Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

BREAKING: This Amendment is a set-up. Hear from Josh Paul why A New Policy OPPOSES Representative Anna Paulina Luna’s (R-FL-13) amendment to the House NDAA. The amendment would strike the word “integration” from several places in Section 219. Don’t be fooled, the amendment DOES NOT strike the word “integration”...

anewpolicyorg's profile picture

A New Policy

12,604 subscribers

87,067 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🔥Marjorie Taylor Greene exposes Anna Paulina Luna as a fake: "Luna's [NDAA amendment was a] cover-her-ass amendment... If she really wanted to strip out and totally get rid of section 219, she would have co-sponsored and supported Thomas Massie's amendment" "[Luna's] amendment only struck the word... 'Integration'... [But] if you read the language in section 219 and you take out the word 'integration,' it's arguably worse because they skip integration and they go straight to full fusion. So that was not a good idea" "So this is the bullshit that happens that a lot of people don't know about because you're not in it" Shannon Joy Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
1:36

🔥Marjorie Taylor Greene exposes Anna Paulina Luna as a fake: "Luna's [NDAA amendment was a] cover-her-ass amendment... If she really wanted to strip out and totally get rid of section 219, she would have co-sponsored and supported Thomas Massie's amendment" "[Luna's] amendment only struck the word... 'Integration'... [But] if you read the language in section 219 and you take out the word 'integration,' it's arguably worse because they skip integration and they go straight to full fusion. So that was not a good idea" "So this is the bullshit that happens that a lot of people don't know about because you're not in it" Shannon Joy Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Sense Receptor

64,838 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

VIDEO: California Congressman Ro Khanna Says That The Language In The 2027 NDAA That Would Merge The US Military With Israel, And It's Set To Pass In The Near Future! "Congress Has Blocked Thomas Massie & My Amendment To Prevent The Integration Of Our Military With Israel! They're Not Even Giving Us A Vote On The Amendment!" 🔴WATCH ALEX JONES LIVE NOW:
2:37

VIDEO: California Congressman Ro Khanna Says That The Language In The 2027 NDAA That Would Merge The US Military With Israel, And It's Set To Pass In The Near Future! "Congress Has Blocked Thomas Massie & My Amendment To Prevent The Integration Of Our Military With Israel! They're Not Even Giving Us A Vote On The Amendment!" 🔴WATCH ALEX JONES LIVE NOW:

Alex Jones

103,388 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The word Democracy is not written in the Constitution. Communists aren’t people. The 19th amendment was a mistake.
1:34

The word Democracy is not written in the Constitution. Communists aren’t people. The 19th amendment was a mistake.

The Redheaded libertarian

117,825 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: President Biden goes on unhinged, tyrannical rant and unilaterally, unconstitutionally declares the 28th Amendment in effect "NOW." "The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land NOW. It is the 28th Amendment to the Constitution NOW." FACT CHECK: This is NOT the case. The deadline passed long ago for the 3/4ths of states to approve the amendment.
1:09

🚨 BREAKING: President Biden goes on unhinged, tyrannical rant and unilaterally, unconstitutionally declares the 28th Amendment in effect "NOW." "The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land NOW. It is the 28th Amendment to the Constitution NOW." FACT CHECK: This is NOT the case. The deadline passed long ago for the 3/4ths of states to approve the amendment.

Eric Daugherty

678,913 просмотров • 1 год назад

I respond to some so-called Second Amendment defenders who are justifying the shooting of Alex. The Second Amendment protects citizens from the state—it does not give the state a license to kill. (Full Video link in reply)
1:09

I respond to some so-called Second Amendment defenders who are justifying the shooting of Alex. The Second Amendment protects citizens from the state—it does not give the state a license to kill. (Full Video link in reply)

Adam Kinzinger (Slava Ukraini) 🇺🇸🇺🇦

65,669 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"I think we should be extremely concerned about anything that undermines the First Amendment. There is a reason for the First Amendment. People came from countries where they could not speak freely. Where saying certain things would get you thrown in prison." — Elon Musk
0:36

"I think we should be extremely concerned about anything that undermines the First Amendment. There is a reason for the First Amendment. People came from countries where they could not speak freely. Where saying certain things would get you thrown in prison." — Elon Musk

America News

32,312 просмотров • 1 год назад

Our tech companies need to show some backbone. For all the people in Silicon Valley lecturing about the first amendment, this would be a good time to stand up for the first amendment.
0:37

Our tech companies need to show some backbone. For all the people in Silicon Valley lecturing about the first amendment, this would be a good time to stand up for the first amendment.

Ro Khanna

66,961 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The essentially open ended support provided to Ukraine by Joe Biden is unsustainable. That’s why I introduced an amendment to strike all $300 million of Ukraine funding from the NDAA to instead push the Biden administration to pursue peace.
1:09

The essentially open ended support provided to Ukraine by Joe Biden is unsustainable. That’s why I introduced an amendment to strike all $300 million of Ukraine funding from the NDAA to instead push the Biden administration to pursue peace.

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

156,312 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro says he will invoke the 10th amendment to keep ICE officers from arresting murderers, rapists, and pedophiles in Pennsylvania. SHAPIRO: "There is such a thing as the 10th amendment."
0:38

Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro says he will invoke the 10th amendment to keep ICE officers from arresting murderers, rapists, and pedophiles in Pennsylvania. SHAPIRO: "There is such a thing as the 10th amendment."

RNC Research

71,969 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Jack Smith just eviscerated the Republican talking point that Trump was protected by the First Amendment when he attempted to defraud the American people. “The First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime. Speech that is used to facilitate a crime — a fraud crime in particular — is not protected under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court precedent on that is clear.”
0:26

BREAKING: Jack Smith just eviscerated the Republican talking point that Trump was protected by the First Amendment when he attempted to defraud the American people. “The First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime. Speech that is used to facilitate a crime — a fraud crime in particular — is not protected under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court precedent on that is clear.”

Ed Krassenstein

307,535 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Shocking news coming in from Manipur. A mob has set fire to the house of Aksar Ali, a senior BJP leader because he supported the Waqf Amendment Bill. Mr Ali has since apologised to the Muslims and demanded repeal of the Waqf Amendment Act. No outrage. Democracy is not in danger.
0:37

Shocking news coming in from Manipur. A mob has set fire to the house of Aksar Ali, a senior BJP leader because he supported the Waqf Amendment Bill. Mr Ali has since apologised to the Muslims and demanded repeal of the Waqf Amendment Act. No outrage. Democracy is not in danger.

Anand Ranganathan

504,505 просмотров • 1 год назад

"I think we should be extremely concerned about anything that undermines the First Amendment. There is a reason for the 1st Amendment. People came from countries where they could not speak freely - where saying certain things would get you thrown in prison." - Elon Musk 🔊
0:46

"I think we should be extremely concerned about anything that undermines the First Amendment. There is a reason for the 1st Amendment. People came from countries where they could not speak freely - where saying certain things would get you thrown in prison." - Elon Musk 🔊

Wall Street Mav

1,857,214 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇺🇸🇮🇱 The House just passed U.S.-Israel defense integration in the NDAA. It even refused to let members vote on removing it. Ana Kasparian says the question of how much sway Israel holds over Washington stopped being interesting. The Rules Committee answered it. Section 219 sets up a Pentagon "executive agent" to run joint U.S.-Israel defense R&D, testing and industrial cooperation. Massie and Khanna filed a bipartisan amendment to strip it. The Rules Committee never let it reach the floor. Ana Kasparian
2:18

🇺🇸🇮🇱 The House just passed U.S.-Israel defense integration in the NDAA. It even refused to let members vote on removing it. Ana Kasparian says the question of how much sway Israel holds over Washington stopped being interesting. The Rules Committee answered it. Section 219 sets up a Pentagon "executive agent" to run joint U.S.-Israel defense R&D, testing and industrial cooperation. Massie and Khanna filed a bipartisan amendment to strip it. The Rules Committee never let it reach the floor. Ana Kasparian

Mario Nawfal

120,260 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Massie: I think what’s even more concerning is, in the NDAA, Section 219, which is going to start commingling our military supply chains and technology with Israel’s. It doesn’t make sense to do that with a country of 10 million people. But they’ve got that in the NDAA. I’m told that’s not coming up this week, but we know it’s going to come up sometime—probably soon. So I’ve offered an amendment to strip Section 219—it was called Section 224—from that bill.
1:02

Massie: I think what’s even more concerning is, in the NDAA, Section 219, which is going to start commingling our military supply chains and technology with Israel’s. It doesn’t make sense to do that with a country of 10 million people. But they’ve got that in the NDAA. I’m told that’s not coming up this week, but we know it’s going to come up sometime—probably soon. So I’ve offered an amendment to strip Section 219—it was called Section 224—from that bill.

Acyn

361,528 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I’m with Carl Higbie. The authors of the 14th Amendment made it pretty clear: birthright citizenship is NOT in the text of the Amendment. It does not take a law degree to figure that out. SCOTUS failed. Congress must act. Anchors Away!
1:09

I’m with Carl Higbie. The authors of the 14th Amendment made it pretty clear: birthright citizenship is NOT in the text of the Amendment. It does not take a law degree to figure that out. SCOTUS failed. Congress must act. Anchors Away!

Rep. Andy Ogles

14,947 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Clarence Thomas explained the Second Amendment in one sentence. And every politician who talks about what gun rights they are willing to “let” you keep should hear it. The Second Amendment does not grant the right. It assumes the right already exists. That means the government does not give you the right to keep and bear arms. The amendment tells the government what it cannot do to a right you already had. Rights first. Government second. That is the order. And once you understand that, every gun law looks different. Because now the government is the one that has to explain itself. Not you. Then Thomas tells a story about Justice Breyer asking what he would do if a man with a machete walked up on his porch demanding money. Thomas’s answer? He would be cleaning his guns. That is why this clip hits different. He does not just rule on the Second Amendment. He understands it. He lives it. And he connects it to the history most gun control speeches leave out: The 14th Amendment. Freed slaves. The right to defend yourself from people trying to kill you. Because a citizen who cannot protect his own life does not stay a citizen for very long. Do you think most politicians understand the Second Amendment, or do they just talk around it? Shop the America Hat here:
2:26

Clarence Thomas explained the Second Amendment in one sentence. And every politician who talks about what gun rights they are willing to “let” you keep should hear it. The Second Amendment does not grant the right. It assumes the right already exists. That means the government does not give you the right to keep and bear arms. The amendment tells the government what it cannot do to a right you already had. Rights first. Government second. That is the order. And once you understand that, every gun law looks different. Because now the government is the one that has to explain itself. Not you. Then Thomas tells a story about Justice Breyer asking what he would do if a man with a machete walked up on his porch demanding money. Thomas’s answer? He would be cleaning his guns. That is why this clip hits different. He does not just rule on the Second Amendment. He understands it. He lives it. And he connects it to the history most gun control speeches leave out: The 14th Amendment. Freed slaves. The right to defend yourself from people trying to kill you. Because a citizen who cannot protect his own life does not stay a citizen for very long. Do you think most politicians understand the Second Amendment, or do they just talk around it? Shop the America Hat here:

Colion Noir

109,757 просмотров • 27 дней назад

The Supreme Court is already decided this… SCOTUS and 1st Amendment Press • Houchins v. KQED (1978): The First Amendment does not require the government to give the press access to information or places under government control. It “is neither a Freedom of Information Act nor an Official Secrets Act.” The press’s core protection is the right to communicate information once obtained, not a right to collect it from the government. • Pell v. Procunier (1974) and related cases: The press has no constitutional right to information or locations not available to the public generally. • Zemel v. Rusk (1965): “Entry into the White House [is not] a First Amendment right. The right to speak and publish does not carry with it the unrestrained right to gather information.”
3:30

The Supreme Court is already decided this… SCOTUS and 1st Amendment Press • Houchins v. KQED (1978): The First Amendment does not require the government to give the press access to information or places under government control. It “is neither a Freedom of Information Act nor an Official Secrets Act.” The press’s core protection is the right to communicate information once obtained, not a right to collect it from the government. • Pell v. Procunier (1974) and related cases: The press has no constitutional right to information or locations not available to the public generally. • Zemel v. Rusk (1965): “Entry into the White House [is not] a First Amendment right. The right to speak and publish does not carry with it the unrestrained right to gather information.”

GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE

45,993 просмотров • 15 дней назад

With their gutting of the Voting Rights Act, SCOTUS is ushering in a new confederacy. First they strike down the voting rights amendment, then they strike down legally drawn democratic maps. Power belongs in the hands of the voters — not unelected elites. From me and @aoc:
1:55

With their gutting of the Voting Rights Act, SCOTUS is ushering in a new confederacy. First they strike down the voting rights amendment, then they strike down legally drawn democratic maps. Power belongs in the hands of the voters — not unelected elites. From me and @aoc:

Lauren Underwood

236,337 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад