Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Here's something the physics textbook doesn't dwell on: the most successful scientific theory ever built runs on 19 numbers that nobody can explain. They're measured. They're plugged in. They work — the Standard Model predicts particle behaviour to extraordinary precision. But ask *why* the electron has the mass it...

NassimHaramein's profile picture

Nassim Haramein

45,294 subscribers

12,022 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 SCIENTISTS JUST USED HYDROGEN TO TEST WHETHER QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT HIDES TINY WORMHOLES. Yes actual wormholes. Physicists are exploring one of the wildest ideas in modern physics: ER = EPR. It suggests that quantum entanglement and wormholes may be two sides of the same phenomenon that two entangled particles could secretly be connected by an unimaginably tiny bridge in spacetime. To test this, researchers turned to the simplest atom in the universe: hydrogen. Why hydrogen? Its internal structure can be measured with insane precision. If hidden wormhole-like effects existed in entangled quantum states, they should slightly distort hydrogen’s hyperfine structure. They ran the numbers against ultra-precise experiments… The signal wasn’t there. Why this matters: This doesn’t kill the wormhole idea but it puts serious new constraints on the theory. Physics advances by ruling things out as much as by proving them right. The deeper implication is staggering: We’ve moved from talking about wormholes as pure science fiction… to actively testing them with atomic physics. Scientists are now probing the fabric of spacetime itself inside everyday quantum systems. What if gravity and quantum entanglement are secretly the same thing at the deepest level? Follow for more frontier physics and cosmic discoveries.
0:10

🚨 SCIENTISTS JUST USED HYDROGEN TO TEST WHETHER QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT HIDES TINY WORMHOLES. Yes actual wormholes. Physicists are exploring one of the wildest ideas in modern physics: ER = EPR. It suggests that quantum entanglement and wormholes may be two sides of the same phenomenon that two entangled particles could secretly be connected by an unimaginably tiny bridge in spacetime. To test this, researchers turned to the simplest atom in the universe: hydrogen. Why hydrogen? Its internal structure can be measured with insane precision. If hidden wormhole-like effects existed in entangled quantum states, they should slightly distort hydrogen’s hyperfine structure. They ran the numbers against ultra-precise experiments… The signal wasn’t there. Why this matters: This doesn’t kill the wormhole idea but it puts serious new constraints on the theory. Physics advances by ruling things out as much as by proving them right. The deeper implication is staggering: We’ve moved from talking about wormholes as pure science fiction… to actively testing them with atomic physics. Scientists are now probing the fabric of spacetime itself inside everyday quantum systems. What if gravity and quantum entanglement are secretly the same thing at the deepest level? Follow for more frontier physics and cosmic discoveries.

TheNewPhysics

17,032 views • 3 months ago

Every force in the universe has a quantum version. Electromagnetism has the photon, the strong force has gluons, the weak force its bosons. Gravity has nothing proven till now… Every time physicists try to quantize it the way they did the others, the math detonates, infinities piling on infinities. This is the quiet scandal at the center of physics. Our two best theories, quantum mechanics and general relativity, are each spectacularly correct, and they cannot stand to be in the same room.
0:13

Every force in the universe has a quantum version. Electromagnetism has the photon, the strong force has gluons, the weak force its bosons. Gravity has nothing proven till now… Every time physicists try to quantize it the way they did the others, the math detonates, infinities piling on infinities. This is the quiet scandal at the center of physics. Our two best theories, quantum mechanics and general relativity, are each spectacularly correct, and they cannot stand to be in the same room.

Kekius Maximus

20,734 views • 27 days ago

🚨 BREAKING What if mass… isn’t a fixed property? Scientists just found evidence that mass can change. Not in theory. Inside real matter. They detected a rare state called an η′-mesic nucleus where a particle gets trapped inside a nucleus… and its mass shifts. Let that sink in. Same particle. Same physics. Different environment… different mass. That means: Mass isn’t just “what something is.” It’s how it interacts with the vacuum around it. And the vacuum? It’s not empty. It’s a hidden structure that gives particles their properties. Mass may come from the vacuum The vacuum changes in dense matter So mass itself can change This is huge. Because it flips the idea that mass is fundamental. Instead: mass might be emergent. In my view: Mass isn’t a property… it’s a response to time/field structure. Change the structure… you change the mass. So the real question is: Are particles “things”… or just stable patterns in a deeper field? Follow me physics isn’t discovering matter… it’s discovering what creates it.
0:10

🚨 BREAKING What if mass… isn’t a fixed property? Scientists just found evidence that mass can change. Not in theory. Inside real matter. They detected a rare state called an η′-mesic nucleus where a particle gets trapped inside a nucleus… and its mass shifts. Let that sink in. Same particle. Same physics. Different environment… different mass. That means: Mass isn’t just “what something is.” It’s how it interacts with the vacuum around it. And the vacuum? It’s not empty. It’s a hidden structure that gives particles their properties. Mass may come from the vacuum The vacuum changes in dense matter So mass itself can change This is huge. Because it flips the idea that mass is fundamental. Instead: mass might be emergent. In my view: Mass isn’t a property… it’s a response to time/field structure. Change the structure… you change the mass. So the real question is: Are particles “things”… or just stable patterns in a deeper field? Follow me physics isn’t discovering matter… it’s discovering what creates it.

TheNewPhysics

17,272 views • 4 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: The universe might not decide the past… until the future happens. In the delayed choice experiment, a particle behaves like a wave or a particle after it’s already passed the slits. Read that again. The outcome isn’t decided when it happens… it’s decided when it’s observed. Standard physics says: “measurement collapses the wavefunction.” But look deeper. In my framework: The system isn’t moving forward through time It exists as a complete structure across time So nothing is “changing the past”… The past was never fixed to begin with. What we call reality is just the slice we observe. So the real question is: If the future helps define the past… what does that say about time itself? Follow for deeper physics beyond spacetime.
0:10

🚨 BREAKING: The universe might not decide the past… until the future happens. In the delayed choice experiment, a particle behaves like a wave or a particle after it’s already passed the slits. Read that again. The outcome isn’t decided when it happens… it’s decided when it’s observed. Standard physics says: “measurement collapses the wavefunction.” But look deeper. In my framework: The system isn’t moving forward through time It exists as a complete structure across time So nothing is “changing the past”… The past was never fixed to begin with. What we call reality is just the slice we observe. So the real question is: If the future helps define the past… what does that say about time itself? Follow for deeper physics beyond spacetime.

TheNewPhysics

106,832 views • 4 months ago

🚨 Scientists just used Fibonacci to control quantum matter. Not as math… But as timing. Instead of repeating signals, they fed qubits a pattern that never perfectly repeats. And something strange happened: The system stopped falling apart. It stabilized itself. Not randomly… But because of the structure. This isn’t about numbers. It’s proof that pattern controls reality deeper than we thought. The real question is: If structure can stabilize quantum systems… What else is it shaping that we don’t see? Follow for deeper physics insights
0:10

🚨 Scientists just used Fibonacci to control quantum matter. Not as math… But as timing. Instead of repeating signals, they fed qubits a pattern that never perfectly repeats. And something strange happened: The system stopped falling apart. It stabilized itself. Not randomly… But because of the structure. This isn’t about numbers. It’s proof that pattern controls reality deeper than we thought. The real question is: If structure can stabilize quantum systems… What else is it shaping that we don’t see? Follow for deeper physics insights

TheNewPhysics

21,521 views • 4 months ago

🫯 A conflicting physical ontology ! One of the strangest properties in particle physics is the spin. The term spin is a historical misnomer. Electrons (𝑒⁻) do not physically rotate like a spinning top or a globe. Spin is a fundamental quantum property known as intrinsic angular momentum which exists as an inherent characteristic of the particle, much like its mass or electric charge. In quantum mechanics, electrons are treated as fundamental point-like particles with zero size, making the concept of physical 3D rotation nonsensical. A rotating electrical charge creates a magnetic field. An electron naturally possesses its own detectable magnetic field. Even though the electron isn't physically spinning, it acts exactly as if it were because of that. Moreover the spin of an 𝑒⁻ has orientation. As 𝑒⁻ carry a negative electric charge, their inherent spin turns them into tiny bar magnets. Two possible orientations exist in the natural state of the 𝑒⁻, spin up and spin down. When measured along a specific direction (called the z-axis) the 𝑒⁻ can only display one of the two orientation state, up or down. But the strangeness goes a bit further; when an 𝑒⁻ is misplaced or removed from its own orbit, it takes two full circles (720°) to return to its original quantum state. The spin isn’t motion, it’s an undeniable static, resilient force of this elementary particle, listed as one the fundamental constant of nature. 🔗
0:12

🫯 A conflicting physical ontology ! One of the strangest properties in particle physics is the spin. The term spin is a historical misnomer. Electrons (𝑒⁻) do not physically rotate like a spinning top or a globe. Spin is a fundamental quantum property known as intrinsic angular momentum which exists as an inherent characteristic of the particle, much like its mass or electric charge. In quantum mechanics, electrons are treated as fundamental point-like particles with zero size, making the concept of physical 3D rotation nonsensical. A rotating electrical charge creates a magnetic field. An electron naturally possesses its own detectable magnetic field. Even though the electron isn't physically spinning, it acts exactly as if it were because of that. Moreover the spin of an 𝑒⁻ has orientation. As 𝑒⁻ carry a negative electric charge, their inherent spin turns them into tiny bar magnets. Two possible orientations exist in the natural state of the 𝑒⁻, spin up and spin down. When measured along a specific direction (called the z-axis) the 𝑒⁻ can only display one of the two orientation state, up or down. But the strangeness goes a bit further; when an 𝑒⁻ is misplaced or removed from its own orbit, it takes two full circles (720°) to return to its original quantum state. The spin isn’t motion, it’s an undeniable static, resilient force of this elementary particle, listed as one the fundamental constant of nature. 🔗

𝓜𝒂𝒖𝒓𝒊𝔃𝒊𝒐 𝗜𝒃𝛼

22,933 views • 1 month ago

The Sabotaging Practice of Over Supply and Sameness in the NFT Space. The current zeitgeist of the NFT space is that the same artists are doing the same kind of work five times a year, with project after project leaving a trail of disappointment and discontent among collectors and all of us watching in disbelief as huge resources are extracted from the space over work that feels like it could be left as an "artist study." I understand that you can do what you want with your money as collectors, but we are killing the whole space with this incestuous practice. No artist is that prolific to be able to do 5 collections of 100+ pieces each every year and actually deliver innovation and some kind of creative evolution. Of course, they can pretend play that the work has something new, but there is no precedent nor proof that that has ever happened in the speed that it happens in the NFT space. Again, people are free to through away their resources on whatever they want but with this way of doing things, we more and more are going to start seeing the consequences. Oh! There are consequences? Yes. Maybe unintended, but there are. Let's see. Let's start with the loss of belief in the NFT space as somewhere where emerging artists can come and find support for their experiments. Why even bother to bring experiments, innovation, and new ways to think of art on the blockchain if the same people have all the collectors hypnotized with their magical flutes? Why even try to come to a space where taking risks and challenging the status quo (the mission of art!!!) is overlooked? This makes the NFT space a social club and not a space for art. I guess it is fine, but IMO it is a recipe for disaster. New collectors stay away because the art will slowly but surely become stale and un-challenging. Why even bother to come and see what is happening here if you can't, as a collector, see new weird and up-and-coming artists? The amount of noise emitted by the same artists doing the same art over and over, drowns out any new voices. Again. A recipe for disaster. The NFT space is becoming a space of disappointment and doubt. We think that collections going to zero one after the other, over and over, is not damaging? I feel we are kidding ourselves. Disappointment piles up, and again, the people who will hurt are the emerging artists, the new blood, the ones who are willing to risk the most and, in return, put fire in this cold space of sameness. I love this space—don't get me wrong—it has changed my life, and I believe it has a ton of potential, but things need to change for it to become a beacon of light in art. But we need to support new voices. We need to support new ideas. The challenge is huge. I hope to contribute all I can to this change. I hope more and more see how exciting it is to go out and try to discover what else is out there and move this space forward. But again, I understand the leaps of faith needed, but if there is a space that is based on that, it's the NFT space...so there is hope. We will see. 📺by Boldtron
0:12

The Sabotaging Practice of Over Supply and Sameness in the NFT Space. The current zeitgeist of the NFT space is that the same artists are doing the same kind of work five times a year, with project after project leaving a trail of disappointment and discontent among collectors and all of us watching in disbelief as huge resources are extracted from the space over work that feels like it could be left as an "artist study." I understand that you can do what you want with your money as collectors, but we are killing the whole space with this incestuous practice. No artist is that prolific to be able to do 5 collections of 100+ pieces each every year and actually deliver innovation and some kind of creative evolution. Of course, they can pretend play that the work has something new, but there is no precedent nor proof that that has ever happened in the speed that it happens in the NFT space. Again, people are free to through away their resources on whatever they want but with this way of doing things, we more and more are going to start seeing the consequences. Oh! There are consequences? Yes. Maybe unintended, but there are. Let's see. Let's start with the loss of belief in the NFT space as somewhere where emerging artists can come and find support for their experiments. Why even bother to bring experiments, innovation, and new ways to think of art on the blockchain if the same people have all the collectors hypnotized with their magical flutes? Why even try to come to a space where taking risks and challenging the status quo (the mission of art!!!) is overlooked? This makes the NFT space a social club and not a space for art. I guess it is fine, but IMO it is a recipe for disaster. New collectors stay away because the art will slowly but surely become stale and un-challenging. Why even bother to come and see what is happening here if you can't, as a collector, see new weird and up-and-coming artists? The amount of noise emitted by the same artists doing the same art over and over, drowns out any new voices. Again. A recipe for disaster. The NFT space is becoming a space of disappointment and doubt. We think that collections going to zero one after the other, over and over, is not damaging? I feel we are kidding ourselves. Disappointment piles up, and again, the people who will hurt are the emerging artists, the new blood, the ones who are willing to risk the most and, in return, put fire in this cold space of sameness. I love this space—don't get me wrong—it has changed my life, and I believe it has a ton of potential, but things need to change for it to become a beacon of light in art. But we need to support new voices. We need to support new ideas. The challenge is huge. I hope to contribute all I can to this change. I hope more and more see how exciting it is to go out and try to discover what else is out there and move this space forward. But again, I understand the leaps of faith needed, but if there is a space that is based on that, it's the NFT space...so there is hope. We will see. 📺by Boldtron

alejandro cartagena

98,261 views • 2 years ago

A very interesting theory someone brought to Jon Bray's attention is that this van in the parking area where Charlie ends up getting carried to after he is damaged pops the trunk just seconds before the shooting. Apparently acoustic analysis of all sounds at that time support that a real shot was fired from the rooftop area into the back of this van and that possibly a detonation was triggered by the sound. Here is a link to his post about it. You should look at his page and all of the amazing work he has done on this. No one earth has more credibility when it comes to the shaped charge theory. Jon Bray Here is his interview with TriggerSmart on YouTube.
0:10

A very interesting theory someone brought to Jon Bray's attention is that this van in the parking area where Charlie ends up getting carried to after he is damaged pops the trunk just seconds before the shooting. Apparently acoustic analysis of all sounds at that time support that a real shot was fired from the rooftop area into the back of this van and that possibly a detonation was triggered by the sound. Here is a link to his post about it. You should look at his page and all of the amazing work he has done on this. No one earth has more credibility when it comes to the shaped charge theory. Jon Bray Here is his interview with TriggerSmart on YouTube.

AmericaOnlyBro

75,535 views • 1 month ago

The Gaussian Wave Packet ✍️ It is a way to describe a quantum particle, like an electron, that is located in a certain area of space instead of being spread out everywhere. It forms a bell-shaped curve, where the peak of the curve indicates the most likely place to find the particle. This shape is special because it offers the best way to pack a particle; it meets the physical limit set by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, striking the best balance between knowing a particle's position and its momentum. However, because this packet consists of many different overlapping waves, it is naturally unstable for a free particle. Over time, these internal waves travel at slightly different speeds, which causes the bell curve to gradually flatten and widen. This process is known as dispersion. In simpler terms, the longer a quantum particle travels freely, the more unclear its exact location becomes. Video : Jeedecode
0:16

The Gaussian Wave Packet ✍️ It is a way to describe a quantum particle, like an electron, that is located in a certain area of space instead of being spread out everywhere. It forms a bell-shaped curve, where the peak of the curve indicates the most likely place to find the particle. This shape is special because it offers the best way to pack a particle; it meets the physical limit set by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, striking the best balance between knowing a particle's position and its momentum. However, because this packet consists of many different overlapping waves, it is naturally unstable for a free particle. Over time, these internal waves travel at slightly different speeds, which causes the bell curve to gradually flatten and widen. This process is known as dispersion. In simpler terms, the longer a quantum particle travels freely, the more unclear its exact location becomes. Video : Jeedecode

ScieVision

23,147 views • 6 months ago

🚨 MATHEMATICIANS SAY THE GOLDEN RATIO IS THE “MOST IRRATIONAL” NUMBER AND IT’S NOT JUST A FUN FACT. Most irrational numbers can be approximated quite well by simple fractions. But the golden ratio (φ ≈ 1.6180339887…) is famously the worst at this. Its continued fraction is made entirely of 1’s [1; 1, 1, 1, 1…] which makes it the number that is most poorly approximated by rational numbers. In a very precise mathematical sense, it is the “most irrational” irrational. Why this matters: • The golden ratio appears throughout nature (nautilus shells, flower petals, galaxies) and human design (art, architecture, even financial markets) • Because it resists rational approximation so strongly, it creates stable, efficient patterns in growth and structure • This property has deep connections to chaos theory, dynamical systems, and why certain physical systems behave the way they do • It’s not just aesthetic the golden ratio’s extreme irrationality gives it unique mathematical stability The deeper implication: “Irrational” isn’t a simple yes/no label. Some irrationals are “more irrational” than others depending on how badly they can be approximated by fractions. The golden ratio sits at the extreme end of that spectrum. This isn’t just number theory trivia it helps explain why nature so often lands on this specific proportion when building efficient, stable structures. We’re still discovering how deeply this one number is woven into the mathematics of growth, form, and stability across the universe. Do you think the golden ratio shows up so often in nature because it’s mathematically special, or is it just a beautiful coincidence? Follow for more mind-bending math and the hidden structure of reality.
0:10

🚨 MATHEMATICIANS SAY THE GOLDEN RATIO IS THE “MOST IRRATIONAL” NUMBER AND IT’S NOT JUST A FUN FACT. Most irrational numbers can be approximated quite well by simple fractions. But the golden ratio (φ ≈ 1.6180339887…) is famously the worst at this. Its continued fraction is made entirely of 1’s [1; 1, 1, 1, 1…] which makes it the number that is most poorly approximated by rational numbers. In a very precise mathematical sense, it is the “most irrational” irrational. Why this matters: • The golden ratio appears throughout nature (nautilus shells, flower petals, galaxies) and human design (art, architecture, even financial markets) • Because it resists rational approximation so strongly, it creates stable, efficient patterns in growth and structure • This property has deep connections to chaos theory, dynamical systems, and why certain physical systems behave the way they do • It’s not just aesthetic the golden ratio’s extreme irrationality gives it unique mathematical stability The deeper implication: “Irrational” isn’t a simple yes/no label. Some irrationals are “more irrational” than others depending on how badly they can be approximated by fractions. The golden ratio sits at the extreme end of that spectrum. This isn’t just number theory trivia it helps explain why nature so often lands on this specific proportion when building efficient, stable structures. We’re still discovering how deeply this one number is woven into the mathematics of growth, form, and stability across the universe. Do you think the golden ratio shows up so often in nature because it’s mathematically special, or is it just a beautiful coincidence? Follow for more mind-bending math and the hidden structure of reality.

TheNewPhysics

44,841 views • 2 months ago

🚨 SCIENTISTS MAY HAVE JUST FOUND A COSMIC VERSION OF HEISENBERG’S UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE AND IT COULD EXPLAIN DARK MATTER (OR DARK ENERGY). A bold new theory suggests the universe itself obeys a fundamental fuzziness: its size and rate of expansion cannot be known with perfect precision at the same time just like position and momentum in quantum mechanics. Why this matters: The universe is accelerating faster than it “should.” We call the mysterious driver dark energy (or sometimes link it to dark matter models). But this new idea from theoretical physicist Savvas Koushiappas needs no new particles or forces the acceleration emerges naturally from the universe’s own quantum-like uncertainty at cosmic scales. The deeper implication is mind-bending: Reality on the largest scales may be inherently “fuzzy,” just like the smallest scales. The geometry of spacetime itself carries a built-in uncertainty that could explain why the cosmos is speeding up without invoking exotic vacuum energy or hidden matter. We may be discovering that the universe has its own version of the uncertainty principle woven into its fabric. What happens if this cosmic fuzziness is real? Follow for more frontier physics and cosmic discoveries.
0:10

🚨 SCIENTISTS MAY HAVE JUST FOUND A COSMIC VERSION OF HEISENBERG’S UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE AND IT COULD EXPLAIN DARK MATTER (OR DARK ENERGY). A bold new theory suggests the universe itself obeys a fundamental fuzziness: its size and rate of expansion cannot be known with perfect precision at the same time just like position and momentum in quantum mechanics. Why this matters: The universe is accelerating faster than it “should.” We call the mysterious driver dark energy (or sometimes link it to dark matter models). But this new idea from theoretical physicist Savvas Koushiappas needs no new particles or forces the acceleration emerges naturally from the universe’s own quantum-like uncertainty at cosmic scales. The deeper implication is mind-bending: Reality on the largest scales may be inherently “fuzzy,” just like the smallest scales. The geometry of spacetime itself carries a built-in uncertainty that could explain why the cosmos is speeding up without invoking exotic vacuum energy or hidden matter. We may be discovering that the universe has its own version of the uncertainty principle woven into its fabric. What happens if this cosmic fuzziness is real? Follow for more frontier physics and cosmic discoveries.

TheNewPhysics

32,867 views • 3 months ago

As a gynecologist, one of the most frequently asked questions is about the ''hymen''. The hymen is not a structure located deep inside the vagina. It is a thin, flexible fold of tissue situated very close to the vaginal opening, anatomically at the entrance of the vaginal canal. It is typically found about 1–2 cm inside the vaginal opening, but in many women, it is almost at the surface. Therefore, the common belief that it is located deep inside is incorrect. One of the most important points is this: The hymen is not a closed membrane. It naturally has openings that allow menstrual blood to pass. Additionally, the structure of the hymen varies from person to person. Its thickness, elasticity, and shape are not standard. In some women, it may be very thin and elastic, while in others, it may be minimal or barely noticeable. This is completely a normal anatomical variation. A common misconception is that changes in the hymen occur only due to sexual intercourse. In reality, factors such as certain physical activities or tampon use can also lead to stretching or changes in this tissue. Therefore, the hymen is not a reliable indicator of a person’s sexual history or “virginity.” In summary, the hymen is a small and variable anatomical structure. The meanings attributed to it are largely shaped by sociocultural beliefs rather than medical facts.
0:10

As a gynecologist, one of the most frequently asked questions is about the ''hymen''. The hymen is not a structure located deep inside the vagina. It is a thin, flexible fold of tissue situated very close to the vaginal opening, anatomically at the entrance of the vaginal canal. It is typically found about 1–2 cm inside the vaginal opening, but in many women, it is almost at the surface. Therefore, the common belief that it is located deep inside is incorrect. One of the most important points is this: The hymen is not a closed membrane. It naturally has openings that allow menstrual blood to pass. Additionally, the structure of the hymen varies from person to person. Its thickness, elasticity, and shape are not standard. In some women, it may be very thin and elastic, while in others, it may be minimal or barely noticeable. This is completely a normal anatomical variation. A common misconception is that changes in the hymen occur only due to sexual intercourse. In reality, factors such as certain physical activities or tampon use can also lead to stretching or changes in this tissue. Therefore, the hymen is not a reliable indicator of a person’s sexual history or “virginity.” In summary, the hymen is a small and variable anatomical structure. The meanings attributed to it are largely shaped by sociocultural beliefs rather than medical facts.

Op. Dr. Mehmet Bekir Şen

116,046 views • 4 months ago

🚨 Light has no mass… So why does gravity bend it? Because gravity isn’t pulling on mass. It’s shaping reality itself. In Einstein’s view: Objects don’t get “pulled” they follow curves in spacetime. But take it one step further: What if it’s not just space bending… but time forming stable paths? In my framework: Light doesn’t feel a force It follows the only stable path that exists Gravity = where time structures become curved and consistent So light doesn’t get pulled… It simply has no other path that holds together. The real question is: If everything follows stable structures in time… is gravity just reality choosing the path that can exist? Follow for deeper physics beyond force and particles.
0:10

🚨 Light has no mass… So why does gravity bend it? Because gravity isn’t pulling on mass. It’s shaping reality itself. In Einstein’s view: Objects don’t get “pulled” they follow curves in spacetime. But take it one step further: What if it’s not just space bending… but time forming stable paths? In my framework: Light doesn’t feel a force It follows the only stable path that exists Gravity = where time structures become curved and consistent So light doesn’t get pulled… It simply has no other path that holds together. The real question is: If everything follows stable structures in time… is gravity just reality choosing the path that can exist? Follow for deeper physics beyond force and particles.

TheNewPhysics

11,169 views • 4 months ago

"Look at the dust on the road to your temple. Drive there next Saturday. Walk the last mile if you can. Approach it the way the early Saints approached Kirtland. On foot, in the open air, with time to reflect on what you are about to do. The modern temple experience has been engineered for convenience. The parking lot is right there. The locker room is right there. The session begins at a posted time and ends at a posted time and you are out and on with your day. This convenience is mercy. The Brethren have made the temple accessible to a busy people, and the accessibility is itself a gift. But the convenience has cost us something. The early Saints walked. They walked from Far West to Kirtland for the dedication. They walked from Nauvoo to the unfinished temple on the hill. They walked from their wagon trains to the Endowment House in the valley. The walking was preparation. By the time they crossed the threshold, they had already left the world behind in their bodies, in their feet, in their breath. They arrived primed for the encounter. You will not walk a thousand miles. You can walk a mile. You can fast that morning. You can sit in the car for fifteen minutes before going in, with no phone, doing nothing but settling your spirit. You can treat the approach to the temple as part of the temple, the way they did. The temple has not been diminished by our convenience, but our reception of it has been. Restore the approach. Make the journey, however short, into something that prepares you. The temple will then meet you with a fullness it cannot give to someone who walks in distracted."
0:17

"Look at the dust on the road to your temple. Drive there next Saturday. Walk the last mile if you can. Approach it the way the early Saints approached Kirtland. On foot, in the open air, with time to reflect on what you are about to do. The modern temple experience has been engineered for convenience. The parking lot is right there. The locker room is right there. The session begins at a posted time and ends at a posted time and you are out and on with your day. This convenience is mercy. The Brethren have made the temple accessible to a busy people, and the accessibility is itself a gift. But the convenience has cost us something. The early Saints walked. They walked from Far West to Kirtland for the dedication. They walked from Nauvoo to the unfinished temple on the hill. They walked from their wagon trains to the Endowment House in the valley. The walking was preparation. By the time they crossed the threshold, they had already left the world behind in their bodies, in their feet, in their breath. They arrived primed for the encounter. You will not walk a thousand miles. You can walk a mile. You can fast that morning. You can sit in the car for fifteen minutes before going in, with no phone, doing nothing but settling your spirit. You can treat the approach to the temple as part of the temple, the way they did. The temple has not been diminished by our convenience, but our reception of it has been. Restore the approach. Make the journey, however short, into something that prepares you. The temple will then meet you with a fullness it cannot give to someone who walks in distracted."

Kirk Rollins

21,874 views • 1 month ago

Iran has proven not only that it is the most powerful force in the region. It has also begun to confirm that it is a force on which its allies can rely. Unlike the USA, which, by placing its bases, put the countries of the region at risk, but was unable to protect either them or even itself. Iran's night strike on Israel was a response to violations of the agreement concerning Lebanon. Iran used a new unknown drone in today's attacks against Israel Iran presented a new unknown jet-powered drone in today's attacks against Israel
0:17

Iran has proven not only that it is the most powerful force in the region. It has also begun to confirm that it is a force on which its allies can rely. Unlike the USA, which, by placing its bases, put the countries of the region at risk, but was unable to protect either them or even itself. Iran's night strike on Israel was a response to violations of the agreement concerning Lebanon. Iran used a new unknown drone in today's attacks against Israel Iran presented a new unknown jet-powered drone in today's attacks against Israel

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

150,280 views • 2 months ago

The most interesting part of this robot is not the arm. It is the gripper. Instead of pushing the whole robot faster, this setup adds speed at the end effector. The gripper itself becomes a moving axis that can accelerate independently of the arm. That changes the physics of the system. • Faster cycle times without stressing the robot structure • Less inertia to fight against • Motion where it actually matters, at the tool center point It is a reminder that many performance limits in robotics are not solved by bigger motors, but by smarter mechanics. ——- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:
0:14

The most interesting part of this robot is not the arm. It is the gripper. Instead of pushing the whole robot faster, this setup adds speed at the end effector. The gripper itself becomes a moving axis that can accelerate independently of the arm. That changes the physics of the system. • Faster cycle times without stressing the robot structure • Less inertia to fight against • Motion where it actually matters, at the tool center point It is a reminder that many performance limits in robotics are not solved by bigger motors, but by smarter mechanics. ——- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

46,721 views • 17 days ago

🚨🪖🇺🇸 Why US pilot's rescue op far from 'success' The Pentagon has a long habit of "disguising and hiding the fact that they have been losing significant numbers to injury or even death of personnel," and it can't be ruled out that losses are written off as contractors, Stockholm University professor Isa Blumi told Sputnik Saturday's operation can be characterized as a "success" only insofar as its coverage by the corporate media - "owned by the same people pushing for war on Iran" - diverted attention from other crises, including the war's impact on ordinary Americans, Blumi explained "If there is any success, it is the success of getting people to talk about things other than what is actually happening on the ground," the academic added, noting that based on accounts of US troops with access to information blacked out by the media, the war "is not turning out well" for the coalition Footage from social media
0:16

🚨🪖🇺🇸 Why US pilot's rescue op far from 'success' The Pentagon has a long habit of "disguising and hiding the fact that they have been losing significant numbers to injury or even death of personnel," and it can't be ruled out that losses are written off as contractors, Stockholm University professor Isa Blumi told Sputnik Saturday's operation can be characterized as a "success" only insofar as its coverage by the corporate media - "owned by the same people pushing for war on Iran" - diverted attention from other crises, including the war's impact on ordinary Americans, Blumi explained "If there is any success, it is the success of getting people to talk about things other than what is actually happening on the ground," the academic added, noting that based on accounts of US troops with access to information blacked out by the media, the war "is not turning out well" for the coalition Footage from social media

Sputnik

56,246 views • 4 months ago

They did not take cursive from the schools because children no longer needed it. They took it because of what it was quietly building in them. Consider what the exercise actually is. A child, six years old, is handed a pen and asked to draw a single unbroken line that becomes a word. The wrist must float. The fingers must hold a living pressure, never quite the same twice, always correcting. The eye must follow the ink forward and trust the hand to finish what it has begun. There is no lifting, no stopping, no starting over mid-word. The loop must close. The ascender must rise and return. The sentence must travel from one margin to the other as a single continuous gesture, and at the end of it the hand must still be steady. Twelve years of this. Every day. Ten thousand small acts of sustained, self-correcting attention, carried out below the level of conscious thought, until the motion belongs to the body and the body belongs to the motion. This is not penmanship. It is the slow construction of an interior form. The hand that has learned to carry a line without breaking it is the hand of a mind that has learned to carry a thought without breaking it. The two are not metaphors for one another. They are the same faculty, trained in the same child, by the same daily discipline. Continuity of the stroke becomes continuity of the reasoning. The patience of the loop becomes the patience of the argument. The commitment to finish a word one has started becomes the commitment to finish a sentence, a paragraph, a life's idea, without reaching for the nearest distraction halfway through. Print is a different creature entirely. Print lifts. Print stops. Print assembles a word out of separate, stamped, interchangeable pieces, each one beginning and ending in isolation. A mind raised only on print learns to think the way print is made, in discrete tokens, in replaceable units, in fragments that can be recombined by any outside hand without the owner noticing the substitution. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model produces. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model can steer. Cursive is kata. This is the whole of it. A form repeated daily, for years, not for the sake of the form but for what the repetition lays down in the practitioner beneath the form. The swordsman does not train kata so that one day he may fight in kata. He trains it so that when the moment comes and there is no time to think, the movement is already inside him, older and deeper than thought, and it rises on its own. Cursive was the kata of the literate mind, the daily quiet drilling of continuity, of patience, of a line held steady under the long pressure of its own length. And the signature it produced at the end, that small flourished mark unique to a single human being on earth, was only the outward proof of an inward form no machine and no other hand could ever reproduce. Take the kata away and the practitioner is left with vocabulary in place of faculty. He can recognise a whole thought when he encounters one. He cannot carry one himself. He can admire a finished argument. He cannot sustain one long enough to close its loop. He begins books he does not finish, sentences he does not end, ideas he abandons the moment the screen in his palm offers him a brighter one. And when the machine begins feeding him tokens in the exact shape his schooling taught him to receive, he meets it with no interior resistance at all, because no interior form was ever built in him to push back with. They removed it quietly, across a generation, and they removed it in the last years before the machines arrived. Twelve years of daily practice in unbroken, embodied, self-authored thought, gone from the curriculum of almost every child in the Western world, just as the instruments designed to complete their sentences for them came online. The hand forgets. The mind, having never been taught the kata, forgets a thing it never knew it had. That is what cursive was. That is what was taken. And that is why the thought of anyone who still writes by hand, in long unlifted lines, remains, quietly, stubbornly, and without their ever needing to announce it, their own. Now the question stands open. What else has been banned, phased out, quietly retired from the curriculum and from common life over these same decades, under the same soft excuses? Mental arithmetic. Memorisation of poetry. Latin. Logic as a formal subject. Map reading. Knot work. The keeping of a commonplace book. The reading aloud of long passages in class. Singing in parts. What was each of those actually building in the child, beneath the surface of the lesson, and whose interest was served by its disappearance?
0:10

They did not take cursive from the schools because children no longer needed it. They took it because of what it was quietly building in them. Consider what the exercise actually is. A child, six years old, is handed a pen and asked to draw a single unbroken line that becomes a word. The wrist must float. The fingers must hold a living pressure, never quite the same twice, always correcting. The eye must follow the ink forward and trust the hand to finish what it has begun. There is no lifting, no stopping, no starting over mid-word. The loop must close. The ascender must rise and return. The sentence must travel from one margin to the other as a single continuous gesture, and at the end of it the hand must still be steady. Twelve years of this. Every day. Ten thousand small acts of sustained, self-correcting attention, carried out below the level of conscious thought, until the motion belongs to the body and the body belongs to the motion. This is not penmanship. It is the slow construction of an interior form. The hand that has learned to carry a line without breaking it is the hand of a mind that has learned to carry a thought without breaking it. The two are not metaphors for one another. They are the same faculty, trained in the same child, by the same daily discipline. Continuity of the stroke becomes continuity of the reasoning. The patience of the loop becomes the patience of the argument. The commitment to finish a word one has started becomes the commitment to finish a sentence, a paragraph, a life's idea, without reaching for the nearest distraction halfway through. Print is a different creature entirely. Print lifts. Print stops. Print assembles a word out of separate, stamped, interchangeable pieces, each one beginning and ending in isolation. A mind raised only on print learns to think the way print is made, in discrete tokens, in replaceable units, in fragments that can be recombined by any outside hand without the owner noticing the substitution. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model produces. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model can steer. Cursive is kata. This is the whole of it. A form repeated daily, for years, not for the sake of the form but for what the repetition lays down in the practitioner beneath the form. The swordsman does not train kata so that one day he may fight in kata. He trains it so that when the moment comes and there is no time to think, the movement is already inside him, older and deeper than thought, and it rises on its own. Cursive was the kata of the literate mind, the daily quiet drilling of continuity, of patience, of a line held steady under the long pressure of its own length. And the signature it produced at the end, that small flourished mark unique to a single human being on earth, was only the outward proof of an inward form no machine and no other hand could ever reproduce. Take the kata away and the practitioner is left with vocabulary in place of faculty. He can recognise a whole thought when he encounters one. He cannot carry one himself. He can admire a finished argument. He cannot sustain one long enough to close its loop. He begins books he does not finish, sentences he does not end, ideas he abandons the moment the screen in his palm offers him a brighter one. And when the machine begins feeding him tokens in the exact shape his schooling taught him to receive, he meets it with no interior resistance at all, because no interior form was ever built in him to push back with. They removed it quietly, across a generation, and they removed it in the last years before the machines arrived. Twelve years of daily practice in unbroken, embodied, self-authored thought, gone from the curriculum of almost every child in the Western world, just as the instruments designed to complete their sentences for them came online. The hand forgets. The mind, having never been taught the kata, forgets a thing it never knew it had. That is what cursive was. That is what was taken. And that is why the thought of anyone who still writes by hand, in long unlifted lines, remains, quietly, stubbornly, and without their ever needing to announce it, their own. Now the question stands open. What else has been banned, phased out, quietly retired from the curriculum and from common life over these same decades, under the same soft excuses? Mental arithmetic. Memorisation of poetry. Latin. Logic as a formal subject. Map reading. Knot work. The keeping of a commonplace book. The reading aloud of long passages in class. Singing in parts. What was each of those actually building in the child, beneath the surface of the lesson, and whose interest was served by its disappearance?

SiriusB

443,703 views • 4 months ago

🚨 WHY AREN’T MORE PEOPLE TRYING TO SOLVE MATH’S GREATEST MYSTERY? Because some mathematicians believe humanity may not yet have the mathematics required to solve it. The Riemann Hypothesis is a 166-year-old unsolved problem tied to prime numbers — the hidden numerical structures underlying mathematics itself. And solving it could transform: • cryptography • quantum physics • computing • chaos theory • our understanding of mathematical order The strange part? The hypothesis suggests all the hidden “zeros” of the zeta function align along a single invisible line in higher-dimensional mathematics. And despite over a century of effort… nobody knows why. Some of the world’s greatest mathematicians openly admit they don’t even know where to begin. The deeper implication is unsettling: Reality may contain structures so deep… humanity still lacks the language needed to describe them. What if the greatest mysteries in the universe… aren’t hidden in space… …but hidden in mathematics itself?
0:10

🚨 WHY AREN’T MORE PEOPLE TRYING TO SOLVE MATH’S GREATEST MYSTERY? Because some mathematicians believe humanity may not yet have the mathematics required to solve it. The Riemann Hypothesis is a 166-year-old unsolved problem tied to prime numbers — the hidden numerical structures underlying mathematics itself. And solving it could transform: • cryptography • quantum physics • computing • chaos theory • our understanding of mathematical order The strange part? The hypothesis suggests all the hidden “zeros” of the zeta function align along a single invisible line in higher-dimensional mathematics. And despite over a century of effort… nobody knows why. Some of the world’s greatest mathematicians openly admit they don’t even know where to begin. The deeper implication is unsettling: Reality may contain structures so deep… humanity still lacks the language needed to describe them. What if the greatest mysteries in the universe… aren’t hidden in space… …but hidden in mathematics itself?

TheNewPhysics

14,157 views • 3 months ago