Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

#BREAKING: Liz Oyer: “I was shocked to hear Mr Blanche’s testimony about this yesterday. What he said about my firing is provably false. His claim that it had nothing to do with the concerns I raised is contradicted by documents and evidence. His claim that he tried to call...

Emolclause's profile picture

Emoluments Clause

118,669 subscribers

263,558 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics#BREAKING
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Former DOJ Employee Elizabeth Oyer: "Mr. Blanche said yesterday that the settlement fund is dead. It is not. That is contract law 101. Mr. Trump or his sons could seek to enforce it at anytime."
0:59

Former DOJ Employee Elizabeth Oyer: "Mr. Blanche said yesterday that the settlement fund is dead. It is not. That is contract law 101. Mr. Trump or his sons could seek to enforce it at anytime."

The Bulwark

230,524 views • 1 month ago

Oyer: "I had great hope Blanche would be an effective leader and responsible steward of the DOJ, but he quickly proved me wrong. Two days after Blanche was confirmed as deputy AG, he fired me from my position as DOJ's career pardon attorney. I declined to rubber stamp a political favor for a friend of the president, and it cost me my job. Mr Blanche's office had asked me to restore the gun rights of a convicted domestic abuser ... I was shocked to hear Blanche's testimony about this yesterday. What he said about my firing is provably false."
2:54

Oyer: "I had great hope Blanche would be an effective leader and responsible steward of the DOJ, but he quickly proved me wrong. Two days after Blanche was confirmed as deputy AG, he fired me from my position as DOJ's career pardon attorney. I declined to rubber stamp a political favor for a friend of the president, and it cost me my job. Mr Blanche's office had asked me to restore the gun rights of a convicted domestic abuser ... I was shocked to hear Blanche's testimony about this yesterday. What he said about my firing is provably false."

Aaron Rupar

173,203 views • 1 month ago

#BREAKING: MY Nicolle: “Are you more AFRAID now than before you testified against @DAGToddBlanche?” Liz Oyer: “YES. He’s, you know, at this point, one of the most powerful people in the country, and he stands to get potentially even more powerful if he’s confirmed, and I’m well aware that I’ve sort of pitted myself against…as an opponent of this incredibly powerful man, who’s proven that he is vindictive and lies, and you know, I just don’t know what he’s capable of, and it is genuinely VERY SCARY. But I’m more scared of what his leadership will do to our justice system. We all rely on a justice system that is fair and impartial to protect our civil rights, to keep us safe, and Mr. Blanche is a real threat to that, so the risk of testifying against him, in my mind…was no brainer, it was worth taking.” 😢
1:00

#BREAKING: MY Nicolle: “Are you more AFRAID now than before you testified against @DAGToddBlanche?” Liz Oyer: “YES. He’s, you know, at this point, one of the most powerful people in the country, and he stands to get potentially even more powerful if he’s confirmed, and I’m well aware that I’ve sort of pitted myself against…as an opponent of this incredibly powerful man, who’s proven that he is vindictive and lies, and you know, I just don’t know what he’s capable of, and it is genuinely VERY SCARY. But I’m more scared of what his leadership will do to our justice system. We all rely on a justice system that is fair and impartial to protect our civil rights, to keep us safe, and Mr. Blanche is a real threat to that, so the risk of testifying against him, in my mind…was no brainer, it was worth taking.” 😢

Emoluments Clause

62,911 views • 1 month ago

Perryman: This is yet another example of Todd Blanche not being willing to give sworn testimony in a courtroom, even if it means the DOJ loses. Well, it’s quite remarkable that you have a DOJ that is willing to make statements to a court in its briefing that it’s not willing to swear to. If you’re making these representations as an officer of the court, then why is it too much to ask that you make them under penalty of perjury? And this is something the DOJ has not been willing to do.
1:03

Perryman: This is yet another example of Todd Blanche not being willing to give sworn testimony in a courtroom, even if it means the DOJ loses. Well, it’s quite remarkable that you have a DOJ that is willing to make statements to a court in its briefing that it’s not willing to swear to. If you’re making these representations as an officer of the court, then why is it too much to ask that you make them under penalty of perjury? And this is something the DOJ has not been willing to do.

Acyn

65,970 views • 2 months ago

#BREAKING: Liz Oyer: “Two days after Mr Blanche was confirmed as deputy attorney general, he fired me from my position as the department’s career pardon attorney. I declined to rubber stamp a political favor for a friend of the president and it cost me my job. Mr Blanche’s office had asked me to recommend restoring the gun ownership rights of a convicted domestic abuser. I raised concerns about public safety but Mr Blanche’s staff pressured me to go along anyway. I did not, but because this particular domestic abuser had a personal relationship with the president, Mr Blanche’s staff asked me to set aside my concerns. When I wouldn’t, Mr Blanche fired me within hours. He then took extraordinary measures to silence me. He sent US marshals to my home in an effort to prevent me from speaking with members of Congress.” 😳
0:55

#BREAKING: Liz Oyer: “Two days after Mr Blanche was confirmed as deputy attorney general, he fired me from my position as the department’s career pardon attorney. I declined to rubber stamp a political favor for a friend of the president and it cost me my job. Mr Blanche’s office had asked me to recommend restoring the gun ownership rights of a convicted domestic abuser. I raised concerns about public safety but Mr Blanche’s staff pressured me to go along anyway. I did not, but because this particular domestic abuser had a personal relationship with the president, Mr Blanche’s staff asked me to set aside my concerns. When I wouldn’t, Mr Blanche fired me within hours. He then took extraordinary measures to silence me. He sent US marshals to my home in an effort to prevent me from speaking with members of Congress.” 😳

Emoluments Clause

18,564 views • 1 month ago

Former Pardon Attorney: A federal judge found that Mr. Blanche personally misled this Congress about the department's settlement agreement with Trump. To the public, it looks like Mr. Blanche is running the Justice Department as Trump's personal law firm. Blanche has repeatedly placed Trump's interests ahead of the interests of the country. The settlement agreement is a perfect example. It protects the entire Trump family and all of their businesses from any investigation forever. It gives away $2 billion of our money for no reason at all.
1:33

Former Pardon Attorney: A federal judge found that Mr. Blanche personally misled this Congress about the department's settlement agreement with Trump. To the public, it looks like Mr. Blanche is running the Justice Department as Trump's personal law firm. Blanche has repeatedly placed Trump's interests ahead of the interests of the country. The settlement agreement is a perfect example. It protects the entire Trump family and all of their businesses from any investigation forever. It gives away $2 billion of our money for no reason at all.

Headquarters

71,130 views • 1 month ago

Phang: What I want is the DOJ to follow the law. And what we have seen time and time again is this act of concealment and cover up by this DOJ to not release this information. I also want the files that Todd Blanche continues to sit on.
1:53

Phang: What I want is the DOJ to follow the law. And what we have seen time and time again is this act of concealment and cover up by this DOJ to not release this information. I also want the files that Todd Blanche continues to sit on.

Acyn

75,398 views • 18 days ago

Senator Thom Tillis: "Mr. Blanche said very quickly yesterday that he would meet with the Epstein victims today if it could be arranged...I expect that meeting to occur before I'm willing to vote out of this committee. And I'm trying to get to 'yes,' but this is a very important part of getting to 'yes.'"
1:07

Sensitive content

Senator Thom Tillis: "Mr. Blanche said very quickly yesterday that he would meet with the Epstein victims today if it could be arranged...I expect that meeting to occur before I'm willing to vote out of this committee. And I'm trying to get to 'yes,' but this is a very important part of getting to 'yes.'"

Home of the Brave

22,168 views • 1 month ago

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”
1:09

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

RedWave Press

212,892 views • 4 months ago

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”
1:09

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

Dr Charlie Ward

162,094 views • 22 days ago

.Senator John Cornyn: They've been consistent about their assertion on behalf of the USA that the weaponization fund is dead...Given this agreement with Mr. Blanche, I expect the Department to live up to this in future litigation and I will vote to advance him out of the committee today.
5:51

.Senator John Cornyn: They've been consistent about their assertion on behalf of the USA that the weaponization fund is dead...Given this agreement with Mr. Blanche, I expect the Department to live up to this in future litigation and I will vote to advance him out of the committee today.

CSPAN

29,794 views • 28 days ago

Wow! Cory Booker seems to have just shown that Todd Blanche lied under oath, when he claimed he couldn't meet with the survivor without their lawyers present. "Then came the request of meeting with the survivors. For weeks, Mr. Blanche insisted he could not meet with them unless their attorneys were present. This was not true. A first-year law student knows that this is not true. His own department's policies and federal law make that clear. And when he finally did meet with them, the survivors, because a Republican senator demanded he do it, the survivors described the meeting as disappointing. They said they felt gaslit. They said they were skipped over. They said Mr. Blanche was condescending to the survivors of sexual assault. "But we know that he rushed to the situation room for high-level members of the Trump administration to strategize on how to protect the president. It is another clear example that the person he is there to protect is Donald Trump."
1:08

Wow! Cory Booker seems to have just shown that Todd Blanche lied under oath, when he claimed he couldn't meet with the survivor without their lawyers present. "Then came the request of meeting with the survivors. For weeks, Mr. Blanche insisted he could not meet with them unless their attorneys were present. This was not true. A first-year law student knows that this is not true. His own department's policies and federal law make that clear. And when he finally did meet with them, the survivors, because a Republican senator demanded he do it, the survivors described the meeting as disappointing. They said they felt gaslit. They said they were skipped over. They said Mr. Blanche was condescending to the survivors of sexual assault. "But we know that he rushed to the situation room for high-level members of the Trump administration to strategize on how to protect the president. It is another clear example that the person he is there to protect is Donald Trump."

Ed Krassenstein

83,173 views • 1 month ago

Blanche: it's absolutely false to suggest that this DOJ is not executing as we should in doing the right thing every single day. Whitehouse: I will tell you that you are wrong, that in the history of the department, this kind of criticism by federal judges is unprecedented. And it comes from judges of every different political persuasion.
1:12

Blanche: it's absolutely false to suggest that this DOJ is not executing as we should in doing the right thing every single day. Whitehouse: I will tell you that you are wrong, that in the history of the department, this kind of criticism by federal judges is unprecedented. And it comes from judges of every different political persuasion.

Acyn

53,478 views • 1 month ago

Epstein survivor: The question is whether Todd Blanche has demonstrated the judgment, independence, and fidelity to the rule of law required to serve as Attorney General of the United States. I respectfully submit that he has not. My name is Liz Stein. This is not a political issue for us. It is based on the Department of Justice's failure to faithfully implement the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
2:05

Epstein survivor: The question is whether Todd Blanche has demonstrated the judgment, independence, and fidelity to the rule of law required to serve as Attorney General of the United States. I respectfully submit that he has not. My name is Liz Stein. This is not a political issue for us. It is based on the Department of Justice's failure to faithfully implement the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Headquarters

28,324 views • 1 month ago

#BREAKING: Rep Garcia: “I said this earlier, I’ll say it again. One name that continues to come up as someone who was VERY CLOSE to Mr #Epstein was Larry Summers, former treasury secretary. We have not spoken to Mr Summers yet in our committee but it’s very clear especially to me after today, that Larry Summers is someone that NEEDS to be in front of the Oversight Committee and that we need to hear from him DIRECTLY…It is stunning however that all of these powerful individuals CONTINUED to interact with Epstein’s EVEN AFTER knowing what he had done.”😳
0:31

#BREAKING: Rep Garcia: “I said this earlier, I’ll say it again. One name that continues to come up as someone who was VERY CLOSE to Mr #Epstein was Larry Summers, former treasury secretary. We have not spoken to Mr Summers yet in our committee but it’s very clear especially to me after today, that Larry Summers is someone that NEEDS to be in front of the Oversight Committee and that we need to hear from him DIRECTLY…It is stunning however that all of these powerful individuals CONTINUED to interact with Epstein’s EVEN AFTER knowing what he had done.”😳

Emoluments Clause

41,075 views • 2 months ago

Sen. Dick Durbin: Prior to this hearing, Mr. Blanche told me he made a mistake by creating the January 6th slush fund. With witnesses and my staff to what I'm about to say, when I asked him about this under oath, Mr. Blanche falsely claimed that he never made this statement. That's not true. Mr. Blanche's willingness to casually lie under oath about a statement he made in a room full of witnesses shows the lengths he will go to avoid offending Trump.
2:10

Sen. Dick Durbin: Prior to this hearing, Mr. Blanche told me he made a mistake by creating the January 6th slush fund. With witnesses and my staff to what I'm about to say, when I asked him about this under oath, Mr. Blanche falsely claimed that he never made this statement. That's not true. Mr. Blanche's willingness to casually lie under oath about a statement he made in a room full of witnesses shows the lengths he will go to avoid offending Trump.

Headquarters

130,582 views • 28 days ago

Cornyn: "As to the idea it could be revived in the future, I think it's highly unlikely that could happen without the cooperation of the DOJ. And I think Mr Blanche gave us the assurances that it was dead and would not be revived and in this case we have no alternative but to take his word" 🙃
0:41

Cornyn: "As to the idea it could be revived in the future, I think it's highly unlikely that could happen without the cooperation of the DOJ. And I think Mr Blanche gave us the assurances that it was dead and would not be revived and in this case we have no alternative but to take his word" 🙃

Aaron Rupar

147,256 views • 28 days ago

Sen. Senator Mazie Hirono: Mr. Blanche, a reporter asked you about Trump's desire to see his perceived political enemies prosecuted. Do you believe it is his right and duty to order the investigation or prosecution of his perceived enemies? Acting AG Todd Blanche: I can't answer that yes or no.
0:43

Sen. Senator Mazie Hirono: Mr. Blanche, a reporter asked you about Trump's desire to see his perceived political enemies prosecuted. Do you believe it is his right and duty to order the investigation or prosecution of his perceived enemies? Acting AG Todd Blanche: I can't answer that yes or no.

Headquarters

62,185 views • 1 month ago