Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 BREAKING What if mass… isn’t a fixed property? Scientists just found evidence that mass can change. Not in theory. Inside real matter. They detected a rare state called an η′-mesic nucleus where a particle gets trapped inside a nucleus… and its mass shifts. Let that sink in. Same...

17,272 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ƅhnliche Videos

🚨 PHYSICS IS BROKEN! MATTER IS AN ILLUSION, THE ATOM IS JUST TRAPPED LIGHT! A NEW ERA HAS BEGUN! 🚨 For 100 years, physics has treated "mass" as a fundamental, solid particle floating in an endless, empty void (ā„ā“). What if that is a complete mathematical hallucination? What if mass is just light that got stuck in the geometry of space? A year ago, we thought exactly like the academic establishment. Breaking a lifelong paradigm and reinterpreting everything from scratch is incredibly difficult. But mathematics is a stubborn thing. We realized one absolute truth: the infinite ā„ā“ space is fundamentally defective in physics. It exists purely as an abstract mathematical concept, and we must finally understand that pure mathematics ≠ physical reality. We genuinely need your help to break this dogma! DO NOT TAKE OUR WORD FOR IT. DO NOT BLINDLY TRUST AUTHORITY. We wrote the code, we solved the math, and we are giving it to you for absolutely free. Read the preprint and verify it yourself. Look at the real quantum photographs attached. On one side is the groundbreaking 2013 photograph of a Hydrogen atom's electron orbital, captured by researchers at the FOM Institute AMOLF in the Netherlands using a quantum microscope. On the other side is the famous 2015 photograph from EPFL in Switzerland, capturing light behaving simultaneously as a wave and a particle. Notice the absolute revelation: they are visually identical. Atoms are not solid little billiard balls. They are concentric interference patterns-pure standing waves of energy. The ultimate conceptual shift of our IT³ framework is this: The atom is not a "box" that contains trapped light. The atom IS the trapped light. There is no abstract container. There is only the geometry of the vacuum (a discrete lattice) which mathematically forbids light from propagating past certain algebraic boundaries. How it Works (Explained simply from the video): Let’s break down exactly what you are seeing in the simulation engine: ć€°ļø The Cyan Wave (→): A free gauge photon travels smoothly through the quantum vacuum. šŸ›‘ The Kummer Wall (Red Lines): Suddenly, the light hits the absolute edge of the spatial lattice. This is an algebraic cutoff where mathematics literally runs out of resolution (√13 āˆ‰ š•‚). Space "does not exist" beyond this boundary. šŸŖž Total Internal Reflection (Purple Wave ←): With nowhere left to go, the photon undergoes complete topological reflection. It bounces back as its own precise mirror image-an antiphoton. ⚔ The Birth of Mass (Yellow Core): The two opposing waves crash into each other and geometrically interlock. They form a perpetual, vibrating "standing wave" whose energy is trapped in one place. This localized density of confined energy is exactly what we call REST MASS. The Counterfactual Test: Watch the timeline in the visualizer. When the system hits the "WALLS OFF" phase, we computationally delete the vacuum boundaries. The golden pulsating core immediately shatters. The light escapes into infinity, and the mass drops precisely to zero. Matter literally un-braids back into pure radiation. FALSIFIABILITY AND PREDICTIONS: The "Mass Gap" is not solved by adding endless, arbitrary parameters to an infinite void. It is solved by recognizing that the Universe is a discrete, constructible topological crystal. Our model is strictly falsifiable and delivers exact predictions: šŸŽÆ It predicts a new topological resonance at exactly 1088.04 GeV, accessible for verification at the High-Luminosity LHC. šŸ›‘ It mathematically proves the absolute end of the periodic table at element Z = 172. 🧮 It operates with ZERO fitted parameters. All physics is reduced to the strict arithmetic of integers. THE HARDWARE CODE OF THE VACUUM MATRIX: 🌌 Arena: ℳ = š•Šā“ Ɨ š•‹Ā³ over the field š•‚ = ā„š(√2, √3, √5) šŸ‘ļø Witness: 172 topological elements āš™ļø Processor: 57600 = 240² = 1110 0001 0000 0000ā‚‚ šŸ“– DOWNLOAD THE CODE. BREAK THE MATH. We do not want blind faith. Read the proofs. The supreme judge is the compiler, not closed-door committees. šŸ”— Code + Preprint: #Physics #QuantumMechanics #Simulation #OpenScience #MassGap #TheoryOfEverything

Dr. Logvinovich

2,825,624 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Bryson DeChambeau hasn’t played since the Ryder Cup and he won’t be again until LIV Golf Riyadh in February. He says he’s been speed training through the off season though and has a target of reaching a comfortable 200mph ball speed. He’s also been playing table tennis with America’s number 1, Kanak Jha. Speaking to Tom Hobbs from Flushing It Golf, Bryson said: ā€œI’m not playing until Riyadh. I’m going to be going in hot though. I’m sneaky working on my game really hard. ā€œI'm going to start ramping up my speed again. I ramped up my speed in November, got it to where I was pumping over 190 quite efficiently with some slow golf balls and stuff. I got to 200 quite a bit. ā€œI haven’t done much recently though. I was playing some ping pong actually the past couple of days with the number one USA player, Kanak Jha. He's so much fun. Ping Pong is my favourite sport, so I got to learn a little bit from the best in the U.S. He’s twenty first in the world. So nobody's really gotten that high from the U.S. which is sweet. ā€œBut I'll get back to speed training right after Christmas and going into the new season, I want to be close to 200. So that's my goal. I’ll just get to a place where I’m super comfortable swinging fast.ā€ The last time Bryson went after speed he gained an enormous amount of mass. He’s come back down through the weights though over the last few seasons and is much healthier for it. But, if Force = Mass x Acceleration, will he look to add more mass again and what’s more important, increasing acceleration or gaining mass? ā€œThey're both very important. If you don't have any mass, you can't accelerate it. It's a symbiotic relationship. It's actually more like F equals M V squared, that’s more of the velocity side of it. ā€œYou can accelerate too, but what I would say is the most important thing is it's not necessarily the mass or the acceleration, it’s the ability to put pressure onto the club. So you're able to apply pressure and control that through your grip strengths around a circle, that's probably the more important piece. Applying controlled pressure to the golf club like grip pressure. ā€œIt's not that you just accelerate the club, because you have to learn how to control the face through that motion as well. So it's all, you know, you can say it's acceleration, but it's a lot of grip pressure stuff. The more you control the grip pressure and how you're moving that grip, I would say that’s more the answer to your question. ā€œAnd I guess at a certain point there’s dimishning return with, you know, going up in the mass and even down in the mass. There is a sweet spot for swinging a golf club. If you get a speedstick, there's just not enough mass behind it to create the smash factor necessary, and vice versa if it is too heavy, you can’t swing it that fast. ā€œI'll always say swinging and accelerating the club is probably the most important, but the real answer is applying the most pressure to the golf club. The grip pressure. You’re not gripping it tighter, but your hand force into it pulling it and then throwing it around the corner.ā€ Continues in comments thread below. Bryson DeChambeau Crushers GC LIV Golf

Flushing It

606,433 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🫯 A conflicting physical ontology ! One of the strangest properties in particle physics is the spin. The term spin is a historical misnomer. Electrons (š‘’ā») do not physically rotate like a spinning top or a globe. Spin is a fundamental quantum property known as intrinsic angular momentum which exists as an inherent characteristic of the particle, much like its mass or electric charge. In quantum mechanics, electrons are treated as fundamental point-like particles with zero size, making the concept of physical 3D rotation nonsensical. A rotating electrical charge creates a magnetic field. An electron naturally possesses its own detectable magnetic field. Even though the electron isn't physically spinning, it acts exactly as if it were because of that. Moreover the spin of an š‘’ā» has orientation. As š‘’ā» carry a negative electric charge, their inherent spin turns them into tiny bar magnets. Two possible orientations exist in the natural state of the š‘’ā», spin up and spin down. When measured along a specific direction (called the z-axis) the š‘’ā» can only display one of the two orientation state, up or down. But the strangeness goes a bit further; when an š‘’ā» is misplaced or removed from its own orbit, it takes two full circles (720°) to return to its original quantum state. The spin isn’t motion, it’s an undeniable static, resilient force of this elementary particle, listed as one the fundamental constant of nature. šŸ”—

š“œš’‚š’–š’“š’Šš”ƒš’Šš’ š—œš’ƒš›¼

22,933 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten