正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Bret Weinstein raises a question that’s hard to shake. He points out the obvious “pay for play” system in American politics — lobbying that lets corporations and special interests nudge decisions in directions that often harm public health and long-term stability. Then he goes further: foreign adversaries (and even...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

446,884 subscribers

19,198 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Bret Weinstein just cut straight to the bone: Epstein wasn't some lone pervert—it was irrefutable evidence of a shadow power structure blackmailing the elite and steering entire governments. He nails it with this killer analogy: Watching your president and officials act in baffling, self-sabotaging ways is like seeing a planet wobble in its orbit. You can't see the object... but the gravitational pull is undeniable. Something massive, hidden, and undeclared is yanking the strings. Weinstein: "Strong evidence it was connected to intelligence services... who knows who else." We glimpse the leverage, the anomalies, the impossible cover-ups... but the full machinery—who it owns, how it enforces, how profoundly it warps policy—stays just out of frame. The haunting core question he won't let go: What exactly is this unnamed force? How much of our "democracy" is real vs. puppet theater? And how deep does its influence run before everything we see is downstream illusion? This isn't tinfoil—it's cold pattern recognition. When stories leave holes that big, those holes exert real power. Clip from recent discussion (1:31 of unflinching clarity—watch if you dare). Does the "invisible gravity" explanation land for you... or feel like it explains too much? What's your gut say about who's really in control?
1:31

Bret Weinstein just cut straight to the bone: Epstein wasn't some lone pervert—it was irrefutable evidence of a shadow power structure blackmailing the elite and steering entire governments. He nails it with this killer analogy: Watching your president and officials act in baffling, self-sabotaging ways is like seeing a planet wobble in its orbit. You can't see the object... but the gravitational pull is undeniable. Something massive, hidden, and undeclared is yanking the strings. Weinstein: "Strong evidence it was connected to intelligence services... who knows who else." We glimpse the leverage, the anomalies, the impossible cover-ups... but the full machinery—who it owns, how it enforces, how profoundly it warps policy—stays just out of frame. The haunting core question he won't let go: What exactly is this unnamed force? How much of our "democracy" is real vs. puppet theater? And how deep does its influence run before everything we see is downstream illusion? This isn't tinfoil—it's cold pattern recognition. When stories leave holes that big, those holes exert real power. Clip from recent discussion (1:31 of unflinching clarity—watch if you dare). Does the "invisible gravity" explanation land for you... or feel like it explains too much? What's your gut say about who's really in control?

Camus

405,925 次观看 • 4 个月前

Let me explain the sinister nature of what Trump actually does to people. He asks: are you loyal to me? Yes. Good. No forever wars. Are you with me? Yes. No forever wars. Then he starts the wars. And now he needs you to be with him on the wars too. And then the Epstein files come out. Allegations involving children. And he needs you to look the other way on that too. That’s the mechanism. That’s how it works. He moves the goalposts incrementally. Each ask is slightly more compromising than the last. And by the time you realize how far you’ve traveled from your own principles you are so deep in that you can’t find your way back. Loyalty to Trump doesn’t mean loyalty to an idea or a policy or a vision for the country. It means asymmetric, unconditional, no-questions-asked loyalty to whatever he decides is true today. You have to understand the sinister nature of that to understand what is really happening in Washington right now. This isn’t politics. This is a loyalty trap.
0:20

Let me explain the sinister nature of what Trump actually does to people. He asks: are you loyal to me? Yes. Good. No forever wars. Are you with me? Yes. No forever wars. Then he starts the wars. And now he needs you to be with him on the wars too. And then the Epstein files come out. Allegations involving children. And he needs you to look the other way on that too. That’s the mechanism. That’s how it works. He moves the goalposts incrementally. Each ask is slightly more compromising than the last. And by the time you realize how far you’ve traveled from your own principles you are so deep in that you can’t find your way back. Loyalty to Trump doesn’t mean loyalty to an idea or a policy or a vision for the country. It means asymmetric, unconditional, no-questions-asked loyalty to whatever he decides is true today. You have to understand the sinister nature of that to understand what is really happening in Washington right now. This isn’t politics. This is a loyalty trap.

Anthony Scaramucci

350,931 次观看 • 4 个月前

Who actually runs our government? In this clip we have a heated debate over power, influence and decision making. Is it elected officials working for the people or do corporations and hidden interests have the real control? From policies and funding to behind the scenes influence, both sides bring arguments that challenge how we see leadership and authority
2:31

Who actually runs our government? In this clip we have a heated debate over power, influence and decision making. Is it elected officials working for the people or do corporations and hidden interests have the real control? From policies and funding to behind the scenes influence, both sides bring arguments that challenge how we see leadership and authority

Charlie Kirk Forever

16,994 次观看 • 2 个月前

Newsom: And I think there’s going to be a hell of a State of the Union. I imagine that could mean more forays overseas — watch what happens with Iran. But this weakness is on display. World leaders have finally figured it out and the American people are seeing it, too. When you stand up to this guy, he backs down. His great strength, if there is one, is figuring out your weakness and exploiting it. But he does not do well when people assert themselves and push back. That’s what the people of Minneapolis have done. That’s what’s happening across this country. And that’s the pathway back: conviction, strength, clarity, purpose.
0:50

Newsom: And I think there’s going to be a hell of a State of the Union. I imagine that could mean more forays overseas — watch what happens with Iran. But this weakness is on display. World leaders have finally figured it out and the American people are seeing it, too. When you stand up to this guy, he backs down. His great strength, if there is one, is figuring out your weakness and exploiting it. But he does not do well when people assert themselves and push back. That’s what the people of Minneapolis have done. That’s what’s happening across this country. And that’s the pathway back: conviction, strength, clarity, purpose.

Acyn

352,570 次观看 • 5 个月前

Meiselas: Trump is literally a parody in the most extreme sense of the creature boogeymen that MAGA created to go after Democrats. He’s quite literally all of it. He covers up the pedo ring. The cabal is in the Oval Office. He’s close to Epstein. He starts wars everywhere. He uses government to quite literally tread on people. Masked agents going through states and terrorizing people. He says that he’s not for you having permits or licenses to carry your guns. He’s against free speech in the most obvious and authoritarian sense. You literally go through everything, and he is the most extreme example of the thing that they claimed this is what he was going to do to stop those people. But it’s important to note that that’s literally the way authoritarianism works. You know, the quote about the devil’s greatest trick is making you believe he never existed. The authoritarian’s greatest trick is to convince you that the authoritarian is the person who is out there to stop the authoritarians, and that’s how they get into power. They have a sixth sense of people’s fears and desires, and they know how to prey on them because they are a predator class. And that’s exactly what Trump and this entire regime is.
1:35

Meiselas: Trump is literally a parody in the most extreme sense of the creature boogeymen that MAGA created to go after Democrats. He’s quite literally all of it. He covers up the pedo ring. The cabal is in the Oval Office. He’s close to Epstein. He starts wars everywhere. He uses government to quite literally tread on people. Masked agents going through states and terrorizing people. He says that he’s not for you having permits or licenses to carry your guns. He’s against free speech in the most obvious and authoritarian sense. You literally go through everything, and he is the most extreme example of the thing that they claimed this is what he was going to do to stop those people. But it’s important to note that that’s literally the way authoritarianism works. You know, the quote about the devil’s greatest trick is making you believe he never existed. The authoritarian’s greatest trick is to convince you that the authoritarian is the person who is out there to stop the authoritarians, and that’s how they get into power. They have a sixth sense of people’s fears and desires, and they know how to prey on them because they are a predator class. And that’s exactly what Trump and this entire regime is.

MeidasTouch

175,987 次观看 • 4 个月前

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."
1:12

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

Patrick OShaughnessy

24,818 次观看 • 5 个月前

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: Israel is not a structure that produces power on its own. There is a mindset here that has managed to hack the American political system through Zionism. What the United States does in this region does not serve its own interests, but benefits Israel. So why does the United States do this? It is not a rational model of behavior. It happens when you influence (American) politics.
1:28

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: Israel is not a structure that produces power on its own. There is a mindset here that has managed to hack the American political system through Zionism. What the United States does in this region does not serve its own interests, but benefits Israel. So why does the United States do this? It is not a rational model of behavior. It happens when you influence (American) politics.

Clash Report

124,523 次观看 • 3 个月前

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: "Israel is not a structure that produces power on its own. There is a mindset here that has managed to hack the American political system through Zionism. What the United States does in this region does not serve its own interests, but benefits Israel. So why does the United States do this? It is not a rational model of behavior. It happens when you influence (American) politics."
1:28

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: "Israel is not a structure that produces power on its own. There is a mindset here that has managed to hack the American political system through Zionism. What the United States does in this region does not serve its own interests, but benefits Israel. So why does the United States do this? It is not a rational model of behavior. It happens when you influence (American) politics."

Open Source Intel

67,752 次观看 • 3 个月前

Mamdani on Arch/Ballroom/Club Rose Garden: My message would be that this is not what government has to be. This is not the only vision for what it looks like to have politics in this country—that is so divorced from the needs and wants of everyday people. And what we are looking to show in New York City is an alternative to what has led so many to become disenchanted with the political process. We want to show that not only can government work, but it must, and that at its core, our responsibility is to working people—to ensure that we’re doing everything to make their lives easier. That has to be what drives our actions, and for too long, government has felt more like a distraction than a fulfillment of the needs of the people who’ve been left behind by the politics of today.
1:26

Mamdani on Arch/Ballroom/Club Rose Garden: My message would be that this is not what government has to be. This is not the only vision for what it looks like to have politics in this country—that is so divorced from the needs and wants of everyday people. And what we are looking to show in New York City is an alternative to what has led so many to become disenchanted with the political process. We want to show that not only can government work, but it must, and that at its core, our responsibility is to working people—to ensure that we’re doing everything to make their lives easier. That has to be what drives our actions, and for too long, government has felt more like a distraction than a fulfillment of the needs of the people who’ve been left behind by the politics of today.

Acyn

31,743 次观看 • 1 个月前

"The question becomes: when does the crash happen? And then, how long does it last?" "And when you come out of it, what are the new technologies that all the companies have to be built on?" Insight Ventures co-founder Jerry Murdock (jerry murdock) identifies the three major trends that will outlast this cycle, and be the dominant platforms of the next.
1:08

"The question becomes: when does the crash happen? And then, how long does it last?" "And when you come out of it, what are the new technologies that all the companies have to be built on?" Insight Ventures co-founder Jerry Murdock (jerry murdock) identifies the three major trends that will outlast this cycle, and be the dominant platforms of the next.

TBPN

12,324 次观看 • 8 个月前

Albanese tells the press that he wants people to engage and talk to each other like he did at the start of his political career. What exactly does he think it is that people do on social media?! He then goes on to reveal the real reason for the current attack on social media which is that people have anonymity! The government doesn’t know who you are and they don’t like it! By the way…. Is he drunk??
1:39

Albanese tells the press that he wants people to engage and talk to each other like he did at the start of his political career. What exactly does he think it is that people do on social media?! He then goes on to reveal the real reason for the current attack on social media which is that people have anonymity! The government doesn’t know who you are and they don’t like it! By the way…. Is he drunk??

Miss Madeleine

267,357 次观看 • 1 年前

TikTok's Revolutionary Idea: Making Discovery a Meritocracy On E212, coatue.thomas told a story of meeting TikTok's founder and being blown away by his simple idea that changed social media forever: "When I met the founder, his view was, 'If I have a great piece of content, how can I have it be shared?'" "If you share it on Instagram, the only way people see it is if you had a lot of followers." "And so he just had a really simple idea and he said, 'What if I take every piece of content that's uploaded into the system and I show it to at least one other user.'" "'So no matter what that content is, at least one person will see it, even if you have no followers.'" "And then based on whether that person views it or how long, I might show it to another user. And then a third, and a fourth." "And it was such a revolutionary idea and it really resonated with me at the time." "It just goes to show how we're in an idea business. And when you have a truly revolutionary idea, it can get really big." "The whole genesis of TikTok came from that really simple concept of, your content will be shown, and if people like it, it will be shown to a lot of people."
0:49

TikTok's Revolutionary Idea: Making Discovery a Meritocracy On E212, coatue.thomas told a story of meeting TikTok's founder and being blown away by his simple idea that changed social media forever: "When I met the founder, his view was, 'If I have a great piece of content, how can I have it be shared?'" "If you share it on Instagram, the only way people see it is if you had a lot of followers." "And so he just had a really simple idea and he said, 'What if I take every piece of content that's uploaded into the system and I show it to at least one other user.'" "'So no matter what that content is, at least one person will see it, even if you have no followers.'" "And then based on whether that person views it or how long, I might show it to another user. And then a third, and a fourth." "And it was such a revolutionary idea and it really resonated with me at the time." "It just goes to show how we're in an idea business. And when you have a truly revolutionary idea, it can get really big." "The whole genesis of TikTok came from that really simple concept of, your content will be shown, and if people like it, it will be shown to a lot of people."

The All-In Podcast

42,652 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance says conservatives should stop BLACK-PILLING, and he nailed it "Blackpilling is how you give power to the forces that are trying to DESTROY what our ancestors built." "They say, 'that's not what we voted for. We're going to check out of politics.' No! That's the exact wrong response." "If we do something you don't like, the response should be to get MORE involved, to make your voice HEARD, and to try to push things in the direction that you want them to be pushed." "Our civilization was not built overnight! It's not going to be saved overnight." Truth! "What I'd encourage you to do is stay involved, be patient, and don't let disappointment turn to checking out of the system entirely." "There's way too much of that, I would say, in the Anglo system and the American system. There's way too much, 'I didn't like this thing that the vice president said, or I didn't like this thing that the president did, and I'm going to completely check out.' We call that blackpilling in the United States of America." "We need to take power back from those people and build the kind of institutions that can actually save our societies." "It will not happen overnight. It will not happen in the term of one prime minister or one president, but it will happen so long as we keep our faith in God and we work hard to achieve it. That's what we have to do."
1:45

🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance says conservatives should stop BLACK-PILLING, and he nailed it "Blackpilling is how you give power to the forces that are trying to DESTROY what our ancestors built." "They say, 'that's not what we voted for. We're going to check out of politics.' No! That's the exact wrong response." "If we do something you don't like, the response should be to get MORE involved, to make your voice HEARD, and to try to push things in the direction that you want them to be pushed." "Our civilization was not built overnight! It's not going to be saved overnight." Truth! "What I'd encourage you to do is stay involved, be patient, and don't let disappointment turn to checking out of the system entirely." "There's way too much of that, I would say, in the Anglo system and the American system. There's way too much, 'I didn't like this thing that the vice president said, or I didn't like this thing that the president did, and I'm going to completely check out.' We call that blackpilling in the United States of America." "We need to take power back from those people and build the kind of institutions that can actually save our societies." "It will not happen overnight. It will not happen in the term of one prime minister or one president, but it will happen so long as we keep our faith in God and we work hard to achieve it. That's what we have to do."

Eric Daugherty

442,204 次观看 • 3 个月前

They taught you electricity was just wires and connections. Nothing more. But there was a hidden power... One they never told you about. Tesla understood it. He exposed it. And that's why they silenced him. Electricity was never just energy. It was control. It was consciousness. Something never meant for the masses. What the awakened know isn't in textbooks. It's not tauaht in schools And you'll never see it on the news. The truth is there. But first, you have to learn how to see it. Nothing is what it seems. Do you dare to question what you have been taught? In "The Truth of the World,"
2:25

They taught you electricity was just wires and connections. Nothing more. But there was a hidden power... One they never told you about. Tesla understood it. He exposed it. And that's why they silenced him. Electricity was never just energy. It was control. It was consciousness. Something never meant for the masses. What the awakened know isn't in textbooks. It's not tauaht in schools And you'll never see it on the news. The truth is there. But first, you have to learn how to see it. Nothing is what it seems. Do you dare to question what you have been taught? In "The Truth of the World,"

Kyle L

147,782 次观看 • 5 个月前

JUST IN: Bret Weinstein says there is a "cheat margin" in elections, says America owes Trump a debt of gratitude for proving it could be beaten. The comment came after Weinstein argued that there is only a certain amount of democracy in America. Joe Rogan and Weinstein discussed the JFK assas*ination and how it may have been an "interference" with democracy. "One of the things that I'm trying to convince people of is that it's not hopeless because they can cheat but it means that you have to succeed at a level that exceeds their capacity to erase it." "We owe Trump a huge debt of gratitude for proving something that I couldn't have told you if it was true before he won the presidency..." "Which is, there is still enough democracy left in the system for something to upend the plan."
3:21

JUST IN: Bret Weinstein says there is a "cheat margin" in elections, says America owes Trump a debt of gratitude for proving it could be beaten. The comment came after Weinstein argued that there is only a certain amount of democracy in America. Joe Rogan and Weinstein discussed the JFK assas*ination and how it may have been an "interference" with democracy. "One of the things that I'm trying to convince people of is that it's not hopeless because they can cheat but it means that you have to succeed at a level that exceeds their capacity to erase it." "We owe Trump a huge debt of gratitude for proving something that I couldn't have told you if it was true before he won the presidency..." "Which is, there is still enough democracy left in the system for something to upend the plan."

Collin Rugg

2,502,989 次观看 • 1 年前

2023. Bernie says there should not be billionaires, and is pressed on what his line is for exactly how much wealth he thinks someone should be able to have. "If there should not be billionaires, then that’s the line.” There it is. The magical number that Bernie has decreed as the maximum amount of individual success that should be allowed in America.
0:40

2023. Bernie says there should not be billionaires, and is pressed on what his line is for exactly how much wealth he thinks someone should be able to have. "If there should not be billionaires, then that’s the line.” There it is. The magical number that Bernie has decreed as the maximum amount of individual success that should be allowed in America.

Western Lensman

27,008 次观看 • 22 天前

Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. Why Does Evil Dominate the World? — John MacArthur // March 4, 2007 If God is not in total control of evil, if He has not ordained it – listen - and if He does not have it under complete control at every millisecond of history, then this universe is out of control at the most crucial point. If God is not in control of this completely, then how and when will He get the knowledge and the power to get it under control? And I would ask you this: would you rather have a God trying to get control of evil, or a God completely in control of it? Take your choice. But the God of the Bible is in complete control of evil for His own purposes. It is really heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God that is far above the willy-nilly choices of people. So, what do we know up to now? Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. This is critical: He had a purpose for evil. What is that purpose that God had for evil? Before I answer that question - and that’s the fourth in our little outline - let me read the Westminster Confession from the 1700s; some great theologians and biblical scholars put this together. Listen carefully: “God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass:“ Yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away ... sinfulness proceeds not only from the creature; proceeds only from the creature and not from God, who, being most holy and righteous, neither ... can be the author and approver of sin.” But then, says the Westminster Confession, all that God decrees and all that God providentially brings to pass is all to the praise of His glory - and they got it right.The reason for God ordaining evil is for the praise of His glory. Let me ask you a simple question to help you answer the question - the bigger question: is God more glorious because of sin existing or less glorious? Pretty easy question to answer, isn’t it? That really is the ultimate question. Throughout all the eons of eternity, will God receive more glory from His creatures because sin existed or less? And, friends, that’s really all that matters, is the eternal glory of God. So, it’s fourth down, and we’re on the ten-yard line, and I’m pulling out the winning play and we’re going for six for the victory. Turn to Romans 3 - and I want you to track with me a little bit; can’t take time to develop all of this, but I’m going to give you a good start. Wish I could build context; we don’t have time. But let’s look at chapter 3 and verse 5. Opening statement: “But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say?” Grab that phrase: our right - unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. And Paul uses the first of a series of verbs; this one happens to be sunistēmi, translated demonstrates in the New American Standard. It is a verb that means to disclose, to reveal, to put on display, to show. Our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. Another way to say that would be, would you really understand the righteousness of God if you didn’t understand unrighteousness? Isn’t there something to be gained by the contrast? Paul has been showing that God is faithful to His promises to Israel, and their sin and unbelief cannot alter God’s covenant, cannot alter God’s faithfulness.
8:11

Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. Why Does Evil Dominate the World? — John MacArthur // March 4, 2007 If God is not in total control of evil, if He has not ordained it – listen - and if He does not have it under complete control at every millisecond of history, then this universe is out of control at the most crucial point. If God is not in control of this completely, then how and when will He get the knowledge and the power to get it under control? And I would ask you this: would you rather have a God trying to get control of evil, or a God completely in control of it? Take your choice. But the God of the Bible is in complete control of evil for His own purposes. It is really heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God that is far above the willy-nilly choices of people. So, what do we know up to now? Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. This is critical: He had a purpose for evil. What is that purpose that God had for evil? Before I answer that question - and that’s the fourth in our little outline - let me read the Westminster Confession from the 1700s; some great theologians and biblical scholars put this together. Listen carefully: “God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass:“ Yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away ... sinfulness proceeds not only from the creature; proceeds only from the creature and not from God, who, being most holy and righteous, neither ... can be the author and approver of sin.” But then, says the Westminster Confession, all that God decrees and all that God providentially brings to pass is all to the praise of His glory - and they got it right.The reason for God ordaining evil is for the praise of His glory. Let me ask you a simple question to help you answer the question - the bigger question: is God more glorious because of sin existing or less glorious? Pretty easy question to answer, isn’t it? That really is the ultimate question. Throughout all the eons of eternity, will God receive more glory from His creatures because sin existed or less? And, friends, that’s really all that matters, is the eternal glory of God. So, it’s fourth down, and we’re on the ten-yard line, and I’m pulling out the winning play and we’re going for six for the victory. Turn to Romans 3 - and I want you to track with me a little bit; can’t take time to develop all of this, but I’m going to give you a good start. Wish I could build context; we don’t have time. But let’s look at chapter 3 and verse 5. Opening statement: “But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say?” Grab that phrase: our right - unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. And Paul uses the first of a series of verbs; this one happens to be sunistēmi, translated demonstrates in the New American Standard. It is a verb that means to disclose, to reveal, to put on display, to show. Our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. Another way to say that would be, would you really understand the righteousness of God if you didn’t understand unrighteousness? Isn’t there something to be gained by the contrast? Paul has been showing that God is faithful to His promises to Israel, and their sin and unbelief cannot alter God’s covenant, cannot alter God’s faithfulness.

Terri Green

24,466 次观看 • 2 个月前