know need to know how that person is gonna be held accountable. Other senators are demanding that CIA director, John Brennan, one of the president's closest advisers, be fired. This is that 5 year long torture investigation is about to be released any day now, Brian? Andrea Mitchell in our DC newsroom tonight. Andrea, thanks. It's not about justice. It's not about agenda. It's not about mobilizing people. It's about Dialing for corporate dollars. These two parties have sold the US government and the American people to the highest spinners.”

Wall Street Apes

625,308 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

NEW: 🚨 Civil War within the Intelligence Community 🚨 Trump hating Senator Rand Paul Rand Paul subpoenaed a CIA official yesterday to testify about the origins of COVID-19. But, this wasn’t just any CIA officer. James Erdman James Erdman was in the Director’s Initiatives Group, Tulsi Gabbard’s Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 handpicked hatchet men responsible for running politically motivated investigations that advance her personal agenda. The group has since been shut down. During the hearing, Erdman was flanked by Carolyn Rocco Krow1218 (another Gabbard political operator whom I’ve previously reported on: and Ivan Raiklin (who continues to promote the debunked theory that a CIA Police Officer was responsible for the January 6th pipe bombs). Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 clearly tried to undermine President Trump’s negotiating position with China on the first day of his historic China Summit. Rand Paul and his father Ron Paul have consistently criticized President Trump’s foreign policy, and now they are attempting to sour the relationship with China even further while we’re on the precipice of a deal. Tulsi maintains an incredibly positive relationship with the Paul family, which makes sense given their hate for Trump and their deeply anti-Semitic views: Watch the clip below where Senator Johnson Ron Johnson attempts to smear CIA Director Ratcliffe CIA Director John Ratcliffe, the President’s most trusted intelligence advisor. Tulsi’s allies are now openly attacking Ratcliffe CIA Director John Ratcliffe, likely because he is far more competent than the bumbling Jew haters and chronic leakers over at ODNI Office of the DNI. This hearing was also amplified by Trump hating traitor and Tulsi Gabbard’s close friend Joe Kent Joe Kent, who is currently under FBI investigation for allegedly leaking classified information. The CIA was absolutely right to call this an act of political theater: If Erdman’s closed testimony was truly so insightful, Tulsi could have simply declassified it like she just did for the HPSCI hearings by former Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson. During the hearing, Erdman and Senator Paul seemed to have a VERY friendly and familiar relationship. I’d like to know how much they communicate? The hearing seemed 100% staged. It probably was, knowing what we know about Tulsi and the fact that it was scheduled for Day 1 of President Trump’s China Summit.
0:32

NEW: 🚨 Civil War within the Intelligence Community 🚨 Trump hating Senator Rand Paul Rand Paul subpoenaed a CIA official yesterday to testify about the origins of COVID-19. But, this wasn’t just any CIA officer. James Erdman James Erdman was in the Director’s Initiatives Group, Tulsi Gabbard’s Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 handpicked hatchet men responsible for running politically motivated investigations that advance her personal agenda. The group has since been shut down. During the hearing, Erdman was flanked by Carolyn Rocco Krow1218 (another Gabbard political operator whom I’ve previously reported on: and Ivan Raiklin (who continues to promote the debunked theory that a CIA Police Officer was responsible for the January 6th pipe bombs). Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 clearly tried to undermine President Trump’s negotiating position with China on the first day of his historic China Summit. Rand Paul and his father Ron Paul have consistently criticized President Trump’s foreign policy, and now they are attempting to sour the relationship with China even further while we’re on the precipice of a deal. Tulsi maintains an incredibly positive relationship with the Paul family, which makes sense given their hate for Trump and their deeply anti-Semitic views: Watch the clip below where Senator Johnson Ron Johnson attempts to smear CIA Director Ratcliffe CIA Director John Ratcliffe, the President’s most trusted intelligence advisor. Tulsi’s allies are now openly attacking Ratcliffe CIA Director John Ratcliffe, likely because he is far more competent than the bumbling Jew haters and chronic leakers over at ODNI Office of the DNI. This hearing was also amplified by Trump hating traitor and Tulsi Gabbard’s close friend Joe Kent Joe Kent, who is currently under FBI investigation for allegedly leaking classified information. The CIA was absolutely right to call this an act of political theater: If Erdman’s closed testimony was truly so insightful, Tulsi could have simply declassified it like she just did for the HPSCI hearings by former Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson. During the hearing, Erdman and Senator Paul seemed to have a VERY friendly and familiar relationship. I’d like to know how much they communicate? The hearing seemed 100% staged. It probably was, knowing what we know about Tulsi and the fact that it was scheduled for Day 1 of President Trump’s China Summit.

Laura Loomer

98,855 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Straight to the Point: Directed Energy Weapons Exposing the Biden-Era Havana Syndrome Cover-Up Over the last year, whistleblowers from the CIA, State Department and Defense experts came forward to our team to dismantle the false narrative that these attacks began in 2016 with a cluster of cases in Cuba. The debilitating cognitive and neurological conditions are commonly known as Havana Syndrome. Havana Syndrome survivors allege a government cover up to minimize the severity of their brain injuries and the cause of the attacks. In a new exclusive interview, a former defense department staffer says she was hit with a directed energy weapon in 2015. LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios 00:40 'Kristi' : Every Year More of My Brain is Gone 01:01 Directed Energy Attack in 2015 Unfolded Like A Spy Novel 02:00 Blue Screen of Death 03:20 Directed Energy Attacks: Disrupt brain networks, can cause progressive damage and brain cell death 05:10 Kristi’s Brain Scans: MRI shows holes in brain not typically seen in adults 06:05 Some Walter Reed Military Hospital Staff allegedly pressured not to document the severity of their injuries, including traumatic brain injuries. 07:29 CIA Whistleblower ‘Alice”: I was hit by a directed energy attack in Africa 08:20 Government Gaslighting 09:18 Once trusted with nation’s secrets, ‘Alice’ relies on a service dog to manage day to day life 09:57 Alice: “I’ve already started having to go to funerals” for other Havana Syndrome victims 10:40 State Department Whistleblower says he was retaliated against under the Biden administration and the retaliation has continued under the new administration 11:40 Retired Counterintelligence officer Mike Beck was diagnosed with early onset Parkinson’s Disease. Beck Can No Longer Live At Home. He Recently Moved Into Full Time Assisted Living. 13:01 Beck: “Agencies involved did everything they could to not approve my application (for workers' compensation.)” 14:49 In response to our reporting, Beck’s compensation claim was paid in full. The Director of National Intelligence “committed to initiating" a new investigation into Havana Syndrome incidents. 15:56 Even with a new administration, Havana Syndrome survivors say they are still waiting for recognition of their injuries and the cause of the attacks. "...just because the heads of the agencies have changed or departments have changed doesn't mean that the actors deeper within the bureaucracy have changed and that some house cleaning needs to take place.."
17:09

Straight to the Point: Directed Energy Weapons Exposing the Biden-Era Havana Syndrome Cover-Up Over the last year, whistleblowers from the CIA, State Department and Defense experts came forward to our team to dismantle the false narrative that these attacks began in 2016 with a cluster of cases in Cuba. The debilitating cognitive and neurological conditions are commonly known as Havana Syndrome. Havana Syndrome survivors allege a government cover up to minimize the severity of their brain injuries and the cause of the attacks. In a new exclusive interview, a former defense department staffer says she was hit with a directed energy weapon in 2015. LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios 00:40 'Kristi' : Every Year More of My Brain is Gone 01:01 Directed Energy Attack in 2015 Unfolded Like A Spy Novel 02:00 Blue Screen of Death 03:20 Directed Energy Attacks: Disrupt brain networks, can cause progressive damage and brain cell death 05:10 Kristi’s Brain Scans: MRI shows holes in brain not typically seen in adults 06:05 Some Walter Reed Military Hospital Staff allegedly pressured not to document the severity of their injuries, including traumatic brain injuries. 07:29 CIA Whistleblower ‘Alice”: I was hit by a directed energy attack in Africa 08:20 Government Gaslighting 09:18 Once trusted with nation’s secrets, ‘Alice’ relies on a service dog to manage day to day life 09:57 Alice: “I’ve already started having to go to funerals” for other Havana Syndrome victims 10:40 State Department Whistleblower says he was retaliated against under the Biden administration and the retaliation has continued under the new administration 11:40 Retired Counterintelligence officer Mike Beck was diagnosed with early onset Parkinson’s Disease. Beck Can No Longer Live At Home. He Recently Moved Into Full Time Assisted Living. 13:01 Beck: “Agencies involved did everything they could to not approve my application (for workers' compensation.)” 14:49 In response to our reporting, Beck’s compensation claim was paid in full. The Director of National Intelligence “committed to initiating" a new investigation into Havana Syndrome incidents. 15:56 Even with a new administration, Havana Syndrome survivors say they are still waiting for recognition of their injuries and the cause of the attacks. "...just because the heads of the agencies have changed or departments have changed doesn't mean that the actors deeper within the bureaucracy have changed and that some house cleaning needs to take place.."

Catherine Herridge

2,301,953 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

“Totalitarian” Powers, Fear, And Psychopathy Behind CIA’s Secret Rule Over U.S. The agency remains out of control, beyond the law, and a direct threat to democracy and freedom, including in the U.S. by Michael Shellenberger Last week, we published two stories about a senior CIA whistleblower who was one of four CIA analysts who helped write a January 2017 “Intelligence Community Assessment” (ICA) that falsely claimed, with high confidence, that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to help elect President Donald Trump in 2016. The person said that the CIA Director under Obama, John Brennan, had a “pathological need for control” and put the writers of the ICA “under duress” to include a mention of a fraudulent dossier, commissioned by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. The CIA also included in the classified version of the ICA an annex consisting of the dossier written by a former British spy, which went to roughly 200 people in Washington, some of whom leaked related information to journalists. Unfortunately, the CIA employee said, his employer remains corrupted by “systemic rot” and that crucial steps “have not been put in place" to prevent a Russiagate-like abuse of power from happening again, since the arrival of its new director, John Ratcliffe, in January of this year. “Two critical steps that have not been put in place are,” said the senior analyst turned whistleblower, “to first, formalize expectations about the delivery timeline for sensitive intelligence analyses, and second, to remove the CIA Director from the review process of intelligence reporting or finished analysis.” In response to questions from Public, the CIA said it was taking necessary reforms. “Director Ratcliffe has overhauled the Agency senior ranks and revoked clearances from bad actors and even created a mission center to better execute on Presidential priorities like the Southern Border. The notion that he’s not making significant reforms or holding people and the Agency accountable is not just ridiculously false but beyond absurd.” But the CIA’s revoking security clearances and creating a mission center do not address either of the whistleblower’s recommendations, much less the “systemic rot” within the CIA. The whistleblower called for the removal of the Director of the CIA from review and writing of intelligence analysis, and taking a step to avoid rush jobs, like the kind Brennan used to create a deliberately misleading ICA in January 2017. The whistleblower’s credibility is high. They were one of just four CIA analysts chosen to help write a major ICA. That might make them seem biased toward Brennan, but Ratcliffe has retained the person, rather than fired them, which suggests that the Director or the direct reports he trusts view the person as valuable. Our sense was that the person was loyal to the CIA, wants to engage in objective apolitical analyses, and wants to remain at the CIA. Their two modest proposed reforms are consistent with loyalty to the CIA. As such, the person is precisely the kind of professional the CIA, Congress, and the American people should want to have in our institutions. If a legitimate criticism is to be made of the person it would be that they didn’t turn whistleblower earlier, which is the same criticism that could be made against hundreds and perhaps thousands of people involved in the Russiagate hoax. One might hope that it was just a bad day for the PR people at the CIA, and that Ratcliffe will be out with a new statement this week announcing new reforms, but we are not hopeful. The CIA appears to be following its informal motto, “Admit nothing, deny everything, and make counteraccusations.” That was the advice that former CIA Director Porter Goss said he would give to “a graduating class of CIA case officers” in 2006. The Russiagate hoax is hardly an unusual scandal in the history of the CIA. The agency has “long gone beyond the borders of American values,” noted Tim Weiner in his 812-page history, Legacy of Ashes. The CIA has murdered its employees, overthrown democracies, propped up dictatorships, tortured innocent people, trained death squads, induced mental illness in illegal medical experiments, spied illegally on law-abiding Americans, and may have been behind the assassination of an American president. All of these illegal behaviors required cover-ups, many of them elaborate. “Fundamentally, the founding fathers of U.S. intelligence were liars,” said James Angleton, one of the CIA’s founders, and its Director of Counterintelligence for two decades, on his deathbed in 1987. “If you were in a room with them, you were in a room full of people that you had to believe would deservedly end up in hell. I guess I will see them there soon.” The CIA’s record is poor when evaluated on its own terms. “The CIA was established to prevent unanticipated disasters, such as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,” noted John Judis in 2005, “but it has repeatedly failed to warn the White House of looming threats. It missed the North Korean invasion of the South in 1950, and the Chinese entry into the war that fall; Israel, France, and Great Britain's attack on the Suez Canal and Egypt in 1956; the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968; the Shah of Iran's ouster in 1979; the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan that year; the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990; the Indian nuclear tests in 1998 (‘We didn't have a clue,’ CIA director George Tenet remarked afterwards); the attack on the World Trade Center in 1993; the bombing of American military barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1996 and of U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998; the attack on the USS Cole in 2000; and of course the attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon in September 2001.” The truth, admitted a CIA station chief, “was that the agency at the height of its powers had a great reputation and a terrible record.” It never had a single Soviet spy “who had deep insight into the workings of the Kremlin,” and thus didn’t know communism was collapsing. “The one crime of lasting consequence has been the CIA’s inability to carry out its central mission: informing the president of what is happening in the world,” writes Weiner. Its record in the real world is one of “fleeting successes and long-lasting failures.” The politicization and weaponization of the CIA for ideological aims has occurred for decades. The CIA’s charter prevents it from spying on Americans and yet it has done so repeatedly, from opening mail to spying on students. Between 1947 and 1963, the CIA was “a dark and invasive force — at home and abroad — violating citizens’ privacy, kidnapping, torturing, and killing at will,” concluded David Talbot in his 686-page history of the CIA, The Devil’s Chessboard. There were many reforms proposed in the 1970s. In 1975, Congress held hearings, revealing CIA misdeeds around the world, including assassinations using a heart attack gun, and efforts at mind control. Congress then took steps to provide greater oversight of the CIA and more protections for whistleblowers. Calls for reforms began again in the 1990s after a decade of CIA scandals in the 1980s, which included selling weapons to the Iranian government and illegally diverting the money to an equally illegal war in Central America. In 1991 and 1996, the US Senator from New York, Patrick Moynihan, who had been one of America’s most influential public intellectuals for thirty years, proposed abolishing the CIA entirely and reassigning its various functions to the State Department. The proposal never came up for a vote. In 1998, America’s intelligence leaders warned the White House that America would suffer “a catastrophic, systemic failure,” unless the U.S. dramatically changed how it gathered and analyzed intelligence. That didn’t happen. Then, in 2001, the CIA failed to communicate with the FBI and thus played a central role in allowing the 9/11 attacks to happen. In 2002, the CIA manipulated intelligence that led to the catastrophic invasion of Iraq. In response to these failures, Congress in 2004 sought to reform the agency and the broader Intelligence Community. The intent of Congress in passing new legislation was to reduce the power of the CIA, and its Director, and increase the power of a new intelligence coordinator role, which it called the Director of National Intelligence. That didn’t happen. The “CIA is broken,” wrote John Judis one year later. The 2004 reform act didn’t address the “historical problems with the CIA.” “To repair it,” he concluded, “we may need to start from scratch.” That didn’t happen either. In 2016 and 2017, the CIA manipulated intelligence to falsely frame the democratically elected U.S. president as a puppet for a foreign power, and from 2016 to 2020, individuals who worked at the CIA oversaw various efforts to control what people are allowed to say on social media. Neither the Russiagate hoax scandal nor the CIA’s role in creating a Censorship Industrial Complex resulted in reform or even serious calls for it by Congress. Multiple sources tell Public that the CIA remains both the dominant agency of the 18 total in the IC, and the one most resistant to reforms. The Washington Post reported last week that the CIA resisted efforts for greater transparency led by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. And now the CIA has said we should ignore the whistleblowing by one of its most trusted senior analysts, and their demands for reform. None of this is new. In 1947, the year Congress created the CIA, the Secretary of State at the time, Dean Acheson, said he “had the gravest forebodings” about it and “warned the President that neither he” nor anyone else would be able “to control it.” Between 1947 and 2005 there were 14 major studies by various bodies into how to reform the IC. The CIA “has had an almost perfect record of resisting fundamental changes,” noted Weiner in his 2006 book. Meanwhile, Congress has failed its Constitutional duty to provide oversight. “The CIA has tried to assassinate foreign leaders, mined harbors, and most recently, tortured prisoners,” wrote Judis in 2005. “If Congress had openly debated these actions, they would not have been approved.” They didn’t and have never much demanded to be able to. Members of Congress “have been derelict in this work for much of the past three decades,” noted Weiner two years later, “but their conduct since 9/11 has bordered on criminal negligence.” Looking at the full historical record, it is hard not to conclude that the American people only partially govern themselves, that we are burdened with a rogue and violent intelligence agency that continuously interferes not only in foreign elections and governments but also our own, and that many on the Right and the Left who appear to be in a position to change that refuse to do so. Why is that? Why have Congress and the American people failed for 80 years to reform a rogue intelligence agency that is not only ineffective but also destructive to the point of undermining national security? And what, if anything, can be done about it? If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's defense of free speech and democracy, watch the rest of the video, and read the rest of the article!
7:37

