Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨BREAKING: Newly released ICE agent camera footage directly contradicts the claim that Renee Nicole Good tried to hit an agent with her vehicle. From the agent’s own angle, it’s clear Renee Nicole Good never posed a threat. In the synchronized footage, you can see her wife attempting to get...

327,536 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 VIDEO FRAME ANALYSIS. WHAT THE CAMERA ACTUALLY SHOWS 🚨 This still is from ICE Agent Johnathan David Ross's own cellphone footage. It matters bc perspective matters. First. Camera angle. The phone is already canted off the driver side. That means the agent was not directly in front of the vehicle. He’s offset. Side angle. Not a head-on threat. Second. Steering input. Look at the driver’s hands. That is a classic hand-over-hand steering motion. That’s how u turn a wheel to redirect a vehicle. Not how u accelerate straight into someone. The motion is consistent with turning away, not charging forward. Third. Vehicle movement. From the camera’s perspective the vehicle is angling away from the agent, not tracking directly toward him. The front wheels are turned. The hood line shifts laterally. Physics doesn’t lie even when press releases do. Fourth. Agent positioning. Federal use-of-force training is explicit. Do not cross in front of a moving vehicle. Officers are trained to angle off. create distance. disengage. Stepping into the path of a car collapses the decision tree into lethal force. That’s called manufacturing a threat. Fifth. Policy. ICE follows DHS Use of Force Policy. It mirrors DOJ standards. Firearms are not to be discharged at moving vehicles unless deadly force is unavoidable. Officers are expected to move out of the vehicle’s path when feasible. Standing in front of a car then firing violates core training doctrine. Bottom line. The camera angle shows he wasn’t squarely in front. The driver’s hands show she was turning. The vehicle trajectory shows lateral movement away. The agent crossed in front anyway. This isn’t hindsight quarterbacking. This is video. geometry. and the policy ICE agents are trained to follow. Spin fades. Frames don’t. What's your thoughts?

Mr. Gerald Wayne

28,881 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: New video footage shows ICE agents shooting a man trying to drive away, in Patterson, California… Proving DHS lied AGAIN. In the video, the driver is clearly reversing to get out of a boxed‑in spot. He backs up and accidentally hits an unmarked agent vehicle parked behind him… Not ramming anyone. Not charging an agent. Just trying to get away. That’s when the agents step in front of the car with guns drawn. The driver tries to turn and drive off, and this is when you can see at least one agent open fire. At no point does the driver attempt to strike an ICE agent. At no point is there any credible threat of him “trying to run an officer over.” The agents are not running away, not avoiding the car, not afraid for their lives… they’re standing in front of the car and firing into it. This directly contradicts DHS’s claim that “as officers approached the car, the wanted gang member weaponized his vehicle in an attempt to run an officer over” and that they fired only because they were in danger. And this is tragically familiar. This isn’t a split‑second judgment call or a disagreement over technique… This is a pattern: ICE agents opening fire on a person trying to flee. And every time footage comes out, the DHS narrative unravels. Every. Single. Time. Remember that next time someone tells you these shootings are “justified,” or that these agencies are being transparent. The video doesn’t lie… but they sure do.

Jesus Freakin Congress

184,645 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent threatened to kill a U.S. citizen for driving through a neighborhood, in Cold Spring, Minnesota. In the video, a woman is in her car when an agent walks towards her, with his hand on his gun, in the middle of the street. He tells her that if she comes near him with her car, it will be “the last thing that you do.” In other words… a federal agent just threatened to execute a U.S. citizen for driving down a public street. She immediately points out that she wasn’t even close to him and tells him to get out of the road. Instead, the agent escalates. He stands directly in front of her vehicle, hand still on his gun, and tells her she cannot reverse or leave the street. Except there’s just one problem… He never identifies a crime. He never states a lawful order. He simply blocks her car and starts issuing threats. That’s an illegal detention. Then, he contradicts himself… He told her she can’t back up… and seconds later screams at her to “back the f*ck up.” The agent then walks to the side of her car and begins shining a flashlight directly into her face, with his hand still on his gun. When she tells him to get the light out of her face and back off, he moves directly in front of her car again and repeats the threat: “Do not hit me. This is your first and last warning.” Again… she hasn’t moved. Her car is still in reverse, and she repeatedly tells him to take his hand off his gun. She even says: “I’m not going to hit you!” And yet, the agent keeps escalating, screaming the same accusation over and over… as if he’s trying to manufacture a justification to shoot her. This is the exact same tactic we’ve already seen in multiple shootings involving ICE/Border Patrol… where federal agents step in front of vehicles and then claim they feared for their lives when the driver tries to leave, like they told them to do. Blocking a vehicle, threatening deadly force, illegally detaining a citizen, and creating a scenario where a shooting can be justified after the fact… Is not only dangerous, it’s illegal. Because when armed federal agents start threatening to kill people for driving down their own street, more people are eventually going to end up dead… And they will call it “self-defense.” And removing Kristi Noem isn’t going to change that.

Jesus Freakin Congress

415,263 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨ICE agents are now assaulting U.S. citizens for filming in a public parking lot, in Lawrence, Kansas. In the video, a woman is walking through a parking lot, well away from any arrest happening. An ICE vehicle pulls up beside her. Another agent runs toward her yelling, “Get back,” even though she is not interfering with anything. She calmly asks, “How far back?” He yells, “That far!” She complies. She turns and walks in the opposite direction to get to her own car. The agent continues yelling for her to get back. She explains she’s trying to get back to her vehicle. He starts to walk away… until he notices she is filming. That’s when he turns around, rushes back toward her with more aggression, and screams, “Get back now!” while he shoves her. And just to clarify… She is in a public space. She is not obstructing. She is complying. She is exercising her First Amendment right to record federal agents in public. She is attempting to access her own property.. her vehicle. An officer cannot escalate force simply because someone pulls out a phone. They cannot create arbitrary boundaries that shift the second a camera appears. They cannot use physical force against someone who is actively moving away. A federal agent shoving a compliant citizen, after realizing she’s recording, is retaliation for protected speech… and that’s illegal. But, the question we need to keep asking is… Why do ICE agents get so angry when they are being filmed?

Jesus Freakin Congress

179,243 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад