Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

BREAKING; RUSSIA Unveils World's First Intercontinental Fighter: Su-34 Could Strike Washington from Moscow Skies?!! Russia has fielded the "world’s first intercontinental range fighter" with the Su-34, capable of flying from Moscow to Washington, Su-34 as the longest-ranged tactical combat aircraft in service, emphasizing its ferry range potential. No aerial...

Globalsurv's profile picture

Global Surveillance

55,360 subscribers

82,323 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🔴🇮🇱 Israel Pushes F-35 Limits: Stealth Jet Gets Range Boost Upgrade Israel has signed a $34 million deal with Elbit subsidiary Cyclone to equip its F-35 “Adir” stealth fighters with external fuel tanks, aiming to significantly extend mission range and reduce reliance on aerial refueling. The upgrade could give the jets greater operational flexibility for long-distance strike missions, but comes with a key trade off, external tanks may reduce the aircraft’s stealth profile, a defining feature of the F-35 design. No other F-35 operator has implemented this modification, making Israel’s move a unique experiment in balancing stealth vs reach. Source: The Jerusalem Post
0:17

🔴🇮🇱 Israel Pushes F-35 Limits: Stealth Jet Gets Range Boost Upgrade Israel has signed a $34 million deal with Elbit subsidiary Cyclone to equip its F-35 “Adir” stealth fighters with external fuel tanks, aiming to significantly extend mission range and reduce reliance on aerial refueling. The upgrade could give the jets greater operational flexibility for long-distance strike missions, but comes with a key trade off, external tanks may reduce the aircraft’s stealth profile, a defining feature of the F-35 design. No other F-35 operator has implemented this modification, making Israel’s move a unique experiment in balancing stealth vs reach. Source: The Jerusalem Post

Defence Index

19,158 views • 2 months ago

Su-34M vs F-16 Block 70/72 Radar - Su-34M: Modernized PESA radar (type B004/Novella or variants), target detection up to 250-300 km - F-16 Block 70/72: AESA AN/APG-83 (scaled from F-22/F-35), typical detection ~250-350 km for large targets, superior in multi-target tracking and jamming resistance. Maximum Speed - Su-34M: Mach 1.8 (1,900 km/h). - F-16 Block 70/72: Mach 2.05 (2,100 km/h). Range - Combat range (radius): Su-34M 1,100 km (with typical load); F-16 550-700 km (hi-lo-hi mission). - Ferry range (maximum with tanks): Both 4,000-4,200 km. Avionics (main quantitative metrics) - Su-34M: Modernized digital avionics (2025), with EW Himalaya/Redut, reconnaissance pods (Sych/UKR-RT), improved processing but generation 4+. - F-16 Block 70/72: Advanced generation 4++ avionics, with high-capacity mission computer, integrated Viper Shield EW, Auto GCAS, and advanced data link (common with F-35). Weight - Empty weight: Su-34M 22,500 kg; F-16 ~9,000-9,500 kg. - Maximum takeoff weight (MTOW): Su-34M ~45,100 kg; F-16 ~21,800 kg. Altitude (service ceiling) - Su-34M: 15,000 m (49,200 ft). - F-16 Block 70/72: 15,240 m (50,000+ ft).
0:10

Su-34M vs F-16 Block 70/72 Radar - Su-34M: Modernized PESA radar (type B004/Novella or variants), target detection up to 250-300 km - F-16 Block 70/72: AESA AN/APG-83 (scaled from F-22/F-35), typical detection ~250-350 km for large targets, superior in multi-target tracking and jamming resistance. Maximum Speed - Su-34M: Mach 1.8 (1,900 km/h). - F-16 Block 70/72: Mach 2.05 (2,100 km/h). Range - Combat range (radius): Su-34M 1,100 km (with typical load); F-16 550-700 km (hi-lo-hi mission). - Ferry range (maximum with tanks): Both 4,000-4,200 km. Avionics (main quantitative metrics) - Su-34M: Modernized digital avionics (2025), with EW Himalaya/Redut, reconnaissance pods (Sych/UKR-RT), improved processing but generation 4+. - F-16 Block 70/72: Advanced generation 4++ avionics, with high-capacity mission computer, integrated Viper Shield EW, Auto GCAS, and advanced data link (common with F-35). Weight - Empty weight: Su-34M 22,500 kg; F-16 ~9,000-9,500 kg. - Maximum takeoff weight (MTOW): Su-34M ~45,100 kg; F-16 ~21,800 kg. Altitude (service ceiling) - Su-34M: 15,000 m (49,200 ft). - F-16 Block 70/72: 15,240 m (50,000+ ft).

Patricia Marins

23,150 views • 6 months ago

The Hell Duck is hunting. The Su-34 tactical fighter-bomber of the Russian Air Force drops four ODAB-1500UMPK at a range of up to 70 km. The ODAB-1500UMPK fuel-air bomb is the most powerful serial aircraft bomb in the world, it contains about 1,100 kg of liquid piperylene, aluminum and magnesium powder and ammonium nitrate, which are sprayed with a preliminary charge at an altitude of 10m. The explosion of each has a TNT equivalent of over 3-4.5 tons of TNT, depending on the weather and altitude above sea level. This time, the Banderites received up to 18t TNT with a slow and long blast wave, which removes minefields R = 200m, incapacitates engines of armored vehicles, causes detonation of anti-tank grenade launchers and ERA of MBTs. The range of infantry lethality, including in trenches and dugouts, is up to 450-600 m. Blackrussian
0:10

The Hell Duck is hunting. The Su-34 tactical fighter-bomber of the Russian Air Force drops four ODAB-1500UMPK at a range of up to 70 km. The ODAB-1500UMPK fuel-air bomb is the most powerful serial aircraft bomb in the world, it contains about 1,100 kg of liquid piperylene, aluminum and magnesium powder and ammonium nitrate, which are sprayed with a preliminary charge at an altitude of 10m. The explosion of each has a TNT equivalent of over 3-4.5 tons of TNT, depending on the weather and altitude above sea level. This time, the Banderites received up to 18t TNT with a slow and long blast wave, which removes minefields R = 200m, incapacitates engines of armored vehicles, causes detonation of anti-tank grenade launchers and ERA of MBTs. The range of infantry lethality, including in trenches and dugouts, is up to 450-600 m. Blackrussian

Маннюня🇷🇺🇸🇾

31,295 views • 11 months ago

🟪 MOSCOW IS FORCING RUSSIA TO MAKE A CHOICE 👀 A Pantsir air defense system fitted with an anti-drone “grill” has reportedly been spotted in Moscow, fueling speculation that Russia is continuing to redeploy air defense assets away from other areas in order to protect the capital. If true, the implications are significant. Air defense systems are not unlimited. Every Pantsir moved to Moscow is a Pantsir that cannot protect a logistics hub, ammunition depot, airfield, refinery, command center, or military formation elsewhere. This highlights one of the most important effects of Ukraine’s long-range drone campaign. Ukraine is no longer simply destroying targets. It is forcing Russia to make difficult choices. For years, Russian air defenses were concentrated around military facilities and the front. Now Moscow itself increasingly requires protection as Ukrainian drones reach deeper into Russian territory with growing frequency. The result is a dilemma for the Kremlin. Protect the front lines and logistics networks. Or protect Moscow. Protect refineries and military infrastructure. Or protect the political heart of Russia. The appearance of additional air defenses around the capital may suggest that Moscow is becoming a higher priority, and that alone represents a strategic success for Ukraine’s long-range strike campaign. Russia still possesses significant air defense capabilities, but even the largest arsenal has limits. The more territory Ukraine can threaten, the more Russia is forced to spread those defenses thin. And every system guarding Moscow is one less system guarding the war effort elsewhere.
0:14

🟪 MOSCOW IS FORCING RUSSIA TO MAKE A CHOICE 👀 A Pantsir air defense system fitted with an anti-drone “grill” has reportedly been spotted in Moscow, fueling speculation that Russia is continuing to redeploy air defense assets away from other areas in order to protect the capital. If true, the implications are significant. Air defense systems are not unlimited. Every Pantsir moved to Moscow is a Pantsir that cannot protect a logistics hub, ammunition depot, airfield, refinery, command center, or military formation elsewhere. This highlights one of the most important effects of Ukraine’s long-range drone campaign. Ukraine is no longer simply destroying targets. It is forcing Russia to make difficult choices. For years, Russian air defenses were concentrated around military facilities and the front. Now Moscow itself increasingly requires protection as Ukrainian drones reach deeper into Russian territory with growing frequency. The result is a dilemma for the Kremlin. Protect the front lines and logistics networks. Or protect Moscow. Protect refineries and military infrastructure. Or protect the political heart of Russia. The appearance of additional air defenses around the capital may suggest that Moscow is becoming a higher priority, and that alone represents a strategic success for Ukraine’s long-range strike campaign. Russia still possesses significant air defense capabilities, but even the largest arsenal has limits. The more territory Ukraine can threaten, the more Russia is forced to spread those defenses thin. And every system guarding Moscow is one less system guarding the war effort elsewhere.

Gianl1974

14,714 views • 1 month ago

🇵🇱 Poland is weaponizing its domestic industry for a massive conflict by striking a deal to build thousands of cheap, long-range American Barracuda cruise missiles every year. This massive production run creates a nightmare scenario for Moscow, giving Warsaw the independent firepower to strike targets deep inside Russian territory. ✅ The giant of the Polish defense industry, the company Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa, plans to master the production of the Barracuda-500M cruise missile developed by the American company Anduril. 🔻 Signing the corresponding agreement with Anduril is a highly important event for the Polish military industry. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk stated that this is "bad news for Mordor," implying Russia. It is planned to jointly produce several thousand Barracuda-500Ms annually. 🔻 The Barracuda-500M is a small-sized cruise missile designed for mass production and is distinguished by its low cost compared to counterparts. The warhead is 45 kg, but the flight range reaches 900 km when launched from an aircraft. The Barracuda-500M can also be launched from a ground launcher using a rocket booster, though in this case, the flight range drops to 700 km. The Poles plan to use Barracuda-500M cruise missiles from F-16 and F-35 fighter jets. This industrial leap completely alters Eastern Europe's military balance by removing the cost barrier of traditional cruise missiles. By turning F-16s and F-35s into ultra-long-range launchpads capable of reaching 900 km, Poland is surrounding "Mordor" with a cheap, un-interceptable swarm of precision weapons, making any potential Kremlin aggression a suicidal move. Video is generated by grok AI
0:10

🇵🇱 Poland is weaponizing its domestic industry for a massive conflict by striking a deal to build thousands of cheap, long-range American Barracuda cruise missiles every year. This massive production run creates a nightmare scenario for Moscow, giving Warsaw the independent firepower to strike targets deep inside Russian territory. ✅ The giant of the Polish defense industry, the company Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa, plans to master the production of the Barracuda-500M cruise missile developed by the American company Anduril. 🔻 Signing the corresponding agreement with Anduril is a highly important event for the Polish military industry. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk stated that this is "bad news for Mordor," implying Russia. It is planned to jointly produce several thousand Barracuda-500Ms annually. 🔻 The Barracuda-500M is a small-sized cruise missile designed for mass production and is distinguished by its low cost compared to counterparts. The warhead is 45 kg, but the flight range reaches 900 km when launched from an aircraft. The Barracuda-500M can also be launched from a ground launcher using a rocket booster, though in this case, the flight range drops to 700 km. The Poles plan to use Barracuda-500M cruise missiles from F-16 and F-35 fighter jets. This industrial leap completely alters Eastern Europe's military balance by removing the cost barrier of traditional cruise missiles. By turning F-16s and F-35s into ultra-long-range launchpads capable of reaching 900 km, Poland is surrounding "Mordor" with a cheap, un-interceptable swarm of precision weapons, making any potential Kremlin aggression a suicidal move. Video is generated by grok AI

NSTRIKE

187,917 views • 26 days ago

Chinese aircrafts are competitive, but time will tell about reliability. Since we've been discussing Chinese aviation lately, I want to show how Chinese aircraft are becoming increasingly competitive in a market traditionally dominated by the West and Russia. The J-35 and KF-21 are expected to enter the market only by the end of 2026 or early 2027. However, I have estimated their costs. I dare say that, with the current level of automation in the Chinese defense industry, the prices of these aircraft are likely to decrease even further. The Gripen and Su-35 are competitive, but what attracts most to the Su-35 is the R-37M missile, which has a range of up to 400 km and its radar irbis-E Reaching also 400km. It operationally both reaches 350 km would be already significant advantage without analogous. Western aviation remains expensive, and in my view, it will only become more competitive with the arrival of the AIM-260 missile, which has a range of over 300 km. Additionally, maintenance costs are very high, with the Gripen again standing out in that aspect as a cost-effective option for acquisition and maintenance. Another advantage are the interoperability on multiple terrains. Values are based on recent deals and local estimates. Costs can vary depending on the package. - J-10C: Cost: 40-50M. Radar: AESA KLJ-7A (~150-170 km). Missiles: PL-15 (~200-250 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$8,000-$9,000. - J-35 (FC-31): Cost: 70-85M. Radar: AESA (~200+ km). Missiles: PL-15 (~200-250 km); PL-21 (>300 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: $10,000-$15,000. - Rafale: Cost: 80-120M. Radar: RBE2-AA AESA (~200 km). Missiles: Meteor (>150 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$16,000-$22,000. - Su-30: Cost: 50-86M. Radar: Bars PESA (~150-200 km). Missiles: R-37 (~300 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$10,000-$12,000. - Su-35: Cost: 80-90M. Radar: Irbis-E PESA (~350-400 km). Missiles: R-37M (~300-400 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$12,000-15,000. - F-16C/D (Block 70): Cost: 80-120M. Radar: APG-83 SABR AESA (~135-160 km). Missiles: AIM-120D (~160-180 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$25,000-$44,000. - Eurofighter Typhoon: Cost: 110-117M. Radar: Captor-E AESA (>200 km). Missiles: Meteor (>150 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$30,000-$45,000. - Gripen E: Cost: 85-120M. Radar: Raven ES-05 AESA (~200-250 km). Missiles: Meteor (>150 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$6,000-$7,000. - KF-21 Boramae: Cost: 70-110M. Radar: AESA (~150-200 km). Missiles: Meteor (>150 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$15,000-$20,000. - JF-17 Thunder (Block III): Cost: 40-60M. Radar: AESA KLJ-7A (~170 km). Missiles: PL-15 (~200-250 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$5,000-$11,000.
0:13

Chinese aircrafts are competitive, but time will tell about reliability. Since we've been discussing Chinese aviation lately, I want to show how Chinese aircraft are becoming increasingly competitive in a market traditionally dominated by the West and Russia. The J-35 and KF-21 are expected to enter the market only by the end of 2026 or early 2027. However, I have estimated their costs. I dare say that, with the current level of automation in the Chinese defense industry, the prices of these aircraft are likely to decrease even further. The Gripen and Su-35 are competitive, but what attracts most to the Su-35 is the R-37M missile, which has a range of up to 400 km and its radar irbis-E Reaching also 400km. It operationally both reaches 350 km would be already significant advantage without analogous. Western aviation remains expensive, and in my view, it will only become more competitive with the arrival of the AIM-260 missile, which has a range of over 300 km. Additionally, maintenance costs are very high, with the Gripen again standing out in that aspect as a cost-effective option for acquisition and maintenance. Another advantage are the interoperability on multiple terrains. Values are based on recent deals and local estimates. Costs can vary depending on the package. - J-10C: Cost: 40-50M. Radar: AESA KLJ-7A (~150-170 km). Missiles: PL-15 (~200-250 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$8,000-$9,000. - J-35 (FC-31): Cost: 70-85M. Radar: AESA (~200+ km). Missiles: PL-15 (~200-250 km); PL-21 (>300 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: $10,000-$15,000. - Rafale: Cost: 80-120M. Radar: RBE2-AA AESA (~200 km). Missiles: Meteor (>150 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$16,000-$22,000. - Su-30: Cost: 50-86M. Radar: Bars PESA (~150-200 km). Missiles: R-37 (~300 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$10,000-$12,000. - Su-35: Cost: 80-90M. Radar: Irbis-E PESA (~350-400 km). Missiles: R-37M (~300-400 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$12,000-15,000. - F-16C/D (Block 70): Cost: 80-120M. Radar: APG-83 SABR AESA (~135-160 km). Missiles: AIM-120D (~160-180 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$25,000-$44,000. - Eurofighter Typhoon: Cost: 110-117M. Radar: Captor-E AESA (>200 km). Missiles: Meteor (>150 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$30,000-$45,000. - Gripen E: Cost: 85-120M. Radar: Raven ES-05 AESA (~200-250 km). Missiles: Meteor (>150 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$6,000-$7,000. - KF-21 Boramae: Cost: 70-110M. Radar: AESA (~150-200 km). Missiles: Meteor (>150 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$15,000-$20,000. - JF-17 Thunder (Block III): Cost: 40-60M. Radar: AESA KLJ-7A (~170 km). Missiles: PL-15 (~200-250 km). Maintenance cost per flight hour: ~$5,000-$11,000.

Patricia Marins

182,621 views • 10 months ago

🚨🇨🇳U.S. IN PANIC: China's J-35 Stealth Fighter Now in 'Beast Mode' With Increased Firepower China's J-35 fifth-generation stealth fighter has been seen in a new configuration carrying four PL-15 long-range air-to-air missiles on external pylons under its wings. Combined with the six missiles it carries inside its internal weapons bays, the aircraft can now go into combat with up to ten air-to-air missiles in total. 🔸This setup is informally called "beast mode" — a term borrowed from the U.S. military's similar configuration for the F-35. The idea is straightforward: the aircraft trades some of its stealth capability for significantly more firepower. When weapons are carried externally, they increase the aircraft's radar signature, making it more visible to enemy systems. However, the PL-15 missile's long range means the J-35 can potentially engage enemy aircraft from a safe distance before that visibility becomes a serious problem. 🔸The J-35 entered service in 2025 in both Air Force and Navy variants. The naval version is designed to operate from Chinese supercarriers such as the Fujian. Both versions are considered among the most advanced fifth-generation fighters in the world today, alongside the J-20 and the American F-35 — all three of which are regarded as more sophisticated than the older F-22 or Russia's Su-57. 🔸Within China's own air fleet, the J-35 is expected to serve as a lighter and more affordable complement to the larger and more powerful J-20, which carries a bigger radar, heavier weapons load, and longer range. The J-20 is expected to remain the priority for large-scale procurement, while the J-35 fills a broader operational role at lower cost. Do you think the U.S. can really counter it? NewRulesGeopolitics❗️
0:19

🚨🇨🇳U.S. IN PANIC: China's J-35 Stealth Fighter Now in 'Beast Mode' With Increased Firepower China's J-35 fifth-generation stealth fighter has been seen in a new configuration carrying four PL-15 long-range air-to-air missiles on external pylons under its wings. Combined with the six missiles it carries inside its internal weapons bays, the aircraft can now go into combat with up to ten air-to-air missiles in total. 🔸This setup is informally called "beast mode" — a term borrowed from the U.S. military's similar configuration for the F-35. The idea is straightforward: the aircraft trades some of its stealth capability for significantly more firepower. When weapons are carried externally, they increase the aircraft's radar signature, making it more visible to enemy systems. However, the PL-15 missile's long range means the J-35 can potentially engage enemy aircraft from a safe distance before that visibility becomes a serious problem. 🔸The J-35 entered service in 2025 in both Air Force and Navy variants. The naval version is designed to operate from Chinese supercarriers such as the Fujian. Both versions are considered among the most advanced fifth-generation fighters in the world today, alongside the J-20 and the American F-35 — all three of which are regarded as more sophisticated than the older F-22 or Russia's Su-57. 🔸Within China's own air fleet, the J-35 is expected to serve as a lighter and more affordable complement to the larger and more powerful J-20, which carries a bigger radar, heavier weapons load, and longer range. The J-20 is expected to remain the priority for large-scale procurement, while the J-35 fills a broader operational role at lower cost. Do you think the U.S. can really counter it? NewRulesGeopolitics❗️

🇷🇺 STANISLAV KRAPIVNIK 🇷🇺

11,360 views • 2 months ago

The Chinese are flying 4 sixth-generation prototypes, but what does that mean? While the West keeps debating wars that seem never-ending, huh, China is flying low – or rather, high! – improving their 6th generation fighter prototypes, like the J-36/J-50, with total focus on advanced integration. This gives a huge strategic advantage, with emphasis on long-range missiles and multiple guidance to dominate global scenarios. China already has about 4 6th generation prototypes and plans to reach 8, selecting the most adapted one. All this under the General Concept: Indestructible Flying Brain: 6th generation fighters go way beyond just a slightly improved stealth; they are central platforms that command a global war web via AI, drones, and varied weapons, making previous fighters obsolete in connectivity and limiting them to very local operations. This omnipresence redefines air superiority, with the fighter surviving as a resilient node in the first hours of conflicts and being able to operate with speed. Kill Web: The Global War Web: The fighter acts as the central node of a real-time network, connecting submarines, satellites, ships, drones, and troops worldwide. It allows omnipresence, receiving data from a destroyer thousands of km away and attacking as if it were right nearby, with AI assisting the pilot in analysis and target acquisition. That's why the Chinese focus on missiles with ranges of thousands of km, with multiple guidance, turning the 6th generation pilot into a tactical manager very different from today's. Being a 6th generation fighter pilot is going to demand a lot. Command of Drone Swarms (CCA/Loyal Wingman) The fighter controls 6-20 drones simultaneously for reconnaissance, jamming, or suicide attacks. It transforms the pilot (or AI) into a "maestro" of a robotic orchestra, or quarterback of Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCAs), which carry extra weapons, expanding offensive power without exposing the main fighter. Like, a controlled symphony of destruction! Superior Multi-Spectral Stealth (Stealth++) Not limited to radar, it covers infrared, acoustic, visual, and electromagnetic. It uses advanced materials, tailless designs, and minimal thermal signature to penetrate dense A2/AD defenses, making it extremely hard to detect and essential for operations in contested environments. Extreme Range, Autonomy, and New Generation Weapons Combat radius of 1,800-2,500 km without refueling, with sustained supercruise (Mach 1.5-2.0) without afterburner, thanks to adaptive cycle engines and huge internal tanks. There's talk of including lasers, but so far, what's really there are internal hypersonic missiles and 2-3x greater armament capacity than the F-35, all while maintaining total stealth. Artificial Intelligence, Integrated Sensors, Resilience, and Open Architecture AI as co-pilot or main, processing data in real time and making tactical decisions to reduce human load; optionally manned mode: piloted, remote, or autonomous flight; virtual cockpit via helmet visor. Multifunctional sensors combine radar, electronic warfare, communications, and non-kinetic effects, with total data fusion transforming the fighter into a flying data center. Network resistant to jamming and GPS loss via quantum-resistant communications, mesh networks, and inertial/computer vision navigation. Modular architecture allows quick upgrades (90% by software), avoiding high costs like in the F-35; in "Decision Centric Warfare," AI decides in milliseconds, with the human as an optional bottleneck, including cyber warfare and active defense. In another article, I'll talk about what I think of this in terms of costs and demand and if such an investment is really worth it.
0:13

The Chinese are flying 4 sixth-generation prototypes, but what does that mean? While the West keeps debating wars that seem never-ending, huh, China is flying low – or rather, high! – improving their 6th generation fighter prototypes, like the J-36/J-50, with total focus on advanced integration. This gives a huge strategic advantage, with emphasis on long-range missiles and multiple guidance to dominate global scenarios. China already has about 4 6th generation prototypes and plans to reach 8, selecting the most adapted one. All this under the General Concept: Indestructible Flying Brain: 6th generation fighters go way beyond just a slightly improved stealth; they are central platforms that command a global war web via AI, drones, and varied weapons, making previous fighters obsolete in connectivity and limiting them to very local operations. This omnipresence redefines air superiority, with the fighter surviving as a resilient node in the first hours of conflicts and being able to operate with speed. Kill Web: The Global War Web: The fighter acts as the central node of a real-time network, connecting submarines, satellites, ships, drones, and troops worldwide. It allows omnipresence, receiving data from a destroyer thousands of km away and attacking as if it were right nearby, with AI assisting the pilot in analysis and target acquisition. That's why the Chinese focus on missiles with ranges of thousands of km, with multiple guidance, turning the 6th generation pilot into a tactical manager very different from today's. Being a 6th generation fighter pilot is going to demand a lot. Command of Drone Swarms (CCA/Loyal Wingman) The fighter controls 6-20 drones simultaneously for reconnaissance, jamming, or suicide attacks. It transforms the pilot (or AI) into a "maestro" of a robotic orchestra, or quarterback of Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCAs), which carry extra weapons, expanding offensive power without exposing the main fighter. Like, a controlled symphony of destruction! Superior Multi-Spectral Stealth (Stealth++) Not limited to radar, it covers infrared, acoustic, visual, and electromagnetic. It uses advanced materials, tailless designs, and minimal thermal signature to penetrate dense A2/AD defenses, making it extremely hard to detect and essential for operations in contested environments. Extreme Range, Autonomy, and New Generation Weapons Combat radius of 1,800-2,500 km without refueling, with sustained supercruise (Mach 1.5-2.0) without afterburner, thanks to adaptive cycle engines and huge internal tanks. There's talk of including lasers, but so far, what's really there are internal hypersonic missiles and 2-3x greater armament capacity than the F-35, all while maintaining total stealth. Artificial Intelligence, Integrated Sensors, Resilience, and Open Architecture AI as co-pilot or main, processing data in real time and making tactical decisions to reduce human load; optionally manned mode: piloted, remote, or autonomous flight; virtual cockpit via helmet visor. Multifunctional sensors combine radar, electronic warfare, communications, and non-kinetic effects, with total data fusion transforming the fighter into a flying data center. Network resistant to jamming and GPS loss via quantum-resistant communications, mesh networks, and inertial/computer vision navigation. Modular architecture allows quick upgrades (90% by software), avoiding high costs like in the F-35; in "Decision Centric Warfare," AI decides in milliseconds, with the human as an optional bottleneck, including cyber warfare and active defense. In another article, I'll talk about what I think of this in terms of costs and demand and if such an investment is really worth it.

Patricia Marins

60,403 views • 8 months ago

Iran’s Post-War Air Defense: Changes in System Integration and Deployment Tactics The 12-Day War, marked by Israeli air superiority, prompted accelerated reforms in mobility, autonomy, and hybrid integration in Iranian air defenses, particularly in their long-range battery, the Bavar-373. 1. Hardware Changes - Miniaturization and Autonomy (TELAR): The Babar-373-II now integrates AESA radars into each launcher, eliminating cables and vulnerable central radars, enabling independent operations. The range is 300-400 km for large targets and about 85-150 km for stealth fighters. - New Sayyad-4B+ Missiles: Featuring dual seekers (active radar and IR), extended range (300-400 km), and a focus on counter-stealth, Iran believes these new missiles can overcome jamming and past failures against drones heavy drones. - Integration of the Arman System: This is Iran's equivalent to AEGIS, covering medium-range defense (up to 120 km) in self-sufficient vehicles. Investments improved setup agility to just 3 minutes; moreover, if links fail due to satellite disruptions like last year, both the Bavar-373-II and the 15th Khordad can continue operating autonomously. This was a major issue for Iran that caused blackouts in their air defenses. - Surveillance Drones as "Flying Radars": Models like the Mohajer-10 and Karrar conduct patrols and transmit data via satellites (BeiDou), allowing passive detection and keeping radars off until engagement. 2. Tactical Changes - Radar Ambush (Passive Tracking): The implementation of modern sensors was another shift. Now, optical/IRST sensors and drones detect targets; radars activate only for seconds to lock on, reducing exposure to counter-attacks. - Geographic Dispersion: This autonomy allows units to spread across 10-15 km² in tunnels and civilian sheds, emerging only after drone alerts and integrating with smaller systems for layers resistant to saturation. It seems Iran is attempting an interesting tactic that could work if cyber elements don't cause issues. - Radical "Shoot-and-Scoot" Mobility: I've never seen this tactic with long-range air systems before, but Iran claims repositioning in under 4 minutes, with logistics for remote reloads, transforming this system tactically like MLRS or artillery. 3. Post-War Comparative (2025 vs. 2026) Comparing configurations before and after the war, in 2025 connections relied on physical cables and centralized infrastructure, while in 2026 it adopts wireless datalinks with independent launchers, seemingly built with Chinese assistance. Dependency evolved from a giant, vulnerable search radar to a hybrid sensor network incorporating drones, IRST systems, and satellites. Reaction time, which previously took a long time to move the entire battery, is now reduced to under 4 minutes for the first vehicle to depart. Finally, the target focus shifted from conventional missiles and aircraft to advanced threats, such as counter-stealth, counter-drones, and, according to them, even hypersonic missiles. 4. Persistent Fragilities - Slow Reload Logistics: Missile reloading takes 30-60 minutes with cranes, exposing them to orbital surveillance. However, all heavy batteries are like this. - Datalink Vulnerability: Although Iran has strong link protection technology as seen in drone, it has limits against interference, and the number of American assets dedicated to this indicates that jamming or hacking loads won't be small. - Massive Thermal Signature: Heat from the chassis detectable by LEO satellites is another vulnerability that would also nullify camouflage, but it's the same with every system. - Radar Horizon vs. Cruise Missiles: The truck-embedded radar has a short tracking radius of 35-45 km, with a brief reaction against low-altitude or terrain-masking threats, which in certain situations could favor Tomahawks.
0:12

Iran’s Post-War Air Defense: Changes in System Integration and Deployment Tactics The 12-Day War, marked by Israeli air superiority, prompted accelerated reforms in mobility, autonomy, and hybrid integration in Iranian air defenses, particularly in their long-range battery, the Bavar-373. 1. Hardware Changes - Miniaturization and Autonomy (TELAR): The Babar-373-II now integrates AESA radars into each launcher, eliminating cables and vulnerable central radars, enabling independent operations. The range is 300-400 km for large targets and about 85-150 km for stealth fighters. - New Sayyad-4B+ Missiles: Featuring dual seekers (active radar and IR), extended range (300-400 km), and a focus on counter-stealth, Iran believes these new missiles can overcome jamming and past failures against drones heavy drones. - Integration of the Arman System: This is Iran's equivalent to AEGIS, covering medium-range defense (up to 120 km) in self-sufficient vehicles. Investments improved setup agility to just 3 minutes; moreover, if links fail due to satellite disruptions like last year, both the Bavar-373-II and the 15th Khordad can continue operating autonomously. This was a major issue for Iran that caused blackouts in their air defenses. - Surveillance Drones as "Flying Radars": Models like the Mohajer-10 and Karrar conduct patrols and transmit data via satellites (BeiDou), allowing passive detection and keeping radars off until engagement. 2. Tactical Changes - Radar Ambush (Passive Tracking): The implementation of modern sensors was another shift. Now, optical/IRST sensors and drones detect targets; radars activate only for seconds to lock on, reducing exposure to counter-attacks. - Geographic Dispersion: This autonomy allows units to spread across 10-15 km² in tunnels and civilian sheds, emerging only after drone alerts and integrating with smaller systems for layers resistant to saturation. It seems Iran is attempting an interesting tactic that could work if cyber elements don't cause issues. - Radical "Shoot-and-Scoot" Mobility: I've never seen this tactic with long-range air systems before, but Iran claims repositioning in under 4 minutes, with logistics for remote reloads, transforming this system tactically like MLRS or artillery. 3. Post-War Comparative (2025 vs. 2026) Comparing configurations before and after the war, in 2025 connections relied on physical cables and centralized infrastructure, while in 2026 it adopts wireless datalinks with independent launchers, seemingly built with Chinese assistance. Dependency evolved from a giant, vulnerable search radar to a hybrid sensor network incorporating drones, IRST systems, and satellites. Reaction time, which previously took a long time to move the entire battery, is now reduced to under 4 minutes for the first vehicle to depart. Finally, the target focus shifted from conventional missiles and aircraft to advanced threats, such as counter-stealth, counter-drones, and, according to them, even hypersonic missiles. 4. Persistent Fragilities - Slow Reload Logistics: Missile reloading takes 30-60 minutes with cranes, exposing them to orbital surveillance. However, all heavy batteries are like this. - Datalink Vulnerability: Although Iran has strong link protection technology as seen in drone, it has limits against interference, and the number of American assets dedicated to this indicates that jamming or hacking loads won't be small. - Massive Thermal Signature: Heat from the chassis detectable by LEO satellites is another vulnerability that would also nullify camouflage, but it's the same with every system. - Radar Horizon vs. Cruise Missiles: The truck-embedded radar has a short tracking radius of 35-45 km, with a brief reaction against low-altitude or terrain-masking threats, which in certain situations could favor Tomahawks.

Patricia Marins

69,042 views • 5 months ago

China Successfully Tests New Hypersonic Missile with 8,000 km Range The Chinese have successfully tested a variant of a hypersonic missile, which is actually a glide vehicle: the DF-27A. The average speed was Mach 8.6, and it covered 2,100 km in 12 minutes. This is just one more in a series of several Chinese anti-ship missiles. While much of the West treats military service as an economic activity, the Chinese are preparing for a real war. There is no room there for playing around with a new class of battleships or listening to the lobby for expensive energy. China has a national industrial and military project that Western nations currently can only dream of achieving. Of course, it's part of the Western style to live life differently. But there is a serious missile gap, with China far ahead of the West. An 8,000 km range means hitting a ship in Hawaii without leaving mainland China. And there are other missile models with ranges of 3,000–4,000 km. Intercepting these hypersonic missiles once launched is extremely difficult, but what can be done is to prevent them from having precise guidance capability. Just as land doctrines are being redesigned, so is naval warfare, by hypersonic missiles and aerial and underwater drones. Projects are now underway for drones capable of bypassing protective nets. Today, the Chinese have more missiles in stock than the Soviets had at their peak. And I won't even mention drones, as the numbers are almost unimaginable. Only a major reform could improve the West’s position. The West is currently developing some missile systems that should be available around 2030, but a doctrinal reform is also necessary. Countries cannot fight in 2025 the same way wars were fought decades ago; a complete reform is required. This reminds me of Ukrainian soldiers who, after being trained in the West and then facing the reality of the battlefield, said that the training was completely inadequate for the kind of war they were actually fighting. It is precisely to avoid this kind of mismatch that reforms need to be carried out. *Illustrative video- may contain inaccuracies.*
0:16

China Successfully Tests New Hypersonic Missile with 8,000 km Range The Chinese have successfully tested a variant of a hypersonic missile, which is actually a glide vehicle: the DF-27A. The average speed was Mach 8.6, and it covered 2,100 km in 12 minutes. This is just one more in a series of several Chinese anti-ship missiles. While much of the West treats military service as an economic activity, the Chinese are preparing for a real war. There is no room there for playing around with a new class of battleships or listening to the lobby for expensive energy. China has a national industrial and military project that Western nations currently can only dream of achieving. Of course, it's part of the Western style to live life differently. But there is a serious missile gap, with China far ahead of the West. An 8,000 km range means hitting a ship in Hawaii without leaving mainland China. And there are other missile models with ranges of 3,000–4,000 km. Intercepting these hypersonic missiles once launched is extremely difficult, but what can be done is to prevent them from having precise guidance capability. Just as land doctrines are being redesigned, so is naval warfare, by hypersonic missiles and aerial and underwater drones. Projects are now underway for drones capable of bypassing protective nets. Today, the Chinese have more missiles in stock than the Soviets had at their peak. And I won't even mention drones, as the numbers are almost unimaginable. Only a major reform could improve the West’s position. The West is currently developing some missile systems that should be available around 2030, but a doctrinal reform is also necessary. Countries cannot fight in 2025 the same way wars were fought decades ago; a complete reform is required. This reminds me of Ukrainian soldiers who, after being trained in the West and then facing the reality of the battlefield, said that the training was completely inadequate for the kind of war they were actually fighting. It is precisely to avoid this kind of mismatch that reforms need to be carried out. *Illustrative video- may contain inaccuracies.*

Patricia Marins

23,068 views • 7 months ago

The Russian FAB-3000 with Extended 200 km Glide Kit: A Devastating Precision Weapon The FAB-3000, or Fugasnaya Aviabomba 3000, represents one of Russia's most formidable unguided aerial bombs from the Soviet era, now revolutionized by modern glide kits. Originally developed in the 1950s as a high-explosive demolition weapon, the FAB-3000 weighs approximately 3,000 kilograms (6,614 pounds), with a length of 3.84 meters and a diameter of 680 millimeters. Its warhead contains about 1,370 kilograms of TNT or a similar high-explosive filler, capable of generating a blast radius exceeding 200 meters and penetrating up to 1.5 meters of reinforced concrete. Designed for strategic bombing, it was historically dropped from heavy bombers like the Tu-22M3, but its revival in contemporary conflicts stems from integration with advanced guidance systems. The key transformation comes from the Universal Module for Planning and Correction (UMPK), a tail-mounted kit produced by Russia's Bazalt Design Bureau. The standard UMPK equips the bomb with folding wings spanning up to 3 meters when deployed, a streamlined fairing for aerodynamic stability, and a satellite-navigation system using GLONASS for mid-course corrections. This converts the inert FAB-3000 into a standoff glide bomb, extending its effective range from a mere free-fall drop to 50-60 kilometers when released from altitudes of 5,000-12,000 meters. Guidance achieves a circular error probable (CEP) of 10-30 meters, allowing strikes on bunkers, fortifications, and urban targets with minimal collateral risk compared to unguided variants. The kit adds roughly 200-250 kilograms, including control surfaces and inertial sensors, and is compatible with Su-34 fighter-bombers, which carry it externally on the centerline pylon. Recent upgrades have pushed the envelope further with the jet-powered UMPK-PD variant, achieving an extended range of up to 200 kilometers. This iteration incorporates a compact turbojet engine—sourced from commercial Chinese suppliers like the SW800Pro-Y—mounted in a tubular rear section, providing thrust for powered gliding. The design features enhanced aerodynamics with a curved, sloping tail and lighter composite materials, reducing drag by 20-30%. A 12-antenna controlled reception pattern antenna (CRPA) array bolsters resistance to electronic warfare jamming, ensuring reliable terminal guidance even in contested airspace. Released from high altitudes, the bomb rotates 180 degrees post-drop, deploying wings and igniting the engine for sustained propulsion, reaching speeds of 800-900 km/h. In operational terms, the FAB-3000-UMPK-PD has been combat-tested in eastern Ukraine since mid-2025, targeting deep rear-area logistics and command nodes. Its 1.4-ton explosive yield can level multi-story buildings or crater runways, while the standoff capability shields launch aircraft from ground fire. Production ramps up at facilities like the Izhevsk Mechanical Plant, with monthly outputs exceeding 500 units. However, challenges persist: the bomb's mass limits fuel efficiency, capping practical range at 150-180 kilometers under load, and vulnerability to advanced air defenses remains a concern. Nonetheless, this evolution underscores Russia's shift toward affordable, mass-produced precision munitions, blending Cold War brute force with 21st-century lethality.
0:12

The Russian FAB-3000 with Extended 200 km Glide Kit: A Devastating Precision Weapon The FAB-3000, or Fugasnaya Aviabomba 3000, represents one of Russia's most formidable unguided aerial bombs from the Soviet era, now revolutionized by modern glide kits. Originally developed in the 1950s as a high-explosive demolition weapon, the FAB-3000 weighs approximately 3,000 kilograms (6,614 pounds), with a length of 3.84 meters and a diameter of 680 millimeters. Its warhead contains about 1,370 kilograms of TNT or a similar high-explosive filler, capable of generating a blast radius exceeding 200 meters and penetrating up to 1.5 meters of reinforced concrete. Designed for strategic bombing, it was historically dropped from heavy bombers like the Tu-22M3, but its revival in contemporary conflicts stems from integration with advanced guidance systems. The key transformation comes from the Universal Module for Planning and Correction (UMPK), a tail-mounted kit produced by Russia's Bazalt Design Bureau. The standard UMPK equips the bomb with folding wings spanning up to 3 meters when deployed, a streamlined fairing for aerodynamic stability, and a satellite-navigation system using GLONASS for mid-course corrections. This converts the inert FAB-3000 into a standoff glide bomb, extending its effective range from a mere free-fall drop to 50-60 kilometers when released from altitudes of 5,000-12,000 meters. Guidance achieves a circular error probable (CEP) of 10-30 meters, allowing strikes on bunkers, fortifications, and urban targets with minimal collateral risk compared to unguided variants. The kit adds roughly 200-250 kilograms, including control surfaces and inertial sensors, and is compatible with Su-34 fighter-bombers, which carry it externally on the centerline pylon. Recent upgrades have pushed the envelope further with the jet-powered UMPK-PD variant, achieving an extended range of up to 200 kilometers. This iteration incorporates a compact turbojet engine—sourced from commercial Chinese suppliers like the SW800Pro-Y—mounted in a tubular rear section, providing thrust for powered gliding. The design features enhanced aerodynamics with a curved, sloping tail and lighter composite materials, reducing drag by 20-30%. A 12-antenna controlled reception pattern antenna (CRPA) array bolsters resistance to electronic warfare jamming, ensuring reliable terminal guidance even in contested airspace. Released from high altitudes, the bomb rotates 180 degrees post-drop, deploying wings and igniting the engine for sustained propulsion, reaching speeds of 800-900 km/h. In operational terms, the FAB-3000-UMPK-PD has been combat-tested in eastern Ukraine since mid-2025, targeting deep rear-area logistics and command nodes. Its 1.4-ton explosive yield can level multi-story buildings or crater runways, while the standoff capability shields launch aircraft from ground fire. Production ramps up at facilities like the Izhevsk Mechanical Plant, with monthly outputs exceeding 500 units. However, challenges persist: the bomb's mass limits fuel efficiency, capping practical range at 150-180 kilometers under load, and vulnerability to advanced air defenses remains a concern. Nonetheless, this evolution underscores Russia's shift toward affordable, mass-produced precision munitions, blending Cold War brute force with 21st-century lethality.

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

45,498 views • 9 months ago

We continue to analyze the technical details of the war with Iran, and we would like to note the Iranian novelty - subsonic barraging anti-aircraft missiles Missile 358, equipped with compact turbojet engines. To some extent unexpectedly, they showed good effectiveness against Israeli reconnaissance and strike UAVs Hermes-900. The key role is played by the thermal homing head: it is able to reliably detect and track a wide range of heat-contrasting targets, including UAVs with various flight profiles. An additional advantage is the command and telemetry channel, which ensures data transmission and allows for radio correction of the trajectory. This is especially important in situations when the target attempts to disrupt the capture with infrared decoys or other means of counteraction. According to the stated parameters, the range of application of Missile 358 reaches about 100 km. At the same time, the maximum interception altitude is about 8.5 km, and the speed is up to 700 km/h, which expands the capabilities of the complex in covering objects and intercepting medium-altitude UAVs. Of course, this is a niche tool, and compared to solid-fuel missiles, the turbojet engine provides exponentially higher flight energy. This allows to dramatically increase the range at low speed, and the mass of the main units of the ammunition, its warhead and control system. On the other hand, this is a solution of necessity, because classic anti-aircraft missiles perfectly hit such high-altitude and slow-moving targets. But for such ammunition, no radar, complex and expensive beam installations are required, which greatly improves its survivability under constant air strikes. And in its niche of targets, there are enough of them, as such UAVs of Israel and the USA are the basis of UCAV, and are constantly over the territory of Iran. So with the 358th ammunition, you can score quite a lot of frags, and significantly complicate air strikes on Iran for the Epstein coalition. Russian Engineer -
0:15

We continue to analyze the technical details of the war with Iran, and we would like to note the Iranian novelty - subsonic barraging anti-aircraft missiles Missile 358, equipped with compact turbojet engines. To some extent unexpectedly, they showed good effectiveness against Israeli reconnaissance and strike UAVs Hermes-900. The key role is played by the thermal homing head: it is able to reliably detect and track a wide range of heat-contrasting targets, including UAVs with various flight profiles. An additional advantage is the command and telemetry channel, which ensures data transmission and allows for radio correction of the trajectory. This is especially important in situations when the target attempts to disrupt the capture with infrared decoys or other means of counteraction. According to the stated parameters, the range of application of Missile 358 reaches about 100 km. At the same time, the maximum interception altitude is about 8.5 km, and the speed is up to 700 km/h, which expands the capabilities of the complex in covering objects and intercepting medium-altitude UAVs. Of course, this is a niche tool, and compared to solid-fuel missiles, the turbojet engine provides exponentially higher flight energy. This allows to dramatically increase the range at low speed, and the mass of the main units of the ammunition, its warhead and control system. On the other hand, this is a solution of necessity, because classic anti-aircraft missiles perfectly hit such high-altitude and slow-moving targets. But for such ammunition, no radar, complex and expensive beam installations are required, which greatly improves its survivability under constant air strikes. And in its niche of targets, there are enough of them, as such UAVs of Israel and the USA are the basis of UCAV, and are constantly over the territory of Iran. So with the 358th ammunition, you can score quite a lot of frags, and significantly complicate air strikes on Iran for the Epstein coalition. Russian Engineer -

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

17,874 views • 4 months ago

Hello Tata Motors I purchased a Tata Nexon EV (30 kWh battery pack) on 10 February 2024 for around ₹18 Lakhs. Tata claimed a range of 325 KM, but throughout my ownership I NEVER received more than 175 KM on a full charge. Now the condition has become even worse. My battery drains so fast that I can barely drive 90 KM per charge. After reporting this issue, even the service center admitted there is a battery problem. At the time of purchase, Tata Motors clearly promised an 8-year / 160,000 KM battery warranty and assured us that defective batteries would be replaced with NEW ones. But now, when the issue has actually occurred, they are trying to replace my battery with a REFURBISHED (second-hand) battery instead of a new one. I raised this issue in February 2026. It has been months, and despite continuous follow-ups, there is still no battery replacement and no proper response from Tata Motors. What is more shocking is that Tata keeps blaming driving habits for the poor range. But according to THEIR OWN meter, my average consumption over the last 6434 KM is 91 Wh/KM, which technically should deliver around 329 KM range. Yet in reality, I never received anything close to that. To make things worse, the car makes frightening noises while charging. Honestly, it feels unsafe and scary, as if something could go seriously wrong at any moment. And when I asked Tata about exchanging this problematic vehicle, they offered only ₹5 Lakhs for a well-maintained 1.5-year-old car purchased for ₹18 Lakhs. Is this a joke? My demands are simple: 1. Provide a BRAND NEW battery replacement instead of a refurbished battery. 2. Offer a fair replacement/exchange value for the vehicle. This has been the worst ownership experience of my life. Extremely disappointed with Tata Motors and their after-sales service. TATA.ev Nitin Gadkari Department of Transport Tata Motors_Cars
0:13

Hello Tata Motors I purchased a Tata Nexon EV (30 kWh battery pack) on 10 February 2024 for around ₹18 Lakhs. Tata claimed a range of 325 KM, but throughout my ownership I NEVER received more than 175 KM on a full charge. Now the condition has become even worse. My battery drains so fast that I can barely drive 90 KM per charge. After reporting this issue, even the service center admitted there is a battery problem. At the time of purchase, Tata Motors clearly promised an 8-year / 160,000 KM battery warranty and assured us that defective batteries would be replaced with NEW ones. But now, when the issue has actually occurred, they are trying to replace my battery with a REFURBISHED (second-hand) battery instead of a new one. I raised this issue in February 2026. It has been months, and despite continuous follow-ups, there is still no battery replacement and no proper response from Tata Motors. What is more shocking is that Tata keeps blaming driving habits for the poor range. But according to THEIR OWN meter, my average consumption over the last 6434 KM is 91 Wh/KM, which technically should deliver around 329 KM range. Yet in reality, I never received anything close to that. To make things worse, the car makes frightening noises while charging. Honestly, it feels unsafe and scary, as if something could go seriously wrong at any moment. And when I asked Tata about exchanging this problematic vehicle, they offered only ₹5 Lakhs for a well-maintained 1.5-year-old car purchased for ₹18 Lakhs. Is this a joke? My demands are simple: 1. Provide a BRAND NEW battery replacement instead of a refurbished battery. 2. Offer a fair replacement/exchange value for the vehicle. This has been the worst ownership experience of my life. Extremely disappointed with Tata Motors and their after-sales service. TATA.ev Nitin Gadkari Department of Transport Tata Motors_Cars

Nikhil Dadhich (Vishweshwar Suntwal)

143,201 views • 2 months ago

❗️🇺🇦🇸🇪 The first Gripen C/D fighter jets are scheduled to be delivered to Ukraine in December-January. Although the C/D versions are technically inferior to the newer E model — primarily due to the absence of an AESA radar — they have undergone significant modernization between 2014 and 2016. These aircraft are capable of carrying and launching Meteor long-range air-to-air missiles. The missiles can be fired in silent mode, with mid-course guidance updates provided by Swedish Saab 340 AEW&C airborne early warning and control aircraft, which are also expected to be transferred to Ukraine in the near future. This combination will create a serious threat to Russian Su-34 fighter-bombers and Su-35 fighters, which are currently actively using guided aerial bombs from beyond the reach of Ukrainian air defenses. The integration of Gripen C/D fighters with Meteor missiles and Saab 340 AWACS aircraft represents a highly effective and relatively rapid solution for Ukraine. This system will allow Ukrainian forces to challenge Russian aviation in the operational-tactical depth, potentially forcing Russian aircraft to operate much farther from the front line and significantly reducing the effectiveness of their glide bomb attacks. Video is generated by grok AI
0:10

❗️🇺🇦🇸🇪 The first Gripen C/D fighter jets are scheduled to be delivered to Ukraine in December-January. Although the C/D versions are technically inferior to the newer E model — primarily due to the absence of an AESA radar — they have undergone significant modernization between 2014 and 2016. These aircraft are capable of carrying and launching Meteor long-range air-to-air missiles. The missiles can be fired in silent mode, with mid-course guidance updates provided by Swedish Saab 340 AEW&C airborne early warning and control aircraft, which are also expected to be transferred to Ukraine in the near future. This combination will create a serious threat to Russian Su-34 fighter-bombers and Su-35 fighters, which are currently actively using guided aerial bombs from beyond the reach of Ukrainian air defenses. The integration of Gripen C/D fighters with Meteor missiles and Saab 340 AWACS aircraft represents a highly effective and relatively rapid solution for Ukraine. This system will allow Ukrainian forces to challenge Russian aviation in the operational-tactical depth, potentially forcing Russian aircraft to operate much farther from the front line and significantly reducing the effectiveness of their glide bomb attacks. Video is generated by grok AI

NSTRIKE

26,422 views • 2 months ago

🚨 CATL SAYS LITHIUM-AIR BATTERIES COULD ONE DAY DELIVER 1600+ KM RANGE WITH ENERGY DENSITY APPROACHING PETROL. The world’s largest battery maker is pushing a radical “breathing” battery technology that replaces heavy nickel, cobalt and manganese with lithium metal and oxygen pulled directly from the air. In early lab tests, researchers have already achieved around 1,200 Wh/kg more than four times today’s best lithium-ion cells. With further development, CATL believes the technology could theoretically reach ~12,000 Wh/kg, close to the energy density of petrol itself. Why this matters: • It could slash battery weight and cost dramatically • Small EVs might achieve 1,600+ km of real-world range • It removes dependence on scarce metals like nickel and cobalt • A 1,000-cycle prototype with 1,600 km range would theoretically last 1.6 million kilometres The deeper implication: Lithium-air represents one of the few battery chemistries that could genuinely match or exceed the convenience of petrol without massive compromises. If the enormous technical hurdles (moisture sensitivity, cycle life, and oxygen management) can be solved, it wouldn’t just improve EVs it could fundamentally change what’s possible for electric aviation, long-haul transport, and portable power. We’re still very early. Current prototypes are far from commercial, and most experts expect mass production only after 2030 at the earliest. But the fact that the company producing over half the world’s high-voltage batteries is seriously pursuing this shows how transformative the payoff could be. Would you rather see solid-state batteries win the next decade, or do you think lithium-air could leapfrog them entirely? Follow for more frontier battery technology and energy breakthroughs.
0:10

🚨 CATL SAYS LITHIUM-AIR BATTERIES COULD ONE DAY DELIVER 1600+ KM RANGE WITH ENERGY DENSITY APPROACHING PETROL. The world’s largest battery maker is pushing a radical “breathing” battery technology that replaces heavy nickel, cobalt and manganese with lithium metal and oxygen pulled directly from the air. In early lab tests, researchers have already achieved around 1,200 Wh/kg more than four times today’s best lithium-ion cells. With further development, CATL believes the technology could theoretically reach ~12,000 Wh/kg, close to the energy density of petrol itself. Why this matters: • It could slash battery weight and cost dramatically • Small EVs might achieve 1,600+ km of real-world range • It removes dependence on scarce metals like nickel and cobalt • A 1,000-cycle prototype with 1,600 km range would theoretically last 1.6 million kilometres The deeper implication: Lithium-air represents one of the few battery chemistries that could genuinely match or exceed the convenience of petrol without massive compromises. If the enormous technical hurdles (moisture sensitivity, cycle life, and oxygen management) can be solved, it wouldn’t just improve EVs it could fundamentally change what’s possible for electric aviation, long-haul transport, and portable power. We’re still very early. Current prototypes are far from commercial, and most experts expect mass production only after 2030 at the earliest. But the fact that the company producing over half the world’s high-voltage batteries is seriously pursuing this shows how transformative the payoff could be. Would you rather see solid-state batteries win the next decade, or do you think lithium-air could leapfrog them entirely? Follow for more frontier battery technology and energy breakthroughs.

TheNewPhysics

17,944 views • 1 month ago

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA SENDS A-50U FLYING RADAR TO HUNT UKRAINIAN CRUISE MISSILES Russia has rushed its rare upgraded A-50U 'flying radar' — the most powerful airborne system in its inventory — into action to smash Ukrainian FP-5 Flamingo cruise missile barrages targeting the critical Votkinsk plant that manufactures Iskander-M ballistic missiles. So what upgrades and operational roles give the A-50U its edge against low-flying cruise missiles? 🔸 Russia's A-50U, an enhanced Soviet-era platform incorporating technologies from the delayed A-100 program, detects terrain-hugging Flamingo cruise missiles 10-30 minutes earlier than ground radars while filling coverage gaps over rivers and terrain 🔸 The A-50U tracks up to 300 objects and supplies targeting data to 40 fighters (baseline A-50: 200/20), with its Shmel II radar delivering 33% longer tracking range against fighters. 🔸 Each A-50U provides 15-20% higher endurance for over 9 hours airborne without refueling and functions as a central command-and-control node for Russia's multi-tier air defense networks. 🔸 An A-50U took off around 00:40 on July 5 to support intercepts after more than five Flamingo missiles flew the Volga route via Volgograd toward Votkinsk in Udmurtia on June 5, with no impacts reported. 🔸 The A-50U previously guided S-400 40N6 shots near 400 km at low altitude and Su-35/R-37 engagements out to 350 km, as Ukraine shifts from restricted Anglo-French Storm Shadow/SCALP to mass unrestricted FP-5 production. Can Ukraine’s cruise missiles survive Russia’s A-50U flying radar coverage?
0:15

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA SENDS A-50U FLYING RADAR TO HUNT UKRAINIAN CRUISE MISSILES Russia has rushed its rare upgraded A-50U 'flying radar' — the most powerful airborne system in its inventory — into action to smash Ukrainian FP-5 Flamingo cruise missile barrages targeting the critical Votkinsk plant that manufactures Iskander-M ballistic missiles. So what upgrades and operational roles give the A-50U its edge against low-flying cruise missiles? 🔸 Russia's A-50U, an enhanced Soviet-era platform incorporating technologies from the delayed A-100 program, detects terrain-hugging Flamingo cruise missiles 10-30 minutes earlier than ground radars while filling coverage gaps over rivers and terrain 🔸 The A-50U tracks up to 300 objects and supplies targeting data to 40 fighters (baseline A-50: 200/20), with its Shmel II radar delivering 33% longer tracking range against fighters. 🔸 Each A-50U provides 15-20% higher endurance for over 9 hours airborne without refueling and functions as a central command-and-control node for Russia's multi-tier air defense networks. 🔸 An A-50U took off around 00:40 on July 5 to support intercepts after more than five Flamingo missiles flew the Volga route via Volgograd toward Votkinsk in Udmurtia on June 5, with no impacts reported. 🔸 The A-50U previously guided S-400 40N6 shots near 400 km at low altitude and Su-35/R-37 engagements out to 350 km, as Ukraine shifts from restricted Anglo-French Storm Shadow/SCALP to mass unrestricted FP-5 production. Can Ukraine’s cruise missiles survive Russia’s A-50U flying radar coverage?

NewRulesGeopolitics

28,622 views • 26 days ago

‼️🇺🇸 RQ-4 GLOBAL HAWK | U.S. STRATEGIC RECONNAISSANCE DRONE🔥 The RQ-4 Global Hawk is a high altitude long endurance unmanned aerial vehicle operated by the United States Air Force and Navy. It is designed for one mission only intelligence dominance. Range: Over 22,000 km in a single mission, enabling intercontinental surveillance without refueling. Endurance Capable of flying 30 to 34 hours continuously, providing persistent coverage day and night. Operating Altitude: Approximately 60,000 feet, beyond the reach of most air defense systems. Capabilities: Equipped with advanced ISR sensors including • Synthetic Aperture Radar • Electro optical imaging • Infrared surveillance It can monitor troop movements, naval activity, missile sites, air defense networks, and battlefield changes in real time. Weapons: Global Hawk carries no missiles or bombs. It is a reconnaissance only platform. Strike Accuracy Role: While it does not conduct strikes, the targeting intelligence it delivers enables U.S. aircraft and precision weapons to hit targets with extreme accuracy. Core Mission: Strategic surveillance Missile launch detection Air defense mapping Maritime and border monitoring Global Hawk does not attack. It decides what gets attacked next.
0:15

‼️🇺🇸 RQ-4 GLOBAL HAWK | U.S. STRATEGIC RECONNAISSANCE DRONE🔥 The RQ-4 Global Hawk is a high altitude long endurance unmanned aerial vehicle operated by the United States Air Force and Navy. It is designed for one mission only intelligence dominance. Range: Over 22,000 km in a single mission, enabling intercontinental surveillance without refueling. Endurance Capable of flying 30 to 34 hours continuously, providing persistent coverage day and night. Operating Altitude: Approximately 60,000 feet, beyond the reach of most air defense systems. Capabilities: Equipped with advanced ISR sensors including • Synthetic Aperture Radar • Electro optical imaging • Infrared surveillance It can monitor troop movements, naval activity, missile sites, air defense networks, and battlefield changes in real time. Weapons: Global Hawk carries no missiles or bombs. It is a reconnaissance only platform. Strike Accuracy Role: While it does not conduct strikes, the targeting intelligence it delivers enables U.S. aircraft and precision weapons to hit targets with extreme accuracy. Core Mission: Strategic surveillance Missile launch detection Air defense mapping Maritime and border monitoring Global Hawk does not attack. It decides what gets attacked next.

Defense Intelligence

32,892 views • 7 months ago

How Ukraine reached parity with Russia in long-range capabilities Analysts from the Back And Alive Foundation analyzed Ukraine's transition from local frontline strikes to the systemic employment of long-range drones. The volume of drones Ukraine has launched has surged from 110 units in January 2024 to over 7,000 in March 2026. Throughout 2025, Ukraine increased our launch frequency fivefold. In March 2026, Ukraine even managed to surpass the Russia in the number of launched and recorded drones. Flight Geography and Extreme Ranges 🔹Ukrainian drones are increasingly detected at facilities located hundreds and thousands of kilometers from the frontline. The number of Russian regions where they are spotted is steadily growing. 🔹This evolution is not just about quantity, but also about a significant increase in operational range. For instance, in February 2026, an oil refinery in the city of Ukhta (Komi Republic) was struck—over 1,800 km from the Ukrainian border. A Nightmare for Russian Air Defense 🔹As Ukraine deploys more drones, Russian air defense forces must track and intercept a vastly higher number of simultaneous targets, leading to system saturation. 🔹The Russian military is forced to make a choice: protect assets near the frontline to cover their troops, or deploy systems deep into the interior to defend industrial and energy infrastructure. Given Russia’s vast landmass, it is physically impossible to cover all critical sites with limited resources. 🔹Furthermore, the Defense Forces of Ukraine continue to degrade Russian air defense capabilities. Over the past year, open-source intelligence (OSINT) has confirmed 172 hits on Russian air defense systems through video footage; however, the actual number of successful strikes is significantly higher. 📹📈Cumulative number of days on which at least one UAV reached the region (from January 2024 to March 2026).
0:10

How Ukraine reached parity with Russia in long-range capabilities Analysts from the Back And Alive Foundation analyzed Ukraine's transition from local frontline strikes to the systemic employment of long-range drones. The volume of drones Ukraine has launched has surged from 110 units in January 2024 to over 7,000 in March 2026. Throughout 2025, Ukraine increased our launch frequency fivefold. In March 2026, Ukraine even managed to surpass the Russia in the number of launched and recorded drones. Flight Geography and Extreme Ranges 🔹Ukrainian drones are increasingly detected at facilities located hundreds and thousands of kilometers from the frontline. The number of Russian regions where they are spotted is steadily growing. 🔹This evolution is not just about quantity, but also about a significant increase in operational range. For instance, in February 2026, an oil refinery in the city of Ukhta (Komi Republic) was struck—over 1,800 km from the Ukrainian border. A Nightmare for Russian Air Defense 🔹As Ukraine deploys more drones, Russian air defense forces must track and intercept a vastly higher number of simultaneous targets, leading to system saturation. 🔹The Russian military is forced to make a choice: protect assets near the frontline to cover their troops, or deploy systems deep into the interior to defend industrial and energy infrastructure. Given Russia’s vast landmass, it is physically impossible to cover all critical sites with limited resources. 🔹Furthermore, the Defense Forces of Ukraine continue to degrade Russian air defense capabilities. Over the past year, open-source intelligence (OSINT) has confirmed 172 hits on Russian air defense systems through video footage; however, the actual number of successful strikes is significantly higher. 📹📈Cumulative number of days on which at least one UAV reached the region (from January 2024 to March 2026).

Anton Gerashchenko

51,874 views • 3 months ago

He is completely on point and I honestly can’t understand the hysteria and the competing narratives. Guys, it’s a Potemkin village, I dare you to venture a few kms outside!!! The reality is that Moscow is the largest city in Europe with 20 million people based on official numbers. The city is full of beautiful, well preserved historical sites, has modern infrastructure and services, it’s easy to get around, it’s clean and it’s safe. Moscow’s Crime Index ~35.2 (very low among major cities). For comparison, Paris: ~58.0, London: ~55.6, Washington, D.C.: I~59.8, New York City: ~51.1, Toronto: Crime Index ~43.5. The people making the loudest noise either swallowed the decades long propaganda without ever having stepped foot there themselves or are gleefully remembering the lawless shit hole it was devolving into in the 90s. I’ve been to Moscow 7 times since 2007, with the most recent visit 2 years ago. It’s an amazing city whether you like the politics or not. As for venturing out beyond the shiny capital and SPB, most large and largish cities have seen tremendous improvements with progress being made elsewhere as well. Russia is 17,098,246 km², no one in their right mind is saying that all inhabited areas are an idyllic utopia. They aren’t. Some far from it. There is disparity and places that still resemble those gray Soviet memoryscapes. The same people making the most noise should however be honest and look around their own backyard and let everyone know what they see when they step out of their country’s postcard collection.
0:24

He is completely on point and I honestly can’t understand the hysteria and the competing narratives. Guys, it’s a Potemkin village, I dare you to venture a few kms outside!!! The reality is that Moscow is the largest city in Europe with 20 million people based on official numbers. The city is full of beautiful, well preserved historical sites, has modern infrastructure and services, it’s easy to get around, it’s clean and it’s safe. Moscow’s Crime Index ~35.2 (very low among major cities). For comparison, Paris: ~58.0, London: ~55.6, Washington, D.C.: I~59.8, New York City: ~51.1, Toronto: Crime Index ~43.5. The people making the loudest noise either swallowed the decades long propaganda without ever having stepped foot there themselves or are gleefully remembering the lawless shit hole it was devolving into in the 90s. I’ve been to Moscow 7 times since 2007, with the most recent visit 2 years ago. It’s an amazing city whether you like the politics or not. As for venturing out beyond the shiny capital and SPB, most large and largish cities have seen tremendous improvements with progress being made elsewhere as well. Russia is 17,098,246 km², no one in their right mind is saying that all inhabited areas are an idyllic utopia. They aren’t. Some far from it. There is disparity and places that still resemble those gray Soviet memoryscapes. The same people making the most noise should however be honest and look around their own backyard and let everyone know what they see when they step out of their country’s postcard collection.

Anatomy of Truth 🇨🇦

36,555 views • 2 months ago