Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Jack Smith falsely claims there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt to charge President Trump. His case COLLAPSED. It was all political. 🎥: Congresswoman Laurel Lee

JudiciaryGOP's profile picture

House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

590,785 subscribers

134,008 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразованиеЗдоровье и велнес
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

JACK SMITH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”
1:26

JACK SMITH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

The Tennessee Holler

79,390 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity." –Jack Smith testifying before Congress.
2:12

"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity." –Jack Smith testifying before Congress.

Pod Save America

20,181 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Jack Smith: I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases.
0:27

Jack Smith: I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases.

Acyn

148,551 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Former special counsel Jack Smith: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”
1:14

Former special counsel Jack Smith: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

Republicans against Trump

78,167 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

JACK SMITH: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election, prevent the peaceful transfer of power, retained classified docs, obstructed justice… I’d charge an ex president again regardless of party.”
2:16

JACK SMITH: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election, prevent the peaceful transfer of power, retained classified docs, obstructed justice… I’d charge an ex president again regardless of party.”

The Tennessee Holler

234,015 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Johnson: “Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false?” Smith: “Yes it did”
0:29

Johnson: “Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false?” Smith: “Yes it did”

The Bulwark

22,349 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.
0:29

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

FactPost

13,087 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This is why the House GOP refused Jack Smith's request that he be allowed to testify in public: Smith said he had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transfer of power. Also, he'd charge him again.
0:27

This is why the House GOP refused Jack Smith's request that he be allowed to testify in public: Smith said he had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transfer of power. Also, he'd charge him again.

Bill Madden

25,462 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.Rep. Jamie Raskin to Jack Smith: "Everybody here knows what you did wrong in Donald Trump's eyes and why he says you belong in prison...You found proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election."
9:19

.Rep. Jamie Raskin to Jack Smith: "Everybody here knows what you did wrong in Donald Trump's eyes and why he says you belong in prison...You found proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election."

CSPAN

208,390 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

MIKE DAVIS: If President Trump was responsible for the January 6th riot, Jack Smith, then why the hell didn't you charge President Trump with inciting the riot? He knows there was zero evidence. There needs to be accountability! JACK SMITH NEEDS TO BE PROSECUTED AND IMPRISONED ASAP! 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸
1:00

MIKE DAVIS: If President Trump was responsible for the January 6th riot, Jack Smith, then why the hell didn't you charge President Trump with inciting the riot? He knows there was zero evidence. There needs to be accountability! JACK SMITH NEEDS TO BE PROSECUTED AND IMPRISONED ASAP! 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Bannon’s WarRoom

129,519 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Today, Jack Smith explained he had enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump tried to overturn the election illegally, tried to get fake electors, and in a separate case, stole classified documents and tried to hide them.
0:54

Today, Jack Smith explained he had enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump tried to overturn the election illegally, tried to get fake electors, and in a separate case, stole classified documents and tried to hide them.

Rep. Ted Lieu

24,281 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Smith: I came to the conclusion we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We were ready, willing and able to go to trial.
0:24

Smith: I came to the conclusion we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We were ready, willing and able to go to trial.

Acyn

37,846 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

HANK JOHNSON: Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false? JACK SMITH: Yes JOHNSON: And did your investigation uncover sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump publicly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him while he privately acknowledged he lost? SMITH: Yes. We cited instances of that JOHNSON: Yet, here we see on the 5th anniversary of the insurrection, the Trump White House propaganda machine is still promoting the stolen election theory on a government webpage
1:43

HANK JOHNSON: Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false? JACK SMITH: Yes JOHNSON: And did your investigation uncover sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump publicly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him while he privately acknowledged he lost? SMITH: Yes. We cited instances of that JOHNSON: Yet, here we see on the 5th anniversary of the insurrection, the Trump White House propaganda machine is still promoting the stolen election theory on a government webpage

Aaron Rupar

316,735 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”
0:32

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

Republicans against Trump

185,834 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Super powerful words from Jack Smith just now: "The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity… No one should be above the law in this country and the law required he be held to account.” Every American needs to hear this
0:41

BREAKING: Super powerful words from Jack Smith just now: "The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity… No one should be above the law in this country and the law required he be held to account.” Every American needs to hear this

Brian Krassenstein

513,391 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Question: Do you believe that the Supreme Court's decision on executive immunity constitutes an exoneration of Trump’s conduct? Smith: I don't think it was an exoneration because I still believed that there was substantial evidence that would allow us to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
2:30

Question: Do you believe that the Supreme Court's decision on executive immunity constitutes an exoneration of Trump’s conduct? Smith: I don't think it was an exoneration because I still believed that there was substantial evidence that would allow us to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

Acyn

312,218 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican.
0:57

Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican.

Acyn

85,083 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Jack Smith makes the huge mistake of appearing publicly and brazenly saying his fraudulent charges against President Trump, that were all dismissed, were not political. The lawfare against Trump was 100% political. Smith should get life in prison.
1:39

Jack Smith makes the huge mistake of appearing publicly and brazenly saying his fraudulent charges against President Trump, that were all dismissed, were not political. The lawfare against Trump was 100% political. Smith should get life in prison.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

99,653 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”
0:36

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

The Bulwark

46,147 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.
1:24

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

PBS News

13,485 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад