Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

BREAKING: Elon Musk joined the All-In Summit today virtually. He proposed that leading AI companies test one another’s models before release, so competitors can flag safety concerns. Musk said this peer-review system could begin immediately.

96,668 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

35 Comments

Rosaria Raimondo's profile picture
Rosaria Raimondo1 day ago

Nice

Klay Thompson's profile picture
Klay Thompson1 day ago

A fully open-source, peer-reviewed system is the ultimate way to ensure AI safety. It should have been happening a long time ago.

Clear Surname's profile picture
Clear Surname1 day ago

Elon is annoyed by "the PIXEL"!

DO IT WELL NOW's profile picture
DO IT WELL NOW1 day ago

He did not say when this would start or how it would work.

Dawny's profile picture
Dawny1 day ago

pass the remote

Perseus's profile picture
Perseus1 day ago

We don’t want any reviews or restrictions Elon. We love you but we do not agree with AI “safety”

CryptoForge's profile picture
CryptoForge1 day ago

It is like Pepsi checking the Coca Cola secret formula to see if it is save. Not gonna happen, companies wont share the recipe of their secret sauce for the sake of safety.

Andrea Hatfield🩷's profile picture
Andrea Hatfield🩷1 day ago

Amazing,Elon ❤️ is immensely right 👏🏻

Olo's profile picture
Olo1 day ago

Understand

Dividend Dad's profile picture
Dividend Dad1 day ago

Sus

Hanans Elshabys's profile picture
Hanans Elshabys1 day ago

Well said

GEF_Clothing's profile picture
GEF_Clothing1 day ago

👏

Grandpa Ridge's profile picture
Grandpa Ridge1 day ago

I dunno Elon, are you sure you don't want 80yo's like Bernie Sander, Maxine Waters, John Thune, Chuck Grassle, etc... I bet all of them know exactly what AI is lol

Archie & Gracie's profile picture
Archie & Gracie1 day ago

I bet his is best! Just sayin’!

Asta's profile picture
Asta1 day ago

That's actually a great idea what about collaboration with the east and west this would be amazing

SquintyEyeGoose's profile picture
SquintyEyeGoose1 day ago

Makes to much sense Will never pass because of this

Samantha Praznovsky's profile picture
Samantha Praznovsky1 day ago

We hope to see more coming

Vivian Nguyen's profile picture
Vivian Nguyen1 day ago

🚀💪

Aung's profile picture
Aung1 day ago

So stupid

Austin Marley's profile picture
Austin Marley1 day ago

Elon there was a reason for being in this earth your purpose on earth is just beginning

Sam🦄Smith's profile picture
Sam🦄Smith1 day ago

He looks healthy and well rested there.

Karyn Holt's profile picture
Karyn Holt1 day ago

Yes, truth test!!!

zaca369's profile picture
zaca3691 day ago

La idea no es mala, pero dudo mucho que se tengan tanta confianza entre ellos.

Sleeping Beauty's profile picture
Sleeping Beauty1 day ago

💯👍❤️

Gregory Jay White's profile picture
Gregory Jay White1 day ago

Great idea....

GIGATRUMP's profile picture
GIGATRUMP1 day ago

They can test each other. I’ll grade them.

Bullish Humanity's profile picture
Bullish Humanity1 day ago

Nobody gives a rat's ass they just humor this guy because he's a criminal it's like criminal godfather speaking at a legitimate conference you don't want to piss him off

william's profile picture
william1 day ago

Peer review 😂😂😂 academic showed us what a scam it is

mrmillion's profile picture
mrmillion1 day ago

👀

Shelley Davis's profile picture
Shelley Davis1 day ago

That is an excellent solution.

Peter's profile picture
Peter1 day ago

AI同行评审:你先检查我的毁灭人类方案,我再检查你的。

Starlight's profile picture
Starlight1 day ago

The born God given…..and able leader ⚔️💪💫

Jet's profile picture
Jet1 day ago

他是想蒸馏同行吧

J's profile picture
J1 day ago

Ghee, what’s the odds AI escapes from a Chinese AI lab? Something tells me we’ve seen this before!

Jamman's profile picture
Jamman1 day ago

This is the way

Related Videos

Elon Musk says the only people qualified to police a frontier AI model are the competitors trying to beat it: "My recommendation to Demis, because I talked to him for a few hours before he published his piece, was that the most immediate thing that we could do is to have the leading AI companies at least just meet or have some sort of call once every few weeks and just discuss safety and security issues." "That's where I think the competitors can keep each other honest." "I think it's quite difficult for someone in the government who doesn't have a deep technical understanding and isn't driving the frontier of AI to know whether something should be released or not." "However, the competitors, if given sort of a week or two to review a new model, can highlight issues. All the competitors have an incentive to keep the others honest." "So you'd have a system where the model makers would check each other's work." "That would be the moment for government to step in and take action." He has a point. The people building these models are just about the only ones who can tell how dangerous one really is. A regulator who has never trained a model cannot make that call. Will rivals reviewing rivals hold up over time? Nobody knows. It has never been tried. And the alternative today is nothing. No calls between the labs, no review windows, nobody outside a lab looking at a model before it ships. So run the reviews. Even an imperfect check beats what exists now, and it would be the first real piece of the assurance layer that still has to be built. Source: Elon Musk (Elon Musk), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on The Economist (The Economist). P.S. That missing assurance layer is what the AI Assurance & Governance Summit 2026 is being built around. On October 1 at the Stanford Faculty Club in Palo Alto, brings frontier labs, regulated industries, insurers, investors, and researchers into one single-track room for exactly this question. Register here:

Karl Mehta

29,709 views • 1 month ago