正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

‼️‼️🇺🇲🇮🇷 BREAKING | The White House has drawn a explicit, zero-tolerance red line, signaling that any attempt by Tehran to build a hardened subterranean nuclear shield will be met with immediate destruction. President Donald Trump explicitly declared that the U.S. military will target Iran's new subterranean facility at "Pickaxe...

visionergeo's profile picture

Visioner

222,879 subscribers

59,379 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

‼️‼️🇺🇲🇮🇷 The nuclear standoff with Iran has shifted underground into heavily fortified mountain fortresses, placing Washington and Tehran on a direct collision course for pre-emptive military action. Israeli intelligence assessments shared with Washington reveal that Iran systematically relocated thousands of critical uranium-enrichment centrifuges into deep underground tunnels beneath Pickaxe Mountain near Natanz following recent military conflicts. Fearing Tehran is positioning itself for a rapid nuclear breakout from within an un-targetable mountain vault, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is urging President Donald Trump to authorize immediate kinetic strikes on the facility—a scenario Trump confirmed remains actively on the table. This development exposes the limits of surface-level airstrikes and signals that the war over Iran’s nuclear capabilities is entering its most dangerous, decapitating phase. By moving vital centrifuge infrastructure into granite-hardened tunnels beyond the reach of standard munitions, Iran is attempting to create an indestructible nuclear deterrent. Trump's willingness to target Pickaxe Mountain proves the White House will not allow a nuclear-armed Iran under any circumstances, raising the risk of a massive, bunker-busting military campaign that could engulf the entire region in war. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:24

‼️‼️🇺🇲🇮🇷 The nuclear standoff with Iran has shifted underground into heavily fortified mountain fortresses, placing Washington and Tehran on a direct collision course for pre-emptive military action. Israeli intelligence assessments shared with Washington reveal that Iran systematically relocated thousands of critical uranium-enrichment centrifuges into deep underground tunnels beneath Pickaxe Mountain near Natanz following recent military conflicts. Fearing Tehran is positioning itself for a rapid nuclear breakout from within an un-targetable mountain vault, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is urging President Donald Trump to authorize immediate kinetic strikes on the facility—a scenario Trump confirmed remains actively on the table. This development exposes the limits of surface-level airstrikes and signals that the war over Iran’s nuclear capabilities is entering its most dangerous, decapitating phase. By moving vital centrifuge infrastructure into granite-hardened tunnels beyond the reach of standard munitions, Iran is attempting to create an indestructible nuclear deterrent. Trump's willingness to target Pickaxe Mountain proves the White House will not allow a nuclear-armed Iran under any circumstances, raising the risk of a massive, bunker-busting military campaign that could engulf the entire region in war. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

192,982 次观看 • 2 个月前

JUST IN: 🇮🇱🇮🇷🇺🇸 Mossad sounds the alarm, Iran's nuclear program may now be hidden inside a mountain America's biggest bomb can't reach Despite months of U.S. and Israeli strikes, Israeli intelligence believes Iran has not abandoned its nuclear ambitions. According to the assessment, thousands of uranium enrichment centrifuges have been relocated to the heavily fortified Pickaxe Mountain complex near Natanz. Why this changes everything: Pickaxe Mountain is estimated to be between 300–450 feet (roughly 91–137 meters) beneath solid rock, with some analyses placing parts of the complex 78–145 meters below the mountain's summit, depending on the tunnel layout. Military analysts say the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator may not be sufficient to reliably destroy such a deeply buried and hardened facility with airstrikes alone, making it one of the toughest targets on Earth. If these intelligence assessments are correct, Iran's nuclear infrastructure may have entered a new era of survivability, raising the stakes for any future military confrontation.
0:37

JUST IN: 🇮🇱🇮🇷🇺🇸 Mossad sounds the alarm, Iran's nuclear program may now be hidden inside a mountain America's biggest bomb can't reach Despite months of U.S. and Israeli strikes, Israeli intelligence believes Iran has not abandoned its nuclear ambitions. According to the assessment, thousands of uranium enrichment centrifuges have been relocated to the heavily fortified Pickaxe Mountain complex near Natanz. Why this changes everything: Pickaxe Mountain is estimated to be between 300–450 feet (roughly 91–137 meters) beneath solid rock, with some analyses placing parts of the complex 78–145 meters below the mountain's summit, depending on the tunnel layout. Military analysts say the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator may not be sufficient to reliably destroy such a deeply buried and hardened facility with airstrikes alone, making it one of the toughest targets on Earth. If these intelligence assessments are correct, Iran's nuclear infrastructure may have entered a new era of survivability, raising the stakes for any future military confrontation.

War Radar

624,556 次观看 • 2 个月前

BIG | 🇺🇸🇮🇷‼️‼️ Iran is refusing to trade concessions on its nuclear program for reopening the Strait of Hormuz, signaling that even a potential U.S. acceptance of Tehran’s conditions for the waterway would not resolve the broader confrontation. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran will not compromise on its nuclear program even if Washington accepts Iran’s proposal concerning the Strait of Hormuz. The official added that the strategic waterway will remain closed until “all of Iran’s conditions are met.” Tehran is effectively separating the Hormuz dispute from the nuclear negotiations rather than treating one as leverage to settle the other. That leaves Washington facing two major disputes that would each require resolution, significantly complicating any attempt to reach a broader agreement with Iran. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

BIG | 🇺🇸🇮🇷‼️‼️ Iran is refusing to trade concessions on its nuclear program for reopening the Strait of Hormuz, signaling that even a potential U.S. acceptance of Tehran’s conditions for the waterway would not resolve the broader confrontation. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran will not compromise on its nuclear program even if Washington accepts Iran’s proposal concerning the Strait of Hormuz. The official added that the strategic waterway will remain closed until “all of Iran’s conditions are met.” Tehran is effectively separating the Hormuz dispute from the nuclear negotiations rather than treating one as leverage to settle the other. That leaves Washington facing two major disputes that would each require resolution, significantly complicating any attempt to reach a broader agreement with Iran. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

21,027 次观看 • 2 天前

❗️❗️❗️🇺🇸🇮🇷White House officials told The Wall Street Journal that President Donald Trump is leaning toward expanding U.S. military operations against Iran, following a meeting in the Situation Room to discuss three major escalatory pathways. The options under consideration include deploying ground troops to seize Kharg Island—Iran's primary oil export hub—expanding airstrikes to target broader energy infrastructure, and bombing "Pickaxe Mountain," a heavily fortified underground tunnel complex associated with Tehran's nuclear program. The underground nuclear site, located near the Natanz complex, is deeply buried within granite rock at depths ranging from 300 to 475 feet (90 to 145 meters). Military experts assess that this extreme depth likely places the facility beyond the reach of standard U.S. bunker-buster munitions, making a physical ground assault or sabotage the only surefire ways to neutralize it. While Trump has not made a final decision, some administration officials noted his ongoing reluctance to deploy ground troops, particularly after he walked back previous threats to take control of Kharg Island. Despite the highly escalatory plans on the table, Trump also claimed that Iranian negotiators have recently reached out to request an urgent meeting, signaling that behind-the-scenes diplomatic backchannels remain active even as military tensions escalate.
0:23

❗️❗️❗️🇺🇸🇮🇷White House officials told The Wall Street Journal that President Donald Trump is leaning toward expanding U.S. military operations against Iran, following a meeting in the Situation Room to discuss three major escalatory pathways. The options under consideration include deploying ground troops to seize Kharg Island—Iran's primary oil export hub—expanding airstrikes to target broader energy infrastructure, and bombing "Pickaxe Mountain," a heavily fortified underground tunnel complex associated with Tehran's nuclear program. The underground nuclear site, located near the Natanz complex, is deeply buried within granite rock at depths ranging from 300 to 475 feet (90 to 145 meters). Military experts assess that this extreme depth likely places the facility beyond the reach of standard U.S. bunker-buster munitions, making a physical ground assault or sabotage the only surefire ways to neutralize it. While Trump has not made a final decision, some administration officials noted his ongoing reluctance to deploy ground troops, particularly after he walked back previous threats to take control of Kharg Island. Despite the highly escalatory plans on the table, Trump also claimed that Iranian negotiators have recently reached out to request an urgent meeting, signaling that behind-the-scenes diplomatic backchannels remain active even as military tensions escalate.

NSTRIKE

16,451 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran built a mountain to survive a nuclear bomb... It reportedly just made the strike list. Axios is reporting a full cabinet session in the Situation Room to plan a far bigger air campaign, with Trump warning that "next week comes the power plant, next week comes the bridges." Per the report, one option on that table is Pickaxe Mountain, an enrichment site buried so deep that an adviser to Iran's parliament speaker calls it the most fortified nuclear facility on earth. The same adviser warned the region "will turn to hell" if it is touched. Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson took the threat seriously and the target less so. In his assessment, Iran's deep sites were engineered to ride out far worse than conventional bombing: "A nuclear bomb is not going to take them out." A strike on Pickaxe, by that logic, buys pure escalation with nothing to show for it. He also revisited the "obliterated" claim from last June. The DIA assessed otherwise at the time, and its director was removed months later. Larry's reading of the lesson: the narrative outranks the intelligence. The box, as he sees it: the one target guaranteed to unleash everything is the one target the bombs cannot crack. SonofNewAmericanRevolution
52:42

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran built a mountain to survive a nuclear bomb... It reportedly just made the strike list. Axios is reporting a full cabinet session in the Situation Room to plan a far bigger air campaign, with Trump warning that "next week comes the power plant, next week comes the bridges." Per the report, one option on that table is Pickaxe Mountain, an enrichment site buried so deep that an adviser to Iran's parliament speaker calls it the most fortified nuclear facility on earth. The same adviser warned the region "will turn to hell" if it is touched. Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson took the threat seriously and the target less so. In his assessment, Iran's deep sites were engineered to ride out far worse than conventional bombing: "A nuclear bomb is not going to take them out." A strike on Pickaxe, by that logic, buys pure escalation with nothing to show for it. He also revisited the "obliterated" claim from last June. The DIA assessed otherwise at the time, and its director was removed months later. Larry's reading of the lesson: the narrative outranks the intelligence. The box, as he sees it: the one target guaranteed to unleash everything is the one target the bombs cannot crack. SonofNewAmericanRevolution

Mario Nawfal

453,655 次观看 • 2 个月前

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷 President Donald Trump is reportedly weighing an expansion of its military campaign against the Islamic Republic of Iran. 🔹Following a series of strikes focused on securing the Strait of Hormuz, U.S. officials suggest that the military is now preparing for more intensive operations that could target the core of Iran’s strategic infrastructure. 🔹The atmosphere of confrontation has been punctuated by sharp warnings from regional allies. Israeli leadership has made it clear that any Iranian retaliation would be met with an overwhelming response See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:27

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷 President Donald Trump is reportedly weighing an expansion of its military campaign against the Islamic Republic of Iran. 🔹Following a series of strikes focused on securing the Strait of Hormuz, U.S. officials suggest that the military is now preparing for more intensive operations that could target the core of Iran’s strategic infrastructure. 🔹The atmosphere of confrontation has been punctuated by sharp warnings from regional allies. Israeli leadership has made it clear that any Iranian retaliation would be met with an overwhelming response See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

43,713 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi
1:48

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi

Mario Nawfal

85,274 次观看 • 2 个月前

BIG | 🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱‼️‼️ Iran is openly signaling that future U.S. and Israeli actions could push Tehran toward withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, although Iranian officials insist that no such decision has been made. Speaking to Al Jazeera, Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei said any potential withdrawal from the NPT would depend on Washington’s next moves. He maintained that Iran remains committed to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s religious decree prohibiting the development of nuclear weapons and said Tehran’s nuclear doctrine has not changed, while adding, “We do not know what will happen in the future.” An Iranian withdrawal from the NPT would represent a major escalation in the nuclear confrontation, weakening the international framework governing Tehran’s nuclear activities and adding another layer of uncertainty to an already volatile conflict. For now, Rezaei’s remarks amount to a warning rather than a declared policy change, with Tehran explicitly tying its future position to what the United States and Israel do next. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

BIG | 🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱‼️‼️ Iran is openly signaling that future U.S. and Israeli actions could push Tehran toward withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, although Iranian officials insist that no such decision has been made. Speaking to Al Jazeera, Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei said any potential withdrawal from the NPT would depend on Washington’s next moves. He maintained that Iran remains committed to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s religious decree prohibiting the development of nuclear weapons and said Tehran’s nuclear doctrine has not changed, while adding, “We do not know what will happen in the future.” An Iranian withdrawal from the NPT would represent a major escalation in the nuclear confrontation, weakening the international framework governing Tehran’s nuclear activities and adding another layer of uncertainty to an already volatile conflict. For now, Rezaei’s remarks amount to a warning rather than a declared policy change, with Tehran explicitly tying its future position to what the United States and Israel do next. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

38,946 次观看 • 8 天前

🚨 JUST IN: In a massive development, President Trump has just been informed by the Navy that ALL MINES have been removed from the Strait of Hormuz He’s now watching the Strait with SPACE FORCE 🔥 “Iran has been notified that any ship or boat placing new mines will be immediately and systematically destroyed.” “Through Space Force, we are watching every square inch of the Strait, as we are, also, with Pickaxe Mountain and the already destroyed three other Nuclear sites.” “There is a Zero Tolerance policy on mine placement in full force and effect. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP”
1:27

🚨 JUST IN: In a massive development, President Trump has just been informed by the Navy that ALL MINES have been removed from the Strait of Hormuz He’s now watching the Strait with SPACE FORCE 🔥 “Iran has been notified that any ship or boat placing new mines will be immediately and systematically destroyed.” “Through Space Force, we are watching every square inch of the Strait, as we are, also, with Pickaxe Mountain and the already destroyed three other Nuclear sites.” “There is a Zero Tolerance policy on mine placement in full force and effect. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP”

Eric Daugherty

287,714 次观看 • 1 个月前

‼️‼️🇺🇲🇮🇱🇮🇷 BIG | The US-Iran conflict is entering a critical phase as Washington prepares to transition from localized strikes to a large-scale aerial campaign. The Trump administration's plan to deploy dozens of additional KC-135 and KC-46 refueling tankers to Israel signals a massive logistical buildup. This shift indicates that the US is ready to look past minor maritime skirmishes and focus directly on deep-theater strikes targeting Iran’s core infrastructure. According to Axios, the US requested that Israel's Ben Gurion Airport accommodate these dozens of incoming military tankers to support prolonged aerial missions. This has triggered intense pushback from Israeli transport and aviation authorities. The airport is already heavily congested with around 30 US tankers, creating a massive bottleneck for peak summer civilian travel. Furthermore, Israeli decision-makers fear that converting their primary international hub into a major US offensive platform will cross a red line for Tehran, provoking direct ballistic missile strikes on Israeli soil and pulling the region into a full-scale conventional war. Amid these preparations, the White House is actively weighing three escalatory targets: broad strikes to systematically collapse Iran’s domestic power plants, a potential operation or blockade targeting Kharg Island's oil node, and bombing the heavily fortified "Pickaxe Mountain" nuclear complex. Buried 90 to 145 meters deep in granite rock, this site sits at the very limit of American bunker-buster capabilities, meaning a standard air raid might only achieve a temporary "mission kill" by sealing the tunnel entrances rather than ensuring total destruction. The aggressive consolidation of aerial refueling assets proves that Washington is blueprinting high-intensity, multi-hour operations requiring hundreds of fighter jets to operate deep inside contested Iranian airspace. However, the friction over Ben Gurion Airport exposes a widening rift between the allies. While Washington is willing to maximize tactical pressure to force Tehran into a new diplomatic corner, Jerusalem is highly wary of bearing the immediate, devastating brunt of Iran's retaliatory strikes on its civilian infrastructure. Iran’s current restraint is likely calculated; Tehran understands that while a direct clash would be punishing, any massive disruption to regional energy hubs would instantly trigger a severe global economic shockwave. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:24

‼️‼️🇺🇲🇮🇱🇮🇷 BIG | The US-Iran conflict is entering a critical phase as Washington prepares to transition from localized strikes to a large-scale aerial campaign. The Trump administration's plan to deploy dozens of additional KC-135 and KC-46 refueling tankers to Israel signals a massive logistical buildup. This shift indicates that the US is ready to look past minor maritime skirmishes and focus directly on deep-theater strikes targeting Iran’s core infrastructure. According to Axios, the US requested that Israel's Ben Gurion Airport accommodate these dozens of incoming military tankers to support prolonged aerial missions. This has triggered intense pushback from Israeli transport and aviation authorities. The airport is already heavily congested with around 30 US tankers, creating a massive bottleneck for peak summer civilian travel. Furthermore, Israeli decision-makers fear that converting their primary international hub into a major US offensive platform will cross a red line for Tehran, provoking direct ballistic missile strikes on Israeli soil and pulling the region into a full-scale conventional war. Amid these preparations, the White House is actively weighing three escalatory targets: broad strikes to systematically collapse Iran’s domestic power plants, a potential operation or blockade targeting Kharg Island's oil node, and bombing the heavily fortified "Pickaxe Mountain" nuclear complex. Buried 90 to 145 meters deep in granite rock, this site sits at the very limit of American bunker-buster capabilities, meaning a standard air raid might only achieve a temporary "mission kill" by sealing the tunnel entrances rather than ensuring total destruction. The aggressive consolidation of aerial refueling assets proves that Washington is blueprinting high-intensity, multi-hour operations requiring hundreds of fighter jets to operate deep inside contested Iranian airspace. However, the friction over Ben Gurion Airport exposes a widening rift between the allies. While Washington is willing to maximize tactical pressure to force Tehran into a new diplomatic corner, Jerusalem is highly wary of bearing the immediate, devastating brunt of Iran's retaliatory strikes on its civilian infrastructure. Iran’s current restraint is likely calculated; Tehran understands that while a direct clash would be punishing, any massive disruption to regional energy hubs would instantly trigger a severe global economic shockwave. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

46,152 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇮🇱 🇮🇷 Israel may be forced to act alone against Iran: Israel Hayom, a prominent Israeli newspaper often aligned with government views published an article today that was interesting. The article argues that any U.S.-Iran nuclear agreement must explicitly limit Iran's ballistic missile production, stockpiling and capabilities. Failing to take necessary measures would leave Israel vulnerable to an existential threat posed by Iran's missiles, which can transport nuclear warheads if Iran moves forward with its program, regardless of any nuclear constraints. In the event that a new deal fails to address missiles, Israel would be left with no option but to unilaterally attack Iranian missile facilities or related infrastructure to neutralize the threat, even without U.S. assistance. I see it as unlikely that the U.S. and Iran will come to an agreement in the negotiations. I usually don't focus so much on what is conveyed through the media but more on what reinforcements the U.S. is sending to the region. Given that, it is obvious that the U.S. is preparing for war.
0:22

🇮🇱 🇮🇷 Israel may be forced to act alone against Iran: Israel Hayom, a prominent Israeli newspaper often aligned with government views published an article today that was interesting. The article argues that any U.S.-Iran nuclear agreement must explicitly limit Iran's ballistic missile production, stockpiling and capabilities. Failing to take necessary measures would leave Israel vulnerable to an existential threat posed by Iran's missiles, which can transport nuclear warheads if Iran moves forward with its program, regardless of any nuclear constraints. In the event that a new deal fails to address missiles, Israel would be left with no option but to unilaterally attack Iranian missile facilities or related infrastructure to neutralize the threat, even without U.S. assistance. I see it as unlikely that the U.S. and Iran will come to an agreement in the negotiations. I usually don't focus so much on what is conveyed through the media but more on what reinforcements the U.S. is sending to the region. Given that, it is obvious that the U.S. is preparing for war.

WORLD AT WAR

24,074 次观看 • 7 个月前

🇮🇷 🇺🇸 The whole Pickaxe Mountain drama may be a stage set, built to sell Trump an exit that has nothing to do with the real war Everyone is suddenly talking about Pickaxe Mountain, the fortified underground site Trump now vows to hit "pretty soon." Alex Christoforou of The Duran thinks that is exactly the point, and he keeps asking the question nobody else does: what does that mountain have to do with the Strait of Hormuz? Nothing. And Hormuz is the entire war. The wild part? He reads Pickaxe as theater, a sequel to last year's "Midnight Hammer." Eleven nights of airstrikes in, the US is drifting away from Iran, not toward it, pushed back from the Gulf to Jordan to Israel, its missile stockpiles draining. A dramatic strike on a mountain gives Trump a victory he can sell hard: we obliterated the nuclear threat, mission accomplished, time to pause. Which means the pause is the real objective. The moment markets hear Pickaxe fell, oil eases and stocks lift, buying Washington space to rearm, resupply, and lean on regional allies before round four. His darker frame: this looks like a forever war by design, Hormuz the one lever Iran will never willingly drop. Alex Christoforou
33:09

🇮🇷 🇺🇸 The whole Pickaxe Mountain drama may be a stage set, built to sell Trump an exit that has nothing to do with the real war Everyone is suddenly talking about Pickaxe Mountain, the fortified underground site Trump now vows to hit "pretty soon." Alex Christoforou of The Duran thinks that is exactly the point, and he keeps asking the question nobody else does: what does that mountain have to do with the Strait of Hormuz? Nothing. And Hormuz is the entire war. The wild part? He reads Pickaxe as theater, a sequel to last year's "Midnight Hammer." Eleven nights of airstrikes in, the US is drifting away from Iran, not toward it, pushed back from the Gulf to Jordan to Israel, its missile stockpiles draining. A dramatic strike on a mountain gives Trump a victory he can sell hard: we obliterated the nuclear threat, mission accomplished, time to pause. Which means the pause is the real objective. The moment markets hear Pickaxe fell, oil eases and stocks lift, buying Washington space to rearm, resupply, and lean on regional allies before round four. His darker frame: this looks like a forever war by design, Hormuz the one lever Iran will never willingly drop. Alex Christoforou

Mario Nawfal

272,693 次观看 • 2 个月前

"B-2 BOMBERS WILL SOON FLY OVER IRAN" Iran has confirmed that its Fordow nuclear facility incurred limited damage as a result of recent attacks, citing a spokesperson for the country’s atomic energy organization. The facilities, buried deep underground in a mountain in the village of Fordo, are roughly 20 miles from the holy city of Qom. I think Israel will request support from the US to dismantle the facility. Daniel Shapiro, a security expert at the Atlantic Council: "Given the facility’s location and fortifications, it will be difficult for Israel to penetrate it with traditional strikes" "Fordo is much less exposed. Its destruction would require much more specific bunker-busting equipment" Source: NYT
0:31

"B-2 BOMBERS WILL SOON FLY OVER IRAN" Iran has confirmed that its Fordow nuclear facility incurred limited damage as a result of recent attacks, citing a spokesperson for the country’s atomic energy organization. The facilities, buried deep underground in a mountain in the village of Fordo, are roughly 20 miles from the holy city of Qom. I think Israel will request support from the US to dismantle the facility. Daniel Shapiro, a security expert at the Atlantic Council: "Given the facility’s location and fortifications, it will be difficult for Israel to penetrate it with traditional strikes" "Fordo is much less exposed. Its destruction would require much more specific bunker-busting equipment" Source: NYT

Global Strategy

1,297,355 次观看 • 1 年前

My interview CNN International Despite the significant damage inflicted on Iran's nuclear program, it has not been eliminated. Tehran retains important elements of its nuclear capability, and the current absence of IAEA inspectors combined with satellite imagery that appears to show renewed activity at sites such as Mount the so-called "Pickaxe Mountain" complex, is particularly concerning. Reestablishing international inspections and placing effective constraints on Iran's nuclear program should therefore remain a priority, even if doing so has the unintended effect of strengthening the regime politically. Preventing nuclear proliferation must take precedence over pursuing regime weakness for its own sake. Regarding the Strait of Hormuz, Tehran may be prepared to preserve freedom of navigation, but only if Washington refrains from challenging what Iran considers its authority over maritime traffic through the strait, particularly by insisting that tankers use the channel adjacent to Oman rather than the route Iran seeks to regulate. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi's visit to Oman today appears aimed at reaching understandings on the future management of maritime traffic, thereby reducing the likelihood of direct U.S. involvement in this dispute. More broadly, it remains unclear whether the Trump administration has settled on a coherent strategy toward Iran. Washington is approaching a critical decision point: it can continue to prioritize the Hormuz dispute, risking that maritime disagreements overshadow and potentially derail nuclear diplomacy, or it can leave the management of Hormuz primarily to the regional states and focus its diplomatic efforts on reaching a nuclear agreement with Tehran. Trying to pursue both objectives simultaneously may prove increasingly difficult. President Trump has previously warned that if he were harmed, he had already left instructions for overwhelming retaliation against Iran. His latest statement therefore represents continuity rather than a major policy shift. Likewise, there is little reason to doubt that Iran continues to seek revenge for the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei; this requires no classified intelligence to assess. Israel is likely to use these threats as further evidence in arguing to the Trump administration that any agreement with the Islamic Republic is ultimately destined to fail. At the same time, many policymakers in Washington believe that Israel will do everything possible to prevent a U.S.-Iran agreement from materializing, a perception that continues to shape the debate inside the administration. #iran
6:25

My interview CNN International Despite the significant damage inflicted on Iran's nuclear program, it has not been eliminated. Tehran retains important elements of its nuclear capability, and the current absence of IAEA inspectors combined with satellite imagery that appears to show renewed activity at sites such as Mount the so-called "Pickaxe Mountain" complex, is particularly concerning. Reestablishing international inspections and placing effective constraints on Iran's nuclear program should therefore remain a priority, even if doing so has the unintended effect of strengthening the regime politically. Preventing nuclear proliferation must take precedence over pursuing regime weakness for its own sake. Regarding the Strait of Hormuz, Tehran may be prepared to preserve freedom of navigation, but only if Washington refrains from challenging what Iran considers its authority over maritime traffic through the strait, particularly by insisting that tankers use the channel adjacent to Oman rather than the route Iran seeks to regulate. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi's visit to Oman today appears aimed at reaching understandings on the future management of maritime traffic, thereby reducing the likelihood of direct U.S. involvement in this dispute. More broadly, it remains unclear whether the Trump administration has settled on a coherent strategy toward Iran. Washington is approaching a critical decision point: it can continue to prioritize the Hormuz dispute, risking that maritime disagreements overshadow and potentially derail nuclear diplomacy, or it can leave the management of Hormuz primarily to the regional states and focus its diplomatic efforts on reaching a nuclear agreement with Tehran. Trying to pursue both objectives simultaneously may prove increasingly difficult. President Trump has previously warned that if he were harmed, he had already left instructions for overwhelming retaliation against Iran. His latest statement therefore represents continuity rather than a major policy shift. Likewise, there is little reason to doubt that Iran continues to seek revenge for the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei; this requires no classified intelligence to assess. Israel is likely to use these threats as further evidence in arguing to the Trump administration that any agreement with the Islamic Republic is ultimately destined to fail. At the same time, many policymakers in Washington believe that Israel will do everything possible to prevent a U.S.-Iran agreement from materializing, a perception that continues to shape the debate inside the administration. #iran

Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش

16,171 次观看 • 2 个月前

‼️🚨🇮🇷🇺🇲 BIG | U.S. President Donald Trump has escalated his rhetoric against the Islamic Republic, signaling a hardline shift in Washington's strategic approach toward Tehran that prioritizes regime collapse over diplomatic engagement. Speaking on the worsening standoff in the Middle East, Trump explicitly cast doubt on the utility of negotiations, stating plainly that he is no longer convinced he wants to pursue a diplomatic accord with the country's current leadership. Instead, the American president urged a decisive conclusion to the long-standing geopolitical confrontation, declaring, "Let's finish the job." Trump further warned that the current geopolitical and internal pressures facing Tehran have pushed the government to a breaking point, asserting that the Islamic regime in Iran could come to an end "very quickly." This blunt assessment aligns with the massive buildup of American naval and air assets under U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) in neighboring waters, sending a clear signal that Washington is prepared to employ overwhelming kinetic force rather than return to the negotiating table. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:35

‼️🚨🇮🇷🇺🇲 BIG | U.S. President Donald Trump has escalated his rhetoric against the Islamic Republic, signaling a hardline shift in Washington's strategic approach toward Tehran that prioritizes regime collapse over diplomatic engagement. Speaking on the worsening standoff in the Middle East, Trump explicitly cast doubt on the utility of negotiations, stating plainly that he is no longer convinced he wants to pursue a diplomatic accord with the country's current leadership. Instead, the American president urged a decisive conclusion to the long-standing geopolitical confrontation, declaring, "Let's finish the job." Trump further warned that the current geopolitical and internal pressures facing Tehran have pushed the government to a breaking point, asserting that the Islamic regime in Iran could come to an end "very quickly." This blunt assessment aligns with the massive buildup of American naval and air assets under U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) in neighboring waters, sending a clear signal that Washington is prepared to employ overwhelming kinetic force rather than return to the negotiating table. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

18,590 次观看 • 2 个月前

I have just been informed by the United States Navy that all mines have been removed and/or detonated from within the International Waters of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has been notified that any ship or boat placing new mines will be immediately and systematically destroyed. Through Space Force, we are watching every square inch of the Strait, as we are, also, with Pickaxe Mountain and the already destroyed three other Nuclear sites. There is a Zero Tolerance policy on mine placement in full force and effect. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP ( TS: Aug 25 2026, 10:30 AM ET )​​​​​​​​‍‌​​​‍​​​‌‍‌​‌‌‍‍‍​​‌‍‌​​‍‌‍​‌‍‌‌​‍‌
0:36

I have just been informed by the United States Navy that all mines have been removed and/or detonated from within the International Waters of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has been notified that any ship or boat placing new mines will be immediately and systematically destroyed. Through Space Force, we are watching every square inch of the Strait, as we are, also, with Pickaxe Mountain and the already destroyed three other Nuclear sites. There is a Zero Tolerance policy on mine placement in full force and effect. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP ( TS: Aug 25 2026, 10:30 AM ET )​​​​​​​​‍‌​​​‍​​​‌‍‌​‌‌‍‍‍​​‌‍‌​​‍‌‍​‌‍‌‌​‍‌

Commentary Donald J. Trump Truth Social Posts On X

168,178 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The Pentagon built a full-size copy of Iran's Pickax Mountain in New Mexico, and what's being rehearsed on it is how Washington hopes to end the war Somewhere on the White Sands range there is now a granite mountain with Iranian tunnels inside it. Anthony Aguilar says you don't spend that money unless the president is still weighing a move on Pickax, and he lists the three plans he believes are on the desk. A naval push to grab a brief window of control in the strait, which the captured Anduril submersible was scouting. Something against Pickax itself, a bunker-buster strike, a special forces raid to seize the nuclear material, or in his view a tactical nuclear weapon, still on the table. And least favored, a landing on Kharg Island. None of these are about winning. His read is that Washington lost the ground game, can't stop the long game, and now just wants to run out the clock with something it can call proof that Iran will never have a bomb. As he put it: "How do we just end this?" The problem is that Iran's nuclear future now runs through a deal with Moscow, and no raid on a mountain changes that.
37:43

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The Pentagon built a full-size copy of Iran's Pickax Mountain in New Mexico, and what's being rehearsed on it is how Washington hopes to end the war Somewhere on the White Sands range there is now a granite mountain with Iranian tunnels inside it. Anthony Aguilar says you don't spend that money unless the president is still weighing a move on Pickax, and he lists the three plans he believes are on the desk. A naval push to grab a brief window of control in the strait, which the captured Anduril submersible was scouting. Something against Pickax itself, a bunker-buster strike, a special forces raid to seize the nuclear material, or in his view a tactical nuclear weapon, still on the table. And least favored, a landing on Kharg Island. None of these are about winning. His read is that Washington lost the ground game, can't stop the long game, and now just wants to run out the clock with something it can call proof that Iran will never have a bomb. As he put it: "How do we just end this?" The problem is that Iran's nuclear future now runs through a deal with Moscow, and no raid on a mountain changes that.

Mario Nawfal

315,535 次观看 • 18 天前

This video showcases Iran's largest power plant, capable of producing around 2,880 megawatts of electricity, which serves as a vital component of Iran's energy infrastructure. This plant supplies power not just for industrial operations but also for the everyday residential needs of millions of Iranians. It stands as a symbol of Iran's energy independence, and its destruction would deal a massive blow to the country's ability to function normally. If Iran chooses to escalate tensions by launching a ballistic missile attack on Israel today, they must be fully prepared for the inevitable and unprecedented retaliation from Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) will not hesitate to strike at the heart of Iran's power grid, targeting this very power plant along with many others, plunging the nation into darkness and chaos. Such a decisive strike would serve to humiliate the Ayatollahs and force their hand, potentially opening the floodgates for a wider conflict in which Israel will target not just energy infrastructure but also Iran’s critical refineries and nuclear facilities. The IDF's response will be relentless and uncompromising. Israel has one of the most advanced air forces in the world, equipped with precision-guided missiles and the latest technology, making these power plants, refineries, and even Iran’s nuclear sites easy targets for destruction. Any strike on Israel by Iran will be met with overwhelming force, as Israel exercises its right to self-defense and ensures that the Ayatollahs and their regime understand the consequences of their aggression. This isn't merely a matter of retaliatory strikes; it's about sending a clear and unambiguous message that Iran's support for terrorist organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas, and any direct attack on Israel, will be met with devastating consequences. If Iran decides to open this Pandora's box, the Ayatollahs must understand that Israel will have no hesitation in cutting off Iran's power supply, not just metaphorically but quite literally, by dismantling the very infrastructure that keeps the country running. The repercussions of such a strike would be catastrophic for Iran. Entire cities could be plunged into darkness, industries would grind to a halt, and the economy could face irreversible damage. This action would not only cripple Iran’s capacity to wage war but would also serve as a lesson that any aggression toward Israel will be answered with overwhelming and unyielding force. Israel possesses the military capability and strategic acumen to execute such a campaign effectively. And should Iran choose the path of confrontation, Israel’s response will not be a mere show of force – it will be a decisive act that might send Iran’s energy infrastructure back to the stone age. This isn’t just a matter of military might; it’s about demonstrating that any act of aggression against Israel will be met with a level of retaliation that could leave Iran in darkness, potentially forever. Therefore, Iran should carefully consider its next moves. A strike against Israel would not only be an act of war but also an invitation for its own devastation. The Ayatollahs must understand that their dreams of expanding their influence across the Middle East through aggression will meet a dead end when faced with the full might of Israel's military response.
0:56

This video showcases Iran's largest power plant, capable of producing around 2,880 megawatts of electricity, which serves as a vital component of Iran's energy infrastructure. This plant supplies power not just for industrial operations but also for the everyday residential needs of millions of Iranians. It stands as a symbol of Iran's energy independence, and its destruction would deal a massive blow to the country's ability to function normally. If Iran chooses to escalate tensions by launching a ballistic missile attack on Israel today, they must be fully prepared for the inevitable and unprecedented retaliation from Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) will not hesitate to strike at the heart of Iran's power grid, targeting this very power plant along with many others, plunging the nation into darkness and chaos. Such a decisive strike would serve to humiliate the Ayatollahs and force their hand, potentially opening the floodgates for a wider conflict in which Israel will target not just energy infrastructure but also Iran’s critical refineries and nuclear facilities. The IDF's response will be relentless and uncompromising. Israel has one of the most advanced air forces in the world, equipped with precision-guided missiles and the latest technology, making these power plants, refineries, and even Iran’s nuclear sites easy targets for destruction. Any strike on Israel by Iran will be met with overwhelming force, as Israel exercises its right to self-defense and ensures that the Ayatollahs and their regime understand the consequences of their aggression. This isn't merely a matter of retaliatory strikes; it's about sending a clear and unambiguous message that Iran's support for terrorist organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas, and any direct attack on Israel, will be met with devastating consequences. If Iran decides to open this Pandora's box, the Ayatollahs must understand that Israel will have no hesitation in cutting off Iran's power supply, not just metaphorically but quite literally, by dismantling the very infrastructure that keeps the country running. The repercussions of such a strike would be catastrophic for Iran. Entire cities could be plunged into darkness, industries would grind to a halt, and the economy could face irreversible damage. This action would not only cripple Iran’s capacity to wage war but would also serve as a lesson that any aggression toward Israel will be answered with overwhelming and unyielding force. Israel possesses the military capability and strategic acumen to execute such a campaign effectively. And should Iran choose the path of confrontation, Israel’s response will not be a mere show of force – it will be a decisive act that might send Iran’s energy infrastructure back to the stone age. This isn’t just a matter of military might; it’s about demonstrating that any act of aggression against Israel will be met with a level of retaliation that could leave Iran in darkness, potentially forever. Therefore, Iran should carefully consider its next moves. A strike against Israel would not only be an act of war but also an invitation for its own devastation. The Ayatollahs must understand that their dreams of expanding their influence across the Middle East through aggression will meet a dead end when faced with the full might of Israel's military response.

Torsten Prochnow

392,685 次观看 • 2 年前

⭕️ Trump Threatens New Strikes on Iran, Says U.S. Will “Take Out Pickaxe Mountain” President Donald Trump issued a series of new threats against Iran during an interview on The Hugh Hewitt Show, saying the U.S. is preparing further attacks and dismissing the possibility of reviving the collapsed memorandum of understanding. ➤ On Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain nuclear site: Trump said the location is “on the list” and being closely watched. While claiming the U.S. has seen no activity there, he said Washington would “probably give Pickaxe a shot relatively soon” and later declared: “We’re going to take out Pickaxe Mountain.” ➤ Trump said the U.S. would strike Iran “very hard tonight” and again tomorrow, adding that “there’s not a damn thing they can do about it.” ➤ On the failed MOU: Trump described the agreement as a “test” rather than a deal, claiming Iran repeatedly walked away from it after negotiations had been settled. He called Iranian officials “extremely unreliable” and said agreements with them are “made to be broken.” ➤ On Iran’s leadership: Trump said the U.S. had already “knocked out” two Iranian governments and taken out “about 25%” of the current leadership. Asked whether the U.S. knew the locations of remaining senior officials, he said: “Yeah, I do,” but declined to provide details. ➤ On Iran’s nuclear program: Trump claimed Iran would use a nuclear weapon “within one day” if it obtained one and said the U.S. destroys Iranian nuclear capabilities whenever new activity is detected. ➤ On anti-government protests: Trump discouraged Iranians from returning to the streets unless they were armed, arguing that government forces would kill demonstrators. He claimed, without providing evidence, that the Iranian government has killed 52,000 people, a figure about 10 times higher than documented estimates from pro-regime change groups.
7:33

⭕️ Trump Threatens New Strikes on Iran, Says U.S. Will “Take Out Pickaxe Mountain” President Donald Trump issued a series of new threats against Iran during an interview on The Hugh Hewitt Show, saying the U.S. is preparing further attacks and dismissing the possibility of reviving the collapsed memorandum of understanding. ➤ On Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain nuclear site: Trump said the location is “on the list” and being closely watched. While claiming the U.S. has seen no activity there, he said Washington would “probably give Pickaxe a shot relatively soon” and later declared: “We’re going to take out Pickaxe Mountain.” ➤ Trump said the U.S. would strike Iran “very hard tonight” and again tomorrow, adding that “there’s not a damn thing they can do about it.” ➤ On the failed MOU: Trump described the agreement as a “test” rather than a deal, claiming Iran repeatedly walked away from it after negotiations had been settled. He called Iranian officials “extremely unreliable” and said agreements with them are “made to be broken.” ➤ On Iran’s leadership: Trump said the U.S. had already “knocked out” two Iranian governments and taken out “about 25%” of the current leadership. Asked whether the U.S. knew the locations of remaining senior officials, he said: “Yeah, I do,” but declined to provide details. ➤ On Iran’s nuclear program: Trump claimed Iran would use a nuclear weapon “within one day” if it obtained one and said the U.S. destroys Iranian nuclear capabilities whenever new activity is detected. ➤ On anti-government protests: Trump discouraged Iranians from returning to the streets unless they were armed, arguing that government forces would kill demonstrators. He claimed, without providing evidence, that the Iranian government has killed 52,000 people, a figure about 10 times higher than documented estimates from pro-regime change groups.

Drop Site

32,175 次观看 • 2 个月前