Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

BREAKING: Europe is quietly killing encryption. And they keep changing the excuse to do it. The EU tried a mass-scanning law in April. Rejected. Within days they replaced it with mandatory age verification. Different name. Same surveillance. The UK went further. A draft law that scans your phone before...

49,334 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 This should alarm every single Canadian. In committee, Apple and Google just warned MPs exactly what Bill C-22 does. They said the bill doesn’t just ask them to unlock encryption when needed. It lets the government issue **secret ministerial orders** forcing them to build a “hole in the wall” — a backdoor — that didn’t exist before. Apple: “We’re concerned about a hole being put in the wall.” Liberals: “There’s no hole in the wall.” Apple: “But the bill lets you secretly order one.” Google: “We’ve never built anything like this, anywhere in the world.” And the response? Basically “pinky promise we won’t abuse it.” This isn’t some conspiracy theory. This is tech companies that fight governments for a living telling Parliament that C-22 would force them to do something unprecedented globally — create secret backdoors and comply with sweeping, unchecked ministerial orders on metadata, encryption, and more. After C-11 gave them control over what you can see and say online, C-22 is coming for what you can keep private. Law-abiding Canadians. Your texts. Your calls. Your data. Your location. Your searches. All of it potentially accessible through secret orders with minimal real oversight. Privacy isn’t optional. Encryption protects everyone — including the people who have nothing to hide. If this passes in its current form, Canada becomes a place where the government can quietly demand tech companies build tools to spy on its own citizens… and the companies are saying they’ve never been forced to do this anywhere else on Earth. That’s not “lawful access.” That’s the foundation of a surveillance state. Wake up. This one actually matters. #BillC22 #C22 #LawfulAccessAct #CanadaPrivacy #SurveillanceState #Encryption #cdnpoli

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

76,738 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Whitney Webb breaks down the coordinated global push for a new, dystopian system of control, marrying digital ID with CBDCs. This isn't conspiracy; it's all in their own documentation. They are building a full-spectrum digital cage, and its two locked doors are Digital Identity and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). You cannot have one without the other. The plan is to replace your government-issued ID with a Digital ID, but it's not just a card in your phone. It is fundamentally built upon your immutable biometrics: your fingerprints, the precise structure of your face, the unique pattern of your iris. This biometric data is the key. It is the hard link that ties your physical body directly to your digital identity credential. Your very body becomes your password. The reason this is so critical for them is the financial system. UN & Bank for International Settlements docs overtly state that Digital ID and CBDCs are designed to be integrated. The system cannot exist without this biometric digital ID. Why? Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols. For this new digital financial system to function, they must absolutely "know" every single participant. Your digital wallet will be tied to your digital ID, which is mapped to your biometrics. Total financial-biological linkage. We see the prototypes being rolled out now: • Sam Altman's WorldCoin lures people to scan their irises for a "unique identifier" and a digital wallet. This is the exact model. • The UN's "Building Blocks" program forces refugees to scan their iris at checkout to receive food rations. The value is deducted from a wallet tied to that biometric ID. They justify this total surveillance under the guise of closing the "identity gap," claiming the world's poor need digital IDs to access essential services like banking and healthcare. The reality? This is the ultimate onboarding mechanism into a system of programmable control, where your access to society and your own money is permissioned and revocable based on your compliance. This is the bedrock of the new global financial system. It is not about convenience. It is about control. Your body is the new currency, and they are forcing you to hand over the keys.

Camus

312,557 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Norway flew its own chefs and a half-ton of food to the World Cup in America. The headlines told you it was because the team thinks American food is poison. That part is not true. Their head chef said it plainly. They brought salmon, halibut, brown cheese, and pressed their juice from local oranges, for dietary consistency and a taste of home. Not a boycott. But the story put a spotlight on something that is true and documented. The US food supply runs on thousands of additives. A lot of them were never independently tested, and a long list of them are banned or restricted in Europe. Your sandwich bread can contain azodicarbonamide, a dough conditioner that is illegal in the EU and the UK. It is in the buns, the bagels, and the fresh-baked loaves here. Some American oranges are dyed with Citrus Red 2, a petroleum dye allowed on the peel and rated a possible carcinogen. The color you read as ripe can be painted on. Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6. In Europe, foods with these dyes carry a warning that they may affect activity and attention in children. In America, no warning, no label, just brighter cereal. This is not an accident. It is the law. In Europe a chemical has to be proven safe before it goes in your food. In America it stays in your food until somebody proves it dangerous. Same brands, same packaging, different recipe, because Europe makes them reformulate and we do not. You do not need a private chef and a cargo plane. You need to read the label. Cut the sugar and the grains and most of this stuff disappears on its own. Real food does not come with an ingredient list you cannot pronounce.

Vinnie Tortorich

72,090 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The EU is poised to enact a digital dictatorship in the name of child protection. On October 14th, the EU Council votes on the so-called "Chat Control" proposal, and its implications are nothing short of totalitarian. As Alice Weidel powerfully argues, this regulation is not about safety; it is a comprehensive attack on civil liberties. It represents the factual abolition of digital privacy, systematically dismantling the core principles of a free society. Here is what this legislation truly means: - The End of Private Communication: This is the modern-day equivalent of having every single letter you write opened, photographed, and scanned by an anonymous super-authority. The secret letter is dead. - The Death of Encryption: The regulation effectively eliminates end-to-end encryption, enabling the automated mass surveillance of every private message, image, and video on your personal devices. Every citizen is placed under general suspicion. - A Pretext for Control: The fight against child abuse is a "cheap pretext." As the German Child Protection Association confirms, the random scanning of private communication is a deep intrusion into the privacy of everyone, especially children. Criminals will simply move to unmonitored platforms, leaving only law-abiding citizens exposed. - The Inevitable Mission Creep: Once this infrastructure is in place, the scope will expand. Today, it's "child sexual abuse material"; tomorrow, it will be "hate speech," political dissent, and any content deemed undesirable by the state. This is the blueprint for a digital dictatorship. The resistance is growing. Signal threatens to leave the EU, while hundreds of scientists, lawyers, and IT experts warn of an uncontrollable data moloch. This is the final stand for our digital sovereignty. We must not allow supranational bureaucracies to degrade free citizens into surveilled puppets. The time to oppose this totalitarian project is now.

Camus

53,236 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Matthew Walker says the problem with waking at 4 a.m. is knowing it's 4 a.m. "How do you know it's four o'clock in the morning?" "That's your problem. You're looking at the clock." "And knowing that it's 3:15 or 4 a.m. in the morning does you no favors at all. It's not going to change the outcome." "So the first recommendation is remove all clock faces from the bedroom." "It's okay to, if you really must do, keep your phone next to your bed, but keep it out of sight, even though I would strongly recommend that you keep your phone in the kitchen." "Or even better still, a friend of mine recommended recently, just put it in the garage, put it in your car, in the garage." "And that way, the amount of motivation effort to go and get your phone within the first 10 minutes of the morning is very, very high, meaning you're probably not going to do it." "So let's baby steps. Let's just say crawl, walk, run. First thing to do, just make sure you can't see any clock faces." "And if you wake up, resist the urge, because as soon as you start doing that night after night, you're actually training your brain, reinforcing it to wake up at 3:15 in the morning." I used to treat checking the time as neutral information. Walker's point is that it is the trigger: you wake up fine, one glance, and now you are doing math about the alarm and how tired tomorrow will be. If he is also right about the training, the reliability of your 3:15 is the evidence, and a rehearsed loop is one you can interrupt. - Matthew Walker (Dr. Matthew Walker) on On Purpose with Jay Shetty (Jay Shetty)

Jay McHale

17,231 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce