Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BREAKING Trump says he is considering adding DC to national conceal carry, acknowledges that the best way to not become a victim is to practice the 2nd Amendment A welcome statement, but we can do even better by passing National constitutional carry!

TXGunRights's profile picture

Texas Gun Rights

27,661 subscribers

158,399 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.
5:49

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump wants to expand nationwide concealed carry to Washington DC, so residents can finally exercise the 2nd Amendment and be able to defend themselves from criminals. 👀👀
0:47

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump wants to expand nationwide concealed carry to Washington DC, so residents can finally exercise the 2nd Amendment and be able to defend themselves from criminals. 👀👀

Eric Daugherty

32,403 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Moses Kuria: Gachagua has every right to practice his politics in the best way he knows how as long as he is not contravening the law. This country does not belong to only politicians. We need to carry out our politics in a better way #CitizenExplainer
3:42

Moses Kuria: Gachagua has every right to practice his politics in the best way he knows how as long as he is not contravening the law. This country does not belong to only politicians. We need to carry out our politics in a better way #CitizenExplainer

Citizen TV Kenya

29,014 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

BREAKING: Nancy Pelosi says, "On January 6th, we begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it, And yet, in a contra-constitutional way, he has sent the National Guard into California. Something is very wrong with this picture."
4:37

BREAKING: Nancy Pelosi says, "On January 6th, we begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it, And yet, in a contra-constitutional way, he has sent the National Guard into California. Something is very wrong with this picture."

Simon Ateba

2,202,282 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Supreme Court’s ruling regarding concealed carry is a strong step forward in upholding 2nd Amendment & our constitutional right to defend ourselves.
3:08

The Supreme Court’s ruling regarding concealed carry is a strong step forward in upholding 2nd Amendment & our constitutional right to defend ourselves.

A Man Of Memes

203,124 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

BREAKING: Speaker Pelosi (D-CA) SLAMS Trump: “On January 6th...we begged (him) to send in the National Guard. He would not do it...And yet, in a contra-constitutional way, he has sent the National Guard into California. Something is very wrong with this picture." She’s right.
0:29

BREAKING: Speaker Pelosi (D-CA) SLAMS Trump: “On January 6th...we begged (him) to send in the National Guard. He would not do it...And yet, in a contra-constitutional way, he has sent the National Guard into California. Something is very wrong with this picture." She’s right.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

1,241,210 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mayor Brandon Johnson is having a fit because President Trump says he’ll deploy the National Guard to Chicago to save it like he did DC. Johnson says crime is down. He rightly has the worst approval of any US mayor ever. Chicago residents say, “We welcome the National Guard.”
1:28

Mayor Brandon Johnson is having a fit because President Trump says he’ll deploy the National Guard to Chicago to save it like he did DC. Johnson says crime is down. He rightly has the worst approval of any US mayor ever. Chicago residents say, “We welcome the National Guard.”

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

415,145 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

In a recent interview, President Trump reaffirmed his commitment to concealed carry reciprocity. "I'm in favor of it, people have to protect themselves. I'm a Second Amendment person." Call (202) 224-3121 and tell your elected officials to pass National Constitutional Carry Reciprocity now!
0:45

In a recent interview, President Trump reaffirmed his commitment to concealed carry reciprocity. "I'm in favor of it, people have to protect themselves. I'm a Second Amendment person." Call (202) 224-3121 and tell your elected officials to pass National Constitutional Carry Reciprocity now!

Gun Owners of America

244,930 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Trump in 2020: We have to go by the laws. We can't move in the National Guard. I can call insurrection but there's no reason to ever do that, even in a Portland case. We can't call in the National Guard unless we're requested by a governor.
0:23

Trump in 2020: We have to go by the laws. We can't move in the National Guard. I can call insurrection but there's no reason to ever do that, even in a Portland case. We can't call in the National Guard unless we're requested by a governor.

The Lincoln Project

259,132 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING Trump administeration retracts US National Intelligence's assesment on Pakistan's missile program. Defence Secretary says Pakistan's missile program is not a threat to the US, dismissing National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard's statement.
0:52

BREAKING Trump administeration retracts US National Intelligence's assesment on Pakistan's missile program. Defence Secretary says Pakistan's missile program is not a threat to the US, dismissing National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard's statement.

Kamran Yousaf

111,505 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BREAKING: Pres. Trump just announced that he is ready to activate the National Guard to stop the crime in DC. "We're going to we're going to do something about it... And that includes bringing in the National Guard, maybe very quickly too."
0:41

BREAKING: Pres. Trump just announced that he is ready to activate the National Guard to stop the crime in DC. "We're going to we're going to do something about it... And that includes bringing in the National Guard, maybe very quickly too."

George

31,142 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Top Trump cabinet member says that sending the National Guard to DC is a signal of "democracy in action"
0:28

Top Trump cabinet member says that sending the National Guard to DC is a signal of "democracy in action"

FactPost

12,871 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

President Trump tells reporter he is not going to do anything to violate the 2nd Amendment.
0:40

President Trump tells reporter he is not going to do anything to violate the 2nd Amendment.

Chad Harrison 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

1,649,124 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Brian O'Hara: "You have a 2nd Amendment right in the U.S. to possess a firearm. And there are some restrictions around that in Minnesota…He did not violate any of those restrictions. He is not a convicted felon. He is someone that did have a permit for the handgun to carry it."
1:59

Brian O'Hara: "You have a 2nd Amendment right in the U.S. to possess a firearm. And there are some restrictions around that in Minnesota…He did not violate any of those restrictions. He is not a convicted felon. He is someone that did have a permit for the handgun to carry it."

The Bulwark

106,354 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

•DC National Guard is preparing to carry weapons •U.S. Marshals continue to deputize D.C. National Guard members •Secret Service and DC Metro being deputized for warrantless arrests •SC & WV preparing to deploy National Guard to assist in DC ⚡️there is a storm coming.
1:13

•DC National Guard is preparing to carry weapons •U.S. Marshals continue to deputize D.C. National Guard members •Secret Service and DC Metro being deputized for warrantless arrests •SC & WV preparing to deploy National Guard to assist in DC ⚡️there is a storm coming.

ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

144,215 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: President Trump says he is considering deploying the National Guard to Portland in wake of ongoing riots at the ICE facility: "These are paid terrorists — If we go to Portland, we're going to wipe them out…They won't even stand the fight."
1:35

BREAKING: President Trump says he is considering deploying the National Guard to Portland in wake of ongoing riots at the ICE facility: "These are paid terrorists — If we go to Portland, we're going to wipe them out…They won't even stand the fight."

Katie Daviscourt 📸

411,048 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Trump: How do you feel about national right to carry. That's my free poll. I don't have to pay $300,000 to somebody that doesn't even do polling, you know, they give you a phony numbers. See, those are real numbers. National right to carry. Yeah, we're working on It
0:44

Trump: How do you feel about national right to carry. That's my free poll. I don't have to pay $300,000 to somebody that doesn't even do polling, you know, they give you a phony numbers. See, those are real numbers. National right to carry. Yeah, we're working on It

Acyn

47,939 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Paul: Virtually every meeting I go to in Kentucky, people wear their concealed carry, they wear their open carry. They have the constitutional right to carry. So if we're going to become the party that says: oh, you don't have a right to carry and you might just be shot…
0:41

Paul: Virtually every meeting I go to in Kentucky, people wear their concealed carry, they wear their open carry. They have the constitutional right to carry. So if we're going to become the party that says: oh, you don't have a right to carry and you might just be shot…

Acyn

310,114 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Pelosi: “On Jan. 6, we begged the president of the United States to send the National Guard. He would not do it.” “And yet, in a contra-constitutional way, he has sent the National Guard into California. Something is very wrong with this picture.”
1:36

Pelosi: “On Jan. 6, we begged the president of the United States to send the National Guard. He would not do it.” “And yet, in a contra-constitutional way, he has sent the National Guard into California. Something is very wrong with this picture.”

Andrew Solender

738,889 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: Newsom responds after a federal judge rules that Trump illegally seized control of California’s National Guard. “Today’s order makes clear that he [Trump] is not above or beyond constitutional constraints.” Newsom mentioned Trump’s name in the same breath as King George, adding that the Founding Fathers didn’t fight a monarchy just to watch another one rise [Trump].
0:41

BREAKING: Newsom responds after a federal judge rules that Trump illegally seized control of California’s National Guard. “Today’s order makes clear that he [Trump] is not above or beyond constitutional constraints.” Newsom mentioned Trump’s name in the same breath as King George, adding that the Founding Fathers didn’t fight a monarchy just to watch another one rise [Trump].

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

339,020 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr