Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Breaking Points’ Krystal Ball responds to overtures from Nick Fuentes urging the progressive left to ally with him against establishment elites. “I feel like my bar for allyship is very low. My bar is you have to view all human beings as fundamentally equal and deserving of rights. That’s...

106,218 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Have you ever wondered why Mahatma Gandhi placed such emphasis on khadi? Why did he frame the entire freedom struggle around the concept of khadi? And why did he only wear khadi? Because khadi is not just a cloth. Khadi is the expression of the people of India. It is the imagination, it is the sentiment, it is the productive force of the people of India. It is the expression of the people of India. Whichever state you go to, you will find different fabrics, and you will find that all these fabrics represent the people. When the people of Assam give you gamcha, they are not just giving you a piece of cloth; they are giving you a piece of their history, their tradition, their imagination. It's the same with people from other states. These fabrics are beautiful, but when you see these fabrics closely, you will find that each one of them has thousands of little threads embracing each other. All threads are equal. The threads cannot protect you or keep you warm, but when they come together as a fabric, they can keep you warm, protect you, and they can express what you have in your heart. In the same way, our nation is also a fabric. A fabric made up of 1.4 billion people, and the fabric is woven together by votes. The idea that every thread, every person in the union of India is equal - that disturbs my friends in RSS. They are happy to see the fabric, but they cannot stand the idea that every single person in our fabric, in our country, is equal. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in LokSabha

Congress

13,788 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 LISTEN TO CHARLIE KIRK: "I cannot see a single Western country that has become more Islamic and has become a better place to live that is happier or freer." "I think it's SUICIDAL to import MILLIONS of them." "Is macro Islam compatible with Western values, macro? Of course, it's NOT. There are 3 major reasons why." "Islam does not believe in freedom of speech, Islam does not believe in freedom of religion, and Islam does not believe in separation of mosque and state." "Those three things are antithetical to the West. In a Muslim-majority country, most Muslim-majority countries, you cannot criticize the prophet Muhammad. In most Muslim-majority countries, you do not have the same robust freedom of religion protections." "And finally, whereas we in the West are very careful to try to intermix religion and state, they are commanded to actually go into the state and try to change the state to be more Islamic around the core pillars of Islam." "The question that we need to reckon with the West is, is Muhammadism compatible with the teachings of Blackstone? Is it compatible with the legacy of Wilberforce and the great thinkers that have come from this country?" "And I will say, no, there's a reason why when you go to these Islamic countries that you're not going to see the equal protection of rights, that you do not believe in universal human equality, that you do not believe the same things that we believe in the West."

Eric Daugherty

348,360 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Americans are becoming wide awake “Dearborn, Michigan is the perfect case study about why Islam is not compatible with American society or civilization at large. Did Dearborn become a beacon of light and hope? Is it full of charity and people looking out for one another in peace and coexistence and, oh my gosh, the amount of doctors and lawyers? No. Dearborn, Michigan is absolutely disgusting. It is filled with crime, it is filled with poverty, and it is filled with American citizens being told that if they do not want to bow down to the Islamization of America, then they need to get the hell out, even being told that by their own politicians. They feel like Islam can rule over everything there, right? They loudly play their call to prayer and if you have a problem with it, despite the fact that it legally breaks city ordinance with how loud it is, then you're told to leave and that you need to be quiet and that you just need to submit to their way of living. If you think that this is a coincidence, if you think that they have any intention of stopping there, then you are deluding yourself. These people are extremely violent. They don't want open discourse. They don't want open dialogue about religion. They do not see you as an equal, and girls who do not wear hijabs there or who do not dress in their definition of modesty are oftentimes harassed for it. They even went so far as to try to stop people from being able to walk their dogs because they see dogs as unclean animals. This is absolutely disgusting and I hope the American people start to wake up and realize what's actually going on over there.”

Wall Street Apes

75,419 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

“What Do You Mean by Jewish State?” Abdul El-Sayed Pushes Back Katie Halper: So, speaking of AIPAC and people who are very supportive of Israel, there was an interesting interaction between you and Olivia Reingold of The Free Press. Olivia Reingold: Abdul El-Sayed, who is Muslim, walks a fine line on the Jewish state. He told the crowd, “All of us love and revere Jewish folk, our Jewish neighbors, the faith of Judaism.” Later that night, I asked him whether he believes in Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state. Dr. Abdul El-Sayed: I'd love to take the question, actually. What do you mean by Jewish state? If you can't define the question, I'm not going to answer your question. Katie Halper: So, it's fascinating to me that “What does a Jewish state mean?” can be a gotcha question. Do you think most people would have a different opinion if they understood what the current Jewish state of Israel means? Dr. Abdul El-Sayed: I think most people have in their heart of hearts a commitment to foundational equity—that everybody deserves equal rights to peace, dignity, and self-determination. The reason I asked that question is because it's very difficult to square that question with equal rights for Palestinian people. Whether you're defining a Jewish state based on an actual state religion, which means that some people don't belong as much because they may not belong to the same faith. And then if you're doing it by identity, the question becomes, well, is it the identity of the leadership or is it the majority of the country? All of these become really, really difficult to square with any semblance of equal rights. If your interpretation of the identity of a state would then allow that state to discriminate against people for how they pray or because of their ethnicity, I don't think most of us would be okay with that. And I'll say that about any country. I don't believe in ethno-states, I just don't. I believe in the equal human dignity of all people. I'm grateful that I live in the United States of America where there is no state religion, no state language, and no state identity. And I don't believe that people should be allowed to discriminate against one another or that we should have whole power structures based on who people are.

Jeff

23,536 просмотров • 26 дней назад

VeryDarkMan has finally spoken on the ongoing P-Square disput£ concerning the sharing of royalties and assets earned from their music career. According to VDM, Peter Okoye, also known as Mr. P, reached out to him after an alleged alt£rc@ti0n. Peter claimed that Jude and Paul a$s@ult£d him in the house during an argument over their finances. Peter alleged that Jude and Paul have b£tr@y£d him for years. He stated that they have been s£lfishly appropriating all the money earned from music, while he received nothing, including properties. He also said they have cons!st£ntly mistr£at£d him and that he can no longer tol£rate it. He further claimed that the claim that he was given 30% is false, and that he was never given any money or properties VDM explained that he does not like to rely on one side of a story. Upon hearing Peter’s account, he immediately contacted Jude and Paul for their response. He said: Honestly, I can't pass judgment yet Jude, you are the eldest and you are not acting like it. The way you are tr£at!ng Peter shows that you know exactly what you are doing. I have now heard from all three of you. In my honest opinion, I'm not gonna judge yet but just speaking From my thoughts Jude and Paul need to do better and remember that Peter is your brother. Jude Paul are the problem.I have engaged my lawyer for further investigation. I'm not trying to support Peter. But Paul and Jude, I am giving you six hours to provide proof that you gave Peter his 30%. If you fail to do so, you should be held acc0untabl£, because you have wronged your brother grav£ly. It is time to face the cons£qu£nc£s. This is no longer a private matter. It is now a public issue. And Jude, if you come for me, you will r£gr£t it. I am waiting for your proof I have been watching all of these issues play out online, and I chose to remain silent. But now, it is time to speak up. Jude, let me be honest with you. You were not part of P-Square when they were struggling to build their career and make their money. Your role was to support them and help manage their finances as their elder brother. This money represents their hard work. It's not right for you to take 40%. Just because you're the elder brother should not give you the right to large share of what belongs to your younger brothers I think 10% should go for you after further investigation.

dangerous baby

250,174 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A Constitutional Attorney SPEAKS OUT Against What The United States Government Has Become, TYRANNICAL. Calls Out Big Pharma MUST LISTEN: “We Have The Right To Resist — When in the world do we start testing things on children?” “We The People is how the Constitution starts. A magistrate is a person that operates under authority and they are lesser magistrates. The founding fathers of this country understood that there is going to come a point in time where the federal government will need to be checked. If not, they will become tyrants. ‌ And that is what's happening now. So, the Declaration of Independence says that everyone, by virtue of being a human being, has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The federal government too, the federal government purpose is to protect the rights of those citizens, the rights of us to our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. The third point of that document is if they fail to protect its citizens and enforce those rights, the citizens have a right to revolt. Do you understand? We have a right to resist and we have an obligation and a duty to do so. ‌ Do you understand? ‌ Yeah! ‌ THEY ARE COMING FOR OUR CHILDREN, We cannot sit down! Nope. ‌ Everybody knows even the bad ones know that if you want to affect a country, you go for its children. ‌ When in the world do we start using children as bulletproof vests for us? ‌ When in the world do we start testing things on children? Legal shield. ‌ You have started a war! ‌ Each one reach one and teach one. Do you understand? As a magistrate in this country, the United States government, our government, our local leaders have to answer to us. The ninth amendment says that any rights that are not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved for the people. I don't want to hear that mandates are not enumerated in the Constitution because for the stuff that is not enumerated means to equal protection is the right to protect my body. When you want to, when you want to push something into my body against my consent, without my consent, it is rape. And this is medical rape. No!”

Wall Street Apes

228,883 просмотров • 3 лет назад