Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

‼️‼️🇷🇺☢️ BREAKING | Russian state television is once again normalizing nuclear blackmail, with propagandists openly discussing demonstrative nuclear use and even the possibility of escalating to a real strike against the United Kingdom if the West refuses to back down. During the discussion, one speaker argued that Russia should...

visionergeo's profile picture

Visioner

226,622 subscribers

20,292 просмотров • 11 часов назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇷🇺☢️🇺🇦 Concern inside Russia’s own establishment over the possibility that Vladimir Putin could resort to a tactical nuclear weapon is reportedly growing, as the Kremlin searches for ways to change the trajectory of the war. According to Bloomberg, an increasing number of Russian officials and people familiar with discussions inside the Kremlin believe the possibility of Putin considering tactical nuclear use can no longer be completely dismissed. The concern reflects the enormous military and political stakes Moscow now faces in Ukraine and the growing uncertainty surrounding how far the Kremlin could escalate if conventional options fail to deliver its objectives. Russia’s key international partners are also deeply opposed to such a scenario. China and India have warned Moscow against nuclear escalation, with Beijing repeatedly communicating that Russia should not even consider employing nuclear weapons against Ukraine. China has continued publicly emphasizing its opposition to nuclear use and escalation. The political consequences for Moscow would be enormous. Crossing the nuclear threshold would risk destroying much of the diplomatic space Russia still retains with countries such as China and India, while radically escalating its confrontation with Ukraine and the West. That helps explain why pressure from Beijing and New Delhi matters: for Putin, nuclear escalation would not simply represent another military step, but potentially a fundamental rupture with partners Russia increasingly depends upon.
0:23

🇷🇺☢️🇺🇦 Concern inside Russia’s own establishment over the possibility that Vladimir Putin could resort to a tactical nuclear weapon is reportedly growing, as the Kremlin searches for ways to change the trajectory of the war. According to Bloomberg, an increasing number of Russian officials and people familiar with discussions inside the Kremlin believe the possibility of Putin considering tactical nuclear use can no longer be completely dismissed. The concern reflects the enormous military and political stakes Moscow now faces in Ukraine and the growing uncertainty surrounding how far the Kremlin could escalate if conventional options fail to deliver its objectives. Russia’s key international partners are also deeply opposed to such a scenario. China and India have warned Moscow against nuclear escalation, with Beijing repeatedly communicating that Russia should not even consider employing nuclear weapons against Ukraine. China has continued publicly emphasizing its opposition to nuclear use and escalation. The political consequences for Moscow would be enormous. Crossing the nuclear threshold would risk destroying much of the diplomatic space Russia still retains with countries such as China and India, while radically escalating its confrontation with Ukraine and the West. That helps explain why pressure from Beijing and New Delhi matters: for Putin, nuclear escalation would not simply represent another military step, but potentially a fundamental rupture with partners Russia increasingly depends upon.

NSTRIKE

56,879 просмотров • 4 дней назад

🚨 NUCLEAR ALERT — Russian state TV: “To stop Europe we will need to use nuclear weapons” Russian state television talk shows said a conventional war with Europe is not feasible and that nuclear weapons would be required. On Channel One’s “Vremya Pokazhet,” National Energy Security Fund director Konstantin Simonov reportedly said Europe outmatches Russia demographically, technologically and economically, adding: “We cannot wage a conventional war with it. To stop Europe we will need to use nuclear weapons.” Similar nuclear rhetoric circulated on Russia-1 alongside a United Kingdom map graphic. The timing comes amid CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s visit to Moscow and reports, citing sources close to the Kremlin, of renewed discussion of tactical nuclear options. Particularly notable: the same propaganda line on 24 February 2022 claimed Kyiv would fall in three days as the “SVO” began.
1:30

🚨 NUCLEAR ALERT — Russian state TV: “To stop Europe we will need to use nuclear weapons” Russian state television talk shows said a conventional war with Europe is not feasible and that nuclear weapons would be required. On Channel One’s “Vremya Pokazhet,” National Energy Security Fund director Konstantin Simonov reportedly said Europe outmatches Russia demographically, technologically and economically, adding: “We cannot wage a conventional war with it. To stop Europe we will need to use nuclear weapons.” Similar nuclear rhetoric circulated on Russia-1 alongside a United Kingdom map graphic. The timing comes amid CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s visit to Moscow and reports, citing sources close to the Kremlin, of renewed discussion of tactical nuclear options. Particularly notable: the same propaganda line on 24 February 2022 claimed Kyiv would fall in three days as the “SVO” began.

Intelligence FRONT

24,436 просмотров • 1 день назад

🚨 RUSSIA’S NUCLEAR THRESHOLD IS SHIFTING. Prof John Mearsheimer [John Mearsheimer] warns that Moscow will no longer allow the West to "use Ukraine as a battering ram against Russia." Strategists are now floating a terrifying escalation where "countries in Europe that support the Ukrainians should be struck with conventional weapons"—even NATO members. If conventional strikes fail, Mearsheimer notes that "a limited use of nuclear weapons is called for" to halt Western aid. The goal is "largely for demonstrative purposes" to signal that Russia will not tolerate further intervention. This is a high-stakes gamble to force the West to stop its U.S. strategy of attrition before a total collapse occurs. The window for a diplomatic exit is closing as the Russia-Ukraine war enters its most dangerous phase. 📺 Watch the full, shocking analysis here: 👉 #RussiaUkraineWar #NuclearEscalation #NATO #Mearsheimer #Geopolitics #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity #GlobalConflict #Europe #StrategicDefense #USStrategy
1:43

🚨 RUSSIA’S NUCLEAR THRESHOLD IS SHIFTING. Prof John Mearsheimer [John Mearsheimer] warns that Moscow will no longer allow the West to "use Ukraine as a battering ram against Russia." Strategists are now floating a terrifying escalation where "countries in Europe that support the Ukrainians should be struck with conventional weapons"—even NATO members. If conventional strikes fail, Mearsheimer notes that "a limited use of nuclear weapons is called for" to halt Western aid. The goal is "largely for demonstrative purposes" to signal that Russia will not tolerate further intervention. This is a high-stakes gamble to force the West to stop its U.S. strategy of attrition before a total collapse occurs. The window for a diplomatic exit is closing as the Russia-Ukraine war enters its most dangerous phase. 📺 Watch the full, shocking analysis here: 👉 #RussiaUkraineWar #NuclearEscalation #NATO #Mearsheimer #Geopolitics #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity #GlobalConflict #Europe #StrategicDefense #USStrategy

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

61,025 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

⚡️BREAKING: President Putin introduced the amendments of Russia’s nuclear doctrine under which: ☢️Aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state, will be perceived as their joint attack on the Russian Federation. ☢️Russia will consider the possibility of usage nuclear weapon after receiving reliable information about the massive launch of means of aerospace attack, including strategic or tactical aircraft, cruise missiles, drones, hypersonic and other aircraft. ☢️Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Belarus, as a part of the Union state.
1:09

⚡️BREAKING: President Putin introduced the amendments of Russia’s nuclear doctrine under which: ☢️Aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state, will be perceived as their joint attack on the Russian Federation. ☢️Russia will consider the possibility of usage nuclear weapon after receiving reliable information about the massive launch of means of aerospace attack, including strategic or tactical aircraft, cruise missiles, drones, hypersonic and other aircraft. ☢️Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Belarus, as a part of the Union state.

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

121,108 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?
0:57

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?

Mario Nawfal

10,996,786 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 NUCLEAR ESCALATION ALERT: Russia Threatens Tactical Nukes Over Claim that UK/France Nuclear Plan to Transfer Nuke Materials to Ukraine 🚨 Former CIA Analyst Larry Johnson warns we're foolishly entering the dangerous territory of conscious nuclear escalation in the latest Daniel Davis Deep Dive: "Russia had previously...vowed that if (the West provided nuclear materials to Ukraine), that Russia would then reserve the right to retaliate against the countries that facilitated that. That means retaliating against the UK and the United States, number one." "They may already be prepared to use the Oreshnik against a factory in the UK." "So this is now escalating towards a (potential) nuclear war." Amid fresh Russian claims (denied by West as disinformation), this could trigger catastrophic retaliation. If the claim is merely Russian disinformation, then it will remain a danger in rhetoric only. If the West actually *is* contemplating such a foolish action, we could be in real trouble - hopefully the claims aren't true. Watch the full clip & episode NOW: Russia Could Use Nukes if UK & France Give Ukraine Atomic Weapons 👇 [ 👉#NuclearWar #Ukraine #Russia #NuclearWeapons #UKFrance #LarryJohnson #DeepDive
1:21

🚨 NUCLEAR ESCALATION ALERT: Russia Threatens Tactical Nukes Over Claim that UK/France Nuclear Plan to Transfer Nuke Materials to Ukraine 🚨 Former CIA Analyst Larry Johnson warns we're foolishly entering the dangerous territory of conscious nuclear escalation in the latest Daniel Davis Deep Dive: "Russia had previously...vowed that if (the West provided nuclear materials to Ukraine), that Russia would then reserve the right to retaliate against the countries that facilitated that. That means retaliating against the UK and the United States, number one." "They may already be prepared to use the Oreshnik against a factory in the UK." "So this is now escalating towards a (potential) nuclear war." Amid fresh Russian claims (denied by West as disinformation), this could trigger catastrophic retaliation. If the claim is merely Russian disinformation, then it will remain a danger in rhetoric only. If the West actually *is* contemplating such a foolish action, we could be in real trouble - hopefully the claims aren't true. Watch the full clip & episode NOW: Russia Could Use Nukes if UK & France Give Ukraine Atomic Weapons 👇 [ 👉#NuclearWar #Ukraine #Russia #NuclearWeapons #UKFrance #LarryJohnson #DeepDive

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

10,684 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi
1:48

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi

Mario Nawfal

85,233 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨INTERVIEW: “CHINA'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS RISING, BUT IT’S NOT THERE YET” “China, thanks to whose support the Russian economy is still functioning, and Russia is able to conduct this war, is also not ready for international politics going nuclear. China is a world economic superpower, the largest economy in the world. But it is a mid-power when it comes to nuclear arsenal. China is now the most dynamic nuclear power in terms of developing its nuclear and increasing its nuclear arsenal and its nuclear capabilities. But it is not there yet. China's nuclear arsenal is roughly 10% of what Russia and the United States have in terms of the warheads.” Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.
4:26

🚨INTERVIEW: “CHINA'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS RISING, BUT IT’S NOT THERE YET” “China, thanks to whose support the Russian economy is still functioning, and Russia is able to conduct this war, is also not ready for international politics going nuclear. China is a world economic superpower, the largest economy in the world. But it is a mid-power when it comes to nuclear arsenal. China is now the most dynamic nuclear power in terms of developing its nuclear and increasing its nuclear arsenal and its nuclear capabilities. But it is not there yet. China's nuclear arsenal is roughly 10% of what Russia and the United States have in terms of the warheads.” Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

Mario Nawfal

19,076 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

There have been recent reports and warnings from Russian officials and allies of President Putin indicating that Russia is prepared to use nuclear weapons against the UK and Germany if the conflict in Ukraine continues. A top Putin advisor has reportedly stated that Russia may eliminate these countries with nuclear strikes as part of its strategic threats. These statements reflect heightened tensions and nuclear rhetoric amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.
14:12

There have been recent reports and warnings from Russian officials and allies of President Putin indicating that Russia is prepared to use nuclear weapons against the UK and Germany if the conflict in Ukraine continues. A top Putin advisor has reportedly stated that Russia may eliminate these countries with nuclear strikes as part of its strategic threats. These statements reflect heightened tensions and nuclear rhetoric amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

119,533 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Putin claims “the West is openly preparing for war with Russia.” This from the man who launched the largest war in Europe since 1945, invaded a neighbouring country, illegally annexed territory, threatened nuclear escalation, and spends every day accusing others of what he is doing himself. There is only one country routinely firing nuclear-capable missiles in Europe and warning of nuclear Armageddon whenever events do not go its way. That country is Russia.
1:57

Putin claims “the West is openly preparing for war with Russia.” This from the man who launched the largest war in Europe since 1945, invaded a neighbouring country, illegally annexed territory, threatened nuclear escalation, and spends every day accusing others of what he is doing himself. There is only one country routinely firing nuclear-capable missiles in Europe and warning of nuclear Armageddon whenever events do not go its way. That country is Russia.

Shaun Pinner

57,318 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

BOMBSHELL.🚨 The New York Times buries in a report that the Biden administration is considering the return of Nuclear Weapons to Ukraine. "So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire. Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications." The nuclear brinksmanship is being framed as an act of "deterrence," but it would drastically escalate the conflict. Moscow is sure to consider such an action as a betrayal of Post-Soviet agreements and a direct provocation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently lowered the threshold for using nuclear weapons; a major attack on Russia with conventional missiles, drones or aircraft could trigger a nuclear response. The Biden administration can't leave office soon enough.
0:29

BOMBSHELL.🚨 The New York Times buries in a report that the Biden administration is considering the return of Nuclear Weapons to Ukraine. "So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire. Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications." The nuclear brinksmanship is being framed as an act of "deterrence," but it would drastically escalate the conflict. Moscow is sure to consider such an action as a betrayal of Post-Soviet agreements and a direct provocation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently lowered the threshold for using nuclear weapons; a major attack on Russia with conventional missiles, drones or aircraft could trigger a nuclear response. The Biden administration can't leave office soon enough.

Kyle Becker

385,090 просмотров • 1 год назад

We need to stop this utter nonsense about fighting Russia. First, Russia is not an enemy and won't be attacking Europe, and second, Russia is a nuclear power. Who in their right mind thinks that if Russia was at risk of losing a conventional war that it wouldn't use its nuclear arsenal? It's only Putins' cool head that's stopping Russia from retaliating against NATO aggression and lobbing a couple of low-grade nuclear weapons at Europe right now. NATO assisting Ukraine to violate Russian territory would have been unthinkable during the Cold War. Wise up, people...
2:34

We need to stop this utter nonsense about fighting Russia. First, Russia is not an enemy and won't be attacking Europe, and second, Russia is a nuclear power. Who in their right mind thinks that if Russia was at risk of losing a conventional war that it wouldn't use its nuclear arsenal? It's only Putins' cool head that's stopping Russia from retaliating against NATO aggression and lobbing a couple of low-grade nuclear weapons at Europe right now. NATO assisting Ukraine to violate Russian territory would have been unthinkable during the Cold War. Wise up, people...

Kerry Burgess

32,806 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

To commemorate four years of its failed conventional war, Russia is getting ready for a nuclear one. “Russia will use the full range of both tactical and strategic nuclear forces against France, Great Britain, and Ukraine.” — Igor Korotchenko, Russian journalist and military analyst
2:26

To commemorate four years of its failed conventional war, Russia is getting ready for a nuclear one. “Russia will use the full range of both tactical and strategic nuclear forces against France, Great Britain, and Ukraine.” — Igor Korotchenko, Russian journalist and military analyst

Natalka

18,661 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"Tomahawks are capable, and at some points were primarily designed to be strategic weapons—that is, to carry nuclear warheads. And if a Tomahawk is hurtling towards Moscow, Russia will probably not be able to discern in flight whether that is a nuclear warhead..." Mark Sleboda noted that if the US moves forward with Trump's threats to use long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles in the proxy war against Russia, it could spark a nuclear conflict.
1:00

"Tomahawks are capable, and at some points were primarily designed to be strategic weapons—that is, to carry nuclear warheads. And if a Tomahawk is hurtling towards Moscow, Russia will probably not be able to discern in flight whether that is a nuclear warhead..." Mark Sleboda noted that if the US moves forward with Trump's threats to use long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles in the proxy war against Russia, it could spark a nuclear conflict.

Rachel Blevins

38,215 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

☢️☢️☢️ Nuclear war In the event of a nuclear conflict between Russia and NATO, it is estimated that 98-99% of the population in the US, EU, Russia, and China would perish. This thought-provoking video sheds light on the utter futility of engaging in a nuclear conflict that would devastate the entire northern hemisphere. The goal is to instill a deep sense of fear regarding the consequences of a nuclear war and cultivate a strong desire for negotiation. It's evident that any alternative to the death of 99% of the northern hemisphere's population would be preferable.
3:31

☢️☢️☢️ Nuclear war In the event of a nuclear conflict between Russia and NATO, it is estimated that 98-99% of the population in the US, EU, Russia, and China would perish. This thought-provoking video sheds light on the utter futility of engaging in a nuclear conflict that would devastate the entire northern hemisphere. The goal is to instill a deep sense of fear regarding the consequences of a nuclear war and cultivate a strong desire for negotiation. It's evident that any alternative to the death of 99% of the northern hemisphere's population would be preferable.

Russian Market

331,271 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Ukraine is just NOT that Important. John Mearsheimer: We're talking about NATO getting involved in a war, and NATO's in no position to win a war against the Russians, number one. Number two, the last thing the United States wants, given that we're up to our eyeballs Middle East, plus we have to worry about containing is a war, in Ukraine against Russia. And then most important of all, once you talk about the United States and Russia actually fighting each other, the threat of nuclear escalation, goes up greatly, and the last thing we want is a nuclear war over Ukraine because Ukraine is just not that important.
3:17

Ukraine is just NOT that Important. John Mearsheimer: We're talking about NATO getting involved in a war, and NATO's in no position to win a war against the Russians, number one. Number two, the last thing the United States wants, given that we're up to our eyeballs Middle East, plus we have to worry about containing is a war, in Ukraine against Russia. And then most important of all, once you talk about the United States and Russia actually fighting each other, the threat of nuclear escalation, goes up greatly, and the last thing we want is a nuclear war over Ukraine because Ukraine is just not that important.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

18,782 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

☢️ Russian state TV propagandist Vladimir Solovyov openly called for a tactical nuclear strike on Europe Solovyov — one of the Kremlin’s most aggressive media figures and a top Putin ally on Russian television — said Europe should “feel what war is like on their own miserable European skin.” He also claimed Russia should strike the “weak and pathetic scum” in Europe rather than the US. Solovyov is known for regularly threatening the West, NATO countries, and Ukraine with nuclear war live on state television.
0:30

☢️ Russian state TV propagandist Vladimir Solovyov openly called for a tactical nuclear strike on Europe Solovyov — one of the Kremlin’s most aggressive media figures and a top Putin ally on Russian television — said Europe should “feel what war is like on their own miserable European skin.” He also claimed Russia should strike the “weak and pathetic scum” in Europe rather than the US. Solovyov is known for regularly threatening the West, NATO countries, and Ukraine with nuclear war live on state television.

NEXTA

131,536 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: Iran is now claiming it could build a nuclear weapon in as little as 24 hours. Tehran has issued a stark warning to the West: any strike on its nuclear facilities will trigger severe retaliation. This is nuclear brinkmanship at its most dangerous. Whether the 24-hour claim is technical reality or strategic messaging, the signal is unmistakable — Iran wants the world to believe it is one step from the nuclear threshold. The Middle East is already on edge following military strikes and counter-threats. If escalation continues, the line between conventional war and nuclear confrontation could narrow very quickly. The world is watching.
2:20

🚨 BREAKING: Iran is now claiming it could build a nuclear weapon in as little as 24 hours. Tehran has issued a stark warning to the West: any strike on its nuclear facilities will trigger severe retaliation. This is nuclear brinkmanship at its most dangerous. Whether the 24-hour claim is technical reality or strategic messaging, the signal is unmistakable — Iran wants the world to believe it is one step from the nuclear threshold. The Middle East is already on edge following military strikes and counter-threats. If escalation continues, the line between conventional war and nuclear confrontation could narrow very quickly. The world is watching.

Jim Ferguson

2,222,475 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад