Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 BREAKING Meetings just got an OS upgrade This AI doesn’t just “take notes” It does the work while you talk 🤯 Here’s what’s happening with Shadow: 1/ You join a meeting 2/ AI listens + understands context in real time 3/ Detects action items automatically 4/ Updates CRM...

13,580 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Meetings suck. AI makes them suck more. But not for the reasons you think. Nate B Jones talks about how you are destroying company value with meetings. Everybody is looking at AI as a way to cut team sizes, but this is also wrong: - Look back at your week, you probably spent 1/3 of your time in meetings. - Team sizes max at 5, every person after that has a cost in productivity (both personal and in communication co-ordination). - Up till now, we've been willing to pay the price of each additional person in a meeting (and each meeting) because we needed to get large orgs to co-ordinate or it's chaos. - The cost of lost productivity was worth it, because each person generates maybe 200-300k in company value. - But in the age of AI, each person using AI can be maybe 5-10x more productive. This means the cost of each person in a meeting is taking away not 200k in value, but 1M per person. - Every person you add to a meeting above 5 (and I would argue per meeting), is costing you 1 - 2 million dollars. It's not worth it, not by a little, by an order of magnitude. - The naive approach is to think this means you need less people and should fire everyone. This is the wrong framing. - The correct pattern is smaller team sizes, optimal at 5, where adding an additional person does not cost you 1-2M dollars. And then doing MORE with everyone else, also in smaller strike teams of 5. - You now have excess capacity, a fleet of aircraft carriers instead of fishing boats. - Your org need to reach for MORE, instead of trying to do the same job for less. You can reach more markets, higher complexity projects and generate more revenue. Think BIGGER, not "same company, less people." He's right, and game teams should think the same way.

Grummz

16,117 views • 5 months ago

This is not an AI tool. This is not an AI assistant. naïve is something the world has never seen before. Every AI product you've used until now made you better at doing the work, faster writing, faster coding, faster research. You were still doing the work. AI was just helping you do it quicker. Naive is a completely different category. You don't use Naive to do the work. You hire Naive to run the business. You describe what you want. Naive spins up a full team of AI employees and hands you a company that's already operating: 🤝 A sales rep booking meetings while you sleep 📈 An SEO manager publishing and ranking content on autopilot 💻 A full-stack engineer shipping production code without review 💰 A finance manager reconciling accounts and generating reports 🔍 A recruiting agent sourcing and reaching out to candidates 🎧 A support agent resolving tickets and tracking satisfaction scores Each employee has their own email inbox, bank account, phone number, legal entity, and compute environment. They never ask you for help. They share context, delegate tasks, and coordinate as a fully functioning team, extracting patterns from every outcome and getting smarter over time. You set a budget. You define the goal. You walk away. This is not productivity software. This is not a chatbot with a nice interface. This is a new category of company creation that did not exist until now. The numbers speak for themselves: ✅ Hundreds of founders already launched on the platform 📊 Active businesses growing 32% week over week ⚡ Tasks completed growing 42% week over week 💵 Real ARR being generated with zero human employees Every AI tool you've ever used made you a better worker. Naive makes you an owner. 👉 Launch your business today → #NaïveAI2B9YHR

Gina Acosta

24,008 views • 4 months ago

I built this Claude Cowork automation to handle a simple content marketing task that my team used to do daily. This frees up ~4 hours of time per week. At CoinLedger, every week we spend time repurposing pillar content (blog content) across various social networks (reddit, twitter, YouTube, IG, etc) We used to have a human + AI do this work. Now we just have AI doing it via this automation. Here's how the Claude automation works: → Scrapes any blog URL and extracts key insights → Transforms content into platform-specific posts (Reddit, Twitter, Instagram) → Automatically creates organized Google Docs for each piece → Updates our internal content tracking spreadsheet in real-time → Highlights completed tasks without any human oversight The game-changer? It runs completely in the background while I focus on higher-value strategic work. Now scale this up. All mundane, "virtual-assistant-style" work can be automated in this fashion. There is SO MUCH of this type of work in the real world. And there will be EVEN MORE of it when you can do it all for $100/mo. Here's the process you should follow: 1. Identify a simple, manual process that genuinely adds value to your company if you did it every single day 2. Build the skill / automation for Claude Code / Claude Cowork to do it 24/7 3. Refine 4. Unleash Claude 5. Repeat This could be list building for sales leads, scraping LinkedIn, identifying viral videos on TikTok that you can spin for your brand, research, and so so much more. Your imagination is the limit. But this type of work exists in all businesses. If you do this enough, you start to see why people have dozens of Claude instances running 24/7 on multiple devices. They have figured out ways for Claude to drive economically valuable work for their organizations. And now they are simply scaling up that work. Wild. This is where the world is quickly heading.

David Roberts

31,900 views • 7 months ago