正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

BREAKING: This Amendment is a set-up. Hear from Josh Paul why A New Policy OPPOSES Representative Anna Paulina Luna’s (R-FL-13) amendment to the House NDAA. The amendment would strike the word “integration” from several places in Section 219. Don’t be fooled, the amendment DOES NOT strike the word “integration”... show more

A New Policy

12,533 subscribers

86,380 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🔥Marjorie Taylor Greene exposes Anna Paulina Luna as a fake: "Luna's [NDAA amendment was a] cover-her-ass amendment... If she really wanted to strip out and totally get rid of section 219, she would have co-sponsored and supported Thomas Massie's amendment" "[Luna's] amendment only struck the word... 'Integration'... [But] if you read the language in section 219 and you take out the word 'integration,' it's arguably worse because they skip integration and they go straight to full fusion. So that was not a good idea" "So this is the bullshit that happens that a lot of people don't know about because you're not in it" Shannon Joy Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

🔥Marjorie Taylor Greene exposes Anna Paulina Luna as a fake: "Luna's [NDAA amendment was a] cover-her-ass amendment... If she really wanted to strip out and totally get rid of section 219, she would have co-sponsored and supported Thomas Massie's amendment" "[Luna's] amendment only struck the word... 'Integration'... [But] if you read the language in section 219 and you take out the word 'integration,' it's arguably worse because they skip integration and they go straight to full fusion. So that was not a good idea" "So this is the bullshit that happens that a lot of people don't know about because you're not in it" Shannon Joy Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Sense Receptor

64,838 次观看 • 1 个月前

VIDEO: California Congressman Ro Khanna Says That The Language In The 2027 NDAA That Would Merge The US Military With Israel, And It's Set To Pass In The Near Future! "Congress Has Blocked Thomas Massie & My Amendment To Prevent The Integration Of Our Military With Israel! They're Not Even Giving Us A Vote On The Amendment!" 🔴WATCH ALEX JONES LIVE NOW:

VIDEO: California Congressman Ro Khanna Says That The Language In The 2027 NDAA That Would Merge The US Military With Israel, And It's Set To Pass In The Near Future! "Congress Has Blocked Thomas Massie & My Amendment To Prevent The Integration Of Our Military With Israel! They're Not Even Giving Us A Vote On The Amendment!" 🔴WATCH ALEX JONES LIVE NOW:

Alex Jones

103,388 次观看 • 1 个月前

The word Democracy is not written in the Constitution. Communists aren’t people. The 19th amendment was a mistake.

The word Democracy is not written in the Constitution. Communists aren’t people. The 19th amendment was a mistake.

The Redheaded libertarian

117,825 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: President Biden goes on unhinged, tyrannical rant and unilaterally, unconstitutionally declares the 28th Amendment in effect "NOW." "The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land NOW. It is the 28th Amendment to the Constitution NOW." FACT CHECK: This is NOT the case. The deadline passed long ago for the 3/4ths of states to approve the amendment.

🚨 BREAKING: President Biden goes on unhinged, tyrannical rant and unilaterally, unconstitutionally declares the 28th Amendment in effect "NOW." "The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land NOW. It is the 28th Amendment to the Constitution NOW." FACT CHECK: This is NOT the case. The deadline passed long ago for the 3/4ths of states to approve the amendment.

Eric Daugherty

678,913 次观看 • 1 年前

I respond to some so-called Second Amendment defenders who are justifying the shooting of Alex. The Second Amendment protects citizens from the state—it does not give the state a license to kill. (Full Video link in reply)

I respond to some so-called Second Amendment defenders who are justifying the shooting of Alex. The Second Amendment protects citizens from the state—it does not give the state a license to kill. (Full Video link in reply)

Adam Kinzinger (Slava Ukraini) 🇺🇸🇺🇦

65,669 次观看 • 7 个月前

"I think we should be extremely concerned about anything that undermines the First Amendment. There is a reason for the First Amendment. People came from countries where they could not speak freely. Where saying certain things would get you thrown in prison." — Elon Musk

"I think we should be extremely concerned about anything that undermines the First Amendment. There is a reason for the First Amendment. People came from countries where they could not speak freely. Where saying certain things would get you thrown in prison." — Elon Musk

America News

32,312 次观看 • 1 年前

Our tech companies need to show some backbone. For all the people in Silicon Valley lecturing about the first amendment, this would be a good time to stand up for the first amendment.

Our tech companies need to show some backbone. For all the people in Silicon Valley lecturing about the first amendment, this would be a good time to stand up for the first amendment.

Ro Khanna

66,961 次观看 • 6 个月前

The essentially open ended support provided to Ukraine by Joe Biden is unsustainable. That’s why I introduced an amendment to strike all $300 million of Ukraine funding from the NDAA to instead push the Biden administration to pursue peace.

The essentially open ended support provided to Ukraine by Joe Biden is unsustainable. That’s why I introduced an amendment to strike all $300 million of Ukraine funding from the NDAA to instead push the Biden administration to pursue peace.

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

156,304 次观看 • 3 年前

Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro says he will invoke the 10th amendment to keep ICE officers from arresting murderers, rapists, and pedophiles in Pennsylvania. SHAPIRO: "There is such a thing as the 10th amendment."

Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro says he will invoke the 10th amendment to keep ICE officers from arresting murderers, rapists, and pedophiles in Pennsylvania. SHAPIRO: "There is such a thing as the 10th amendment."

RNC Research

71,969 次观看 • 6 个月前

BREAKING: Jack Smith just eviscerated the Republican talking point that Trump was protected by the First Amendment when he attempted to defraud the American people. “The First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime. Speech that is used to facilitate a crime — a fraud crime in particular — is not protected under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court precedent on that is clear.”

BREAKING: Jack Smith just eviscerated the Republican talking point that Trump was protected by the First Amendment when he attempted to defraud the American people. “The First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime. Speech that is used to facilitate a crime — a fraud crime in particular — is not protected under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court precedent on that is clear.”

Ed Krassenstein

307,492 次观看 • 7 个月前

Shocking news coming in from Manipur. A mob has set fire to the house of Aksar Ali, a senior BJP leader because he supported the Waqf Amendment Bill. Mr Ali has since apologised to the Muslims and demanded repeal of the Waqf Amendment Act. No outrage. Democracy is not in danger.

Shocking news coming in from Manipur. A mob has set fire to the house of Aksar Ali, a senior BJP leader because he supported the Waqf Amendment Bill. Mr Ali has since apologised to the Muslims and demanded repeal of the Waqf Amendment Act. No outrage. Democracy is not in danger.

Anand Ranganathan

504,348 次观看 • 1 年前

"I think we should be extremely concerned about anything that undermines the First Amendment. There is a reason for the 1st Amendment. People came from countries where they could not speak freely - where saying certain things would get you thrown in prison." - Elon Musk 🔊

"I think we should be extremely concerned about anything that undermines the First Amendment. There is a reason for the 1st Amendment. People came from countries where they could not speak freely - where saying certain things would get you thrown in prison." - Elon Musk 🔊

Wall Street Mav

1,857,170 次观看 • 1 年前

🇺🇸🇮🇱 The House just passed U.S.-Israel defense integration in the NDAA. It even refused to let members vote on removing it. Ana Kasparian says the question of how much sway Israel holds over Washington stopped being interesting. The Rules Committee answered it. Section 219 sets up a Pentagon "executive agent" to run joint U.S.-Israel defense R&D, testing and industrial cooperation. Massie and Khanna filed a bipartisan amendment to strip it. The Rules Committee never let it reach the floor. Ana Kasparian

🇺🇸🇮🇱 The House just passed U.S.-Israel defense integration in the NDAA. It even refused to let members vote on removing it. Ana Kasparian says the question of how much sway Israel holds over Washington stopped being interesting. The Rules Committee answered it. Section 219 sets up a Pentagon "executive agent" to run joint U.S.-Israel defense R&D, testing and industrial cooperation. Massie and Khanna filed a bipartisan amendment to strip it. The Rules Committee never let it reach the floor. Ana Kasparian

Mario Nawfal

120,260 次观看 • 1 个月前

Massie: I think what’s even more concerning is, in the NDAA, Section 219, which is going to start commingling our military supply chains and technology with Israel’s. It doesn’t make sense to do that with a country of 10 million people. But they’ve got that in the NDAA. I’m told that’s not coming up this week, but we know it’s going to come up sometime—probably soon. So I’ve offered an amendment to strip Section 219—it was called Section 224—from that bill.

Massie: I think what’s even more concerning is, in the NDAA, Section 219, which is going to start commingling our military supply chains and technology with Israel’s. It doesn’t make sense to do that with a country of 10 million people. But they’ve got that in the NDAA. I’m told that’s not coming up this week, but we know it’s going to come up sometime—probably soon. So I’ve offered an amendment to strip Section 219—it was called Section 224—from that bill.

Acyn

361,528 次观看 • 1 个月前

I’m with Carl Higbie. The authors of the 14th Amendment made it pretty clear: birthright citizenship is NOT in the text of the Amendment. It does not take a law degree to figure that out. SCOTUS failed. Congress must act. Anchors Away!

I’m with Carl Higbie. The authors of the 14th Amendment made it pretty clear: birthright citizenship is NOT in the text of the Amendment. It does not take a law degree to figure that out. SCOTUS failed. Congress must act. Anchors Away!

Rep. Andy Ogles

14,947 次观看 • 1 个月前

With their gutting of the Voting Rights Act, SCOTUS is ushering in a new confederacy. First they strike down the voting rights amendment, then they strike down legally drawn democratic maps. Power belongs in the hands of the voters — not unelected elites. From me and @aoc:

With their gutting of the Voting Rights Act, SCOTUS is ushering in a new confederacy. First they strike down the voting rights amendment, then they strike down legally drawn democratic maps. Power belongs in the hands of the voters — not unelected elites. From me and @aoc:

Lauren Underwood

236,337 次观看 • 3 个月前

To debunk MAGA’s “insurrectionist” theory of the 2nd Amendment, just read the Constitution. Everywhere it rejects insurrection, including in the 14th Amendment which bans insurrectionists from ever holding office again. The Constitution does not provide for its own destruction.

To debunk MAGA’s “insurrectionist” theory of the 2nd Amendment, just read the Constitution. Everywhere it rejects insurrection, including in the 14th Amendment which bans insurrectionists from ever holding office again. The Constitution does not provide for its own destruction.

Rep. Jamie Raskin

558,820 次观看 • 3 年前

"It's gonna be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified." Rep Jamie Raskin Well, Raskin needs to refresh on the law. The 14th Amendment Section 3 doesn’t apply to the President (Trump). If you read Section 3 of the 14th Amendment nowhere does it mention that one cannot be President. ▫️Legal Interpretation: The presidency is not considered an “officer of the United States” under the amendment. Officers are appointed, the President is appointed elected. Therefore the 14th Amendment wouldn’t apply to the President as they’re not an Officer of the United States. ▫️Debate Topic: Whether January 6th qualifies as an “insurrection” and whether Trump’s actions meet the amendment’s requirements. ▫️Supreme Court Ruling: This section of the amendment does not apply to the presidency. This interpretation upholds Trump’s eligibility for office, ensuring his eventual ascension to the presidency as the 47th President of the United States. 🔗🔗with more information in comments 👇🏻

"It's gonna be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified." Rep Jamie Raskin Well, Raskin needs to refresh on the law. The 14th Amendment Section 3 doesn’t apply to the President (Trump). If you read Section 3 of the 14th Amendment nowhere does it mention that one cannot be President. ▫️Legal Interpretation: The presidency is not considered an “officer of the United States” under the amendment. Officers are appointed, the President is appointed elected. Therefore the 14th Amendment wouldn’t apply to the President as they’re not an Officer of the United States. ▫️Debate Topic: Whether January 6th qualifies as an “insurrection” and whether Trump’s actions meet the amendment’s requirements. ▫️Supreme Court Ruling: This section of the amendment does not apply to the presidency. This interpretation upholds Trump’s eligibility for office, ensuring his eventual ascension to the presidency as the 47th President of the United States. 🔗🔗with more information in comments 👇🏻

❥❥❥ᗰoᒪᒪie❥❥❥

66,537 次观看 • 1 年前