Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨:. Michael Proctor lost his last-minute request to delay his deposition in the Karen Read and John O'Keefe civil case. As a result, Proctor is required to attend a deposition with Alan Jackson on June 25th or July 14th. Karen Read and Alan Jackson have won, again. As...

34,503 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨: Michael Proctor will be forced to appear for his deposition with Alan Jackson and Karen Read, however Judge Gildea will delay his final ruling until 4pm ET today in order to supplement Proctor's "insufficient" arguments to the court regarding a protective order to delay that deposition. Another hearing will happen today at 4:15PM et TODAY (Monday, June 8th, 2026, via Zoom). Proctor's deposition, for now, is stayed for 24 hours. "For this case to proceed efficiently, and for our system of justice to work, certain basic things need to happen," Judge Gildea began during his ruling. "A subpoena needs to mean something, a lawyer's agreement needs to have some meaning, lawyers need to communicate with their clients, clients need to keep their attorneys informed, and when given an opportunity to provide support for a party's request, that party needs to avail themselves of the opportunity," Judge continued (scolding Proctor's counsel for failing to provide a sufficient record to justify a delay in Proctor's deposition, despite an order by the court on Friday for such information to be filed). Based on the record before me, there is insufficient information to support a delay in the deposition going forward, however, given the claims made in the filings over the weekend, I will delay making a final decision on the motion until 4PM today, to give Mr. Proctor's counsel to supplement the record before me," Judge Gildea concluded. The Michael Proctor and Sean Goode "Proctorgate" files have caused serious damage, and Karen Read stands tall. Read more about those shocking, and abhorrent, messages here (also discussed by Judge Gildea during today's hearing) wherein Proctor (a former State Trooper who investigated Karen Read for the death of John O'Keefe) and former Canton cop Sean Goode talked about everything from how Anne Frank was a "liar" to how Proctor felt Goode should "let them die" after Proctor noticed a car accident victim was, in Proctor's words, a "ni**er". Proctor also discussed "planting cocaine" on someone and, shockingly, said "America sucks" because the country stopped the Third Reich during World War II (while, at the same time, saying "Jews in Sharon" should be "put in a concentration camp") at this link: To this day, the death of John O'Keefe remains unsolved. Proctor is just one of multiple witnesses involving in the twice-failed prosecution of Karen for John's death who Read's lawyers have told Judge Gildea are attempting to avoid or delay depositions (including Colin Albert, Jennifer McCabe, Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert). Last week, on Wednesday, I reported: In a shocking hearing before Judge Mark Gildea on Wednesday, Karen Read's lawyers announced that they have been forced to file a motion to compel a deposition of Colin Albert. Further, Karen's lawyers will be filing motions to compel depositions of Jennifer McCabe, Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert, as those parties are seeking to delay their depositions until late July, or early August, of 2026. "Colin Albert refused to appear or produce documents...his attorney said he is unavailable and then, suddenly, said Colin would only be available for seven more days and, then, [Colin] would be gone for the entire discovery period," Karen's Lawyer, Aaron Rosenberg, told Judge Gildea during Wednesday's hearing. In that regard, here is the full recording of today's John O'Keefe and Karen Read hearing in Plymouth Superior Court. This case is one of three ongoing civil lawsuits (one in federal court and two in Plymouth District Court in front of Judge Gildea) that stem from the, yet-unsolved, murder of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. To this day, it is unclear if anyone has found the Mystery Man who is suspected of being at the center of potential upcoming investigations by state and federal authorities as to John's death. Read more about that Mystery Man here - Judge Gildea began Wednesday's hearing by asking counsel for all parties how many depositions have been conducted in the case. "I am hoping at least four have been taken," said Judge Gildea. The O'Keefe lawyer told Judge Gildea that only three depositions have taken place. Judge then asked the O'Keefe lawyer what depositions need to still take place for the plaintiffs. "There are 12," the O'Keefe lawyer responded, including Paul Markowski. The O'Keefe lawyers also need to change Karen's deposition until June 24th. The O'Keefe lawyers changed Karen's deposition from July to June 19th, but multiple lawyer's will not be working on that day as that day is a federal holiday. Judge was not pleased that so few depositions have taken place, but Judge understood that June 19th is a federal holiday and, in turn, Karen's deposition will be held on June 24th, 2026. Karen's lawyers had proposed four other dates and Mr. Diller (the O'Keefe lawyer) picked a federal holiday, instead. "It is beyond belief to me the number of experienced lawyers involved in this case, the length the case has been pending...for however long it has been pending for all parties...that there are so few depositions that have taken place...I don't need to hear all the details, and the nitpicking, what I need to hear is, going forward, how you all are going to get the discovery done," Judge Gildea said to all lawyers. Things, at that point, got quite intense, as Karen's lawyers then noted to Judge Gildea that they have six depositions currently scheduled for the following six witnesses; Brian and Nicole Albert, Matthew McCabe, Allie McCabe, Jennifer McCabe and Brian Higgins. However, the law firm for all of those people got back to Karen's lawyers last night, on June 2nd, 2026, at 9:45PM and said NONE of those witnesses could appear on the dates scheduled for their depositions and, for some reason, none of those witnesses are able to appear for depositions until late July of 2026 at the earliest. Stunningly, no reason was given for why those witnesses refused to appear for their depositions on the dates originally proposed by Karen's lawyers, Attorney Rosenberg told Judge Gildea. Those notices of depositions went out on May 5th, 2026, said Karen's lawyers, when Judge Gildea asked about that date (indicating Judge Gildea, already displeased with discovery and deposition delays in the years-old case, was not pleased to hear about witnesses, on their own accord, attempting to delay depositions by two more months). Karen's lawyers, picking up on Judge Gildea's frustration, then noted that they intend to file motions to compel those witnesses to appear for depositions as a result of the proposed delays. Also, during the hearing, it was announced that former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will be deposed by Karen Read's lawyers on Monday, June 8th, 2026, per a statement from Karen's lawyers in court on Wednesday. The O'Keefe lawyer, for their part, noted they intend to depose Aidan Kearney, Karen Read, Kaitlin Boudreau Read (Nathan Read's wife), Janet Read, Nathan Read, William Read, multiple witnesses from the bars (C.F. McCarthy's and The Waterfall), and an outstanding deposition that Karen's team needed to move last week. Judge Gildea then asked what, if anything, he could do to help the parties (other than moving quickly on motions before the court when submitted). Both parties said they will involve the court, in motion practice, as needed going forward. Judge then wanted to know what motions have been sent out under Rule 9(a). It was at that point that Karen's lawyers announced that she will be filing a motion to compel production of documents and the deposition of Colin Albert. "Colin Albert refused to appear or produce documents...his attorney said he is unavailable and then, suddenly, said Colin would only be available for seven more days and then [Colin] would be gone for the entire discovery period," Karen's Lawyer, Aaron Rosenberg, told Judge Mark Gildea during the hearing. Earlier, Karen also announced that she intends to file similar motions for Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert, as those witnesses are attempting to avoid their depositions until late July or early August of 2026. The O'Keefe lawyer, for their part, told Judge Gildea they intend to serve a motion to compel regarding Aidan Kearney as a keeper of record (and, for some reason, Diller wants documents from Aidan's ongoing case in Norfolk Superior Court). "File a motion and we'll put it on for an expedited hearing," Judge Gildea said regarding that issue, and any other motions to compel the parties may want to file (including the motion regarding Colin Albert that has already been served, and should be in the docket in the next few weeks). When a motion is served under Rule 9(a), it is first given to the opposing party who then responds. Then, the moving party (the "movant") is able to file a sur-reply. Only at that point does the entire motion to compel get compiled as a so-called "Rule 9 (a) package" and, in turn, appear on the docket (with all filings related to a given motion showing up at the same time). It is unclear when the motions to compel the depositions of Brian Higgins, Jen McCabe, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert will be served and, eventually, docketed with the court. Penalties for third-parties who avoid discovery, or document production requests, can include court sanctions, compelled deposition dates, and adverse evidentiary rulings if a motion to compel is granted, yet further delays then occur. Judge Gildea told all of the lawyers present that he expects to dive deep into the issue of who was issued deposition notices in this case, who avoided those depositions, who delayed depositions and, in turn, what remedies the court will impose. "We served it Monday," the O'Keefe lawyer then said, as the hearing ended (indicating a number of motions to compel discovery, or depositions, may be heard over the coming weeks under the sweltering heat of Judge Gildea's virtual courtroom stare). More as I know it.

Grant Smith Ellis

24,670 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

FULL HEARING: Karen Read and Colin Albert Motion To Compel Hearing (6/22/2026). Hearing notes: Judge Gildea was highly suspect of Colin Albert's lawyer after that lawyer suggested he "had done research" and "contacted the army 4 times" to determine if Colin Albert could be forced to sit for a deposition in a civil case while in basic training. "Did your research include what happens if the subpoena had already been served [before enlistment]?" Judge Gildea shot back. Later, Judge Gildea also scolded Albert's counsel for suggesting Colin's original deposition had been "cancelled": "You might not want to use the words 'the other side cancelled the deposition.' You should couch it in the terms that it is disputed." Karen's lawyers also announced that other witnesses -- including Brian Albert, Nicole Albert, Jennifer McCabe and Matt McCabe-- are attempting to avoid their depositions and, in turn, further motions to compel will be incoming. Shockingly Brian Tully, a state police officer in charge of the investigation of Karen for John's death, is also attempting to avoid being deposed by Karen's lawyers. Read's lawyers told Judge Gildea that Tully had agreed to be deposed on July 8th, 2026 and then, suddenly, last week, submitted a motion to the court seeking to quash (or cancel) the deposition without conferring with Karen's counsel before the motion was filed. Karen's lawyers told Judge Gildea that they wrote an opposition to Tully's motion to quash, and that those documents should hit the docket soon (Tully's counsel has to file them as a single Rule 9(A) package). Colin's lawyers said they disagree with the court about the validity of the subpoena served by Karen on Colin Albert. Then, Colin's lawyers said the parties would need to obtain the permission of Albert's commanding officer at basic training in order to make the deposition happen. "I've never done that before so I don't know how to make that happen," said Colin's befuddled lawyer. "I've called [the army] four times," Colin's lawyer said. "The reality is, neither we nor Mr. Albert have any authority to present him for a deposition during basic training. This is a 10 week program and, after that, we understand he will be available for leave," Colin's lawyer continued. "Given the burden this would impose..." Colin's lawyer tried to say, before being cut off by Judge Gildea, who noted; "Excuse me, the burden is self-imposed because there was a subpoena and, as I've said a number of times, a subpoena needs to mean something. And, also, there was an agreement between attorneys and an attorney's word needs to mean something." Colin's lawyers then tried to argue that Judge Gildea was wrong and the subpoena for Colin "is not valid." Judge Gildea did not take kindly to that argument, nor did Karen's lawyer Aaron Rosenberg. Rosenberg was furious that Colin's lawyer has refused to produce any documents and, also, that Colin's lawyer told the court a rescheduled deposition was somehow "cancelled." Rosenberg also had serious questions about whether Colin Albert disclosed his ongoing civil cases, and subpoenas, to the army before enlistment. "I would have a couple questions [about that process]: first, was Mr. Albert asked to identify this proceeding, and the subpoena that he had received, when he enlisted in the military? If he was, does that impact his ability to come back to Massachusetts to appear pursuant to the subpoena that was issued in this case?" Rosenberg began. "At the end of the day, everyone respects a person's decision to serve this country, but the timing of this [enlistment] is extremely relevant. We served the subpoena, we had the back and forth where we said we would reschedule, we waited three weeks for a response on the documents, we then got an email saying, 'Mr. Albert is available for the next 13 days and then he's gone.' That's not appropriate, and that's not in compliance with the subpoena that was issued by counsel through this court," Rosenberg continued. "And if there's something we can do to help make the taking of this deposition more possible, we're happy to do that, but there's been no proposal to do this. There is simply a response that says, '[Colin Albert] can't do [what you asked.]'" Karen's lawyer then noted that Colin's last-second request to extend a firm discovery deadline in the case is outrageous in light of Judge Gildea's firm enforcement of the end of the existing August, 2026, discovery period. Colin's lawyer than told Judge Gildea that, if the court orders Colin to appear for a deposition, Colin's lawyers will comply. During the hearing, Judge Gildea and Karen's lawyer Aaron Rosenberg also discussed the scope of discovery related to Colin Albert and Colin Albert's movements on the early morning of John O'Keefe's death (1/29/22). Colin's lawyer was allowed to participate in the hearing without being pro hac'd into the case (Colin's lawyer is from another state for some reason). Colin's lawyer objected to producing communications between Colin Albert and his parents that went beyond matters relating to the death of John O'Keefe, but Rosenberg pointed out to Judge Gildea that the case is about far more than John's death, as there are also allegations of conspiracy related to Karen's public narrative about her innocence. Karen's lawyer proposed to Judge Gildea that the parties could work together on a list of search terms related to those documents requests. Colin's lawyer than objected to providing information in the case about Colin's messages about Karen on his phone. Colin's lawyer suggested these documents should not be turned over because a journalist, Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney, is facing charges related to his coverage of the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case. Next hearing on motions to compel will be July 6th, 2026, at 2PM ET. Our next status hearing in this matter is on June 26th, 2026, at 9:45AM ET. Thank you to Canton Community TV (Canton Community TV) for the pool footage!

Grant Smith Ellis

29,481 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Here is Tuesday's full Karen Read/Aidan Kearney hearing, related to the lawsuit filed by H.A.M., via Canton Community TV (who are wonderful) and Boston 25. To begin, Mark Bederow was approved as pro hac counsel for Aidan Kearney. The Judge, Mark Gildea, then went over the rules for Rule 16 hearings. Judge Gildea moved the case to a fast-track, which would get the case done in two years. TurtleBoy's lawyer noted that both Karen and Aidan intend to file anti-SLAPP motions to dismiss. Aidan's anti-SLAPP will be filed by the end of this week. However, if the plaintiffs amend their pleadings, that timeline could be extended. The anti-SLAPP motion will be 30 pages. The H.A.M. defendants want an entire 30 days to reply to the anti-SLAPP motion, to which Judge said "Why?" The H.A.M. lawyer then asked Judge Gildea, again, for 30 extra days to reply to the anti-SLAPP because the H.A.M. defendants, and the Norfolk D.A., have been served discovery requests by Karen's lawyers. The H.A.M. lawyer then tried to get those documents from the Norfolk D.A. but, because he did not have a protective order, he was unable to get the material. However, the H.A.M. lawyer was caught off guard when Karen and Aidan's lawyers noted to the Judge that an anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss tolls all discovery deadlines. Karen's team has until June 12, 2026 to file that motion. Karen's lawyers, as to the H.A.M. defendants getting their protective order such as to be able to access the documents from the Norfolk D.A. (including potentially devastating evidence from Michael Proctor's personal cellphone about "kill a n-word in Canton day"). We will be back on Thursday June 4, 2026, for a hearing on that protective order issue at 10AM ET (at Plymouth Superior Court). This hearing however, may be cancelled if the parties can agree on a protective order before that date. We will then be back on July 14, 2026, at 2PM ET for a hearing on Aidan and Karen's incoming anti-SLAPP motions to dismiss. The H.A.M. lawyer asked that he be given until July 7th, 2026, to respond to Karen and Aidan's motion, to which the court agreed. Aidan and Karen will be given until July 10, 2026, for a sur-reply. This means discovery will be stayed in the case until, at least, early August of 2026, if not longer. That hearing will also be at at Plymouth Superior Court. This is because, once Karen and Aidan file their anti-SLAPP motions to dismiss, all discovery in the case will stop for the foreseeable future due to procedural, and statutory rules, related to such motions. The H.A.M. lawyer noted that, in light of the anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss, they may amend their complaint. The H.A.M. lawyer noted that, as a result, their response to the coming motions to dismiss under the anti-SLAPP statute will also serve to form the basis for an expansion of their original complaint (permitted until Rule 16). The H.A.M. lawyer obtaining messages from Aidan Kearney's phone, apparently via some kind of third-party network that links back to the Norfolk D.A. and private intelligence firms, was also brought up as, shockingly, a basis for the H.A.M. lawyers attempting to piece Karen's lawyer-client privilege during discovery (thus, potentially, exposing a multi-year operation, dating back to the spring of 2023, to plant private intelligence operatives in Karen and Aidan's orbit for this very purpose). The H.A.M. lawyer also noted they intend to call expert witnesses about, other things, "internet usage." It is unclear if the entire internet, including the "secret" Discord server used by some witnesses during the Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial, will be brought into the record (that was a joke). As of today, John O'Keefe's killer has not been caught. A "Mystery Man", who appeared in edited Canton Police Department Sallyport footage at 5:38PM ET on 1/29/22 (the day of John's death), may be the focus of an upcoming joint state-federal prosecution (should Adam Detich win the Norfolk D.A. primary in September of 2026), although that is only speculation on the part of this reporter. Analysis: When discovery resumes, sometimes in late 2026 or early 2027, this case could indeed become explosive. I have never seen a situation where, three years before litigation, potential private intelligence operatives were used to preemptively establish grounds to pierce Karen's privilege during a civil trial. I will provide more information as I know it.

Grant Smith Ellis

16,316 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

NEW: The Proctorgate files continue to expand to SnapChat, and Michael Proctor's lawyer accused Karen Read's legal team of engaging in "defamation" by revealing Proctor and Sean Goode's horrifying text messages in a court filing last week, during a hearing before Judge Doolin Thursday on the Myles King docket in Norfolk Superior Court. Proctor's lawyer, during the hearing, argued that Proctor's Snapchat and text messages should not be made public. That resulted in this reporter saying, in real time; Wait, Michael Proctor had a Snapchat!?!?! Proctor's lawyer then referenced Karen's case filed last week in Bristol county (Proctorgate). Proctor's lawyer says he realizes the cat is out of the bad but implores Judge that we are talking about "Michael Proctor's privacy, who has spent years helping victims. He has never been indicted. He has never been arrested. He has never had his bail revoked. I would suggest Proctor has a legitimate privacy interest in these Snapchat messages." Proctor's lawyer wants the Norfolk D.A. to orally tell the defendants about Proctor's Snapchat messages. Proctor's lawyer then told Judge Doolin that Karen's lawsuit involving the Proctorgate files was intended to defame and embarrass Michael Proctor and, in turn, Proctor's lawyer asks Judge Doolin to keep Proctor's Snapchat messages public. Those were Proctor's own words (I said out loud). Rosemary Scapichhhio, the lawyer for Myles King, then said that Proctor has no standing in this case. Proctor is just an agent of the Commonwealth, says Scapichhhio, and it makes no sense to keep this material sealed when the Proctorgate messages are already starting to come out into the public. "I can't, for the life of me, understand how Proctor even has standing to come before the court," Scapichhhio said. Judge Doolin then said he will have a ruling "for ya' shortly." King, for his part, in currently in federal prison after he was charged by the DOJ last month for drug trafficking (a move that many suspect was designed to remove Proctor from King's cases). Read more about Proctorgate here -

Grant Smith Ellis

71,268 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: Prosecutors in the case of Massachusetts man Bryan Walshe have confirmed on the record in open court that the federal probe into the death of John O'Keefe is over! The Judge in the case, herself, then also confirmed that the "investigation is not [still] going on" after reading a letter provided to the court by those prosecutors (who were, themselves, contacted directly by the US Attorney and told the federal O'Keefe investigation is over). It was all true. The Karen Read trial has come to it's stunning conclusion. For context: One of the Troopers involved in investigating Walshe (Michael Proctor) was brought up in the Walshe trial over recent months by the defense, and, in turn, that led to the moment in court today. The Judge asked prosecutors to explain if there was any changes related to a previous Touhy request sent to the federal government and, in turn, the prosecutor said there was an update from the US Attorney directly to the prosecutor's office (that was given to defense counsel yesterday). That update, in turn, confirms the end of the federal probe of John O'Keefe's death (as the prosecutor made direct reference to U.S. Attorney Massachusetts, US Attorney Foley, and Foley's interview with Dan Rea on Tuesday of this week, wherein US Attorney Foley said it would not be a violation of DOJ policy for the US Attorney to tell Law Enforcement partners about the status of, or updates related to, an investigation). "[US Attorney Foley] said it is not uncommon for law enforcement partners to be notified of the status of an investigation. My office was notified by the US Attorney's Office and I provided that to defense counsel," said the prosecutor on Walshe's case. An ongoing federal protective order related to the O'Keefe materials, that will remain active even though the investigation is over, may have some impact in the Walshe case (and the Judge discussed that as well). See my video analysis (and the full clip from court today) below. The news, first broken by BillMcEntyre (and then confirmed by Ted Daniel and Kristina Rex) is now part of the history books.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,974 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

JUST IN: After a short hearing in Norfolk Superior Court, it was revealed that Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney is alleging massive interference with his criminal cases by an online troll named Kate MafiaMasshole Peter. Listen to the hearing, in full below. Peter and Kearney used to work together, until 2019, until a bitter falling out (either over money, or over Peter going out on her own to start a new show, depending on who you believe) led to a years-long feud that bubbled in a proxy-sideshow-war related to the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case (and the eventual criminal charges against Kearney). Peter, during the fall of 2023, worked for a Private Investigations firmed tied to a man named Marty Kraft that may be central to Kearney's allegation of interference. A hearing on those matters, and a request to disqualify Special Prosecutor Ken Mello, will be held over the coming months. Also on Monday, the state revealed that 6,000 pages of discovery have been provided to Kearney's team. Protective orders related to the material will remain in force for at least two weeks, although Kearney is asking to lift some of those orders related to Michael Proctor, Jen McCabe and Kate Peter. A protective order related to a leaked copy of Lindsey Gaetani's phone. Brian Tully turned over a full copy of that phone to Kearney's lawyers unredacted, including pictures of Lindsey giving birth, yet for some reason (while the phone was in the possession of the State Police) messages from Tully to Lindsey, and from Kate Peter to Lindsey, were removed from the extraction of Lindsey's phone before that extraction was handed over to Kearney. Why Tully removed those messages, yet turned over naked pictures of Lindsey giving birth to Kearney (on 4/24/24, just days before the first Read trial began), is unclear. During Monday's hearing, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts also confirmed that Kate MafiaMasshole Peter has a direct relationship with State Police Lieutenant Brian Tully (therein strongly implying both Peter, and Tully, were involved in the leak of Lindsey's phone - potentially to distract TurtleBoy's fans from other witnesses in the Read case who have more money than Lindsey, and who have more influence over Tully than Lindsey). Read that protective order here - Peter was, of course, the same person who spread a rumor about Chris and Colin Albert (that went around for years) selling drugs. See video proof here - Whether Chris and Colin Albert, along with Lindsey, were unwittingly used in some kind of scheme to deflect public attention away from other witnesses in the Read case remains unclear. Evidence of that contact was revealed in Norfolk Superior Court today by Prosecutor Robert Cosgrove. Then, lawyers for Kearney alleged in court that Peter leaked the name of a woman who submitted a court document with statements suggesting Peter interfered in the investigation of Kearney. A hearing on the matter may be held in the coming months, although Kearney lawyers alleged Monday that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has failed to turn over communications from Kate MafiaMasshole Peter to agents of the State Police, and others involved with the Norfolk DA. Some communications from Peter to Prosecutor Ken Mello have been turned over, but new Rule 14 requirements mean Kearney gets more access than last year. Kearney's lawyers also alleged that the person who taped papers to the door of a woman who alleged Kate MafiaMasshole Peter interfered in the investigation of Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney is apparently under investigation for witness interference. It is unclear who put those papers on the woman's door. Kearney also agreed to provide a passcode to his phones that are subject to a TAINT team review. Two other phones belonging to Kearney have already been searched. The next hearing in Kearney's case will be at 2PM ET on Wednesday August 13, 2025.

Grant Smith Ellis

33,173 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten