Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨BREAKING: Michael Knowles says he won't moderate a debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson. "The evidence is pretty clear Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk." "I am certainly convinced that the guilt for Charlie's murder should be adjudicated with gravity and sobriety in a court of law rather than...

259,211 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

40 Yorum

SNEAKO profil fotoğrafı
SNEAKO1 ay önce

Shabbos goy fed. I’ll moderate it.

captive dreamer profil fotoğrafı
captive dreamer1 ay önce

Good for him

Jinet Gharibian profil fotoğrafı
Jinet Gharibian1 ay önce

I can’t believe he actually thought for a second that Candace would give that money to Charlie’s kids. The money isn’t going to the person who wins the debate, it’s going straight into Candace’s bank account just for agreeing to debate. The purpose is to save sane people from CO.

KanekoaTheGreat profil fotoğrafı
KanekoaTheGreat1 ay önce

Still a good suggestion. Candace should give the money to Charlie's kids.

E. Locke profil fotoğrafı
E. Locke1 ay önce

@Jinet_Gharibian Charlie's kids have plenty of money. There should be no money involved. Just debate. But it won't happen. Mucked up beyond repair - all for "social media". It sucks.

Cornucopia profil fotoğrafı
Cornucopia1 ay önce

@SandSteelCotton @KanekoaTheGreat Your reading comprehension is utter dog shit.

Wesley R Morrison profil fotoğrafı
Wesley R Morrison1 ay önce

Knowles has quality moments, but he’s been a coward on this front.

Jacktron profil fotoğrafı
Jacktron1 ay önce

While I understand his position I don’t agree with it. Candace has been spreading lie after lie about Erika and TPUSA, accusing them of being complicit in his murder. That has caused them to have to beef up their security because of her psychotic audience. For the sake of sanity and the safety of Charlie’s family, these lies have to be debunked.

KanekoaTheGreat profil fotoğrafı
KanekoaTheGreat1 ay önce

I believe Michael is godfather to one of Candace’s children, so he may have personal reasons for staying out of it beyond what he’s saying publicly. But I agree: if more people with larger platforms had called out Candace’s lies earlier, they wouldn’t have spread nearly as far. A lot of people claim to have been friends with Charlie, yet they’ve stayed silent while Candace and a dozen podcasters spent 10 months riling up millions of people to slander and dehumanize his widow and closest friends.

Jacktron profil fotoğrafı
Jacktron1 ay önce

People like Megyn Kelly have still refused to call her out.

Sakura profil fotoğrafı
Sakura1 ay önce

He works with Ben Shapiro. There was no chance he was going to be able to moderate it.

G SHREDDington profil fotoğrafı
G SHREDDington1 ay önce

“Sorry Andrew, no can do”

Block1 Capital profil fotoğrafı
Block1 Capital1 ay önce

Michael Knowles makes $200,000–$400,000 per year working for the Daily Wire founded by Zionist Orthodox Jew Ben Shapiro.

Michaela profil fotoğrafı
Michaela1 ay önce

This is so fucked up and a shame as a friend of Candace fuck Knowles he’s a sell out anyhow

Gracie Hannah profil fotoğrafı
Gracie Hannah1 ay önce

@MartinaMis12 Yeah, the smart people know better.

Mozhead profil fotoğrafı
Mozhead1 ay önce

This dude has zero interest in finding the truth. I don't know if Candace is motivated by greed, but if it leads to the truth I am glad she is greedy.

Salmon Slayr profil fotoğrafı
Salmon Slayr1 ay önce

Why do you think it got a lot of views Michael? We’ll let me tell you. Because anyone who followed this closely and watched a handful of the assassination videos along with all the TPUSA lies by staff and Erika knows the Fed Slop narrative is bull shit.

Hořící Drak profil fotoğrafı
Hořící Drak1 ay önce

This is the right call Michael. Cancer Owens and her LOW IQ audience deserved to be ignored. "Hear me out, Hear me out......it was the Jooooooos"

Kate profil fotoğrafı
Kate1 ay önce

Of course he won't. He will never go against Candace. He waited months to even slightly push back and won't ever completely condemn her. Another coward.

Jen Hanrahan profil fotoğrafı
Jen Hanrahan1 ay önce

Ben My boss said I had to say the evidence is overwhelming, especially that 4k crystal clear footage of him taking the shot changing clothes, dropping a screw driver and sprinting from the scene.

Stephen Spurling Is... @Drangula profil fotoğrafı
Stephen Spurling Is... @Drangula1 ay önce

I'd rather hear from @michaeljknowles over @paleochristcon on what he finds so compelling about the state's case against Tyler Robinson. Knowles is far more credible, but what is he thinking? The blurry photos, stilted text messages, dubious social media posts, and evidence of his DNA (and that of others) on his own property are proof of Tyler Robinson's guilt? And he confessed! Sure, he's defending himself in court. Sure, he never signed a formal confession. But we know he confessed because the state and Lance Twiggs say so. The trial hasn't even begun, and we can all be certain.

Brendzz profil fotoğrafı
Brendzz1 ay önce

Welp, hope he enjoys his paycheck for this fed slop..

Eric profil fotoğrafı
Eric1 ay önce

He’s the godfather to one of Candace’s kids. He only has a very timid response to Candace so it makes sense. He comes of looking like a coward because he knows Candace would probably look foolish in that debate so in a way he’s protecting her.

ColoradoMom profil fotoğrafı
ColoradoMom1 ay önce

OMG so @michaeljknowles has joined the group of people that believe in guilty until proven innocent and he is willing to send a young man to the chair who may or may NOT be guilty based on what can only be described as evidence with so many reasonable doubts it makes your head spin. I guess he's afraid of @benshapiro ??

Brittany profil fotoğrafı
Brittany1 ay önce

what a homo

HunchoPrime™️ profil fotoğrafı
HunchoPrime™️1 ay önce

of course we knew he won't moderate and no one asked him to anyway ,Andrew Cuckston just threw his name in there .His master Ben jewpiro won't permit him moderate the debate .

Carole Mac profil fotoğrafı
Carole Mac1 ay önce

Another one. 🚫🚫 He definitely got the call.

SaintSoulaan 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
SaintSoulaan 🇺🇸1 ay önce

This definitely came with pressure from Ben Shapiro. If it was truly to “honor Charlie” then he would’ve said this right out of the gate. I think he was seriously considering it, but then the you-know-who’s 🧃put the pressure on him 🤣 Shapiro has been trying to turn him against Candace since the day she was fired from The Daily Wire.

OccultPatriot profil fotoğrafı
OccultPatriot1 ay önce

We’ve heard this before; the evidence is so clear there’s no need to even investigate it or discuss it. #2020StolenElection

Wild🌼Flower profil fotoğrafı
Wild🌼Flower1 ay önce

Wow! I thought we were innocent until proven guilty, @michaeljknowles ??? “Mr. Constitutionalist.” 🙄

Duane.touchet52 profil fotoğrafı
Duane.touchet521 ay önce

If it is so certain then they should absolutely destroy Candace. But this speaks volumes to Candace being right!

Christopher Howard profil fotoğrafı
Christopher Howard1 ay önce

But....why not view this as an opportunity for Candace' arguments to be challenged / shut down?

Julia profil fotoğrafı
Julia1 ay önce

Never pegged @michaeljknowles as a controlled opposition, sellout gaslighter. Got that one wrong.

Mouthy8itch👉🏻😼 profil fotoğrafı
Mouthy8itch👉🏻😼1 ay önce

"leave it to the court of law and just accept fedslop"

Sammy Alton profil fotoğrafı
Sammy Alton1 ay önce

Reminder: They want us to believe a 30.06 soft point round coming in at 1,720 mph with a calculated impact force of 2,050 pounds was completely absorbed by Charlie's neck and did not cause a blowout wound or at a minimum even push him over backwards? ABSOLUTE NONSENSE!

Stephanie Bennett profil fotoğrafı
Stephanie Bennett1 ay önce

The only thing Candace wants is justice for Charlie. Prove her wrong if you can. I’m not convinced he was shot. I didn’t see someone with a weapon in his pants. The pieces of the puzzle should fit.

Alaska Pants profil fotoğrafı
Alaska Pants1 ay önce

Knowles works for Ben Shapiro. But I’m sure that has nothing to do with this. 🤣🤣

Youssra Abdellaoui profil fotoğrafı
Youssra Abdellaoui1 ay önce

Lucrative or not, the fact that her podcast gained popularity is because people agree with her and interested in her findings. So should Knowles be. I hope this weakling is no longer Candace's kid's godfather.

Misty profil fotoğrafı
Misty1 ay önce

You obviously have not done your own research into any of this… ask more questions - that’s what Charlie deserves and would have also done had one of his friends been murdered. The narrative for Tyler is being pushed - it’s more obvious that there is a real coverup going on.

ChrisMarie profil fotoğrafı
ChrisMarie1 ay önce

So Michael, you could’ve handled that so much differently by literally just saying .. I just don’t wanna get involved here, end of story but you didn’t and why is that? You had to very specifically go and say that there’s overwhelming evid. that TR blanked CK. Lost credibility…

Benzer Videolar

Charlie Kirk used to ask me to research and write about topics, and he often shared my work. What I've watched Candace Owens do since his murder is even more vile than the leftists who celebrated it. She has devoted herself to defending the man accused of killing Charlie while relentlessly attacking Charlie's widow, his friends, and the organization he dedicated his life to, all while claiming to be fighting for justice in Charlie's name. She has inverted the facts, built a wildly profitable media narrative on lies about his murder, and cast herself as the only person who ever truly cared about him, as if his family and loved ones did not. She has distorted the evidence against Tyler Robinson again and again, spun self-serving fairy tales about Egyptian planes, French Legionnaires, Brigitte Macron, and more, and convinced millions to believe them. At one point she argued that the U.S. government, Israel, and Brigitte Macron were tied to the murder because an Egyptian aircraft landed at a Delaware hangar used by a French aviation company, an Israeli firm held shares in it, and some unidentified person drove to a government building. She has not offered a shred of evidence for any of it. It has been completely insane. For almost ten months, she has assassinated the character of Charlie's family, friends, and loved ones while pushing narratives that give cover to the man accused of killing him. Having staked out that position so publicly, it would take enormous humility, integrity, and honesty to admit she was wrong. I don't believe that will ever happen. And I expect the attacks to only get worse. It's one of the most disgusting things I've ever watched. It's the ultimate betrayal of everything Charlie Kirk stood for—and I'll keep calling it out, for my friend Charlie.

KanekoaTheGreat

409,811 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

BREAKING: Candace Owens Dances On Charlie Kirk's Grave. What happened to the Egyptian planes, Candace Owens? For three months, you told your audience those planes were the "key" to solving Charlie Kirk’s murder. You linked them to TPUSA, the U.S. government, Brigitte Macron, and Israel. Then, the moment your spreadsheet was exposed as a hoax, you went silent. Where is the "updated timeline" you promised on December 16th? It's been over two months. If those planes were truly "the key to solving Charlie's murder," as you shouted for three months, there should be a direct, traceable chain of evidence connecting those planes to the crime scene. But there isn't. Instead, you constructed a chain of associations linking the planes to the two topics you were already obsessed with before Charlie was murdered: Israel and Brigitte Macron. You didn't follow the evidence to a conclusion. You constructed a narrative to reach your two favorite topics. And when that story collapsed, you went completely silent. That silence is the smoking gun. Your investigation isn't a legitimate pursuit of truth. You realized your spreadsheet was fabricated, but instead of admitting it, you just moved the goalposts. You have to. Because if you tell the truth—that your data fell apart—your credibility and your views collapse. You aren't willing to be honest with your audience because the truth doesn't support your paycheck. True integrity would require a public retraction that matches the volume of the original accusation. Instead, those planes were "the key to solving Charlie's murder" in October, November, and December, but they aren't worth a single tweet or update in January or February. You’re not investigating a murder; you’re squeezing Charlie's murder for views until the juice runs dry, and then you’re moving on to the next squeeze. You're dancing on Charlie's grave while you monetize his murder. It’s transparent, it’s dishonest, and it’s a disgrace to Charlie’s memory. There is something profoundly evil about claiming you want justice for Charlie while you systematically slander the people and the organization he spent his entire life building and loving. You say you’re defending his legacy, but you’ve treated his best friends and his own widow as co-conspirators. And you’ve done it without presenting a single shred of direct evidence. What you’ve actually done is a total inversion of the truth. You've treated a DNA-linked confession from Tyler Robinson as a "distraction," while treating an Egyptian plane that has zero connection to the murder as a "smoking gun." Think about how insane that sounds: You are looking away from a confession and a murder weapon, and looking toward the First Lady of France. Why? Why would any "investigative journalist" work this hard to ignore the person who actually pulled the trigger to focus on Brigitte Macron? A confession corroborated by physical evidence leads to a conviction in most court rooms. But for you, it was an inconvenience in the way of your ad-reading soap opera. So instead of following the evidence, you constructed a narrative that leads from Egyptian planes to Brigitte Macron. It's a complete reversal of reality. You've exonerated the actual suspect who was identified and turned in by his own parents, and in his place, you've accused Egyptian planes, Charlie's organization, and his grieving widow. You aren't seeking justice. You are performing a character assassination on the victims while providing cover for the killer. It is the ultimate betrayal of everything Charlie Kirk stood for, and to do it under the guise of "searching for the truth" is a total disgrace.

KanekoaTheGreat

272,171 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: Andrew Wilson tells Joe Rogan that Candace Owens won’t accept $300,000 to debate her theories about Charlie Kirk’s murder. WILSON: “You can’t get these people to debate their positions.” ROGAN: “Who won’t debate their positions?” WILSON: “Candace Owens. I offered her $300K to debate.” ROGAN: “What’s her position?” WILSON: “She thinks that Israel worked in conjunction with TPUSA and Erika Kirk to murder Charlie.” ROGAN: “Based on what?” WILSON: “That’s the million-dollar question... She’s never presented a single shred of evidence that Israel murdered Kirk or that Erika Kirk did. In fact, her position for the longest time was, ‘If Erika tells me to stop pushing conspiracies, I will.’ So Erika told her to stop... and the next day, Erika was trying to cover it up and was part of the conspiracy too.” WILSON: “Can you even imagine how that feels for her, especially now that she has tens of thousands of people accusing her of murdering, conspiring to murder, and covering up what happened to her own husband? That’s mind-boggling psychological torture on a level I’ve never seen.” ROGAN: “Hindsight is 20/20, but given the reaction, I think it would have been better for her to lay low for a little while. Going out with the sparklers was not a great idea because it just seemed insane. And maybe sometimes, when you’re grieving or trying to show that they’re not going to hold us back, people make choices that could be interpreted in a very bad way.” WILSON: “I asked her about the behavior, and she said, ‘Look, I was put in the worst spot I could ever think of. I was the background character. I was just there to support my husband. The only reason I got involved was because Charlie was so pro-marriage, and he wanted to demonstrate to the world that you can be pro-marriage and have kids.’” WILSON: “When he dies, this moves over to her control, and the first thing she says is that she wants to honor his last book. She wants to honor his legacy. ‘I don’t know how to take this position. At the same time, there are expectations for the organization my husband built, but I’m also in the middle of grief. I don’t know how you balance that position. Who has ever been in that position?’” ROGAN: “Right. This has exposed people’s character. The fact that the left was celebrating it... they have to feel bad about that... It’s just so cruel.” P.S. Charlie was the one who loved the sparklers. You could see them when RFK Jr. came out to endorse Trump and at all of Charlie’s major events over the past few years because Charlie loved them. Joe Rogan Andrew Wilson Candace Owens

KanekoaTheGreat

1,158,117 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens's own footage — the clip she used to defend Tyler Robinson — shows recoil she claimed wasn't there, perfectly timed to the shot that killed Charlie Kirk. Thank you for solving the case, Candace. In ten months, you never produced a shred of evidence that Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French Legionnaires, Israel, or TPUSA killed Charlie. This week, you produced footage of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk — blurry, because it's a camera recording a screen, but real. No wonder the defense fought to keep this out of the preliminary hearing. You can see him recoil as you hear the gunshot. You can see him run across the roof holding the gun wrapped in a towel. You can see him holding it as he jumps off the roof and walks across the grass. You've said footage of him assembling the rifle on that roof "does not exist." Fine — then release the full seven minutes he's up there, unedited, and let the public see for themselves. And hopefully the court eventually releases a high-resolution version. We know it's Tyler Robinson because there's more corroborating evidence here than in most murder convictions: He confessed multiple times. His parents and his boyfriend identified him in the footage, and he identified himself in one of his own confessions. Then he turned himself in. His car, his gun, his DNA, and his phone's Google Maps data all place him at the scene. He described exactly how the murder weapon was hidden — wrapped in a towel in the bushes — in texts to his boyfriend, before that detail was ever public. The list goes on. In ten months, the defense hasn't challenged any of it. If the confessions were fake, that's exactly how they'd have gotten this case thrown out. Thank you, too, for the Dairy Queen photo from that evening — showing his face in the same white-logo Hurley hat he's seen wearing on campus, a few minutes from where Charlie was shot. Ten months spent defending Charlie's accused killer, and slandering his wife, his friends, and his organization while making millions lying about his murder — and you finally produced real evidence. Unfortunately for you, it shows Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk. Charlie told us himself, seconds before he was murdered. A student asked him how many transgender Americans have been shooters in the last decade. Charlie's answer: "Too many." But thanks for the footage, Candace.

KanekoaTheGreat

1,170,279 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

WATCH: Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens Candace Owens laugh about the assassination of Charlie Kirk by Tyler Robinson! WATCH this video of both of them LAUGHING about the murder of Charlie Kirk. Candace and Bassem Youssef laughed hysterically while “joking” about how they think Erika Kirk Erika Kirk supposedly murdered her husband. And on Friday, during his interview with Russell Brand Russell Brand, Tucker laughed so hard at the thought of Charlie Kirk being assassinated, that he cried from laughing. Tucker then proceeded to post this video short on his official YouTube channel of himself hysterically laughing about Tyler Robinson murdering Charlie Kirk. Tucker titled the YouTube short “The Truth About Tyler Robinson”. Russell Brand was “joking” about Tyler Robinson murdering Charlie Kirk by insinuating that the shooter with a furry trans boyfriend was controlled by "the most powerful interests in the world." Gee, I wonder which "most powerful people" Russell and Tucker had in mind... The only people who laugh at the thought of ANYONE being brutally executed are sociopaths. And yet, here we have both Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens laughing about the murder of their supposed "friend." Tucker and Candace aren't just grifters, they're ghouls! Tucker is every bit as evil as Candace, and anyone who still supports them will be joining them in the fiery pits of hell. Cc: Turning Point USA Tyler Bowyer Andrew Kolvet JD Vance

Laura Loomer

1,534,372 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce