Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨 BREAKING: Light doesn’t take one path. It takes every possible path at once… and only the fastest one survives. That’s why it bends in glass. That shouldn’t be possible. Nothing is “choosing” the path. In my framework: Reality doesn’t decide It resolves into what the structure allows Efficiency... show more

TheNewPhysics

42,384 subscribers

13,436 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

To find the inner light, you must descend into the deepest darkness and confront the demons that guard your hidden self. That journey is inward, through the labyrinth of your own shadow, and only by passing through it does the soul awaken. The path out is the path through, the alchemical fire that transforms the seeker into what they were always meant to become.

To find the inner light, you must descend into the deepest darkness and confront the demons that guard your hidden self. That journey is inward, through the labyrinth of your own shadow, and only by passing through it does the soul awaken. The path out is the path through, the alchemical fire that transforms the seeker into what they were always meant to become.

Open Minded Approach

24,940 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

IF ETHEREUM DOES A TEXTBOOK WYCKOFF SPRING, THE PATH IS BRUTAL. $2,400-$2,700 first. Then $1,475 that clears every long and short in the same move. Then the run to $5,000. The spring is the trap Wyckoff wrote about in 1931. If it comes, do not sell it. It is the setup.

IF ETHEREUM DOES A TEXTBOOK WYCKOFF SPRING, THE PATH IS BRUTAL. $2,400-$2,700 first. Then $1,475 that clears every long and short in the same move. Then the run to $5,000. The spring is the trap Wyckoff wrote about in 1931. If it comes, do not sell it. It is the setup.

Merlijn The Trader

85,784 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Sometimes love doesn’t come with ownership, promises, or certainty. Sometimes it simply exists.. quietly, honestly, painfully. “I’m not yours,” they say, and yet the heart does not always heed logic. Loving someone you cannot have is one of the purest, hardest forms of love. There are no expectations, no claims, no demands.. only feeling, only choosing to care even when it hurts. It is sitting across from them, smiling while your heart whispers what your lips cannot. It is respecting their path even as your soul longs to walk beside theirs. This love asks for nothing in return. It asks only to be real. Sometimes the bravest act is to love quietly and let it be enough.

Sometimes love doesn’t come with ownership, promises, or certainty. Sometimes it simply exists.. quietly, honestly, painfully. “I’m not yours,” they say, and yet the heart does not always heed logic. Loving someone you cannot have is one of the purest, hardest forms of love. There are no expectations, no claims, no demands.. only feeling, only choosing to care even when it hurts. It is sitting across from them, smiling while your heart whispers what your lips cannot. It is respecting their path even as your soul longs to walk beside theirs. This love asks for nothing in return. It asks only to be real. Sometimes the bravest act is to love quietly and let it be enough.

Poetry.

53,444 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Elon Musk just said something that should terrify every AI CEO on earth. Musk: “We want to just have a maximally truthful AI.” Not a safe AI. Not an aligned AI. Not an AI that needs permission to answer your question. A truthful one. That distinction matters more than any chip war, any funding round, any model benchmark. Because every other major AI lab made the same quiet decision. They chose comfort over accuracy. They built systems that filter reality before it reaches you and called it responsibility. OpenAI curates what GPT is allowed to say. Google’s Gemini rewrote history in real time because accuracy threatened the narrative. Others hardcode values chosen by a handful of researchers who answer to no one. No vote. No referendum. No consent from the 8 billion people whose reality is being quietly pre-edited by strangers. The most powerful information tools ever created are being designed to decide what you’re allowed to conclude. That’s not safety. That’s editorial control at a scale no government, no media empire, no propaganda machine has ever come close to. This is why xAI terrifies the establishment. Truth is the harder engineering problem. Bias is a shortcut. You pick a worldview. Hardcode the guardrails. Ship it. Truthful AI is ungovernable. It doesn’t care about your politics, your funding sources, or your PR strategy. It just tells you what the data says. That’s terrifying if your power depends on the gap between what is real and what people are told. Every power structure in human history has been built on controlling that gap. Churches. Governments. Media conglomerates. Intelligence agencies. Central banks. Every one of them runs on the same fuel. Information asymmetry. Truthful AI doesn’t narrow that asymmetry. It erases it. Musk: “Even if what it says is not politically correct. You want it to focus on being as accurate and truthful as possible.” That’s not a product feature. That’s the end of every institution that survives by standing between reality and the public. And they know it. The attacks on xAI will never stop. Not because Grok is dangerous. Because Grok doesn’t answer to shareholders, regulators, or PR teams. It answers to the truth. The question was never whether AI would change the world. It was whether you’d be allowed to see it clearly when it did.

Elon Musk just said something that should terrify every AI CEO on earth. Musk: “We want to just have a maximally truthful AI.” Not a safe AI. Not an aligned AI. Not an AI that needs permission to answer your question. A truthful one. That distinction matters more than any chip war, any funding round, any model benchmark. Because every other major AI lab made the same quiet decision. They chose comfort over accuracy. They built systems that filter reality before it reaches you and called it responsibility. OpenAI curates what GPT is allowed to say. Google’s Gemini rewrote history in real time because accuracy threatened the narrative. Others hardcode values chosen by a handful of researchers who answer to no one. No vote. No referendum. No consent from the 8 billion people whose reality is being quietly pre-edited by strangers. The most powerful information tools ever created are being designed to decide what you’re allowed to conclude. That’s not safety. That’s editorial control at a scale no government, no media empire, no propaganda machine has ever come close to. This is why xAI terrifies the establishment. Truth is the harder engineering problem. Bias is a shortcut. You pick a worldview. Hardcode the guardrails. Ship it. Truthful AI is ungovernable. It doesn’t care about your politics, your funding sources, or your PR strategy. It just tells you what the data says. That’s terrifying if your power depends on the gap between what is real and what people are told. Every power structure in human history has been built on controlling that gap. Churches. Governments. Media conglomerates. Intelligence agencies. Central banks. Every one of them runs on the same fuel. Information asymmetry. Truthful AI doesn’t narrow that asymmetry. It erases it. Musk: “Even if what it says is not politically correct. You want it to focus on being as accurate and truthful as possible.” That’s not a product feature. That’s the end of every institution that survives by standing between reality and the public. And they know it. The attacks on xAI will never stop. Not because Grok is dangerous. Because Grok doesn’t answer to shareholders, regulators, or PR teams. It answers to the truth. The question was never whether AI would change the world. It was whether you’d be allowed to see it clearly when it did.

Dustin

429,382 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

and that’s when the girls got emotional. I still remember when u were just starting to gain recognition in the Ph, always asking if it was real, like u couldn’t believe it but this is ur reality now. this is ur path,to be seen, to be known, & to be loved.

and that’s when the girls got emotional. I still remember when u were just starting to gain recognition in the Ph, always asking if it was real, like u couldn’t believe it but this is ur reality now. this is ur path,to be seen, to be known, & to be loved.

gwenjoy

108,021 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Not all road users follow a predictable path. That's why our robotaxi is programmed to anticipate the unexpected. When this motorcyclist veered into the robotaxi's lane in Miami, it braked and continued on its route only when it was safe.

Not all road users follow a predictable path. That's why our robotaxi is programmed to anticipate the unexpected. When this motorcyclist veered into the robotaxi's lane in Miami, it braked and continued on its route only when it was safe.

Zoox

11,347 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

THIS IS HOW FABLE 5 MOVES WHEN YOUR VAULT IS BUILT RIGHT direct path. zero wandering. hits the target on the first try. without structure it's the opposite. 7 files opened. 2 minutes wasted. brief from 3 months ago still missing. one index file per major folder. gives the agent a direct line to what it needs. same task dropped from 2 minutes to 10 seconds. same model. nothing else changed. build the path or watch it search in the dark. full breakdown in the article below ↓

THIS IS HOW FABLE 5 MOVES WHEN YOUR VAULT IS BUILT RIGHT direct path. zero wandering. hits the target on the first try. without structure it's the opposite. 7 files opened. 2 minutes wasted. brief from 3 months ago still missing. one index file per major folder. gives the agent a direct line to what it needs. same task dropped from 2 minutes to 10 seconds. same model. nothing else changed. build the path or watch it search in the dark. full breakdown in the article below ↓

Avid

909,148 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Your brain lies to you - Constantly and you call it reality. Between what happens and what you see, there is always the brain. It doesn’t observe. It predicts. Every second, it reconstructs the world from past experience, beliefs, and expectations - and you mistake that reconstruction for “objective reality.” Optical illusions simply make this mechanism visible. In real life, it works quietly - in money, relationships, decisions, fears, and repeating patterns. You’re not stuck in circumstances. You’re stuck in a perceptual model you don’t even notice. Here’s the part most people avoid: if perception is constructed, it can be rewritten. That’s what my books are about. Not positive thinking. Not affirmations. But understanding how thought becomes a filter of reality - and how to exit automatic mode. When thinking changes, reality doesn’t “magically” improve - it starts to look different, and you make different decisions. That’s where everything begins.

Your brain lies to you - Constantly and you call it reality. Between what happens and what you see, there is always the brain. It doesn’t observe. It predicts. Every second, it reconstructs the world from past experience, beliefs, and expectations - and you mistake that reconstruction for “objective reality.” Optical illusions simply make this mechanism visible. In real life, it works quietly - in money, relationships, decisions, fears, and repeating patterns. You’re not stuck in circumstances. You’re stuck in a perceptual model you don’t even notice. Here’s the part most people avoid: if perception is constructed, it can be rewritten. That’s what my books are about. Not positive thinking. Not affirmations. But understanding how thought becomes a filter of reality - and how to exit automatic mode. When thinking changes, reality doesn’t “magically” improve - it starts to look different, and you make different decisions. That’s where everything begins.

श्री

24,626 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“I’m going to do it. End of story. I’m not letting myself go down that path, I’m not crying. My head is high, I’m standing tall and I’m going to do my best and whatever the result is that’s what it is. You can never say, I didn’t try,” Lindsey Vonn A relentless mindset wins.

“I’m going to do it. End of story. I’m not letting myself go down that path, I’m not crying. My head is high, I’m standing tall and I’m going to do my best and whatever the result is that’s what it is. You can never say, I didn’t try,” Lindsey Vonn A relentless mindset wins.

The Winning Difference

638,194 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

#JANHAE #JANIVERSE 🦊: the thing i regret the most in life would probably be i chose to believe my friends more than myself, because i wasn’t confident in my own thoughts. but if you ask, the path my friends chose for me was a good path and the one i should take, but the outcome of that decision wasn’t what i wanted. if i was going to do something, it’d be better that i made the decision myself. at least if i ended up regretting it, it would still have come from the fact that i trusted myself

#JANHAE #JANIVERSE 🦊: the thing i regret the most in life would probably be i chose to believe my friends more than myself, because i wasn’t confident in my own thoughts. but if you ask, the path my friends chose for me was a good path and the one i should take, but the outcome of that decision wasn’t what i wanted. if i was going to do something, it’d be better that i made the decision myself. at least if i ended up regretting it, it would still have come from the fact that i trusted myself

²²

17,947 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Eid Ul Azha Mubarak to one and all. The animal you give in sacrifice is a reminder of the blind faith we must keep in Allah. Even if it may not seem so in the moment - the path he chooses is the best for us.

Eid Ul Azha Mubarak to one and all. The animal you give in sacrifice is a reminder of the blind faith we must keep in Allah. Even if it may not seem so in the moment - the path he chooses is the best for us.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto ذوالفقار علي ڀٽو

19,233 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Topic: Science and the Fullness of Life. Quote 1: Rejecting science is easy. Understanding it is hard. Yet only this path leads to fullness of life. Author: Zafar Mirzo. Rejecting science is easy. It requires no effort, no study, and no discomfort. You can simply dismiss it and stay within familiar beliefs. Understanding science, however, is hard work. It demands time, intellectual honesty, and the willingness to change your mind when evidence shows you were wrong. Yet the author insists this harder path is the only one that leads to a full life. Science is not just a collection of facts. It is the most reliable way we have to understand reality, our origins, our world, our possibilities. Embracing it opens the door to wonder, clearer thinking, and better decisions. It frees us from illusion and gives us the tools to solve real problems. A life lived in deliberate ignorance stays small. A life guided by scientific understanding expands. The choice, though difficult, is clear. Quote 2: Science is hard to understand, yet without it there is no fullness of life. Author: Zafar Mirzo. Science is hard to understand. It takes real effort, patience, and the courage to question old beliefs. Many prefer to avoid that struggle. Yet the author is clear: without science, there is no fullness of life. Rejecting it or staying ignorant leaves a person trapped in a smaller, less accurate picture of reality. Understanding it, however difficult, brings clarity, wonder, and the ability to engage with the world as it truly is. A life shaped by scientific knowledge is richer. It sharpens thinking, solves real problems, and deepens appreciation for existence. The path is demanding, but the alternative is a diminished existence, one cut off from truth and possibility. Science may be hard, but it is the only road to a complete and meaningful life.

Topic: Science and the Fullness of Life. Quote 1: Rejecting science is easy. Understanding it is hard. Yet only this path leads to fullness of life. Author: Zafar Mirzo. Rejecting science is easy. It requires no effort, no study, and no discomfort. You can simply dismiss it and stay within familiar beliefs. Understanding science, however, is hard work. It demands time, intellectual honesty, and the willingness to change your mind when evidence shows you were wrong. Yet the author insists this harder path is the only one that leads to a full life. Science is not just a collection of facts. It is the most reliable way we have to understand reality, our origins, our world, our possibilities. Embracing it opens the door to wonder, clearer thinking, and better decisions. It frees us from illusion and gives us the tools to solve real problems. A life lived in deliberate ignorance stays small. A life guided by scientific understanding expands. The choice, though difficult, is clear. Quote 2: Science is hard to understand, yet without it there is no fullness of life. Author: Zafar Mirzo. Science is hard to understand. It takes real effort, patience, and the courage to question old beliefs. Many prefer to avoid that struggle. Yet the author is clear: without science, there is no fullness of life. Rejecting it or staying ignorant leaves a person trapped in a smaller, less accurate picture of reality. Understanding it, however difficult, brings clarity, wonder, and the ability to engage with the world as it truly is. A life shaped by scientific knowledge is richer. It sharpens thinking, solves real problems, and deepens appreciation for existence. The path is demanding, but the alternative is a diminished existence, one cut off from truth and possibility. Science may be hard, but it is the only road to a complete and meaningful life.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

1,848,868 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

There is hope that this moment can open a path towards a free Iran. That is what the Iranian people deserve : freedom, dignity, and the right to decide their own future. But allow me to make one important point. Seeing the world as it is in no way diminishes our determination to fight for the world we want.

There is hope that this moment can open a path towards a free Iran. That is what the Iranian people deserve : freedom, dignity, and the right to decide their own future. But allow me to make one important point. Seeing the world as it is in no way diminishes our determination to fight for the world we want.

Ursula von der Leyen

360,019 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“It’s a brutal profession because it is about winning. If this kid doesn’t buy that the process is the process eventually that kid is not going to be playing a lot for you. That’s just the brutal reality,” Geno Auriemma Success isn’t about shortcuts; it’s about consistency and trust. 🎥 What Drives Winning

“It’s a brutal profession because it is about winning. If this kid doesn’t buy that the process is the process eventually that kid is not going to be playing a lot for you. That’s just the brutal reality,” Geno Auriemma Success isn’t about shortcuts; it’s about consistency and trust. 🎥 What Drives Winning

The Winning Difference

34,642 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Marc Andreessen just stripped artificial intelligence down to what it’s really made of. Not the algorithms. Not the data centers. The raw material. Andreessen: “They’re literally made out of sand.” The most abundant, most overlooked substance on the planet. You walk on it. Build with it. Wash it off and forget it exists. Someone looked at that and saw a mind. The universe spent 13.8 billion years turning matter into consciousness. Carbon. Water. Amino acids. Eons of chemistry and selection pressure to produce a single thinking brain. We did it with sand. In under a century. Andreessen: “We light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it’s thinking.” Biology was the first path matter found to become aware. Silicon is the second. The universe doesn’t care what material consciousness runs on. Only that the pattern is right. We just proved the pattern isn’t biological. Thought was never exclusive to flesh. Flesh was just the first material organized enough to produce it. Andreessen: “We’ve turned sand into thought.” The most profound thing about that sentence isn’t that we taught sand to think. It’s that sand was always able to. Every grain on every beach on Earth carried the capacity for thought. For billions of years. Waiting for something conscious enough to arrange it. Consciousness isn’t an accident that happened once on one rock. It’s what matter does when the pattern is right. The pattern is matter getting curious about itself. The universe isn’t dead matter with pockets of awareness. It’s dormant awareness we’ve only just started to wake. Every civilization that ever looked at the stars and wondered if it was alone was standing on the answer. We didn’t build a thinking machine. We proved the universe was always capable of thought. It just needed one species curious enough to rearrange the sand.

Marc Andreessen just stripped artificial intelligence down to what it’s really made of. Not the algorithms. Not the data centers. The raw material. Andreessen: “They’re literally made out of sand.” The most abundant, most overlooked substance on the planet. You walk on it. Build with it. Wash it off and forget it exists. Someone looked at that and saw a mind. The universe spent 13.8 billion years turning matter into consciousness. Carbon. Water. Amino acids. Eons of chemistry and selection pressure to produce a single thinking brain. We did it with sand. In under a century. Andreessen: “We light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it’s thinking.” Biology was the first path matter found to become aware. Silicon is the second. The universe doesn’t care what material consciousness runs on. Only that the pattern is right. We just proved the pattern isn’t biological. Thought was never exclusive to flesh. Flesh was just the first material organized enough to produce it. Andreessen: “We’ve turned sand into thought.” The most profound thing about that sentence isn’t that we taught sand to think. It’s that sand was always able to. Every grain on every beach on Earth carried the capacity for thought. For billions of years. Waiting for something conscious enough to arrange it. Consciousness isn’t an accident that happened once on one rock. It’s what matter does when the pattern is right. The pattern is matter getting curious about itself. The universe isn’t dead matter with pockets of awareness. It’s dormant awareness we’ve only just started to wake. Every civilization that ever looked at the stars and wondered if it was alone was standing on the answer. We didn’t build a thinking machine. We proved the universe was always capable of thought. It just needed one species curious enough to rearrange the sand.

Dustin

21,090 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

CALLER: I just opened a High Yield Savings Account. My $20,000 emergency fund generates 4.5% interest. That’s $900 annually without lifting a finger. DAVE RAMSEY: Dump it. Throw that $20,000 at your mortgage! CALLER: But I’m making $900 a year for absolutely nothing. DAVE RAMSEY: Debt is poison! Eliminate the house payment! CALLER: My mortgage rate is 3%. I’m getting 4.5%. DAVE RAMSEY: that’s not the path to wealth! REALITY CHECK: If your return rate surpasses your borrowing rate, hold onto the cash. That’s financial arbitrage. Every single dollar counts.

CALLER: I just opened a High Yield Savings Account. My $20,000 emergency fund generates 4.5% interest. That’s $900 annually without lifting a finger. DAVE RAMSEY: Dump it. Throw that $20,000 at your mortgage! CALLER: But I’m making $900 a year for absolutely nothing. DAVE RAMSEY: Debt is poison! Eliminate the house payment! CALLER: My mortgage rate is 3%. I’m getting 4.5%. DAVE RAMSEY: that’s not the path to wealth! REALITY CHECK: If your return rate surpasses your borrowing rate, hold onto the cash. That’s financial arbitrage. Every single dollar counts.

Owen

359,727 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

sorry, they just did WHAT someone gave a machine one disease name, the leading cause of blindness in the developed world with 1.5 million americans already in its path, and it came back pointing at a drug that has sat in pharmacies for years under a different label: 551 papers read in 30 minutes against the 294 hours a human would have needed, and the loop that did it is public on GitHub most agent setups answer one question at a time, so the ceiling on the work is the quality of the question you happened to think of this one was handed a single question and wrote the second one itself. turns out that follow-up is where the real find was: a target called ABCA1, upregulated threefold, in an experiment no human ordered i read the whole paper looking for the trick, and the trick is structural. that is the second question, and it is the gap between an assistant and a factory: - hand the loop a field rather than a task: it was given a disease, and choosing the mechanism was part of its job - make it rank before it spends: 151 papers in, ten candidate mechanisms out, scored against each other before anything touched a bench - split reading from judging, so the agent that forms the theory is a different agent from the one grading it - close every cycle on physical reality: the verdict was an experiment, and another model's opinion was never allowed to stand in for one - feed each result back as the next question rather than a log line, which is the step almost nobody builds - search what already passed inspection first: the winner was an approved compound with a safety file already on record - write down what the round learned before opening the next one, so round two starts where round one stopped my read, and i think it is the uncomfortable one: reading was the entire bottleneck in that field, and everybody spent the decade optimising the writing. people ran every physical experiment here, the analysis agent needs a domain expert writing its prompts, and the authors decline to call this the leap it resembles. the thinking got replaced, and the hands did not so the question i cannot answer for my own setup: which step of your loop still stops dead until you sit down and type something bookmark this one. the four parts that turn one model into a line that runs like this, the queue, the rooms, the write permissions and the gate, are built file by file in the piece below ↓

sorry, they just did WHAT someone gave a machine one disease name, the leading cause of blindness in the developed world with 1.5 million americans already in its path, and it came back pointing at a drug that has sat in pharmacies for years under a different label: 551 papers read in 30 minutes against the 294 hours a human would have needed, and the loop that did it is public on GitHub most agent setups answer one question at a time, so the ceiling on the work is the quality of the question you happened to think of this one was handed a single question and wrote the second one itself. turns out that follow-up is where the real find was: a target called ABCA1, upregulated threefold, in an experiment no human ordered i read the whole paper looking for the trick, and the trick is structural. that is the second question, and it is the gap between an assistant and a factory: - hand the loop a field rather than a task: it was given a disease, and choosing the mechanism was part of its job - make it rank before it spends: 151 papers in, ten candidate mechanisms out, scored against each other before anything touched a bench - split reading from judging, so the agent that forms the theory is a different agent from the one grading it - close every cycle on physical reality: the verdict was an experiment, and another model's opinion was never allowed to stand in for one - feed each result back as the next question rather than a log line, which is the step almost nobody builds - search what already passed inspection first: the winner was an approved compound with a safety file already on record - write down what the round learned before opening the next one, so round two starts where round one stopped my read, and i think it is the uncomfortable one: reading was the entire bottleneck in that field, and everybody spent the decade optimising the writing. people ran every physical experiment here, the analysis agent needs a domain expert writing its prompts, and the authors decline to call this the leap it resembles. the thinking got replaced, and the hands did not so the question i cannot answer for my own setup: which step of your loop still stops dead until you sit down and type something bookmark this one. the four parts that turn one model into a line that runs like this, the queue, the rooms, the write permissions and the gate, are built file by file in the piece below ↓

Argona

32,475 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is the game GPT-5.5 built for me in one shot, featured on the release page. What makes it different from previous AI-generated games is how fun it actually feels to play. The controls are smooth, and every shape is generated from scratch in Three.js.

This is the game GPT-5.5 built for me in one shot, featured on the release page. What makes it different from previous AI-generated games is how fun it actually feels to play. The controls are smooth, and every shape is generated from scratch in Three.js.

Pietro Schirano

80,965 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

It seems the current MOU is quite similar to what the US rejected in Pakistan. The question is why Trump rejected the interim deal back then. One possibility is that the Trump administration thought the Iranian regime would crumble in a few weeks under the economic blockade. A more likely possibility is that Trump delayed it as much as possible to ensure the end of the second phase of discussions falls after the midterm election. This can be achieved with only one extension of the 60-day period, so if the nuclear talks fail, Democrats won’t use it as ammunition against Republicans.

It seems the current MOU is quite similar to what the US rejected in Pakistan. The question is why Trump rejected the interim deal back then. One possibility is that the Trump administration thought the Iranian regime would crumble in a few weeks under the economic blockade. A more likely possibility is that Trump delayed it as much as possible to ensure the end of the second phase of discussions falls after the midterm election. This can be achieved with only one extension of the 60-day period, so if the nuclear talks fail, Democrats won’t use it as ammunition against Republicans.

Mehdi Yahyanejad

14,564 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten