Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

#BREAKING: Smart Leah: “In this case (TPS)…the six Republican [SCOTUS] appointees said that Trump’s statements that Haitians probably have AIDS, are poisoning the blood of our country, are eating the cats and dogs, DON’T constitute racial animus. I mean, Justice Alito’s majority opinion characterized that as not overtly racial....

Emolclause's profile picture

Emoluments Clause

117,358 subscribers

55,454 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика#BREAKING
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

.Mollie explains how the Supreme Court's gerrymandering decision could transform the country by declaring ALL of the Democrats' race-based districts unconstitutional: “Alito wrote this masterful, major opinion, saying the Constitution forbids racism. The Voting Rights Act was not written and could not be written to oppose what the Constitution says. And so Section 2, which some people had interpreted as requiring racist maps, that's clearly not the meaning. The racism is ENDED. Democrats have exploited these federal rulings to create these very racial maps that have given them an undue advantage in certain states. So ruling these congressional districts as unconstitutional and contrary to the Voting Rights Act itself means they’ll all be going away.”
1:42

.Mollie explains how the Supreme Court's gerrymandering decision could transform the country by declaring ALL of the Democrats' race-based districts unconstitutional: “Alito wrote this masterful, major opinion, saying the Constitution forbids racism. The Voting Rights Act was not written and could not be written to oppose what the Constitution says. And so Section 2, which some people had interpreted as requiring racist maps, that's clearly not the meaning. The racism is ENDED. Democrats have exploited these federal rulings to create these very racial maps that have given them an undue advantage in certain states. So ruling these congressional districts as unconstitutional and contrary to the Voting Rights Act itself means they’ll all be going away.”

Glenn Beck

28,957 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Warner: The president continues said he was shocked that the Iranians had moved to take over the strait of hormuz. Gabbard: I'm not aware of those remarks Warner: What about the comments the president made that he was surprised that Iran struck the adjacent gulf states. Gabbard: I'm not aware of those remarks Warner: Did you did you brief the president that if he starts a war of choice, that the likely result would be that Iran would strike adjacent gulf nations and close the strait of hormuz. Gabbard: I have not and won't divulge internal conversations
1:28

Warner: The president continues said he was shocked that the Iranians had moved to take over the strait of hormuz. Gabbard: I'm not aware of those remarks Warner: What about the comments the president made that he was surprised that Iran struck the adjacent gulf states. Gabbard: I'm not aware of those remarks Warner: Did you did you brief the president that if he starts a war of choice, that the likely result would be that Iran would strike adjacent gulf nations and close the strait of hormuz. Gabbard: I have not and won't divulge internal conversations

Acyn

232,755 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Elon Musk dismantles the media’s dishonest attempt to portray him as a racist People say that you’re a racist. What is the motivation for doing that? Elon Musk: “My partner is half-Indian, and I have four children with her. One of them was named after a famous Indian physicist. So I would say I’m not racist And if you look at the people employed at my companies, we have senior executives of all races. I don’t think there’s any racism there If people are coming to a country with antithetical views, I am against that. I’m against rape and murder. I’m against the imposition of rules and laws that are contrary to what we’ve come to accept in the West. And I think it’s a crying shame that traditional media like you don’t recognize this”
1:34

Elon Musk dismantles the media’s dishonest attempt to portray him as a racist People say that you’re a racist. What is the motivation for doing that? Elon Musk: “My partner is half-Indian, and I have four children with her. One of them was named after a famous Indian physicist. So I would say I’m not racist And if you look at the people employed at my companies, we have senior executives of all races. I don’t think there’s any racism there If people are coming to a country with antithetical views, I am against that. I’m against rape and murder. I’m against the imposition of rules and laws that are contrary to what we’ve come to accept in the West. And I think it’s a crying shame that traditional media like you don’t recognize this”

X Freeze

24,587 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 ILHAN OMAR: TRUMP IS RACIST, WE ARE NOT GOING ANYWHERE Omar accused Trump of targeting Black and Muslim immigrant communities, arguing his rhetoric and policies are consistent with what she described as a long record of racism, xenophobia, and Islamophobia. Omar framed the issue as both racial and religious, saying the focus on Somali and Muslim communities in Minnesota was deliberate, not incidental. She pushed back on the idea that these communities are outsiders, emphasizing that many are U.S. citizens who chose Minnesota as home because of its culture and people. Omar said criticism from the White House would not change that reality or force anyone to leave. “He has always been a racist, a bigot, xenophobic, and Islamophobic… it is not surprising that he is going after Black immigrants, especially a Black immigrant community that is also Muslim. Most of us are citizens. Our passports say we are nationals of this country. We chose Minnesota because it welcomed us, and we are going to be here regardless of what the president has to say.” Source: Simon Ateba
1:00

🇺🇸 ILHAN OMAR: TRUMP IS RACIST, WE ARE NOT GOING ANYWHERE Omar accused Trump of targeting Black and Muslim immigrant communities, arguing his rhetoric and policies are consistent with what she described as a long record of racism, xenophobia, and Islamophobia. Omar framed the issue as both racial and religious, saying the focus on Somali and Muslim communities in Minnesota was deliberate, not incidental. She pushed back on the idea that these communities are outsiders, emphasizing that many are U.S. citizens who chose Minnesota as home because of its culture and people. Omar said criticism from the White House would not change that reality or force anyone to leave. “He has always been a racist, a bigot, xenophobic, and Islamophobic… it is not surprising that he is going after Black immigrants, especially a Black immigrant community that is also Muslim. Most of us are citizens. Our passports say we are nationals of this country. We chose Minnesota because it welcomed us, and we are going to be here regardless of what the president has to say.” Source: Simon Ateba

Mario Nawfal

38,127 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Jessica: To say this all started in 2014, the racism, let's revisit what Barack Obama's candidacy and presidency looked like. Gutfeld: You mean his eight years as president? How did that happen in a racist country? Jessica: I’m talking about the reaction to him being president. Gutfeld: People don’t have to like him and still not be racist.
2:25

Jessica: To say this all started in 2014, the racism, let's revisit what Barack Obama's candidacy and presidency looked like. Gutfeld: You mean his eight years as president? How did that happen in a racist country? Jessica: I’m talking about the reaction to him being president. Gutfeld: People don’t have to like him and still not be racist.

Acyn

112,312 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Reporter: In your opinion, is Iran in control of the strait of hormuz? You said earlier that the president chose mercy, but you yourself had said three weeks ago that we will give no quarter? Do you think that your comments may have put American troops at risk? Hegseth: No, I try to be nice up here, but you did listen to what I said, right?
2:11

Reporter: In your opinion, is Iran in control of the strait of hormuz? You said earlier that the president chose mercy, but you yourself had said three weeks ago that we will give no quarter? Do you think that your comments may have put American troops at risk? Hegseth: No, I try to be nice up here, but you did listen to what I said, right?

Acyn

23,117 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Dustin Poirier addresses the language he used during the airport incident: "Growing up where I grew up when I was a kid, speaking like that was a normal thing where I come from, with the people I grew up with. I don't talk like that, and my daughter's never really heard me talk like that. But just in the moment, drunk, I went back to those dark times, and, yeah, I apologize. I shouldn't have said what I said, and I didn't mean it in a racist way at all. But that doesn't matter. That's not something that should ever be said."
3:30

Dustin Poirier addresses the language he used during the airport incident: "Growing up where I grew up when I was a kid, speaking like that was a normal thing where I come from, with the people I grew up with. I don't talk like that, and my daughter's never really heard me talk like that. But just in the moment, drunk, I went back to those dark times, and, yeah, I apologize. I shouldn't have said what I said, and I didn't mean it in a racist way at all. But that doesn't matter. That's not something that should ever be said."

Ariel Helwani

161,737 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Kennedy: "You blamed those statements on Mr. Stephen Miller at the White House. Did you not?" Noem: "No, sir, I did not… I've never said that at all." Kennedy: "You said on the record, 'Everything I've done, I've done at the direction of the president and Stephen.'" Noem: "You read that in a news article with no sources." Kennedy: "Are you denying that you said that?" Noem: "Sir, I'm not going to speak to that situation…no one has heard me say that."
2:28

Sensitive content

Kennedy: "You blamed those statements on Mr. Stephen Miller at the White House. Did you not?" Noem: "No, sir, I did not… I've never said that at all." Kennedy: "You said on the record, 'Everything I've done, I've done at the direction of the president and Stephen.'" Noem: "You read that in a news article with no sources." Kennedy: "Are you denying that you said that?" Noem: "Sir, I'm not going to speak to that situation…no one has heard me say that."

The Bulwark

287,681 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Claiming that MPs and Ministers have more powers, President Anura Kumara Dissanayake said he expects that all Ministers will know the limits of their powers and act with accountability. Addressing the new Cabinet, he said most of the Ministers are new, not only to the Cabinet but to Parliament as well. The President said he was well aware that all of them are honest and not corrupt and that they have the courage to fulfil the aspirations of the people.
2:55

Claiming that MPs and Ministers have more powers, President Anura Kumara Dissanayake said he expects that all Ministers will know the limits of their powers and act with accountability. Addressing the new Cabinet, he said most of the Ministers are new, not only to the Cabinet but to Parliament as well. The President said he was well aware that all of them are honest and not corrupt and that they have the courage to fulfil the aspirations of the people.

DailyMirror

11,667 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨WATCH: PM Netanyahu Responds to Vice President Vance's Statements Against Israel Q: J.D. Vance recently told Joe Rogan (podcast) that Israel is trying to sabotage the end of the war with Iran. He said that there are elements in your system who are trying to influence American public opinion so that the war continues. How do you respond to that? Netanyahu: That is not true. I had a very good conversation with the Vice President this morning, and I think we made it clear that this is not our policy. Individual people in our system can have their own opinions, but I determine the policy of the government - and that is not our policy.
0:33

🚨WATCH: PM Netanyahu Responds to Vice President Vance's Statements Against Israel Q: J.D. Vance recently told Joe Rogan (podcast) that Israel is trying to sabotage the end of the war with Iran. He said that there are elements in your system who are trying to influence American public opinion so that the war continues. How do you respond to that? Netanyahu: That is not true. I had a very good conversation with the Vice President this morning, and I think we made it clear that this is not our policy. Individual people in our system can have their own opinions, but I determine the policy of the government - and that is not our policy.

Raylan Givens

32,137 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

DSA candidate Melat Kiros: "We need to have messengers like Graham Platner... A lot of folks are saying, 'Maybe he could have changed, but that doesn't mean that we have to elect him senator.' And I'm like, I actually think it does. I do. I think we have to show -- particularly young white men who have said some of the outlandish things he has said when he was younger, who have experimented with tattoos in the way that he has -- for them to know that those mistakes are not the end-all-be-all and that there is redemption and opportunity after the fact."
1:27

DSA candidate Melat Kiros: "We need to have messengers like Graham Platner... A lot of folks are saying, 'Maybe he could have changed, but that doesn't mean that we have to elect him senator.' And I'm like, I actually think it does. I do. I think we have to show -- particularly young white men who have said some of the outlandish things he has said when he was younger, who have experimented with tattoos in the way that he has -- for them to know that those mistakes are not the end-all-be-all and that there is redemption and opportunity after the fact."

Breitbart News

41,253 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jeffrey Sachs: a president stood at the UN and claimed the right to annihilate a civilization. Congress said nothing. That is the constitutional order collapsing in public. “I shuddered then, and I shudder now that a president of the United States can stand at the podium of the UN General Assembly speaking to world leaders in a language of annihilation of other countries and of sending them to hell. It was ghastly, unprecedented, totally disgusting, disgraceful for the United States. But I would also say a measure of how broken the constitutional order of the United States is. Trump basically said, like a madman, which I think arguably he is, that he and he alone will decide the survival of Iran. He said that he has a big, big choice to make. Maybe Iran will be a great country. Maybe Iran will be annihilated. Maybe Trump will send it to hell. And not only was the language vulgar in a way that I certainly could never in my lifetime have imagined coming from a president of the United States or anybody standing at the UN podium—because what Trump said was odious and completely in violation of every religious, moral, ethical, and legal standard that we have in this world—it was also a measure of the brazen collapse of our Constitution. Is there a political system where one man decides the fate of another civilization? Is that how the American system works? Of course the answer is no. The founding fathers who rebelled against a mad King George III were very explicit in the Declaration of Independence, celebrated this year 250 years after its issuance. We’re in the 250th anniversary, one that Trump says is about our freedom. It was explicitly that King George arrogated, took on the authority to put the military above civil rule. And when the founding fathers wrote the US Constitution, they assigned specifically the power to declare war not to the commander-in-chief, but solely and exclusively—and not by choice, not if they care about it or want to or want to delegate it or not, but solely—to the United States Congress. And Trump said yesterday he doesn’t care what the public thinks. He doesn’t care what the vote is. He says it doesn’t even cross my mind. And he said earlier this year, when he was asked, well, are there any limits on your power? He thought about it. He said Yes, my morality, but it’s my will. It’s what I want to do. Otherwise, no, there are no other limits. What did our Congress do on that occasion? I can tell you, as we know, that the majority party in both houses simply remained silent. That is a violation of their sacred oath of office, which is to uphold the Constitution. Trump yesterday said he’s going to have the difficult choice of whether to annihilate, by the way, one of the most ancient civilizations in the world, 5,000 years old, twenty times older than the United States of America. And what did our Speaker of the House say? Well, he said nothing, of course. What did our Senate majority leader say? He said, of course, nothing. What did all of the party of the president of the United States say, the members of Congress? They said, of course, nothing. This is worse than the Roman Empire. There was a Senate that actually still said something. Our Senate says nothing. We are so broken that not only do we have a madman in power, but there is no respect for our constitutional order. And the president can make statements as he made yesterday, unprecedented in the chamber of the General Assembly in front of the world leaders, speaking like the worst tyrant or gangster imaginable, and not a murmur from the Republican Party which dominates the House and the Senate. You know, I am not partisan. And a Democratic president who dared to be as absolutely mad and deranged as this president would probably find subservience in that party too. So I’m not even making a partisan point. I’m making a point about the collapse of our constitutional order. Have we come to a point where one man, who I happen to think is utterly incompetent, utterly sociopathic, actually—when people are killed under his order, not a moment of reflection or remorse when 150 schoolgirls are murdered, and he knows the truth. He says, yeah, the Iranians probably did it. We’ll find out. No, not any control at all in our system of government. So for me, you asked how I feel. I shudder at the last 24 hours, both at what the president said. It made my skin crawl. I was sitting there in the chamber listening to this madness. I mean it really, psychopathic madness, speaking in this way, with a vulgarity that is unimaginable. But then I’ve shuddered since then at the lack of response by the leaders, the majority leader of the US Senate, the Speaker of the House, Supreme Court justices, anybody to say no. In our system of government, it’s not one person who decides on the fate of another civilization. We are a country, we say, first of all, of representation, and the American people are aghast at this. They oppose it overwhelmingly. They do not support this war of Netanyahu and Trump, which is a two-person war of murder and destruction and assassination of leaders of another country. They do not support it. And the constitutional order is that we are a representative government, and our representatives have an oath of office that only they can declare war. So where are they standing up to say No, you don’t have a penny to spend on this? We control the power of the purse. The tens or hundreds of billions of dollars that Trump has wasted of American income in this flagrant war of whim. Where is Congress to say you have no authority whatsoever to spend that because only we can decide on the spending and only we can declare war. So this is the grim fact. It wasn’t just the awful statements. That was my first reaction. But then I thought, what have we come to when one person can make a statement like this and then remain essentially unchallenged in the United States system of government?” Annihilation is not diplomacy. Congressional silence is not restraint. A constitutional republic cannot survive if one man claims the power to decide whether another civilization lives or dies.
9:17

Jeffrey Sachs: a president stood at the UN and claimed the right to annihilate a civilization. Congress said nothing. That is the constitutional order collapsing in public. “I shuddered then, and I shudder now that a president of the United States can stand at the podium of the UN General Assembly speaking to world leaders in a language of annihilation of other countries and of sending them to hell. It was ghastly, unprecedented, totally disgusting, disgraceful for the United States. But I would also say a measure of how broken the constitutional order of the United States is. Trump basically said, like a madman, which I think arguably he is, that he and he alone will decide the survival of Iran. He said that he has a big, big choice to make. Maybe Iran will be a great country. Maybe Iran will be annihilated. Maybe Trump will send it to hell. And not only was the language vulgar in a way that I certainly could never in my lifetime have imagined coming from a president of the United States or anybody standing at the UN podium—because what Trump said was odious and completely in violation of every religious, moral, ethical, and legal standard that we have in this world—it was also a measure of the brazen collapse of our Constitution. Is there a political system where one man decides the fate of another civilization? Is that how the American system works? Of course the answer is no. The founding fathers who rebelled against a mad King George III were very explicit in the Declaration of Independence, celebrated this year 250 years after its issuance. We’re in the 250th anniversary, one that Trump says is about our freedom. It was explicitly that King George arrogated, took on the authority to put the military above civil rule. And when the founding fathers wrote the US Constitution, they assigned specifically the power to declare war not to the commander-in-chief, but solely and exclusively—and not by choice, not if they care about it or want to or want to delegate it or not, but solely—to the United States Congress. And Trump said yesterday he doesn’t care what the public thinks. He doesn’t care what the vote is. He says it doesn’t even cross my mind. And he said earlier this year, when he was asked, well, are there any limits on your power? He thought about it. He said Yes, my morality, but it’s my will. It’s what I want to do. Otherwise, no, there are no other limits. What did our Congress do on that occasion? I can tell you, as we know, that the majority party in both houses simply remained silent. That is a violation of their sacred oath of office, which is to uphold the Constitution. Trump yesterday said he’s going to have the difficult choice of whether to annihilate, by the way, one of the most ancient civilizations in the world, 5,000 years old, twenty times older than the United States of America. And what did our Speaker of the House say? Well, he said nothing, of course. What did our Senate majority leader say? He said, of course, nothing. What did all of the party of the president of the United States say, the members of Congress? They said, of course, nothing. This is worse than the Roman Empire. There was a Senate that actually still said something. Our Senate says nothing. We are so broken that not only do we have a madman in power, but there is no respect for our constitutional order. And the president can make statements as he made yesterday, unprecedented in the chamber of the General Assembly in front of the world leaders, speaking like the worst tyrant or gangster imaginable, and not a murmur from the Republican Party which dominates the House and the Senate. You know, I am not partisan. And a Democratic president who dared to be as absolutely mad and deranged as this president would probably find subservience in that party too. So I’m not even making a partisan point. I’m making a point about the collapse of our constitutional order. Have we come to a point where one man, who I happen to think is utterly incompetent, utterly sociopathic, actually—when people are killed under his order, not a moment of reflection or remorse when 150 schoolgirls are murdered, and he knows the truth. He says, yeah, the Iranians probably did it. We’ll find out. No, not any control at all in our system of government. So for me, you asked how I feel. I shudder at the last 24 hours, both at what the president said. It made my skin crawl. I was sitting there in the chamber listening to this madness. I mean it really, psychopathic madness, speaking in this way, with a vulgarity that is unimaginable. But then I’ve shuddered since then at the lack of response by the leaders, the majority leader of the US Senate, the Speaker of the House, Supreme Court justices, anybody to say no. In our system of government, it’s not one person who decides on the fate of another civilization. We are a country, we say, first of all, of representation, and the American people are aghast at this. They oppose it overwhelmingly. They do not support this war of Netanyahu and Trump, which is a two-person war of murder and destruction and assassination of leaders of another country. They do not support it. And the constitutional order is that we are a representative government, and our representatives have an oath of office that only they can declare war. So where are they standing up to say No, you don’t have a penny to spend on this? We control the power of the purse. The tens or hundreds of billions of dollars that Trump has wasted of American income in this flagrant war of whim. Where is Congress to say you have no authority whatsoever to spend that because only we can decide on the spending and only we can declare war. So this is the grim fact. It wasn’t just the awful statements. That was my first reaction. But then I thought, what have we come to when one person can make a statement like this and then remain essentially unchallenged in the United States system of government?” Annihilation is not diplomacy. Congressional silence is not restraint. A constitutional republic cannot survive if one man claims the power to decide whether another civilization lives or dies.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

398,091 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Vice President Vance masterfully navigates Sarah Haines’ attempt at claiming that he is excusing Trump’s behavior for power. Haines brought up a past quote from Vance comparing Trump to Hitler, but as Vance pointed out, he was spoon fed propaganda about Trump by the media that was not true. HAINES: “And you also explain your evolution, similarly, on Trump. From calling him America’s Hitler to America’s best hope...” “What are you willing to excuse in the name of power?”’ VANCE: “I would say fundamentally that one of the things I under appreciated about Donald Trump is that many of the things people said about him weren’t actually true.” “Again, you talk about humility. I see Donald Trump, I see a clip of him or not even a clip of him but reporting about something that he said and take it at face value.” “For example, let’s just go back to one of the most controversial things Donald Trump said during the first term said that I was wrong, during the first campaign, is that I was led to believe by the stories...that said Donald Trump said all Mexicans were rapists.” “He never said that.” “What he said is that the...certain South American countries, central American countries, were releasing criminals into our country, including Mexico.” “By the way, that was objectively true.”
0:56

Vice President Vance masterfully navigates Sarah Haines’ attempt at claiming that he is excusing Trump’s behavior for power. Haines brought up a past quote from Vance comparing Trump to Hitler, but as Vance pointed out, he was spoon fed propaganda about Trump by the media that was not true. HAINES: “And you also explain your evolution, similarly, on Trump. From calling him America’s Hitler to America’s best hope...” “What are you willing to excuse in the name of power?”’ VANCE: “I would say fundamentally that one of the things I under appreciated about Donald Trump is that many of the things people said about him weren’t actually true.” “Again, you talk about humility. I see Donald Trump, I see a clip of him or not even a clip of him but reporting about something that he said and take it at face value.” “For example, let’s just go back to one of the most controversial things Donald Trump said during the first term said that I was wrong, during the first campaign, is that I was led to believe by the stories...that said Donald Trump said all Mexicans were rapists.” “He never said that.” “What he said is that the...certain South American countries, central American countries, were releasing criminals into our country, including Mexico.” “By the way, that was objectively true.”

Overton

60,002 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

WHOA: New York Magazine correspondent just stunned the CNN panel with an unexpected truth about President Trump’s health. Dana Bash was attempting to draw narratives about Trump’s visit to Walter Reed — but Ben Terris said he had spoken directly to two of Trump’s doctors in the past. TERRIS: “One thing I can say is true about Donald Trump’s health is that his doctors do say that, that he’s very healthy.” “I had this surreal interview in the Oval Office with Donald Trump and two of his doctors from Walter Reed.” “This is in late December, and I did ask the question of the doctors, one of whom said that he saw Barack Obama when Obama was president — I asked, well, who is healthier?” “And the doctor did say to me, without skipping a beat... he did say, President Trump is healthier.” “I’m not saying that President Trump is healthier than Barack Obama was when he was president, but it is true that the doctors are saying that.” “And so either the doctors are under Donald Trump’s thumb or they’re seeing something that is pretty miraculous.”
0:45

WHOA: New York Magazine correspondent just stunned the CNN panel with an unexpected truth about President Trump’s health. Dana Bash was attempting to draw narratives about Trump’s visit to Walter Reed — but Ben Terris said he had spoken directly to two of Trump’s doctors in the past. TERRIS: “One thing I can say is true about Donald Trump’s health is that his doctors do say that, that he’s very healthy.” “I had this surreal interview in the Oval Office with Donald Trump and two of his doctors from Walter Reed.” “This is in late December, and I did ask the question of the doctors, one of whom said that he saw Barack Obama when Obama was president — I asked, well, who is healthier?” “And the doctor did say to me, without skipping a beat... he did say, President Trump is healthier.” “I’m not saying that President Trump is healthier than Barack Obama was when he was president, but it is true that the doctors are saying that.” “And so either the doctors are under Donald Trump’s thumb or they’re seeing something that is pretty miraculous.”

Overton

372,080 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад