Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

BREAKING: JACK SMITH UNDER OATH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation.”

Brian Allen

301,065 subscribers

1,006,650 views • 21 hours ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

14 Comments

صادق عبدالرزاق العامرى (2)21 hours ago

The law does not distinguish between a president and a citizen; criminal allegations are determined by evidence and judicial proceedings, not by political office. The final truth is determined by the judiciary in accordance with the law... #Rule_of_Law #Justice #Accountability

Cara DeCarlo-Wirscham20 hours ago

We know. So what happens now? Nothing.

BlueSky Ambassador20 hours ago

🔥 JACK SMITH WALKED INTO THE SENATE HEARING AND LIT THE ROOM UP. He stood by the Trump prosecution. He stood by the evidence. He stood by the conclusion that Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 election was a criminal scheme. And when the pressure came, Smith didn’t fold: “I will not be silenced.” Then Schmitt rolled out a supposed gotcha—only to get the basic facts tangled up. Hawks? Hawkeyes? Atlanta? Maryland? Klobuchar had the perfect response: “You have your teams wrong.” 🤡 That’s the hearing in a nutshell: Smith brought the evidence. Schmitt brought the poster board. 🔥 Stand with Smith. Stand with the rule of law.

David Van Horn21 hours ago

He’s a fucking liar

ZHZ👊🏻🇺🇦🔥20 hours ago

he does serious crimes almost everyday in his second term

sean holland20 hours ago

Someday this guys gonna get a statue while a lotta other guys are gonna get intragenerational shame and infamy

Charles Shafer20 hours ago

😆😂🤣🤦🏼‍♂️ Jack Smith is a lying dirtbag

Paul lenny21 hours ago

Total BS by the left and their sheep. We can see right through your lies.

Lee Scoresby20 hours ago

@iDreamofLadii Keyword: Developed not found.

Laura21 hours ago

@FrankBuckleyTV Looks like Trump will have to put a hit on him—— oops horrible accident

Zypher20 hours ago

This guy is a huge slimeball- hope the put him in prison.

Corey Charity20 hours ago

No shit

j m20 hours ago

This guy is the textbook example of loser

BthechangeUwant2C20 hours ago

PROSECUTE!!

Related Videos

JACK SMITH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

JACK SMITH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

The Tennessee Holler

79,390 views • 8 months ago

"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity." –Jack Smith testifying before Congress.

"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity." –Jack Smith testifying before Congress.

Pod Save America

20,181 views • 8 months ago

Jack Smith: "Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation ... rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power"

Jack Smith: "Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation ... rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power"

Aaron Rupar

2,071,780 views • 23 hours ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

Former special counsel Jack Smith: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

Republicans against Trump

78,167 views • 8 months ago

Jack Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including my decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. The charges against President Trump were the result of the evidence. Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, he engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power.

Jack Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including my decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. The charges against President Trump were the result of the evidence. Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, he engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power.

Headquarters

256,061 views • 21 hours ago

Jack Smith, Special Counsel: I stand by my decisions, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump— it wasn’t political. “It was proven without a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation.”

Jack Smith, Special Counsel: I stand by my decisions, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump— it wasn’t political. “It was proven without a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation.”

MJTruthUltra

36,721 views • 23 hours ago

“Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” former special counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers as he defended his decision to prosecute Trump. Testifying Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Smith said he stands by his decision to bring charges and would do so again based on the same facts, “regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.”

“Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” former special counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers as he defended his decision to prosecute Trump. Testifying Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Smith said he stands by his decision to bring charges and would do so again based on the same facts, “regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.”

CBS News

384,585 views • 22 hours ago

IN THE HEARING ROOM: GOP calls Jack Smith for public hearing Smith unleashes an unequivocal statement about his criminal case against Trump: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump committed serious crimes”

IN THE HEARING ROOM: GOP calls Jack Smith for public hearing Smith unleashes an unequivocal statement about his criminal case against Trump: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump committed serious crimes”

Scott MacFarlane

22,272 views • 22 hours ago

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

FactPost

13,087 views • 8 months ago

BREAKING: Super powerful words from Jack Smith just now: "The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity… No one should be above the law in this country and the law required he be held to account.” Every American needs to hear this

BREAKING: Super powerful words from Jack Smith just now: "The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity… No one should be above the law in this country and the law required he be held to account.” Every American needs to hear this

Brian Krassenstein

513,504 views • 8 months ago

Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican.

Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican.

Acyn

85,091 views • 8 months ago

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

The Bulwark

46,147 views • 8 months ago

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

Republicans against Trump

185,834 views • 9 months ago

Jack Smith: I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases.

Jack Smith: I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases.

Acyn

148,551 views • 9 months ago

JACK SMITH: “Donald Trump willfully broke the law.” “Two separate grand juries supported these findings” “We developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity” “Trump engaged in criminal scheme to overturn results & prevent transfer of power. After leaving office Trump illegally kept classified docs…repeatedly tried to obstruct justice…NATSEC info held in a ballroom & bathroom”

JACK SMITH: “Donald Trump willfully broke the law.” “Two separate grand juries supported these findings” “We developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity” “Trump engaged in criminal scheme to overturn results & prevent transfer of power. After leaving office Trump illegally kept classified docs…repeatedly tried to obstruct justice…NATSEC info held in a ballroom & bathroom”

Maine

29,828 views • 8 months ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith said Tuesday that he stands by his decision to bring charges against President Donald Trump over his mishandling of classified documents and role in the Jan. 6 attack. “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” Smith said during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Smith, who in 2022 led investigations into Trump and secured two indictments, said he made decisions in the case "without regard” for Trump’s “political association activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election.” “If asked whether to prosecute a former president today, based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat,” he said. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, referred Smith to the Justice Department for possible prosecution, alleging that Smith made false statements during an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December. Smith has denied accusations of bias, saying he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. “I stand by my testimony before the House of Representatives, and I will not be silenced by continued threats of prosecution,” he told the committee.

Former special counsel Jack Smith said Tuesday that he stands by his decision to bring charges against President Donald Trump over his mishandling of classified documents and role in the Jan. 6 attack. “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” Smith said during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Smith, who in 2022 led investigations into Trump and secured two indictments, said he made decisions in the case "without regard” for Trump’s “political association activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election.” “If asked whether to prosecute a former president today, based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat,” he said. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, referred Smith to the Justice Department for possible prosecution, alleging that Smith made false statements during an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December. Smith has denied accusations of bias, saying he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. “I stand by my testimony before the House of Representatives, and I will not be silenced by continued threats of prosecution,” he told the committee.

PBS News

25,864 views • 20 hours ago

Jack Smith falsely claims there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt to charge President Trump. His case COLLAPSED. It was all political. 🎥: Congresswoman Laurel Lee

Jack Smith falsely claims there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt to charge President Trump. His case COLLAPSED. It was all political. 🎥: Congresswoman Laurel Lee

House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

134,008 views • 8 months ago

.Rep. Jamie Raskin to Jack Smith: "Everybody here knows what you did wrong in Donald Trump's eyes and why he says you belong in prison...You found proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election."

.Rep. Jamie Raskin to Jack Smith: "Everybody here knows what you did wrong in Donald Trump's eyes and why he says you belong in prison...You found proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election."

CSPAN

208,390 views • 8 months ago

Jack Smith just told the Truth LOUD and CLEAR! “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. “If asked whether to prosecute a former president today based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat. “The charges against President Trump were the result of the evidence. Grand juries in two separate districts reached this conclusion based on his actions, as alleged in the indictments they returned. “Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power. “After leaving office in January of 2021, President Trump illegally kept classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago social club and repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents. “Highly sensitive national security information was held in a bathroom and a ballroom where events and gatherings took place.

Jack Smith just told the Truth LOUD and CLEAR! “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. “If asked whether to prosecute a former president today based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat. “The charges against President Trump were the result of the evidence. Grand juries in two separate districts reached this conclusion based on his actions, as alleged in the indictments they returned. “Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power. “After leaving office in January of 2021, President Trump illegally kept classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago social club and repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents. “Highly sensitive national security information was held in a bathroom and a ballroom where events and gatherings took place.

Brian Krassenstein

445,943 views • 23 hours ago

JACK SMITH: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election, prevent the peaceful transfer of power, retained classified docs, obstructed justice… I’d charge an ex president again regardless of party.”

JACK SMITH: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election, prevent the peaceful transfer of power, retained classified docs, obstructed justice… I’d charge an ex president again regardless of party.”

The Tennessee Holler

234,015 views • 9 months ago