“Totalitarian” Powers, Fear, And Psychopathy Behind CIA’s Secret Rule Over U.S. The agency remains out of control, beyond the law, and a direct threat to democracy and freedom, including in the U.S. by Michael Shellenberger Last week, we published two stories about a senior CIA whistleblower who was one of four CIA analysts who helped write a January 2017 “Intelligence Community Assessment” (ICA) that falsely claimed, with high confidence, that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to help elect President Donald Trump in 2016. The person said that the CIA Director under Obama, John Brennan, had a “pathological need for control” and put the writers of the ICA “under duress” to include a mention of a fraudulent dossier, commissioned by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. The CIA also included in the classified version of the ICA an annex consisting of the dossier written by a former British spy, which went to roughly 200 people in Washington, some of whom leaked related information to journalists. Unfortunately, the CIA employee said, his employer remains corrupted by “systemic rot” and that crucial steps “have not been put in place" to prevent a Russiagate-like abuse of power from happening again, since the arrival of its new director, John Ratcliffe, in January of this year. “Two critical steps that have not been put in place are,” said the senior analyst turned whistleblower, “to first, formalize expectations about the delivery timeline for sensitive intelligence analyses, and second, to remove the CIA Director from the review process of intelligence reporting or finished analysis.” In response to questions from Public, the CIA said it was taking necessary reforms. “Director Ratcliffe has overhauled the Agency senior ranks and revoked clearances from bad actors and even created a mission center to better execute on Presidential priorities like the Southern Border. The notion that he’s not making significant reforms or holding people and the Agency accountable is not just ridiculously false but beyond absurd.” But the CIA’s revoking security clearances and creating a mission center do not address either of the whistleblower’s recommendations, much less the “systemic rot” within the CIA. The whistleblower called for the removal of the Director of the CIA from review and writing of intelligence analysis, and taking a step to avoid rush jobs, like the kind Brennan used to create a deliberately misleading ICA in January 2017. The whistleblower’s credibility is high. They were one of just four CIA analysts chosen to help write a major ICA. That might make them seem biased toward Brennan, but Ratcliffe has retained the person, rather than fired them, which suggests that the Director or the direct reports he trusts view the person as valuable. Our sense was that the person was loyal to the CIA, wants to engage in objective apolitical analyses, and wants to remain at the CIA. Their two modest proposed reforms are consistent with loyalty to the CIA. As such, the person is precisely the kind of professional the CIA, Congress, and the American people should want to have in our institutions. If a legitimate criticism is to be made of the person it would be that they didn’t turn whistleblower earlier, which is the same criticism that could be made against hundreds and perhaps thousands of people involved in the Russiagate hoax. One might hope that it was just a bad day for the PR people at the CIA, and that Ratcliffe will be out with a new statement this week announcing new reforms, but we are not hopeful. The CIA appears to be following its informal motto, “Admit nothing, deny everything, and make counteraccusations.” That was the advice that former CIA Director Porter Goss said he would give to “a graduating class of CIA case officers” in 2006. The Russiagate hoax is hardly an unusual scandal in the history of the CIA. The agency has “long gone beyond the borders of American values,” noted Tim Weiner in his 812-page history, Legacy of Ashes. The CIA has murdered its employees, overthrown democracies, propped up dictatorships, tortured innocent people, trained death squads, induced mental illness in illegal medical experiments, spied illegally on law-abiding Americans, and may have been behind the assassination of an American president. All of these illegal behaviors required cover-ups, many of them elaborate. “Fundamentally, the founding fathers of U.S. intelligence were liars,” said James Angleton, one of the CIA’s founders, and its Director of Counterintelligence for two decades, on his deathbed in 1987. “If you were in a room with them, you were in a room full of people that you had to believe would deservedly end up in hell. I guess I will see them there soon.” The CIA’s record is poor when evaluated on its own terms. “The CIA was established to prevent unanticipated disasters, such as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,” noted John Judis in 2005, “but it has repeatedly failed to warn the White House of looming threats. It missed the North Korean invasion of the South in 1950, and the Chinese entry into the war that fall; Israel, France, and Great Britain's attack on the Suez Canal and Egypt in 1956; the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968; the Shah of Iran's ouster in 1979; the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan that year; the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990; the Indian nuclear tests in 1998 (‘We didn't have a clue,’ CIA director George Tenet remarked afterwards); the attack on the World Trade Center in 1993; the bombing of American military barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1996 and of U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998; the attack on the USS Cole in 2000; and of course the attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon in September 2001.” The truth, admitted a CIA station chief, “was that the agency at the height of its powers had a great reputation and a terrible record.” It never had a single Soviet spy “who had deep insight into the workings of the Kremlin,” and thus didn’t know communism was collapsing. “The one crime of lasting consequence has been the CIA’s inability to carry out its central mission: informing the president of what is happening in the world,” writes Weiner. Its record in the real world is one of “fleeting successes and long-lasting failures.” The politicization and weaponization of the CIA for ideological aims has occurred for decades. The CIA’s charter prevents it from spying on Americans and yet it has done so repeatedly, from opening mail to spying on students. Between 1947 and 1963, the CIA was “a dark and invasive force — at home and abroad — violating citizens’ privacy, kidnapping, torturing, and killing at will,” concluded David Talbot in his 686-page history of the CIA, The Devil’s Chessboard. There were many reforms proposed in the 1970s. In 1975, Congress held hearings, revealing CIA misdeeds around the world, including assassinations using a heart attack gun, and efforts at mind control. Congress then took steps to provide greater oversight of the CIA and more protections for whistleblowers. Calls for reforms began again in the 1990s after a decade of CIA scandals in the 1980s, which included selling weapons to the Iranian government and illegally diverting the money to an equally illegal war in Central America. In 1991 and 1996, the US Senator from New York, Patrick Moynihan, who had been one of America’s most influential public intellectuals for thirty years, proposed abolishing the CIA entirely and reassigning its various functions to the State Department. The proposal never came up for a vote. In 1998, America’s intelligence leaders warned the White House that America would suffer “a catastrophic, systemic failure,” unless the U.S. dramatically changed how it gathered and analyzed intelligence. That didn’t happen. Then, in 2001, the CIA failed to communicate with the FBI and thus played a central role in allowing the 9/11 attacks to happen. In 2002, the CIA manipulated intelligence that led to the catastrophic invasion of Iraq. In response to these failures, Congress in 2004 sought to reform the agency and the broader Intelligence Community. The intent of Congress in passing new legislation was to reduce the power of the CIA, and its Director, and increase the power of a new intelligence coordinator role, which it called the Director of National Intelligence. That didn’t happen. The “CIA is broken,” wrote John Judis one year later. The 2004 reform act didn’t address the “historical problems with the CIA.” “To repair it,” he concluded, “we may need to start from scratch.” That didn’t happen either. In 2016 and 2017, the CIA manipulated intelligence to falsely frame the democratically elected U.S. president as a puppet for a foreign power, and from 2016 to 2020, individuals who worked at the CIA oversaw various efforts to control what people are allowed to say on social media. Neither the Russiagate hoax scandal nor the CIA’s role in creating a Censorship Industrial Complex resulted in reform or even serious calls for it by Congress. Multiple sources tell Public that the CIA remains both the dominant agency of the 18 total in the IC, and the one most resistant to reforms. The Washington Post reported last week that the CIA resisted efforts for greater transparency led by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. And now the CIA has said we should ignore the whistleblowing by one of its most trusted senior analysts, and their demands for reform. None of this is new. In 1947, the year Congress created the CIA, the Secretary of State at the time, Dean Acheson, said he “had the gravest forebodings” about it and “warned the President that neither he” nor anyone else would be able “to control it.” Between 1947 and 2005 there were 14 major studies by various bodies into how to reform the IC. The CIA “has had an almost perfect record of resisting fundamental changes,” noted Weiner in his 2006 book. Meanwhile, Congress has failed its Constitutional duty to provide oversight. “The CIA has tried to assassinate foreign leaders, mined harbors, and most recently, tortured prisoners,” wrote Judis in 2005. “If Congress had openly debated these actions, they would not have been approved.” They didn’t and have never much demanded to be able to. Members of Congress “have been derelict in this work for much of the past three decades,” noted Weiner two years later, “but their conduct since 9/11 has bordered on criminal negligence.” Looking at the full historical record, it is hard not to conclude that the American people only partially govern themselves, that we are burdened with a rogue and violent intelligence agency that continuously interferes not only in foreign elections and governments but also our own, and that many on the Right and the Left who appear to be in a position to change that refuse to do so. Why is that? Why have Congress and the American people failed for 80 years to reform a rogue intelligence agency that is not only ineffective but also destructive to the point of undermining national security? And what, if anything, can be done about it? If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's defense of free speech and democracy, watch the rest of the video, and read the rest of the article!

Michael Shellenberger

48,655 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ALERT: Former CIA officer accused of stealing $40 million in gold bars after FBI found them in his house during a raid. David Rush worked as a high-ranking official in the CIA on a career based entirely on brazen lies. An investigation by the FBI found that Rush had used false information about his education and military experience to gain higher positions in the military and government. Rush applied three times to the CIA, falsely stating that he had degrees from Clemson University and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, as well as an evaluation certification from the US Naval Test Pilot School. None of these claims was true, and neither was the master’s degree in computing technology from the Naval Postgraduate School that Rush claimed to have as well. Investigators noted that employees get higher pay based on education and that his fake master's, “would generally be expected to receive a higher pay scale.” The Federal Aviation Administration says they have no record of Rush, even though he claimed to have graduated from the Air Force Test Pilot School on an application to the CIA’s Senior Executive Service level rank. Rush convinced the CIA to give him the gold bars for “work-related expenses.” During the raid on Rush’s home, investigators found 300 1-kilogram gold bars, $2 million cash, and 35 luxury watches. A spokesperson for the CIA said, “The FBI is working closely with our partners at the CIA and the Department of Justice as we continue to investigate this matter fully. We are committed to following the facts, ensuring accountability, and pursuing justice in accordance with the law.”
1:45

ALERT: Former CIA officer accused of stealing $40 million in gold bars after FBI found them in his house during a raid. David Rush worked as a high-ranking official in the CIA on a career based entirely on brazen lies. An investigation by the FBI found that Rush had used false information about his education and military experience to gain higher positions in the military and government. Rush applied three times to the CIA, falsely stating that he had degrees from Clemson University and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, as well as an evaluation certification from the US Naval Test Pilot School. None of these claims was true, and neither was the master’s degree in computing technology from the Naval Postgraduate School that Rush claimed to have as well. Investigators noted that employees get higher pay based on education and that his fake master's, “would generally be expected to receive a higher pay scale.” The Federal Aviation Administration says they have no record of Rush, even though he claimed to have graduated from the Air Force Test Pilot School on an application to the CIA’s Senior Executive Service level rank. Rush convinced the CIA to give him the gold bars for “work-related expenses.” During the raid on Rush’s home, investigators found 300 1-kilogram gold bars, $2 million cash, and 35 luxury watches. A spokesperson for the CIA said, “The FBI is working closely with our partners at the CIA and the Department of Justice as we continue to investigate this matter fully. We are committed to following the facts, ensuring accountability, and pursuing justice in accordance with the law.”

E X X ➠A L E R T S

55,663 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

EXCLUSIVE: Retired Lieutenant Colonel In US Space Force Breaks His Silence And Accuses Russia of Directed Energy “Terrorism” on American Soil Advocates For Injured DoW Personnel, Should Receive Purple Heart for Debilitating Neurological Conditions. At Least One Purple Heart Has Been Denied. Under the Biden Administration, Defense Health Agency Policy Suppressed Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnoses for Havana Syndrome or Anomalous Health Incidents. In his first on-camera interview, the retired military officer, we agreed to call “Chris,” details five separate Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) attacks at his Northern Virginia home throughout 2020. His wife Heidi is collateral damage in the attack. Chris says the Directed Energy Exposure caused over 40 injuries, including TBI and PTSD, which have been validated as “service connected” by VA records. He attributes the attacks to Russia targeting his classified intel work and links to prior surveillance. Chris is urging full U.S. Government acknowledgment to counter this evolving threat. Straight to the Point: Directed Energy Weapon “Terrorism” On American Soil 00:35 Retired Military Officer: Attacked Five Times on US Soil 01:20 Accuses Russia of Directed Energy “Terrorism” 02:30 Military Medical Records Reinforce Connection to Directed Energy Exposure 03:30 Wife “Collateral Damage” 04:07 Defense Health Agency Email: New Policy Prohibited Doctors From Diagnosing Traumatic Brain Injuries In Directed Energy Cases 05:10 Chris: Every Day Is A Struggle Because of Brain Injury 05:50 Five Directed Energy Attacks At His Home: Each Attack Different 08:10 Final Attacks: Most Severe, Full Body Convulsion 11:00 Russia Had “Keen Interest” in Chris’ Work 11:30 Purple Heart Advocacy for DoW Personnel Injured by Directed Energy 12:40 Purple Heart Denied In At Least One AHI Case 13:00 What Trump Administration Can Do For Families Affected by Directed Energy Attacks 14:57 DoW Response LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios
16:29

EXCLUSIVE: Retired Lieutenant Colonel In US Space Force Breaks His Silence And Accuses Russia of Directed Energy “Terrorism” on American Soil Advocates For Injured DoW Personnel, Should Receive Purple Heart for Debilitating Neurological Conditions. At Least One Purple Heart Has Been Denied. Under the Biden Administration, Defense Health Agency Policy Suppressed Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnoses for Havana Syndrome or Anomalous Health Incidents. In his first on-camera interview, the retired military officer, we agreed to call “Chris,” details five separate Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) attacks at his Northern Virginia home throughout 2020. His wife Heidi is collateral damage in the attack. Chris says the Directed Energy Exposure caused over 40 injuries, including TBI and PTSD, which have been validated as “service connected” by VA records. He attributes the attacks to Russia targeting his classified intel work and links to prior surveillance. Chris is urging full U.S. Government acknowledgment to counter this evolving threat. Straight to the Point: Directed Energy Weapon “Terrorism” On American Soil 00:35 Retired Military Officer: Attacked Five Times on US Soil 01:20 Accuses Russia of Directed Energy “Terrorism” 02:30 Military Medical Records Reinforce Connection to Directed Energy Exposure 03:30 Wife “Collateral Damage” 04:07 Defense Health Agency Email: New Policy Prohibited Doctors From Diagnosing Traumatic Brain Injuries In Directed Energy Cases 05:10 Chris: Every Day Is A Struggle Because of Brain Injury 05:50 Five Directed Energy Attacks At His Home: Each Attack Different 08:10 Final Attacks: Most Severe, Full Body Convulsion 11:00 Russia Had “Keen Interest” in Chris’ Work 11:30 Purple Heart Advocacy for DoW Personnel Injured by Directed Energy 12:40 Purple Heart Denied In At Least One AHI Case 13:00 What Trump Administration Can Do For Families Affected by Directed Energy Attacks 14:57 DoW Response LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios

Catherine Herridge

1,393,636 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Here it is: Director of National Disgrace James Clapper: This, is one project —overthrowing the United States government has to be a team sport. 🔥🔥Bombshell Intelligence Declassified by the Director of National Intelligence, DNI Tulsi Gabbard. This is Admiral Mike Rogers, a four-star admiral in the United States Navy, who served as the second commander of U.S. Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM) and as the 17th Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) under the Kenyan administration. On November 17, 2016, Admiral Mike Rogers traveled to Trump Tower without notifying Barry, Director of National Disgrace James Clapper, and Chief of Sedition CIA Director John Brennan — to warn then–President-elect Donald Trump that he was being overthrown. The following day, Trump’s transition team moved its headquarters to his golf property in Bedminster, New Jersey. Newly declassified emails from James Clapper: “It is essential that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) be on the same page and are all supportive of the report — in the highest tradition of ‘that’s OUR story, and we’re stickin’ to it.’” “We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible as we complete the report, but time is not negotiable.” “We may have to compromise our ‘normal’ modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed timetable.” “This is one project that has to be a team sport. — Jim” Despite concerns, then-NSA Director Mike Rogers stood alone: “I’m concerned that, given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren’t fully comfortable saying they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments.” In other words: how’s that for a $1,776 billion fund—for weaponizing the single most powerful intelligence agencies on the planet to overthrow the United States government in 2016 and a sitting president in 2017.
3:19

Here it is: Director of National Disgrace James Clapper: This, is one project —overthrowing the United States government has to be a team sport. 🔥🔥Bombshell Intelligence Declassified by the Director of National Intelligence, DNI Tulsi Gabbard. This is Admiral Mike Rogers, a four-star admiral in the United States Navy, who served as the second commander of U.S. Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM) and as the 17th Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) under the Kenyan administration. On November 17, 2016, Admiral Mike Rogers traveled to Trump Tower without notifying Barry, Director of National Disgrace James Clapper, and Chief of Sedition CIA Director John Brennan — to warn then–President-elect Donald Trump that he was being overthrown. The following day, Trump’s transition team moved its headquarters to his golf property in Bedminster, New Jersey. Newly declassified emails from James Clapper: “It is essential that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) be on the same page and are all supportive of the report — in the highest tradition of ‘that’s OUR story, and we’re stickin’ to it.’” “We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible as we complete the report, but time is not negotiable.” “We may have to compromise our ‘normal’ modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed timetable.” “This is one project that has to be a team sport. — Jim” Despite concerns, then-NSA Director Mike Rogers stood alone: “I’m concerned that, given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren’t fully comfortable saying they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments.” In other words: how’s that for a $1,776 billion fund—for weaponizing the single most powerful intelligence agencies on the planet to overthrow the United States government in 2016 and a sitting president in 2017.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

105,308 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

WOAH 🚨 Investigative journalist Catherine Herridge says she worked with a special task force created by our Director of National Intelligence and found OUR CIA ‘WAS WORKING WITH GLOBALISTS, TO PRESERVE THE GLOBALIST VIEW’ “In the last week, I've been speaking with a very senior member of Director Gabbard's investigations team, known as the DIG. And what they told me is that they did see a pattern where there was a sense or a feeling in the intelligence community — there was very much a globalist view, and they had to preserve a globalist view” She explains they found evidence that to preserve this globalist view, they had to do things like the Hunter Biden laptop and cover up Chinese threats “So whether it was downplaying or suppressing intelligence about the threat from China, whether it was giving a pass and calling the Hunter Biden laptop Russian disinformation, there was this level of a bureaucracy, a kind of conspiracy that was making decisions about the kind of information that should be reaching policymakers and ultimately the commander-in-chief” She says there is a shadow government that seeks to be running these things “I think the big record that stands out is this instant messaging with a very senior FBI official who does counterintelligence, who describes this shadow government” There is no other way to interpret this than our FBI and CIA were working with globalists for the globalist agenda And the literally know this to be true because remember during Biden’s term they would always fly to the World Economic Forum’s Davos summit to mingle with them This is Treason
4:14

WOAH 🚨 Investigative journalist Catherine Herridge says she worked with a special task force created by our Director of National Intelligence and found OUR CIA ‘WAS WORKING WITH GLOBALISTS, TO PRESERVE THE GLOBALIST VIEW’ “In the last week, I've been speaking with a very senior member of Director Gabbard's investigations team, known as the DIG. And what they told me is that they did see a pattern where there was a sense or a feeling in the intelligence community — there was very much a globalist view, and they had to preserve a globalist view” She explains they found evidence that to preserve this globalist view, they had to do things like the Hunter Biden laptop and cover up Chinese threats “So whether it was downplaying or suppressing intelligence about the threat from China, whether it was giving a pass and calling the Hunter Biden laptop Russian disinformation, there was this level of a bureaucracy, a kind of conspiracy that was making decisions about the kind of information that should be reaching policymakers and ultimately the commander-in-chief” She says there is a shadow government that seeks to be running these things “I think the big record that stands out is this instant messaging with a very senior FBI official who does counterintelligence, who describes this shadow government” There is no other way to interpret this than our FBI and CIA were working with globalists for the globalist agenda And the literally know this to be true because remember during Biden’s term they would always fly to the World Economic Forum’s Davos summit to mingle with them This is Treason

Wall Street Apes

256,806 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

EXCLUSIVE: CIA Whistleblower Claims Employees Who Refused COVID Vaccine Were Accused of Being Spies; Intel Agency Still Will Not Delete Security Related Files of Non-Compliant Officers “…anyone non-compliant with the vaccine mandates, they were investigated by the counter-espionage department.” “Instead of treating it like an employee insubordination issue, they said, yeah, you might be a spy, which is abhorrent. As an intelligence officer, that is absolutely the worst thing you can label somebody.” In response to Erdman’s alleging obstruction of investigations, CIA Director of Public Affairs Liz Lyons provided this statement: “There is no disputing CIA’s record of successfully executing on President Trump’s transparency initiatives. Any insinuation that CIA was an obstacle and not a facilitator is wrong—the DIG was temporary and disbanded at the direction of the DNI herself after less than a year.” You can support my independent work for $7 a month by subscribing Catherine Herridge. Thanks for considering it!
2:19

EXCLUSIVE: CIA Whistleblower Claims Employees Who Refused COVID Vaccine Were Accused of Being Spies; Intel Agency Still Will Not Delete Security Related Files of Non-Compliant Officers “…anyone non-compliant with the vaccine mandates, they were investigated by the counter-espionage department.” “Instead of treating it like an employee insubordination issue, they said, yeah, you might be a spy, which is abhorrent. As an intelligence officer, that is absolutely the worst thing you can label somebody.” In response to Erdman’s alleging obstruction of investigations, CIA Director of Public Affairs Liz Lyons provided this statement: “There is no disputing CIA’s record of successfully executing on President Trump’s transparency initiatives. Any insinuation that CIA was an obstacle and not a facilitator is wrong—the DIG was temporary and disbanded at the direction of the DNI herself after less than a year.” You can support my independent work for $7 a month by subscribing Catherine Herridge. Thanks for considering it!

Catherine Herridge

75,013 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

It sounds like a Hollywood movie. Government intelligence agencies, perhaps CIA and Mossad, use sex with dozens of teenage girls to blackmail some of the world’s most powerful people, including Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, and Bill Clinton. But it’s not a movie. It appears to be what New York investor Jeffrey Epstein did from the 1990s until 2018. One year later, he died in jail, either by suicide or murder. There’s a lot of misinformation out there about this case. The truth is that we don’t have the hard proof that the CIA, FBI, or Mossad were involved in Epstein’s sex trafficking. But we do know that the U.S. Attorney for South Florida at the time, who arranged Epstein’s lenient sentence, said, “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone.” And all of the top journalists who have looked into the Epstein case believe that intelligence agencies, including Mossad and CIA, were involved with Epstein and may have even controlled him. The reason any of this matters is because it’s wrong for the people who are supposed to be protecting us to be involved in sex trafficking. That goes for both minors and adults. Government agencies asking their employees or contractors to be prostitutes is coercive, exploitative, and wrong. How did this happen? Miami Herald reporter Julie Brown gave the answer in her 2021 book: “Epstein got away with his crimes,” she said, “because nearly every element of society allowed him to get away with them.” The includes the FBI, US Department of Justice, Florida State Attorney General, and the media. Vanity Fair and ABC killed stories about Epstein, and the New York Times just last week dismissed new court documents as “fodder for conspiracy theorists.” We don’t really know if Epstein was the mastermind or if he’s working for someone else....
2:35

Sensitive content

It sounds like a Hollywood movie. Government intelligence agencies, perhaps CIA and Mossad, use sex with dozens of teenage girls to blackmail some of the world’s most powerful people, including Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, and Bill Clinton. But it’s not a movie. It appears to be what New York investor Jeffrey Epstein did from the 1990s until 2018. One year later, he died in jail, either by suicide or murder. There’s a lot of misinformation out there about this case. The truth is that we don’t have the hard proof that the CIA, FBI, or Mossad were involved in Epstein’s sex trafficking. But we do know that the U.S. Attorney for South Florida at the time, who arranged Epstein’s lenient sentence, said, “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone.” And all of the top journalists who have looked into the Epstein case believe that intelligence agencies, including Mossad and CIA, were involved with Epstein and may have even controlled him. The reason any of this matters is because it’s wrong for the people who are supposed to be protecting us to be involved in sex trafficking. That goes for both minors and adults. Government agencies asking their employees or contractors to be prostitutes is coercive, exploitative, and wrong. How did this happen? Miami Herald reporter Julie Brown gave the answer in her 2021 book: “Epstein got away with his crimes,” she said, “because nearly every element of society allowed him to get away with them.” The includes the FBI, US Department of Justice, Florida State Attorney General, and the media. Vanity Fair and ABC killed stories about Epstein, and the New York Times just last week dismissed new court documents as “fodder for conspiracy theorists.” We don’t really know if Epstein was the mastermind or if he’s working for someone else....

Michael Shellenberger

1,908,185 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

BREAKING: Top US Neuroscientist & Military Advisor Confirms Reports Are ‘Credible’ That Directed Energy Weapon Attacks Have Happened on US Soil And Targeted US Personnel Abroad; Exclusive New Records Reveal Exposure to “Microwave Weapon” After Intel Officer Discovered Secret Op. “These are weapons of maximum disruption…It allows you to get in fast, hit hard, get out, and only then will the effects begin to be known.” 1:50 Reports of DEW Attacks on US Soil Are Credible 2:50 Different Types of DEWs: Sonic & Scalable, Directable Microwaves 3:30 Retired Counterintelligence Officer Mike Beck Now In Assisted Living Following DEW Attack 4:50 DEW Attack Happened After Beck And His Partner Discovered Operation Targeting USA By Hostile Country 6:40 How DEW Attacks Disrupt & Destroy Brain Networks 7:30 DEW Attack Aftermath: Brain Cell Death & The Domino Effect 8:20 Big Three: USA, Russia & China Have DEW Capability 9:05 Why Beck’s Case Stands Out And The Legacy of Suffering 10:20 CIA Whistleblower ‘Alice’ Targeted by DEW in Africa 11:00 Exclusive New Medical Records Document Beck’s Microwave Weapon Brain Injury 11:55 US Government Denied Beck Workers’ Compensation Multiple Times Before Approving It 12:10 US Government Currently Three Months Behind ($25,000+) On Payments for Beck’s Assisted Living 13:00 Beck: US Government Has Critical Evidence About Attacks & Weapons 14:20 Directed Energy Weapon Attacks Started in 2016: False 14:50 Trump Administration Openly Addresses Havana Syndrome: Secretary Rubio 15:50 Beck’s Request for President Trump
17:30

BREAKING: Top US Neuroscientist & Military Advisor Confirms Reports Are ‘Credible’ That Directed Energy Weapon Attacks Have Happened on US Soil And Targeted US Personnel Abroad; Exclusive New Records Reveal Exposure to “Microwave Weapon” After Intel Officer Discovered Secret Op. “These are weapons of maximum disruption…It allows you to get in fast, hit hard, get out, and only then will the effects begin to be known.” 1:50 Reports of DEW Attacks on US Soil Are Credible 2:50 Different Types of DEWs: Sonic & Scalable, Directable Microwaves 3:30 Retired Counterintelligence Officer Mike Beck Now In Assisted Living Following DEW Attack 4:50 DEW Attack Happened After Beck And His Partner Discovered Operation Targeting USA By Hostile Country 6:40 How DEW Attacks Disrupt & Destroy Brain Networks 7:30 DEW Attack Aftermath: Brain Cell Death & The Domino Effect 8:20 Big Three: USA, Russia & China Have DEW Capability 9:05 Why Beck’s Case Stands Out And The Legacy of Suffering 10:20 CIA Whistleblower ‘Alice’ Targeted by DEW in Africa 11:00 Exclusive New Medical Records Document Beck’s Microwave Weapon Brain Injury 11:55 US Government Denied Beck Workers’ Compensation Multiple Times Before Approving It 12:10 US Government Currently Three Months Behind ($25,000+) On Payments for Beck’s Assisted Living 13:00 Beck: US Government Has Critical Evidence About Attacks & Weapons 14:20 Directed Energy Weapon Attacks Started in 2016: False 14:50 Trump Administration Openly Addresses Havana Syndrome: Secretary Rubio 15:50 Beck’s Request for President Trump

Catherine Herridge

3,049,468 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here it is: Fred Fleitz, then National Security Adviser John Bolton’s chief of staff, CONFIRMS: John Durham; John Bolton; Mike Pompeo; and CIA Director Gina Haspel deliberately withheld and buried evidence, including Barack Obama’s manufactured ICA report—not only in the waning days of the Kenyan administration, but also during his presidency—from the sitting president of the United States. Fred Fleitz: “They rigged and politicized the intelligence, and that was obvious to anyone who read that dynamite report. This included William f**king Barr, Durham, Bolton, Pompeo, Haspel, and other Trump appointees who, instead of exposing the scandal, suppressed it.” Fred Fleitz, who was National Security Adviser John Bolton’s chief of staff, heard that investigators at his former employer, the House Intelligence Committee, were probing the raw intelligence in the ICA supporting the assessment's key judgments. A one-time CIA analyst himself, Fleitz was curious to learn what they had found during the previous year, interviewing CIA analysts and reviewing secret documents at Langley. So, he traveled to the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue and read a draft of the highly classified report in a secure room of the U.S. Capitol. Fleitz said that he was startled to learn that the investigators discovered numerous intelligence documents showing the ICA’s key conclusion – that Russia “developed a clear preference” for Trump and “aspired to help” him win the election—was based on shoddy and fabricated intelligence. When he returned to his West Wing office, Fleitz sat down at his classified computer and wrote a synopsis of the review and gave it to his boss. But Bolton did not, in turn, brief the president. “He didn’t do anything with it. He never told Trump, and I never heard anything about it again,” Fleitz • After Gina Haskell took over the CIA, she locked up all drafts of the House Intelligence Committee report in a gun safe inside a vault in a highly secure room at CIA headquarters until she left office in January 2021. She also impounded all the examiners’ notes and other work materials. “Gina Haspel buried the report,” Harvey Fleitz Additionally knowledgeable sources say that before Haspel left, she demanded that both Barr and Durham keep the report classified and not release any part of it before the 2020 election. “In 2020, Gina Haspel was running around with her hair on fire saying it should never see the light of day,” a former senior official at the Office of the DNI said. “I still cannot believe that she was President Trump's CIA director. It’s totally insane.” In other words, John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, John Durham, and CIA Director Gina Haspel not only obscured exculpatory evidence—they facilitated the overthrow of the U.S. government in 2020. ——————— — A senior CIA intelligence officer, with 10 years of service and top-secret Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) clearance, caught on hidden camera. — The CIA, including Gina Haspel and Mike Pompeo, deliberately withheld intelligence from the sitting President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, during his first administration. Source: James O'Keefe 📝 Meanwhile, in 2018, while the House Intelligence Committee—led by Devin Nunes—had already uncovered Barack Obama’s treasonous conspiracy, CIA Director Mike Pompeo covertly granted Adam Schiff access to raw intelligence logs and communications directly from a small room in Langley, enabling Schiff to use them in an attempt to overthrow the sitting President of the United States. Paul Sperry CIA Director John Ratcliffe FBI Director Kash Patel Source: ——————— Guess who wrote 👇 article back then? “The CIA has made it harder for intelligence about Russia to reach the White House, stoking fears among current and former officials that information is being suppressed to please a president known to erupt in anger whenever he is confronted with bad news about Moscow.”——NATASHA BERTRAND
0:39

Here it is: Fred Fleitz, then National Security Adviser John Bolton’s chief of staff, CONFIRMS: John Durham; John Bolton; Mike Pompeo; and CIA Director Gina Haspel deliberately withheld and buried evidence, including Barack Obama’s manufactured ICA report—not only in the waning days of the Kenyan administration, but also during his presidency—from the sitting president of the United States. Fred Fleitz: “They rigged and politicized the intelligence, and that was obvious to anyone who read that dynamite report. This included William f**king Barr, Durham, Bolton, Pompeo, Haspel, and other Trump appointees who, instead of exposing the scandal, suppressed it.” Fred Fleitz, who was National Security Adviser John Bolton’s chief of staff, heard that investigators at his former employer, the House Intelligence Committee, were probing the raw intelligence in the ICA supporting the assessment's key judgments. A one-time CIA analyst himself, Fleitz was curious to learn what they had found during the previous year, interviewing CIA analysts and reviewing secret documents at Langley. So, he traveled to the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue and read a draft of the highly classified report in a secure room of the U.S. Capitol. Fleitz said that he was startled to learn that the investigators discovered numerous intelligence documents showing the ICA’s key conclusion – that Russia “developed a clear preference” for Trump and “aspired to help” him win the election—was based on shoddy and fabricated intelligence. When he returned to his West Wing office, Fleitz sat down at his classified computer and wrote a synopsis of the review and gave it to his boss. But Bolton did not, in turn, brief the president. “He didn’t do anything with it. He never told Trump, and I never heard anything about it again,” Fleitz • After Gina Haskell took over the CIA, she locked up all drafts of the House Intelligence Committee report in a gun safe inside a vault in a highly secure room at CIA headquarters until she left office in January 2021. She also impounded all the examiners’ notes and other work materials. “Gina Haspel buried the report,” Harvey Fleitz Additionally knowledgeable sources say that before Haspel left, she demanded that both Barr and Durham keep the report classified and not release any part of it before the 2020 election. “In 2020, Gina Haspel was running around with her hair on fire saying it should never see the light of day,” a former senior official at the Office of the DNI said. “I still cannot believe that she was President Trump's CIA director. It’s totally insane.” In other words, John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, John Durham, and CIA Director Gina Haspel not only obscured exculpatory evidence—they facilitated the overthrow of the U.S. government in 2020. ——————— — A senior CIA intelligence officer, with 10 years of service and top-secret Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) clearance, caught on hidden camera. — The CIA, including Gina Haspel and Mike Pompeo, deliberately withheld intelligence from the sitting President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, during his first administration. Source: James O'Keefe 📝 Meanwhile, in 2018, while the House Intelligence Committee—led by Devin Nunes—had already uncovered Barack Obama’s treasonous conspiracy, CIA Director Mike Pompeo covertly granted Adam Schiff access to raw intelligence logs and communications directly from a small room in Langley, enabling Schiff to use them in an attempt to overthrow the sitting President of the United States. Paul Sperry CIA Director John Ratcliffe FBI Director Kash Patel Source: ——————— Guess who wrote 👇 article back then? “The CIA has made it harder for intelligence about Russia to reach the White House, stoking fears among current and former officials that information is being suppressed to please a president known to erupt in anger whenever he is confronted with bad news about Moscow.”——NATASHA BERTRAND

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

36,497 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 CIA STAGES INTERNAL COUP: Snatches JFK & MK-Ultra Files from Tulsi Gabbard’s Office While Trump Is Abroad—They Think We’re Too Weak to Stop Them! ☠️ THE CIA JUST DECLARED ITSELF ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION. While President Trump was overseas, the Agency marched into DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s secure facilities and seized roughly 40 boxes of JFK assassination files and MK-Ultra documents—records already under presidential executive order for full declassification and actively being processed for Congress. This wasn’t bureaucratic clumsiness. CIA whistleblower James Erdman III testified under oath that the same agency now scrambling to contain the Fauci/COVID-origin fallout is hoarding its own historical sins to protect far darker operational secrets. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna called it exactly what it is: an internal coup. The CIA does not believe it reports to the DNI. It views the elected President as a mere four-year speed bump and the American people as subjects who must never see the full ledger. Scholars of the Republic have warned since the National Security Act of 1947: an intelligence apparatus without genuine civilian mastery becomes a praetorian guard that chooses which truths its masters may know. Compartmentalization, revolving doors to contractors, and the arrogant creed that “we are the adults in the room” have produced exactly what the Founders feared most—a permanent, unaccountable state within the state. The Republic does not survive when its intelligence arm treats declassification demands as optional and oversight as theater. Luna has given them 24 hours to return every box or face a subpoena. The moment is now. Either the elected government reasserts command—or we admit the shadows already rule. The files belong to the people. Release them. All of them. Or admit the coup succeeded #CIAInternalCoup #ReleaseTheFiles #JFKTruth #MKUltraExposed #DeepStateCoup #TulsiVsTheShadows #TrumpDeclassifyNow #FauciCoverUp #EndThePraetorians #RepublicNotEmpire
7:38

🚨 CIA STAGES INTERNAL COUP: Snatches JFK & MK-Ultra Files from Tulsi Gabbard’s Office While Trump Is Abroad—They Think We’re Too Weak to Stop Them! ☠️ THE CIA JUST DECLARED ITSELF ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION. While President Trump was overseas, the Agency marched into DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s secure facilities and seized roughly 40 boxes of JFK assassination files and MK-Ultra documents—records already under presidential executive order for full declassification and actively being processed for Congress. This wasn’t bureaucratic clumsiness. CIA whistleblower James Erdman III testified under oath that the same agency now scrambling to contain the Fauci/COVID-origin fallout is hoarding its own historical sins to protect far darker operational secrets. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna called it exactly what it is: an internal coup. The CIA does not believe it reports to the DNI. It views the elected President as a mere four-year speed bump and the American people as subjects who must never see the full ledger. Scholars of the Republic have warned since the National Security Act of 1947: an intelligence apparatus without genuine civilian mastery becomes a praetorian guard that chooses which truths its masters may know. Compartmentalization, revolving doors to contractors, and the arrogant creed that “we are the adults in the room” have produced exactly what the Founders feared most—a permanent, unaccountable state within the state. The Republic does not survive when its intelligence arm treats declassification demands as optional and oversight as theater. Luna has given them 24 hours to return every box or face a subpoena. The moment is now. Either the elected government reasserts command—or we admit the shadows already rule. The files belong to the people. Release them. All of them. Or admit the coup succeeded #CIAInternalCoup #ReleaseTheFiles #JFKTruth #MKUltraExposed #DeepStateCoup #TulsiVsTheShadows #TrumpDeclassifyNow #FauciCoverUp #EndThePraetorians #RepublicNotEmpire

Tony Seruga

26,526 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

At Wednesday’s Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Senator Mark Warner pressed Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard on the fact that her 2026 Annual Threat Assessment contains no mention of foreign election interference for the first time since 2017. Warner treated this as a scandal, evidence that the intelligence community has been muzzled by the Trump administration. Gabbard deflected, saying the assessment “matches the prioritization of threats.” Warner shot back, sarcastically, “I would draw the conclusion there must be no foreign threat to our elections in 2026.” It’s probably the right conclusion. The evidence for foreign interference in U.S. elections was always thin, the response to it was wildly disproportionate, and the infrastructure built to “counter” it did far more damage to American democracy than the interference itself ever did. As I testified before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government in March 2023, and again in November 2023, the “foreign interference” narrative became the predicate for a domestic censorship operation of extraordinary scope, one that Alex Gutentag and I have spent three years documenting at Public, and which we named the Censorship Industrial Complex. Removing the topic from the threat assessment is a long-overdue correction. Gabbard should have said so plainly and directly.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the story, and watch the full video!
1:34

At Wednesday’s Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Senator Mark Warner pressed Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard on the fact that her 2026 Annual Threat Assessment contains no mention of foreign election interference for the first time since 2017. Warner treated this as a scandal, evidence that the intelligence community has been muzzled by the Trump administration. Gabbard deflected, saying the assessment “matches the prioritization of threats.” Warner shot back, sarcastically, “I would draw the conclusion there must be no foreign threat to our elections in 2026.” It’s probably the right conclusion. The evidence for foreign interference in U.S. elections was always thin, the response to it was wildly disproportionate, and the infrastructure built to “counter” it did far more damage to American democracy than the interference itself ever did. As I testified before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government in March 2023, and again in November 2023, the “foreign interference” narrative became the predicate for a domestic censorship operation of extraordinary scope, one that Alex Gutentag and I have spent three years documenting at Public, and which we named the Censorship Industrial Complex. Removing the topic from the threat assessment is a long-overdue correction. Gabbard should have said so plainly and directly.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the story, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

29,852 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Straight To The Point: The Case Against Comey This week, former FBI Director James Comey's legal team took their best shot at getting his criminal indictment dismissed. The evidence released FBI Director Kash Patel includes FBI 'burn bags' containing sensitive records about the Trump probes. The evidence is credible and could prove hard to overcome if Comey's case goes to trial. I spoke with six former FBI special agents. Between them, they have more than 9 decades of law enforcement experience. They said the FBI Trump probes were not done “By The Book.” LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios ⁃ “Burn Bags” discovered at FBI HQ contained sensitive and classified records including Mar-a-Lago, January 6 and the Russia collusion probes. A former FBI agent called it “nefarious.” - Classified CIA referral about alleged ‘Clinton Plan’ found in storage closet adjacent to FBI Director’s office - FBI Leak Investigation codenamed ARCTIC HAZE alleges ‘investigator-level’ briefing to press about Comey’s handling of Clinton email probe - Former FBI Special Agent “If it’s not illegal, I don’t know what is.” - Columbia Law professor acted as Comey's de-facto personal PR rep - Connecting the Dots: Susan Rice January 2017 email claimed FBI and Intelligence Russia probes were done “by the book” - News reports were wrongly used to justify surveillance warrants for Trump campaign aide. Former agents said it deviated from FBI investigative standards. 02:00 FBI ‘Burn Bags' evidence revealed in Comey criminal prosecution 03:50 Former FBI agent suggests a potential whistleblower wanted to records preserved and discovered 05:10 CIA intelligence about 2016 presidential election found in storage closet near Director’s office 06:15 Connecting the dots: In 2016, CIA intelligence alleged potential ‘Clinton Plan’ to damage candidate Trump 08:00 FBI leak investigation alleges ‘investigator-level briefing” for reporters on Clinton email case 09:40 Surveillance warrant application cited media reports for national security court. Not standard. 12:10 DNI Clapper email: we all need to be on the same page. NSA Director pushes back, “took a lot of courage.” 13:30 National Security Adviser Susan Rice 2017 email: claims investigations ‘by the book.’ 14:40 FBI ARCTIC FROST investigation: GOP phone toll records collected. Retired FBI agent said toll records are intrusive. 16:30 Alleged coordination FBI, DOJ and intelligence community
17:50

Straight To The Point: The Case Against Comey This week, former FBI Director James Comey's legal team took their best shot at getting his criminal indictment dismissed. The evidence released FBI Director Kash Patel includes FBI 'burn bags' containing sensitive records about the Trump probes. The evidence is credible and could prove hard to overcome if Comey's case goes to trial. I spoke with six former FBI special agents. Between them, they have more than 9 decades of law enforcement experience. They said the FBI Trump probes were not done “By The Book.” LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios ⁃ “Burn Bags” discovered at FBI HQ contained sensitive and classified records including Mar-a-Lago, January 6 and the Russia collusion probes. A former FBI agent called it “nefarious.” - Classified CIA referral about alleged ‘Clinton Plan’ found in storage closet adjacent to FBI Director’s office - FBI Leak Investigation codenamed ARCTIC HAZE alleges ‘investigator-level’ briefing to press about Comey’s handling of Clinton email probe - Former FBI Special Agent “If it’s not illegal, I don’t know what is.” - Columbia Law professor acted as Comey's de-facto personal PR rep - Connecting the Dots: Susan Rice January 2017 email claimed FBI and Intelligence Russia probes were done “by the book” - News reports were wrongly used to justify surveillance warrants for Trump campaign aide. Former agents said it deviated from FBI investigative standards. 02:00 FBI ‘Burn Bags' evidence revealed in Comey criminal prosecution 03:50 Former FBI agent suggests a potential whistleblower wanted to records preserved and discovered 05:10 CIA intelligence about 2016 presidential election found in storage closet near Director’s office 06:15 Connecting the dots: In 2016, CIA intelligence alleged potential ‘Clinton Plan’ to damage candidate Trump 08:00 FBI leak investigation alleges ‘investigator-level briefing” for reporters on Clinton email case 09:40 Surveillance warrant application cited media reports for national security court. Not standard. 12:10 DNI Clapper email: we all need to be on the same page. NSA Director pushes back, “took a lot of courage.” 13:30 National Security Adviser Susan Rice 2017 email: claims investigations ‘by the book.’ 14:40 FBI ARCTIC FROST investigation: GOP phone toll records collected. Retired FBI agent said toll records are intrusive. 16:30 Alleged coordination FBI, DOJ and intelligence community

Catherine Herridge

2,034,811 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten