Bret Weinstein explains succinctly today on Rogan how our voting system is designed to be gamed. His point about exit polling is a particularly good one. If in person voting isn’t the exclusive method, exit polling cannot be used to detect fraud - and that’s not an accident.

It's weird how everyone knows about the fraud but the fraudsters are like "too bad" and are fully going to do it anyway.

Everyone knows that if you wish to reduce fraud, you reduce the surface area of attack. The Democrats have done nothing but expand the area that can be attacked. They even had the gall to take the most fraud-prone method of voting -- mail-in-ballots-- and LOWER the signature and address verification standards, inviting in even more fraud. They left says, "Prove it! Show me the evidence" while using every dirty trick in the book to ensure you can't see the evidence. Sure, I can't prove that fraud happened because I can't see the evidence . . . but those bastards can't prove it didn't happen either. The sane thing to do is what VA did. Got to paper ballots same day voting. A child knows that is the correct path. It isn't just incomprehensible that this isn't being done, it's outright evil and an invitation to a crisis . . . which is what the Left will invite rather than losing power.

It is the same reason the polling today is over sampling Democrats by huge margins. Any deviation from that would be considered suspect.

It would be extremely naive to dismiss the overwhelming possibility that elections are cheated, especially for the POTUS position. A position that holds such a vast amount of power on the global scale creates an immense set of incentives for 'big players' to get someone specific in that position. IMMENSE incentives. Think about how some folks will cheat and lie just to get some semblance of power in a small office position or for a managerial role, for example. Translate that to a global scale for the, arguably, most powerful position in the world... Obviously it's crooked.

Exit polling was incredibly reliable right up until Diebold and electronic voting in the late 90s early 2000s. After that they pretty much stopped reporting exit polling on the news because it never matched up again.

When I proposed this in 2016, the DNC and multiple state Democrat committees sued me and Donald Trump. They lost. They appealed to the US Supreme Court. They lost again. Yes exit polling should be conducted and no since those conducting such a poll speak with voters voluntarily only after they have voted, it does not intimidate Voters

People skeptical of the vote are derided, but if you want to allow cheating, what would you differently?

I think it's curious how the chart for the recent Venezuela election follows the same trajectory as the US 2020 election, which was again copied by the 2022 Brazil election. Abrupt disruptions in a linear voting pattern. Yet to show any concern about those pattern disruptions makes you some kind of 'denier'.

of course, if you can't double check how many people actually voted, it makes it a lot easier to add fake votes

Bret Weinstein raises important points on Rogan about how our voting system can be gamed. His comments on exit polling highlight critical flaws—if in-person voting isn't exclusive, it can't effectively detect fraud.