正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

.Mollie explains how the Supreme Court's gerrymandering decision could transform the country by declaring ALL of the Democrats' race-based districts unconstitutional: “Alito wrote this masterful, major opinion, saying the Constitution forbids racism. The Voting Rights Act was not written and could not be written to oppose what the Constitution... says. And so Section 2, which some people had interpreted as requiring racist maps, that's clearly not the meaning. The racism is ENDED. Democrats have exploited these federal rulings to create these very racial maps that have given them an undue advantage in certain states. So ruling these congressional districts as unconstitutional and contrary to the Voting Rights Act itself means they’ll all be going away.”show more

Glenn Beck

2,256,117 subscribers

28,957 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 HOLY CRAP! The Supreme Court's ruling against Voting Rights Act race-based districts throws as many as 20 HOUSE SEATS into question Democrats are now panicking. "States may SCRAMBLE to redraw maps." The 6-3 decision struck down Louisiana's district drawn for black people, and Sam Alito TORCHED IT: "No compelling interest justified the State's use of race in creating SB8. That map is an unconstitutional gerrymander, and its use would violate the plaintiffs' constitutional rights." 🔥

🚨 HOLY CRAP! The Supreme Court's ruling against Voting Rights Act race-based districts throws as many as 20 HOUSE SEATS into question Democrats are now panicking. "States may SCRAMBLE to redraw maps." The 6-3 decision struck down Louisiana's district drawn for black people, and Sam Alito TORCHED IT: "No compelling interest justified the State's use of race in creating SB8. That map is an unconstitutional gerrymander, and its use would violate the plaintiffs' constitutional rights." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

60,338 次观看 • 5 个月前

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 ended intentional racial discrimination in voting and districts. Democrats misconstrued it. They twisted it into a license for racial discrimination in congressional districts. The Supreme Court corrected that today. Democrats don't get to carve out DEI districts based on race. These racial districts violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thanks for having me, Benny Johnson.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 ended intentional racial discrimination in voting and districts. Democrats misconstrued it. They twisted it into a license for racial discrimination in congressional districts. The Supreme Court corrected that today. Democrats don't get to carve out DEI districts based on race. These racial districts violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thanks for having me, Benny Johnson.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

22,348 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that drawing Congressional districts based on race under the Voting Rights Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 6-3 This is a HUGE win, and could have MASSIVE ramifications for the 2026 midterms Democrats for YEARS have sued over and over again to FORCE states like Louisiana to create black majority districts Louisiana's map has now been thrown out. If SCOTUS ends up gutting the act, a DOZEN Democrat districts could flip red overnight.

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that drawing Congressional districts based on race under the Voting Rights Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 6-3 This is a HUGE win, and could have MASSIVE ramifications for the 2026 midterms Democrats for YEARS have sued over and over again to FORCE states like Louisiana to create black majority districts Louisiana's map has now been thrown out. If SCOTUS ends up gutting the act, a DOZEN Democrat districts could flip red overnight.

Jennifer Joanna Aniston

437,174 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that drawing Congressional districts based on race under the Voting Rights Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 6-3 This is a HUGE win, and could have MASSIVE ramifications for the 2026 midterms Democrats for YEARS have sued over and over again to FORCE states like Louisiana to create black majority districts Louisiana's map has now been thrown out. If SCOTUS ends up gutting the act, a DOZEN Democrat districts could flip red overnight.

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that drawing Congressional districts based on race under the Voting Rights Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 6-3 This is a HUGE win, and could have MASSIVE ramifications for the 2026 midterms Democrats for YEARS have sued over and over again to FORCE states like Louisiana to create black majority districts Louisiana's map has now been thrown out. If SCOTUS ends up gutting the act, a DOZEN Democrat districts could flip red overnight.

Nick Sortor

4,440,160 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: The red state of ALABAMA is now moving to get a new Congressional map drawn by asking the Supreme Court to step in following the anti-racial gerrymandering ruling Alabama has districts that are CLEARLY racially drawn! SCOTUS should step in and let ALL states with these unconstitutional districts redraw for 2026 🔥 "Expedited consideration is necessary to afford Alabama the same opportunity as other States to use a lawfully enacted congressional map free of an injunction that cannot be reconciled with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act “as properly construed.” Callais, Slip Op. 3." "...vacate the injunctions and judgments below in light of this Court’s decision in Callais, remand the cases to the district court, and immediately issue its judgments."

🚨 JUST IN: The red state of ALABAMA is now moving to get a new Congressional map drawn by asking the Supreme Court to step in following the anti-racial gerrymandering ruling Alabama has districts that are CLEARLY racially drawn! SCOTUS should step in and let ALL states with these unconstitutional districts redraw for 2026 🔥 "Expedited consideration is necessary to afford Alabama the same opportunity as other States to use a lawfully enacted congressional map free of an injunction that cannot be reconciled with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act “as properly construed.” Callais, Slip Op. 3." "...vacate the injunctions and judgments below in light of this Court’s decision in Callais, remand the cases to the district court, and immediately issue its judgments."

Eric Daugherty

339,133 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 BOOM! SUPREME COURT DROPS A MASSIVE 6-3 BOMB ON RACIAL GERRYMANDERING IN LOUISIANA! The U.S. Supreme Court just ruled — non-minority voters WIN. Louisiana drew up a second majority-minority congressional district to boost Black voters. Non-Black plaintiffs sued, saying it was straight-up racial gerrymandering that violated the 14th and 15th Amendments. The Court agreed. In a 6-3 decision, the majority said: “Because the Voting Rights Act did NOT require Louisiana to create an additional majority/minority district, no compelling interest justified the state’s use of race in drawing these two new districts. That map is an unconstitutional gerrymander.” Exactly as expected: Conservatives (6) vs. the liberal bloc (Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson dissenting). Thomas and Gorsuch even dropped a concurrence. This isn’t just about Louisiana. Shannon Bream noted this could open the door to challenges against 20+ other districts across the country — mostly in the South — that were drawn primarily on the basis of race. Huge potential implications for the midterms. The left’s fear of the Voting Rights Act getting gutted? Not fully there yet… but this is a major shot across the bow against race-based map drawing. No more treating the Constitution like a suggestion just to engineer racial outcomes. The Supreme Court just reminded everyone: race cannot be the dominant factor in drawing districts. Big win for colorblind justice.

🚨 BOOM! SUPREME COURT DROPS A MASSIVE 6-3 BOMB ON RACIAL GERRYMANDERING IN LOUISIANA! The U.S. Supreme Court just ruled — non-minority voters WIN. Louisiana drew up a second majority-minority congressional district to boost Black voters. Non-Black plaintiffs sued, saying it was straight-up racial gerrymandering that violated the 14th and 15th Amendments. The Court agreed. In a 6-3 decision, the majority said: “Because the Voting Rights Act did NOT require Louisiana to create an additional majority/minority district, no compelling interest justified the state’s use of race in drawing these two new districts. That map is an unconstitutional gerrymander.” Exactly as expected: Conservatives (6) vs. the liberal bloc (Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson dissenting). Thomas and Gorsuch even dropped a concurrence. This isn’t just about Louisiana. Shannon Bream noted this could open the door to challenges against 20+ other districts across the country — mostly in the South — that were drawn primarily on the basis of race. Huge potential implications for the midterms. The left’s fear of the Voting Rights Act getting gutted? Not fully there yet… but this is a major shot across the bow against race-based map drawing. No more treating the Constitution like a suggestion just to engineer racial outcomes. The Supreme Court just reminded everyone: race cannot be the dominant factor in drawing districts. Big win for colorblind justice.

Gunther Eagleman™

74,797 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 Josh Hammer reveals how Section 2 within The Voting Rights Act was sneakily used to justify racial gerrymandering: "HERE'S THE CATCH, for Decades, politicians interpreted [section 2 of The Voting Rights Act] as a carte blanche license to create majority-minority districts which are essentially black-majority districts within largely white conservative states..." "When interpreted in that way, it runs blatantly afoul of the 14th AMENDMENT!" and Josh reveals THE MOST IMPORTANT OUTCOME from the SCOTUS ruling: "There's a real enticing opportunity for conservative legal teams to go on the offense and start SUING states if they don't get rid of these majority-minority districts" To sum it up: Republicans will come out ahead of this battle. 💪🇺🇸

🚨 Josh Hammer reveals how Section 2 within The Voting Rights Act was sneakily used to justify racial gerrymandering: "HERE'S THE CATCH, for Decades, politicians interpreted [section 2 of The Voting Rights Act] as a carte blanche license to create majority-minority districts which are essentially black-majority districts within largely white conservative states..." "When interpreted in that way, it runs blatantly afoul of the 14th AMENDMENT!" and Josh reveals THE MOST IMPORTANT OUTCOME from the SCOTUS ruling: "There's a real enticing opportunity for conservative legal teams to go on the offense and start SUING states if they don't get rid of these majority-minority districts" To sum it up: Republicans will come out ahead of this battle. 💪🇺🇸

The Rubin Report

22,769 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 Mehek Cooke🇺🇸: SUPREME COURT JUST SLAMMED THE DOOR ON RACIAL GERRYMANDERING The Voting Rights Act isn’t a blank check for politicians to sort Americans by skin color just to help one party win. The Constitution doesn’t allow it, and thank God the Court finally said it out loud. Americans are voters, not racial inventory for Democrats to pack into safe seats. No more rigging maps by race. Color-blind districts or bust.

🚨 Mehek Cooke🇺🇸: SUPREME COURT JUST SLAMMED THE DOOR ON RACIAL GERRYMANDERING The Voting Rights Act isn’t a blank check for politicians to sort Americans by skin color just to help one party win. The Constitution doesn’t allow it, and thank God the Court finally said it out loud. Americans are voters, not racial inventory for Democrats to pack into safe seats. No more rigging maps by race. Color-blind districts or bust.

Gunther Eagleman™

17,568 次观看 • 5 个月前

Kamala Harris: "We have to be honest about issues like xenophobia, racism, homophobia and sexism. I'm very concerned that the Supreme Court is going to revisit the issue of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which basically still gives us the ability to challenge voting laws that are racist in intent, that target specific communities to suppress their vote. And it should not have to fall on the people who have been the target of voter suppression to be the only ones talking about it."

Kamala Harris: "We have to be honest about issues like xenophobia, racism, homophobia and sexism. I'm very concerned that the Supreme Court is going to revisit the issue of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which basically still gives us the ability to challenge voting laws that are racist in intent, that target specific communities to suppress their vote. And it should not have to fall on the people who have been the target of voter suppression to be the only ones talking about it."

Fabi 🪷

12,286 次观看 • 7 个月前

MSNOW guest Mara Gay says that white supremacy is what drives Republicans to push for more congressional map redraws after SCOTUS struck down racial gerrymandering. When Democrats have no policy or legal ground left, they scream racism. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Louisiana could not create an extra majority-Black district, as the Voting Rights Act did not require it and race had unconstitutionally driven the map. Tennessee redrew its map accordingly, spreading Memphis across district lines. Not a single voter lost any of their constitutionally protetected rights. The panic coming from Democrats reveals the truth: they need court-mandated racial packing to win seats, not genuine voter support. Falling back on racism is their surrender flag.

MSNOW guest Mara Gay says that white supremacy is what drives Republicans to push for more congressional map redraws after SCOTUS struck down racial gerrymandering. When Democrats have no policy or legal ground left, they scream racism. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Louisiana could not create an extra majority-Black district, as the Voting Rights Act did not require it and race had unconstitutionally driven the map. Tennessee redrew its map accordingly, spreading Memphis across district lines. Not a single voter lost any of their constitutionally protetected rights. The panic coming from Democrats reveals the truth: they need court-mandated racial packing to win seats, not genuine voter support. Falling back on racism is their surrender flag.

Media Lies

47,965 次观看 • 4 个月前

Q: What do you hope to see overall in terms of redistricting? Jon Favreau: If Democrats get the majority again, the John Lewis Voting Rights Act would have done away with all partisan gerrymandering, and we would have independent redistricting all across the country. That is the dream, independent nonpartisan maps in every state so you don't have this race to the bottom that we're engaged in right now that Republicans started.

Q: What do you hope to see overall in terms of redistricting? Jon Favreau: If Democrats get the majority again, the John Lewis Voting Rights Act would have done away with all partisan gerrymandering, and we would have independent redistricting all across the country. That is the dream, independent nonpartisan maps in every state so you don't have this race to the bottom that we're engaged in right now that Republicans started.

Headquarters

73,306 次观看 • 5 个月前

Yesterday, the Supreme Court's conservative majority did something that voting rights advocates have feared for years: they weakened Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, one of the last major pillars of 60 years of civil rights progress. Section 2 was how we ensured Black, Latino, and other minority communities had a real shot at electing representatives who reflect their priorities. Now, to challenge a discriminatory map, you have to prove intentional discrimination. That is an almost impossible bar to clear. The Congressional Black Caucus could lose 30% of its membership as a direct result. Within hours of the decision, Republicans in Florida, Louisiana, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, and Mississippi are already having conversations about redrawing maps. Partisan gerrymandering was already out of control. This decision just took the guardrails off completely. We have to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and establish independent redistricting commissions nationwide, and we need to do it now.

Yesterday, the Supreme Court's conservative majority did something that voting rights advocates have feared for years: they weakened Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, one of the last major pillars of 60 years of civil rights progress. Section 2 was how we ensured Black, Latino, and other minority communities had a real shot at electing representatives who reflect their priorities. Now, to challenge a discriminatory map, you have to prove intentional discrimination. That is an almost impossible bar to clear. The Congressional Black Caucus could lose 30% of its membership as a direct result. Within hours of the decision, Republicans in Florida, Louisiana, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, and Mississippi are already having conversations about redrawing maps. Partisan gerrymandering was already out of control. This decision just took the guardrails off completely. We have to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and establish independent redistricting commissions nationwide, and we need to do it now.

Rep. Mike Levin

11,179 次观看 • 5 个月前

This is Doomsday for Democrats. For generations the Democrat Party has sued to create congressional ghettos in deep red states. These districts are drawn solely on an Americans skin color. This is illegal and immoral redlining, but it favors Democrat majorities so the party embraces it. The Supreme Court rightly struck this unconstitutional practice down. No more federally mandated racism! And look what happens next: This ruling could flip 27 Democrat seats red ahead of 2026. Wow. This is a massive victory for America. The best way to end racism is to stop being racist. But Democrats just cant quit you...

This is Doomsday for Democrats. For generations the Democrat Party has sued to create congressional ghettos in deep red states. These districts are drawn solely on an Americans skin color. This is illegal and immoral redlining, but it favors Democrat majorities so the party embraces it. The Supreme Court rightly struck this unconstitutional practice down. No more federally mandated racism! And look what happens next: This ruling could flip 27 Democrat seats red ahead of 2026. Wow. This is a massive victory for America. The best way to end racism is to stop being racist. But Democrats just cant quit you...

Benny Johnson

146,573 次观看 • 5 个月前

#BREAKING: Smart Leah: “In this case (TPS)…the six Republican [SCOTUS] appointees said that Trump’s statements that Haitians probably have AIDS, are poisoning the blood of our country, are eating the cats and dogs, DON’T constitute racial animus. I mean, Justice Alito’s majority opinion characterized that as not overtly racial. I have no idea what that could possibly mean. He did not even have the strength to reprint the comments that the president made in the opinion that excused those comments as not racist, and if you are unwilling to reprint, recite the comments from the person you say isn’t racist, maybe that is a sign that it is racist. Now, what Justice Alito said two months ago DID constitute racism, was when Congress attempted to get states to draw districts that were actually representative of a multiracial democracy, namely complying with the Voting Rights Act. THAT, Sam Alito said was racism, but Donald Trump SMEARING Haitian nationals with such VILE language, that apparently ISN’T overtly racial at all.” 🙄🤦‍♀️

#BREAKING: Smart Leah: “In this case (TPS)…the six Republican [SCOTUS] appointees said that Trump’s statements that Haitians probably have AIDS, are poisoning the blood of our country, are eating the cats and dogs, DON’T constitute racial animus. I mean, Justice Alito’s majority opinion characterized that as not overtly racial. I have no idea what that could possibly mean. He did not even have the strength to reprint the comments that the president made in the opinion that excused those comments as not racist, and if you are unwilling to reprint, recite the comments from the person you say isn’t racist, maybe that is a sign that it is racist. Now, what Justice Alito said two months ago DID constitute racism, was when Congress attempted to get states to draw districts that were actually representative of a multiracial democracy, namely complying with the Voting Rights Act. THAT, Sam Alito said was racism, but Donald Trump SMEARING Haitian nationals with such VILE language, that apparently ISN’T overtly racial at all.” 🙄🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

55,454 次观看 • 3 个月前

STOP PLAYING GAMES WITH BLACK PEOPLE, AND BLACK PEOPLE STOP ALLOWING THESE GAMES TO BE PLAYED WITH YOU!!! thedefiantlawyers an actual civil rights attorney provides a detailed analysis of how Democrats secured the Voting Rights Act (VRA) for Black Americans. However, the GOP undermined it with the appointment of three justices by #Trump. Additionally, he explains how certain pro-Black impostors contribute to this issue by discouraging Black individuals from voting or urging them to support Trump. And here we are: trump has now instructed his DOJ to target #Black and #Latino-majority #voting districts across the country — using the #SupremeCourt’s recent decision gutting the #VotingRightsAct as a legal weapon.

STOP PLAYING GAMES WITH BLACK PEOPLE, AND BLACK PEOPLE STOP ALLOWING THESE GAMES TO BE PLAYED WITH YOU!!! thedefiantlawyers an actual civil rights attorney provides a detailed analysis of how Democrats secured the Voting Rights Act (VRA) for Black Americans. However, the GOP undermined it with the appointment of three justices by #Trump. Additionally, he explains how certain pro-Black impostors contribute to this issue by discouraging Black individuals from voting or urging them to support Trump. And here we are: trump has now instructed his DOJ to target #Black and #Latino-majority #voting districts across the country — using the #SupremeCourt’s recent decision gutting the #VotingRightsAct as a legal weapon.

BMB Empower Network

12,634 次观看 • 5 个月前

The history of this country has been, from its founding, based on the belief that the people get to choose their leaders. The Voting Rights Act is under attack as this Supreme Court tries to take the vote away from so many people. We're not going to let them do that.

The history of this country has been, from its founding, based on the belief that the people get to choose their leaders. The Voting Rights Act is under attack as this Supreme Court tries to take the vote away from so many people. We're not going to let them do that.

Joe Morelle

14,655 次观看 • 9 个月前