Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Brian Harpole appears quite confident that no flash will be captured on camera, thereby refuting the exploding mic theory. I learned something important. 💥 The immediate flash from a small amount of PETN lasts between 1 to 5 microseconds. - Flash Duration: Lasts 1-5 microseconds (millionths of a second)....

NihiloX's profile picture

Travis

27,276 subscribers

71,486 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

What if we could RECREATE the REFLECTION of the FLASH seen in the GLASS during the Charlie Kirk assassination? Literally recreate it on site. The timing of the flash seen in the reflection of the glass is what makes it so interesting. What else would cause a flash that bright in the middle of the day? This could at least determine a lot of good information and confirm or deny theories that are out there. Just to get an idea of where the FLASH came from, which could identify a possible shooter or 2nd shooter location. The reason I say this is because it lines up perfectly with the sound of the gun, meaning you see the flash first, then you hear the shot, which would make sense because light travels faster than sound. This way we could get an idea of where it came from in the first place and determine if it's a good lead or not and then check the crowd or building locations. It could be recreated with a camera flash or something with bright enough lumens. This could clear up at least one theory or confirm it and lead us in the right direction of where the shooter could have been. Please comment with your thoughts and ideas. We need to get someone out there to the location with the Proper equipment. At least we could confirm or deny some theories. Video in bottom left shows the flash.
0:52

What if we could RECREATE the REFLECTION of the FLASH seen in the GLASS during the Charlie Kirk assassination? Literally recreate it on site. The timing of the flash seen in the reflection of the glass is what makes it so interesting. What else would cause a flash that bright in the middle of the day? This could at least determine a lot of good information and confirm or deny theories that are out there. Just to get an idea of where the FLASH came from, which could identify a possible shooter or 2nd shooter location. The reason I say this is because it lines up perfectly with the sound of the gun, meaning you see the flash first, then you hear the shot, which would make sense because light travels faster than sound. This way we could get an idea of where it came from in the first place and determine if it's a good lead or not and then check the crowd or building locations. It could be recreated with a camera flash or something with bright enough lumens. This could clear up at least one theory or confirm it and lead us in the right direction of where the shooter could have been. Please comment with your thoughts and ideas. We need to get someone out there to the location with the Proper equipment. At least we could confirm or deny some theories. Video in bottom left shows the flash.

The SCIF

108,760 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.
0:16

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.

MJTruthUltra

10,664,340 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Shortly before midnight, we had multiple reports sent in of an extremely bright green flash in the sky to the north. We went back in our database of Aurora cameras to find the culprit… and here it is!! The Manistee camera had the best angle as the object streaked across the northern sky. You can even pick up on a faint auroral glow at the same time! Not only that, but you can see the streak left behind from the flash after it occurred. Time was 11:13 PM EDT and approximately 35 seconds, October 29th, 2025, for those who’d also like to check any home security cameras.
0:21

Shortly before midnight, we had multiple reports sent in of an extremely bright green flash in the sky to the north. We went back in our database of Aurora cameras to find the culprit… and here it is!! The Manistee camera had the best angle as the object streaked across the northern sky. You can even pick up on a faint auroral glow at the same time! Not only that, but you can see the streak left behind from the flash after it occurred. Time was 11:13 PM EDT and approximately 35 seconds, October 29th, 2025, for those who’d also like to check any home security cameras.

Michigan Storm Chasers

19,421 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

What does a rifle using subsonic ammo sound like? What type of muzzle flash can you expect? Is it so quiet you can't hear it? Here's a video I shot over a year ago when people were saying there was "muzzle flash" from the AGR building in Butler. Spoiler Alert: While at the time I could not definitively say what it was (it was later confirmed as a reflection of headlights from a police cruiser), I knew immediately, it was NOT muzzle flash. This is .223 with a very short barrel which is the most likely to produce muzzle flash. 300BLK or 8.6BLK or just about any other caliber will be slightly quieter and produce even less muzzle flash. Takeaway: If you don't see muzzle flash from this, you won't see muzzle flash from any other rifle that is suppressed and using subsonic ammo.
4:10

What does a rifle using subsonic ammo sound like? What type of muzzle flash can you expect? Is it so quiet you can't hear it? Here's a video I shot over a year ago when people were saying there was "muzzle flash" from the AGR building in Butler. Spoiler Alert: While at the time I could not definitively say what it was (it was later confirmed as a reflection of headlights from a police cruiser), I knew immediately, it was NOT muzzle flash. This is .223 with a very short barrel which is the most likely to produce muzzle flash. 300BLK or 8.6BLK or just about any other caliber will be slightly quieter and produce even less muzzle flash. Takeaway: If you don't see muzzle flash from this, you won't see muzzle flash from any other rifle that is suppressed and using subsonic ammo.

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

97,360 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Elon Musk just declared the human eye optional. Not improved. Not repaired. Not reconstructed. Optional. Musk: “Blindsight will enable those who have total loss of vision to be able to see again.” That alone would be historic. Musk: “Including if they have lost their eyes, or the optic nerve.” Eyes gone. Nerve gone. The entire optical pipeline physically missing from the skull. And the solution is not to rebuild what broke. It is to skip it entirely and wire synthetic signal straight into the visual cortex. Every surgery ever performed has tried to restore original hardware to factory condition. Neuralink does not restore. Neuralink treats the biological organ as optional infrastructure. Eye is gone. You do not rebuild the eye. You route around it. You stream raw visual data into the brain and let the cortex do what it was always doing anyway. Processing signal. Your eye never saw anything. Your brain saw. The eye was the middleman. It captured a narrow band of electromagnetic radiation and shipped it to the visual cortex. That is where the image was actually built. Neuralink is firing the middleman. Musk: “Maybe have never seen, were even blind from birth.” A person who has never perceived a single photon of light. Given vision for the first time. Not through healing. Through hardware. And then Musk said the part that should rewire how you think about being human. Musk: “You can see in radar, you can see in infrared, ultraviolet.” This is where it crosses from medical device to species upgrade. The human eye processes roughly 0.0035% of the electromagnetic spectrum. You are walking through a universe flooded with information and your biology lets you perceive an almost immeasurably thin sliver of it. Infrared is bouncing off every surface around you right now. You cannot see it. Radio waves are passing through your body this second. You have no idea. Your biology decided four hundred million years ago what you were allowed to perceive. That decision has never been appealed. Until now. A person with Blindsight would not see like a human. They would see like a machine. Thermal signatures in total darkness. Ultraviolet patterns invisible to every sighted person alive. Radar imaging through walls and weather and smoke. The person born blind would not just gain sight. They would gain sight the sighted have never had. Musk: “Superhuman capabilities.” If you can replace the eye you can replace the ear. If you can stream vision you can stream sound, pressure, spatial orientation, sensory inputs that do not even have names yet because biology never built receptors for them. Every human sense is just a biological sensor converting environmental data into electrical signal. Replace the sensor and the brain does not care where the signal came from. It just processes. That is not a medical company. That is the first serious engineering effort to open the human nervous system to direct hardware integration. Musk: “Cybernetic enhancement.” He said it like a line item on a roadmap. Those two words contain the entire future of the species. The senses are ports. The brain is an operating system waiting for better peripherals. We spent millions of years evolving eyes that could see just enough light to not get eaten. That was the design spec. Survival. Not comprehension. Neuralink is the first product built on a different spec. Every person on earth right now is experiencing a filtered, compressed, biologically throttled version of the universe. Most will live and die believing that narrow bandwidth is all there is. Musk is building the device that proves it never was. It was just all you were equipped for. The eye was not the end of sight. It was the prototype.
0:29

Elon Musk just declared the human eye optional. Not improved. Not repaired. Not reconstructed. Optional. Musk: “Blindsight will enable those who have total loss of vision to be able to see again.” That alone would be historic. Musk: “Including if they have lost their eyes, or the optic nerve.” Eyes gone. Nerve gone. The entire optical pipeline physically missing from the skull. And the solution is not to rebuild what broke. It is to skip it entirely and wire synthetic signal straight into the visual cortex. Every surgery ever performed has tried to restore original hardware to factory condition. Neuralink does not restore. Neuralink treats the biological organ as optional infrastructure. Eye is gone. You do not rebuild the eye. You route around it. You stream raw visual data into the brain and let the cortex do what it was always doing anyway. Processing signal. Your eye never saw anything. Your brain saw. The eye was the middleman. It captured a narrow band of electromagnetic radiation and shipped it to the visual cortex. That is where the image was actually built. Neuralink is firing the middleman. Musk: “Maybe have never seen, were even blind from birth.” A person who has never perceived a single photon of light. Given vision for the first time. Not through healing. Through hardware. And then Musk said the part that should rewire how you think about being human. Musk: “You can see in radar, you can see in infrared, ultraviolet.” This is where it crosses from medical device to species upgrade. The human eye processes roughly 0.0035% of the electromagnetic spectrum. You are walking through a universe flooded with information and your biology lets you perceive an almost immeasurably thin sliver of it. Infrared is bouncing off every surface around you right now. You cannot see it. Radio waves are passing through your body this second. You have no idea. Your biology decided four hundred million years ago what you were allowed to perceive. That decision has never been appealed. Until now. A person with Blindsight would not see like a human. They would see like a machine. Thermal signatures in total darkness. Ultraviolet patterns invisible to every sighted person alive. Radar imaging through walls and weather and smoke. The person born blind would not just gain sight. They would gain sight the sighted have never had. Musk: “Superhuman capabilities.” If you can replace the eye you can replace the ear. If you can stream vision you can stream sound, pressure, spatial orientation, sensory inputs that do not even have names yet because biology never built receptors for them. Every human sense is just a biological sensor converting environmental data into electrical signal. Replace the sensor and the brain does not care where the signal came from. It just processes. That is not a medical company. That is the first serious engineering effort to open the human nervous system to direct hardware integration. Musk: “Cybernetic enhancement.” He said it like a line item on a roadmap. Those two words contain the entire future of the species. The senses are ports. The brain is an operating system waiting for better peripherals. We spent millions of years evolving eyes that could see just enough light to not get eaten. That was the design spec. Survival. Not comprehension. Neuralink is the first product built on a different spec. Every person on earth right now is experiencing a filtered, compressed, biologically throttled version of the universe. Most will live and die believing that narrow bandwidth is all there is. Musk is building the device that proves it never was. It was just all you were equipped for. The eye was not the end of sight. It was the prototype.

Dustin

293,374 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

GUN SHOT FLASH caught behind blue tent behind Charlie on VIDEO and the SOUND of a 2ND GUN SHOT captured on audio. Does this PROVE the 2ND SHOOTER theory? You have to see this. This could be a huge breakthrough. You can actual see the gun shot flash coming out of a barrel of some sort from BEHIND Charlie's tent. Right after the FIRST shot is seen and caught on video, when you slow down the footage, you can actually hear TWO SEPERATE GUN SHOTS. There is ANOTHER gun shot right after the FIRST one, which the SOUND of it is caught on the camera's audio. You can't deny that this is the FLASH of a gun shot seen clearly on video coming from behind that blue tent. This needs to be absolutely confirmed because this could be a huge break through confirming a potential location of one shooter behind the blue tent and confirming the existence of a 2nd SHOOTER somewhere else. I want to hear feedback, what do you think? cc: Project Constitution
0:51

GUN SHOT FLASH caught behind blue tent behind Charlie on VIDEO and the SOUND of a 2ND GUN SHOT captured on audio. Does this PROVE the 2ND SHOOTER theory? You have to see this. This could be a huge breakthrough. You can actual see the gun shot flash coming out of a barrel of some sort from BEHIND Charlie's tent. Right after the FIRST shot is seen and caught on video, when you slow down the footage, you can actually hear TWO SEPERATE GUN SHOTS. There is ANOTHER gun shot right after the FIRST one, which the SOUND of it is caught on the camera's audio. You can't deny that this is the FLASH of a gun shot seen clearly on video coming from behind that blue tent. This needs to be absolutely confirmed because this could be a huge break through confirming a potential location of one shooter behind the blue tent and confirming the existence of a 2nd SHOOTER somewhere else. I want to hear feedback, what do you think? cc: Project Constitution

The SCIF

32,169 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

JANE STREET'S FASTEST TRADES HAPPEN IN LESS TIME THAN IT TAKES YOU TO BLINK A blink lasts about a third of a second. Their trading system has to make a decision in under 190 microseconds. Their head of tech described what that speed actually looks like: "If you attach a telescope to the wire on the way in and the wire on the way out, you would see the packet start to leave before it's done being consumed." At that speed a normal computer chip can't even keep up. So they hardwire the decision into the circuit itself, plugged straight into the network. No thinking. Just reflex, at the speed of light.
2:28

JANE STREET'S FASTEST TRADES HAPPEN IN LESS TIME THAN IT TAKES YOU TO BLINK A blink lasts about a third of a second. Their trading system has to make a decision in under 190 microseconds. Their head of tech described what that speed actually looks like: "If you attach a telescope to the wire on the way in and the wire on the way out, you would see the packet start to leave before it's done being consumed." At that speed a normal computer chip can't even keep up. So they hardwire the decision into the circuit itself, plugged straight into the network. No thinking. Just reflex, at the speed of light.

WOLF

26,718 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk just proved every sighted person on Earth is blind. Your eye captures 0.0035% of the electromagnetic spectrum. You are not seeing the universe. You are seeing the sliver your biology decided was enough to keep you alive. That was never vision. That was a survival filter bolted onto your perception four hundred million years ago. No one has ever removed it. Musk: “Blindsight will enable those who have total loss of vision to be able to see again. Including if they have lost their eyes, or the optic nerve.” No eyes. No nerve. The entire optical system physically absent from the skull. Neuralink does not rebuild what broke. It routes around biology entirely. It streams synthetic signal straight into the visual cortex. Your eye never saw anything. Your brain did. Your brain sits in total darkness inside a vault of bone. It has never seen the sun. It has never seen anything. It builds reality out of whatever electrical signal the eye allows through. The eye is the bottleneck between your mind and the universe. Neuralink removes the bottleneck. Musk: “Maybe have never seen, were even blind from birth.” A human who has never perceived a single photon of light. Given sight for the first time. Not through medicine. Through engineering. Musk: “You can see in radar, you can see in infrared, ultraviolet.” Infrared is pouring off every surface in the room around you. Radio waves are passing through your body right now. Ultraviolet is painting patterns across everything you have ever looked at. You cannot see any of it. Your biology locked you out before you were born. Musk: “Superhuman capabilities.” The person born blind would not be restored to human sight. They would see more of the universe than any sighted person who has ever lived. The blind would out-see the sighted. You will not pity them. You will envy them. Musk: “Cybernetic enhancement.” Every human sense is a sensor converting the world into electrical signal. Replace the sensor and the brain does not care where the signal came from. It just processes. Your senses were never built to show you reality. They were built to show you just enough of it to survive. Evolution built a keyhole. We called it sight. Elon Musk is not fixing blindness. He is fixing sight.
0:29

Elon Musk just proved every sighted person on Earth is blind. Your eye captures 0.0035% of the electromagnetic spectrum. You are not seeing the universe. You are seeing the sliver your biology decided was enough to keep you alive. That was never vision. That was a survival filter bolted onto your perception four hundred million years ago. No one has ever removed it. Musk: “Blindsight will enable those who have total loss of vision to be able to see again. Including if they have lost their eyes, or the optic nerve.” No eyes. No nerve. The entire optical system physically absent from the skull. Neuralink does not rebuild what broke. It routes around biology entirely. It streams synthetic signal straight into the visual cortex. Your eye never saw anything. Your brain did. Your brain sits in total darkness inside a vault of bone. It has never seen the sun. It has never seen anything. It builds reality out of whatever electrical signal the eye allows through. The eye is the bottleneck between your mind and the universe. Neuralink removes the bottleneck. Musk: “Maybe have never seen, were even blind from birth.” A human who has never perceived a single photon of light. Given sight for the first time. Not through medicine. Through engineering. Musk: “You can see in radar, you can see in infrared, ultraviolet.” Infrared is pouring off every surface in the room around you. Radio waves are passing through your body right now. Ultraviolet is painting patterns across everything you have ever looked at. You cannot see any of it. Your biology locked you out before you were born. Musk: “Superhuman capabilities.” The person born blind would not be restored to human sight. They would see more of the universe than any sighted person who has ever lived. The blind would out-see the sighted. You will not pity them. You will envy them. Musk: “Cybernetic enhancement.” Every human sense is a sensor converting the world into electrical signal. Replace the sensor and the brain does not care where the signal came from. It just processes. Your senses were never built to show you reality. They were built to show you just enough of it to survive. Evolution built a keyhole. We called it sight. Elon Musk is not fixing blindness. He is fixing sight.

Dustin

745,756 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

OPTICAL AIDS CAUSE 28 DAY MONTHS? NCS does not recommend that we use optical aids for a moonsighting system in Britain for many reasons. The primary reason is that we are seeking a unified solution, and unity is in the sunnah - local, naked eye sightings. Not everybody believes that optical aids are permissible, but naked eye sightings are wholly uncontroversial. Another issue is that optical aids would lead to more and more examples of the moon being “seen” a day early, and out of phase, on the 28th of a lunar month. This has ALREADY HAPPENED to those who use optical aids in the UK - yet has never happened to naked eye moonsighters for over 100 months. Whilst there are procedures from the sunnah of what to do if you were to see a moon on the 28th, we cannot really justify asking people to end their fast a day early on the 28th because of a moon which is invisible to the eye and only visible through optical aids. Hence our stance. Remember - we ourselves use optical aids - and had them on our livestream. We are experienced in them, and it is from our experience we share with you that we have found that it would leave to problems. In any case why are you in a rush to end Ramadan, using technology, and away from the sunnah?
1:02

OPTICAL AIDS CAUSE 28 DAY MONTHS? NCS does not recommend that we use optical aids for a moonsighting system in Britain for many reasons. The primary reason is that we are seeking a unified solution, and unity is in the sunnah - local, naked eye sightings. Not everybody believes that optical aids are permissible, but naked eye sightings are wholly uncontroversial. Another issue is that optical aids would lead to more and more examples of the moon being “seen” a day early, and out of phase, on the 28th of a lunar month. This has ALREADY HAPPENED to those who use optical aids in the UK - yet has never happened to naked eye moonsighters for over 100 months. Whilst there are procedures from the sunnah of what to do if you were to see a moon on the 28th, we cannot really justify asking people to end their fast a day early on the 28th because of a moon which is invisible to the eye and only visible through optical aids. Hence our stance. Remember - we ourselves use optical aids - and had them on our livestream. We are experienced in them, and it is from our experience we share with you that we have found that it would leave to problems. In any case why are you in a rush to end Ramadan, using technology, and away from the sunnah?

New Crescent Society

18,343 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Alexander Volkanovski says people are being too harsh on Tom Aspinall, revealing he still deals with eye issues from the Diego Lopes eye poke. “I think everyone’s being pretty harsh on Tom Aspinall. Eye issues can really mess with you quite a bit. A lot of people expect your eye to be falling out or something. From my first fight with Diego Lopes, I still have things playing up in my eye because of it. I still see flashes on the sides of my vision. You could be one hit away from losing your vision.” (Via Alex Volkanovski )
1:19

Alexander Volkanovski says people are being too harsh on Tom Aspinall, revealing he still deals with eye issues from the Diego Lopes eye poke. “I think everyone’s being pretty harsh on Tom Aspinall. Eye issues can really mess with you quite a bit. A lot of people expect your eye to be falling out or something. From my first fight with Diego Lopes, I still have things playing up in my eye because of it. I still see flashes on the sides of my vision. You could be one hit away from losing your vision.” (Via Alex Volkanovski )

Red Corner MMA

103,283 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

YouTuber AlphaPhoenix pulled off something that sounds impossible. He recorded a laser moving across a room at 2 billion frames per second. That is fast enough to watch light itself travel, something the human eye can never perceive in real time. The camera he used was not a normal high speed camera. It recorded only one pixel at a time. To build a full video, he fired the laser again and again, each time recording a single pixel from a slightly different point. After thousands of captures, he stitched the pixels together into a full frame sequence that reveals the light wave moving through space. It is a mind bending mix of physics and creativity. The end result lets us watch one of the fastest phenomena in the universe at a speed we can finally understand.
0:20

YouTuber AlphaPhoenix pulled off something that sounds impossible. He recorded a laser moving across a room at 2 billion frames per second. That is fast enough to watch light itself travel, something the human eye can never perceive in real time. The camera he used was not a normal high speed camera. It recorded only one pixel at a time. To build a full video, he fired the laser again and again, each time recording a single pixel from a slightly different point. After thousands of captures, he stitched the pixels together into a full frame sequence that reveals the light wave moving through space. It is a mind bending mix of physics and creativity. The end result lets us watch one of the fastest phenomena in the universe at a speed we can finally understand.

Kekius Maximus

697,154 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Elon Musk: We might just be the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence. “They call it the singularity for a reason, because we don't know what's going to happen. In the not-too-distant future, the percentage of intelligence that is human will be quite small. At some point, the collective sum of human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence. If things get to A Kardashev Level 2, we're talking about human intelligence. Even assuming a significant increase in human population and intelligence augmentation, like massive intelligence augmentation, where, like, everyone has an IQ of a thousand, even in that circumstance, collective human intelligence will probably be 1 billionth that of digital intelligence. We're the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” Interview at Y Combinator, June 16, 2025
0:41

Elon Musk: We might just be the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence. “They call it the singularity for a reason, because we don't know what's going to happen. In the not-too-distant future, the percentage of intelligence that is human will be quite small. At some point, the collective sum of human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence. If things get to A Kardashev Level 2, we're talking about human intelligence. Even assuming a significant increase in human population and intelligence augmentation, like massive intelligence augmentation, where, like, everyone has an IQ of a thousand, even in that circumstance, collective human intelligence will probably be 1 billionth that of digital intelligence. We're the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” Interview at Y Combinator, June 16, 2025

ELON CLIPS

32,399 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:
0:21

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

16,608 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

*NEW CRESCENT SOCIETY: USE OF OPTICAL AIDS??* Please watch our video which explains our position - and which has always been our position! NOTES from video: There are a range of opinions about this topic. We accept all these as valid. NCS takes the most traditional method of using naked eye sightings only. Whilst we use technology to help us sight the moon, the months only begin when a human sees the crescent with their naked eye. Why? CLOSEST TO SUNNAH AND MOST UNIFYING: - NCS are working for a united calendar. - Naked eye sightings is the closest position to the sunnah, and the one that everybody will agree on. - Many will not accept telescopes or astrocameras or CCDs or other forms of optical aids. Yet everyone accepts sunnah of naked eye. Thus adhering closely to the sunnah brings unity insha allah. MOST HARMONIOUS WITH NATURE AND THE PAST: - If you use technology, you will move the calendar a day earlier than nature. It would mean you are bringing the invisible moon into visible. - For example, imagine the moon at the time of the Prophet SAW was seen on a given month on a Tuesday; but telescopes would move the moon to a Monday. Optical aids mean that the calendar out of phase with how the Prophet SAW and all subsequent generations saw the moon MOVES CALENDAR AWAY FROM COMMUNITY: - The spirit of the calendar is one of simplicity and community. - The Introduction of expensive tech would move the calendar away from the hands of the whole community into the hands of specialist astronomers - In certain countries, for example, it appears that NO ONE on the country sees the moon except for the 2-3 same astronomers every year. You deprive the community of the moon. - The spirit of the calendar is that EVERYONE should see the moon. Indeed in many law schools hence some islamic books talk of “large crowds” should see the moon with their eyes for a month to commence. Whenever you are starting - ramadan mubarak. May it be a month of blessing, forgiveness and compassion.
3:47

*NEW CRESCENT SOCIETY: USE OF OPTICAL AIDS??* Please watch our video which explains our position - and which has always been our position! NOTES from video: There are a range of opinions about this topic. We accept all these as valid. NCS takes the most traditional method of using naked eye sightings only. Whilst we use technology to help us sight the moon, the months only begin when a human sees the crescent with their naked eye. Why? CLOSEST TO SUNNAH AND MOST UNIFYING: - NCS are working for a united calendar. - Naked eye sightings is the closest position to the sunnah, and the one that everybody will agree on. - Many will not accept telescopes or astrocameras or CCDs or other forms of optical aids. Yet everyone accepts sunnah of naked eye. Thus adhering closely to the sunnah brings unity insha allah. MOST HARMONIOUS WITH NATURE AND THE PAST: - If you use technology, you will move the calendar a day earlier than nature. It would mean you are bringing the invisible moon into visible. - For example, imagine the moon at the time of the Prophet SAW was seen on a given month on a Tuesday; but telescopes would move the moon to a Monday. Optical aids mean that the calendar out of phase with how the Prophet SAW and all subsequent generations saw the moon MOVES CALENDAR AWAY FROM COMMUNITY: - The spirit of the calendar is one of simplicity and community. - The Introduction of expensive tech would move the calendar away from the hands of the whole community into the hands of specialist astronomers - In certain countries, for example, it appears that NO ONE on the country sees the moon except for the 2-3 same astronomers every year. You deprive the community of the moon. - The spirit of the calendar is that EVERYONE should see the moon. Indeed in many law schools hence some islamic books talk of “large crowds” should see the moon with their eyes for a month to commence. Whenever you are starting - ramadan mubarak. May it be a month of blessing, forgiveness and compassion.

New Crescent Society

16,069 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

My Tesla model S was the victim of an attempted deering this morning. Had just left the grocery store and it was still dark ~0615hrs. I saw a slight flash out of the corner of my right eye and hit the brakes right as the collision alert started blaring. It doesn't look as close as I think it was but it felt like the left front of my car could have touched the tail had I been even a second slower in reacting. As an aside editing video on a desktop browser doesn't seem to let you clip things. Go to 0:50s or so in the below video if you want to see the attempted Tesla killer
0:59

My Tesla model S was the victim of an attempted deering this morning. Had just left the grocery store and it was still dark ~0615hrs. I saw a slight flash out of the corner of my right eye and hit the brakes right as the collision alert started blaring. It doesn't look as close as I think it was but it felt like the left front of my car could have touched the tail had I been even a second slower in reacting. As an aside editing video on a desktop browser doesn't seem to let you clip things. Go to 0:50s or so in the below video if you want to see the attempted Tesla killer

Ryan Scanlan 👥

120,099 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

I only have eyes for you, Dad. 👀 Take a moment to admire not only this sweet “serve and return” conversation between this father and daughter - but the completely unbroken eye contact they share. Eye contact is an important early developmental milestone for your baby and key to strengthening attachment during infancy. So carve out time for regular face-to-face interaction. This eight-week-old is in a particular sweet spot on the eye contact front, as newborns’ vision tends to take on greater clarity and focus between 6-10 weeks. Suddenly see can see dad’s face in detail and doesn’t want to miss a single second. What a sweet duo. (Note that if your baby is not making regular eye contact by 2-3 months of age, it’s worth bringing this to the attention of your pediatrician - as this may be a sign of a vision issue or other developmental concern.) This great video was shared to IG by marywrites.
0:31

I only have eyes for you, Dad. 👀 Take a moment to admire not only this sweet “serve and return” conversation between this father and daughter - but the completely unbroken eye contact they share. Eye contact is an important early developmental milestone for your baby and key to strengthening attachment during infancy. So carve out time for regular face-to-face interaction. This eight-week-old is in a particular sweet spot on the eye contact front, as newborns’ vision tends to take on greater clarity and focus between 6-10 weeks. Suddenly see can see dad’s face in detail and doesn’t want to miss a single second. What a sweet duo. (Note that if your baby is not making regular eye contact by 2-3 months of age, it’s worth bringing this to the attention of your pediatrician - as this may be a sign of a vision issue or other developmental concern.) This great video was shared to IG by marywrites.

Dan Wuori

1,525,307 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Open any biology textbook and you’ll learn we all start life as a single-cell embryo, genetically distinct from our parents. Human biology 101. I think Dr. Phil was trying to argue the pro-abortion position that a human child’s “personhood” somehow gets assigned after birth. But he’s wrong there, too. Any time, in human history, when we deny personhood or human rights to humans because of ANY factor—race, age, sex, religion—we open the door to history’s worst human rights abuse. The Holocaust. The Rwandan Genocide. Slavery. A human embryo is small and dependent, but so is a human newborn or toddler. Your size, development, or level of dependency doesn’t dictate your humanity or worth. We have double homicide laws that penalize violence against preborn persons if an abusive partner perpetrates it. It’s the blindness of our era that ignorantly denies life before birth and strips all rights from the preborn child. Enough. It’s unscientific and profoundly unjust. If you’re a member of the human species, you have human rights. Period. The first human right is to not be murdered.
1:32

Open any biology textbook and you’ll learn we all start life as a single-cell embryo, genetically distinct from our parents. Human biology 101. I think Dr. Phil was trying to argue the pro-abortion position that a human child’s “personhood” somehow gets assigned after birth. But he’s wrong there, too. Any time, in human history, when we deny personhood or human rights to humans because of ANY factor—race, age, sex, religion—we open the door to history’s worst human rights abuse. The Holocaust. The Rwandan Genocide. Slavery. A human embryo is small and dependent, but so is a human newborn or toddler. Your size, development, or level of dependency doesn’t dictate your humanity or worth. We have double homicide laws that penalize violence against preborn persons if an abusive partner perpetrates it. It’s the blindness of our era that ignorantly denies life before birth and strips all rights from the preborn child. Enough. It’s unscientific and profoundly unjust. If you’re a member of the human species, you have human rights. Period. The first human right is to not be murdered.

Lila Rose

19,412 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🐹 (The camera) pans over the band, pans over the fans, too, and also just flash my face for a second.. During the practice, #Jin was giving an idea of camera work for the ending part of “Awake” And on the actual concert clip, you can see the camera’s moving the exactly the way Jin envisioned. #Jin is involved in whole process and every details of his solo concert, top to bottom, beginning to the end, from the big concept to the smallest details. He is not only a fantastic performer but also a masterful concert director! He’s the master of his own craft in every possible aspects. 🔗 #RUNSEOKJIN_epTOUR_ENCORE #Jin #방탄소년단진 #진
0:42

🐹 (The camera) pans over the band, pans over the fans, too, and also just flash my face for a second.. During the practice, #Jin was giving an idea of camera work for the ending part of “Awake” And on the actual concert clip, you can see the camera’s moving the exactly the way Jin envisioned. #Jin is involved in whole process and every details of his solo concert, top to bottom, beginning to the end, from the big concept to the smallest details. He is not only a fantastic performer but also a masterful concert director! He’s the master of his own craft in every possible aspects. 🔗 #RUNSEOKJIN_epTOUR_ENCORE #Jin #방탄소년단진 #진

🍎 FOR BTS JIN (김석진번역팀)

70,512 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey Reveals Secret “Invisibility Cloak” Drone Project: “Building drones that are invisible to the human eye… it’s not just a hypothetical.” “Anduril did this in 2019, 2020.” However, the project was not continued into the final version of the “Ghost” drone. “It’s not actually that useful, it’s useful against human adversaries who do not have any other technology to aid them.” And against modern sensing devices like LiDAR and thermal cameras: “If anything the optical camouflage makes you easier to spot.” Hopefully the footage of the Ghost invisibility cloaking will be made public, it would be very cool to see.
2:27

Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey Reveals Secret “Invisibility Cloak” Drone Project: “Building drones that are invisible to the human eye… it’s not just a hypothetical.” “Anduril did this in 2019, 2020.” However, the project was not continued into the final version of the “Ghost” drone. “It’s not actually that useful, it’s useful against human adversaries who do not have any other technology to aid them.” And against modern sensing devices like LiDAR and thermal cameras: “If anything the optical camouflage makes you easier to spot.” Hopefully the footage of the Ghost invisibility cloaking will be made public, it would be very cool to see.

Anduril Appreciator

177,172 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten